When looking at the headlines over the last few days, one would think Britain is on the brink of “Civil war”.
First we had the spectacle of clashes between right-wing groups on one side, and Muslims and antifascists on the other side in Birmingham, Luton and Harrow.
Then we have John Denham, Secretary of State for communities and local government, who warned there were strong parallels between those groups, which are planning protests in Muslim neighbourhoods, and Oswald Mosley’s British Union of Fascists, who sparked fighting when they marched through Jewish areas of London’s East End in the Thirties.
Finally we hear that Police chiefs all around the country must be ready to brace themselves for a winter of race riots.
Clearly anyone supporting the British National Party feels vindicated, as this party has been saying for years, that allowing massive third world immigration against the wishes of native Britons, far from creating a vibrant multiracial society, would bring social unrest and increase the probability of a Yugoslavia-style’ civil war.
There is some truth in that, but something much more sinister is going on.
Let’s start by looking who those far-right groups are.
So far two organizations have been involved: Stop the Islamisation of Europe (SIOE) and the English Defence League (EDL).
SIOE is an alliance of people across Europe with the single aim of preventing Islam becoming the dominant religio/political force in Europe.
It originated with the joining together of Stop Islamificering Af Danmark (SIAD), a political party dedicated to stopping the Islamisation in Denmark, and a loose association of people in England, with a rallying cry of “No Sharia Here”who want to maintain English law and stop the creeping growth of sharia law in England.
It came to prominence a few years ago when it organized a demonstration in Germany attended by members of nationalist parties from all around Europe.
The EDL instead was created apparently, last spring as a reaction to some Muslims in Luton abusing British soldiers parading in Luton.
Since then they have taken part in several demonstrations, (some violent) against Muslims and the construction of mosques.
Mainstream media did their best to link the EDL to the BNP, but luckily this smear didn’t stand up to the evidence, as everyone knows the BNP doesn’t take part in demonstrations.
Nonetheless the emergence of the EDL is quite odd and many things about this organization are unclear.
Many describe it as a bunch of racist hooligans keen to use street confrontation to create trouble and challenge Islamic protesters.
Yet no one knows who the leader is, who organizes and finances them, and also why they are allowed to protest.
The Police put pressure on local authorities to stop the Red White and Blue festival and also used a drone to take images of BNP activists attending this event but, for some reason, didn’t use the same tactic against the EDL.
It’s true that protesting is a fundamental human right, but, if this action is the prelude to disorder then Police have the right to stop those events from taking place.
This is why the BNP refuse to take part in any demonstration, because we are well aware that our enemies will do their best to stir up trouble and destroy our credibility as a mainstream political party by giving the media more excuse to attack us.
However the EDL is allowed to take part in an event that could easily develop into violent clashes and increase racial tension but apparently the EDL are not bothered by the bad coverage they receive.
Another oddity is that, according to some articles, several Police forces are working together to investigate the EDL.
Now if it’s true that many EDL members are former hooligans, the claim that it’s difficult to work out who they are is a big lie.
All the football teams are heavily infiltrated and monitored in order to find out and ban violent football’ supporters this strategy has been very successful in containing hooliganism. So if EDL members are former hooligans they must surely be known to the Police. Also, is it a coincidence that at about the same time this movement started to get active, mainstream media began to raise the fear level of imminent race riots gripping the UK.
All the above may indicate that this EDL is a MI5/Special Branch operation, aiming to create instability so that government will have the perfect excuse to introduce emergency measures. Many may see this as another conspiracy theory but given this government’ penchant for spin and breach of our Civil Rights, this possibility should not be ruled out.
Labour ministers know that not only will they lose the next General Election but they may also be out of power for a very long time, if not forever. So emergency measures adopted a few weeks before the GE is called aiming to deal with Civil unrest may suit Labour very well.
If anyone is still sceptical about this, we suggest a look at the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, this allows ministers to order any sort of action by police, military or civil service. It gives them the power to order confiscation and destruction of private property without compensation; power to evacuate areas, impose no-go zones; and to ban peaceful protest. Moreover, ministers will have the power to suspend all primary legislation and to create criminal offences for failure to comply with the powers.
The draconian powers available under the proposed Act will mean that Government ministers can effectively crack down on any kind of civil disobedience they consider to be disruptive, they will effectively be able to seal off cities, impose travel bans, censor news media, and have all telecommunications cut off.
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS













My thoughts exactly (although in my mind it had a lot more cursing in it)… this is definitely a set-up.
They're so close to destroying our Nation and would've if the Europe that was allowed to vote voted Yah instead of Nay. Now they see their own future failure at the GE I never doubted that they would use trickery to cling on, just long enough to sign over all our Powers to Brussels.
The end may be sooner than we think. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst.
This doesn't surprise me at all. At first I thought it was about time someone had the balls to stand up against the invader extremists but it is important to always question the motives. This article points out well the fact that there appears to be no cohesive force behind this group, something you'd think MI5 would be able to find out in a jiffy considering all the ID shots from the media….
2
Then on to London where an EDL anti-Islamic extremism rally was to have taken place in Trafalgar Square. The GLA had moved the pro-Palestinian Muslim rally to Marble Arch to keep them apart, but any stray EDL protesters found themselves outnumbered by more seething adherents of the Religion Of Peace. The police were seriously undermanned for both protests so it's lucky that no major trouble flared up.
I have no time for the EDL but it's clear who the truly dangerous people are. Who would you say were the biggest threats to the peace.. a possibly MI5-run gang of brainless football hooligans or a large state-endorsed hornets' nest of cultural supremacists (and dangerous Red subversives) waiting their turn to climb the ladder of power and influence? Remember that the Lefty bloggers cheered on the Hamas brigade in their fight against violent extremist bigotry and genocide!
1
One small plus with the EDL: They help to illustrate, as clear as glass, the venomous seething hatreds of those they claim to protest.
At the Harrow mosque protest, happening just Friday last, the angry young Muslims and Communist 'anti-fascist' agitators discovered that the EDL rally would not be taking place where they were lying in wait for them after all. Their mosque was safe, but the Muslims still over-ran the police lines to try and catch up with the EDL to give them a hiding. But it seemed the EDL had melted away so their lust for kuffar blood had to go unsatiated.
My guess – for what it's worth – is the EDL is a fractured off part of UAF, and is financed in the same ways. The 'UAF' had an internal debate, and split into two parts, one opposing Muslims (grooming etc), the other thinking it doesn't matter. IMHO it's inevitable that UAF must split, because the Zionist influences that have deliberately promoted immigration, here and in the USA, must at some point notice that Muslim ideology is opposed to them. Who knows what will happen – as there is developing Zionists and whites and Muslims in what is a three way battle, and where there could be alliances. So watch for more groups, all of course secretly funded and liable to infiltrate each other. Sigh – this is what happens with censorship.
I have suspected the origins of the EDL since their suprise appearance. It is clear that this corrupt government will stop at nothing to ensure the 'old boys' network can keep their fingers in the till. After all Mr Phillips pathetic attempts to deprive us of the only party dedicated to the preservation of the British nation are well documented, this would be the next step if we in the BNP got to popular with the voters and looked like kicking out the drunken old LIlabcon sods in Troughminster.
I am the same as most people blogging here,I too thought that the EDL were spot on and that some one had the cajones to take on the religion of peace,it all sounds so easy,too good to be true.As the saying goes,anything too good to be true probably is. Andy Pandy behind it??
The EDL are now saying that muslims can join.That seems to defeat their objectives.
I have a feeling, just speculation mind, that that the EDL exists to re-enforce the lie that Islam really is moderate, and that the Muslim trouble causers are really just "extremists". If this were true, we might predict that the EDL would accept "moderate" Muslims at some point to help British people fight those "nasty" pretend Mulsims, you know, the ones who are "misunderstanders" of the "true, peaceful" Islam.
If that happens then all this is a ploy to put the Brits back to sleep about Islam. You know what I mean, "They are only an extremist minority, but the real, true, majority, peace-loving Muslims are helping us squelch them, see? So go back to sleep sheeple and vote LibLabCon."
I can see your point, but please read 'The Islamist' by Ed Husain…His own true story of when he "joined radical Islam in Britain, what he saw, and why he left'.
I Agree, the purpose of EDL is to cause civil unrest which in turn will mean more state powers.
I'm sure many members lower down feel patriotic about their country, it's human nature but you are being worked lads, you are being led.
If you really want to help your country, get off the streets, don't give the Govt the excuse it needs for more police state powers.
Tell the establishment you're not going to walk into their trap, Stick two fingers up to the Lib Lab Con Establishment and put your cross in the BNP Box then go down the pub and celebrate with a Pint for having outsmarted the treasonous Marxist Scumbags.
http://www.tinyurl.com/culturalmarxism
EDL are a strange bunch whos leadership have now found an independent MP to ask questions in the house and for some reason they have stopped promoting the English democrats who a few of the admin of EDL favour or tthe UKip contingency whithin their ranks constantly bleet on about. However the proposed demo in Stoke is with the full knowledge that the area has a strong BNP representation elected on the local council .The EDL usually demonstrate places with higher islamic profiles and the so called EDL road toure now seems to be picking easy targets compared to calls from within by members to visit Bradford,Birmingham and Leicester or Cardiff they seem happy to cause problems in stoke for BNP candidates to feel the fallout with what they say is full police cooperation and the promise of being able to march as an alternative to usual static demos
Presumably EDL or any other group wanting to protest must first ask permission through the local police. It is therefore (presumably), rather simple for the police to identify the people who made the application as that person must state who they are (presumably). I cannot imagine the police would grant an application to a bloke in a balaclava who did not give his name. As for the EDL's sudden rise I also agree. 15 bus loads of people didn't just suddenly appear without prior notice or any public awareness of them. Secondly, who hired the buses and who paid. Thirdly, I notice these lot (and UAF for that matter), have perfect printed banners whereas ISLAMISTS tend to be srawled by hand. (Just an observation), but it does pose questions for THEM (LibLabCon), to answer.
I've been saying that for quite a while now.
Protesting outside Parliament was banned by New Labour yet the EDL and assorted UAF/TRAITORS were allowed to do just that.
They were also herded closer together by police tactics, and were lucky that violence did not kick off bigstyle.
It's what they want. deny democracy by causing Civil Unrest, bringing in Emergency powers and postponing the date of the Election until further notice.
The Unions are in this in a big way.
the 'UNITE' in 'UNITE' against fascism is UNITE the UNION.
Many prominent Union Leaders are married to New Labour Ministers.
Harriet Harman and Jack Dromy of UNITE the Union.
Third partys acting on behalf the Government to deny OUR DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS such as UAF, EHCR, OPERATION BLACK VOTE (illegal under EHRC rules?)etc.
I do not agree with the accusation that the EDL are funded/directed/supported by Mi5/6 or any police special branch.
The EDL i feel is what you see on the TV, A group of people who live around council estates who see that others with more rights than they can ever dream of, It may be a perceived thought the EDL hold yet one can understand there current position, W e have seen uncontrolled immigration into the UK for the last 20 years, hence why we have so many child abuse case and child murders.
To indicate the EDL or groups of that nature are funded by government or any security service is simply a distraction and i feel this distraction quite targeted at the EDL, One must now ask if the author has his or her own agenda ,as such