A favourite method used by government to enrich an “awfully white” area, is to swamp it with asylum seekers!!
No worries that all of them are bogus, and thus we are under no obligation to allow them on our soil, because they crossed dozens of borders before arriving in the UK.
We all know, that the only reason they are welcomed here by the ‘Musical Chair Party’ is to change the fabric of our society and force communities to become multiracial, and by definition to ethnically cleanse the indigenous from the face of our country.
The latest target for this plan is Bristol.
Bristol City Council will vote in March on whether it should become the UK’s second ‘City of Sanctuary’.
If the vote is successful, Bristol will become a city that will officially welcome refugees and asylum seekers, and will attempt to make them an integral part of our community.
To nationalists, ‘City of Sanctuary” sounds like a Government scheme to sting the taxpayer and increase the numbers of asylum seekers.
But Forward Maisokwadzo, development worker at “City of Sanctuary” Bristol, argues that this is not the case.
He said: “City of Sanctuary’ would not, in any way, be campaigning for people to come to Bristol.
“We are specifically looking at people in Bristol already to see how we can live together in harmony and peace, although part of that work is extending the welcome to newcomers as well.“
On a national level, ‘City of Sanctuary’ is a registered charity funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust. It receives no money from the Government.
To earn ‘City of Sanctuary’ status, Bristol must prove to the national group that as many people in the city as possible are aware of the issues and support the principle.
They must have the support of at least 100 organisations and 200 individuals. Currently the group has 60 organisations on board including Amnesty International, Bristol group, Refugee Action and Faithnet Southwest.
It also requires the support and involvement of local refugee communities, and more important still, the city council.
The council cannot just give its blessing but must also provide a specific commitment and co-operation with the ‘City of Sanctuary’ group.
Councillor Gary Hopkins (Lib Dem, Knowle), said this did not mean the council would be supporting the scheme financially.
He said: “We have got our statutory responsibilities (to people seeking asylum). We have to provide healthcare and education. ‘City of Sanctuary’ is funded by the voluntary sector. There are no new resources from the council.
“The biggest problem is people like the BNP and other extremist groups who exploit the situation by saying things such as: ‘They are getting our council houses’. They are not. People seeking asylum do not get offered council property.”
There are currently 265 asylum seekers in Bristol and South Gloucestershire.
It is not known how many refugees there are in the area.
The Rt Rev Mike Hill, Bishop of Bristol, said he was fully supportive of the initiative that would make a difference to the lives of asylum seekers.
He said: “Deep within the Judaeo-Christian tradition is the impulse to welcome and involve ‘outsiders’ and those who are persecuted fully in the life of the community.”
The council was due to discuss the report this week but this has now been delayed until March.
Mr Maisokwadzo said: “Let’s look at ‘City of Sanctuary’ with a human heart. We are talking about people here.
It’s for the good of the community, irrespective (despite) whether you are a refugee or a Bristolian.”
John Goulandris, Conservative councillor for Stoke Bishop, said: “There is a serious risk that, if Bristol were to become a ‘City of Sanctuary’, it would undoubtedly create unrealistic expectations and damage community cohesion.
“While Bristolians are generous-spirited and welcoming, to make Bristol a ‘City of Sanctuary’ might send the (wrong) signal that we were pro-actively seeking to increase our population and that we do not have issues regarding scarcity of affordable housing, congestion, lack of primary school places and pressure on social services.”
Of course no one asked the Bristol voters if they agree with this plan, they prefer to impose their decision on the local population and then claim that anyone who is against it is a racist.
Bristol already has a problem with Somalian refugees, and if nothing is done to stop this plan then in a few years time it will look like Hackney, Newham, Wembley and many other once “terribly white” cities in the UK, where you can walk for miles without spotting a white face.
The good news about this, is that more people will wake up to the threat, and we stand a good chance to get one or more BNP councillors elected soon.
This is what happened in Barking & Dagenham a few years ago, when the ‘African for Essex’ plan helped us get 12 councillors in 2006, and it’s helping us now to gain control of the council on 6th of May.
And I didn’t make this up.
GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS
Looks like a good place to blitz with our information.
The BNP must ask the people of Bristol in the May Elections. They must stand as many candidates as they can!
Blimey, it's like the Bastards that Be want to replace us all.
Another reason to vote BNP whenever we get the chance.
Are there council elections in Bristol this May?