The Labour Party are experts at whipping up hatred and division. Ex Labour Member of Parliament P Woolas, and foreign born MP M Hodge were both caught out red handed inciting hatred. Hodge on the documentary ‘battle of Barking’. The shadowy organisations Searchlight and United Against Freedom (both Labour front groups) are now tasked by Labour with the mission of going into foreign born communities and whipping up racial and religious hatred against the indigenous people. Nick Lowles, who hides behind a false name is a foreign Muslim extremist from Mauritius who works closely with Jerry Gable another foreigner and convicted burglar. Bot are on the Labour payroll. Whipping up hatred and inciting violence are all part and parcel of their scheme. Weymman Bennett another foreigner incidentally and Chairman of the UAF along with other members was recently arrested for criminal conspiracy, racism, and incitement after their counter demonstrations against peaceful EDL meetings. Part of the incitement stems from encouraging young students to get drunk and cause trouble at meetings. Do their parents know what goes on within the UAF?
The Labour Party are using these two front groups to single out and whip up hatred in the Muslim community which could clearly result in terrorist incidents and the loss of lives in this country. The level of racist and anti-semitic attacks in this country has never been so high with whites and Jews targeted by foreign born terrorists and criminals belonging to these organisations. Recently leaders of the EDL and members of their families have been told by the police that their lives are at risk from Muslim extremists whipped up by the hatred fomented by the Labour Party, Searchlight and the UAF. David Cameron yesterday, in seeking to appease the British born population gave a speech using sympathetic words and promises to appease the population against these extremists in our midst. Cameron if he means what he says should first seek to ban Searchlight and the UAF who are working against peace and harmony in this country. Cameron and the Conservatives could have blood on their hands if they do nothing. Cameron further stated he will cut funding to extremist organisations, but under Labour these extremists groups have become direct conduits for Labour funding, rabble rousing, and its insidious anti British, pro foreign, and communist agenda. Extremists groups Searchlight and the UAF alongside other Islamic groups they work with have received millions of pounds of taxpayers money and have a direct influence on the Labour party and its policies. Those Labour MPs who face these fanatical extremists down in their own party and in their own constituencies, including Jack straw and Steven Timms, face death threats and violent attack. People who have followed closely over the years the politics of this country I am sure know we are living in interesting and dangerous times. It is clear Pandora’s box is well and truly open and anything could happen next.
Should Searchlight and the UAF be banned? Have your say.
Should Searchlight and the UAF be banned?
Of course but I won't hold my breath waiting for it to happen.
As with all politicians, it is not what they say but what they actually do, that reveals their true intentions.
Cameron is a key signatory of UAF amongst other MP's, if he abolished these extreme outfits this would be like admitting he was an extremist himself?
I have a letter from an MP who is a very close friend of David Cameron . I asked the MP to explain why the Conservative leader supports UAF and obligingly the MP replied with the signed letter .
To summarise the explanation it is because Cameron thinks the BNP are such a threat that it justifies supporting a trotskyist pro-Islamic anti Jewish anti British anti Christian bunch of violent rabble in order to help them fight the BNP . Of course Cameron does not condone the violence that the UAF are notorious for !
Cameron wont ban either of these organisations because their sole purpose is to disrupt the BNP and interfere with elections
If the Police did their job properly there would be no need for a ban, as they would all be in Prison.
In the interest of freedom of speech and democracy governmental banning is NOT an option. However, the use of predominantly indigenous tax payers money to fund such groups is repugnant and should NEVER have taken place. This was a deliberate act by the parliamentary parties to interfere with the political process and maintain their totalitarian strangle hold on debate.
They can't ban them until they find out how deep their operatives are since they lost contact with them.
They are not political parties so should be arrested and jailed if found to interfere in any way with the election process either through propaganda,intimidation or via aiding in vote rigging.
Also they should recieve no funding or support directly or indirectly from other registered political parties or the taxpayer.Any registered member or political party as a whole caught doing so should be banned or struck off.
They are really after the BNP, best way to really annoy them is not play into their hands, I recall once and ex SAS guy taken to court for beating up 6 Coppers, he turned up wearing a pink tutu, now I'm not suggesting…….
In reality the state doesn't need violent groups like United and Fascist. It has such a strangle hold on election offices and polling stations it can swing election results whatever way it can.
There is always a problem with banning groups such as these. To start with, they will simply carry on under different names and cosmetic changes to their organisations. Also, who decides who is extremist? The BNP is always referred to, in the media and by politicians as extreme or far right, the inference being that the party is extremist. If the UAF or Searchlight are banned, then attention will turn to the BNP or the EDL.
The politicians would love nothing more than banning any and all organisations that they view as a threat to their establishment and priviliges, thus ensuring that the four or five year elective dictatorship system that poses as a democracy will last forever.
Grumpygit, I doubt if this is true. There are quite a few acts which are illegal – incitements, threats, menaces, conspiracies and so on – which, if proven, could result in jail sentences. The reason there have been few jail sentences is of course because these bizarre alien fanatics – Lowles, Gable, 'Bennett' and so on – are tacitly tolerated, in the way heroin dealers and child molesters and ritual slaughterers are tacitly tolerated. The charges don't have to be of 'extremism', but the arguably simpler matter of deciding on threats, intimidation, vote rigging and the rest.
I agree with the comments on here, just add though I think David Cameron now sees the situation as it is by is statement recently that muliticulture is nt working so then a petition was posted on the internet for popel to say that it is. The truth being it is not. Remember he can not act alone and there is Muslims now in Parliament and he has the LIb dems that are indeed another head in the stand Islamic pacifiers. ALL THE ONLY WAY WE WILL GET HELP IS WITH IT EITHER BEING TOTAL CONS OR THE BNP TO GET IN NEXT TIME. Only problem is with all these different parties to vote for it ends up being a coalition which then is going to be like this is now. God forbid it being a LAB-LIB next time we are done for. ;-(