There must be something wrong with Trevor Phillips, the Guyana-born chief of the EHRC.

First he started legal action against the British National Party because our constitution didn’t allow non-whites to become members and forced us to change this.

Never mind that there is a principle called freedom of association, a basic human right that give individuals free choice to whom they choose to associate with, but we all know this was just an excuse for the establishment to destroy us (and by the way, how many blacks and Asians would join anyway?).

However even this was not enough, and now Herr Phillips is threatening to jail BNP Chairman Nick Griffin for contempt of court because some parts of our political programme may indirectly discriminate against minorities.

But just like a drug addict needing stronger stuff to stay high, Phillips needs to find new targets to satisfy his thirst for power.

Apparently the EHRC said it was considering whether to take the Treasury to court.

The quango said it feared Chancellor George Osborne had not investigated the impact of his Budget on vulnerable groups – such as women, the elderly, the disabled and ethnic minorities – as legally required.

The Treasury is also facing legal action from women’s rights group the Fawcett Society, which says ministers took no account of the Budget’s effect on women.

It comes a day after the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a highly respected think-tank, said Mr Osborne’s financial changes were ‘clearly regressive’, hitting the poor and families with children hardest.

This contradicts official claims from the Chancellor and his Lib Dem allies that the budget was ‘fair’ and ‘progressive’.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, facing increasing clamour from his Lib Dem backbenchers, was forced to defend the Budget.

‘This IFS analysis is by definition partial,’ he said. ‘It does not include the things we want to do to get people off benefits and into work.’

Mr Clegg, whose personal and party poll ratings have fallen through the floor in recent weeks, said the Government’s plans also included a pupil premium to improve education opportunities for poorer children and further changes to the tax system.

But Mike Hancock, Lib Dem MP for Portsmouth South, said: ‘We didn’t sign up for a Coalition that was going to hurt the poorest people in society, and I certainly didn’t get elected to do that ever.’

He said that unless Mr Clegg came up with a good answer to the IFS report, there would be a ‘very sticky’ upcoming Lib Dem party conference and serious thinking by members generally’.

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission said one option being considered was applying for a judicial review into the Budget, while another was sending in a hit squad to work with Treasury civil servants on equality issues.

Neil Kinghan, the quango’s chief executive, said equalities legislation was ‘not designed to prevent reductions in public expenditure’, adding: ‘Its role, and the commission’s role, is to ensure fairness is at the heart of decisions.’

He said the commission had asked the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, for assurances, but had received no response.

Asked on the BBC’s Today show if an equality impact assessment had been carried out, Treasury minister Mark Hoban declined to comment.

Labour leadership contender David Miliband said: ‘This report reveals George Osborne’s Budget was soft on the banks, hard on the poor.’

Shadow Chancellor Alistair Darling said: ‘Nick Clegg is talking nonsense. He might think he can take his party for fools, but the British public can see all too clearly that there’s nothing fair about this Coalition.’

Now there is a lot to be said against the budget even if some bits, like the reform of the benefit system, should be supported because there are too many scroungers living on benefits rather than looking for a job, but this is not the point.

Whatever you think of this coalition the fact is that an unelected and unaccountable quango shouldn’t be allowed to interfere in government policies and tell elected politicians what he/she should or shouldn’t do.

And by the way since when did Trevor Phillips become concerned about the plight of the poor?

The only thing he cares about is turning Britain in a third world hell-hole and use (or better abuse) his power to harass and prosecute any organization which dares stand up for the interests of indigenous Britons.

Maybe George Osborne should follow the suggestion made by Spiked, an online magazine run by far-left Jewish.

In spite of their hatred for the BNP they were outspoken in condemning the legal action taken against us by the EHRC as they saw not only an unacceptable violation of a basic human right but the introduction of fascism by the back door.

“They first come to the ‘racists’” was the warning that politicians in Westminster decided to ignore and now Mr Phillips is coming to them.

What goes around comes around.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Readers will I am sure remember that a ‘lady’ called Sarah Brooks wrote a letter printed in the Barking & Dagenham Post (BD Post) attacking me.

It concerned the axing of ‘Building Schools for the Future’ and the fact I said that the cancellation of this programme would make it harder for Labour councillors to swamp the borough with immigrants.

Below is a link to a this story:

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2010/08/05/letter-attacking-me-in-barking-dagenham-post/

As I expected the BD Post did not publish my letter in response, but instead printed a letter by Terry Justice, a former Tory councillor.

“I join your correspondent, Sarah Brooks, (post bag, August 4), in expressing disappointment that money is not available to refurbish our schools.

No! the promise was made by an irresponsible government in its death throes and for the worst of reasons – electioneering. I would prefer that we spent what money we have on quality teachers. Building do not create knowledge, dedicated people with the ability to communicate do”.
TERRY JUSTICE

To be fair, Mr Justice echoed many of the points I had already made, one being that the quality of education will not improve by throwing more money at it. But he has deliberately ignored the fact that those funds are, in the main needed to add new classrooms in order to accommodate the increased number of children resulting from the huge number of immigrant families dumped on B & D by the council.

This omission should not surprise anyone, because while Labour were busy swamping the borough with third world immigrants, the Conservative party never uttered one word in protest, and they never objected to any of it, probably because they didn’t want to be accused of being nasty and racist.

The Labour party contradicted itself when it admitted in the council-run freesheet that this money was needed because in the coming years demand for school places would increase.

We all know the reason for this increase, they admitted as much, that in the last seven years the birthrate increased by 50% and it was not because long term residents suddenly wanted bigger families.

Readers should also read the letter written by Labour councillor Rocky Gill in reply to Terry Justice

“I read former Tory councillor Terry Justice’s letter (post bag August 11) with interest. He states that Labour’s commitment to invest £270m in borough schools was “a meaningless election stunt”, made for “the worst of reasons”. Terry’s memory must be failing. Labour’s pledge on BSF funding was done long before any recent election. And for the life of me I cannot remember Mr Justice stating at any point that he or his party opposed this vital investment in schools.

What a pity then that Mr Justice prefers sounding off from the sidelines and rewriting history in the process.”
ROCKY GILL

So Cllr Gill admits that the increase in demand for school places is putting pressure on those schools, and we all know it was Labour that created the problem in the first place.

But what is so laughably funny is that Labour expect other parties to support them in order to save BSF funding, even though they have no opposition in the town hall and so they can do whatever they want.

I don’t know what is going to happen, but am glad that my article started the debate on an important topic because it means that I am doing something right.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The British National Party is setting the agenda of the main political parties.

Evidence of this can be found in The Observer, which printed an article on the benefits of mass immigration.

It is reported in full so that nationalists can better understand the point I am trying to make.

“The government’s proposal to cap highly skilled immigration from outside the EU is taking flak from business leaders. Employers are arguing that the limit will prevent them hiring the staff they need to deliver the growth that the government is banking on to put Britain back on an even keel. According to today’s report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development and KPMG, around one in six companies intends to recruit migrant workers in the next several months. There will be serious consequences if they cannot, especially given that almost one in 10 private sector firms is already planning to relocate jobs to India, China and eastern Europe in the next year.

In truth, the cap will restrict only the highly skilled migrants who are most obviously economically valuable. So this is hardly going to assuage public concern about high immigration.

It was public unease, expressed through opinion polls over many years, that led the Conservatives to seize on the cap as a flagship policy for the general election. Labour’s early record on immigration, when numbers were increasing fast, meant the party would get no credit later for putting in place one of the most robust and effective immigration systems in the world, with the points-based system as its centrepiece. The cap was much simpler, a seemingly “tough” policy with real voter appeal. But it has left the new government in a very difficult position: it can please immigration sceptics or economic liberals, but not both. At worst, it will please neither. Quite simply, the immigration cap is a bad policy.

Of course, it is legitimate for the government to take a view on the level of immigration that the UK can manage. People will disagree on whether the objective of “net immigration in the tens, rather than hundreds of thousands” is the right one, but it seems reasonable enough, in principle, for the government to have such an objective. After all, immigration has been very high in the last decade, although it is now falling.

The decrease is probably largely a result of the economic downturn, as well as tighter rules in recent years. Lower net immigration helps to take some of the heat out of a public and political debate that has become polarised and sometimes vicious, stigmatising immigrants and giving succour to the far right.

There are plenty of myths, but little hard evidence that recent immigration has caused significant problems to the UK as a whole. On the contrary, the evidence suggests that immigration has, on balance, brought significant economic and social benefits.

However, where immigration has had negative local impacts, for example by increasing pressure on public services, the consequences have too often been felt by the poorer and more deprived communities. But the government is at risk of confusing symptoms with causes. Reducing immigration will not provide people with secure and well-paid jobs or with affordable housing.

We need to see migration as part of a wider picture of economic change. In an era of globalisation, migration has been an important part of the UK’s economic model. Britain has been happy to see its best companies sold to foreign owners; it can hardly complain when the new proprietors want to bring in some of their own staff.

For many organisations, having international staff is a benefit rather than a reflection of skills shortages. The multinational company bringing a senior executive from its New York office to its HQ in London, the ballet company hiring the newest talent from Cuba, or the academic department recruiting great minds reflect the fact that in many fields the UK has become a global centre of excellence.

We should not forget the contribution that waves of immigrants have made. The commitment of the Ugandan Asians is still apparent across Britain. The US has consistently shown what smart and humane immigration policies can offer in return, economically and socially.”

So far there is nothing new, The Observer is using the same used and abused arguments to convince native Britons that being dispossessed of their land is good for them.

However the real surprise can be found in the second part of the comment.

“In their search for foreign staff, employers may be responding to a skills shortages that reflects underinvestment in education and training. In today’s study, 42% of the employers believe literacy skills of British graduates have fallen in the past five years against only 6% who believe they have gone up. We should be worried if UK employers are having to look overseas to find the skilled staff they need.

The UK is consistently failing to train enough engineers and scientists, for example. In other areas, recruitment difficulties seem more likely to reflect low wages and poor terms and conditions than skills shortages. The fact that there is a shortage of senior care workers tells us more about how we undervalue those essential staff than about the ability of British people to do these jobs.

The challenge for government is not to come up with ever more inventive ways of stopping skilled foreign workers coming to the UK, but to address the underlying reasons that mean we need them. Of course, in such fiscally straitened times, this may be easier said than done if the answers are higher wages in the public sector and more investment in education.

The suspicion that some employers are resorting to recruiting immigrant labour to avoid the costs of training British staff, or actively using migrant labour as a way to keep wages down, should be focusing the government’s attention on employment regulation and employers’ obligations to their staff and the wider community. Public concern about immigration would be better addressed by rigorous enforcement of minimum-wage legislation than by caps or limits on skilled migration. Where employers are failing to provide apprenticeships or training for staff, the government needs to encourage them to take responsibility for the training their future workforce. Restricting their access to foreign staff might induce them to do this, but it seems a curiously roundabout way of tackling the problem.

With the introduction of the cap the government is showing an uncharacteristic enthusiasm for intervening in the workings of the free market and is picking a fight with business in the process. The outcome would be better if some of that enthusiasm were directed at the root causes of economic insecurity. And if that requires picking a different fight with business, at least the immigration cap has provided the government with some practice.”

So even the anti-British, anti-whites marxists writing for a far-left paper like The Observer admit that government should address the shortage of qualified people by training native Britons instead of allowing more immigrants.

Of course they are very careful to avoid of being seen as racist (perish the thought) but if you read between the lines they clearly echo the point we have been making for years, namely that companies prefer to hire cheaper and qualified immigrants rather than training native Britons and that the education system is failing to produce qualified people.

Unsurprisingly they are still campaigning for more immigration, but even for The Observer it is becoming more difficult to dismiss as racist our policies.

This is a great achievement for nationalists, who would have believed only a few months ago that such a rag could urge government to put more emphasis on training native workforce?

Further evidence, if needed, that the BNP has never been so powerful even though we have no MPs.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

To understand some of the damage caused by our membership of the EU, one only need look at the flood of regulations coming straight from Brussels which affect every aspect of our lives.

It’s not a ‘Jack and Jill’ book we are talking about, it is tens of thousands of pages of rules that require a huge amount of time and a great deal of patience to understand.

These EU rules and demands have played a large part in the destruction of the British economy, especially in the manufacturing sector and nationalists who run a business will know exactly what I’m talking about.

You will not therefore be surprised to hear that new Brussels red tape for this year will cost Britain nearly £10billion.

The shocking cost is just for regulations enforced in this financial year, so are on top of the existing EU burden.

Tory MP Philip Davies, said: “It’s absolutely astonishing and just goes to show how uncompetitive the EU is making British business.

“The vast majority of businesses don’t have any dealings with the EU. It’s particularly galling that they have to bear the costs of the regulations. When people realise how much the EU costs they will come to the conclusion that we would be better off out.”

Before the election, Labour estimated British and EU regulations in force from April would cost businesses, the public sector, voluntary groups and individuals between £27.8billion and £30.3billion a year.

Thirty-one per cent, between £8.6billion and £9.4billion, is down to EU laws, according to Business Minister Mark Prisk.

Dr Lee Rotherham, of the campaign group the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: “The cost of the red tape now exceeds the value of the business it is intended to regulate. It’s sheer madness, and not why we joined in the first place.”

Maybe Mr Davies should direct his concern to David Cameron, the man who first promised and then denied a referendum on the EU treaty.

Indeed he and the Lb-Con coalition, far from taking away power from Brussels, want the integration process to go further.

If Philips Davies is really determined to stop this madness he should jump ship and join the British National Party, the only political party who want to withdraw the UK from the EU.

Any chance it will happen?

Don’t hold your breath.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Although government vehemently denies it, we all know that tens of billions of Pounds are wasted every year on immigrants and asylum seekers.

The British National Party has been accused of inciting racial hatred whenever we try to expose the true cost of immigration, but hiding the truth is becoming more difficult for them.

They may like to explain why the £115,000 a week spent on translators helping immigrants claim benefits in Britain. is facing intense scrutiny.

The Government wants to cut the cost of interpreters which last year soared to more than £6 million, a 50 per cent rise.

In the last six years 169,000 immigrants claimed unemployment benefit within six months of getting a National Insurance number.

The benefits alone cost taxpayers £1.4million a week but added to that is the translation bill. Most of it came from providing face-to-face and telephone translation services for people whose grasp of English was not good enough to understand the benefits system.

Employment Minister Chris Grayling said: “It’s been quite clear to us that costs ran out of control under the last Government. We aim to bring the costs down as far as we possibly can. We’ve been very clear that people coming to live and work in the UK need to be able to speak English.”

In 2004, Labour Employment ­Minister Jim Murphy pledged that costs would be curbed but the annual bill has more than doubled from the £2.63 million then.

A spokesman for the TaxPayers’ ­Alliance said: “With translation costs on the rise it’s more important than ever that the government insist newcomers learn English. Negative attitudes towards immigration are fuelled by these sorts of overheads. The cost of document translation has increasingly started to look like a very expensive exercise in politically correct PR”.

Just a question: why bring the costs down instead of stopping the money spent on interpreters altogether?

It is bad enough that people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place are getting unemployment benefit (and this is just one of many benefits) so spending money on interpreters so they can learn how to scrounge more money out of us is clearly unacceptable.

So far according to this article we pay about £80m a year for 169,000 parasites and the cost is clearly higher because it doesn’t include other benefits.

It would make people bloody angry even in good times, in these less than good times they are absolutely fuming.

On the other hand stories like this are useful in waking up people, and to convince them that the only party which will stop this madness is the British National Party.

No wonder the establishment is doing its best to bankrupt and destroy us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Barking & Dagenham council is in dire financial straits.

The 51 Labour councillors need to save £42m over the next four years, council workers are already starting to bear the brunt as salaries are now frozen, overtime payments suspended, and by the end of the year 150 of them will be thrown out of work.

But, the council still manages to find the money to spend over £3m on salaries for 31 council chiefs.

Corporate and Divisional Directors are paid in excess of £100,000 a year each, with Heads of Services slightly behind on up to £93,000 annually.

Acting chief executive, David Woods takes home £145,000 a year excluding expenses.

Corporate Directors like Darren Henaghan (Customer Services) and Helen Jenner (Children Services) are the next highest paid, earning up to £132,000 annually.

Divisional Directors such as Nina Clark (Legal & Democratic Services) and Chris Pelham (Safeguarding & Rights) are paid a salary of £110,000 – £116,000.

In total up to £3,245,000 is spent on the wages of 31 people each year.

Before he left the council former boss Bob Whiteman took home a £189,000 pay packet.

To be fair, compared to other councils in London, the amount of money spent on B&D high level civil servants is not outrageous .
Newham borough council chief Joe Duckworth earned £241,000 last year, and Tower Hamlets a few weeks ago attracted a lot of criticism when it emerged that its top earning officials took home £18m between them last year.

So when a council needs to make big savings, targeting the salary of the highest paid civil servants should be the priority and that is why the British National Party wanted to peg civil servant’ salaries to £60,000.

Had this measure been implemented the council would have saved £1,385,000, enough to save maybe 40 council jobs.

Unfortunately voters believed the lies spread by antifascist groups that if the BNP gained control of the council many would have lost their jobs.

The truth is that not only they are going to lose their jobs anyway but the scale of those losses will be bigger as Labour will never tackle wasteful expenditure.

How much money is wasted on politically correct projects?

One of these is the Race Equality Project, manufactured to ‘fight discrimination and promote community cohesion’.

I can reveal that Barking & Dagenham for the year 2010/2011 will give £62,600 to an organization called Harmony House.

Interesting to note that the year before it only received £31,300.

It appears to me, now that the BNP has been swept out of the council, Labour feels it is entitled to increase funding to HH by 100%, since with no opposition they need not explain to anyone why they have done it.

Sooner or later there will be cuts in essential services and voters will find out that under Labour things can only get worse not better, and when push comes to shove they will realise they have been conned, they will see what they have voted for, and put the BNP where it truly belongs…. In control of B&D!!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

If we stopped wasting money on immigrants and asylum seekers, we could help reduce the £160bn deficit, lessening the cuts to essential services or increasing taxes.

This simple fact is that bungling border officials are preparing to write off almost £70million in bad debts, overpayments and compensation to asylum seekers.

A shocking catalogue of costly mistakes at the Home Office’s UK Border Agency meant £26million had to be written off in the last financial year.

The agency paid out £13million of benefits in error to would-be refugees since April 2008.

Astonishingly, a further £41million has had to be set aside in special accounts to cover more bungles, including bad debts, overpayments and compensation claims, this year.

The agency’s accounts reveal £12million was overpaid last year to just six hostel ­owners for providing asylum seekers’ accommodation.

Embarrassingly for the agency’s Home Office bosses, £4.3million ended up incorrectly in the pockets of the agency’s own staff.

Failure to update salary changes and annual leave entitlements on payroll systems meant the agency overpaid more than 2,500 employees by an average of about £1,700 each.

Meanwhile three ­refugees who were unlawfully detained while border officials investigated their claims ended up being paid more than £330,000 each last year in compensation.

And settlements worth £2.1million were reached with 40 under-18s who were wrongly detained as adults – an average of £52,000 each.

Yet in spite of the mistakes, 29 senior officials were paid £295,000 in bonuses in 2009. Bernard Jenkin, chairman of the Commons Public Administration Committee said: “The public administration of the civil service has become increasingly dysfunctional.

“The whole basis of civil administration in the UK has to be a huge agenda for the new government.”

The losses are detailed in the Border Agency’s annual report, published last week. Most embarrassing of the errors is the £13.1million in benefits overpaid to asylum seekers in the past two years.

Officials found that payments still being made to claimants when support should have ended totalled £9.6million during 2008/09 and £3.5million during 2009/10.

About £1.9million went to asylum seekers whose applications had already failed.

Agency chief executive Lin Homer said: “Overpayments should not be happening and we are committed to seeing them dramatically reduced. It is crucial that taxpayers’ money is spent wisely.”

Once again we can see how taxpayers money is wasted on people who should not be in this country in the first place, let alone those coming here with the sole intention of getting rich and fat at our expense.

It is also important that we point the finger at the multitude of businesspeople who profit from this asylum racket, like the aforementioned hotel owners who gain handsomely by renting accommodation to refugees. (Landlord Tenants Act 2004)

Small wonder Britain is bankrupt.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

If we stopped giving benefits to immigrants and asylum seekers now we could save a massive amount of money, lessening the effects of cuts and tax hikes.

If anyone still has doubts they should look at the latest revelation that taxpayers are forking out more than £1,000 a week in housing benefit to nearly 100 families for a total cost of £100,000.

The Daily Star has obtained figures exposing the fortune squandered by Labour keeping spongers in luxury homes.

David Cameron has vowed to overhaul Britain’s broken welfare system and root out abuse.

We told you how jobless dad-of-seven Abdi Nur is living it up on benefits in a £2million mansion in Kensington, London. It was thought his case was a one-off. But we can now reveal that more than 90 families enjoy the same perk.

They are being housed in super-sized properties in upmarket addresses because they have so many children.

And they are all pocketing £1,000 per week or more (each) in housing benefit just for their rent, totalling nearly £5million a year.

The full bill, when other benefits such as jobseekers’ allowance and council tax relief are taken into account, will be massive. Iain Duncan Smith’s Department For Work And Pensions is scrapping Labour’s rules, which set maximum housing benefit at £1,600 a week.

But his new cap of £400 per week for the biggest families will not kick in until next April.

Matthew Sinclair, Research Director at the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “Taxpayers were outraged to hear that they were having to support a family on benefits to live in a house few of them could possibly afford.

“They will be shocked to hear so many others are enjoying the same extravagant treatment. This shows how vital it is to quickly reform housing benefit to stop this kind of abuse.”

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: “We have announced urgent reforms to the housing benefit system to end the absurd situation of people on benefits living in homes that most working families couldn’t afford.

“We will bring in legislation this autumn to make the changes and the reforms will come into force early next year.”

Mr Duncan Smith will today set out his plans to end the madness of families being better off on benefits than earning a living.

Even though the Daily Star failed to mention it (it would breach the NUJ guidelines), it’s clear that all those families are immigrants and asylum seekers, as very few British families have more than three children.

And by the way how many native Britons are left in central London?

Now we have said it before, those families shouldn’t be in Britain in the first place, let alone get rich and fat at taxpayers expense.

Those scroungers shouldn’t get a penny, and if they suffer hardship it’s not our problem because our priority is to help native Britons those who have worked and paid taxes all their lives, and offer opportunities to the children of the white-working class who have been left so far behind.

Before anyone accuses me of being ‘racist’ I would like to remember that the first Asians and blacks who arrived in the UK came here to work and not to be pampered and spoiled at our expense, and we all know that the so called refugees are opportunists who travelled through several safe countries with the intention of claiming asylum here so they can get benefits and council homes.

You will be interested to know I am sure that two politicians that are strongly opposed to a cap in housing benefits are Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson.

Mr Livingstone is worried that such a cap would be a threat to the diversity that makes London ‘great’.

Apart from the fact that many native Londoners never wanted their city to be diverse (otherwise they wouldn’t have moved out to Essex and Surrey) what does this cap on housing benefit have to do with diversity?

There is no justification for government to pay huge rents for the poor living in expensive parts of London.

Very few of them are native Britons and the best way to help them is to give them council accommodation.

Unfortunately this is not possible given that almost all the council flats and houses in central London have been given to immigrants and asylum seekers.

If this is not treason, I don’t know what is!!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Black Country Patriot BC1959

As memories of the Blair Project seem to flutter away in the breeze for most people, moments of anger and disappointment that flecked his ugly disgraceful premiership are once again part of our every day lives, why? Because the politically engineered Con-Dem (Brokeback) Coalition, arranged so subtly with help from the controlled media before the elections last May, has made even the most apolitical Briton somewhat concerned about the blue print for white British ethnic cleansing just as obvious this time as the last.

Once the British National Party has gone through it’s latest stage of development, leading to a certain maturity after obviously state sponsored attacks from within, and some folk being taken in by some of the oldest tricks in the Communist Political Subversion Handbook, we will literally be the only opposition party left in British politics, and they know it.

So then, Cameron, backed by his genetically modified Liberal partners, and the Biggest Trade Delegation in history, (TV media spin), have been doing deals behind the backs of not only his own traditional Conservative supporters, but the whole of the next generation of British school leavers, including Post Graduates, who are now working behind bars, stacking shelves, or living off friends and relatives whilst facing massive debts. The reality of all this of course is the fact, openly stated by the media that the Indian government has put pressure on Britain to be more flexible in it’s immigration policies.

By flexible, they mean an open door policy. Not only that but with Turkey now being encouraged to enter the near bankrupt Euro-Zone, we will see some 750,000 extra immigrants at least, from that country alone. With some 5000,000. illegals here already, and another 10,000,000 settled here in the last fifty years or so, the true number of non-white British Citizens, could actually be a frightening One Third of the population of the estimated 75,000,000 future populace, considering their phenomenally high birth rates.
Here’s what Migration Watch has to say: There was relatively little migration into Britain (other than from Ireland) until New Commonwealth immigration began in the 1950s. Legislation in the early 1970s was intended to reduce this to a trickle. In practice it continued at the rate of half a million acceptances for settlement every decade. This was counterbalanced by emigration until 1983. The net inflow has grown steadily since then. The total net immigration from outside the E.U. has now reached a rate equivalent to about 1.5 million every decade.

With recent revelations about New Labour’s ”Brave New Britain” coming to light, where even the media proved its limited national worth, and exposed papers suggesting that the Blair project had used immigration to smash the right in Britain, and change the country for ever, it was hoped that Cameron would at least honour some Conservative policies. In April this year, one month before the elections, Cameron told the Mail: Immigration is ‘too high’ and will be reduced to levels last seen in the mid-1990s under a Tory election blueprint to restore Britain’s ‘sense of national purpose. Reducing levels to those of the 1990s would mean around 50,000 immigrants a year would be allowed to settle.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxxU9XaX

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxrOx69d

Please remember that the figures here are simply block numbers, referenced from media and other sources, to show some reality of the then, now, and future outlook for Britain. Immigrants are well known for their love of the ‘Benefits Riviera Of The World’, ie Britain, and thus, any numbers suggested could explode beyond those shown here. Simply put, we are in for a very serious economic, social, and lawless five years. God help the children.

Now Mr Cameron, are you going to take your name off the UAF supporter list? Is Blair, Brown, and in fact anyone in politics still alive when they introduced Globalism into our nation in 1948, going to take responsibility for not only what has already happened to us, but what is happening, and the BLOODY consequences that will without a shadow of a doubt, come to fruition?

All Prime Ministers and every member of this, and all previous governments, their financial contributors, horse whispering foreign advisers, and the increasingly arrogant and aggressive immigrants given opportunities our grand parents could not have imagined, will have to face the wrath of the descendants of the Ancient Briton. This is not a vague threat, or a piece written in righteous anger. It is quite simply, A Promise To Pay The Bearer so to speak. Ironically, that was what we were, as a nation, promised in 1833, when bank notes were made legal tender for all sums above £5 in England and Wales. Thus, in the event of a crisis, the British people would still be able to accept such Bank notes, and its bullion reserves would be safeguarded.

Where are our reserves Mr Cameron? Where is our national, and socio-economic security? Can you tell us Mr Cameron, why you and your shadowy masters and advisers, have now decided to completely destroy this nation? Most people think the answer is obvious… you dare not, and you could not. You have gone abroad, and blatantly reneged on every promise you made, and helped push the Blair Project further. You are a parasite, a traitor, and an enemy of the people Mr Cameron. You are in fact, the absolute proof that in this, and other Western European nations, that we are at the mercy of a multi-headed Marxist Occupied Government (MOG), in the worst economic crisis to hit the world in Eighty Years, yet you are now going to import millions more immigrants into our nation yet again, under the illusion of economic necessity. You are going to enslave us to low wages, and at the same time help the Blair Project along nicely, by robbing our manufacturing and skills base and taking our inheritance from us without a sleepless night.

Readers, imagine this continuating if you will. Think hard and long about your own circumstances. If we have five full years of this coalition, and yet another rump of immigrants arrive on our shores, what will this government do to placate them, and to halt opposition to such ethnic cleansing? That’s right, they will outlaw ALL opposition, and extend the powers of the alien lawmakers that have infested our legal institutions. Add to this the much vaunted benefit system overhaul, which will be used to take more away from our own, and give extra help, homes, jobs and businesses, such as the much needed car washing franchises seen by the thousand around this country of ours. Skilled jobs are already taken by immigrants as it is, so why is it that India, China, and Pakistan amongst others, are so willing to let go of their own skilled workers, nurses, and car wash experts?

Traitor and political rent boy, Tony Blair, who now ponces around the globe making millions and pretending to care about the third world, did not leave the once much loved, and most famous address in history No 10 Downing Street. He simply underwent genetic modification by his political surgeons, changed his name, and we now have a new face for the Blair Project. Do you recognise him Dave? It’s you, yes you. We will remember you, and every single one of the traitors, war-mongers, bullion thieves, and those responsible for aiding and abetting the rape, murder, and ethnic cleansing of our last two generations of white British people. When the men in suits come knocking on our doors Mr Cameron, that is when the real revolution will begin… the Nationalist Revolution.

By BC1959

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As austerity hits native Britons pockets and deep cuts in essential services are imminent, nationalists will be interested to read that asylum seekers seeking permission to stay in Britain are being offered free swimming pool or gym sessions while they wait.

More than 250 people from other countries have so far made use of a special card that gets them into council leisure facilities that residents – and even pensioners – have to pay to use.

Britons wanting to join the scheme – operating in Newcastle – can expect to pay up to £180 a year for the city council’s Leisure Plus card.

But 256 of the city’s 480 asylum seekers have taken up the offer of a free card, at a cost to council taxpayers of £7,000.

Bureaucrats regard the scheme as so successful it may be copied by other local authorities around the country.

Your Homes Newcastle, responsible for housing the applicants, says the scheme prevents users from feeling isolated in a strange country, and encourages them to become part of the community in which they are living.

But TaxPayers’ Alliance spokeswoman Emma Boon said: “Offering one group of people a particular service for free, whilst others, including pensioners, are paying is likely to create divisions in the local community.”

Applicants must be able to prove their asylum seeker status to qualify for the card, which is valid for six months and includes free use of Newcastle’s state-of-the-art Centre for Sport complex.

Steve Murphy, chair of Your Homes Newcastle, said: “We believe the scheme has real economic and social benefits.

“It helps to integrate asylum seekers. This makes Newcastle a more vibrant and diverse place.

Maybe Mr Murphy should consult Newcastle’s long term residents to see if they are happy to allow their city to be enriched.

But we know the answer, don’t we?

The same argument has been used by Labour (Conservatives got there first) to swamp Britain with immigrants in order to make it multicultural, they were well aware that voters would have never approved.

This is why they introduced tough race-hatred laws that make any criticism of immigration a criminal offence (BNP activists know only too well what I’m talking about).

On the bright side this programme may help us to get more supporters up North.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Fiat Currency in the U.S. and us, is it of any of concern to the UK?

Well yes it is! In fact it is a matter of concern not only to us in the UK, but to Europe and the World.

Debt makes profit!

For who, and for what reason?

The ‘who’ are the bankers the moneymen and their puppeteers, and the reason being to burden not just the individual, but Nations saddled with a debt that can never be repaid.

What would happen if you reneged on a mortgage taken out on a house?
You would have your home repossessed, so in a microcosm we have the individual, and in macrocosm we have the world.

Now, do you think the act of an individual bank taking away your home is any different to the World Bank taking possession of a country?
That’s what is happening no matter what country you live in.

Problems meeting the interest payments on loans?
No worries, we can give you more fiat currency so you can repay the loans we gave you with the new loans we are going to give you.
FFS, will you not wake up and smell the coffee, you are being conned to death. Those pieces of plastic you use as credit/debt cards to put food on the table and clothes on the backs of your children are no more than chains that bind you to the banksters. You are no more than serfs.
Credit is debt, and debt is profit.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Certain ideas will only take hold when conditions are right and the time is fast approaching. We will soon see in England what we saw during many years in Northern Ireland and in many countries in Latin America. The centre will vanish erased by an unstoppable economic downturn and the political spectrum will be totally polarized.

This is not about percentages or cuts here and there. We are witnessing a mortal confrontation between two incompatible philosophies. When you want to destroy a building, the quickest way is to destroy what supports the building. Labour created a macrocephalic state to support Labour and we know trade union membership is 57 per cent in the public sector and 15 per cent in the private sector.

Red October is just around the corner. Labour might have preserved much of its powerbase in London but it must prepare itself for a shock since its policy of buying votes with public jobs is about to unravel. Labour’s loudspeaker also known as BBC must also prepare itself for inevitable cuts. In a country where 1.4 million households are having to choose between heating and food, the License fee is a luxury that the country can ill afford.

As they publish the salaries of many public employees, the salaries of Trade Union officers will also be published to unmask the Mandarins who have lived at the expense of British taxpayers via money laundering promoted by the Labour Party.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It is reported that the Home Secretary will be imposing a strict limit on the number of non-EU work permits to be handed out, and it is expected to lead to a sharp reduction in the more than 100,000 migrants and family members who are told they can work here each year.

The cap is being forced through despite protests from some Tory Cabinet ministers, (I wonder how many lobbyists are pushing the Ministers?) they claim it could hit the profits of UK business and Universities.

So is government finally listening to people?

Of course not, there are so many loopholes immigrants can use to sneak in, such as inter-company transfers where big companies move staff from one country to another.

Also there is no mention of new measures to prevent ‘asylum’ seekers coming into the UK, and no indication that the million or so illegal immigrants/asylum seekers (there is no such thing as a legal asylum seeker) living in the UK will be kicked out.

This is hardly surprising as we have pointed out before, immigration and asylum policies are now decided by the EU and Theresa May must accept the will of the unelected EU bureaucrats.

And there is nothing we can do to prevent those with an EU passport coming here, one example being the hundreds of thousand Poles who migrated to the UK for economic reasons (All Balkan states are allowed to work here, Balkanisation by design).

In the last few months as the financial crisis deepened, and it has become harder to find employment in the UK, thousands of Poles left Britain but a study suggests they found the situation to be far worse in their homeland, and around a third could be about to travel for a second time.

One in three of those interviewed by the Polish research company ISQ said that they wanted to work abroad again.

Dr Dorota Wiszejko-Wierzbicka, author of the study, said the relative wealth and the hard economic climate in Poland lay behind the desire to migrate.

“They know that not only is there better pay abroad but there are also more jobs,” she said.

“In Poland barely a third of the returnees surveyed by us have a steady job, and many complain of a hostile Polish labour market. No wonder then that one-third want to leave again.”

Poland weathered the global recession with reasonable success, and it was the only EU country to record economic growth last year.

But it is still plagued by an unemployment rate of 12.3 per cent, and this figure rises to more than 20 per cent in the small towns and rural areas that are home to many of those contemplating packing their bags for a second time.

The results of the ISQ study are supported by similar research carried out in south-western Poland, which found that large numbers or returnees had little or no desire to remain in the country.

Bartosz Trzaskalski, from the Centre for Strategic Consulting and author of the study, said: “With us we found that up to half of the returnees announced that once again they will be leaving for a job abroad within the next two years.”

But the news that Poles coming home after working abroad have trouble finding jobs and settling down will also renew fears in Poland of what demographers and economists have dubbed the “lost generation”.

Having spent many years working in menial jobs in the UK, and now with no skills suitable for the Polish market, economists fear they will become a burden on the Polish state.

Britain absorbed the vast majority of the hundreds of thousands who left Poland after EU accession in May 2004.

It’s not difficult to foresee a new wave of Polish immigration, even if there are no jobs available, because they can still claim benefits and get free health care.

So much for the Tories putting a cap on immigration.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I have to admit that in the last few days I have spent a fair bit of time looking at the emergency budget because I wanted to see how it might affect the election prospects of the British National Party.

I believe there are some aspects of this budget that deserve to be supported, in particular the ones regarding the welfare system.

The Daily Express reported that George Osborne ­is planning a second round of benefit cuts on top of the £11billion annual welfare squeeze unveiled in his ­emergency Budget.

Confirming the coalition Government’s determination to carry out the most radical welfare overhaul in over half a century, the Chancellor sent a stark warning that even more state handouts would be slashed.

His message came as senior ministers defended the hugely ambitious £40billion programme of tax rises and spending cuts announced on Tuesday to save the country from economic disaster.

Britain’s bloated welfare bill – now costing the country nearly £200billion a year – is the Chancellor’s top target for cuts, with housing benefit and other benefits to be curbed.

Mr Osborne said further welfare savings beyond his planned ­£11billion squeeze would ease the pressure to make cuts averaging 25 per cent on public services, including prisons and the police.

He said: “If over the coming months we can find further savings in the welfare budget, then we can bring that 25 per cent number down.

“In the end, that is the trade-off, not just between departments, but also between the very large welfare bill and the departmental expenditure bill.

“That’s why we are having this big public engagement through the spending review process so that as a country we can come to that ­decision collectively.”

Treasury sources last night said Mr Osborne was urging all Government ministers to suggest further ways the welfare bill could be slashed. He said any further savings would be ploughed back into their departmental budgets. A Cabinet committee is due to meet regularly and discuss ­further welfare cuts.

I know I will upset many but I firmly believe that a reform of the welfare system is long overdue and Mr Osborne deserves credit for trying to do that.

Too many people in this country are living on benefits and too many claim disability benefits even when they are fit for work, and the cost to the taxpayer is enormous.

It’s not uncommon to find families in which no one has done a day of work in his/her life, and parents spend their time drinking, smoking at our cost, and in some cases we also pay for their drugs.

Their children often drop out of school with no qualifications other than with an understanding of the welfare system that would put professionals to shame, and follow in their parents’ footsteps by claiming all the benefits they have a ‘right’ to, and in the case of teenaged girls, getting pregnant so they can live all their lives on the dole.

Many of those offsping are also more likely to become violent thugs and criminals, a common occurrence in what we often refer as broken Britain.

The MSM want people to believe that these scroungers are all BNP supporters but nothing could be further from the truth.

Most of them don’t care about politics and actually tend to be hostile towards us even when they live in an area that has been enriched to such an extent that they are the only whites left.

They are the ones who join movements like the UAF or other antifascist groups, something nationalists are only too well aware of.

Of course many oppose reform of the welfare system, because they believe that people only claim benefits because there are no jobs available or are badly paid.

There is some truth in that belief, and forcing people to look for work when there are no jobs is wrong.

Many of them will suffer as they compete with immigrants willing to work for peanuts, and then comes the possibility of a backlash, and rioting on the streets in protest at the iniquitous behaviour of the ruling Junta in allowing our Island to be invaded. The people must awake before it is too late to get back what we once had.

We can only hope this happens sooner rather than later and refuse to accept the multiracial project that has been imposed on them for 50 odd years.

Many of the white-working class showed a long time ago that they know we are suffering from unfettered mass immigration, and they did it by supporting the British National Party.

The four million or so living on the dole who don’t join the white-working class in the struggle to take Britain back clearly don’t suffer any hardship. Yet!!

The overhaul of the welfare system may change that.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Republic of Ireland deserves all it gets, its people were coerced into voting for the Lisbon Treaty, and the Republic is now coming to realise what a nasty and voracious beast it has allowed into its body. Unrest on the streets and turmoil in its Treasury, this is more akin to Greece than the Emerald Isle.

The problem is more prevalent in Greece but then it has had more media coverage, but watch this video and you will notice something strange! This is from a Russian news channel RT News, why has the EUBBC not picked up on it?
I do not recall seeing any coverage on the EU subsidised BBC do you?

Pantherandpolitics

That’s Greece, Ireland and Spain so far, Portugal and Italy are not too happy either.

The money is swilling around in ever diminishing value, ‘quantitive easing’ is in play here and it can go on only so long, the bubble of illusion will burst, and when it does heaven help those countries that wed themselves to the Euro when things looked rosy and the future was milk and honey. Well the milk has turned sour and the honey is running out. I hope and pray that one of the PIIGS goes tits up or much more to be hoped for, the German people say “no more bail outs”. Let the PIIGS sink and then go back to the Lira, Punt, Escudo, Peseta and the Drachma.

Divorce will be messy, but better a clean break and be part of Europe than dragged into the morass of despair and servitude which will be the end result of staying wedded to the EU.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I often think that it’s a pity politicians aren’t held personally liable for their actions whilst in government. At least then we would have the satisfaction of seeing them suffer along with the rest of us when things go wrong. As it is, 13 years of Labour misrule has left this country almost bankrupt, while Gordon and his cronies swan off to tranquil waters, leaving the rest of us to face the vicissitudes of the looming storm.

Remember Gordon’s former boast of ‘no more boom and bust’? The media and leading politicians of the day were almost falling over themselves to reassure us that his were the ‘safe pair of hands’ of a ‘prudent’ chancellor. On becoming PM, he was also obsequiously hailed as the ‘man from the manse’ who was set to change the political climate by ushering in the ‘government of all the talents.’ Meanwhile, New-Labour had consistently and deliberately drained the national coffers dry in a frantic attempt to placate the voters and delude us all into thinking we could get something for nothing, while simultaneously pursuing policies which were and continue to be in direct conflict with the national interest.

The fact is that it was all done with borrowed money- but that didn’t concern them. Brown and the New-Labour government were happy to brush the muck under the carpet because they knew for certain that by the time it came to pay-back day, they would all be out of office. Even if they had won another term, they would have made damn sure, by borrowing yet more, it wouldn’t be their government that would have to do the paying back. It’s easy to be generous with someone else’s money; more especially if you know that you won’t be the person called upon to return it.

The former government has turned the wasting of tax-payers’ money into an art-form! Membership of the EU stings us for millions of pounds a day. Those wickedly unnecessary wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost us dearly too in money- not to mention the lives needlessly squandered in a pointless cause. The price of keeping those who resolutely refuse to work is another drain on the national purse. And for those who want to work, jobs are few and far between because the heavy tax-burden and plethora of unnecessary rules and regulations which have forced small businesses to the wall. As for the vast amount expended on the criminal justice system that specialises on processing malefactors instead of punishing them thus encouraging them to re-offend…. I could go on at length, but you get the drift.

And now, heaven help us, it’s pay-back time. We’re all going to have to pay the price for this continuing madness. Someone the other day quoted me a figure for the national debt liability working out as something in the region of over £30 000 per individual tax-payer. I’m not sure if this includes everyone who pays tax, ie VAT, or whether this is just confined to earners. Even so, it is indicative of a frighteningly penurious scenario to come which we are all going to have to face. Meanwhile, the irresponsible perpetrators will come out of it more or less unscathed with their index-linked pensions, the book deals, the speaking engagements, the directorships and the like. Mr Blair for one seems to be coining it! Obviously, socialism for him is something to be preached and not practised.

But then I suppose if we, the electorate, are so gullible as to have voted these charlatans into power in the first place, we really only have ourselves to blame. And remember where you read it first- the long term economic prospects under the new coalition won’t be any different. Because they won’t change tack on Europe, jobs, the wars, and a host of issues which would make a real difference to the health of our balance of payments. The only remedy as they see it will be cuts, cuts and more cuts. And as always, it won’t be at the top, but rather at the coal-face where the blows will fall. It will be front-line services and the people that so depend on them that will have to bear the main brunt from the blows of the repeatedly falling axe.

Richard Barnbrook http://www.richardbarnbrook.com/

Share this post:

Hide Sites

From ‘rugfish’ on The Home of The Green Arrow. http://tinyurl.com/344s5mm

It may be sooner than you think, that the age of reason will return to European politics before long but certainly before the turn of a new decade. If I was a gambling man presented with the options of complete break up, a two tier system, an Anglo – French – German – alliance, or a new alliance of sovereign nations working together in a co-operative trading union as friendly neighbours, then I think I’d have to go with the latter but it’s anyone’s guess as to precisely what will happen.

How do I know this?

Well I’m guessing of course as I’m not psychic, I’m just a normal human being who understands that when a secret is out, that it doesn’t take long for people to question, mistrust those who kept the secret, and eventually threaten to walk away shaking their heads in disbelief.

So when I read this today when the unelected cardboard cut out politician, EU President Van Rumpwinkle admitted that the people of Europe were conned into accepting a single currency, it sent my EU alarm ringing until it fell off the desk.

This is how it goes….

“Van Rompuy admits citizens were misled about the euro”

The Telegraph reports that EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy has admitted that the “man in the street” was misled about the true economic and political implications of adopting the euro. “Nobody ever told the proverbial man in the street that sharing a single currency was not just about making peoples’ lives easier when doing business or travelling abroad, but also about being directly affected by economic developments in the neighbouring countries,” he said on Tuesday evening. “Being in the ‘Euro zone’ means, monetarily speaking, being part of one ‘Euroland’.”

He added that “We are clearly confronted with a tension within the system, the ill-famous dilemma of being a monetary union and not a full-fledged economic and political union. This tension has been there since the single currency was created. However, the general public was not really made aware of it.”

The article cites Open Europe’s new briefing, “They said it: How the EU elite got it wrong on the euro”, and quotes Open Europe’s Vincenzo Scarpetta saying, “The euro zone crisis is not simply about economic failure but also a breakdown in trust between the political class and European citizens. The EU elite simply got it wrong on the euro.”

Meanwhile, in an interview with Süddeutsche Zeitung, Commissioner for Budgets Janusz Lewandowski said, ahead of his talks with Chancellor Merkel and German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, “I want to see to what extent [German] public opinion has changed his mind about European aims [...] Germans have clearly become more eurosceptic: they believe they must pay for other EU citizens’ mistakes and good life”.

Ah, I bet you’re thinking what’s that got to do with the break up of the EU right?

Okay, I’m either completely off my rocker, I’ve spent far too much time in the garden, I’ve been studying EU lies too long, or I’m completely normal like you and I can see the riots in Greece, and protests throughout the EU, which tell me that people are not happy.

They are striking about anything from the price of bread (cost of living), to immigration, to retirement ages, austerity measures, layoff’s, unemployment, capitalist b’stards who take your eyes out, climate change, aid to foreign countries, GM crops, babies being aborted, babies not being aborted, the age of consent for homosexuals, Islam, oh….and 1,001 other reasons to display why they are totally sick with their governments.

But even with all that I can boil it down to economics as to why the EU will fail because a single currency with fluctuating markets, is quite impossible to hold together unless you have one political system.

It may have dawned on people for instance that Germany and France make most cars as an example, and that Germany has the steel production and Poland is still digging coal whilst some French cars are made there to help keep Poland’s economic head above water. It hasn’t gone unnoticed by French car workers who are out of work either. But there are twenty seven different retirement ages across Europe too, along with mass immigration into every country where jobs are scarce, car workers are out on their ears, and are presumably being told their skills are no good when they apply for that job taken by a foreigner.

It’s another story of course when you look at where the biggest problems lie in Greece, Spain, and Portugal, which just happen to be major holiday and retirement destinations for many Europeans.

Certainly their economies took a major tumble on tourist trade along with their construction industries which are seeing massive areas of empty tables in one time busy resorts, and half built yet vacated properties which were once intended to fund their economic expansions.

So Greece borrowed in order to sustain its economy and Spain has just seized two banks which would otherwise fail for reason of defaulted property loans, owing to…..a lack of ability to meet mortgage payments on….property. (Add retiring Brits to that).

So the sensible thing to do of course would be for Greece, Spain and Portugal, and possibly Italy, to create another currency for markets built not on industry but on tourism.

e.g. Like the Lira, Peseta and Escudo for instance…..like they already had before they were ‘conned’ into accepting a single currency.

It would make sense to do this of course before the entire economy of Europe collapses under the weight of debt which cannot be repaid without an industrial base and plenty of customers, or a restoration of tourist trade. But when the rest of Europe is NOT making its citizens more wealthy for reason their jobs, educations and services are taken up – by foreigners -, and there’s a rather sizeable cost incurred for that along with the 20 million illegal immigrants in Europe, then something has to give quite quickly if the EU single currency is not to fail entirely.

Perhaps that is one reason why investors are buying dollars instead of Euro’s, and why the Euro is tumbling in value but as I say, I’m only guessing.

What do you think?

Oh, by the way don’t go asking Cameron or Clegg, because one hasn’t a clue and the other has that many EU stars in his eyes he can’t see the EU wood for the EU tree which is about to hit him.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Ordinary people were misled over impact of the euro, says Herman Van Rompuy
Europe’s “man in the street” was misled for years over the vast political and economic implications of the creation of “Euroland”, Herman Van Rompuy has admitted.
emphasis mine.
The EU’s president told a selected audience of civil servants and businessmen that the Greek debt crisis and euro zone bailout had come as a nasty shock to ordinary Europeans.
He said the public was not made aware of the full social and economic implications of the currency before it was created.
“Nobody ever told the proverbial man in the street that sharing a single currency was not just about making peoples’ lives easier when doing business or travelling abroad, but also about being directly affected by economic developments in the neighbouring countries,” he said on Tuesday evening. “Being in the ‘Euro zone’ means, monetarily speaking, being part of one ‘Euroland’.” Just because Van Rumpey was a small time politician when the EU was being set up does not make him an innocent in the debacle

Public anger over the cost of supporting other euro zone governments, so far totalling £470 billion in taxpayer funded loans or guarantees, has created new political instability, especially in Germany.
Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor and her coalition government, lost its parliamentary majority two weeks ago following a furious reaction to a Greek bail-out that cost Germany’s taxpayers £19 billion.
Public rage has since grown after Chancellor Merkel was last week forced to push through another £105 billion in loan guarantees intended to shore up southern European governments that most Germans regard as victims of their own profligate spending.
Opinion polling published by Germany’s Stern magazine yesterday found that over three quarters of Germans now believe that their country’s national debt is out of control, a figure that has risen by 62 per cent since the euro bailouts.
In the first public admission of the scale of the popular backlash, Mr Van Rompuy acknowledged that “growing public awareness” of the euro zone’s problems was “a major political development.”
“Today, people are discovering what a ‘common destiny’ in monetary matters means. They are discovering that the euro affects their pensions, savings, and jobs, their very daily life. It hurts,” he said.
José Manuel Barroso, the Commission President, has criticised Mrs Merkel for not taking on opponents to the euro bailouts.
“Until now Germany has been one of the big winners from the euro. More politicians in Germany should say that clearly,” he told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. “It was not Greece, Ireland or Spain who invented the euro. It was a German-French project.” Mr Barroso is annoyed that one of his coterie has expressed a sentiment he does not agree with. Nothing wrong with Spain and Portugal wanting a suck of the teat eh? He was more than happy to have his own country join in but is now upset that the big boys are whingeing about having to support the failing economies of the PIIGS.
The President of the European Council, the body that brings together EU leaders in summits, also confessed that the euro had been flawed from the moment of its creation in 1992, a situation that had not been made clear to voters.it was not flawed they lied to us
“We are clearly confronted with a tension within the system, the ill-famous dilemma of being a monetary union and not a full-fledged economic and political union,” he said. “This tension has been there since the single currency was created. However, the general public was not really made aware of it.” what does Barroso mean, “not really made aware of it”? they lied to us

Research published by Open Europe http://www.openeurope.org.uk/media-centre/pressrelease.aspx?pressreleaseid=139 yesterday highlighted the contradictory statements made by EU leaders during the euro zone crisis, including Mrs Merkel’s assertion two months ago that “there is no possibility of paying to bail-out states in difficulty”. What made her change her mind, could it have been the fact that if one of the PIIGS went tits up the rest of them would follow and the whole monstrous structure of the EU would collapse around their scrawny necks? The euro would be more useful as a bogroll than a currency, and the takeover of the European Nation states by the NWO and its one size fits all totalitarian government would be damaged beyond repair.
Vincenzo Scarpetta, an analyst for the pressure group, said: “The euro zone crisis is not simply about economic failure but also a breakdown in trust between the political class and European citizens Nations. The EU elite simply got it wrong on the euro.” They did not get it wrong, they knew exactly what they were doing, and fortunately for us, circumstances have produced events that reveal the full extent of the conspiracy.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/7767898/Ordinary-people-were-misled-over-impact-of-the-euro-says-Herman-Van-Rompuy.html

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I was pruning my extremely diverse archive and found this little pearl of wisdom from a character called DirtyHarry. I have no idea where I picked this up from, but obviously it struck a chord in me.
So if DirtyHarry cares to make him/herself known to me I would be only too glad to give them a HatTip.

IARF – Immigration and Asylum Relief Fund
DirtyHarry.

I hereby propose that a new fund be set up. This fund will be voluntarily contributed to by any member of the public who feels they have an obligation, duty or desire for the welfare of migrant workers from the EU and asylum seekers.

All welfare services for such individuals will be financed from the fund, including medical costs, housing rental costs, work seeker allowance etc. Immigrants and asylum seekers who are able to find employment, will be expected to contribute a small amount to this fund, in the form of a new IARF tax, this gives those fortunate enough to receive assistance an opportunity to say “thank you” by helping other hapless immigrants and asylum seekers.

This fund helps to ensure that the costs of such services are not unjustly imposed upon the general public but are borne by those who have a desire to assist such people.

Naturally the size of this fund and the degree to which members of the public who have excess money around, contribute, will limit the number of people who are able to be assisted in any given year.

This will address the growing problem of our public services being burdened by ever growing numbers of claimants.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As the MSM are more than ever committed to their smear campaign against the British National Party, nationalists will be delighted to hear that only two national newspapers record a year-on-year slight increase in their circulations last month, according to figures released today by the Audit Bureau of Circulations.

The Independent on Sunday recorded a year-on-year rise in circulation of 1.88 per cent to a weekly average of 168,151 in April, while the Daily Star saw its circulation rise by an almost negligible 0.05 per cent to a daily average of 823,025.

In stark contrast, The Observer, The Sunday Telegraph, The Guardian, The Times and The Daily Telegraph all recorded double digit declines in circulation year-on-year.

National newspaper circulation figures for April 2010 (source ABC)

Figures given are per issue sale for the month and percentage change year on year

Daily Mirror 1,239,691 -6.13

Daily Record 331,012 -7.08

Daily Star 823,025 0.05

The Sun 2,955,957 -0.06

Daily Express 665,731 -8.26

Daily Mail 2,096,074 -3.86

The Daily Telegraph 683,220 -11.81

Financial Times 386,590 -8.19

The Guardian 288,917 -15.83

The Independent 188,119 -7.98

The Times 506,997 -14.18

Daily Star Sunday 348,188 -2.64

News of the World 2,905,780 -1.04

Sunday Mirror 1,124,080 -7.63

The People 530,117 -8.31

Sunday Express 574,323 -9.90

The Mail on Sunday 1,983,283 -4.40

Independent on Sunday 168,151 1.88

The Observer 331,791 -21.30

The Sunday Telegraph 510,146 -10.84

The Sunday Times 1,135,077 -7.09

It’s interesting to see that the newspapers with the sharpest decline are the ones that printed more lies about the BNP.

It’s worth remembering that the Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph used to say BNP members are a bunch of idiots whereas the Times and Sunday Times printed stories based on lies to stop people supporting us.

Clearly nationalists have voted with their pockets and decided to boycott them, and apparently this strategy is working because their decline in circulation is putting pressure on their balance sheets and some are planning job cuts in order to reduce their losses.

This trend is unlikely to be reversed until media tycoons understand that by pandering to the NUJ they are digging their own grave as people have had enough of their lies and propaganda.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites