A few days ago we reported that local politicians were concerned at the rise of the BNP in Hemel Hempstead.

A by-election is to be held in Adeyfield on the 11th of March, the Hemel Gazette reports that (“useful fools”) UAF activists will to be supported by Liberal Democrat MP Richard Grayson, and he will  encourage people to vote against the “far right”  BNP.

Mr Grayson said: “I was pleased to support Unite Against Fascism’s work in Hemel.

“Members of my family were very active in the campaign against fascism in the 1930s.

“I see the campaign against the BNP as being part of that long campaign to defeat racism in this country, and fascism more widely, and I am proud to take part.”

But the BNP claims that one in three households it has visited in Adeyfield has expressed support for the controversial party.

BNP candidate Janet Price said: “About one in three of the people we have visited have been ‘yes’.

“We’ve been getting a very good response from people as we go round.

“Nobody is rude. I’m quite surprised!”

She said they were using the Electoral roll and not going to homes where the names suggested people from an ethnic minority.

“We have a list of names. We won’t go there to aggravate them. It will only cause rows and we don’t want any upset,” she said.

Concerning the campaigners and the UAF she said: “That is their prerogative. We all have our views. It’s a free country.

“We should be able to have our views without causing any hassle.”

MP Mike Penning said: “The BNP desperately need publicity and I don’t want to give them any. I want them to wither on the vine.”

A Facebook group has been started against the BNP in Dacorum and another anti racist music concert is planned.

Mr Grayson may wish to explain why the Limp- Dhims need the help of  the fascist UAF to stop us.

If he is so sure we are the Devil incarnate, he should tell people about his party policies and why they should vote for the Limp-Dhims.

The fact he needs help from a third party indicates to me that he knows the locals don’t agree with him, or his Limp-Dhim policies.

It is well known that the Limp-Dhims want deeper integration by the EU, more immigration, higher taxes, and also want to reduce the age of consent for sexual intercourse, a way to legalise paedophilia by stealth.

How many prospective Limp-Dhim voters would agree with that?

Not many I suspect.

Luckily the UAF will be out causing trouble and the people will be shown who the real fascists are.

Winston Churchill said; “The next Fascists will be the Anti Fascists.”

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

News Shopper.

http://tinyurl.com/yk7rv3a

Do you suffer from pent up rage, do you find yourself annoyed or angry, are you bad tempered and short with others, do you feel uncomfortable or uneasy when strolling peacefully in London?

You probably live in Lewisham…then again it might be Lambeth, or Enfield.

According to the latest statistics, Lewisham is one of the angriest places in London, it came seventh in a survey carried out by ‘The British  Association of Anger Management’. These results are from a study which took place between January and December 2008. Lambeth was top of the league for anger, followed by Enfield.

Inability to handle anger and outrage are highlighted by ‘BAAM’ .                                                                                                                                                  The ‘BAAM’ director Mr Mike Fisher, “I believe issues such as crime, violence, road rage, addiction, eating disorders, depression and many other mental health issues all stem from our inability as a culture to handle or express our feelings, especially those of anger”                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           1) What does he mean by ‘culture’, does he mean the artificial construct we have been forced to live with for the last 60 years, or does he mean the ‘culture’ that existed before the ‘multicultural’ hell that passes for ‘culture’ ?

2) I do not recall fifty years ago when we had a relatively stable society, many of us having problems with eating disorders, or the violence we experience these days, or depression, or addiction, or the myriad other imported problems that, if we were allowed to express our feelings without fear of recrimination, would be laid firmly at the door of the traitors that have led us by the nose down the ‘Road to Perdition’.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          I am deliberate in my choice of words in the last sentence, the idea that we must refrain from commenting about how we feel is the fuel that feeds the fire of resentment towards our betrayers, and so feeds the fire of Patriotism.

3) What do these Boroughs have in common?                                                                                                                                                                                                     I refer you to the previous paragraphs!!

Share

Richard Barnbrook: Calling all ‘Armchair’ Nationalists!!

These days, regrettably, I find myself very much an ‘armchair artist.’ But this I mean that I often find myself toying with ideas for paintings and sculptures, but I simply lack the time for execution. Consequently, despite the inspiration, the creations never get off the drawing board.

I have friends who could fairly be described as ‘armchair’ cooks and ‘armchair’ gardeners- people who are well versed and enthusiastic about their chosen interests, but just seem to lack the application or opportunity to make their ideals become reality.

I suppose it’s a question of priorities. There just isn’t enough time to do everything we would like to do. So necessarily, some activities get relegated to the back burner. Which means in effect, that they simply never happen, despite all our good intentions.

I’m now making a direct plea to all ‘armchair nationalists.’ Those of you out there who are reading this blog, and find yourselves agreeing with most, if not all of what I say. Those of you who have ‘seen the light’- who realise the state that this poor country of ours is in, and who want to see something done about it. Those of you who can see how we have been hoodwinked by the establishment and had changes forced on us without our consent. Those who believe and know that the only party with the guts and the determination to take things forward is the British National Party.

To each and all of you, I would like you to put your hand on your heart and ask yourself, ‘Am I doing everything that I can feasibly do to help the Party, my country and the just Cause that I sincerely believe in? Or am I selling my ancestors, myself and future generations short? Am I leaving it to others to bear the burden that I should be sharing?

I confess that on some days, the demands can seem daunting. But I have always worked on the principle of ‘no regrets.’ By this, I simply mean that at the end of the day, I see myself accountable to my Cause and my conscience. So, come what may, I can always hold my head high and say, ‘I fought a good fight, I did my duty, and what’s more, I did my best.’

Success can and will be achieved. But it won’t come without a struggle. And only if everyone, yes, everyone who feels the same way gets out of their comfortable armchair and lends a hand giving or doing the best that they can. No matter how small and insignificant you feel it is, all that is needed is your best effort. No one can ever ask for more.

So, I am putting out this appeal to all like-minded folk across the nation, from Land’s End to John O’Groats and even beyond! In these days of the internet, no one is too remote to make their presence felt in some way or another. Your help is needed in Barking and Dagenham and it is needed NOW! We need manpower on the streets and we need donations. We need you to show in some way that you care!

Make no mistake, the eyes of the world are fixed on Barking and Dagenham this election-tide. Because this is where our breakthrough will come. And this is also where our opponents will mass all their resources against us. The nationalists of Barking and Dagenham are doing sterling work. But we cannot stand and fight alone. We need YOU to do your bit and do your best, now!

Thank you!

Share

Share

Last Saturday in Barking we had an interesting guest accompany us on our regular leafleting session. Francesca Paci, an Italian journalist. She had heard of me!!, and she wanted to learn more about the BNP.

Nationalists will notice there are no references to the BNP being a bunch of racist thugs, and she gave a picture of us that no one in the UK would ever, ever  dare print.

Her reference to the ‘working class’ is relevant, because ‘La Stampa’ is read by the many thousands who work directly or indirectly for Fiat, the Italian carmaker.

There is an unusual quote that Britons may not know,  ”The working class goes to heaven”.

This refers to an Elio Petri’ film, “The working class goes to heaven”, the story of a factory worker fighting for better working conditions. It was made in 1972, during a time that workers were striking against their greedy employers and trying to change Italian politics.

The film interestingly, puts the spotlight on the indifference of the politicians to the working class; the supposed “Socialists” who should have been supporting the workers, sound familiar?

Ms Paci is the London correspondent of ‘La Stampa’, a Turin based daily; the translated article follows.

By Francesca Paci.

Peter works for a marketing company, Dave works for a construction company, Rory was a shop assistant but he lost his job a few months ago. At 11am they are all in front of the subway station in Becontree, remote eastern outskirts of London, about forty men and women between 30 and 50 years too late perhaps for the appointment with their life but punctual with the only party they believe will promise them redemption. A quarter of a century ago, probably they would have marched under the banner of socialism. Today, victims of economic and cultural globalization they show proudly the British National Party’ badge, the British far right party that from a modest 6% started to capitalize on the lost illusions of the Blair’ dreams.

“Come on boys, the elections are not won by sitting in the living room.” Slicked-back hair, square-toed shoes, full cream suit without an overcoat, Richard BARNBROOK, representative of the BNP in the London Assembly, braving cold to galvanize the militants with the red nose like the factory’ workers before dismissal typical of the first Ken Loach’ movies. The day is long but so is the list of families to contact door-to door and mark with an X in favor, opposed, uncertain. In Barking, a historic Labor party’ stronghold, the BNP already occupies 12 of the 51 seats: if on May 6 local elections, gained another 14, it would have the majority and control of the area, an historic victory for the pariahs of Westminster.

“So far, the electoral system has kept us away from the parliament but we are gaining supports on the ground where the people are tired of politicians, Europe, third-world immigrants,” says Giuseppe De Santis, 30-years old, from Catanzaro, the only foreigner in the BNP. Bob, a former window-fitter now unemployed is waiting with the engine running in the Ford Mondeo with loads of leaflets against the Labor Party that has changed the demography in Barking in its favour, (it was once 95% British working class), by assigning thousands of council houses to immigrants. Until a few months ago, the party’ constitution excluded non-whites from membership but then, after the intervention of the court, an Asian candidate, Rajinder Singh, applied for membership, a Sikh that will never forgive Muslims for his father’s death during the partition of ‘India in 1947. De Santis is Italian but there is no risk he will be confused with the Africans, the Pakistanis, the Chinese that through the neighborhood look with barely concealed suspicion BNP activists at work and, in doubt, he speaks only English.

“Racist and fascist, are the shame of the country ‘heats Margaret H., 58, a former maths teacher, weeding in the garden of the chalet in Roycraft avenue. “It’s about time somebody said no to multiculturalism that steals our work and roots” says, like two thirds of his fellow British, the 31 year old bricklayer Ralph. A door slammed in my face it’s worth another that opens: Ken, how to repair the roof and shakes hands like Ivan Drago in Rocky IV, the blonde Corry, Tony Mason, earrings and jeans with the hem lengthened given to him by someone taller than him.

“The BNP is not only appeals to unemployed workers but also to the middle class, skilled employees who share the fear of immigration and the disenchantment for the political class” notes Daniele Albertazzi, an expert on the new right of the University of Birmingham. Excluded from the mainstream media, the extreme right has specialized in door to door and online activism: “The first-past the post’ system psychologically discourage voters from voting a party without a chance, but if 2 members can make it to Brussels and others become councilors people will believe that things can change even at national level. ” In 1983, 83% of Britons believed that Tory and Labor were different, now this belief is shared by just one voter in five. If the BNP would get somewhere near the 30% majority it needs it would be enough to bring Nick Griffin in Westminster. Difficult, admits Albertazzi, but not impossible. Peter and the others believe it: if the working class did not go to heaven after all, the fault is not theirs.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share

We Nationalists have always known the the UAF thugs are a bunch of idiots, otherwise they wouldn’t came up with a silly story about BNP using foreign models in its leaflets.

This story came up last year during the European elections with the intention of accusing the BNP of double standards as an anti-immigration party using images of non British people in its leaflets.

As all journalists should know the unauthorised use of someone’ picture or photo is illegal and anyone using the image can be sued.

This applies to everyone, not just the BNP, and that is why in the last few years TV programmes use faces that are pixellated to protect the identity of the people being shown.

Do you remember a few years ago a beefeater working in the Tower of London complained because his picture appeared in one of our leaflets.

By using foreign models we can avoid any legal action partly because those people clearly allowed their image to become public domain and so they indirectly authorised anyone to use it, and also because they are foreign they are unlikely to challenge us in any British court.

Even if someone in the UK agrees to appear in one of our leaflets, he/she may change idea and therefore we have to bin all the leaflets containing that picture.

Journalists should know this very well and maybe they do but of course they need to throw everything at us because the date for the local (and maybe general) elections is getting closer, even if this means printing silly stories like this.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

“When the flak gets heavier, you know you are over the target”. When the BNP begins to gather more support in local areas, the local newspapers react hysterically because they believe it’s their “duty” to warn of our threat, and then the usual chorus of condemnation and excoriation from local politicians and community groups ramps up.

The latest example comes from Hemel Hempstead where the support for our party is growing.

According to the Hemel Gazette, the party’s agent Simon Deacon says the newly-formed Hemel Hempstead branch has around 70 members and they could take third place in the forthcoming general election.

“Hemel branch is getting bigger and bigger,” he said.

“There were 200 from Dacorum at the Christmas social.

“In the last Euro elections we polled 3,800 across Hemel Hempstead. In a general election that would probably put us third.”

Mr Deacon, who has a seat on Markyate Parish Council, has spoken out as the BNP fields a candidate in the Adeyfield West by-election.

The 44-year-old, who works for a gardening company, says they aim to fight four or five wards in the next local elections and both Hemel Hempstead and South West Herts constituencies in the general election.

“We’re new to the fight in Hemel. The National Front always used to get good polls in Hemel and we know we can get better polls than them, being more moderate than them,” Mr Deacon said.

But Andrew Williams, leader of Dacorum Borough Council, said while he was concerned at any growth in support for the BNP they remained a minority party.

“I am confident they won’t do well in the elections in Hemel and they will continue to be a minority party that does not reflect the views of the majority,” he said.

“When people are finding it difficult to get jobs they sometimes blame immigration.

“Clearly any growth in support for the BNP is a concern.

“I take the view that as they are a political party they are entitled to stand. It’s the job of the mainstream parties to fight them and ensure they don’t win.

” I can’t think of many people who will agree with their views. They don’t get a lot of support in the town and I hope that continues.

“I think Dacorum is an area where people get on together and we should not let groups like that cause unrest in the community.”

Mr Deacon was a member of the National Front from the 1980s but left after he won a seat in Markyate in 2008.

On his membership of the far right group he said: “I had a good friend of mine who got addicted to drugs and died. I just felt they were the only people who would stand up and be counted about the things at the time.

“I said things I regret. I backed their policy at that time. In the 80s there was no middle road.

“A lot of people in the National Front wanted to be in something else – there was nothing for them.

“I don’t like to be called a racist. The problem with this country is the way it’s being Islamified.

“We would shut the doors now. It’s too full, whatever your background. There’s nearly 70million people in this country.

“The first thing the BNP would do is pull out of the EU.”

Mr Deacon said people from ethnic minorities would be welcome at meetings.

“We’ve had black people come along,” he said.

Racist anti-fash are beginning a campaign in the area and a Facebook group called ‘Stop the BNP in Dacorum’ has been started, an anti racism concert is being organised, and Unite Against Fascism is planning to hold a leaflet drop in Adeyfield.

The action was prompted because the BNP is fielding a candidate in the Adeyfield West by-election taking place on Thursday, March 11.

Music promoter Luke Hinton decided to set up the Facebook group to raise awareness of the situation.

“I did it because I saw no one else has done it. I thought I might as well do it – I feel strongly enough,” he said.

“I don’t want the BNP winning seats in my home town.”

So far the group has 75 members, including would-be Liberal Democrat MP for Hemel Hempstead Richard Grayson.

Mr Hinton, 29, said groups like the BNP only get in if people do not vote.

“If everyone in Hemel went out and voted and the BNP won a seat that would be a true reflection – and I would probably leave town – but I think it’s people hide their heads in the sand,” he said.

“The BNP will only win seats if people aren’t voting.

“That’s why the group was set up – it’s opening people’s eyes.

“The number of people I’ve spoken to who were not aware the BNP were standing.”

Mr Hinton – who organises Juicebox music nights in Hemel Hempstead, St Albans and Watford – is also planning a ‘Love Music Hate Racism’ gig ahead of the general election.

“The idea of it is to put out there that everyone is pretty much equal – it doesn’t matter what colour, creed or sexuality – everyone has the same rights,” he said.

“It’s people standing up and saying: ‘We don’t want to live in a town where people are discriminated against’.”

Mr Hinton, like many other treacherous liberals fails to understand that many native Britons don’t want to be neriched and don’t want Hemel Hempstead to become another Hackney or Newham.

This is why the Labour party, when it planned to swamp Britain with immigrants to change its social fabric, decided to accuse as racist anyone who dared to oppose this plan and passed tough anti-racism laws that make such criticism a criminal offence.

Of course if Mr Hinton wants to leave the town he is more than welcome, I’m sure the local BNP branch will pay him for a ticket to leave not just the town but the country.

I think we should be grateful to Mr Hinton for the free publicity we are getting, at least more people are getting to know about us.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

It has been announced that an Independent Group has been formed to contest elections in Barking and Dagenham. The Leader of the Group, John (fibber) Denyer along with Cllr  Fred (give them both barrels) Barnes obviously hope more sacked Labour Councillors will join them in there anti NuLabour project. These brave people who have seen the light get the support of the BNP and one would think surely some of their ex Labour chums will be joining them shortly. One could however argue that they would be better off in the BNP and more likely to get elected.

As a side note of the 28 declared candidates to stand for Labour in Barking 12 of them will be from a foreign background. Two more needed and that will make it half of the candidates in Barking. As a foreigner Margaret (the Egyptian) Hodge certainly does not believe it is a problem that foreigners have the whip hand over Indigenous Britons.

Labour is a party of foreigners, bought and paid for by foreigners, to rule over the British people. Vote BNP in 2010.

Share

Dear Members and Supporters,

On Saturday 6th March the National BNP Road-Show arrives in London. London BNP with the Party Chairman, Nick Griffin MEP, will be hosting the event which will take place after the National Day Of Action in Barking and Dagenham. The event will be held in East London and the start time approx 5pm.

ROAD-SHOW & FUND-RAISER

This year’s Road-Show tour with a General Election looming and the the Equalities Commission membership ban means we have to pull out all the stops to make sure this event is a GREAT SUCCESS. To fight a good General Election campaign (30 constituencies) and to ensure we get Nick Griffin (Barking) and Michael Barnbrook (Dagenham) elected we need to raise money like we have never before. Remember after these elections there will not be another election in London for a whole TWO YEARS. The time to get involved and help is NOW.

An enormous amount of time and effort has been put into this tour by Central Office in order to provide YOU with professional and enjoyable patriotic entertainment!  The ROAD SHOW will feature an address by the Chairman Nick Griffin, an audio visual show, a cabaret type group singing all your old favourites, new patriotic material from the BNP’s own superstar Joey Smith. There will also be a sing-song with classic tunes associated with Britain’s Glorious past.

Meet your Candidates: We are asking that as many General Election Candidates as possible attend this event. The Party Chairman will want to meet you personally and so will the London BNP team.

Tickets have been given to all organisers across London to sell to members and supporters and are priced at £5. Don’t fear if you cannot get hold of a ticket before the event or if your organiser has sold out, you will be able to pay on the door with ID. If you have family and friends who would also like to come along bring them as well.

All monies raised during the event will be passed onto the London Treasurer Charlotte. London BNP will then decide where the money raised for the region will be spent. The money will probably be spent in the constituencies where we stand to get a good vote, increase our membership and where we are standing local election candidates.

A lot of effort has been put into this show to raise funds for the regions and boost morale, now it’s down to you to do your bit. SEE YOU THERE. Please make sure you bring your credit card/cheque book/donation.

Call 07742749614 or write to  london@bnp.org.uk for further information.

Share

When Trevor Philips, Guyana-born Reichsmarshall of the EHRC started his legal action against the BNP because of our membership rules, the Jewish community attacked him for this move because they rightly saw it as an attack on freedom of association, a basic human right.

Now is the rurn of the black community to be upset by Mr Phillips.

Here is an article published in ‘The Voice’.

It’s worth reading as nationalists can see how this arrogant man, who is not supposed to be in this country in the first place is making enemies everywhere.

“Those whom the Gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. I refer here to the Equalities and Human Rights Commission led by Trevor Phillips.

This government quango has been on a downward spiral since its inception. Only hours old and there was an exodus of senior staff all complaining about Phillips’ style.

Day-after-day this quango bombed. Phillips announced that the British police were no longer institutionally racist eliciting a war cry from those of us who campaigned, beginning in the early sixties, against police malpractice towards blacks.

Judge McPherson condemned the Metropolitan Police as such and laid out a programme to improve its performance.

Trevor Phillips, neither judge nor activist, negated McPherson’s findings and offered his own. At the same time several of his senior members resigned from their jobs with a torrent of criticism against the leader.

Quite recently black staff at the Commission complained that they were being paid less than whites for the same jobs, leading a wag to change the name of the organisation to the Inequalities and Human Wrongs Commission.

There was more to come. Phillips scrambled up to his pulpit and announced that he was advising the British National Party (BNP) to change its constitution which excluded blacks from membership.

Otherwise, he warned, Nick Griffin and the other BNP goons would be taken to court.

Any sane mind would assume that there exists a long queue of black people and Asians knocking at Griffins door ready to sign for the expulsion of themselves from the UK to the countries from which we came.

In fact, since the BNP opened its doors to black and Asian membership only a single individual signed up: one Rajinder Singh a retired maths teacher who is 78- years-old.

Now retitled, the Inequalities and Human Wrongs Commission, Phillips dug into its budget, hired lawyers to perpetuate this farce. Rajinder Singh is a Sikh, a tribe from the Punjab in India. He is unlike every Sikh whom I have known over the last fifty years.

They settled in Southall and have registered their mark on the anti-racist struggle. They fought the National Front, the precursor to the BNP chasing them out of Southall.

They worked largely at Heathrow airport and went on strike spontaneously causing havoc at their places of work.

Rajinder Singh tells us that his brother was murdered in India during the division of that continent into India and Pakistan. He hates Muslims which he explains led him into the arms of the BNP. ‘Him one’, if I am allowed to choose a phrase form the Jamaican vernacular.

I do not believe for one nano second that Phillips and his white tribe will stop at the BNP.

Do not be surprised if he turns on the Black Police Association in demanding that that they too include a mass of white policemen into their midst.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The times are getting tough for David Cameron, the man who wants all of us to integrate into the Muslim way of life.

According to a recent poll the Conservative party have a lead of only 2% over Labour and many thinks that Gordon Brown now has a good chance of staying Prime Minister.

Such a reversal of fortunes would be very embarrassing for the Tory leader, especially when the present government is the most unpopular this country has had in the last 40 years.

So it is not surprising that the Conservatives are trying to woo the traditional Tory voters who are more rightwing than the present party leadership, and it explains why they are putting out leaflets saying the floodgates had been opened to mass immigration.

Critics say the flyers are alarmist and misleading because they imply limits could be imposed on entrants from EU countries such as Poland.

Last night, the party’s frontbench was forced to distance itself from the hard-hitting material, which was put out under the name of Cameron’s home affairs spokesman, Andrew Rosindell.

It bears a picture of him and Mr Cameron,  it says immigration has caused a population explosion, and declares “we simply cannot go on like this”.

Circulated in Rosindell’s Romford constituency, it also suggests that the Tories would impose new transitional controls on the right of nationals of the new EU member states to work in the UK.

Such controls already exist for Bulgaria and Romania, but retrospective limits on other eastern European states, such as Poland and the Czech Republic, would be illegal under EU law.

The pamphlet, which features two Conservatives of Asian ethnicity, also declares that “foreign criminals should be removed from Britain” and features pictures of “hate preachers” Abu Hamza and Omar Bakri Muhammad.

Rosindell said last night: “I did not write or approve this councillors’ flyer. Immigration is an important issue but, as David Cameron has made clear, we must be careful with both the facts and the language we use.

This flyer falls short on both counts, and I shall be pointing that out to the councillors.” However, the material stated that it was “promoted” by the MP.

Meanwhile, Loanna Morrison, the Conservative prospective parliamentary candidate for Bermondsey and Old Southwark, who is black, posted a controversial piece on the political blog, Conservativehome.

“Britain is full, declares Nick Griffin at every opportunity, and he is right,” she wrote.

As many nationalists know Romford is a place where the BNP has a lot of potential supporters and it is no coincidence this leaflet was circulated in that area.

So the Conservatives are talking tough to steal votes from the BNP.

Haven’t we hear this before?

You will remember that Margaret Thatcher used a similar slogan to take away support from the National Front.

However the situation in 1979 was completely different and the trick is not going to work this time, because the BNP is not the NF.

Telling us that a Tory government would put a limit on immigration is a big porkie, given that is the EU who decides on that matter and no one can limit the amount of people with EU passport coming in the UK.

Strangely neither Mr Rosindell nor Mr Cameron say a word about illegal immigrants and no one in the party is attacking Boris Johnson for his support of an amnesty for the one million or so who are not supposed to be here in the first place.

Mr Cameron could say that he is against such an amnesty, and that he will do everything to kick them out but his silence on that proves once again he is a liar.

We will remind our supporters whenever we go out leafleting canvassing, and holding paper sales and the task will be quite easy as Boris Johnson is on our side.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

We must be doing something right!

When the flak increases you know the target is close… The flak is getting heavier.

A few days ago we reported that the NUJ had launched a new pressure group aimed at exposing the “racist” nature of the BNP.

This is an article written by James Macintyre in the New Statesman on the 24th of February.

Nationalists are advised to read it in full because there is something that needs to be exposed about this anti-democratic campaign:

“Last night, a lively rally took place at the ‘Amnesty International’ headquarters in east London to launch a new pressure group called Expose, aimed at sharpening media scrutiny of the British National Party.

The organisation, whose work-in-progress web site is here, and of which I am a founding member, owes its inception to the hard work of a number of NUJ representatives, especially David Crouch of the Financial Times. The idea of it emerged after the BNP gained two seats in the European elections last year, and after its leader’s subsequent appearance on BBC1’s Question Time.

I would urge anyone opposed to the BNP to sign up.

Speakers at last night’s rally included our very own senior editor, Mehdi Hasan; Sunny Hundal, the editor of Liberal Conspiracy; Peter Hain, who bravely criticised Question Time for airing Griffin; Michelle Stanistreet, the NUJ’s deputy general secretary; Pat Styles of Bectu, the media and entertainment union; and Weyman Bennett, the joint secretary of ‘Unite Against FascismFreedom’

Mehdi opened proceedings with a pessimistic take on the current situation, declaring that “we live in dark times” and dismissing the “piss-poor” journalism of the BBC’s coverage of the BNP in the past year. Mehdi’s main message was a powerful warning against the “normalisation” of the BNP.

Sunny sought to expose various “myths of the right”, including that a fall in immigration would result in a fall in racism, pointing out that racism was still a small but present element of British society before enhanced immigration.

Peter Hain, the veteran anti-racist campaigner, issued a characteristically strong rallying call against allowing the “unique” BNP an “uncontested platform”.

Michelle Stanistreet gave a fascinating insight into the mindset of the newspaper group for which she used to work, the Daily Express under Richard Desmond, which — she said openly — simply told “lies” and made up so-called “investigations” about immigration and asylum.

Pat Styles cut through the phony respectability and “modernisation” of the current BNP, pointing out that its members are a band of criminal “skin-head thugs”.

And Weyman Bennett made the thoughtful point that intellectual arguments against the Nazis — including by Albert Einstein — did not stop the slaughter of six million Jews.

The latter point was in response to one of the few dividing lines that emerged during the meeting: over whether or not the BNP should always be engaged with. Despite warnings of being seen as censors, the consensus appeared to be that freedom of speech was of course to be backed at all times, except when it involves the (illegal) incitement of racial and religious hatred of millions of people.”

‘Amnesty International’ (AI) is a charity, and its aim is to fight torture, and the abuse of human rights around the world.

In the past although, it has been accused of double standards, because it refused to publicise torture in certain countries.

Now there are some questions that need answering.

The British National Party, far from supporting political violence, is victim of violence from the UAF, and UAF violence towards members of the BNP is akin to a dictatorship. So why have AI chosen to take side with groups that see the use of violence as legitimate action?

And as a rider to this. Is it legal for a charity to be involved in political activities?

This is something that we want to know and we urge anyone who can help us with that to post suggestions on our comments’ section.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The electoral campaign in Barking & Dagenham has caught the attention of Ugandan newspapers.

The Daily Monitor reports that the Conservative Party has endorsed a Ugandan, Mr Richard Ssemitego, to contest the Eastbury council election in Barking and Dagenham.

Mr Ssemitego’s candidature was announced last week at Bangladeshi Women Association Community Hall in Barking at a function attended by London Mayor, Mr Boris Johnson.

“The most frequent question I am being asked on my campaign trail is about immigration. English people are tired of emigrants in their country and they demand my party’s policy about immigration and yet I am one of them, it is a bit tricky to answer,” he told Daily Monitor on telephone from London yesterday.

Mr Ssemitego,35 will be in a tussle with the incumbent Mr James Edward McDermott Labour Party, Mr Jeffrey Steed the British National Party, Ms Dianne Patricia Challis Liberal Democrat Party, and Mr Ashley Mcllroy UK Independent Party.

In the 2006 elections, Mr McDermott garnered 965 votes in a race that attracted 11 contenders. Mr Ssemitego is currently a Project Manager with Residential Redrich Community Housing Limited in Ilford.

He was campaign manager for Vice President Prof. Gilbert Bukenya in Masuliita town in the 2006 Parliamentary elections.
Elections are slated for May 6 in all London Borough and local authorities. Fifty one councillors form Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council.

It’s  is worth noting that this news was ignored by MSM in the UK and we should give credit to this Ugandan newspaper for reporting this news in a balanced way that would be unthinkable in Britain.

The parachuting of Mr Sseemitego  by the Conservative Party shows that the Tories are worried about us, and will appeal to any minority group to bulk out the votes for them, we know from experience that immigrants vote for their own, and the balkanization of British politics continues.

We all know the Tories are committed to swamping this country with immigrants, just like Labour, and do please remember that Boris Johnson wants an amnesty for the million or so illegal immigrants living here.

The reason Mr Sseemitego finds the question tricky to answer is not because he is an immigrant (I’m Italian but I’m a BNP officer) but because his party plans to deceive the voters on this issue.

Mr Ssemitego could say, if he was genuine that even though he is an immigrant he wants to stop benefits and council houses going to asylum seekers because it is unfair that immigrants who have never abused the system; and he wants illegal immigrants kicked out of the UK as they have broken the law.

Immigrants who came here 30-40 or more years ago agree with us on that, and we know they vote for us because unlike other parties we go out on the streets and talk to people.

What is the position of the Tories on that?

We know the answer, don’t we? Deathly silence!!!!

The other question to be asked is, what are the Tories doing selecting an African in the first place?

Yes the Conservative’ wants to modernise but they also know people tend to vote along ethnic lines and clearly a black candidate would attract much more support from the African living in Barking & Dagenham that a white.

So much for a colour blind society.

Just a question: Will this Bangladeshi Women Association be forced to accept white males as members?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

I apologise to the person who wrote this article, I think I know who it was, but age memory fail me, I have searched my history and could not find a connection. I found it early Sunday morning I was very tired, and forgot to link. If the writer wishes to claim credit please post a reply and the relevant blog.

This is a reply to Dr Sean Gabb of ‘The Libertarian Alliance’ from the ‘unknown writer’.

On Monday, August 24th 2009, the British Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) began legal proceedings against the British National Party (BNP). Its cause of action is that the BNP restricts membership to white people…

This is a politically-motivated prosecution. The BNP has long upset the people who now rule Britain. Its denunciations of mass-immigration and of multiculturalism disrupt what would otherwise be an almost smooth wall of praise—or at least of caution—by the other parties.
Despite universal condemnation in the media, the BNP has made considerable gains during the past few years in local elections, and managed to win two seats in June this year to the European Parliament. It may win a seat in the British Parliament at the next general election. Stopping the BNP is high on the agenda of the powers that be.

All well and good, and support from all quarters is welcome, but I take issue with some of Dr Gabb’s subsequent comments:

This being said, shutting down a political party simply because it dissents from the established multicultural faith is not something that is yet done in Britain. It is too openly an attack on freedom of speech… [The] authorities are frightened to make a direct attack on freedom of speech. Instead, they are relying on laws that abolish freedom of association.

Doesn’t this imply, contrary to Dr Gabb’s claim, that ‘freedom of speech’ is not so fundamental an issue as freedom of association? Good luck winning your right to free-speech from a hostile state if it only permits you to act individually.
There are no white equivalents of Operation Black Vote or other ethnic advocacy groups.

This should be fleshed out a bit, it is the very reason for this attack on the BNP: the regime cannot allow a collective public voice to Whites as a whole or the native Britons specifically because our settled opinion is “No more race-replacement please!” How would the regime respond to such a demand on our behalf from the BNP? “But your race-replacement is necessary because …” — Because what? The BNP must be silenced because the establishment cannot justify its programs the BNP opposes.

The next Conservative Government will fail to reverse the disasters that Labour has brought on the country. This is because the Conservatives do not even intend to try for a counter-revolution. When the failure has become manifest, people will turn to the only alternative party that has forthrightly denounced the Labour revolution and has an existing electoral base. This will be the BNP… I fear that the BNP will, by default, become the only viable champion of counter-revolution… I can easily imagine how the BNP might replace the useless Conservatives as main opponents to what has been done to this country.

Become? Replace? The BNP already IS the only viable champion of counter-revolution. So why doesn’t Dr Gabb get behind them now? He explains:

The problem is that the BNP and much of its leading personnel used to be national socialists. There are too many published statements in praise of Hitler or denouncing the Jews…

Of course, people change their opinions over time. Middle-aged men are not necessarily to be judged on what they said or wrote in their late teens. That excuse has been made and accepted for the Ministers in the Labour Government. Many of these in their younger days were Trotskyite street bullies. Peter Mandelson, who is effectively deputy Prime Minister, joined the Young Communist League three years after the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia, and used to sell the Communist Morning Star. John Reid, who was a Home Secretary in the Blair Government, was a member of the Communist Party in his late twenties, and was noted for his admiration of Josef Stalin…

A man can deny the Soviet holocaust—or even admit that it happened but try to justify it—and remain in good standing with the media and educational Establishments. The slightest whisper of approval for the lesser horrors of National Socialism, and a man is tainted for life… I can also imagine how the movement then led by the BNP might be smeared and discredited out of existence.

This is an absurd excuse for not backing the BNP. Dr Gabb is way too savvy to think it makes sense. The double standard does not enforce itself for its own ends. It is a tool of human agents pursuing their own ends thereby. Enoch Powell could not credibly be labelled a Nazi or former Nazi but after the ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech his career was smeared and discredited out of existence. Dr Gabb is right that for many people this strategy puts nationalism beyond the pale, but our response should not be to wait until the regime stops doing it — it won’t — the answer is to defy their smears and threats and get wholeheartedly behind the most prominent public champions of counter-revolution: the BNP.

Share

£1026 was raised for the Croydon/Sutton branch’s election campaign at the meeting held in a friendly local pub, chaired by Tony Martin. The audience were treated to a fascinating speech by the fine nationalist orator Jonathan Bowden, followed by a local update by branch organiser Charlotte Lewis. Thanks to Anna Martin [catering], Barry Rogers [security], Peter North and Mark Skinner [driving].

BNP cake

l-r Tony Martin, Jonathan Bowden, Charlotte Lewis

The branch is contesting three parliamentary constituencies and twelve council wards.

Share

London BNP will be holding an important rally and fund-raiser on Saturday 6th March 2010.

This rally will aim to encourage people to get behind the ‘Battle of Barking’ campaign and raise much needed funds for our fight in pushing back Labour in the General Election.

You will not want to miss this – it will be the best and most talked about event London BNP has seen for along time.

There will be live music, entertainment, dancing, sing alongs – it will be an excellent event.

The Party Chairman, Nick Griffin MEP will be there to give an important key note speech.

Admission is £5 and there will be a bar and a buffet. Tickets will be with your organiser shortly. Or get them directly from the London Organiser Bob Bailey 07742749614.

This will be a fundraising event – so don’t forget to bring your cheque books and credit cards!

More details regarding the event will be released shortly.

Share

When the EHRC started legal action against the British National Party, ‘Spiked’, an online magazine close to the Jewish community, criticised the move, they saw it as an unacceptable attack on freedom of association, a basic civil right.

After the BNP changed its constitution Tim Black wrote an article in which he described this decision as a dark day for our democracy as he sees a dangerous precedent that should set alarm-bells ringing.

Mr Black is chock full of hatred for us, as can be seen in previous missives from his poison pen, but this hatred of the BNP makes his message more credible.

We repost the article here as he has more common sense than many fat-cat liberals.

Last month the BNP were told by a central London county court that unless they changed their membership requirements, those state-sponsored crusaders at the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) would take them to court under the 2003 Race Relations Act. So, this Sunday, at a fractious Extraordinary General Meeting in Essex, the BNP agreed, for the first time, that non-whites could become bona fide members of the BNP.

A victory for anti-racism? A triumph for equality and fairness? Very few seemed to see it that way. Anti-racism campaign group Searchlight called it a ‘meaningless gesture’, before pointing out that ‘no one seriously believes that thousands of black and Asian Britons will now be queuing up to join Nick Griffin’s party’. ‘The BNP is racist. Racism is an attitude, not a legalistic nicety’, declared The Times leader comment: ‘Mr Griffin made clear that the vote was merely an acknowledgement of “legal reality”. The party does not throw off a history of ideological conviction by acquiescing in what the law demands.’

National secretary of Unite Against Fascism, Weyman Bennett, was equally sceptical: ‘I think that regardless of the vote, the changes are cosmetic and have only happened because the courts forced them to stop racist practices.’

Such criticisms are understandable. Seeing as it’s still the BNP, the party will remain a refuge for racist cranks and loons regardless of the entrance policy. And in that sense, the changes to its membership criteria are ‘meaningless’ and ‘cosmetic’. But that doesn’t mean that what happened here was not significant. In fact, what the EHRC did was highly significant. By threatening a political organisation with civil legal proceedings unless it changed its constitution – a constitution which reflected that group’s beliefs – the state is effectively deciding the nature of opposition in the political sphere, what views can be tolerated, and what views can’t.

That the object of state-enforced configuration is the BNP ought not to detract from what is a serious affront to democracy. Yes, the BNP holds obnoxious views, and yes, its membership and employment policy was repellent – but freedom of speech, and its accompaniment, the freedom to associate with those whom one agrees with, ought not to be negotiable. Just because in this case it’s the freedom to hold racist opinions, and to associate with those who hold similarly abhorrent views, it does not mean that fundamental democratic principles should just be abandoned.

And freedom of association is just such a fundamental democratic right. It means that not only are we free to decide what we believe, to freely express our beliefs, but that we are also free to organise ourselves around those beliefs. And that is exactly what the BNP – an association of racists – did, and ought to be free to continue doing so. None of this is to approve of a group like the the BNP. Hence, just as the BNP are free to come out with immigrant-baiting rubbish, so those who don’t agree with such views are free to organise against this lowdown form of politics.

Judgement of, and argument against, the views and beliefs of political associations like the BNP is born of a vital political sphere, a public realm in which we are free to exercise not just our right to speak our minds but to join forces with those who have like minds. And it is precisely such a sphere that the opportunistic posturing of the state, in the guise of the EHRC, is now denigrating. Instead, by deciding on the forms that political associations are allowed to take, they seem intent on imposing a political straitjacket on democratic debate.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The MSM are busy rubbishing the BNP again.

They are accusing us of being a bunch of “violent thugs” after Dominic Kennedy (Nice pink hair tint by the way Dom, should it have been ginger?…) was ejected from our EGM last Sunday.

Mr Kennedy said he was assaulted, yet the Police service (sic) was present at the venue and no arrests were made, but  the Times keeps lying anyway.

Nationalists will recall that last year a so called “writer” for The Times published an article about our Chairman Nick Griffin, accusing him of calling his dogs Ann and Frank. (Good grief, do they still believe Gerry Unablegable?)

You will also remember I am sure, that days before the European elections the Sun published the image of a supposed BNP leaflet saying we wanted to kick the Gurkhas out of the UK.

It was another lie, in fact the article was withdrawn from the Sun’ website but it cost us thousands of votes because the apology came well after the elections.

They know that the slander laws do not apply to a political party, and unless the slanderous statement is against an individual they get away with it, and the damage is done.

So removing Mr Kennedy from a press briefing was the right thing to do.

As for the article published last Saturday, I said before that I was present and I testify that what they printed is completely false.

Fiona Hamilton defended The Times’ position, saying that they have the right to expose us.( As the only voice prepared to stand up and be counted?).

Not one of us expects any part of the MSM to support us, but whereas we accept criticism, we don’t accept attacks by hacks based on lies.

But the funniest part of this present campaign against us is that, after we changed our constitution, they still accused us of being racist, and those constitutional changes only happened because we had been forced to do it by the EHRC.

Fair enough, we have changed our constitution but why don’t thay attack Trevor Phillips for wasting huge amounts of taxpayers’ money to force a change and then still call us racist ?

Could it be, that no matter what the BNP do it will never be enough for Herr Phillips and his henchpersons?

We never wanted this change in the first place but clearly they found it more profitable to attack the victim and not the culprit.

Might it be that they are scared Herr Phillips (paymaster) would call them racists?

It’s obvious the establishment is scared of us, not a small achievement for a party made up of “useless idiots” as Andrew (How superior am I) Gilligan thinks.

But what is it they are scared of?

The truth of course, but not just the truth about immigration.

For years we have been told that we should be  proud of our diversity, and what makes Britain great is that people from different ethnic backgrounds live together in harmony.

Despite the best efforts of  the MSM to convince us of that lie, we know it is not true, and not only the native Briton recognise it as a lie.

Blacks and asians who came here 20-30 years ago resent the influx of newcomers and many of them think there are too many immigrants.

Such concerns have been brushed under the carpet but the elephant in the room has not disappeared just because they said it had.

Maybe their real fear is that some asians and blacks will join our party and make it impossible to stop us.

I have pointed out before that anyone, regardless of race who agrees with us that this country is full and it’s time to kick out illegal immigrants, stop benefits and refuse council houses to asylum seekers thinks the same way as us.

Before the constitution change anyone promoting these policies could be accused of being racist even if  has nothing to do with race.

We all know the establishment have used racism as an excuse to clamp down on nationalism in the last 50 years but still attacks on us comes from that angle.

You might remember that BNP supporters were arrested a few years ago for distributing a leaflet explaining the benefits and perks given to asylum seekers.

Although the leaflets had nothing to do with race, but were aimed at asylum seekers of whatever hue, the arrests were made under the race hate laws.

The new constitution will change that, and no one will be able to accuse us of stirring up racial hatred. because even if just one black or asian agrees with us Herr Phillips will be unable to use the race card against us.

Blacks and asians cannot be accused of being racist and they know it.

Once the racist tag is dropped they will find it very difficult to smear us.

Time will tell if we are right but our experience in Barking supports the argument.

Richard Barnbrook collected signatures for his campaign on knife crime and a good number of those signatories were black.

They knew exactly who he was, but despite it they supported his campaign regardless of his political beliefs.

Whatever Fiona Hamilton writes about us, the people in Barking know the truth and they will be not blinded by her lies.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The self-appointed, pompous and sententious Mathew D’Ancona loves any excuse to stick his verbal knife in the BNP’s ribs and whitter on in vitriolic and baseless attack, endlessly, in hugely self-important style as if he and only he is suddenly the guardian of Britain’s Social Conscience.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23805912-beware-the-bnp-has-never-been-more-dangerous.do

This time around, his focus is the BNP’s fairly natural decision to admit non-Caucasian members: always remembering that this perhaps un-natural decision was forced by the threat of legal action from that bastion of Left Wing Ideology and wannabe creators of NuLab’s Pie-in-the-Sky Utopian egalitarian multicultural Shangri La, the Equality and Human Rights Commission: you know, that cumbersome monolith determined to destroy the remnants of what was a once proud and great nation.

D’Ancona meanders on, foaming at the mouth about BNP’s security apparat: and thereafter maintains the party has never lost in roots in knuckle dragging Neanderthals etc: well, Mathew, I don’t know if you have been out for a pint, lately, but since you proudly boast you reside in London’s East End, then you will probably have noticed that most pubs these days boast a couple of your specimen Neanderthals on the door: let’s face it, any publicised BNP private event becomes the instant target for a would-be invasion from those well behaved groups such as the UAF Rent-A-Mob!

Now such as the UAF were seen, for example, trying anything to storm the BBC hallowed portals when Nick Griffin appeared on question time: and this bag of scruffy, quasi-literate unshaven, body-pierced, heavily tattooed cagoule-wearing misfits are not actually the precise type one would want to take home to meet Mum for tea!

However, in the spavined and myopic gaze of the superior being, D’Ancona, no doubt their sartorial eccentricities and lack of ablutionary exercise can be ignored in the common cause of perpetuating the Ivory Tower miasmic fantasies of the Bleeding Heart Lefty Do-Gooders.

This constant denigration of BNP and its membership and repetition by the far left of the skinhead dramas of days of yore, flies in the face of example: France became so mired in party politics for the pure sake of politics and self-elevation by politicians, that in 2002, Jean Marie Le Pen chased Chirac into second place in the first round of the presidential election! Chirac polling 5.6 million and Le Pen, 4.8 votes.

Must we then conclude that France is a nation of knuckle-draggers?

Far from it; it is now a far more cultured and stable country than Britain!

In an earlier critique of Mr D’Ancona’s nonsensical rant, I suggested he wake up and smell the coffee: the core-reason so many seriously consider voting BNP is simply because they are wholly disenfranchised, ignored, disregarded and marginalized by a political system in meltdown: yet simultaneously, expected to shoulder the lion’s share of the taxation burden which enables it!

This ignorant scribe then goes on to one again recount the utter myths of the benefits of what he calls “Economic Migration”: and avers Britain is a sort of temporary refuge: a place where the vision and essential national structure never actually existed: and then whitters away, listing a string of immigrant groups who “made” Britain.

As one who can proudly trace his antecedents to Tudor England, I personally take grave exception to such calumny!

His ignorance of British social and ethnic history and the specific history of migration to these shores is absolutely astounding in its fallaciousness!

He reels off racial groups such as Jews, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, Normans and even Huguenots: however, as always with these attempted and facile attempts at justification he misses four critically important points. First most of this migration was archaic; second, the incomers brought economically important craft skills – the Huguenots, for example bringing essential abilities for the time, in gold and silver smithing, metal working, weaving and leather working; next, they all integrated, learned the local language and added to it.

Finally, there is the little matter of time scale.

The mass migration we have suffered since it’s beginning in the late 1960s, accelerated throughout the 1970s: and reached its unsustainable peak once NuLab came to power, from 1997 onwards: to the point where over 30% of people living in London were not born in Britain!

Passing through the Clapton-Beck concert, D’Ancona then illustrates his utter total slavering ignorance of the roots and genesis of modern popular music: desperately trying to award absolute accreditation to Black music and musicians!

Neatly bypassing Appalachian folk roots and how these owed their true origin to Irish and Scottish immigrants way back when.

More study necessary, D’Ancona! See me after class!

Finally he turns to his heroine: the oleaginous and obnoxious Margaret Hodge and his fear she will probably be unseated at the next general election in Barking.

We can only hope so!

What is apparent to me, is how many people from all social, income and political backgrounds are much tempted by the BNP as a cogent and logical optional choice for their vote: let’s face it, there is little, in truth to chose between Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon mate Twee Georgie Osbourne, the vacuous Nick Clegg and his coterie of Pinko Bleeding Hearts or what now passes as Labour. All of these professional politicians seek self-preference, power and a chance at the financial feeding trough of state.

For the voter and tax payer they have little if any respect: the only persons they do respect are those who throw large amounts of cash their way in return for influence and special interest legislation!

Those vacillating voters need urgently to emerge from the closet, stand up and be counted: if not, then this once proud nation, debt-ridden, collapsed infrastructure and socially, increasingly mired in effective anarchy and chaos, will simply descend finally into the morass of insignificance and become precisely what such as D’Ancona fear: a sort of Third World Fascist Banana Republic, where the rich become ever richer and remote; and the poor and previously middle-class, live cheek-by-jowl in a Devil take the Hindmost sewer.

Charles Hinchliffe

Share