When the British National Party contest an election, it’s not unusual for it to get loads of publicity from the local press in their eagerness to warn about the threat from the “far-right”.

If the mini MSM’ aim is to stop people supporting us, their hysterical rants often have the reverse effect in that, our previously unknown candidates are brought to the attention of local voters.

The latest example of ranting comes from Lincolnshire where the BNP plans to contest two parliamentary seats.

The Lincolnshire Echo in an article reports that an ordained BNP priest is to challenge Gillian Merron to become Lincoln’s next MP.

Rev Robert West, a former district councillor, was named as the BNPs  PPC at a meeting of its North Kesteven branch.

The meeting also saw Scopwick and Kirkby Green parish councillor Mike Clayton presented as a candidate for the Sleaford and North Hykeham seat soon to be vacated by (though not sadly missed) Douglas Hogg.

Rev West said he anticipated support from residents disillusioned by the current state of the country.

“There is so much wrong with Britain,” he said, “and I think Lincoln is right in with the rest of the country in having concerns about family values, the lack of discipline in schools and the massive rise in crime – which is partly to do with immigration, but more a collapse in values in this country. I think the Bishop of Lincoln is a character who needs to be challenged to stand up for Christianity more because he’s not doing enough.”

Ordained into the small Pentacostal sect the Apostolic Church more than 30 years ago, Rev West says he now has little to do with the ministry, but still practises christenings and marriage blessings.

Lincoln is not his first attempt at gaining a parliamentary seat – the Holbeach resident last year received 2.7 percent of the vote in the Norwich North by-election.

“I know I’m not walking distance from the Cathedral, but I’ve visited Lincoln quite frequently as it’s only an hour away – I’m not a foreigner,” he said.

Architect Mr Clayton said he was hopeful of garnering support from locals to go with, what he claimed was, a doubling of party membership in Lincolnshire in recent times.

“And I’ve seen a lot of support in Sleaford and North Hykeham. We are not just a protest vote,” he said.

But the candidacies are viewed with a degree of apprehension by some of the city’s minority groups.

Una Thomas, of the Lincoln Afro Caribbean Society, said she couldn’t understand why a political party like the BNP existed, let alone why they would want to stand in such a diverse county.

“Why do they think they can win?” she said. “With them here, it could bring turmoil. Why can’t they leave us to live in peace?”

Current Lincoln MP Gillian Merron said: “In last year’s local elections, people in Lincoln resoundingly rejected the BNPs policies of hatred and racism – with their candidates coming last in every ward that they stood.”

Nationalists will please note the arrogance from Mrs Thomas, a lady not supposed to be here in the first place.

We can say these words without the fear of  inciting racial hatred, because recently disclosed documents prove that Labour deliberately, and with malice aforethought planned to swamp this country with immigrants, in order to make it a multiracial, and multicultural society all along, for whatever hidden motives they have.

They knew only too well that people in Lincolnshire and the UK would never, ever accept being enriched if the truth were known, so it increased the powers of the EHRC,  to make criticism of Multiculturalism a criminal offense.

This is why the BNP exists, it is the only voice the people have, and the BNP unequivocally rejects the concept of Multiculturalism and diversity. Did we the people choose to be invaded?

Would Mrs Thomas be happy if her country was swamped with non-black immigrants?

The blame for the damage we have suffered must be directed at the ‘musical chair’ party that started the war against the indigenous of our country many years ago, and are intent on destroying all our hard-won freedoms, just to carry out their covert agenda.

They know the BNP are the only party in touch with voters not only on immigration, but on all manner of underhand and traitorous  actions sanctioned by the ‘musical chair’ party, and that is why they will use any and all means necessary to stop us; because we are the only enemy they have.

This is why we know we can win, maybe not this GE, but our time will come.

ps; I just found this in The Hemel Gazette by ‘unknown’, and deservedly the writer should remain unknown.                                                                  ”The by-election has been called following the death of Keith Reid, who died of ill health in December.”                                                       Would he have died if he had been in good health?                                                                                                                                                                             Ahhhh, quality journalism, don’t you just love it?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

A few days ago we reported that local politicians were concerned at the rise of the BNP in Hemel Hempstead.

A by-election is to be held in Adeyfield on the 11th of March, the Hemel Gazette reports that (“useful fools”) UAF activists will to be supported by Liberal Democrat MP Richard Grayson, and he will  encourage people to vote against the “far right”  BNP.

Mr Grayson said: “I was pleased to support Unite Against Fascism’s work in Hemel.

“Members of my family were very active in the campaign against fascism in the 1930s.

“I see the campaign against the BNP as being part of that long campaign to defeat racism in this country, and fascism more widely, and I am proud to take part.”

But the BNP claims that one in three households it has visited in Adeyfield has expressed support for the controversial party.

BNP candidate Janet Price said: “About one in three of the people we have visited have been ‘yes’.

“We’ve been getting a very good response from people as we go round.

“Nobody is rude. I’m quite surprised!”

She said they were using the Electoral roll and not going to homes where the names suggested people from an ethnic minority.

“We have a list of names. We won’t go there to aggravate them. It will only cause rows and we don’t want any upset,” she said.

Concerning the campaigners and the UAF she said: “That is their prerogative. We all have our views. It’s a free country.

“We should be able to have our views without causing any hassle.”

MP Mike Penning said: “The BNP desperately need publicity and I don’t want to give them any. I want them to wither on the vine.”

A Facebook group has been started against the BNP in Dacorum and another anti racist music concert is planned.

Mr Grayson may wish to explain why the Limp- Dhims need the help of  the fascist UAF to stop us.

If he is so sure we are the Devil incarnate, he should tell people about his party policies and why they should vote for the Limp-Dhims.

The fact he needs help from a third party indicates to me that he knows the locals don’t agree with him, or his Limp-Dhim policies.

It is well known that the Limp-Dhims want deeper integration by the EU, more immigration, higher taxes, and also want to reduce the age of consent for sexual intercourse, a way to legalise paedophilia by stealth.

How many prospective Limp-Dhim voters would agree with that?

Not many I suspect.

Luckily the UAF will be out causing trouble and the people will be shown who the real fascists are.

Winston Churchill said; “The next Fascists will be the Anti Fascists.”

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

News Shopper.

http://tinyurl.com/yk7rv3a

Do you suffer from pent up rage, do you find yourself annoyed or angry, are you bad tempered and short with others, do you feel uncomfortable or uneasy when strolling peacefully in London?

You probably live in Lewisham…then again it might be Lambeth, or Enfield.

According to the latest statistics, Lewisham is one of the angriest places in London, it came seventh in a survey carried out by ‘The British  Association of Anger Management’. These results are from a study which took place between January and December 2008. Lambeth was top of the league for anger, followed by Enfield.

Inability to handle anger and outrage are highlighted by ‘BAAM’ .                                                                                                                                                  The ‘BAAM’ director Mr Mike Fisher, “I believe issues such as crime, violence, road rage, addiction, eating disorders, depression and many other mental health issues all stem from our inability as a culture to handle or express our feelings, especially those of anger”                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           1) What does he mean by ‘culture’, does he mean the artificial construct we have been forced to live with for the last 60 years, or does he mean the ‘culture’ that existed before the ‘multicultural’ hell that passes for ‘culture’ ?

2) I do not recall fifty years ago when we had a relatively stable society, many of us having problems with eating disorders, or the violence we experience these days, or depression, or addiction, or the myriad other imported problems that, if we were allowed to express our feelings without fear of recrimination, would be laid firmly at the door of the traitors that have led us by the nose down the ‘Road to Perdition’.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          I am deliberate in my choice of words in the last sentence, the idea that we must refrain from commenting about how we feel is the fuel that feeds the fire of resentment towards our betrayers, and so feeds the fire of Patriotism.

3) What do these Boroughs have in common?                                                                                                                                                                                                     I refer you to the previous paragraphs!!

Share

Last Saturday in Barking we had an interesting guest accompany us on our regular leafleting session. Francesca Paci, an Italian journalist. She had heard of me!!, and she wanted to learn more about the BNP.

Nationalists will notice there are no references to the BNP being a bunch of racist thugs, and she gave a picture of us that no one in the UK would ever, ever  dare print.

Her reference to the ‘working class’ is relevant, because ‘La Stampa’ is read by the many thousands who work directly or indirectly for Fiat, the Italian carmaker.

There is an unusual quote that Britons may not know,  ”The working class goes to heaven”.

This refers to an Elio Petri’ film, “The working class goes to heaven”, the story of a factory worker fighting for better working conditions. It was made in 1972, during a time that workers were striking against their greedy employers and trying to change Italian politics.

The film interestingly, puts the spotlight on the indifference of the politicians to the working class; the supposed “Socialists” who should have been supporting the workers, sound familiar?

Ms Paci is the London correspondent of ‘La Stampa’, a Turin based daily; the translated article follows.

By Francesca Paci.

Peter works for a marketing company, Dave works for a construction company, Rory was a shop assistant but he lost his job a few months ago. At 11am they are all in front of the subway station in Becontree, remote eastern outskirts of London, about forty men and women between 30 and 50 years too late perhaps for the appointment with their life but punctual with the only party they believe will promise them redemption. A quarter of a century ago, probably they would have marched under the banner of socialism. Today, victims of economic and cultural globalization they show proudly the British National Party’ badge, the British far right party that from a modest 6% started to capitalize on the lost illusions of the Blair’ dreams.

“Come on boys, the elections are not won by sitting in the living room.” Slicked-back hair, square-toed shoes, full cream suit without an overcoat, Richard BARNBROOK, representative of the BNP in the London Assembly, braving cold to galvanize the militants with the red nose like the factory’ workers before dismissal typical of the first Ken Loach’ movies. The day is long but so is the list of families to contact door-to door and mark with an X in favor, opposed, uncertain. In Barking, a historic Labor party’ stronghold, the BNP already occupies 12 of the 51 seats: if on May 6 local elections, gained another 14, it would have the majority and control of the area, an historic victory for the pariahs of Westminster.

“So far, the electoral system has kept us away from the parliament but we are gaining supports on the ground where the people are tired of politicians, Europe, third-world immigrants,” says Giuseppe De Santis, 30-years old, from Catanzaro, the only foreigner in the BNP. Bob, a former window-fitter now unemployed is waiting with the engine running in the Ford Mondeo with loads of leaflets against the Labor Party that has changed the demography in Barking in its favour, (it was once 95% British working class), by assigning thousands of council houses to immigrants. Until a few months ago, the party’ constitution excluded non-whites from membership but then, after the intervention of the court, an Asian candidate, Rajinder Singh, applied for membership, a Sikh that will never forgive Muslims for his father’s death during the partition of ‘India in 1947. De Santis is Italian but there is no risk he will be confused with the Africans, the Pakistanis, the Chinese that through the neighborhood look with barely concealed suspicion BNP activists at work and, in doubt, he speaks only English.

“Racist and fascist, are the shame of the country ‘heats Margaret H., 58, a former maths teacher, weeding in the garden of the chalet in Roycraft avenue. “It’s about time somebody said no to multiculturalism that steals our work and roots” says, like two thirds of his fellow British, the 31 year old bricklayer Ralph. A door slammed in my face it’s worth another that opens: Ken, how to repair the roof and shakes hands like Ivan Drago in Rocky IV, the blonde Corry, Tony Mason, earrings and jeans with the hem lengthened given to him by someone taller than him.

“The BNP is not only appeals to unemployed workers but also to the middle class, skilled employees who share the fear of immigration and the disenchantment for the political class” notes Daniele Albertazzi, an expert on the new right of the University of Birmingham. Excluded from the mainstream media, the extreme right has specialized in door to door and online activism: “The first-past the post’ system psychologically discourage voters from voting a party without a chance, but if 2 members can make it to Brussels and others become councilors people will believe that things can change even at national level. ” In 1983, 83% of Britons believed that Tory and Labor were different, now this belief is shared by just one voter in five. If the BNP would get somewhere near the 30% majority it needs it would be enough to bring Nick Griffin in Westminster. Difficult, admits Albertazzi, but not impossible. Peter and the others believe it: if the working class did not go to heaven after all, the fault is not theirs.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

We Nationalists have always known the the UAF thugs are a bunch of idiots, otherwise they wouldn’t came up with a silly story about BNP using foreign models in its leaflets.

This story came up last year during the European elections with the intention of accusing the BNP of double standards as an anti-immigration party using images of non British people in its leaflets.

As all journalists should know the unauthorised use of someone’ picture or photo is illegal and anyone using the image can be sued.

This applies to everyone, not just the BNP, and that is why in the last few years TV programmes use faces that are pixellated to protect the identity of the people being shown.

Do you remember a few years ago a beefeater working in the Tower of London complained because his picture appeared in one of our leaflets.

By using foreign models we can avoid any legal action partly because those people clearly allowed their image to become public domain and so they indirectly authorised anyone to use it, and also because they are foreign they are unlikely to challenge us in any British court.

Even if someone in the UK agrees to appear in one of our leaflets, he/she may change idea and therefore we have to bin all the leaflets containing that picture.

Journalists should know this very well and maybe they do but of course they need to throw everything at us because the date for the local (and maybe general) elections is getting closer, even if this means printing silly stories like this.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

£1026 was raised for the Croydon/Sutton branch’s election campaign at the meeting held in a friendly local pub, chaired by Tony Martin. The audience were treated to a fascinating speech by the fine nationalist orator Jonathan Bowden, followed by a local update by branch organiser Charlotte Lewis. Thanks to Anna Martin [catering], Barry Rogers [security], Peter North and Mark Skinner [driving].

BNP cake

l-r Tony Martin, Jonathan Bowden, Charlotte Lewis

The branch is contesting three parliamentary constituencies and twelve council wards.

Share

Another fat-cat liberal attacks the BNP in the Evening Standard.

Matthew D’Ancona in a long article explains why the BNP has never been more dangerous.

We don’t need the full article it would be pointless, but we will concentrate on some key points that stand alone in exposing the treachery of the ruling elite.

After describing the BNP as a bunch of racist thugs (very quiet about the UAF  hitting the headlines for their violent behaviour) Mr D’Ancona states:

“In an age of globalisation and unprecedented population mobility, any complex urban society will generate such abrasions. And deplorable political movements such as the BNP will always be on hand to fan the flames and exploit the simmering anger.

As I wrote in November, Griffin and his gang are themselves refugees from reality, asylum seekers from the modern world. They choose to ignore the significant role that economic migration played (and will play again) in the years of non-inflationary growth. Worse, they seek to preserve something that never really existed: Britain is the historical product of nations and races coming together and commingling. Historically, this country has been a port rather than a fortress, a place of trade, exchange and racial interaction. Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, Normans, Huguenots, Jews, Afro-Caribbeans, Asians, Eastern Europeans: pluralism is the very essence of our island story. Some of my best friends are Jutes.

At the wonderful Eric Clapton and Jeff Beck concert at the O2 Centre last night, it occurred to me that Britain is the only country on earth that could take a black American musical form — the blues — adapt it to a new setting and, eventually, revive it in its very country of origin (as Clapton and many others did in the Sixties). The BNP has no grasp of the porousness and heterogeneity of true Britishness.” (He would not recognise true”Britishness” if it clocked him one in his smarmy boat)

Leaving aside any discussion about Britishness, any nationalist can see why D’Ancona supports immigration because it means keeping salaries low and working class people poor (the non-inflationary effect).

So does he really think ordinary workers should be grateful to suffer and pay the price of immigration just to allow their employers to get richer and richer?

Far from deterring people from supporting the BNP, statements like that will have the opposite effect.

He gives his thoughts on why the election of Nick Griffin as MP would be a tragedy:

“Yet, more than ever in its 28-year history, the party represents a clear and present danger (to the marxists). A matter of weeks from now, it will field a number of parliamentary candidates in the general election: most dangerously, Griffin himself in Barking. The seat is held by Labour’s Margaret Hodge, defending a majority of almost 9,000.

Safe? By no means. Labour’s own polling shows that the category of voter most easily described as “white van man” is warming alarmingly to the BNP: in seven out of 11 wards, more than 50 per cent of this tranche of voters — more than 70 per cent in some areas — think they might vote for Griffin. Ever willing to nurture the voters’ anxieties and resentments, the BNP has prospered during the recession and exploited the collapse of trust in the political class. In Barking, it sees a real chance to pull off an extraordinary victory.

It is bad enough that the party is represented in town halls and at Strasbourg. But the election of Griffin as an MP would be much, much worse. For the Commons is not just another representative assembly. Never forget: in our unwritten constitution (I think he really believes we do not have a written Constitution), the Queen-in-Parliament is sovereign. I don’t know about you, but the thought of the BNP having a share in that sovereignty, however small, makes me sick to the stomach, and more determined than ever that the battle of Barking should not be lost. In the end, in spite of all its absurdities, the BNP’s advance is no laughing matter.”

Danger to whom?

Maybe for people like D’Ancona but not for us.

It is the ruling elite who make us sick to our stomachs, it is their contempt for ordinary voters, their willingness to impose a multiracial society upon us and the criminalization and bullying of anyone who dares to oppose this plan, that  is unacceptable.

Any member of the BNP has more in common with ordinary voters than people like D’Ancona.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

You know an election is coming when MSM start printing lies about the British National Party.

Below this is an article printed in The Times.

I decided to print it in full because I was present when they came to follow us during our campaign and it’s important to read it so you can understand what kind of rubbish they printed.

“British National Party activists are gathered outside the Underground station, smirking and smoking. A black man spits, twice, at their feet. “Yeah, I know who you are,” he says accusingly.

Does that happen a lot? “What’s that?” asks Richard Barnbrook, a big wheel in the party and an elected member of the Greater London Authority. That man just spat at you. “No! Deliberately?” Yes.

“I didn’t notice,” he mumbles, with a little shake of his head. “We actually get a very positive reaction from many older ethnic minority people here.”

Such a claim can soon be tested. Mr Barnbrook parades along the streets in his “trademark” beige suit which, he thinks, “adds to my charisma — everybody knows who I am”. An Asian woman shudders and moves off the pavement when she sees him approaching. A black father grabs his toddler’s hand and guides her to the other side of the road. A group of teenagers ride by on bikes, yelling obscenities. “Maybe I get a few funny looks, every now and then,” Mr Barnbrook concedes cheerfully.

Welcome to Barking, a suburban town that the BNP wants to make its own, where truth — as well as whole sections of the local population — can be just inconvenient obstacles to be sidestepped or swept away.

The decision by Nick Griffin, the BNP leader, to stand as a parliamentary candidate in Barking has inevitably brought the poison of racial politics ever closer to the surface of an already pockmarked eastern outpost of London.

At the general election in 2005, Mr Barnbrook was only 27 votes away from claiming second place ahead of the Tories. In the following year the BNP grabbed nine of the 30 borough councillor posts in the wards that make up the seat. The party secured an average 41 per cent of the vote in seven contested wards, compared with 33 per cent for Labour.

This is why Mr Griffin abandoned the North West, where he was elected as an MEP last year, and elbowed Mr Barnbrook aside for the chance to stand in Barking. It is where the BNP believes that white working-class alienation can be best exploited to gain a first crucial foothold in Westminster.

Margaret Hodge, the Labour MP for almost 16 years and veteran of many battles in a political career stretching over four decades, recognises that she is in the fight of her life. “We face a real threat from the BNP,” she says. “Griffin is here because he thinks he can win.”

She has, in the past, been criticised for relying too heavily on the black and Asian vote. There have been complaints that she has amplified “BNP propaganda” with efforts to address white voters’ sense of unfairness. Last week she called for immigrants to earn the right to benefits or council housing over several years so that “local people” have higher priority.

Ms Hodge’s campaign has not been helped by an often dysfunctional relationship with Jon Cruddas, the MP for neighbouring Dagenham, who argues that Labour’s appeal should be around shared economic interests, not racial identity. But she has been more visible lately than before, opening a campaign office after the council elections and doubling party membership locally to about 400. Although a number of the party’s older councillors have been purged and are threatening to run as independents, Ms Hodge says Labour has been revitalised. “I’m so proud. We have all had to raise our game.”

Differences within Labour have been put aside because they are far outweighed by the need to “lance the boil” of the BNP. “I am really fearful that if they get a hold here, Barking would become a no-go area for the rest of Britain,” Ms Hodge says. “They bring division and violence.”

There has been talk of Conservative and Liberal Democrat candidates pulling out of the election to present a united front against racism. The consensus among them, however, appears to be that this would merely reinforce Mr Griffin’s claims that the Establishment is ganging up on him.

A greater concern for Labour is the candidacy of the Rev George Hargreaves, leader of the Christian Party, who has strong links to the big Pentecostalist churches proliferating in the area and who may shave away significant numbers of black voters from Labour. “I would much rather he was not standing,” Ms Hodge says.

Barking’s menagerie of candidates will also include Frank Maloney, the former boxing promoter, who is standing for the UK Independence Party. He launched his campaign by challenging Mr Griffin to a fist fight and with a poster that spelt Britain as Britian. The BNP enjoys pointing out that error, but should not laugh too loud. Mr Griffin launched his own campaign for Barking last year in Dagenham, having got confused about the constituency boundaries.

There is much to ridicule about a party that has only recently started wearing suits in an effort to be taken seriously. Council meetings here have descended into farce on occasion. Some BNP councillors — the official opposition — have fallen out among themselves, walked out or been thrown out for misconduct.

On the doorstep Mr Barnbrook mixes talk about wheelie bins with a promise to put immigrant families in tower blocks because, he alleges, they got homes in a Labour plot to flood the constituency with non-whites. Has he got any evidence? “Yes, through our freedom of information requests. But I can’t disclose it at this time because of data protection laws.”

Outside his house, easily recognisable by the St George and Union flags, Mr Barnbrook insists — a little unconvincingly — that he is not bitter about Mr Griffin taking over as parliamentary candidate.

“Only Nick has got an ego big enough to deal with sitting alone in the Commons,” he says. “And, anyway, to control the council would be far more prestigious. I’m better with people, I have more charisma.” So how does he get on with his neighbours? “Great,” he replies. “We have black and Muslim families living here. I get on with everybody.”

A few inquiries at homes nearby suggests that this is not quite true. One black man says that he feels uneasy leaving his young family on their own because “a lot of people come to that house, I don’t like the way they look at my children”. A few doors down, a woman says: “I’m scared of them. Please don’t print my name.”

Mr Barnbrook may try to be nice. He clearly believes in the powers of all that charisma and his special suit. The BNP is ridiculous — even pathetic. But when fomenting such fear and loathing, it is not funny.”

For a start I don’t remember anyone spitting at Mr Barnbrook or shaking in fear when they saw us but, as we all know, Rupert Murdoch’ papers are as reliable as the promise of a prostitute to give sex for free.

However the biggest distortion is that they didn’t mention me.

Fiona Hamilton talked to me I told her who I am, what my position in the party is, and why I joined; one of them took several pictures of me handing BNP leaflets.

Clearly they understood that any mention of me would undermine the claim that the BNP as a “racist” party wouldn’t allow an Italian to become an officer.

The whole article is completely biased but as we all know newspapers lies are worth less than the recycled paper  they are printed on.

The only bit of good news is that Margaret Hodge is paying the price for her own misjudgement.

She has allowed her constituency to become swamped with Africans but they clearly prefer to support a black candidate.

We all know people tend to vote along ethnic lines but not a marxist like Mrs Hodge.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The British National Party has a very good chance of gaining control of Barking & Dagenham’ council and might get its first MP, so it was inevitable that the journalists and media workers would launch a campaign now called EXPOSE aimed at “revealing the undemocratic and racist nature” of the British National Party.

The new campaign will tackle the BNP’s “attempts to construct a respectable public image” and support media workers who refuse to work on uncritical programmes or material (how facist is that?), the group announced today.

EXPOSE aims to brief reporters and news editors to help them challenge the BNP’s statements and spokespersons in the run-up to the UK election, the campaigners said.

A launch rally at the Amnesty UK headquarters in London on 23 February will feature Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, columnist and broadcaster; Mehdi Hasan, political senior editor for the New Statesman; Sunny Hundal, editor of the Liberal Conspiracy blog; and Peter (Tango) Hain, secretary of state for Wales.

“The political and media consensus appears to be that the way to tackle the BNP is to meet it halfway, by talking up tough anti-immigration measures. This conventional wisdom must urgently be challenged,” said one its founding supporters, James Macintyre, political correspondent for the New Statesman.

“The BNP is not an ‘ordinary’ political party. So why does the media, including the BBC, give them so much time, space and opportunity to spread their bile?” added his New Statesman colleague Mehdi Hasan.

The campaign is also backed by the unions, speakers at the event will include Michelle Stanistreet, deputy general secretary of the National Union of Journalists; Pat Styles, national official for BECTU, the media and entertainment union, and Weyman Bennett joint secretary of Unite Against Fascism.

“Journalists have a duty to hold up to the closest scrutiny the claims and activities of those who would foment racial tension and violence. The BNP’s inflammatory rhetoric about immigration cannot be taken at face value,” said Stanistreet.

The above statement will infuriate nationalists but the good news is that the campaign will achieve nothing.

You will remember how last year, during the European campaign, a massive and unprecedented smear campaign against the BNP waged by mainstream media (MSM) at the beck and call of the Fabianites did not prevent us getting 2 MEPs and 3 county councillors elected, so whatever plans they have, they cannot stop us now.

What do parasites like Peter Hain and the scum of the earth UAF’ thugs he supports fail to understand?

They do not understand that the BNP is gaining more support in spite of the hostility from the MSM; because we are the only party in touch with “The Common Man”.

In Barking & Dagenham we are the only party with activists on the ground leafleting, canvassing, holding paper sales and collecting petitions against knife crime, as is evident to anyone living there.

It’s hard to recall the last time activists from the Labour party did the same, actually they don’t go out because they are demoralised and scared, so they prefer to use antifascists to deliver smear leaflets.

They may convince a few to deny us their support, but they do nothing to persuade them to vote NuLabour, and the fact a political party needs to smear its opponents proves that NuLabour is a dead man walking and has nothing positive to offer.

Look at NuLabour, and see what they have done to the white working class in Barking & Dagenham and elsewhere in the UK.

The BNP know that millions of our people are being sacrificed on the altar of mass immigration, and those millions know that negative articles about the BNP in the MSM are just the modern equivalent of a Hans Christian Anderson fairy story.http://www.populationmedia.org/what/sabido-method/

That is why most anti-BNP campaigners (except the truly lost ones) know that describing the BNP as fascist is pointless and a different approach is needed.

Also, what they can disclose about us that people don’t know already?

No one takes any notice if someone describes us as racist and fascist, they have done it so many times we are now immune to such accusations.

These kind of accusations may work on brainwashed students with no real life experience, or residents of posh suburbs who only gain by swamping this country with immigrants, but they will not convince the working class people to support again a party that has betrayed them.

That is why the BNP is gaining support even with the establishment united against us, because we are not scared of the truth and we have nothing to hide.

And as for the journalists, they know we are getting our message across via the internet, and more and more people are refusing to buy newspapers and choose to read the blogs and websites to be informed.

The “dead tree press” need stories that help to sell papers and that is why they talk tough on immigration, but belittle and demonise the only party that tells the truth about the crisis. Their readers support the BNP line and as a result most newspaper groups are in dire financial straits.

They know what is happening, and that is why some MPs with narrow majorities (Margaret Hodge) and ministers are attempting to reconnect with the electorate.

As for the UAF, they do more to boost the BNP with their thuggish behaviour than any positive campaign, and they show themselves to be the real fascists they are.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Churchill said.”The New Facists will be the AntiFacists”. (para)

Share

The chairman opened the meeting stating that these were exciting times for our Party. Never before did the BNP have such potential in the parliamentary and local elections!

Nearly sixty people were in for a display of fine speeches. The legendary veteran Richard Edmonds, the main speaker of the meeting, bestowed on the gathering a beautiful, passionate and emotional rendition of the past and a reality check on what might be the future. He made it clear that our Party was the only hope for our People and we as a movement had to do our utmost to seize this opportunity. It was a pulsating speech of sheer enthusiasm.

Michael Barnbrook, The BNP Sleazebuster and parliamentary candidate for Dagenham and Rainham told the audience that he was going to make them angry and by doing so the good people in the room would donate to the election fund! The former Police Inspector focused on the corruption in the House of Commons and in the GLA. Michael’s plan worked too, as the meeting raised a record branch total of £2400!

After the break two fine, competent Ladies of the British National Party addressed the meeting. First up was the Eltham Parliamentry Candidate Roberta Woods. She stated: “I never expected in my wildest dreams to be a candidate for this Party: however this would be the fourth occasion I am standing.” Roberta made a plea for people to stand in the local elections even if they were only to be as paper candidates and she finished by saying “think what a legacy you would leave for your children if you were to stand as a candidate for this party: you’d be trying to help save your Nation from oblivion”! Roberta’s speech had a profound effect on a number of people who stepped forward to volunteer as candidates after the meeting.

Our last speaker was the very determined and sharp Tess Culnane. She was so passionate and a fine example of the quality of the array of Parliamentary Candidates on show. Tess is standing in Orpington. She made it clear, “I have never been frightened of being a candidate or a member of the British National Party: And why should we be?” Tess explained her role on the GLA. She was investigating slum landlords who converted houses into tiny bedsits and charged a fortune for rent. She also said that “it was a disgrace that part of The Royal Greenwich Park would close due to the Olympics. Tess also asked if anyone had any issues to bring them to her attention and she would do her utmost to investigate them.

The Chairman thanked everyone for their support and closed the meeting.

Share

The New shopper phoned me today and I gave an interview over the phone. The interviewer Mark Chandler was very challenging but obviously this is a big story. London BNP want to stand in all 3 Mayoral elections, Newham, Hackney and Lewsiham. You would think the miserable toe rags in the Lib/Lab/Con parties would welcome a challenge and an increase in choice for the citizens of these three boroughs. No, they cry foul like the undemocratic pigs in troughs they are. Anyway read the full article here

Share

From our friends at Wigan Patriot:

Nick Griffin’s decision to stand against Margaret Hodge really seems to have ruffled her feathers.
She is now to some degree copying BNP policies which she has up to now deemed racist, and recognising the resentment of voters in the unfettered immigration policies of her government and their treatment of British people as seciond class citizens.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248364/Margaret-Hodge-says-migrants-EARN-benefits-takes-BNP.html

She says it is time “to lance the boil” of growing discontent over the wave of economic migrants entering our country.
No Margaret it is time to “lance the boil” of New Labour your corrupt party which has presided over the most disastrous demographic changes in 10,000 years of British history for purely party reasons, not to mention bankrupting the country while borrowing £billions to give away in foreign aid and the EU.

If you did not see this self inflicted disaster you should have, or were you shielded from people’s views by your draconian PC speech laws which prevented people from speaking out for fear of being criminalised for being “racist”?
To paraphrase Nick Griffin “you can prevent us from speaking out but you can not control the way we think”
Your “vibrant, diverse multicultural society” is turning to bite you on your fat bottom which has been thus far shielded from reality by your champagne socialist lifestyle paid for by us.

You had no mandate to impose these changes on us and have sought to silence us by dubious legal practices and depriving us of our historical right to free speech.
Now you and your slimy party will reap the whirlwind and slither into oblivion.
It seems however you may just survive as the Tories have offered you a lifeline (how ironic a loony lefty like you being offered help by the Tories) It just shows how alike, treacherous and anti British both your parties are.

After the next election and the Tories get in they will be no better as their policies are identical to yours and our support will grow as a result.
The following election will be our BIG breakthrough when we will be able to begin the task of rebuilding our country culturally and financially.

The danger is that civil unrest will lead to conflict between the multiple groups and allegiances you have encouraged here, as you can’t have a united and a diverse country at the same time. They are incompatible at opposite ends of the spectrum.

Let’s hope the people have enough patience to go through the coming hard times until a party,the BNP which has the interests of the British people as a priority comes to power.

In the meantime, even without MPs we are having an influence on government thinking even if it is only an attempt to save their subsidised skins.

A BNP vote is thus proved again to be worth more than a vote for any other party as it really makes them sit up even if we do not get in.

Share

The British National Party has always said, there is no difference between the three main parties and that David Cameron could well lead the NuLabour party because there is no difference between him and Gordon Brown.

It is no surprise therefore to hear that a Labour-Tory pact to keep BNP leader Nick Griffin out of Parliament was mooted by David Cameron.

According to the Evening Standard, the Conservatives considered a radical plan to help arts minister Margaret Hodge fend of the challenge from Mr Griffin in Barking.

Under the proposal, the Tories would have agreed not to put a candidate up against Mrs Hodge in the hope of giving her a better chance of defeating the “far-Right” party leader at the general election.

But the plan was killed off after anti-fascist group Searchlight said that the pact could backfire by fuelling Mr Griffin’s “victim status”.

Why is Mr Cameron so keen to support Margaret Hodge?

Maybe it is because he fears Mr Griffin will uncover some dirty secrets and expose treachery in high places?

Or maybe because in an hung parliament Mr Griffin might have the balance of power?

We would like to know; but at least the fact such a plan was considered means we have a good chance of winning a seat in Parliament.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Greenwich British National Party.

2010 Election Launch.

Special Speakers!

RICHARD EDMONDS. [Former Deputy Leader and Founder Member.].

MICHAEL BARNBROOK. [ The BNP'S Sleezbuster and Parliamentary Candidate for Dagenham and Rainham.]

Start Time: 7.30pm. This Thursday the 4Th of February at our usual venue or meet at Mottingham BR Station from 7.15pm to be met and taken to venue. This will be a great night! All Welcome. Arrive early to secure a seat! Extra Info call John 07833 257 228.

Share

Come and enjoy an evening celebration of our patron Saint St George in the City of London, Friday 23rd April 2010 from 7pm to Midnight:

THIS WILL BE A TICKET ONLY EVENT ON A FIRST COME FIRST SERVE BASIS WITH 80 TICKETS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE, NO TICKETS WILL BE SOLD ON THE NIGHT.

THIS EVENT IS SUBJECT TO A STRICT DRESS CODE FOR MEN OF JACKET AND TIE, DENIM IS NOT PERMITTED. THE DRESS CODE WILL BE ENFORCED WITH NO EXCEPTIONS.

TO ENCOURAGE COUPLES (man and wife or boyfriend and girlfriend) TICKETS ARE PRICED AS £15 FOR A SINGLE TICKET AND £22.50 FOR A COUPLES TICKET.

THERE WILL BE FOOD, MUSIC AND A RAFFLE DRAWN BY OUR VERY SPECIAL GUEST.

AN EVENT NOT TO BE MISSED, FOR TICKETS PHONE CHRIS ROBERTS ON 07976974952 OR WRITE TO PO BOX 61680 Eltham.

PLEASE MAKE CHEQUES PAYABLE TO BRITISH HERITAGE AND POST TO THE ABOVE PO BOX, STATING YOUR NAME, THE NAME OF YOUR GUEST (if applicable) THE NAME OF YOUR BNP GROUP OR BRANCH AND A CONTACT PHONE NUMBER YOU CAN BE REACHED ON.

LETS MAKE THIS A ST GEORGE CELEBRATION TO REMEMBER!

Share

Fighting elections is an expensive business, and as you know the BNP does not enjoy the kind of financial assistance that the old gang parties take for granted. We truly are a grass roots organisation. If you can spare something, even if it’s just a couple of quid, then please do help us. Make cheques payable to British National Party, write ‘London’ on the back, and send to PO box 2755, Thornton Heath, Surrey, CR7 9BD.

Thank you.

Charlotte Lewis – London regional fund-holder

Share

London BNP got off to a flying start for 2010 with a weekend of Action in Barking and Dagenham on 2/3rd Jan. Across London candidate recruitment and leafleting teams are out most days as a General Election could be called at anytime. We still need lots more candidates for the general and local elections and your Branch needs help leafleting. Please give some more time to helping out if you can.

The first National Days of Action (16/17 Jan) for what’s been called the ‘Battle of Barking’ brought together 70 members and activists from all over the country. London BNP especially wants to thank the activists who travelled down from Scotland to help out. In the space of the weekend about 30,000 of the excellent Voice of Barking and Dagenham leaflets were delivered to the residents of the borough. A copy of the leaflet is enclosed as an attachment. Feedback from the leaflet has been excellent and it seems it has thrown Labour into a blind panic. The next National Days of Action in B&D are on the 12,13,14th of Feb however we hope to see you in B&D before then as we are campaigning every weekend .

London BNP Officers Meeting

A London BNP Officers meeting was held on the evening of the 16th Jan. The importance of Recruiting candidates for the Local and General Elections was discussed along with the strategy of standing a candidate in every ward where possible. London BNP hopes to stand at least 20 Candidates at the General Election. The National Organiser Eddy Butler gave a talk on fund raising and a lively discussion followed with many ideas exchanged. It was decided sometime ago that Constituency Candidates will be encouraged to put up their own deposit of £500 and possibly paying for their own campaign literature. Branches will help out financially where possible.  The cost of final leaflet to be delivered by the Post Office will be A4 £1500 A5 £800.  If you can help your branch with a donation please get in touch with your local organiser or otherwise send a cheque payable to ‘BNP’ or ‘British Heritage’ and send it to Cllr Bailey, 34 sylvan Ave, Chadwell heath, Essex, RM6 6BE. Those cheques received by the London Organiser will be paid into a specific London BNP General Election Account. Cllr Richard Barnbrook gave a short talk on the days events and stressed the importance of helping out in Barking and Dagenham if we are to get the Party Chairman elected to Westminster. To close the meeting the Party Chairman gave a uplifting talk on the progress made by the party and how we are shaping political discussion in Britain.

National Organisers Meeting

On Sunday the 24th Jan there was a National Organisers meeting in Bedfordshire. There were about 20 delegates from London in attendance.

EGM/Constitutional Changes

The date for the party EGM to discuss the constitutional changes will now take place on Sunday 14th of Feb. All voting members can attend.  More details to follow.

The Voting Members of the Party voted overwhelmingly at this years’ Annual Conference in Leigh in Lancashire to endorse the leadership’s plans for constitutional change in the face of the legal manoeuvres by the Equalities Commission and due to the pending Equalities Act. This will make it illegal for any registered political party to discriminate in its membership policy on the grounds of race. When the new plans for constitutional change have been finally drafted the proposed new Constitution will be sent to all members in early January. The entire membership will be given the opportunity to vote in person on whether or not to accept the new Constitution at an Extraordinary General Meeting which is scheduled to take place on the weekend of 30th and 31st January. In essence the plans for constitutional change are that the status of Voting Members will be enhanced so that the power to vote for the Chairman or for future constitutional changes will be vested with this group. There will be other measures designed to protect the Party from being taken over by elements hostile to our aims and policies and to ensure that we can meet and socialise in a harmonious atmosphere. Members should be assured that irrespective of who may be able to join our Party in the future, the aims, policies, ideology and political objectives will remain the same. Whoever joins our Party will be expected to support and campaign for these objectives.

Why Not Become A Councillor

A councillor……..Who me?

*             Are you interested in helping your local community?

*             Do you ever wish you could influence the way things are done in your area?

*             Do you have the skills to listen, debate and make a sound decision?

*             Have you got the confidence to stand up and speak in public?

*             Are you prepared to extend your skills and knowledge?

*             Could you devote time to your community?

If you answered yes to these questions then why not become a councillor?

You do not need any formal qualifications to become a councillor.

How much do I need to know?

You do not need any previous experience, but an understanding of how a Council works would be helpful. The key qualities required are a willingness to learn and an interest in developing yourself as a community leader within your electoral division. If you are elected you would be offered training to help you carry out your duties and support from both the Council and from the existing nationwide BNP Councillor groups.

Councils tend to place a great emphasis on training/development and expect councillors to actively participate in appropriate opportunities, which can help develop the skills and abilities necessary to remain an effective councillor.

What is the time commitment?

This will depend on your roles and responsibilities. The work of a councillor can vary from a few hours each week to several hours each day according to the commitments you take on. In addition to your work in the community, there will be Council/Committee meetings and local area meetings and meetings of residents associations. For most of the meetings you attend there will be associated papers and documents which you will need to read beforehand.

Do councillors get paid?

Parish and Town councillors do not get paid. As a rule of thumb District councillors usually get about £3,000 to £4,000 a year, while County Councillors, councillors for Unitary authorities, Metropolitan and London Borough s get from about £9,000 to £14,000. Why not discuss the matter further with your Organiser.

See you on the Campaign Trail

Remember all the success we have had so far comes from you and our future success depends on YOU. As London organiser I want to personally thank you for all your efforts so far and I look forward to seeing you on the Campaign trail in the future.

Cllr Robert Bailey

London Organiser

london@bnp.org.uk

Share

A weekend of action is planned covering Saturday 23rd and Sunday 24th January in barking an Dagenham.

This weekends action follows a very successful National Weekend of Action where we had about 70 activists helping out in Barking and Dagenham in support of the campaign to get the Party Chairman Nick Griffin MEP elected to Westminster for the Barking constituency and to help the British National Party take control of Barking and Daghenham Council under the local leadership of Richard Barnbrook. There will be leafleting and canvassing.

Meet at Dagenham Heathway Underground Station (District Line), at 11 am on both days. If you are likely to be delayed then please call Richard on 07869243129 or Lawrence on 07952291631.

Share