Most violent crimes against native Britons are committed by foreign scum who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place.
The latest example is that of a Romanian rapist jailed for at least 11 years after leaving his homeland to prey on British victims.
Two women in their 20s feared they would die at the hands of Gheorghe Avadani 32
, after he held them prisoner, throttled them and tried to gouge out one of his victim’s eyeballs.
The scarred and tattooed criminal was freed from a Romanian jail in mid 2007 after serving a three-year sentence for raping a teenager.

Avadani came to Britain in July 2008 and struck twice within a matter of months after preying on sex workers.
His second victim told jurors how Avadani attacked her in February last year.
‘He tried to suffocate me,’ she said.
‘He put two fingers into my eyes and was trying to take out my eyeball.
‘I pretended I was dead and that he’d killed me.’

Avadani denied any wrongdoing, claiming either that the sex was consensual or he was the victim of mistaken identity, but was convicted following a trial.
Judge Simon Davis handed him an indeterminate sentence for public protection, with a minimum of 11 years before he can be considered for parole.
He is likely to spend the rest of his life on licence and be deported after his release.
The judge said: ‘In my view, you demonstrate a pattern of escalating gravity in your offending.
‘I am of the opinion that there is a significant risk to members of the public of serious harm occasioned by you by the commission of further specified offences.
‘You are a danger to women. You targeted vulnerable victims.
‘There was an element of planning in that you were familiar with the two locations and were confident that suitable victims could be found there.
‘There was more than one victim – there were multiple rapes.’
The first UK victim’s ordeal came to light when she confided in a community nurse.
She later told a police officer how Avadani approached her on Green Street, Upton Park, East London in late September or early October 2008 and agreed to pay her ‘£30 for 10 minutes’.
When they got to his home in nearby Selsdon Road, his manner changed but when she asked to leave he stopped her.
The woman said she sobbed as he stripped her and she added: ‘When I screamed he put his hand over my mouth and told me to shush.
‘That’s when he strangled me. I thought I was going to die. I couldn’t breathe.
‘I said: ‘If I promise to do what you say, will you let me go?’
‘He said: “Yes”.’
She said she begged him to wear a condom but he ignored her.
Afterwards he held her ‘really tight’ until she fell asleep before ordering her to leave in the morning.
Then on February 21 last year, his next victim banged on the window of a friend’s home, naked from the waist down.
She was taken to hospital and gave police an account she had been raped earlier that day.
The woman said she was walking home from Seven Sisters tube in north London when the Romanian grabbed her waist and offered her money for sex.
She took him to her nearby home but once there he ordered her to ‘get on with the job’ and she changed her mind.
He blocked her path to the door with a sofa and turned off the light.
Avadani ripped off her clothes, punched her about the head, and rammed her head into the wall and floor, and pushed his fingers into her eyes before raping her.
Afterwards he let her go to the toilet but she took the opportunity to escaped, semi-naked, through a window and raised the alarm.

The judge said the woman was ‘alone, lonely and very, very vulnerable’.

A DNA sample taken from her matched Avadani and he was arrested a week later.
He claimed the pair had consensual sex but explained the strange positioning of the sofa near the door as her bid to keep him in her flat.
The Romanian, who has been self-harming since the age of 11, is ‘not quite the ticket’ according to his barrister Jenny Hart.
She said Avadani, who continues to deny any wrongdoing, had found his time in the UK ‘sobering’.
Avadani denied four counts of vaginal rape, false imprisonment, two of assault by penetration and assault occasioning actual bodily harm but was convicted by a jury.
He further denied one count of oral rape and was cleared.

How many violent crimes are commited by first and second generation immigrants?
What make those crimes indefensible is the fact that it is so easy to prevent them, all we need do is to stop immigration and kick out of the country all the foreigners that have been convicted of a crime.
The marxists who run the MSM and the Labour councillors in Barking & Dagenham constantly accuse us of inciting racial hatred and causing division between communities for stating something that most people would see as common sense.
The truth is that when Labour conspired to swamp Britain with immigrants in order to make it multicultural they were well aware that immigration would bring an increase in crime, and recently disclosed documents confirm that Labour ministers deliberately omitted any reference to crime when they made the case for more immigration.

It may take time, but rest assured when we gain power we will ensure that all the elected politicians responsible for this mess are put on trial for treason.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Black Country Patriot BC1959

As memories of the Blair Project seem to flutter away in the breeze for most people, moments of anger and disappointment that flecked his ugly disgraceful premiership are once again part of our every day lives, why? Because the politically engineered Con-Dem (Brokeback) Coalition, arranged so subtly with help from the controlled media before the elections last May, has made even the most apolitical Briton somewhat concerned about the blue print for white British ethnic cleansing just as obvious this time as the last.

Once the British National Party has gone through it’s latest stage of development, leading to a certain maturity after obviously state sponsored attacks from within, and some folk being taken in by some of the oldest tricks in the Communist Political Subversion Handbook, we will literally be the only opposition party left in British politics, and they know it.

So then, Cameron, backed by his genetically modified Liberal partners, and the Biggest Trade Delegation in history, (TV media spin), have been doing deals behind the backs of not only his own traditional Conservative supporters, but the whole of the next generation of British school leavers, including Post Graduates, who are now working behind bars, stacking shelves, or living off friends and relatives whilst facing massive debts. The reality of all this of course is the fact, openly stated by the media that the Indian government has put pressure on Britain to be more flexible in it’s immigration policies.

By flexible, they mean an open door policy. Not only that but with Turkey now being encouraged to enter the near bankrupt Euro-Zone, we will see some 750,000 extra immigrants at least, from that country alone. With some 5000,000. illegals here already, and another 10,000,000 settled here in the last fifty years or so, the true number of non-white British Citizens, could actually be a frightening One Third of the population of the estimated 75,000,000 future populace, considering their phenomenally high birth rates.
Here’s what Migration Watch has to say: There was relatively little migration into Britain (other than from Ireland) until New Commonwealth immigration began in the 1950s. Legislation in the early 1970s was intended to reduce this to a trickle. In practice it continued at the rate of half a million acceptances for settlement every decade. This was counterbalanced by emigration until 1983. The net inflow has grown steadily since then. The total net immigration from outside the E.U. has now reached a rate equivalent to about 1.5 million every decade.

With recent revelations about New Labour’s ”Brave New Britain” coming to light, where even the media proved its limited national worth, and exposed papers suggesting that the Blair project had used immigration to smash the right in Britain, and change the country for ever, it was hoped that Cameron would at least honour some Conservative policies. In April this year, one month before the elections, Cameron told the Mail: Immigration is ‘too high’ and will be reduced to levels last seen in the mid-1990s under a Tory election blueprint to restore Britain’s ‘sense of national purpose. Reducing levels to those of the 1990s would mean around 50,000 immigrants a year would be allowed to settle.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxxU9XaX

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxrOx69d

Please remember that the figures here are simply block numbers, referenced from media and other sources, to show some reality of the then, now, and future outlook for Britain. Immigrants are well known for their love of the ‘Benefits Riviera Of The World’, ie Britain, and thus, any numbers suggested could explode beyond those shown here. Simply put, we are in for a very serious economic, social, and lawless five years. God help the children.

Now Mr Cameron, are you going to take your name off the UAF supporter list? Is Blair, Brown, and in fact anyone in politics still alive when they introduced Globalism into our nation in 1948, going to take responsibility for not only what has already happened to us, but what is happening, and the BLOODY consequences that will without a shadow of a doubt, come to fruition?

All Prime Ministers and every member of this, and all previous governments, their financial contributors, horse whispering foreign advisers, and the increasingly arrogant and aggressive immigrants given opportunities our grand parents could not have imagined, will have to face the wrath of the descendants of the Ancient Briton. This is not a vague threat, or a piece written in righteous anger. It is quite simply, A Promise To Pay The Bearer so to speak. Ironically, that was what we were, as a nation, promised in 1833, when bank notes were made legal tender for all sums above £5 in England and Wales. Thus, in the event of a crisis, the British people would still be able to accept such Bank notes, and its bullion reserves would be safeguarded.

Where are our reserves Mr Cameron? Where is our national, and socio-economic security? Can you tell us Mr Cameron, why you and your shadowy masters and advisers, have now decided to completely destroy this nation? Most people think the answer is obvious… you dare not, and you could not. You have gone abroad, and blatantly reneged on every promise you made, and helped push the Blair Project further. You are a parasite, a traitor, and an enemy of the people Mr Cameron. You are in fact, the absolute proof that in this, and other Western European nations, that we are at the mercy of a multi-headed Marxist Occupied Government (MOG), in the worst economic crisis to hit the world in Eighty Years, yet you are now going to import millions more immigrants into our nation yet again, under the illusion of economic necessity. You are going to enslave us to low wages, and at the same time help the Blair Project along nicely, by robbing our manufacturing and skills base and taking our inheritance from us without a sleepless night.

Readers, imagine this continuating if you will. Think hard and long about your own circumstances. If we have five full years of this coalition, and yet another rump of immigrants arrive on our shores, what will this government do to placate them, and to halt opposition to such ethnic cleansing? That’s right, they will outlaw ALL opposition, and extend the powers of the alien lawmakers that have infested our legal institutions. Add to this the much vaunted benefit system overhaul, which will be used to take more away from our own, and give extra help, homes, jobs and businesses, such as the much needed car washing franchises seen by the thousand around this country of ours. Skilled jobs are already taken by immigrants as it is, so why is it that India, China, and Pakistan amongst others, are so willing to let go of their own skilled workers, nurses, and car wash experts?

Traitor and political rent boy, Tony Blair, who now ponces around the globe making millions and pretending to care about the third world, did not leave the once much loved, and most famous address in history No 10 Downing Street. He simply underwent genetic modification by his political surgeons, changed his name, and we now have a new face for the Blair Project. Do you recognise him Dave? It’s you, yes you. We will remember you, and every single one of the traitors, war-mongers, bullion thieves, and those responsible for aiding and abetting the rape, murder, and ethnic cleansing of our last two generations of white British people. When the men in suits come knocking on our doors Mr Cameron, that is when the real revolution will begin… the Nationalist Revolution.

By BC1959

Share this post:

Hide Sites

CNN Europe

The truth is out!!
The pretend idiot David Cameron is hell bent on achieving his (and his cronies) aim of hammering home the last nails into the coffin of the European Nation States by his assertion that Turkey should be allowed to flood Europe with 50+ million muslims, he has sided with those that have nothing but hatred for the democratic process.
He blames the Jews for the state that Gaza is in, and panders to the largest threat to Christianity we have seen since Vienna defied Islam.

“Let me also be clear that the situation in Gaza has to change. Humanitarian goods and people must flow in both directions. Gaza cannot and must not be allowed to remain a prison camp,” Cameron said, according to a transcript of the speech provided by his office.
Residents of Gaza say they have suffered greatly under an Israeli goods blockade implemented since Hamas took control of the territory after elections in 2006. But Israel says its tough measures are necessary to stop weapons from reaching Hamas militants intent on destroying Israel.

Cameron made the remarks in the Turkish capital of Ankara, which he was visiting to forge a new relationship with Turkey and show his support for Turkish membership in the European Union.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

DEMOS. People Flow means Prosperity for Europe

Indigenous Defence Force

IDF Thursday, 22 April 2010
Anthony Brown

The People Flow authors make a mistake common among pro-immigration advocates: seeing a nation as nothing more than a geographical entity with a functioning economy and a legal system. But a nation is first and foremost its people. It is the French people that define what France is, not lines on a map.

The pro-immigrationists are effectively trying to abolish nationhood, denying a country the right to sustain its own culture.

British-born white people, the progeny of the generation who survived the Nazi attempt to obliterate Britain as an independent nation state, now account for only 60% of the population of London. England has for more than 1500 years been a Christian country – its flag is a cross, its head of state is head of the national church – but in its second city Birmingham, Islam is now more worshipped than Christianity. In two boroughs of London, whites are already in the minority, and they are expected to become a minority in several cities in the coming decade.

If current trends continue, the historically indigenous population of Britain will become a minority by around 2100. Islam is the fastest growing religion, and much immigration to Britain comes from Muslims fleeing Muslim lands – around 75% of intercontinental asylum seekers are Muslim. But where are the limits? In an extreme example, would British Christians have a right not to live in an Islamic majority state?

For an answer to this, consider what that most liberal of American writers, Gore Vidal, said in a lecture in Dublin in 1999:

“A characteristic of our present chaos is the dramatic migration of tribes. They are on the move from east to west, from south to north. Liberal tradition requires that borders must always be open to those in search of safety or even the pursuit of happiness. But now with so many millions of people on the move, even the great-hearted are becoming edgy. Norway is large enough and empty enough to take in 40 to 50 million homeless Bengalis. If the Norwegians say that, all in all, they would rather not take them in, is this to be considered racism? I think not. It is simply self-preservation, the first law of species.”

But at what point are people of the west allowed to say that enough is enough, it is time for us to be allowed to preserve our culture? This is an issue of almost total, mind-numbing hypocrisy among western governments and political elites. They defend the inalienable right of other peoples – the Palestinians, Tibetans, native Americans – to defend their culture, but not the right of their own peoples.

It is vital to emphasise that mass immigration and the remarkably intolerant ideology of multiculturalism are exclusively western phenomena. Indeed, the striking thing about the global immigration debate in the west is its determined parochialism. If people in India, China, or Africa were asked whether they have a right to oppose mass immigration on such a scale that it would transform their culture, the answer would be clear. Yet uniquely among the 6 billion people on the planet, westerners – the approximately 800 million in western Europe, North America and Australasia – are expected by the proponents of mass immigration and multiculturalism to abandon any right to define or shape their own society.

This liberal hypocrisy was perfectly illustrated in 2002, when the British government gave full UK passports to 200,000 people living in British overseas territories, such as St. Helena, Montserrat and the Turks & Caicos islands. The inhabitants were allowed to live in Britain, but there was no reciprocal right for British people to live there.

The justification for this one-sidedness was given in the House of Lords by the foreign office minister Valerie Amos:

“The right of abode is non-reciprocal. The territories which fall within the scope of the Bill are for the most part small islands. In consultations on the content of the Bill the governments of the territories concerned made clear that granting British and European citizens the right of abode in their territories would risk fundamentally altering the social, cultural and economic fabric of the territories.”

Britain too is a small island, yet other British government ministers tell the British people that they must embrace mass immigration, and that it is simply racist for British people to oppose the altering of their country’s social, cultural and economic fabric. What makes the Caribbean and South Atlantic islanders noble in defending their culture, and the British racist in defending theirs? It is largely about being a minority, and being outnumbered. But western people are a global minority. There are more citizens of either India and China than all the people of Europe, North America and Australasia put together. There are as many people in Bangladesh and Pakistan together as in the US.

In the developing world, there are simply no significant equivalents of Europe and the US, where around 10% of people are foreign born, or Canada and Australia where the proportion is around 25%. The foreign born in the developing world rarely exceed 1% of the population.

Indeed, developing countries have been the most draconian in clamping down on immigration. In 2002, Malaysia started forcibly returning some of the thousands of illegal immigrants from Indonesia, while India put soldiers on its borders with Bangladesh to force illegal Bangladeshi immigrants back home. Western countries do not cane illegal immigrants or point a gun at them, but provide them with free immigration lawyers, free shelter, free food, free schooling and free healthcare – then express disappointment when they are reluctant to leave.

Several countries outside the developed west actively discriminate in favour of their own nationals. Saudi Arabia has adopted an official policy of “Arabisation” of many commercial sectors; Nigeria pursues “indigenisation” of its engineering industry, and Zimbabwe’s agricultural policy has similar motivations. In 2002, India began issuing residency cards to the 20 million “people of Indian origin” currently living in the west, specifically writing the legislation to exclude any white people born in India. Meanwhile, the South Korean government insists it is not a nation of immigrants, but an ethnic group with shared history and culture, while Japan has no desire to dilute its unique identity by opening the floodgates of mass immigration.

- Anthony Brown

Share this post:

Hide Sites

South Wales BNP
The Green Arrow

I do not apologise for lifting this complete from GA. It says more than the MSM does about the dire state we find ourselves in today. And by the way, dont think that these people are a minority amongst Muslims, they are just the empty drum that makes the most noise. The Islamic cult is hell bent on removing all us Kuffars from the face of the earth. Google ‘Kitman’ and ‘Taqyyia’ what you find will open your eyes to the truth.

I urge you to watch the video in high definition and please, please, please listen carefully to the words spoken by the colonisers from the Cult of the Dead Paedophile.

The police stood by and allowed these people to spout their hatred towards the British People and non moslems.

I can now tell you that in a conversation with a senior police officer who was present, that the police were there, not to arrest the moslems but to defend them against (his own words) “right wing extremists who might turn up”. I guess that would be our Camera Crew.

Roger Phillips will also be heard telling you of what happened when he made an official complaint to the Police and the Police response. This will not be forgotten or dropped by BNP Wales.

Credit now to Roger, Anthony and those others who were also present and who must remain anonymous.

Thanks also to all who helped fund this operation. Still think your money was wasted Dowlish? Contact me.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

This article from ‘rugfish and politics’ is about the demographic features of the population of the United Kingdom, including population density, ethnicity, education level, health of the populace, economic status, religious affiliations and other aspects of the population.

According to the 2001 census, the total population of the United Kingdom was 58,789,194—the third-largest in the European Union (behind Germany and metropolitan France) and the 21st-largest in the world. Its overall population density is one of the highest in the world, due to the particularly high population density in England. Almost one-third of the population lives in England’s southeast and is predominantly urban and suburban, with about 8.2 million in the capital city of England, London. The United Kingdom’s extremely high literacy rate (99%) is attributable to universal public education introduced for the primary level in 1870 and secondary level in 1900. Education is compulsory from the ages of 5 to 16, with an option to continue education free of charge in the form of A-Levels, vocational training or apprenticeship to age 18. About two-fifths of British students go on to post-secondary education (18+). The Church of England and the Church of Scotland function as the official national churches in their respective countries, but all the major religions found in the world are represented in the United Kingdom.

The UK’s population is predominantly White British.

Being located close to continental Europe, the countries that formed the United Kingdom were subject to many invasions and migrations, especially from Scandinavia and the continent, including Roman occupation for several centuries. Historically, British people were thought to be descended mainly from the different ethnic stocks that settled there before the 11th century; The Britons, Anglo-Saxons, Romans, Vikings and the Normans, who had lived in Northern France. However, recent genetic analysis appears to indicate that around 80% of British DNA comes from an indigenous population who settled Britain around 12,000 years ago, with subsequent invaders contributing very little to the gene-pool. LINK

The case for replacement through mass migration, which WILL effect the genepool?

NONE

Mass migration to the UK did not begin fully until 1948. The native population of the United Kingdom has never been asked whether they agree with it and no debate on the economic, social or cultural benefits and drawbacks, has ever been conducted.

David Cameron (in the video), relates to ‘Operation Black Vote’, and to a history of ‘racism’ against black people in Britain who he says should take their ‘rightful’ place, but the sovereign will of the British people has never been sought nor gained in relation to any government policy or treaty in respect of mass migration.

The video shows that mass migration is in fact a social construct to create a global workforce, global consumers, and global corporate profits with no regard at all to criminality or to the cultural erosion , family break up and displacement of civilizations which took a millennium to make, of all peoples which businesses and politicians simply use as their economic slaves in no different a way than once did ancient Rome.

Protest

To protest against this destruction of our gene-pool, people, race, society, culture and the discrimination against you which is undermining your individual opportunity to better the lives of you and your family, you should write to your MP and ask who gave him the authority to do this, and ask him to provide you with all relevant information regarding all government decision making in regard to immigration since 1948.

You should also ask, what measures has he taken to raise issues of criminality checks on all immigrants into this country since 1948, and ask that he provides you with evidence of the checks under the Freedom of Information Act.

You should compile a file as to the facts in regard to former criminal prosecutions of individuals prior to them being declared a British citizen.

That’s if you’re interested in whether any were sex-traffickers, pedophiles, muggers, robbers, gun dealers, drug pushers, drug abusers and child abusers etc.

And you should seek information why a person who has committed bigamy was permitted into this country to continue to live in bigamy since it is and was against the law.

Lastly,

You should ask your MP whether he signed the Early Day Motion signed by 122 MP’s to recognise the indigenous rights of those people native to Britain of which you are one, and ask him why he signed or indeed did not sign.

Your MP MUST give a written reply to your questions.

Get these worms out of our woodwork and make them understand that THEY are our servants not we theirs.

Rugfish,

Share this post:

Hide Sites

All European countries are run by corrupt and treacherous elites, committed to destroying national identities via third-world mass immigration, political correctness and race-hate laws, and the persecution of anyone that dares oppose this platform

Sweden is such an example of this. ‘The Local’

Once an ethnically homogeneous country with low crime and no social tension, Sweden has become a multiracial hell-hole, mainly due to the huge number of Muslims and African immigrants allowed to settle there by leftist politicians wishing to make Sweden more diverse.

The effect of this enrichment is evident in the number of violent crimes (in particular rape) committed by those invited invaders against the native Swedes.

Other instances are the frequent riots carried out by young Muslims whenever they feel they have been ‘disrespected’.

The latest riot reported occured in the Stockholm suburb of Rinkeby on the night of the 8th of June when 50-60 youths pelted police with stones and set light to a building.

“It is a war zone out here, it is raining stones”, said one witness who wished to remain anonymous.

According to another witness a bus trying to enter the deprived area was forced to stop.

“Not a single window on the bus was intact,” an eye witness said.

Police were told something was afoot earlier in the evening as youths gathered on the streets arming themselves with paving stones.

“They did all they could to attract our attention,” said Mats Brännlund at Stockholm police.

But police decided to react first when a building housing a mentor programme for young people in the area, burst into flames.

“We had to help the emergency services to get through,” Brännlund said.

In total around 20 police patrols with dogs were present in the area throughout the night as they tried to restore calm. Police vehicles were also subjected to stone throwing.

“If you attack the police with stones and set buildings alight then I would venture to suggest that it can be classified as rioting,” he said.

The fire services deployed 21 staff from three fire stations at the location.

A branch of the Nordea bank was attacked at around midnight with the local police station also being the target of stone throwing youths. Two men were detained in connection with the police station attack.

According to media reports on the cause of the outbreak of violence, it may have been the reaction to an argument at a party in the area earlier in the evening, but these reports have not been confirmed by police.

A couple of months before, another riot erupted in the Malmö district of Rosengård with police forced to seal off the area before regaining control of the situation.

Some 20 police units, a total of 50 officers were deployed to the troubled Malmö suburb in an attempt to calm the situation as around 20 youths rampaged through the district leaving behind them incidents of fires and the vandalisation of property.

“We have concluded that there were a total of five fires. A couple of cars, as well as a recycling station, were some of the things burning,” Peter Martinsson at Skåne police told the ‘Dagens Nyheter’ daily.

Police were called to the area in the vicinity of Ramels väg in Rosengård at around 9pm. Residents of the area had become concerned about gangs of youths, and feared fighting would break out.

Fire fighters were obliged to seek a police escort as they were subjected to stone throwing whilst battling to put out the fires in various parts of the district.

Sound familiar?

In Sweden just like France, and in Britain a few days ago, Muslim youths think they are entitled to use violence toward anyone they believe responsible for their problems.

As is usual in these cases it is common to hear brain dead bleeding heart liberals moaning about how unfairly the Muslims are treated, and how little government does to help them, and of course accusing the Police ‘service’ of being racist.

The truth as we all know is that these Muslim youths should not be in Europe in the first place, because no one asked the native Britons, Swedes, French and other Europeans if they wanted to be invaded by third-world immigrants. (By the way there is no such thing as a legal asylum seeker)

In the UK, recently disclosed documents prove that Labour had planned mass immigration to make Britain multicultural even though they knew that native Britons were strongly opposed to it.

The same is true of Sweden and that is why we won’t rest until this invasion is stopped and reversed, and the politicians who wanted it are put on trial for treason.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As David Cameron warns of painful budget cuts needed to reduce the £160bn deficit, nationalists will be delighted to know that there is still money left for ethnic minorities.

An example of this comes from the Daily Star where a few days ago it reported that a cemetery is to be adapted at a cost of £150,000 to make it suitable for Muslims to be buried there.

Muslim burial plots need to face north-east, with the prophet Mohammed’s birthplace of Mecca to the south-east on their right.

Designated spaces at High Wycombe cemetery in Buckinghamshire are running out.

So the council has decided on new burial areas, walls, paths and steps. Work is expected to start in the autumn.

One local resident, who did not wish to be named, grumbled: “Yet again, thousands of pounds are being spent for the benefit of the Muslim community.” Councils have a statutory duty to provide burial space for people of all faiths.

The idea of burying Muslims alongside Christian graves was ruled out after a report prepared for councillors said it would be unpopular would involve extra maintenance costs.

A request made for land at a local Church of England burial ground to be deconsecrated for Muslim use was refused.

Muslims must try to complete funeral rites within 24 hours of a death.

Bodies are buried in their graves, without coffins, if local laws allow this, on their right sides – which must face Mecca.

Tombstones, flowers and markers are discouraged.

Church of England diocesan registrar Canon John Rees, said: “Everyone resident in a parish has a right to be buried in its churchyard if it is not full.

“In this case control of the cemetery lies with the council, not the church.”

Would the Turkish, Saudi, Pakistan governments spend money to make a cemetery suitable for Christians who want to be buried there?

We know the answer and we cannot blame those countries because, just like us they want to preserve their society and culture, unlike our elected politicians in Westminster.

Let’s not forget that it was our PM a few years ago who stated that, “native Britons should adapt to the Muslim way of life” (para).

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Swedish National Democratic Party (there is a translate button) had its version of the RWB on June 6th, one of the main speakers was James Whittall, I urge you to watch the video on Youtube. His speech to our fellow nationalists in Sweden was stirring, they have the same problems we do and in that sense they recognised the truth of Mr Whittall’ words. Stirring stuff from a rising star in the nationalist firmament.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Boris betrays the Black cab drivers, watch this video of Richard Barnbrook and Chris Roberts.
Several good points are made, and attention is drawn to the hard work and financial suffering the aspiring cabbie has to go through to gain the coveted badge for hire.

The scrappage system means that the owner of the cab will not get a decent return on his outlay of something in the region of £40,000. Maintaining a black cab is far more expensive than for an ordinary vehicle, and if after fifteen years the owner is forced to scrap it, what is the point of doing ‘the knowledge’ for three years to be out of pocket on a capital outlay?
Another good point is the safety aspect, how safe do you feel in a black cab? A lot safer I am sure than using a mini cab from some back street outfit run by some fly by night unlicensed hacks. I do not recall ever hearing of a licensed black cab driver being convicted of kidnapping, robbery or rape, do you?

The life of a cabbie is hard enough in these straitened times without the financial penalties Boris has planned for them. I think Boris does not want the iconic black cab on the streets of London, what other reason would he have for increasing the cost of running one?

Share this post:

Hide Sites

From ‘rugfish’ on The Home of The Green Arrow. http://tinyurl.com/344s5mm

It may be sooner than you think, that the age of reason will return to European politics before long but certainly before the turn of a new decade. If I was a gambling man presented with the options of complete break up, a two tier system, an Anglo – French – German – alliance, or a new alliance of sovereign nations working together in a co-operative trading union as friendly neighbours, then I think I’d have to go with the latter but it’s anyone’s guess as to precisely what will happen.

How do I know this?

Well I’m guessing of course as I’m not psychic, I’m just a normal human being who understands that when a secret is out, that it doesn’t take long for people to question, mistrust those who kept the secret, and eventually threaten to walk away shaking their heads in disbelief.

So when I read this today when the unelected cardboard cut out politician, EU President Van Rumpwinkle admitted that the people of Europe were conned into accepting a single currency, it sent my EU alarm ringing until it fell off the desk.

This is how it goes….

“Van Rompuy admits citizens were misled about the euro”

The Telegraph reports that EU Council President Herman Van Rompuy has admitted that the “man in the street” was misled about the true economic and political implications of adopting the euro. “Nobody ever told the proverbial man in the street that sharing a single currency was not just about making peoples’ lives easier when doing business or travelling abroad, but also about being directly affected by economic developments in the neighbouring countries,” he said on Tuesday evening. “Being in the ‘Euro zone’ means, monetarily speaking, being part of one ‘Euroland’.”

He added that “We are clearly confronted with a tension within the system, the ill-famous dilemma of being a monetary union and not a full-fledged economic and political union. This tension has been there since the single currency was created. However, the general public was not really made aware of it.”

The article cites Open Europe’s new briefing, “They said it: How the EU elite got it wrong on the euro”, and quotes Open Europe’s Vincenzo Scarpetta saying, “The euro zone crisis is not simply about economic failure but also a breakdown in trust between the political class and European citizens. The EU elite simply got it wrong on the euro.”

Meanwhile, in an interview with Süddeutsche Zeitung, Commissioner for Budgets Janusz Lewandowski said, ahead of his talks with Chancellor Merkel and German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, “I want to see to what extent [German] public opinion has changed his mind about European aims [...] Germans have clearly become more eurosceptic: they believe they must pay for other EU citizens’ mistakes and good life”.

Ah, I bet you’re thinking what’s that got to do with the break up of the EU right?

Okay, I’m either completely off my rocker, I’ve spent far too much time in the garden, I’ve been studying EU lies too long, or I’m completely normal like you and I can see the riots in Greece, and protests throughout the EU, which tell me that people are not happy.

They are striking about anything from the price of bread (cost of living), to immigration, to retirement ages, austerity measures, layoff’s, unemployment, capitalist b’stards who take your eyes out, climate change, aid to foreign countries, GM crops, babies being aborted, babies not being aborted, the age of consent for homosexuals, Islam, oh….and 1,001 other reasons to display why they are totally sick with their governments.

But even with all that I can boil it down to economics as to why the EU will fail because a single currency with fluctuating markets, is quite impossible to hold together unless you have one political system.

It may have dawned on people for instance that Germany and France make most cars as an example, and that Germany has the steel production and Poland is still digging coal whilst some French cars are made there to help keep Poland’s economic head above water. It hasn’t gone unnoticed by French car workers who are out of work either. But there are twenty seven different retirement ages across Europe too, along with mass immigration into every country where jobs are scarce, car workers are out on their ears, and are presumably being told their skills are no good when they apply for that job taken by a foreigner.

It’s another story of course when you look at where the biggest problems lie in Greece, Spain, and Portugal, which just happen to be major holiday and retirement destinations for many Europeans.

Certainly their economies took a major tumble on tourist trade along with their construction industries which are seeing massive areas of empty tables in one time busy resorts, and half built yet vacated properties which were once intended to fund their economic expansions.

So Greece borrowed in order to sustain its economy and Spain has just seized two banks which would otherwise fail for reason of defaulted property loans, owing to…..a lack of ability to meet mortgage payments on….property. (Add retiring Brits to that).

So the sensible thing to do of course would be for Greece, Spain and Portugal, and possibly Italy, to create another currency for markets built not on industry but on tourism.

e.g. Like the Lira, Peseta and Escudo for instance…..like they already had before they were ‘conned’ into accepting a single currency.

It would make sense to do this of course before the entire economy of Europe collapses under the weight of debt which cannot be repaid without an industrial base and plenty of customers, or a restoration of tourist trade. But when the rest of Europe is NOT making its citizens more wealthy for reason their jobs, educations and services are taken up – by foreigners -, and there’s a rather sizeable cost incurred for that along with the 20 million illegal immigrants in Europe, then something has to give quite quickly if the EU single currency is not to fail entirely.

Perhaps that is one reason why investors are buying dollars instead of Euro’s, and why the Euro is tumbling in value but as I say, I’m only guessing.

What do you think?

Oh, by the way don’t go asking Cameron or Clegg, because one hasn’t a clue and the other has that many EU stars in his eyes he can’t see the EU wood for the EU tree which is about to hit him.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I know ‘London Patriot’ is primarily concerned with supporting the BNP in the UK and in particular London, and it might seem that this article is beyond its remit, but I feel that it will bolster the confidence of British people to know that our cousins over the water are members; and support the ideals of the party.
Is it so strange that an American comes to realise that nationalists, from whatever country they hail from have the same ideals?
Nationalism is the tie that binds us to heritage and country, we should support nationalists all over the world.
I am proud to call John a kinsman.

http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/index.php/news/newsbnp/1857-why-this-american-became-a-member-of-the-bnp

BigJohn
Our American Cousin and BNP Member – John Charles Bush

I remember the day well in August of 2009 when the US news media reported that many so called “right wing” parties had done well in the EU elections. This suddenly aroused my curiosity as I turned the volume up on my TV to hear the news. Suddenly a man appeared that I had never seen or heard of named Nick Griffin. He was standing at a podium giving a “Victory” speech . The media immediately said that the voters were fed up with the ruling Labour Party and had decided to make change for the BNP.

Well I had also never heard of the BNP so I turned off the TV and went to my computer where I knew I could get better info from the internet. I simply typed in BNP and their website came up on the info page. It was an astoundingly professional looking site! The Union Flag was all over the front page. All of the articles were very well written and easily understandable. My curiosity turned to fascination as I read more and more. As I looked through the site I came across a BNP chatroom and I decided to go in and speak.

I was a little nervous being an American and I didn’t know if I would be welcomed. Every person in that room turned out to be very nice and I immediately felt an attachment brewing. These are my kinds of people I thought! They were all interested in knowing a few things about the US as well as the state where I live which is Kentucky. Very few of them knew much about Kentucky other than KFC and I knew very little about the UK other than the Beatles. The chatroom became an interesting place to exchange our cultures as I returned night after night.

One day I asked a BNP member if Americans were allowed to join. He told me absolutely and that I should do so at my nearest convenience. Well to make a short story shorter I joined that very moment and my membership card arrived a few weeks later. I am so proud to carry it in my wallet. My family came from Britain to America many years ago so I feel a very strong attachment to the BNP because it is so traditionally British.

When I think of Britain I think of the Union Flag as well as the English. The other parties don’t even look British judging by their looks and advertising. You would think they were from some other country if you didn’t know better. However, one can just take a simple first glimpse of the BNP and know they are British.

This is the sole reason I joined the BNP.

John Charles Bush

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I reported in a previous article that one of the achievements of the BNP in Barking & Dagenham was that it brought St George Day into the borough again.

Never before has the council spent money on financing events aimed at celebrating and raising awareness of an important part of  English cultural heritage.

What we achieved is the exception rather than the rule and an article published on the Daily Star confirms that.

In a north London borough furious parents have blasted a school’s plans to shun St George’s Day today and celebrate Turkey instead.

Pupils brought home leaflets for International Turkish Day, which prompted one angry dad to rage: “We should be celebrating St George’s Day, not Turkish day.”

But headteacher Sue Maran, of Rokesly School in Hornsey, north London, said: “What it should say, and what we’re celebrating, is International Children’s Day.”

She said a lunch on offer had a Turkish theme.

This story proves, once again, that British education system has been infiltrated by Marxists with the aim of brainwashing British students by making them deny/forget their cultural past and convince them it is shameful to be English.

They did the same in Barking & Dagenham until the British National Party in 2006 had 12 councillors elected, and our activists have worked hard every year to organise a St George parade.

Would the council finance all those events without the BNP efforts to promote this cultural event?

Of course not.

What this school did is not just immoral but stupid, after all anyone can celebrate St George regardless of his/her ethnicity and in fact I’ve got a St George flag this morning from an Asian lady.

We don’t need to explain that this is part of a bigger plan aimed at the destruction of nations and creation of a new world order.

Therefore what has happened in Barking can be seen by nationalists as the victory of common sense over political correctness.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

One of the questions that people constantly ask the British National Party is, what it has achieved in Barking & Dagenham?

One of the things it has achieved is that for the first time in years the Council will be holding a series of events to celebrate St George’ day on the 23rd of April.

On  stroll you will see St George’ flags everywhere, libraries are going to  hold coffee mornings and displays of St George’ regalia, quiz shows for children and a St George’ parade will take place on the streets of Barking.

This is quite amazing when you learn that until last year no official celebration was held and many didn’t know the meaning of St George’ day.

This change of heart came about because BNP activists for the last few years have held a parade that has proved to be very popular.

I took part in the one last year, although the event was not of a political nature, drivers sounded their horns to express their support.

I also remember some children asking if we were celebrating the Queen’ birthday, a sign of the effect that the marxist indoctrination in our schools has had, and whose aim is to make students ashamed of being British.

It has became impossible for the council to ignore this celebration, and this year thanks to our work, St George’ day will be celebrated like never before.

Another sign of BNP influence can be found on Barking & Dagenham’ council website, where you will find references to the English and Englishness, there is also a link to a website aimed at informing people about British history and its culture:

http://www.icons.org.uk/

This is quite an achievement for a political party punching above its weight.

Given that government is doing its damndest to destroy the British culture it’s no surprise that very few councils are celebrating St George day (but plenty of them are still spending taxpayers’ money for Islamic, Hindu and African’ festivals).

This is one of the achievements of the BNP even though for the moment, we are in opposition.

We don’t need to enumerate what we could achieve, if in a couple of weeks we take control of the council.

Small wonder the whole establishment is scared of us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Gordon Brown  must think that voters are useless idiots.

In a speech delivered in East London the PM promised a controlled and fairer immigration system and acknowledged that voters are right to be concerned, and I think he really expects us to believe him.

This is the same Gordon Brown who in 2000, according to recently disclosed documents, together with other Labour party’ ministers planned to swamp Britain with a mass immigration in order to change our social structure, and bring them a huge pool of potential Labour voters.

To add insult to the injury, his party has passed dozens of anti-racism laws that make any criticism of immigration or multiracialism a criminal offence.

He has ignored the concerns of the people for 13 years, and denied the public a debate on this topic, he is trying to give the impression that NuLabour has learned from its mistakes and he and his Fabian fellow travellers are starting to listen to people.

We all know that the PM is committed to controlling immigration; in the same way that Pete Doherty is serious about kicking his drug addiction, Boy George giving up gay sex, and the UAF ending its politically motivated violence programme.

This is why many political commentators are urging David (mini me Tony) Cameron to make clear his plan to reduce immigration in order to prevent the British National Party capitalising on the issue.

Unfortunately for them the Conservatives do not have a credible plan, and it is not just because they fear accusations of racism.

Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, strongly supports an amnesty for the one million or so illegal immigrants living in the UK.

So far no one in the Tory party has distanced themselves from him and this shows that David Cameron and the Tories support BoJo and his amnesty scheme.

So far the only thing we know about the Conservatives is that they want a cap in the number of immigrants allowed in the UK.

It sounds good except that under the Lisbon Treaty it is the EU that has the last word on immigration and asylum and therefore nothing can be done without the approval of the EU bureaucrats.

That is why anyone expecting the Tories to offer a sensible alternative will be disappointed.

Are we nationalists surprised?

Of course not.

Let’s not forget Gordon Brown reneged on his promise to give UK voters a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty and the same can be said for the “Cast Iron Guarantee” of the Conservatives.

Unfortunately for them they think the voters are idiots, fortunately for us the voters are only asleep; and this is why support for the British National Party is increasing despite the machinations of the establishment to prevent our growth.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It’s a  fact that not only Ethnic, but long term civic Britons are against mass immigration. We now have an “elephant in the room”.

This elephant has been brushed under the carpet by the MSM, (it makes a hell of a bump) despite which the UK musical chair party carries on trying to brainwash us into accepting mass immigration and multicultural diversity.

This is an article published in the National Post, a Canadian newspaper; immigrants to the USA and Canada are opposed to more mass immigration (para).

It’s worth a read, not only because an article like this would never be allowed in a British newspaper, but because both the USA and Canada are huge countries, whose citizens are in the main immigrants.

If they have a problem with mass immigration given the size of both countries, what can be said of Britain, the second most overcrowded country in Europe, and in the World Premier League, with an indigenous population that has lived here for several thousand years?

It is widely believed that most immigrants support high immigration levels. Political parties in particular buy into this assumption, assuming that bringing in large numbers of newcomers will increase their support among ethnic voters. Research in the United States, however, suggests that this is a mistaken premiss and that immigrants think immigration levels should be lowered.

A recent poll commissioned by the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington, D.C., found that 56% of Asian-American voters surveyed thought immigration levels in the United States were too high, 7% thought they were too low and 14% just right. Among Hispanic voters, the results were not that different, i.e. 57%, 5% and 18% respectively.

It is true that some newcomers do not want immigration levels reduced -particularly those who hope to bring in large numbers of extended family members. But for many immigrants already in the country however, the arrival of a great many more in our larger cities means increased competition for the jobs they themselves are seeking.

There is no shortage of data showing that immigrants who arrived in recent decades have been much less successful economically than those who came before 1980. Their earnings have been much lower and their poverty rates significantly higher, with estimates that the benefits they receive over what they pay in taxes is in the order of tens of billions of dollars every year.

While research suggests that a number of factors have contributed to their weak economic performance, one of them is almost certainly that we are bringing in far more people than we need and can successfully integrate into the economy. This is particularly the case during a recession — as was demonstrated during the economic downturn in the early 1990s, when new immigrants fared particularly badly on the job market and never really recovered after the skills they brought with them became dated before they could find suitable employment.

Why then do political parties persist in maintaining such high immigration levels if they are so costly to Canadians in general and not even popular among most immigrants?

Because those who claim to represent newcomers often have agendas of their own that differ significantly from the interests of those whom they are supposedly serving. Most notable are organizations that purport to represent ethnic communities but that don’t reflect the concerns of the latter.

Chief among these are groups that receive government funding to assist in the settlement of newcomers and provide such services as English language training. Were immigration intake to decline, their level of public funding would decline accordingly. Such organizations also have a vested interest in the continuous growth of the ethnic communities they claim to represent since this will give them greater political clout.

An example of such divergent interests could be seen in the late 1990s when a report commissioned by the federal government recommended that newcomers have a working knowledge of English or French when they arrive in Canada since research showed clearly that such an ability was key to their successful integration. The proposal was successfully attacked by organizations that could stand to lose significant government funding if newcomers arrived already proficient in English and French and did not require language classes after their arrival.

Interestingly, a poll was carried out in the Vancouver area at the time showed that not only 75% of Canadian born but 73% of immigrants themselves supported the report’s recommendation that newcomers be competent in English or French when they arrived.

Surveys show far more Canadians want immigration levels lowered rather than increased. This is particularly the case in large cities such as Toronto where inhabitants are concerned about large-scale immigration for such reasons as stress on educational and health-care systems, cost to taxpayers, impact on the environment, effect on the employment market, difficulties with integration into the social fabric of Canada, etc.

Such concerns are largely ignored at election time in the expectation that most people born here do not care enough about the problems of immigration to make it a voting issue — while immigrants do care about immigration policy and will vote for whatever party supports increased intake.

If the American survey results are any guide to the situation in Canada, the assumption that most newcomers support high intake is wrong and suggests that our political parties have been listening too closely to those who claim to represent immigrants rather than to the immigrants themselves.

- Martin Collacott is a former Canadian ambassador in Asia and the Middle East and now lives in Vancouver.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

News Shopper.

http://tinyurl.com/yk7rv3a

Do you suffer from pent up rage, do you find yourself annoyed or angry, are you bad tempered and short with others, do you feel uncomfortable or uneasy when strolling peacefully in London?

You probably live in Lewisham…then again it might be Lambeth, or Enfield.

According to the latest statistics, Lewisham is one of the angriest places in London, it came seventh in a survey carried out by ‘The British  Association of Anger Management’. These results are from a study which took place between January and December 2008. Lambeth was top of the league for anger, followed by Enfield.

Inability to handle anger and outrage are highlighted by ‘BAAM’ .                                                                                                                                                  The ‘BAAM’ director Mr Mike Fisher, “I believe issues such as crime, violence, road rage, addiction, eating disorders, depression and many other mental health issues all stem from our inability as a culture to handle or express our feelings, especially those of anger”                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           1) What does he mean by ‘culture’, does he mean the artificial construct we have been forced to live with for the last 60 years, or does he mean the ‘culture’ that existed before the ‘multicultural’ hell that passes for ‘culture’ ?

2) I do not recall fifty years ago when we had a relatively stable society, many of us having problems with eating disorders, or the violence we experience these days, or depression, or addiction, or the myriad other imported problems that, if we were allowed to express our feelings without fear of recrimination, would be laid firmly at the door of the traitors that have led us by the nose down the ‘Road to Perdition’.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          I am deliberate in my choice of words in the last sentence, the idea that we must refrain from commenting about how we feel is the fuel that feeds the fire of resentment towards our betrayers, and so feeds the fire of Patriotism.

3) What do these Boroughs have in common?                                                                                                                                                                                                     I refer you to the previous paragraphs!!

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Afghanistan (With apologies To Kipling), by an Anon British soldier

When you’re lying alone in your Afghan bivvy,
And your life it depends on some MOD civvie
When the body armour’s shared (one set between three),
And the firefight’s not like it is on TV,
Then you’ll look to your oppo, your gun and your God,
As you follow that path all Tommies have trod.

When the gimpy has jammed and you’re down to one round,
And the faith that you’d lost is suddenly found.
When the Taliban horde is close up to the fort,
And you pray that the arty don’t drop a round short.
Stick to your sergeant like a good squaddie should,
And fight them like satan or one of his brood

Your pay it won’t cover your needs or your wants,
So just stand there and take all the Taliban’s taunts
Nor generals nor civvies can do aught to amend it,
Except make sure you’re kept in a place you can’t spend it.
Three fifty an hour in your Afghani cage,
Not nearly as much as the minimum wage.

Your missus at home in a foul married quarter
With damp on the walls and a roof leaking water
Your kids miss their mate, their hero, their dad;
They’re missing the childhood that they should have had
One day it will be different, one day by and by,
As you all stand there and watch, to see the pigs fly

Just like your forebears in mud, dust and ditch

You’ll march and you’ll fight, and you’ll drink and you’ll bitch
Whether Froggy or Zulu, or Jerry, or Boer
The Brits will fight on ‘til the battle is o’er.
You may treat him like dirt, but nowt will unnerve him
But I wonder sometimes, if the country deserves him.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Video of Dewsbury MP Shahid Malik predicting a Muslim Parliament and Muslim Prime Minister in the not too distant future is pretty chilling viewing. In the same speech he gloated about the amount of British Taxpayer money going to Muslim countries over £1 billion (whilst old people here die of cold), which he was instrumental in obtaining as a British Government Minister.

Question: Who can put a stop to this act of national suicide?
Answer: The British people!

WAKE UP BRITANNIA, TOMORROW COULD BE TOO LATE!

Share this post:

Hide Sites