The same weekend that nationalists attended the indigenous family weekend more than a million people attended a “largely peaceful” Notting Hill Carnival at the weekend, marred only by a handful of thugs throwing stones at police.

Scotland Yard said overall crime was down by almost a third with 235 arrests over the two days, most of them for drugs offences.

More than 5,000 officers were on duty in a £6 million policing operation which saw few outbreaks of trouble in its 47th year and a weekend of mostly good weather.

Mayor Boris Johnson was among more than 600,000 revellers who turned out for the climax of Europe’s largest street festival — bathed in glorious bank holiday Monday sunshine after heavy showers had drenched the crowds of about 400,000 who lined the three-and-a-half mile route to watch the Children’s Day parade on Sunday.

Thousands of colourfully dressed dancers followed the floats. Organisers estimate revellers consumed five tons of chicken and 25,000 bottles of rum while some 16,000 records were played at 41 sound systems.

“Champagne” Lewis, 40, who runs an after-school club, came down from Manchester with two friends.
She said: “We come every year and it just gets better and better. It’s so exciting, I feel like a child on Christmas Eve. I love it.”

Eva Jackson, 25, and her friend Mariska Cornelis, 26, flew from Rotterdam. Ms Jackson said: “It’s so much fun, we come every year. Our whole plane was full of people coming to the carnival. The Netherlands is very multi-cultural and there’s a carnival in Rotterdam but it’s nothing like this.”

Police used mobile metal detectors and number-plate recognition cameras to put a security ring around the event. More than 20 people had weapons seized and a gun was found in a car.

Chief Inspector Jo Edwards said the “largely peaceful and fun-filled” event was marred by a small element who threw stones and bottles at police as night fell yesterday.

She said: “Most carnival-goers had a fantastic time. However, as we have seen in previous years, last night saw some people determined to try to ruin it for others who simply wanted to enjoy a day out.”

Scotland Yard said 235 people had been arrested, slightly up on last year’s 222.

In a separate operation British Transport Police arrested 53 people on the Underground and trains.

The vast majority of arrests were for drugs offences, although there were also four arrests for firearms offences, 20 for carrying knives and other weapons, three for robbery and two for GBH.

Two stabbing victims were among a total of 706 people dealt with by the London Ambulance Service.

On tuesday morning hundreds of cleaners moved in to sweep away tons of rubbish. Kensington and Chelsea’s refuse contractor Sita UK said it hoped to be the first waste-disposal company to send all the rubbish from a festival for recycling.

So the Metropolitan Police was delighted because an unspecified number of thugs (we would like to know now many) just threw stones and bottles at them and only two people were stabbed.

If these incidents are not serious I wonder what the enrichers need to do in order to convince the Police that this event should be banned for security reasons.

If there was a drop in the crime figures it was probably due to the bad weather on Sunday keeping a lot of people away.

Nationalists will have noticed that the GLA can find £6m to pay for the policing of this Afro-Caribbean event but it claims it has no funds for St George Day’ celebrations.

When the treacherous liberals claim that the carnival is an important multicultural event they do have a point, it demonstrates everything that is wrong with mass immigration and multiculturalism.

The history of this celebration can be traced back to the late ’50 when West Indians rioted in 1958 after some of them were the victims of racist attacks.

The first wave of West Indians settled in Notting Hill because it was the only place they could find any accommodation, and clearly the indigenous Britons living there didn’t want to see their area turning in a Caribbean ghetto and they becoming the minority.

There is some truth in that, but at that time the situation was created by the government when it allowed the first immigration wave from the Caribbean on the grounds that they were needed to fill job vacancies.

Of course there is no justification for any racist assault but if native Britons were angry it was because no one asked them if they wanted their area to be enriched in the first place.

Sound familiar?
Yes, because Notting Hill was the prelude to what was going to happen in other parts of Britain in the following decades.

The carnival may be an example of what is great about multicultural London but the muggings, stabbings and assaults on Police officers that take place during this event act as a reminder of the negative effects of third world immigration that have brought many kind of crimes (such as gang-related crimes) that were previously unheard off.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We all know that the establishment puts an enormous amount of effort into destroying the British National Party.

Thus far they have failed, but they will not give up.

We are the only party prepared to address issues that affect a large part of the electorate, one of these issues is housing.

Anyone on the waiting list for council accommodation is well aware that immigrants and asylum seekers are not only at the front of the queue but get the newest and best houses and flats.

The government has not only denied this, but accuses us of incitement to racial hatred for exposing a scandal that has been widely known for a long time.

it seems our efforts are beginning to pay off as the Daily Express reports that town hall chiefs will be given more freedom to put British-born families ahead of immigrants in the queue for council houses under new Government proposals to be unveiled this autumn.

Ministers want local authorities to ease the growing resentment among many white working class voters that newcomers are getting preferential treatment.

They want “local connections” to count in applications for social housing rather than handing out homes simply on the basis of need.

But the plan goes directly against multi-cultural equality programmes that were promoted under Labour, and it is likely to be resisted by many Labour-run councils.

Tory Housing Minister Grant Shapps yesterday acknowledged current rules for allocating social homes were breeding resentment.

He said: “It causes a great deal of concern and is very problematic for social cohesion when people find they aren’t provided with any preference when they are actually in the area they have lived in for a very long time.”

He said councils will be expected to take into account “the desire of local people” when drawing up their housing policies.

Mr Shapps added: “We plan to provide more flexibility to local authorities to judge the proper criteria for the waiting list. Apart from a limited number of prescribed cases — homelessness, for example — there should be the flexibility to write your own housing allocation criteria.”

Resentment over council housing is credited with boosting support in deprived areas for ‘extreme-Right’ organisations such as the British National Party. Recent research suggests that more than one in 10 of the country’s 3.5 million social homes goes to immigrants.

And more than £230million of taxpayers’ money is spent every year providing homes for asylum seekers. Under present rules, councils are expected to allocate council houses on the basis of need. The result is that the homeless, the elderly and families with many children living in cramped conditions tend to come first.

This means that immigrant families, which are frequently larger than their British-born counterparts may take precedence in the queue.

Around five million applicants across the country are currently on the waiting list. The rules state that immigrants must be settled in the UK, or come from an EU country to qualify for housing.
Councillor Edward Lister, Conservative leader of Wandsworth Council in south London said: “If the housing allocation rules are going to be changed, we would welcome that. We want to give a measure of priority to local residents. It builds stability in the community and keeps families together.”

We will wait to see if this proposal becomes law as this coalition government cannot be trusted to return all five of your fingers if you shake hands with them.

There is no doubt that a change in the criteria for allocation of council accommodation is long overdue.

Even if (a bloody big if) there is a sensible case for mass immigration, it doesn’t mean that these newcomers should get council housing as this undermines the weak argument about the (supposedly) economic benefit of mass immigration.

It is not a coincidence that the present and previous governments, rather than trying to defend the indefensible, denied that such discrimination was taking place and accused us of telling lies.

Unfortunately for them the huge number of indigenous Britons on the waiting list for housing means there are the same number of potential BNP supporters, and no amount of smear campaigns will convince the people they can trust the Lib Con alliance. This is why Labour Barking MP Margaret Hodge, a couple of months ago who told BNP activists to “pack up and leave”, wrote an article in the Daily Telegraph claiming that the ‘far-right’ can be defeated for good only if long term residents get priority in the assigning of council houses and benefits.
Hmmmmmm, I think she knows her goose is cooked if this “local connection” law is not passed.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The British National Party is setting the agenda of the main political parties.

Evidence of this can be found in The Observer, which printed an article on the benefits of mass immigration.

It is reported in full so that nationalists can better understand the point I am trying to make.

“The government’s proposal to cap highly skilled immigration from outside the EU is taking flak from business leaders. Employers are arguing that the limit will prevent them hiring the staff they need to deliver the growth that the government is banking on to put Britain back on an even keel. According to today’s report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development and KPMG, around one in six companies intends to recruit migrant workers in the next several months. There will be serious consequences if they cannot, especially given that almost one in 10 private sector firms is already planning to relocate jobs to India, China and eastern Europe in the next year.

In truth, the cap will restrict only the highly skilled migrants who are most obviously economically valuable. So this is hardly going to assuage public concern about high immigration.

It was public unease, expressed through opinion polls over many years, that led the Conservatives to seize on the cap as a flagship policy for the general election. Labour’s early record on immigration, when numbers were increasing fast, meant the party would get no credit later for putting in place one of the most robust and effective immigration systems in the world, with the points-based system as its centrepiece. The cap was much simpler, a seemingly “tough” policy with real voter appeal. But it has left the new government in a very difficult position: it can please immigration sceptics or economic liberals, but not both. At worst, it will please neither. Quite simply, the immigration cap is a bad policy.

Of course, it is legitimate for the government to take a view on the level of immigration that the UK can manage. People will disagree on whether the objective of “net immigration in the tens, rather than hundreds of thousands” is the right one, but it seems reasonable enough, in principle, for the government to have such an objective. After all, immigration has been very high in the last decade, although it is now falling.

The decrease is probably largely a result of the economic downturn, as well as tighter rules in recent years. Lower net immigration helps to take some of the heat out of a public and political debate that has become polarised and sometimes vicious, stigmatising immigrants and giving succour to the far right.

There are plenty of myths, but little hard evidence that recent immigration has caused significant problems to the UK as a whole. On the contrary, the evidence suggests that immigration has, on balance, brought significant economic and social benefits.

However, where immigration has had negative local impacts, for example by increasing pressure on public services, the consequences have too often been felt by the poorer and more deprived communities. But the government is at risk of confusing symptoms with causes. Reducing immigration will not provide people with secure and well-paid jobs or with affordable housing.

We need to see migration as part of a wider picture of economic change. In an era of globalisation, migration has been an important part of the UK’s economic model. Britain has been happy to see its best companies sold to foreign owners; it can hardly complain when the new proprietors want to bring in some of their own staff.

For many organisations, having international staff is a benefit rather than a reflection of skills shortages. The multinational company bringing a senior executive from its New York office to its HQ in London, the ballet company hiring the newest talent from Cuba, or the academic department recruiting great minds reflect the fact that in many fields the UK has become a global centre of excellence.

We should not forget the contribution that waves of immigrants have made. The commitment of the Ugandan Asians is still apparent across Britain. The US has consistently shown what smart and humane immigration policies can offer in return, economically and socially.”

So far there is nothing new, The Observer is using the same used and abused arguments to convince native Britons that being dispossessed of their land is good for them.

However the real surprise can be found in the second part of the comment.

“In their search for foreign staff, employers may be responding to a skills shortages that reflects underinvestment in education and training. In today’s study, 42% of the employers believe literacy skills of British graduates have fallen in the past five years against only 6% who believe they have gone up. We should be worried if UK employers are having to look overseas to find the skilled staff they need.

The UK is consistently failing to train enough engineers and scientists, for example. In other areas, recruitment difficulties seem more likely to reflect low wages and poor terms and conditions than skills shortages. The fact that there is a shortage of senior care workers tells us more about how we undervalue those essential staff than about the ability of British people to do these jobs.

The challenge for government is not to come up with ever more inventive ways of stopping skilled foreign workers coming to the UK, but to address the underlying reasons that mean we need them. Of course, in such fiscally straitened times, this may be easier said than done if the answers are higher wages in the public sector and more investment in education.

The suspicion that some employers are resorting to recruiting immigrant labour to avoid the costs of training British staff, or actively using migrant labour as a way to keep wages down, should be focusing the government’s attention on employment regulation and employers’ obligations to their staff and the wider community. Public concern about immigration would be better addressed by rigorous enforcement of minimum-wage legislation than by caps or limits on skilled migration. Where employers are failing to provide apprenticeships or training for staff, the government needs to encourage them to take responsibility for the training their future workforce. Restricting their access to foreign staff might induce them to do this, but it seems a curiously roundabout way of tackling the problem.

With the introduction of the cap the government is showing an uncharacteristic enthusiasm for intervening in the workings of the free market and is picking a fight with business in the process. The outcome would be better if some of that enthusiasm were directed at the root causes of economic insecurity. And if that requires picking a different fight with business, at least the immigration cap has provided the government with some practice.”

So even the anti-British, anti-whites marxists writing for a far-left paper like The Observer admit that government should address the shortage of qualified people by training native Britons instead of allowing more immigrants.

Of course they are very careful to avoid of being seen as racist (perish the thought) but if you read between the lines they clearly echo the point we have been making for years, namely that companies prefer to hire cheaper and qualified immigrants rather than training native Britons and that the education system is failing to produce qualified people.

Unsurprisingly they are still campaigning for more immigration, but even for The Observer it is becoming more difficult to dismiss as racist our policies.

This is a great achievement for nationalists, who would have believed only a few months ago that such a rag could urge government to put more emphasis on training native workforce?

Further evidence, if needed, that the BNP has never been so powerful even though we have no MPs.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Although government vehemently denies it, we all know that tens of billions of Pounds are wasted every year on immigrants and asylum seekers.

The British National Party has been accused of inciting racial hatred whenever we try to expose the true cost of immigration, but hiding the truth is becoming more difficult for them.

They may like to explain why the £115,000 a week spent on translators helping immigrants claim benefits in Britain. is facing intense scrutiny.

The Government wants to cut the cost of interpreters which last year soared to more than £6 million, a 50 per cent rise.

In the last six years 169,000 immigrants claimed unemployment benefit within six months of getting a National Insurance number.

The benefits alone cost taxpayers £1.4million a week but added to that is the translation bill. Most of it came from providing face-to-face and telephone translation services for people whose grasp of English was not good enough to understand the benefits system.

Employment Minister Chris Grayling said: “It’s been quite clear to us that costs ran out of control under the last Government. We aim to bring the costs down as far as we possibly can. We’ve been very clear that people coming to live and work in the UK need to be able to speak English.”

In 2004, Labour Employment ­Minister Jim Murphy pledged that costs would be curbed but the annual bill has more than doubled from the £2.63 million then.

A spokesman for the TaxPayers’ ­Alliance said: “With translation costs on the rise it’s more important than ever that the government insist newcomers learn English. Negative attitudes towards immigration are fuelled by these sorts of overheads. The cost of document translation has increasingly started to look like a very expensive exercise in politically correct PR”.

Just a question: why bring the costs down instead of stopping the money spent on interpreters altogether?

It is bad enough that people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place are getting unemployment benefit (and this is just one of many benefits) so spending money on interpreters so they can learn how to scrounge more money out of us is clearly unacceptable.

So far according to this article we pay about £80m a year for 169,000 parasites and the cost is clearly higher because it doesn’t include other benefits.

It would make people bloody angry even in good times, in these less than good times they are absolutely fuming.

On the other hand stories like this are useful in waking up people, and to convince them that the only party which will stop this madness is the British National Party.

No wonder the establishment is doing its best to bankrupt and destroy us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

A few months ago we reported on the plan to make Bristol the asylum capital of Britain.

Anyone familiar with the city knows only too well that a huge number of Somalians have been allowed to move there, so that in some quarters native Britons are already a minority.

As usual no one asked the Bristolians if they wanted their city to be enriched, and anyone who dares oppose this plan is branded racist..

Those immigrants are mostly asylum ‘seekers’ or a better description, asylum scroungers that should not have been allowed entry to Britain in the first place as we have no obligation under international law to accept them.

The effects of this enrichment were laid bare by a story reported in the Evening Post about a failed asylum seeker who stalked a 76-year-old grandmother, beat her to the ground, broke her hip and stole her bag – because he did not have enough money for cigarettes.

Abdihamid Omar watched Barbara Newell leave a post office in Lawrence Hill, followed her for 20 minutes and then attacked her from behind, a court heard.

He grabbed her around her throat, kneed her in the back of her leg and pulled at her bag, sending her sprawling to the ground where she broke her hip, repeatedly hitting her arm and calling her a bitch.

Then he bent back the fingers of the 5ft tall pensioner’s hand to make her let go of her bag, containing £36.

Mrs Newell, a widow for 25 years from Redfield, was left with a fractured hip, which had to be replaced, and suffered a heart attack following her ordeal. She feared she was going to die.

Today her family described Omar as “vermin” and called for him to be deported.

Their call was backed by MPs, who said his permission to stay in the UK should be reconsidered.

Bristol Crown Court heard yesterday that Omar had left his native Somalia, was refused asylum but granted Indefinite Leave to Remain, also known as permanent residence.

The 35-year-old, of Haviland House, Lamb Street, St Jude’s, pleaded guilty to robbery.

The court heard he tested positive for cocaine after his arrest but denied using anything other than Khat, an amphetamine- like drug which is chewed.

Jailing him for five years, Judge Michael Roach told him: “I regard this offence as thoroughly nasty and mean.”

Mrs Newell’s son Paul, 49, an HGV driver from Bristol, told the Evening Post: “He should have got at least eight years. I went to pick my mother up today but she is absolutely heartbroken. She wanted to leave the flat but she couldn’t face him. You don’t give in to vermin like that.”

The court heard Omar was captured on CCTV on July 10 both at the post office and running off with Mrs Newell’s bag.

Rodney Wilson, defending, said his client was a devout Muslim (but then it is a ‘religion of peace of course), married with a child and another on the way (Cuckoos?), who was a singer looked up to by youngsters in his community. He said on the day in question his wife and child had gone to London, he went to the cashpoint and only had £6.

Mr Wilson said that after being told he could not use his card in the shop, Omar “went outside, he turned right and sat at the bus stop thinking how he could get some money”.

“He saw a lady leave and go to the left and he decided that he would steal her bag.”

Mrs Newell’s daughter Rosina, 53, a shopworker from St Anne’s, said: “I hope he gets deported. He took away her dignity.”

Indefinite Leave to Remain can lead to British citizenship but can also be revoked if someone granted it then commits a serious offence.

Stephen Williams, Lib Dem MP for Bristol West, which includes Lawrence Hill, said: “Those who have been given the full protection of the British state have an obligation to be law abiding citizens and those who abuse our hospitality should have the full force of the law against them and be returned to their country of origin, if possible.” (yeah I can see that happening! weasel words these…”if possible”)

Mr Williams obviously believes that voters are thick like the UAF thugs that his party support and love so very much.

He knows very well that under European law no one can be deported if he/she can prove that going back to his/her home country his/her life would be in danger.

And what is the position of the Dim-Lemons on that matter?

And what is their position on immigration?

We know the answer, further comment is not needed.

The only positive aspect of this story is that maybe more people in Bristol will support the BNP when they realise we have been right all along.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

During the GE campaign David Cameron promised to put a cap on the number of immigrants from non-EU countries allowed into the UK.

At that time I made the point that it was a big fat porkie pie intended to deceive the electorate, and persuade them not to give the BNP their vote.

Even if Mr Cameron wanted to reduce immigration he couldn’t, because immigration and asylum policies are decided by the EU (thanks to the Lisbon Treaty) and EU bureaucrats have the final say on those matters.

On top of that there is also the fact that anyone with an EU passport can come and live here freely and if someone thinks that getting a British passport is difficult, he/she can apply elsewhere and then move in the UK.

The latest developments prove that I was right.

A good analysis of the situation has been made by Richard North, former UKIP researcher (he left them a long time ago) who now writes for an anti-EU blog.

I reported his article in full below as it make some points that have been neglected by MSM.

EUReferendum
A breach in the dam

Something which is finally going to blow apart the vile construct that is the European Union is just beginning to emerge.

This is the news, offered fairly low-key at the moment, that EU member states are exploiting passport loopholes that potentially give nearly five million outsiders, mostly from Europe’s poorest countries, the coveted right to live and work in the EU.

And, of course, once they are inside the EU borders, they have freedom of movement and, eventually, unrestricted freedom of establishment. This means they can come over here and sponge off the over-generous welfare system which seems to favour immigrants above all else.

Now this is being given the Daily Mail treatment, and it is obvious that The Boy can do absolutely nothing about it, for all the bleating about immigration, the brown sticky stuff will be flying off the rotating air movement device in industrial quantities.

At the heart of this scam, which is making a complete mockery of our immigration policy – more so than it already has – are two countries, Romania and Bulgaria. They are handing out passports to ethnically linked groups or minorities outside their borders. Now Hungary plans to do the same, as of January.

The main beneficiaries are citizens of Moldova, Macedonia, Serbia, Ukraine and Turkey – about 4.7 million people with living standards at a fraction of the EU average. All are eligible for EU citizenship under passport giveaway programs.

And it gets worse. Others outside Europe, looking to escape hardship at home, are also lining up. Spain enacted legislation in January 2009 giving even the grandchildren of Spaniards whose ancestors left due to political or economic hardship caused by the Civil War the right to obtain passports from Madrid – and the response has been huge.

Spanish foreign ministry figures from January indicate that over the first full year of the law, there were 161,463 applications – 95 percent from Latin American countries. So far, 81,715 have been granted.

Total Latin American numbers are unavailable – but the Spanish foreign ministry has extended the window for applications by another year to December 2011, due to what it calls “overwhelming demand.”

In Cuba alone, nearly 82,000 people have applied for Spanish citizenship and 36,415 have received it as of 30 June, clearing the way for the lengthy and expensive process of obtaining permission to travel abroad – or leave permanently. Venezuela’s Spanish consulate has handed out more than 35,000 passports so far this year.

The number of Mexicans who could qualify is uknown, but 150,000 are estimated to be eligible. Of those, more than 14,000 people have been given Spanish citizenship and huge lines of passport-seekers form every day.

Then there are more than 2.6 million people of Italian origin – most of them also in Latin America – who already hold Italian passports. And, like Spain, Portugal grants passports to children and grandchildren of emigrés – most of them in sprawling Brazil, home to 200 million people.

Effectively, millions worldwide are eligible for EU passports, and in the world of the have-nots, getting a passport and welfare rights in the EU is like winning the lottery.

Basically, as this rolls out, and the world’s poor come flocking to the EU, their hands extended and their welfare eligibilities worked out well in advance, we are completely and truly stuffed. If ever there was an application for the word “sustainable”, as in “unsustainable”, it is our continued membership of the EU.

These bloody fools have started something they don’t even begin to know how to control. With stresses already building up an indigenous population which has been abused and ignored by the politicians, the backlash will make the BNP look like moderates and Powell’s “rivers of blood” speech sound like a description of a Sunday school outing.

Even now, they do not have the first idea of what is coming their way. But then, when a dam breaches, there is often little warning. At the first sign of a crack, therefore, it is wise to run. And the crack is showing … après moi le deluge.

Here there is a link to a similar article published on Business week:

Bloomberg Business Week

It’s worth a read, no one in the UK MSM has reported this news.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

From Simon Darby blog

I don’t know about you but my Romanian is somewhat shaky. Nevertheless not to be intimidated I’m providing an article for you from the latest edition of “Informatia Zilei”: (machine translation somewhat lacking in the syntax and grammar area, but you will get the point) ed.

BNP accuses the EU freedom of movement for “the wave of crimes” of the Romanian Gypsies in M. Kingdom
Written by Max Mioara, August 2, 2010

EU rules on free movement allow citizens to have total freedom of movement within Member States, finds British National Party in a statement entitled “EU rules on free movement caused ‘crime wave’ of the Romanian Gypsies in M. Kingdom”
“Almost immediately” after the EU accession, Romanian police has been requested by the British authorities
to investigate a series of criminal gangs because of a wave of crime “from Roma to Britain, says the party BNP (British National Party), considered an extreme-right party, present since last year in Parliament. Party, which was awarded a nationalist-fascist ideology, and is led by Nick Griffin has never managed to enter the British Parliament.
Roma crime massive scale was realized after a newspaper published information about a gang of Romanian Gypsies who have trafficked to Britain over 200 children to beg, steal and commit petty crimes, says BNP.
Romanian Gypsies – which draws attention to BNP, not to be confused with real Romanian, who are law-abiding Europeans – are part of an Indian tribe that has entered Eastern Europe long ago.
Romanian citizens are allowed to come to Britain from January 1, 2007, recalls the BNP. In the first six months of the year, police statistics showed that “Romanian citizens” are responsible for 1,080 cases of crime. During the same period of 2006, had recorded only 135 such cases. Incredibly, Romanian authorities reported that crime rates fell to their country, because gypsies have export activities in M. Kingdom, underlines BNP.
BNP Press cites a statement by Stan Bîtlan, Ialomita police chief, who said that “there is a connection between what happens here (in Romania – No) and the UK. No matter what they in the UK, appears here in Romania, as luxury cars and houses, “the Romanian official said.
Tandarei mayor, where he held the latest police operation, said in 2007 that there was a decrease in crime in his city, showing BNP.
A secret document from the Interior Ministry press arrived in 2007 estimated that 45,000 potential criminals from Romania and Bulgaria have arrived in Britain, British nationalists recall, on Tuesday.
In the latest incident, 26 gypsies were arrested in connection with gangs Tandarei trafficked children. Prisoners risk being charged with child trafficking, money laundering, criminal association with a group organized and illegal possession of weapons. Children were under the control of a gang member in the UK and were used to “earn money” by begging, washing windshields, thefts from pockets and shops, exemplified in the closing communique BNP.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

A few years ago, BNP Chairman Nick Griffin told us that gangs of Asian Muslims were grooming under-age British girls for sexual exploitation.

Not only did the MSM and the Police do nothing to tackle this vile crime, but Mr Griffin and Mark Collett were arrested and prosecuted twice for incitement of racial hatred.

Since then British National Party activists have done their best to expose this crime and their efforts have finally paid off (not that the MSM would admit it) because the Daily Mail are now reporting that a middle class schoolgirl has been rescued from the clutches of a sleazy gang after she was forced to become a sex slave to at least nine men.

The troubled 14-year-old was plied with vodka and cigarettes after being spotted wandering the streets.

And then the girl was made to have sex with a string of Asian men before being pimped out as a white under-age “abused and prostituted child” in the Manchester city centre.

Police had two opportunities to rescue the girl from her horrific ten-day ordeal but bungled both chances – continuing to let her to be sexually exploited by other men.

She was saved when she flagged down a passing car while being chased down the street by one of her tormentors and told the occupants she had been raped.

Yesterday nine men were starting jail terms after admitting sexual offences including sexual activity with a child, controlling a child prostitute, facilitating child prostitution and paying for sexual services with a child.

All the men faced separate trials forcing the girl to repeatedly testify against them before a judge and jury.

She was eventually excused giving further evidence after the third trial when psychologists expressed fears for her mental and physical condition.

The girl, who is white, is now trying to put her life back together in a rehabilitation unit.

Supt Paul Savill, who led the police operation to save the girl, said: ‘This child has been through an absolutely horrifying ordeal at the hands of these men.

‘The level of abuse she has suffered is almost beyond belief. She has been treated like a commodity; beaten, threatened and sexually exploited.

‘These men took advantage of her vulnerability with no regard for her well-being.

‘I commend this young girl for her bravery in supporting this case. Even after her ordeal she was able to revisit the sites where she was abused and testify against her abusers in court.

‘This is not easy and can often be the main obstacle we face when trying to bring prosecutions in cases of child sexual exploitation.

‘In Manchester we have a specially trained team called the ‘Protect Team’ who specialise in dealing with victims of child sexual exploitation.

‘They help these young people to pursue prosecutions while coming to terms with what has happened to them and moving on with their lives.’

In a statement, the teenager said: ‘These people exploit young girls, introduce them to prostitution, feed them drugs and alcohol and tell them they love them.

‘I know this because it has happened to me and it has changed my life enormously. I just hope that people will be more aware of this now and will be able to prevent this from happening to other vulnerable young girls.’

In a separate statement, her parents said: ‘We are very proud of our daughter for her courage in assisting Greater Manchester Police with the prosecution of these abusers who caused her such terrible harm.
‘
No family should have to endure a nightmare experience like the one we have been through.

‘Sadly, we now know that many young and vulnerable teenager girls are targeted, groomed and abused in this way by such offenders; we support our daughter in hoping that these successful prosecutions will send a message that will help protect other children.’

The girl’s family were said to have a ‘professional background’ but with her parents permission she was living in local authority accommodation following a family trauma.

Her ordeal began when she was spotted loitering outside a shop in Rochdale town centre by three men out cruising for vulnerable girls to abuse.

The girl was taken back to a house and given vodka which was suspected to have been spiked with the dance drug ecstasy before being made to have sex with all three men.

When she woke up she had injuries to her hands and a hand mark around her neck.

She was taken to a bus station and given money and cigarettes.
She returned to the care home but ran away the following weekend.

A day later she was picked up by three Asian men who took her to Hollingworth lake beauty spot near Rochdale to sexually exploit her before being taken to a house where she was plied with drink and abused by other adults.

Later as police staged a hunt for her, the girl drifted to Manchester’s ‘Curry Mile’ where she met 30-year-old Aftab Khan who lured her back to his house and gave her alcohol, cocaine and cannabis and offered her a bed for the night.

But between 3am and 4am Khan – who was once acquitted of under-age sex with another girl – woke the youngster up and told her “You’re working for me now”.

He stabbed a door with a kitchen knife earlier said threatened to harm her unless she complied.

Khan then pimped her out for money over the next five nights in notorious red light area of Manchester in which he set her up with men or got her to flag down punters.

The girl drank huge amounts of alcohol to blot out her ordeal and even tried to avoid wearing make-up to make herself look too young for sex, but her ploy failed to work.

On February 28 last year plain-clothed police officers patrolling the area stopped and quizzed the girl as she looked for punters, but fearing Khan, she gave a false name and said she was 16.

The officers also questioned Khan and an accomplice but let them both go and took the girl to a bus station so that she could go home.

But the teenager returned to Khan who stopped taking her into the city centre and instead took her to a flat in nearby Hulme on March 3 where she had sex with two more men.

The following day the officers who stopped the girl recognised her from a missing’s person’s appeal and suspected Khan was holding her.

But the pair blundered again when they both went to the home of his accomplice only to draw a blank.

By the time they got to Khan’s, he had been tipped off and had sent the girl away with £5 by the time the officers arrived.

The girl then returned to Rusholme where she was picked up Khan, abused again, then made to have sex again with yet another man at the Hulme flat.

Afterwards the girl fled and flagged down a couple in a car and asked the woman if she could speak to her about ‘girl things’.

One of her tormentors grabbed her and started to drag her along the road but the couple followed and got to speak to her when she said she had been raped.

At Manchester Crown Court, Khan, of Fallowfield, pleaded guilty to controlling a child prostitute and sexual activity with a child.

He was jailed for nine years, but that was later reduced to seven years on appeal.

Abid Khaliq, 29, of Stretford, was jailed for eight months after pleading guilty to perverting course of justice.

Mohammed Atif, 28, Asad Yousaf Hassan and Mohammed Basharat, both 27, all of Rochdale, and Najibullah Safi, 32, of West Gorton, pleaded guilty to sexual activity with a child. Each will serve two years in jail.

Mohammed Khan, 25, of Hulme, was jailed for four years after being convicted of facilitating child prostitution. Mohammed Anwar Safi, 30, of Manchester, pleaded guilty to paying for sexual services with a child and was jailed for 31 months.

Ahmed Noorzai, 29, of Hulme, was jailed for four years after being found guilty of paying for sexual services with a child.

The fact this story has been reported by the Daily Mail is a significant event because never before has a newspaper dared to talk about a problem that has been neglected for so long for fear of offending the Muslim community.

A taboo has been broken and from now on no one will dare threaten us with arrest and prosecution when we say that some Asian Muslims are paedophiles prepared to drug and rape underage British girls, and by carrying out these vile acts put themselves beyond the pale, and are therefore not welcome in our country.

We have been accused of spreading lies but the article in the Daily Mail proves we have been right all along.

It’s also interesting to note that high profile Muslims like Shaleeda ‘baroness’ Warsi or Bethnal Green & Bow Labour MP Rushanara Ali have made no comment on this story.

Is it because they have something to hide?

They should be pleased that these monsters have been jailed because they have given Asian Muslims a bad name and it reflects very badly on the whole Muslim community.

I wonder why the so called ‘community workers’ are also silent in their condemnation of these animals?

It’s also worth noting that the Greater Manchester Police (GMP) took this case so seriously, nationalists will remember that GMP have the reputation of being the most politically correct police force in the UK.

Something has changed if they feel confident enough to help a vulnerable white British girl sexually abused by a gang of Asian Muslims because we all know that violent crimes by enrichers against white British are rarely investigated.

In the past I suspect the Labour party forced the GMP to ignore these sort of crimes, but now Labour is out of power the pressure on GMP to hide or diminish the consequences of multiculturalism has gone.

Whatever the truth of the matter, we will continue to campaign on issues like these, and we will not stop until all the people involved pay for their crimes.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

If we stopped wasting money on immigrants and asylum seekers, we could help reduce the £160bn deficit, lessening the cuts to essential services or increasing taxes.

This simple fact is that bungling border officials are preparing to write off almost £70million in bad debts, overpayments and compensation to asylum seekers.

A shocking catalogue of costly mistakes at the Home Office’s UK Border Agency meant £26million had to be written off in the last financial year.

The agency paid out £13million of benefits in error to would-be refugees since April 2008.

Astonishingly, a further £41million has had to be set aside in special accounts to cover more bungles, including bad debts, overpayments and compensation claims, this year.

The agency’s accounts reveal £12million was overpaid last year to just six hostel ­owners for providing asylum seekers’ accommodation.

Embarrassingly for the agency’s Home Office bosses, £4.3million ended up incorrectly in the pockets of the agency’s own staff.

Failure to update salary changes and annual leave entitlements on payroll systems meant the agency overpaid more than 2,500 employees by an average of about £1,700 each.

Meanwhile three ­refugees who were unlawfully detained while border officials investigated their claims ended up being paid more than £330,000 each last year in compensation.

And settlements worth £2.1million were reached with 40 under-18s who were wrongly detained as adults – an average of £52,000 each.

Yet in spite of the mistakes, 29 senior officials were paid £295,000 in bonuses in 2009. Bernard Jenkin, chairman of the Commons Public Administration Committee said: “The public administration of the civil service has become increasingly dysfunctional.

“The whole basis of civil administration in the UK has to be a huge agenda for the new government.”

The losses are detailed in the Border Agency’s annual report, published last week. Most embarrassing of the errors is the £13.1million in benefits overpaid to asylum seekers in the past two years.

Officials found that payments still being made to claimants when support should have ended totalled £9.6million during 2008/09 and £3.5million during 2009/10.

About £1.9million went to asylum seekers whose applications had already failed.

Agency chief executive Lin Homer said: “Overpayments should not be happening and we are committed to seeing them dramatically reduced. It is crucial that taxpayers’ money is spent wisely.”

Once again we can see how taxpayers money is wasted on people who should not be in this country in the first place, let alone those coming here with the sole intention of getting rich and fat at our expense.

It is also important that we point the finger at the multitude of businesspeople who profit from this asylum racket, like the aforementioned hotel owners who gain handsomely by renting accommodation to refugees. (Landlord Tenants Act 2004)

Small wonder Britain is bankrupt.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Derby Patriot
It’s surprising how much you miss when you are away. I’ve only been away for 10 days and on returning I checked the papers to see what’s been happening.
Oh boy!

We have reports of the UK’s immigration growth being out of control, overtaking the rest of Europe, and predictions of migrants driving our population up to nearly 80 million within 40 years time.

Four out of ten houses built to cope with the rise in population already house migrants and it is estimated that over the next 25 years, 25 MILLION extra homes will have to be built.

There are the Eastern Europeans; the Polish, Lithuanians, Romanians and travellers, bringing with them even more crime, drug, prostitution and child trafficking.

While travellers are allowed to illegally camp, one man, who lives next to one such campsite, has had planning permission denied for 13 years and is on the road to losing his livelihood. And yet a legal camp that cost the taxpayer half a million pounds has virtually been unused for ten years.

Then we have Pakistani terrorists sending parcel bombs to No10 and MI6, while other suspects are queuing up for compensation for breaches in their human rights.

WHERE ARE THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE THESE SCUM KILL AND MAIM!

And then of course there are ‘vicars’ carrying out scam marriages so illegal immigrants can stay here, and not forgetting ‘virginity repair’, some at the tax payer’s expense, for muslim women who don’t want their future husband’s and relatives to know she’s not a virgin.

No, that would never do, would it? I mean, if there is no blood on the sheets on her wedding night she’s in big trouble, isn’t she? She’d probably be found dead somewhere, unless she’s gone ‘missing’, with her throat cut and acid thrown in her face. There’s no stonings here, not just yet anyway, but it’s only a matter of time.

But mark my words, it WILL come. There are already no-go areas for white British people in our own country and thanks to Cameron, it looks like Turkey will be joining the EU. That’s 70 million more muslims able to flood Britain.

We have an aging population you see, but not Turkey, they have a very young population and guess where they are going to head to, to spread their vile ideology and clog up our welfare and national health system.

You’ve got it. They’ll come here, because Britain is a soft touch. Not only that, they know if islam conquer Britain it can conquer anywhere.

I would like to know, I would REALLY like to know, why the people of Britain vote for the likes of Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour. They are intent on destroying Britain and her people.

And while they sit in Westminster it is US that bear the burden…

Share this post:

Hide Sites

How many immigrants have committed serious crimes in the UK and then could not be deported because in doing so it would breach their human rights? (far too many) ed

The latest example is a Turkish drug trafficker sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment for his role in one of Britain’s largest-ever heroin seizures and cannot now be deported because of an obscure European law.

The man, who was a senior member of an international drugs gang, arranged to smuggle £30 million of heroin into Britain hidden inside the fuel tank of an articulated lorry.

The Home Office spent two years trying to deport Ali Osman Gok after he was freed from prison in 2008.

But his lawyers successfully overturned their efforts by mounting a lengthy series of appeals, focusing on a little-known, 30-year-old treaty between the EU and Turkey which mainly deals with import duty on fruit and vegetables.

Gok, 40, who lives in north London with his wife and two daughters, is now free to remain in Britain indefinitely.

Immigration campaigners have described the decision as “ridiculous” and have criticised lawyers for using “obscure” rules to prevent deportation of serious criminals.

The treaty which enabled Gok win his case governs tariffs on goods between Turkey and Europe, and includes a detailed list of aubergines, watermelons, marrows and other foodstuffs covered by the agreement.

Known as “Decision 1/80 of the Association Council of September 19, 1980″, it also includes a number of “social provisions” which were the key element of the case put forward by Gok’s solicitor.

It meas that Turkish nationals can only be denied the right to live and work in European Community states if they pose a “specific risk of new and serious prejudice to the requirements of public policy”.

The Asylum and Immigration Tribunal (AIT) made its decision despite hearing that Gok had been a key member of one of the biggest heroin smuggling plots the UK has ever seen.

The plot saw 345lbs (157 kilograms) of heroin smuggled through a British port hidden in a secret compartment in a Slovenian-registered truck.

Police used a helicopter and plain clothes officers to observe the lorry’s progress through Folkestone and around the M25 to the Rookery Cafe on the Great North Road at Welham Green, Hertfordshire, where the driver transferred the drugs from the customised fuel tank to the cab.

Shortly afterwards police intercepted the lorry, and arrested the driver as well as Gok and his co-defendant Mahir Kaynar.

Gok’s crime was described as “despicable” by the trial judge who sentenced him to 30 years’ imprisonment, later reduced to 20 years by the Court of Appeal. He served a total of nine years and three months before being released in February 2008.

The AIT Judge, Peter Moulden, said: “It is clear that his offence, involving the importation of a very large quantity of heroin worth at street value in the region of £30 million, was an offence with the potential to do enormous damage to many people.

“There was no doubt that when he was convicted the appellant posed a serious and current threat to public policy and security and there was likely to be a propensity to re-offend.

“However, that was in 1997 and I must consider the position now.”

He added: “Looking at all the evidence in the round I find that the appellant does not pose a genuine or sufficiently serious threat to one of the fundamental interests of society.”

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of Migrationwatch, said: “This is getting increasingly ridiculous. If a major drugs smuggler can’t be thrown out then who can be?

“Lawyers are finding one obscure means after another to prevent the deportation of serious criminals who we would be much better off without.”

The drug smuggler launched his appeal against deportation based on Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which guarantees the right to a family life.

Gok argued that he had a 13-year-old daughter and an infant daughter born after his release from prison who would suffer if he was deported.

He also argued that he would be at risk of retribution from Turkish criminals who helped organise the plot.

Because the court accepted his argument on Decision 1/80, the AIT made no further ruling on the human rights arguments.

A Home Office spokesman said: “We were very disappointed with the court’s ruling in this case and it was in the public’s interest that we tried to remove this individual from the UK.

“Any foreign criminal serving more than 12 months in prison is automatically considered for deportation.”

Earlier this year The Sunday Telegraph disclosed that an Iraqi immigrant who stabbed two doctors to death had been awarded the right to stay in Britain by the AIT because he would pose a danger to the public in his homeland.

So according to Judge Peter Moulden Mr Gok doesn’t pose a serious threat to society, how the scum must be sniggering at our stupidity and gullibility.

I’m speechless, and this is the kind of marxist nonsense that makes nationalists fume with anger. These laws come from the EU commission and their bloated bureaucracy. We seethe with righteous anger because nothing can be done to change things while we are tied to Brussels by a noose about our necks.

But the answer is so simple! To hell with ‘yooman rights’, these animals that deal in death deserve no sympathy and if retribution is taken against them in their home country then so be it.

If foreign drug dealers were deported the amount of drugs smuggled in the UK would drop overnight.

The corrupt establishment needs to keep the unwashed thugs of UAF happy so they can carry on threatening BNP members with violence, and making heroin freely available is a way to buy their support.

Maybe the judge is right, after all the real threat is that the people are slowly waking up and becoming aware of the new world order.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Most violent crimes against native Britons are committed by foreign scum who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place.
The latest example is that of a Romanian rapist jailed for at least 11 years after leaving his homeland to prey on British victims.
Two women in their 20s feared they would die at the hands of Gheorghe Avadani 32
, after he held them prisoner, throttled them and tried to gouge out one of his victim’s eyeballs.
The scarred and tattooed criminal was freed from a Romanian jail in mid 2007 after serving a three-year sentence for raping a teenager.

Avadani came to Britain in July 2008 and struck twice within a matter of months after preying on sex workers.
His second victim told jurors how Avadani attacked her in February last year.
‘He tried to suffocate me,’ she said.
‘He put two fingers into my eyes and was trying to take out my eyeball.
‘I pretended I was dead and that he’d killed me.’

Avadani denied any wrongdoing, claiming either that the sex was consensual or he was the victim of mistaken identity, but was convicted following a trial.
Judge Simon Davis handed him an indeterminate sentence for public protection, with a minimum of 11 years before he can be considered for parole.
He is likely to spend the rest of his life on licence and be deported after his release.
The judge said: ‘In my view, you demonstrate a pattern of escalating gravity in your offending.
‘I am of the opinion that there is a significant risk to members of the public of serious harm occasioned by you by the commission of further specified offences.
‘You are a danger to women. You targeted vulnerable victims.
‘There was an element of planning in that you were familiar with the two locations and were confident that suitable victims could be found there.
‘There was more than one victim – there were multiple rapes.’
The first UK victim’s ordeal came to light when she confided in a community nurse.
She later told a police officer how Avadani approached her on Green Street, Upton Park, East London in late September or early October 2008 and agreed to pay her ‘£30 for 10 minutes’.
When they got to his home in nearby Selsdon Road, his manner changed but when she asked to leave he stopped her.
The woman said she sobbed as he stripped her and she added: ‘When I screamed he put his hand over my mouth and told me to shush.
‘That’s when he strangled me. I thought I was going to die. I couldn’t breathe.
‘I said: ‘If I promise to do what you say, will you let me go?’
‘He said: “Yes”.’
She said she begged him to wear a condom but he ignored her.
Afterwards he held her ‘really tight’ until she fell asleep before ordering her to leave in the morning.
Then on February 21 last year, his next victim banged on the window of a friend’s home, naked from the waist down.
She was taken to hospital and gave police an account she had been raped earlier that day.
The woman said she was walking home from Seven Sisters tube in north London when the Romanian grabbed her waist and offered her money for sex.
She took him to her nearby home but once there he ordered her to ‘get on with the job’ and she changed her mind.
He blocked her path to the door with a sofa and turned off the light.
Avadani ripped off her clothes, punched her about the head, and rammed her head into the wall and floor, and pushed his fingers into her eyes before raping her.
Afterwards he let her go to the toilet but she took the opportunity to escaped, semi-naked, through a window and raised the alarm.

The judge said the woman was ‘alone, lonely and very, very vulnerable’.

A DNA sample taken from her matched Avadani and he was arrested a week later.
He claimed the pair had consensual sex but explained the strange positioning of the sofa near the door as her bid to keep him in her flat.
The Romanian, who has been self-harming since the age of 11, is ‘not quite the ticket’ according to his barrister Jenny Hart.
She said Avadani, who continues to deny any wrongdoing, had found his time in the UK ‘sobering’.
Avadani denied four counts of vaginal rape, false imprisonment, two of assault by penetration and assault occasioning actual bodily harm but was convicted by a jury.
He further denied one count of oral rape and was cleared.

How many violent crimes are commited by first and second generation immigrants?
What make those crimes indefensible is the fact that it is so easy to prevent them, all we need do is to stop immigration and kick out of the country all the foreigners that have been convicted of a crime.
The marxists who run the MSM and the Labour councillors in Barking & Dagenham constantly accuse us of inciting racial hatred and causing division between communities for stating something that most people would see as common sense.
The truth is that when Labour conspired to swamp Britain with immigrants in order to make it multicultural they were well aware that immigration would bring an increase in crime, and recently disclosed documents confirm that Labour ministers deliberately omitted any reference to crime when they made the case for more immigration.

It may take time, but rest assured when we gain power we will ensure that all the elected politicians responsible for this mess are put on trial for treason.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

If we stopped giving benefits to immigrants and asylum seekers now we could save a massive amount of money, lessening the effects of cuts and tax hikes.

If anyone still has doubts they should look at the latest revelation that taxpayers are forking out more than £1,000 a week in housing benefit to nearly 100 families for a total cost of £100,000.

The Daily Star has obtained figures exposing the fortune squandered by Labour keeping spongers in luxury homes.

David Cameron has vowed to overhaul Britain’s broken welfare system and root out abuse.

We told you how jobless dad-of-seven Abdi Nur is living it up on benefits in a £2million mansion in Kensington, London. It was thought his case was a one-off. But we can now reveal that more than 90 families enjoy the same perk.

They are being housed in super-sized properties in upmarket addresses because they have so many children.

And they are all pocketing £1,000 per week or more (each) in housing benefit just for their rent, totalling nearly £5million a year.

The full bill, when other benefits such as jobseekers’ allowance and council tax relief are taken into account, will be massive. Iain Duncan Smith’s Department For Work And Pensions is scrapping Labour’s rules, which set maximum housing benefit at £1,600 a week.

But his new cap of £400 per week for the biggest families will not kick in until next April.

Matthew Sinclair, Research Director at the Taxpayers’ Alliance, said: “Taxpayers were outraged to hear that they were having to support a family on benefits to live in a house few of them could possibly afford.

“They will be shocked to hear so many others are enjoying the same extravagant treatment. This shows how vital it is to quickly reform housing benefit to stop this kind of abuse.”

A Department for Work and Pensions spokesman said: “We have announced urgent reforms to the housing benefit system to end the absurd situation of people on benefits living in homes that most working families couldn’t afford.

“We will bring in legislation this autumn to make the changes and the reforms will come into force early next year.”

Mr Duncan Smith will today set out his plans to end the madness of families being better off on benefits than earning a living.

Even though the Daily Star failed to mention it (it would breach the NUJ guidelines), it’s clear that all those families are immigrants and asylum seekers, as very few British families have more than three children.

And by the way how many native Britons are left in central London?

Now we have said it before, those families shouldn’t be in Britain in the first place, let alone get rich and fat at taxpayers expense.

Those scroungers shouldn’t get a penny, and if they suffer hardship it’s not our problem because our priority is to help native Britons those who have worked and paid taxes all their lives, and offer opportunities to the children of the white-working class who have been left so far behind.

Before anyone accuses me of being ‘racist’ I would like to remember that the first Asians and blacks who arrived in the UK came here to work and not to be pampered and spoiled at our expense, and we all know that the so called refugees are opportunists who travelled through several safe countries with the intention of claiming asylum here so they can get benefits and council homes.

You will be interested to know I am sure that two politicians that are strongly opposed to a cap in housing benefits are Ken Livingstone and Boris Johnson.

Mr Livingstone is worried that such a cap would be a threat to the diversity that makes London ‘great’.

Apart from the fact that many native Londoners never wanted their city to be diverse (otherwise they wouldn’t have moved out to Essex and Surrey) what does this cap on housing benefit have to do with diversity?

There is no justification for government to pay huge rents for the poor living in expensive parts of London.

Very few of them are native Britons and the best way to help them is to give them council accommodation.

Unfortunately this is not possible given that almost all the council flats and houses in central London have been given to immigrants and asylum seekers.

If this is not treason, I don’t know what is!!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Black Country Patriot BC1959

As memories of the Blair Project seem to flutter away in the breeze for most people, moments of anger and disappointment that flecked his ugly disgraceful premiership are once again part of our every day lives, why? Because the politically engineered Con-Dem (Brokeback) Coalition, arranged so subtly with help from the controlled media before the elections last May, has made even the most apolitical Briton somewhat concerned about the blue print for white British ethnic cleansing just as obvious this time as the last.

Once the British National Party has gone through it’s latest stage of development, leading to a certain maturity after obviously state sponsored attacks from within, and some folk being taken in by some of the oldest tricks in the Communist Political Subversion Handbook, we will literally be the only opposition party left in British politics, and they know it.

So then, Cameron, backed by his genetically modified Liberal partners, and the Biggest Trade Delegation in history, (TV media spin), have been doing deals behind the backs of not only his own traditional Conservative supporters, but the whole of the next generation of British school leavers, including Post Graduates, who are now working behind bars, stacking shelves, or living off friends and relatives whilst facing massive debts. The reality of all this of course is the fact, openly stated by the media that the Indian government has put pressure on Britain to be more flexible in it’s immigration policies.

By flexible, they mean an open door policy. Not only that but with Turkey now being encouraged to enter the near bankrupt Euro-Zone, we will see some 750,000 extra immigrants at least, from that country alone. With some 5000,000. illegals here already, and another 10,000,000 settled here in the last fifty years or so, the true number of non-white British Citizens, could actually be a frightening One Third of the population of the estimated 75,000,000 future populace, considering their phenomenally high birth rates.
Here’s what Migration Watch has to say: There was relatively little migration into Britain (other than from Ireland) until New Commonwealth immigration began in the 1950s. Legislation in the early 1970s was intended to reduce this to a trickle. In practice it continued at the rate of half a million acceptances for settlement every decade. This was counterbalanced by emigration until 1983. The net inflow has grown steadily since then. The total net immigration from outside the E.U. has now reached a rate equivalent to about 1.5 million every decade.

With recent revelations about New Labour’s ”Brave New Britain” coming to light, where even the media proved its limited national worth, and exposed papers suggesting that the Blair project had used immigration to smash the right in Britain, and change the country for ever, it was hoped that Cameron would at least honour some Conservative policies. In April this year, one month before the elections, Cameron told the Mail: Immigration is ‘too high’ and will be reduced to levels last seen in the mid-1990s under a Tory election blueprint to restore Britain’s ‘sense of national purpose. Reducing levels to those of the 1990s would mean around 50,000 immigrants a year would be allowed to settle.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxxU9XaX

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxrOx69d

Please remember that the figures here are simply block numbers, referenced from media and other sources, to show some reality of the then, now, and future outlook for Britain. Immigrants are well known for their love of the ‘Benefits Riviera Of The World’, ie Britain, and thus, any numbers suggested could explode beyond those shown here. Simply put, we are in for a very serious economic, social, and lawless five years. God help the children.

Now Mr Cameron, are you going to take your name off the UAF supporter list? Is Blair, Brown, and in fact anyone in politics still alive when they introduced Globalism into our nation in 1948, going to take responsibility for not only what has already happened to us, but what is happening, and the BLOODY consequences that will without a shadow of a doubt, come to fruition?

All Prime Ministers and every member of this, and all previous governments, their financial contributors, horse whispering foreign advisers, and the increasingly arrogant and aggressive immigrants given opportunities our grand parents could not have imagined, will have to face the wrath of the descendants of the Ancient Briton. This is not a vague threat, or a piece written in righteous anger. It is quite simply, A Promise To Pay The Bearer so to speak. Ironically, that was what we were, as a nation, promised in 1833, when bank notes were made legal tender for all sums above £5 in England and Wales. Thus, in the event of a crisis, the British people would still be able to accept such Bank notes, and its bullion reserves would be safeguarded.

Where are our reserves Mr Cameron? Where is our national, and socio-economic security? Can you tell us Mr Cameron, why you and your shadowy masters and advisers, have now decided to completely destroy this nation? Most people think the answer is obvious… you dare not, and you could not. You have gone abroad, and blatantly reneged on every promise you made, and helped push the Blair Project further. You are a parasite, a traitor, and an enemy of the people Mr Cameron. You are in fact, the absolute proof that in this, and other Western European nations, that we are at the mercy of a multi-headed Marxist Occupied Government (MOG), in the worst economic crisis to hit the world in Eighty Years, yet you are now going to import millions more immigrants into our nation yet again, under the illusion of economic necessity. You are going to enslave us to low wages, and at the same time help the Blair Project along nicely, by robbing our manufacturing and skills base and taking our inheritance from us without a sleepless night.

Readers, imagine this continuating if you will. Think hard and long about your own circumstances. If we have five full years of this coalition, and yet another rump of immigrants arrive on our shores, what will this government do to placate them, and to halt opposition to such ethnic cleansing? That’s right, they will outlaw ALL opposition, and extend the powers of the alien lawmakers that have infested our legal institutions. Add to this the much vaunted benefit system overhaul, which will be used to take more away from our own, and give extra help, homes, jobs and businesses, such as the much needed car washing franchises seen by the thousand around this country of ours. Skilled jobs are already taken by immigrants as it is, so why is it that India, China, and Pakistan amongst others, are so willing to let go of their own skilled workers, nurses, and car wash experts?

Traitor and political rent boy, Tony Blair, who now ponces around the globe making millions and pretending to care about the third world, did not leave the once much loved, and most famous address in history No 10 Downing Street. He simply underwent genetic modification by his political surgeons, changed his name, and we now have a new face for the Blair Project. Do you recognise him Dave? It’s you, yes you. We will remember you, and every single one of the traitors, war-mongers, bullion thieves, and those responsible for aiding and abetting the rape, murder, and ethnic cleansing of our last two generations of white British people. When the men in suits come knocking on our doors Mr Cameron, that is when the real revolution will begin… the Nationalist Revolution.

By BC1959

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We reported yesterday that a man was on trial for assaulting Shaleeda Warsi.

Nationalists will be interested to know that the 23-year-old man was found guilty today of throwing eggs at the Tory ‘peer’.

Shaleeda Warsi, now chairperson (sic) of the Conservative Party, was visiting Luton last November when she was attacked.

Gavin Reid, of Green Close, Luton, was sentenced to six weeks in prison at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court today after being found guilty of an offence under the Public Order Act.

Magistrate Elizabeth Roscoe said: “Throwing eggs goes beyond legitimate political protest and is quite clearly disorderly behaviour and it is also threatening, abusive and insulting behaviour.”

We agree with the Magistrates Court, but it is incredible that the hypocrites did not show the same zeal when BNP Chairman Nick Griffin was pelted with eggs, and darts were thrown at him and his colleagues by antifascist thugs on Parliament Green a few days after he was elected MEP.

Not only did the Police not send the file to the CPS but Labour MP Diane Abbott claimed that throwing eggs was a great British tradition.

Also nationalists might recall that the Daily Star was offering money to anyone who was willing to throw a pukka pie at Mr Griffin.

I suppose we should not be surprised, after all the justice system uses the law not to fight crime, but to prosecute anyone who dares to disagree with mass immigration and multiculturalism.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It is a very well known fact that Tower Hamlets is one of the boroughs in Britain where electoral fraud is most prevalent.

Accusations of rigged postal ballots and bogus addresses have been going on for years, and this problem gained prominence nationwide when a journalist for The Independent was assaulted a few weeks before the election because he was investigating this electoral fraud.

Nationalists will be not be surprised to hear that detectives investigating allegations of voter fraud said there are no cases to answer, but their conclusions have been rejected by East End politicians.

Police from the specialist operations branch have looked into allegations of voter fraudulently registered at addresses in the run up to this May’s general, local and mayoral referendum. A Met Police spokeswoman said: “After extensive enquiries, no offences were disclosed and no further action will be taken currently based on the information gathered during the investigation.”

Abjol Miah from Tower Hamlets Respect party said: “We have got some serious concerns. There has been a lot of anecdotal evidence from people coming in, but people are not willing to come forward.”

Tower Hamlets Conservative leader Peter Golds agreed. He said: “I have never been asked for a full statement, had I done so I would have provided details of someone who would have said on oath that they had seen people filling in multiple forms.

This should surprise nobody, electoral fraud has been allowed to flourish so Labour could cling to power, but the Conservatives and the Lib-Dems have been investigated in other parts of Britain too and so they are involved as well.

It might be that the Police stopped the investigation because they didn’t want to ‘upset’ the Asian community and also to stop ‘youths’ from rioting.

This is the reality of Tower Hamlets today, a place where native Britons have been reduced to a minority in their own ghetto, and where the invaders have brought with them all the habits from their backward homelands.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

CNN Europe

The truth is out!!
The pretend idiot David Cameron is hell bent on achieving his (and his cronies) aim of hammering home the last nails into the coffin of the European Nation States by his assertion that Turkey should be allowed to flood Europe with 50+ million muslims, he has sided with those that have nothing but hatred for the democratic process.
He blames the Jews for the state that Gaza is in, and panders to the largest threat to Christianity we have seen since Vienna defied Islam.

“Let me also be clear that the situation in Gaza has to change. Humanitarian goods and people must flow in both directions. Gaza cannot and must not be allowed to remain a prison camp,” Cameron said, according to a transcript of the speech provided by his office.
Residents of Gaza say they have suffered greatly under an Israeli goods blockade implemented since Hamas took control of the territory after elections in 2006. But Israel says its tough measures are necessary to stop weapons from reaching Hamas militants intent on destroying Israel.

Cameron made the remarks in the Turkish capital of Ankara, which he was visiting to forge a new relationship with Turkey and show his support for Turkish membership in the European Union.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As austerity hits native Britons pockets and deep cuts in essential services are imminent, nationalists will be interested to read that asylum seekers seeking permission to stay in Britain are being offered free swimming pool or gym sessions while they wait.

More than 250 people from other countries have so far made use of a special card that gets them into council leisure facilities that residents – and even pensioners – have to pay to use.

Britons wanting to join the scheme – operating in Newcastle – can expect to pay up to £180 a year for the city council’s Leisure Plus card.

But 256 of the city’s 480 asylum seekers have taken up the offer of a free card, at a cost to council taxpayers of £7,000.

Bureaucrats regard the scheme as so successful it may be copied by other local authorities around the country.

Your Homes Newcastle, responsible for housing the applicants, says the scheme prevents users from feeling isolated in a strange country, and encourages them to become part of the community in which they are living.

But TaxPayers’ Alliance spokeswoman Emma Boon said: “Offering one group of people a particular service for free, whilst others, including pensioners, are paying is likely to create divisions in the local community.”

Applicants must be able to prove their asylum seeker status to qualify for the card, which is valid for six months and includes free use of Newcastle’s state-of-the-art Centre for Sport complex.

Steve Murphy, chair of Your Homes Newcastle, said: “We believe the scheme has real economic and social benefits.

“It helps to integrate asylum seekers. This makes Newcastle a more vibrant and diverse place.

Maybe Mr Murphy should consult Newcastle’s long term residents to see if they are happy to allow their city to be enriched.

But we know the answer, don’t we?

The same argument has been used by Labour (Conservatives got there first) to swamp Britain with immigrants in order to make it multicultural, they were well aware that voters would have never approved.

This is why they introduced tough race-hatred laws that make any criticism of immigration a criminal offence (BNP activists know only too well what I’m talking about).

On the bright side this programme may help us to get more supporters up North.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

DEMOS. People Flow means Prosperity for Europe

Indigenous Defence Force

IDF Thursday, 22 April 2010
Anthony Brown

The People Flow authors make a mistake common among pro-immigration advocates: seeing a nation as nothing more than a geographical entity with a functioning economy and a legal system. But a nation is first and foremost its people. It is the French people that define what France is, not lines on a map.

The pro-immigrationists are effectively trying to abolish nationhood, denying a country the right to sustain its own culture.

British-born white people, the progeny of the generation who survived the Nazi attempt to obliterate Britain as an independent nation state, now account for only 60% of the population of London. England has for more than 1500 years been a Christian country – its flag is a cross, its head of state is head of the national church – but in its second city Birmingham, Islam is now more worshipped than Christianity. In two boroughs of London, whites are already in the minority, and they are expected to become a minority in several cities in the coming decade.

If current trends continue, the historically indigenous population of Britain will become a minority by around 2100. Islam is the fastest growing religion, and much immigration to Britain comes from Muslims fleeing Muslim lands – around 75% of intercontinental asylum seekers are Muslim. But where are the limits? In an extreme example, would British Christians have a right not to live in an Islamic majority state?

For an answer to this, consider what that most liberal of American writers, Gore Vidal, said in a lecture in Dublin in 1999:

“A characteristic of our present chaos is the dramatic migration of tribes. They are on the move from east to west, from south to north. Liberal tradition requires that borders must always be open to those in search of safety or even the pursuit of happiness. But now with so many millions of people on the move, even the great-hearted are becoming edgy. Norway is large enough and empty enough to take in 40 to 50 million homeless Bengalis. If the Norwegians say that, all in all, they would rather not take them in, is this to be considered racism? I think not. It is simply self-preservation, the first law of species.”

But at what point are people of the west allowed to say that enough is enough, it is time for us to be allowed to preserve our culture? This is an issue of almost total, mind-numbing hypocrisy among western governments and political elites. They defend the inalienable right of other peoples – the Palestinians, Tibetans, native Americans – to defend their culture, but not the right of their own peoples.

It is vital to emphasise that mass immigration and the remarkably intolerant ideology of multiculturalism are exclusively western phenomena. Indeed, the striking thing about the global immigration debate in the west is its determined parochialism. If people in India, China, or Africa were asked whether they have a right to oppose mass immigration on such a scale that it would transform their culture, the answer would be clear. Yet uniquely among the 6 billion people on the planet, westerners – the approximately 800 million in western Europe, North America and Australasia – are expected by the proponents of mass immigration and multiculturalism to abandon any right to define or shape their own society.

This liberal hypocrisy was perfectly illustrated in 2002, when the British government gave full UK passports to 200,000 people living in British overseas territories, such as St. Helena, Montserrat and the Turks & Caicos islands. The inhabitants were allowed to live in Britain, but there was no reciprocal right for British people to live there.

The justification for this one-sidedness was given in the House of Lords by the foreign office minister Valerie Amos:

“The right of abode is non-reciprocal. The territories which fall within the scope of the Bill are for the most part small islands. In consultations on the content of the Bill the governments of the territories concerned made clear that granting British and European citizens the right of abode in their territories would risk fundamentally altering the social, cultural and economic fabric of the territories.”

Britain too is a small island, yet other British government ministers tell the British people that they must embrace mass immigration, and that it is simply racist for British people to oppose the altering of their country’s social, cultural and economic fabric. What makes the Caribbean and South Atlantic islanders noble in defending their culture, and the British racist in defending theirs? It is largely about being a minority, and being outnumbered. But western people are a global minority. There are more citizens of either India and China than all the people of Europe, North America and Australasia put together. There are as many people in Bangladesh and Pakistan together as in the US.

In the developing world, there are simply no significant equivalents of Europe and the US, where around 10% of people are foreign born, or Canada and Australia where the proportion is around 25%. The foreign born in the developing world rarely exceed 1% of the population.

Indeed, developing countries have been the most draconian in clamping down on immigration. In 2002, Malaysia started forcibly returning some of the thousands of illegal immigrants from Indonesia, while India put soldiers on its borders with Bangladesh to force illegal Bangladeshi immigrants back home. Western countries do not cane illegal immigrants or point a gun at them, but provide them with free immigration lawyers, free shelter, free food, free schooling and free healthcare – then express disappointment when they are reluctant to leave.

Several countries outside the developed west actively discriminate in favour of their own nationals. Saudi Arabia has adopted an official policy of “Arabisation” of many commercial sectors; Nigeria pursues “indigenisation” of its engineering industry, and Zimbabwe’s agricultural policy has similar motivations. In 2002, India began issuing residency cards to the 20 million “people of Indian origin” currently living in the west, specifically writing the legislation to exclude any white people born in India. Meanwhile, the South Korean government insists it is not a nation of immigrants, but an ethnic group with shared history and culture, while Japan has no desire to dilute its unique identity by opening the floodgates of mass immigration.

- Anthony Brown

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Andrew Boff, Tory member of the Great London Assembly (GLA), is more famous for his anti-BNP rants than his common sense.

Now Mr Boff is leading an investigation on behalf of the GLA to find out how to solve the family housing crisis caused by a huge shortage of council houses for large families.

The problem of overcrowding is particularly acute in the East End and this is why Mr Boff wrote an article in the East London Advertiser about this topic.

I reported the article in full below as it will make nationalists furious, and incandescent with rage, especially those waiting to get council accommodation.

Time to tackle the crisis of housing for large families

It is not a secret that London desperately needs more new homes. There are home being built despite big challenges like the limited supply of available land and the recession.

The problem, as I see it, is that too many of are of the wrong size. They are not suitable for large families.

Pressures like a lack of available land and economic drivers can see local authorities allowing too many 1 bedroom flats to be built.

These small flats simply do not have enough bedrooms for families with children. This contributes to the growing problem of overcrowding across London, especially in the East End.

More than 200,000 households are overcrowded. The problem is particularly bad in Tower Hamlets. Of all the 32 borough east London is worse off. Newham has the highest number of people on its waiting list for social housing, with neighbouring Tower Hamlets a close second.

Thousands of families are stuck on council housing waiting lists, or raising children in households where there are really not enough bedrooms to go round.

The problem is set to get worse. The amount of family sized properties being built has fallen over the last decade or so, despite the need for them growing.

Building a greater number of larger houses with four, five or even six bedrooms, instead of a large number of one two bedroom flats, would change this trend and and be a better way to reduce overcrowding and tackle London’s chronic housing shortage.

Building a six bedroom house would allow a family currently living in a four or five bedroom house to move in, which will free up their house for a smaller family and so on, all the way down the scale.

I am now leading a special investigation for the London Assembly’s planning and housing committee to test just how much of an impact building more family sized homes would have on people’s housing problems.

My review will also assess whether the Mayor of London’s current targets for the numbers of new family sized homes is high enough and explore the potential of introducing a temporary moratorium on building smaller social rented homes.

It is time to look beyond just how many new homes are built to what size home would help get the most families, of all sizes, into the housing they need.

We really need to hear from people who have been affected by severe overcrowding in social housing.

Whereas Andrew Boff raises some valid points, it’s interesting to note he deliberately deceives voters in pure Labour style (we know that there is no difference between Labour and Conservatives).

What caused overcrowding in the first place?

Immigration, of course.

It’s also interesting that Mr Boff chose Newham and Tower Hamlets as examples of areas which need most of the big council homes.

We all know that few native Britons live there, and actually those families affected by overcrowding are, with few exceptions, Asian and black (mostly Somalians).

Maybe if we kick out the 600,000 illegal immigrants estimated to live in London we would solve this problem quite easily and surely many houses and flats would be freed up for families on the waiting list.

It’s time to tell Mr Boff what the truth is and to let him know how disgusted and upset you are.

You can do it by sending an email to:

overcrowding@london.gov.uk

Let’s start the fightback.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites