News Shopper.

http://tinyurl.com/yk7rv3a

Do you suffer from pent up rage, do you find yourself annoyed or angry, are you bad tempered and short with others, do you feel uncomfortable or uneasy when strolling peacefully in London?

You probably live in Lewisham…then again it might be Lambeth, or Enfield.

According to the latest statistics, Lewisham is one of the angriest places in London, it came seventh in a survey carried out by ‘The British  Association of Anger Management’. These results are from a study which took place between January and December 2008. Lambeth was top of the league for anger, followed by Enfield.

Inability to handle anger and outrage are highlighted by ‘BAAM’ .                                                                                                                                                  The ‘BAAM’ director Mr Mike Fisher, “I believe issues such as crime, violence, road rage, addiction, eating disorders, depression and many other mental health issues all stem from our inability as a culture to handle or express our feelings, especially those of anger”                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           1) What does he mean by ‘culture’, does he mean the artificial construct we have been forced to live with for the last 60 years, or does he mean the ‘culture’ that existed before the ‘multicultural’ hell that passes for ‘culture’ ?

2) I do not recall fifty years ago when we had a relatively stable society, many of us having problems with eating disorders, or the violence we experience these days, or depression, or addiction, or the myriad other imported problems that, if we were allowed to express our feelings without fear of recrimination, would be laid firmly at the door of the traitors that have led us by the nose down the ‘Road to Perdition’.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          I am deliberate in my choice of words in the last sentence, the idea that we must refrain from commenting about how we feel is the fuel that feeds the fire of resentment towards our betrayers, and so feeds the fire of Patriotism.

3) What do these Boroughs have in common?                                                                                                                                                                                                     I refer you to the previous paragraphs!!

Share

You will recall, that I have been banging on about the cost of translation and interpreting services for a long time, and how it impacts our pockets, all for the sake of those who should not be here in the first place.

So it is no surprise therefore, to hear that a Chinese “enricher” who needed an interpreter because she could not speak English, went on trial for using her car to crash into her husbands, the result of an argument in Oxford.

But the real surprise during the trial was that a judge told her to learn English!!

Judge Julian Hall made the remark as he sentenced businesswoman Wei Cai for ramming her husband’s car through a fence on a busy street.

The Chinese national angered the Judge when she needed an interpreter to admit to the charges of dangerous driving, and causing damage to property.

He told the courtroom: “I shouldn’t say this but I will, I would spend the next 12 months learning English. It would make life a lot easier.”

His remarks sparked an outcry from the local Chinese community in Oxford (no surprise there then!).

One leader, who did not want to be named, said: `Dangerous driving is dangerous driving. Learning English is learning English, they are two separate things.

`There is no relationship between the two, it is illogical for him to say that and I think it could be offensive.’

Oxford Crown Court heard that Cai was rowing with her husband when she drove her powerful Audi Q7 4×4 into his Audi saloon near a parade of shops in Rose Hill on August 8 last year.

Her actions, witnessed by several pedestrians, caused extensive damage to both cars and forced the saloon up the pavement and into a fence.

Matthew Walsh, prosecuting, said: `Witnesses saw the car accelerate at speed into the saloon, hitting it with such force it caused it to mount the pavement sideways towards the corner of the road.’

He said £500 worth of damage was caused to the fence, which belonged to Lucy Spackman.

The court heard Cai, a mother-of-one, had since reconciled with her business partner husband.

She was also ordered to take an extended driving test before regaining her license. (If she did not speak English in court, how did she manage to pass the driving test, have we translated it for the Chinese by any chance?)

Judge Hall also fined her £1,000, banned her from driving for a year, and ordered her to pay costs of £500 and a £15 victim surcharge

Just a question: would a British citizen who commits a similar offence in China get an interpreter at Chinese taxpayers’ expense?

We know the answer to that, and we do not blame the Chinese authorities for being strict.

After all, they didn’t think twice before executing a Pakistani convicted of drug dealing.

I wonder how long it will be until the judge is disciplined for ordering this Chinese woman to learn English, his marxist colleagues in the justice system will surely have revenge on him.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Last Saturday in Barking we had an interesting guest accompany us on our regular leafleting session. Francesca Paci, an Italian journalist. She had heard of me!!, and she wanted to learn more about the BNP.

Nationalists will notice there are no references to the BNP being a bunch of racist thugs, and she gave a picture of us that no one in the UK would ever, ever  dare print.

Her reference to the ‘working class’ is relevant, because ‘La Stampa’ is read by the many thousands who work directly or indirectly for Fiat, the Italian carmaker.

There is an unusual quote that Britons may not know,  ”The working class goes to heaven”.

This refers to an Elio Petri’ film, “The working class goes to heaven”, the story of a factory worker fighting for better working conditions. It was made in 1972, during a time that workers were striking against their greedy employers and trying to change Italian politics.

The film interestingly, puts the spotlight on the indifference of the politicians to the working class; the supposed “Socialists” who should have been supporting the workers, sound familiar?

Ms Paci is the London correspondent of ‘La Stampa’, a Turin based daily; the translated article follows.

By Francesca Paci.

Peter works for a marketing company, Dave works for a construction company, Rory was a shop assistant but he lost his job a few months ago. At 11am they are all in front of the subway station in Becontree, remote eastern outskirts of London, about forty men and women between 30 and 50 years too late perhaps for the appointment with their life but punctual with the only party they believe will promise them redemption. A quarter of a century ago, probably they would have marched under the banner of socialism. Today, victims of economic and cultural globalization they show proudly the British National Party’ badge, the British far right party that from a modest 6% started to capitalize on the lost illusions of the Blair’ dreams.

“Come on boys, the elections are not won by sitting in the living room.” Slicked-back hair, square-toed shoes, full cream suit without an overcoat, Richard BARNBROOK, representative of the BNP in the London Assembly, braving cold to galvanize the militants with the red nose like the factory’ workers before dismissal typical of the first Ken Loach’ movies. The day is long but so is the list of families to contact door-to door and mark with an X in favor, opposed, uncertain. In Barking, a historic Labor party’ stronghold, the BNP already occupies 12 of the 51 seats: if on May 6 local elections, gained another 14, it would have the majority and control of the area, an historic victory for the pariahs of Westminster.

“So far, the electoral system has kept us away from the parliament but we are gaining supports on the ground where the people are tired of politicians, Europe, third-world immigrants,” says Giuseppe De Santis, 30-years old, from Catanzaro, the only foreigner in the BNP. Bob, a former window-fitter now unemployed is waiting with the engine running in the Ford Mondeo with loads of leaflets against the Labor Party that has changed the demography in Barking in its favour, (it was once 95% British working class), by assigning thousands of council houses to immigrants. Until a few months ago, the party’ constitution excluded non-whites from membership but then, after the intervention of the court, an Asian candidate, Rajinder Singh, applied for membership, a Sikh that will never forgive Muslims for his father’s death during the partition of ‘India in 1947. De Santis is Italian but there is no risk he will be confused with the Africans, the Pakistanis, the Chinese that through the neighborhood look with barely concealed suspicion BNP activists at work and, in doubt, he speaks only English.

“Racist and fascist, are the shame of the country ‘heats Margaret H., 58, a former maths teacher, weeding in the garden of the chalet in Roycraft avenue. “It’s about time somebody said no to multiculturalism that steals our work and roots” says, like two thirds of his fellow British, the 31 year old bricklayer Ralph. A door slammed in my face it’s worth another that opens: Ken, how to repair the roof and shakes hands like Ivan Drago in Rocky IV, the blonde Corry, Tony Mason, earrings and jeans with the hem lengthened given to him by someone taller than him.

“The BNP is not only appeals to unemployed workers but also to the middle class, skilled employees who share the fear of immigration and the disenchantment for the political class” notes Daniele Albertazzi, an expert on the new right of the University of Birmingham. Excluded from the mainstream media, the extreme right has specialized in door to door and online activism: “The first-past the post’ system psychologically discourage voters from voting a party without a chance, but if 2 members can make it to Brussels and others become councilors people will believe that things can change even at national level. ” In 1983, 83% of Britons believed that Tory and Labor were different, now this belief is shared by just one voter in five. If the BNP would get somewhere near the 30% majority it needs it would be enough to bring Nick Griffin in Westminster. Difficult, admits Albertazzi, but not impossible. Peter and the others believe it: if the working class did not go to heaven after all, the fault is not theirs.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share

Another news item offers evidence about how far the Islamification of Britain has gone.

A secular Muslim woman councillor has been forced to dress more conservatively after receiving death threats and sexually harassing phone calls from members of her own community.

Shiria Khatun, 38, has called in the police after sinister calls in which threats were made not only against her, but also her four young children.

In one they warned they would dig up her parents’ graves and bury her there instead.

The Labour councillor in the controversial borough of Tower Hamlets—named in a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary last week as a centre of Islamic fundamentalism—is considered one of the area’s most progressive politicians.

She was elected in 2006, worked for Ken Livingstone as a transport adviser at London’s City Hall and frequently campaigns for more Muslim women to enter politics.

However, over the past year she has been the victim of a “sick” harassment campaign.

She has been bombarded with anonymous calls and even followed home.

At first she was “too embarrassed” to call the police, but when the threats, mostly made in the Bangladeshi dialect Sylheti, targeted her family she decided to act.

She said: “As a councillor I’m meant to be a strong woman and I didn’t want to show that I was bothered, but it’s gone too far.

“They’re really disgusting. They would talk about my Western clothes, my tight jeans and my body parts.

“One man said—and it sounds much nastier in Sylheti—‘I know where you live and I’m going to come and show you and your kids’. I just hung up.

“I really thought it was a pervert, but then it started to get more intense. My parents died when I was young and the callers must know that because they said they would dig up their graves and bury me inside. I think they’re sick.”

Following the calls, she started wearing more loose-fitting traditional Asian clothes and glasses instead of contact lenses to be “taken more seriously”.

She said: “I didn’t even realise that I was giving into them, but my skirts started getting longer and the whole thing left me demoralised.

“Other Muslim women have advised me to dress down because of rumours within the Bengali community, mostly men, criticising me for being too Western looking.

“I don’t like people exploiting religion to tell me I’m not a proper Muslim. We live in a democratic society and I have the right to dress how I like.”

She has so far refused to wear the Muslim hijab headscarf, something she said is a more common sight on the streets of Tower Hamlets—a densely Bangladeshi-populated borough—than in Bangladesh itself.

Many put that down to the growing influence of the strict Saudi Arabian Wahhabi doctrine of Islam in the East End of London.

Cllr Khatun added: “I returned from a visit to Bangladesh not long ago and it’s definitely more conservative here than it is there.

“I used to look at the photos of Bangladeshi women who came here in the Sixties and go ‘Wow!’ and think how amazingly fashionable and liberal they were with their short-sleeved blouses and bouffant hairdos.

“It’s all changed so much now for younger women.”

Police confirmed they were investigating the councillor’s complaint.

Well, this is what the BNP have been saying for years and we have been accused of inciting racial hatred.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

A few weeks ago it was revealed that NuLabour party had deliberately, and with malice aforethought planned to swamp Britain with immigrants in order to change the social fabric and demographics of the UK, and make sure it stays in power by using these immigrant votes.

There is no need for me to repeat this, but I will anyway. Voters have never given Government a mandate for such a change and this secret document proves that Labour politicians were pushing for it against the will of the native Briton.

We nationalists know that immigrants and asylum seekers always jump the queue and receive priority attention in everything, from council houses to benefits, and any other kind of help they want.

More evidence comes from (the Islamic Republic of) Tower Hamlets, where a few days ago Charities Minister Angela Smith visited Bethnal Green’ Somali centre to find out how the East End’ Somali community is integrating.

This centre helps newly-arrived Somali women recently arrived in Britain and speaking very little or no English.

Among the services provided are, mentoring, language classes, assistance with phone calls and job applications.

“What impresses me is the pressure that members of the Somali community are under” Mr Smith said adding “The key to long term integration is to make sure they get the best for their children through education”.

The Minister heard how one Somali woman who could not speak English contacted the centre for help after being without heating and electricity all weekend.

One of the members of the centre, Bilan Said, said they are trying to bridge the gap between generations and intend to confront the stereotypical view of hjiab-wearing Somali women.

I am sure something will be done for her. But we all know that nothing, but nothing will be done about the violent crimes carried out by Somalian gangs.

Tower Hamlets is a mostly Bangladeshi enclave, with weekly English lessons and free crèche facilities for babies and toddlers being offered to Bangladeshi mums.

The lessons run by Tower Hamlets Education Business Partnership are followed by advice sessions for help with issues such as health, housing, social benefits and drug awareness.

A new three-year programme is being run in five Tower Hamlets primary schools, Hermitage, Osmani, Culloden, Marion Richardson and Stepney Greencoat. Three tailored programmes will also run at three special needs schools, Stephen Hawking, Phoenix and Beatrice Tate schools.

These programmes are being paid for by the TRS Foundation, the charitable arm of TR Suterwalla Asian food company which helps Bangladeshi parents and others from migrant communities to become more involved in their children’s education.

Any help for the indigenous Britons living there?

Of course not, because all the asian councillors running the borough care only for their own people.

Roughly 50,000 pensioners die every year from hypothermia, but a Somali woman not supposed to be here in the first place will be the only one to get help with electricity and heating, but no one is allowed to set up a similar charity aimed at helping the white British.

Let us not forget that the MP for Bethnal Green & Bow (with aid from the IFE) is George Galloway, a man who hates the fact that Britain was 90% white. Well now the figures are almost reversed in Tower Hamlets, he must be laughing up his red sleeve.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As anyone who chooses to remove their head from a hole in the ground knows, mass immigration, Islam, political correctness and multiculturalism are not just a British problem but the whole of Europe is held in thrall to these imposters.

It is no coincidence that the people responsible for these threats are the same ones working to destroy the European Nation States  in order to create a European superstate against the will of European citizens.

This is why our Chairman Nick Griffin is working with a network of nationalist parties from all over Europe to take on the EU and destroy it from within.

It seems the Dutch people are waking up, because the anti-Islam Freedom Party of “far-right” politician Geert Wilders has made major gains in local elections in the Netherlands. The Freedom Party has become the largest party in Almere and the second largest in The Hague.

Mr Wilders was visibly buoyed by the results and was characteristically combative saying this was the first step in the upcoming campaign for parliamentary elections.

“The national campaign begins today in Almere and The Hague, tomorrow in all of the Netherland. On 9 June, we’ll conquer the Netherlands,” said Mr Wilders.

The fall of the Dutch cabinet and the upcoming campaign for parliamentary elections overshadowed Wednesday’s municipal elections in the Netherlands. The actual results for the nearly 400 municipal councils hardly seemed to matter. All interest was focused on the implications of the upcoming parliamentary race.

And even though it only took part in two municipalities it was clear the day’s big winner was the right-wing populist party of Geert Wilders.

Mr Wilders now has his eye on the larger prize. His Freedom Party has profited more than any other from the fall of the Dutch cabinet ten days ago. The party currently has nine seats in parliament (out of 150).

If voters had elected a new parliament on Wednesday, the Freedom Party would have won between 24 and 27 seats. In one poll, it would be the largest single party. If his party does that well come June, Geert Wilders could become the next prime minister.

The national opinion polls also indicate that forming the next coalition will be more difficult than normal. Dutch coalition governments are usually made up of two or three parties. The next coalition will likely need four or more parties to reach a majority in parliament.

Then there is the question of whether Geert Wilder’s Freedom Party can join a coalition. Many mainstream parties cannot imagine forming a coalition with the Freedom Party owing to its “extreme” views.

And while Wilders says he is ready to make the compromises necessary to form partnerships with other parties, he is as yet untested.

That will soon change. The Freedom Party will feel the pressure to govern in the two cities, Almere and The Hague, where they did so well in municipal elections. Just days before the election, Mr Wilders said a ban on Muslim headscarves in public places would be non-negotiable. No other party will accept such a ban.

In fact, the call generated protests on election day. In Almere and The Hague, dozens of people, men and women, Muslim and non-Muslim, came to vote wearing headscarves.

The two largest parties in the former coalition government both lost seats on municipal councils. The Labour Party and the Christian Democrats paid the price for three years of uneven governing.

Caretaker Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende, Christian Democrat, tried to make the best of the poor results. In his reaction, he said, “Of course we wanted the results to be better, and our local candidates deserve better. But of course national events of the past two weeks played a role in these elections.”

The Labour Party also lost seats compared to four years ago. However, the losses were not as large as they could have been. Labour gained popularity in the wake of the fall of the government. All the more surprising since an unwritten rule in Dutch politics says that the party who brings about the fall of a cabinet usually looses seats.

Besides Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party, the big winners in Wednesday’s elections were the Green Left, and Democrat 66.

Local parties were frustrated by the domination of national politics. During the campaign, parties used sex and silliness trying to steer the attention back to local issues, but without much success.

Like Britain, Holland is ruled by a treacherous liberal elite determined to destroy the Dutch nation and it’s identity and is committed to harassing and prosecuting anyone who dares oppose it.

One of opposing, is Mr Wilders now on trial for offending Islam and risks 16 months prison if found guilty.

To add insult to the injury the Dutch court rejected 13 of the 16 witnesses who could have helped Mr Wilders.

Clearly the voters understood the real nature of his political prosecution, and they may have decided to support him in order to send a signal that they won’t tolerate this kind of political bullying.

So far little has been heard or see in the UK  MSM about this trial, not surprising really as they are committed to distorting or ignoring the truth.

So far the only politician commenting on the trial is the Italian President Giorgio Napolitano, a member of the now defunct communist party.

Mr Napolitano is concerned the Dutch have voted for a party that is anti-EU, and anti-immigration, and he stated that opposing EU integration is not just dangerous but an illusion because it’s impossible to turn the clock of history back.

The reason I mention Mr Napolitano is because after the ratification of the Lisbon treaty Britain is no longer a sovereign country and politicians like Mr Napolitano can have an influence on the EU mandarins that now run the EU.

Mr Napolitano a few years ago, when he was Interior minister, pushed for an amnesty of hundred of thousands of illegal immigrants living in Italy.

The BNP is not a threat to the treacherous liberal elite running this country but to the whole EU.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

“When the flak gets heavier, you know you are over the target”. When the BNP begins to gather more support in local areas, the local newspapers react hysterically because they believe it’s their “duty” to warn of our threat, and then the usual chorus of condemnation and excoriation from local politicians and community groups ramps up.

The latest example comes from Hemel Hempstead where the support for our party is growing.

According to the Hemel Gazette, the party’s agent Simon Deacon says the newly-formed Hemel Hempstead branch has around 70 members and they could take third place in the forthcoming general election.

“Hemel branch is getting bigger and bigger,” he said.

“There were 200 from Dacorum at the Christmas social.

“In the last Euro elections we polled 3,800 across Hemel Hempstead. In a general election that would probably put us third.”

Mr Deacon, who has a seat on Markyate Parish Council, has spoken out as the BNP fields a candidate in the Adeyfield West by-election.

The 44-year-old, who works for a gardening company, says they aim to fight four or five wards in the next local elections and both Hemel Hempstead and South West Herts constituencies in the general election.

“We’re new to the fight in Hemel. The National Front always used to get good polls in Hemel and we know we can get better polls than them, being more moderate than them,” Mr Deacon said.

But Andrew Williams, leader of Dacorum Borough Council, said while he was concerned at any growth in support for the BNP they remained a minority party.

“I am confident they won’t do well in the elections in Hemel and they will continue to be a minority party that does not reflect the views of the majority,” he said.

“When people are finding it difficult to get jobs they sometimes blame immigration.

“Clearly any growth in support for the BNP is a concern.

“I take the view that as they are a political party they are entitled to stand. It’s the job of the mainstream parties to fight them and ensure they don’t win.

” I can’t think of many people who will agree with their views. They don’t get a lot of support in the town and I hope that continues.

“I think Dacorum is an area where people get on together and we should not let groups like that cause unrest in the community.”

Mr Deacon was a member of the National Front from the 1980s but left after he won a seat in Markyate in 2008.

On his membership of the far right group he said: “I had a good friend of mine who got addicted to drugs and died. I just felt they were the only people who would stand up and be counted about the things at the time.

“I said things I regret. I backed their policy at that time. In the 80s there was no middle road.

“A lot of people in the National Front wanted to be in something else – there was nothing for them.

“I don’t like to be called a racist. The problem with this country is the way it’s being Islamified.

“We would shut the doors now. It’s too full, whatever your background. There’s nearly 70million people in this country.

“The first thing the BNP would do is pull out of the EU.”

Mr Deacon said people from ethnic minorities would be welcome at meetings.

“We’ve had black people come along,” he said.

Racist anti-fash are beginning a campaign in the area and a Facebook group called ‘Stop the BNP in Dacorum’ has been started, an anti racism concert is being organised, and Unite Against Fascism is planning to hold a leaflet drop in Adeyfield.

The action was prompted because the BNP is fielding a candidate in the Adeyfield West by-election taking place on Thursday, March 11.

Music promoter Luke Hinton decided to set up the Facebook group to raise awareness of the situation.

“I did it because I saw no one else has done it. I thought I might as well do it – I feel strongly enough,” he said.

“I don’t want the BNP winning seats in my home town.”

So far the group has 75 members, including would-be Liberal Democrat MP for Hemel Hempstead Richard Grayson.

Mr Hinton, 29, said groups like the BNP only get in if people do not vote.

“If everyone in Hemel went out and voted and the BNP won a seat that would be a true reflection – and I would probably leave town – but I think it’s people hide their heads in the sand,” he said.

“The BNP will only win seats if people aren’t voting.

“That’s why the group was set up – it’s opening people’s eyes.

“The number of people I’ve spoken to who were not aware the BNP were standing.”

Mr Hinton – who organises Juicebox music nights in Hemel Hempstead, St Albans and Watford – is also planning a ‘Love Music Hate Racism’ gig ahead of the general election.

“The idea of it is to put out there that everyone is pretty much equal – it doesn’t matter what colour, creed or sexuality – everyone has the same rights,” he said.

“It’s people standing up and saying: ‘We don’t want to live in a town where people are discriminated against’.”

Mr Hinton, like many other treacherous liberals fails to understand that many native Britons don’t want to be neriched and don’t want Hemel Hempstead to become another Hackney or Newham.

This is why the Labour party, when it planned to swamp Britain with immigrants to change its social fabric, decided to accuse as racist anyone who dared to oppose this plan and passed tough anti-racism laws that make such criticism a criminal offence.

Of course if Mr Hinton wants to leave the town he is more than welcome, I’m sure the local BNP branch will pay him for a ticket to leave not just the town but the country.

I think we should be grateful to Mr Hinton for the free publicity we are getting, at least more people are getting to know about us.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Credit Card fraud costs British banks, buisnesses, and people millions of pounds every year yet the Government gives foreign criminals a slap on the wrist. The BNP says deport all foreign criminals involved in credit card fraud.

WILTSHIRE POLICE   Keeping you informed

Swindon Police Station Gablecross   Shrivenham Road   South Marston   Swindon    Wiltshire SN3 4RB   Telephone:  0845 408 7000

Swindon Crime Reduction Department

Hi all,

This has been passed on via another Force area through our own Fraud Department In Wiltshire Constabulary, and it is a very convincing SCAM. We have been asked to disseminate the information as widely and was quickly as we can through Neighbourhood Watch, School Safe and others.

This one is pretty slick since they provide YOU with all the information, except the one piece they want. Note, the callers do not ask for your card number; they already have it. This information is worth reading. By understanding how the VISA & MasterCard Telephone Credit Card Scam works, you’ll be better prepared to protect yourself.. One of our employees was called on Wednesday from “VISA”, and I was called on Thursday from “MasterCard”. The scam works like this: Person calling says, “This is (name), and I’m calling from the Security and Fraud Department at VISA. My badge number is 12460. Your card has been flagged for an unusual purchase pattern, and I’m calling to verify. This would be on your VISA card which was issued by (name of bank) did you purchase an Anti-Telemarketing Device for £497.99 from a Marketing company based in London ?” When you say “No”, the caller continues with, “Then we will be issuing a credit to your account. This is a company we have been watching and the charges range from £297 to £497, just under the £500 purchase pattern that flags most cards. Before your next statement, the credit will be sent to (gives you your address), is that correct?” You say “yes”. The caller continues – “I will be starting a fraud investigation. If you have any questions, you should call the 0800 number listed on the back of your card (0800-VISA) and ask for Security. You will need to refer to this Control Number. The caller then gives you a 6 digit number. “Do you need me to read it again?”

Here’s the IMPORTANT part on how the scam works the caller then says, “I need to verify you are in possession of your card.” He’ll ask you to “turn your card over and look for some numbers.” There are 7 numbers; the first 4 are part of your card number, the next 3 are the security numbers that verify you are the possessor of the card. These are the numbers you sometimes use to make Internet purchases to prove you have the card. The caller will ask you to read the 3 numbers to him. After you tell the caller the 3 numbers, he’ll say, “That is correct, I just needed to verify that the card has not been lost or stolen, and that you still have your card. Do you have any other questions?” After you say, “No,” the caller then thanks you and states, “Don’t hesitate to call back if you do”, and hangs up. You actually say very little, and they never ask for or tell you the Card number .

But after we were called on Wednesday, we called back within 20 minutes to ask a question. Are we glad we did! The REAL VISA Security Department told us it was a scam and in the last 15 minutes a new purchase of £497.99 was charged to our card. Long story – short – we made a real fraud report and closed the VISA account. VISA is reissuing us a new number. What the scammers want is the 3-digit PIN number on the back of the card.  Don’t give it to them . Instead, tell them you’ll call VISA or MasterCard directly for verification of their conversation. The real VISA told us that they will never ask for anything on the card as they already know the information since they issued the card! If you give the scammers your 3 Digit PIN Number, you think you’re receiving a credit. However, by the time you get your statement you’ll see charges for purchases you didn’t make, and by then it’s almost too late and/or more difficult to actually file a fraud report.

What makes this more remarkable is that on Thursday, I got a call from a “Jason Richardson of MasterCard” with a word-for-word repeat of the VISA scam. This time I didn’t let him finish. I hung up! We filed a police report, as instructed by VISA. The police said they are taking several of these reports daily! They also urged us to tell everybody we know that this scam is happening .

Please pass this on to all your family and friends.. By informing each other, we protect each other..

Paul Phelps

PC1102 Neighbourhood Watch Liaison Officer.

Share

The times are getting tough for David Cameron, the man who wants all of us to integrate into the Muslim way of life.

According to a recent poll the Conservative party have a lead of only 2% over Labour and many thinks that Gordon Brown now has a good chance of staying Prime Minister.

Such a reversal of fortunes would be very embarrassing for the Tory leader, especially when the present government is the most unpopular this country has had in the last 40 years.

So it is not surprising that the Conservatives are trying to woo the traditional Tory voters who are more rightwing than the present party leadership, and it explains why they are putting out leaflets saying the floodgates had been opened to mass immigration.

Critics say the flyers are alarmist and misleading because they imply limits could be imposed on entrants from EU countries such as Poland.

Last night, the party’s frontbench was forced to distance itself from the hard-hitting material, which was put out under the name of Cameron’s home affairs spokesman, Andrew Rosindell.

It bears a picture of him and Mr Cameron,  it says immigration has caused a population explosion, and declares “we simply cannot go on like this”.

Circulated in Rosindell’s Romford constituency, it also suggests that the Tories would impose new transitional controls on the right of nationals of the new EU member states to work in the UK.

Such controls already exist for Bulgaria and Romania, but retrospective limits on other eastern European states, such as Poland and the Czech Republic, would be illegal under EU law.

The pamphlet, which features two Conservatives of Asian ethnicity, also declares that “foreign criminals should be removed from Britain” and features pictures of “hate preachers” Abu Hamza and Omar Bakri Muhammad.

Rosindell said last night: “I did not write or approve this councillors’ flyer. Immigration is an important issue but, as David Cameron has made clear, we must be careful with both the facts and the language we use.

This flyer falls short on both counts, and I shall be pointing that out to the councillors.” However, the material stated that it was “promoted” by the MP.

Meanwhile, Loanna Morrison, the Conservative prospective parliamentary candidate for Bermondsey and Old Southwark, who is black, posted a controversial piece on the political blog, Conservativehome.

“Britain is full, declares Nick Griffin at every opportunity, and he is right,” she wrote.

As many nationalists know Romford is a place where the BNP has a lot of potential supporters and it is no coincidence this leaflet was circulated in that area.

So the Conservatives are talking tough to steal votes from the BNP.

Haven’t we hear this before?

You will remember that Margaret Thatcher used a similar slogan to take away support from the National Front.

However the situation in 1979 was completely different and the trick is not going to work this time, because the BNP is not the NF.

Telling us that a Tory government would put a limit on immigration is a big porkie, given that is the EU who decides on that matter and no one can limit the amount of people with EU passport coming in the UK.

Strangely neither Mr Rosindell nor Mr Cameron say a word about illegal immigrants and no one in the party is attacking Boris Johnson for his support of an amnesty for the one million or so who are not supposed to be here in the first place.

Mr Cameron could say that he is against such an amnesty, and that he will do everything to kick them out but his silence on that proves once again he is a liar.

We will remind our supporters whenever we go out leafleting canvassing, and holding paper sales and the task will be quite easy as Boris Johnson is on our side.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

‘Common Purpose’

http://www.stopcp.com/index.php

No, not a joint effort to achieve a goal benefiting all. But with a ‘Common Purpose’ in the destruction of society as we know it, by persons known to us all, and some who are not. ‘Common Purpose’ are training people to “lead beyond authority” and prepare for  the “post democratic society”.

The main objective of ‘Common Purpose’ is social control in a collectivist and corporatist society. The other objectives of ‘Common Purpose’ are the destruction of the national identity of Britain, the destruction of democracy in Britain, the undermining of traditional beliefs and values and the slow, secretive merging of the public and private sectors into a state-controlled partnership.

What would you say, if I introduced to you a system, whereby, in an ‘open and free society’, some views were not heard at all? Possible? That is precisely what ‘Common Purpose’ has set out to do – create an organisation that instructs its members how they must think and act on a number of key issues such as immigration, multiculturalism, the EU, global warming and any type of nationalism.

The plan, now well advanced, is to create a massive network of ‘training and diversity’ organisations to brainwash the useful idiots needed to run society on behalf of the ‘élite’. These include those involved with the institutions of government, commerce, education, law enforcement etc.

‘Common Purpose’ proposes a ‘design for life’, from a frighteningly early age. If you are with them, you can rise through the system until you reach your calling – but dissent, and you will always be staring upwards from the nadir below. In other words, if you will not play by the rules of the manipulated system, you can kiss any future career goodbye.

We are all being ’shafted’ by a group of so-called ‘élitists’, who see the people as little more than taxable cash cows, that must be firmly indoctrinated and then kept in their place.

‘Common Purpose’ objectives for individuals and families

• Rapidly falling incomes
• House repossessions
• Increasing debt
• Unemployment or low-skill employment
• Poverty
• Overcrowding
• Control from cradle to grave
• Victims of crime
• Cultural disintegration
• Constant surveillance

‘Common Purpose’ objectives for Britain

• Perennial trade deficit
• High unemployment
• Massive debt
• Mortgaged to foreigners
• Inequality
• High population density
• High immigration to destroy the culture
• Social fragmentation
• Economic enslavement
• Organised plunder
• Band-aid NHS
• Politically correct multi-culturalism
• Destruction of the middle class

Objectives for ‘Common Purpose’ members, bureaucrats and politicians

• Rising incomes
• Full employment
• Tax-funded income
• Comfortable pensions
• Private medical insurance
• Human rights
• Lavish spending

This is what Fabian New Labour and ‘Common Purpose’ are creating.

The economic and social chaos we have witnessed in the last 50 years has been deliberately engineered. Why else would this and previous Govt’ have turned this country from a stable and homogeneous society, relatively free to say and do that which was not illegal, into the “look over your shoulder” in case you say something that does not fit with Govt’ Diktat.

Author: reconquista.

http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/#tT6owcNxDTx3

Share

It’s not unusual for a victim of crime to call the Police, and then be told there are no officers available because they are busy.

Upsetting but not unsurprising because the main purpose of the Police service is to harass and intimidate anyone that dares to oppose the destruction of Britain by third-world mass immigration, multiculturalism and political correctness.

We reported a few days ago that Police officers monitored BNP activists when holding a paper sale in Jarrow, South Tyneside.

Apparently, our activists were stopped and searched by the Police when out canvassing.

This is not a case in isolation, West Yorkshire Police are doing their best to entrap “white racists”.

According to the force’ website, Police in Castleford are launching an operation to combat racist abuse. Plain clothes officers from minority ethnic backgrounds will be out on foot in all areas of Castleford.

The officers will be selected from other areas of the District and Force to ensure they are not recognised by locals. The Castleford Neighbourhood Police Team (NPT) have been working closely with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) to ensure that the opportunities to prosecute are maximised with quality evidence.

Inspector Ian Williams of Castleford NPT said, “It is important not only that we look after the interests and welfare of minority groups in the community but are seen to do so.

“The majority of Castleford and Airedale residents are from a white background so I can understand how people from these groups can feel intimidated. We take all hate crime very seriously but it is often difficult to get victims to come forward and give evidence. This pro-active approach to dealing with such incidents protects the victims from having to do so”. (so supposed “racists” will be convicted on heresay evidence?).

“These operations will continue for as long as it takes to get the message across that this sort of behaviour will not be tolerated. I am hoping that by taking a direct approach, more victims will come forward to tell us about the abuse they have suffered. It is vital that people from minority groups have confidence in the ability of the police to deal with their concerns.”(but what about the race hate crimes against the indigenous?)

Gaynor Zeki, Community Prosecutor for West Yorkshire said, “Hate crime of any kind is abhorrent, whether it is based on race, disability, gender or sexual orientation. The CPS will prosecute these cases robustly and vigorously.

“If a case has hate crime elements in addition to other offences, CPS prosecutors will bring this to the Court’s attention so that it can be taken into account at sentencing. This is very likely to result in an increase in the offender’s penalty.

If you have suffered from or witnessed any type of hate crime whether it is as a result of race, disability, sexuality or religion you can get in touch with Castleford NPT on 01924 206210 or anonymously at crimestoppers on 0800 555111.

In principle we can agree with that but what is the definition of racist abuse?

Almost any comment can be seen as racist just so long as it is an asian or black who is offended, and therefore someone can be arrested and prosecuted for saying anything someone else thinks is racist, but will the same rule apply for our benefit?.

By the way this is the same Police force that arrested and prosecuted Nick Griffin for something he said in a pub about Islam.

This is Britain, a carbon copy of 1939′ Italy.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As local Nationalists know only too well, the ‘Regional newspapers’ are always a lot nastier to the BNP than national’ ones.

So it will delight Nationalists no end, to know that the ‘Regional newspaper’ industry continues to lose ‘dead tree press’ readers at an alarming rate, shown by the fact that only two of the 86 daily regional titles managed to increase sales between July and December.

According to ABC figures released today, 17 titles saw their paid-for circulation drop by more than ten percent in the last half of 2009. Trinity Mirror’s Liverpool Daily Post suffered a 20.8 percent drop, giving it a six-monthly daily sales average of 10,222.

UK regional dailies sold a total average of 2.7 million copies per day during the period, a 7.2 percent fall on the same period in 2008.

Newsquest’s Dorset Evening Echo managed a 2.1 percent rise to an average of 18,396 and Johnston Press’s Peterborough Echo recorded a 0.6 percent rise to 16,531.

The privately-owned Wolverhampton Express & Star remains the country’s biggest daily paper, despite an average circulation fall of 7.6 percent to 120,344, followed by Trinity’s Liverpo Echo on 88,519, a 9.5 percent drop.

Regional daily newspaper circulation figures, in order of circulation (all percentages are year-on-year changes)

Express & Star (West Midlands) (Series) 120,344 -7.6%

Liverpool Echo 88,519 -9.5%

Aberdeen – Press & Journal (Series) 75,440 -3.4%

Belfast Telegraph 66,242 -4.6%

Dundee Courier & Advertiser (Series) 65,871 -5.1%

Shropshire Star (Series) 63,107 -6.8%

Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Evening Chronicle 60,554 -9.8%

Glasgow – Evening Times 59,365 -13.2%

Norwich – Eastern Daily Press 59,145 -3.3%

Leicester Mercury 58,284 -10.2%

The Sentinel 54,287 -6.5%

Birmingham Mail 52,752 -14.3%

Aberdeen – Evening Express (Series) 50,947 -2.1%

Hull Daily Mail 47,995 -7.5%

Portsmouth – News & Sports Mail (Series) 47,382 -4.5%

Nottingham Evening Post 46,326 -10.1%

Irish News – Morning 45,667 -4.5%

Darlington – The Northern Echo 44,931 -7.9%

Leeds – Yorkshire Evening Post 44,818 -8.7%

Edinburgh – Evening News 44,464 -5.7%

Teesside – Evening Gazette 43,937 -5.9%

South Wales Evening Post 43,644 -8.8%

Bristol Evening Post 43,247 -7.0%

Leeds – Yorkshire Post 43,095 -5.7%

Sheffield Star & Green ‘Un 42,260 -10.5%

Coventry Telegraph 38,792 -11.0%

Cardiff – South Wales Echo – Evening 36,928 -11.1%

Derby Evening Telegraph 35,784 -8.6%

Plymouth – Western Morning News 35,352 -6.5%

Southampton – Southern Daily Echo 34,900 -5.4%

Bristol – Western Daily Press (Series) 34,109 -10.7%

Daily Post (Wales) 32,864 -5.0%

Plymouth – The Herald 32,268 -6.0%

Southend – Basildon – Castle Point – Echo 32,172 -5.3%

Ipswich – East Anglian Daily Times 30,590 -5.0%

Bradford – Telegraph & Argus 30,218 -11.2%

Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Journal 30,147 -8.3%

Wales – The Western Mail – Morning (Series) 30,133 -10.6%

Grimsby Telegraph 29,220 -7.3%

Bournemouth – The Daily Echo 28,988 -5.7%

York – The Press 28,661 -9.2%

The Argus Brighton 27,161 -9.7%

Lancashire Evening Post 26,960 -4.7%

Lancashire Telegraph – Blackburn (Series) 26,503 -7.2%

South Wales Argus – Evening 25,035 -7.6%

The Gazette – Blackpool 24,877 -7.8%

The Bolton News 24,614 -10.6%

Ulster – News Letter 24,555 -2.8%

Cambridge Evening News 24,077 -4.4%

Dundee Evening Telegraph 22,560 -2.1%

Oxford Mail 22,019 -5.9%

Torquay – Herald Express (Series) 21,912 -4.6%

The Citizen 21,897 -6.7%

Huddersfield Daily Examiner 21,523 -7.6%

Northamptonshire Evening Telegraph – Kettering 20,553 -4.5%

Swindon Advertiser 19,870 -4.7%

Jersey Evening Post 19,520 -2.7%

Lincolnshire Echo 18,943 -6.1%

Norwich – Eastern Evening News 18,831 -10.5%

Weymouth – Dorset Evening Echo 18,396 2.1%

Colchester – Evening Gazette 18,385 -10.4%

The Leader (Wrexham, Flintshire & Chester) 18,368 -8.5%

Exeter – Express & Echo 18,063 -6.7%

Halifax – Evening Courier 18,021 -5.8%

Northampton Chronicle & Echo 17,934 -5.7%

Gloucestershire Echo 17,320 -8.1%

Scunthorpe Telegraph 17,305 -8.1%

Oldham Evening Chronicle 16,925 -12.2%

Peterborough Evening Telegraph 16,531 0.6%

South Shields – Shields Gazette 16,446 -6.1%

Barrow – North West Evening Mail 15,994 -9.4%

Ipswich – Evening Star 15,920 -9.3%

Hartlepool Mail 15,581 -8.6%

Worcester News 15,466 -6.3%

Guernsey Press & Star 15,386 -2.5%

Greenock Telegraph 15,241 -6.8%

Carlisle – News and Star East 14,138 -9.4%

Burton Mail 12,736 -7.3%

Scarborough Evening News 11,727 -7.5%

Birmingham Post 11,442 -

Liverpool Daily Post 10,222 -20.8%

Paisley Daily Express 8,313 -5.9%

Wigan Evening Post 7,499 -9.1%

Carlisle – News and Star West 5,645 -8.6%

Yorkshire Sport (Sat) 4,953 -12.3%

Doncaster Star 2,917 -13.8%

Nationalists will notice that some of the local papers which experienced the highest loss of readers are the same papers that have waged smear campaigns against the BNP by printing lies and interfering in the democratic process.

Their attitude to the BNP has played a role in the decline of revenue from sales, because more and more people are seeing through their lies.

We know that newspapers have an important role to play in the democratic process, but they stopped doing it in a democratic way long ago.

How can democracy be helped when the ‘dead tree press’ use illegal, and immoral methods to castigate and demonise a legitimate, and non proscribed political party?

And how is the ‘dead tree press’ helping our society when they keep pushing  mass immigration and multiculturalism on us when the majority of  indigenous in our country are vehemently opposed to it?

‘Regional newspapers’ complain that council-run’ free papers are competing unfairly with them.

There maybe some truth in that complaint, but as ‘Regional newspapers’ serve the interests of their political and business masters, and as the pipers they play the tune, and so offer little choice.

So why should any working-class man or woman spend money to read articles that call him/her racist and/or an idiot because he/she is against mass immigration?

We say again their pain is self inflicted, and they are now paying the price of their arrogance.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The electoral campaign in Barking & Dagenham has caught the attention of Ugandan newspapers.

The Daily Monitor reports that the Conservative Party has endorsed a Ugandan, Mr Richard Ssemitego, to contest the Eastbury council election in Barking and Dagenham.

Mr Ssemitego’s candidature was announced last week at Bangladeshi Women Association Community Hall in Barking at a function attended by London Mayor, Mr Boris Johnson.

“The most frequent question I am being asked on my campaign trail is about immigration. English people are tired of emigrants in their country and they demand my party’s policy about immigration and yet I am one of them, it is a bit tricky to answer,” he told Daily Monitor on telephone from London yesterday.

Mr Ssemitego,35 will be in a tussle with the incumbent Mr James Edward McDermott Labour Party, Mr Jeffrey Steed the British National Party, Ms Dianne Patricia Challis Liberal Democrat Party, and Mr Ashley Mcllroy UK Independent Party.

In the 2006 elections, Mr McDermott garnered 965 votes in a race that attracted 11 contenders. Mr Ssemitego is currently a Project Manager with Residential Redrich Community Housing Limited in Ilford.

He was campaign manager for Vice President Prof. Gilbert Bukenya in Masuliita town in the 2006 Parliamentary elections.
Elections are slated for May 6 in all London Borough and local authorities. Fifty one councillors form Barking and Dagenham London Borough Council.

It’s  is worth noting that this news was ignored by MSM in the UK and we should give credit to this Ugandan newspaper for reporting this news in a balanced way that would be unthinkable in Britain.

The parachuting of Mr Sseemitego  by the Conservative Party shows that the Tories are worried about us, and will appeal to any minority group to bulk out the votes for them, we know from experience that immigrants vote for their own, and the balkanization of British politics continues.

We all know the Tories are committed to swamping this country with immigrants, just like Labour, and do please remember that Boris Johnson wants an amnesty for the million or so illegal immigrants living here.

The reason Mr Sseemitego finds the question tricky to answer is not because he is an immigrant (I’m Italian but I’m a BNP officer) but because his party plans to deceive the voters on this issue.

Mr Ssemitego could say, if he was genuine that even though he is an immigrant he wants to stop benefits and council houses going to asylum seekers because it is unfair that immigrants who have never abused the system; and he wants illegal immigrants kicked out of the UK as they have broken the law.

Immigrants who came here 30-40 or more years ago agree with us on that, and we know they vote for us because unlike other parties we go out on the streets and talk to people.

What is the position of the Tories on that?

We know the answer, don’t we? Deathly silence!!!!

The other question to be asked is, what are the Tories doing selecting an African in the first place?

Yes the Conservative’ wants to modernise but they also know people tend to vote along ethnic lines and clearly a black candidate would attract much more support from the African living in Barking & Dagenham that a white.

So much for a colour blind society.

Just a question: Will this Bangladeshi Women Association be forced to accept white males as members?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

We nationalists have known for years that the swamping of this country by third-world immigrants, far from being stupidity was a cunning plan hatched a long time ago.

And we have been proven right, it is reported that Whitehall documents prove Labour did indeed encourage mass immigration, even though it knew voters would be opposed to it.

The Government said the public would disagree with immigration because the public was ‘racist’ and ministers were told to change the public attitude.

The thinking on immigration amongst ZaNuLab leaders was set down in 2000 in a document prepared for the Cabinet Office and the Home Office, (“The views in this report are those of the authors, not necessarily those of The Home Office, nor do they reflect Govt policy)” but key passages were redacted before it was published.

The paper was finally disclosed under freedom of information rules yesterday. It showed that ministers were told that only the ill-educated and those who had never met a migrant would be opposed to immigration.

They were also told that large-scale immigration would bring increases in crime, but they hid these concerns from the public at large. That means you and me folks.

Sections of the study, which underpinned the ZaNuLab policy confirmed that between two and three million immigrants had gained entry to Britain in less than a decade, have already been made public.

These sections of the study show that ZaNuLab needed immigration not just for economic reasons, but also to change the demographics of our country.

Fuller details showed that Tony Blair and his ministers had opened the barn door to mass migration knowingly and, in spite of public opposition; reasoning that those who disagreed with them were ‘racists’.

This disclosure is important, because from henceforth no one can accuse us of stirring up racial hatred when we say we have been invaded, this is not too far fetched because anti-racism laws give to the Police power to arrest and prosecute anyone making such a statement.

These documents also might be used in the near future as evidence when putting our elected politicians on trial for treason.

But, this is not the whole story, and unsurprisingly the MSM always distorts the truth.

This study was done in 2000 but the idea of changing Great Britain’ demographics was conceived at least 20-30 years before, and not just in the UK.

In the early ’80s immigration barely appeared in the manifesto of the Labour party and the same can be said of other leftwing parties in Europe.

Why the change?

To understand, it we need to look at the situation of the Soviet Union at that time.

Labour, like other socialist and communist parties in Europe, had economic policies based on high taxes and high spending, and many saw the Soviet-style’ planned economy as the ultimate goal.

The problem was that Soviet Union’ economy was collapsing and many insiders knew that this model was unsustainable in the long run.

In spite of their efforts to deceive the people by portraying the Soviet Union as an example of a workers paradise (the propensity to lie is apparently deeply rooted among marxists then and now) ZaNuLab realised they had to offer different policies and therefore had to adapt to the new situation.

During the ‘80 there was a process of transformation which saw the dropping of socialist policies, the opening up to the free market and the adoption of multiculturalism, mass immigration and support of the EU.

In this way they were not just reinventing themselves but also planning to replace the white-working class with immigrants.

This happened not only in the UK, but everywhere in Europe.

The whole process was made easier by the fact that all the socialist and communist parties are members of Socialist International (SI), an organization coordinating the activities of those parties worldwide.

The link between SI and the big bankers is well known, they share the same interests, because mass immigration benefits both.

Ipso Facto,whatever ZaNuLab planned in 2000 was decided at least 20 years before.

There is also another fact that is never mentioned in the MSM.

When in 1983 Tony Blair was elected as an MP, he was in favour of British withdrawal from the EEC (as the EU was known at that time).

A decade later he was invited to a ‘Bilderberg’ meeting and the year after that he was elected leader of the Labour party (after the then leader of  the Labour party died) and he started the process of transformation that brought about the creation of ZaNuLabour.

You can join the dots for yourselves…It does not make a very pretty picture.

Coincidences? I doubt it very much.

You decide for yourselves..

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Nationalists are well aware that all the main parties are pushing for Turkey to become a full member of the EU, a policy that if implemented could potentially allow millions of Turks to swamp the UK and this would herald the end of Britain as a Christian country.

Fortunately this is unlikely to happen because France and German are strongly against it.

However the question should be asked: do the Turks want to join the EU?

The following is an article printed in Hurriyet, a Turkish newspaper, claiming that Turks are not really keen to join the EU.

Like the UK, the Turkish’ ruling elite is out of touch with the wishes of the people it represents.

Perceptions play a very important role in Turkey’s ties with the
European Union in general and individual EU countries in particular.
Facts do not always bear out these perceptions, of course. But it is
often the latter, and not the former, that count as far as the public
is concerned.

If you sift through the attitudes that the public in France, Austria
or the Netherlands has about Turkey, you will find, more often than
not, that fear has more do with these attitudes than the prevailing
facts. This is why such attitudes often tell us more about the
countries that hold them than they do about Turkey.

But perceptions are things that cut both ways. Turks also have their
perceptions and misperceptions about Europe, which, in turn, tells us
more about Turkey than it does about Europe. Looked at from this
overall perspective, it is clear that the EU is appearing less and
less attractive even for those Turks who believe in the merits of
eventual membership.

Apart from the negative signals concerning Turkey’s EU membership, the
growing feeling is that there is something seriously amiss in Europe,
both politically and economically, that Turks should look at more
closely in trying to chart their future.

No one in their right mind expects the EU to collapse, of course, as a
result of the present economic crisis. There is clearly too much at
stake for that to be allowed to happen. But it is a fact that the
present crisis has placed a dark and heavy cloud over the bloc, and
has brought certain countries, most notably – but not exclusively -
Greece, to what is being termed by the international media as “the
brink of economic collapse.”

Looking at this crisis from the point of view of the man on the
street, it is clear that for all its vast wealth and opportunities,
the EU has been unable to come up with enough regulatory and
infrastructural resources to prevent what is happening today.

While highly understandable to economists who are experts in
retrospective evaluation, this is baffling for laymen in this country,
especially those who have considered EU membership the ultimate
panacea for countries such as Turkey.

Neither do Turks see that the EU’s own basic principles are being
honored today – “Europe’s pacta sunt servanda deficit,” some in Turkey
call it, for obvious reasons – as one country after another puts
national interest above the collective good that the European Union is
supposed to represent.

France, for example, is seen intervening in situations that should be
left to market forces, making financial enticements and threats aimed
at inducing investors in its automotive sector to put their money in
France rather than other EU countries, even if doing so makes less
sense from a business perspective.

Turks also note the increasing griping of average Germans, as
reflected in their popular papers such as Bild. They do not understand
why their taxes should go to save Greeks who – in their remarks, not
mine – “work less and retire earlier than hardworking Germans.” It is
not difficult to imagine this perception spreading to other
self-declared “hardworking members of the EU.”

It is equally incomprehensible for Turks that an EU country such as
Greece should now be accused angrily by its partners of “cooking the
books for years,” and “lying to the EU about its statistics.” This
automatically begs some highly obvious questions.

For example, even if the Greeks were doing this, where was the EU and
its monitoring mechanisms to prevent it from happening? And if the
Greeks were getting away with all of this, what about the other PIIGS
- as Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain, all facing serious
economic crises now – have come to be known, somewhat unkindly, in
Europe?

Neither do Turks see an “EU of equals” anymore. Instead they observe
that the citizens of some member states are considered third-class
citizens of the bloc, especially with respect to getting a job and
settling in other member state, a freedom that is supposedly at the
core of the EU’s basic philosophy.

But it’s not just in the economic sphere that things appear amiss. It
is also clear, looking back over the past 20 years, that despite all
its efforts, the EU has been unable to come up with a coherent and
unified foreign and defense policy, making it next to useless when it
comes to such major international crises as the one that erupted in
Yugoslav or the Iraq wars.

Some EU diplomats in Ankara openly bemoan now the appointment of a
“non-entity” (their term, not mine) as the EU’s foreign minister,
someone who, according to them, “could not even act on Haiti in time.”

Judging by some press reports coming out of Europe, it is not even
clear – despite all that is being said – that the EU will be able to
come up with a strong unified position on Iran, given the differing -
and, in some cases, very large – economic interests that individual EU
members have in that country.

As we said at the start, perceptions and facts are intertwined here,
with the former playing the predominant role as far as public
attitudes are concerned. It is nevertheless a fact for those who try
to follow European affairs more closely that the EU can not be the
same after all this.

Once its economic crisis is over, it is obvious that there will be
more concentration on “deepening” the European Union institutionally
in order to try and ensure that some of the serious shortcomings that
are now surfacing will be overcome. In other words, “enlargement, ”
apart from that which has been promised politically – as in the case
of Croatia – can be expected to be pushed to the back burner.

This deepening process will clearly be a painful and acrimonious one
within the bloc, and one that does not portend well for Turkey’s
potential EU membership either. Given its latest attempts to interfere
in Cyprus, with a view toward putting pressure on the Turkish side -
even if it is not the side that spoiled the only real chance of a
settlement in 2003 – one can expect the EU to be even less attractive
for the average Turk.

It must be said, though, that just like the EU is not going to
“collapse” as a result of what is going on, Turkey is not going to
give up on its EU accession simply because the bloc appears less
attractive to Turks.

Ankara will continue to go through the motions required, at least to
the extent that its national interest allows in the face of what
Europeans have called its “open-ended bid for EU membership.”

Of course, if Europe decided to play fair with Turkey, this could all
change rapidly, but for the average Turk, this appears highly unlikely
from today’s perspective. Ankara will continue, therefore, to go
through the motions until such time as the EU can come up with a
collective position that says “no” to Turkey.

Whether this position of Turkey’s represents “a continuing sincere
commitment to the EU perspective” or contains a grain of
vindictiveness, whereby Ankara is saying, “I will not give you the
pleasure of seeing me pull back my application for membership,” is an
open question.

The bottom line is that while the EU is changing in the face of “force
majeure” developments, so are Turkey and the attitude of Turks toward
the EU. But whether this will ultimately provide succor for those in
Europe who would like to see Ankara give up on the EU is highly
doubtful.

It seems, therefore, that Europe is stuck with Turkey, and the reverse
is also true, even if it is clear that Ankara is also trying to
increase its options by opening up to different parts of the world in
order to reduce its dependence on an unwelcoming and hostile EU.

To put a long story short, the EU all of a sudden seems much less
attractive for Turks than it might have been a few years ago.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Trevor Phillips, Son of Guyana, and head of the EHRC forced the BNP to accept the non- indigenous as members. I argued that this heralded new opportunities for us, and we would, in the end ensure that the Marxist EHRC  regretted it’s attempt to deny us a voice  .

All the smears we have been subjected to are based on the false premiss that the current BNP are a bunch of “racist thugs” ,and that BNP policies are designed to stir up hatred between minority ethnic groups; the acceptance of the demand from Herr Phillips that we change our constitution will make it harder for the pinko/liberal/ bleeding heart elite to attack us.

One person upset with Herr Phillips is Peter Hitchens.

This high profile journalist wrote an article in the Mail on Sunday and made his disappointment with the order clear.

It’s worth a read because treacherous bleeding heart liberals like him will no longer have any reason to castigate and demonize us as racist. ROFPMSL

“As far as I am concerned the Equality and Human Rights Commission is the first step towards a National Thought Police, and should be shut down.
The ‘Equality’ it pursues is the agenda of the cultural and sexual resolutions.
The ‘Rights’ it enforces are the shopping lists of politically correct lobbies.
But it is also dangerous in other ways, as it proved this week. Patriotic conservatives such as me, who loathe the BNP and its cynical pretence that it cares about this country, used to have a killer argument.
When BNP members insisted it wasn’t racially bigoted, we could point to its constitution, which was openly racialist. Now, thanks to the EHRC, which has forced the BNP to change its rules, we can’t.
What on earth was the point of using public money to do that? With the exception of one or two deluded twits, such as the Sikh Rajinder Singh, non-white people do not wish to join the BNP, and if they do they will quickly realise that the party’s conversion is not a genuine one.
If Mr Griffin’s louts and their dupes (whose violence was on display again last week) wish to have a racial clause in their constitution, they should be free to do so.
And we should be free to despise them for it.”

Mr Hitchens, in his own words hoists himself on a petard of his own making, and proves conclusively that he is out of touch with the real world.

It is true that few blacks or Asians will be in the scrum to become members. but in describing the ones who do as “deluded twits” is offensive and insulting to those sensible enough to recognise the road down which we are being led.

Many individuals from minority ethnic groups  are furious about the demographic changes made deliberately by NuLab’ mass immigration plan, and just like us reject the concept of muticultural diversity the MSM are pushing on us.

Immigrants who came here 50-60 years ago, and who respect Great Britain and all it represents resent the influx of newcomers filching our taxes and jobs.

In a multi ethnic society people tend to vote along ethnic lines as all nationalists know, but bleeding heart liberals like Hitchens don’t.

It is less than edifying to see self-loathing, self obsessed liberals like him enrich themselves while treating ordinary people with contempt. They are nothing less than whingeing spineless scribblers, because when the truth is out; and push comes to shove lets see which side he comes  down on.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

ps: By the way folks, never trust anyone with eyebrows that meet in the middle….Hehehehe

Share

If I had the ability to use words to describe how I feel at this juncture, these would be mine. Thank you ‘grumpyoldgit’. ed.

I was born in 1945, actually, on the very day the Japanese surrendered. The optimists could have argued that perhaps this was an omen for the future. Not because of my birth, specifically, but because on the day the carnage, destruction and millions of deaths caused by World War 2 ended, my birth and others like me on that momentous day could have been regarded as symbolic. We could have been seen as the sort of new beginnings the world needed, in order to change the world and be in the vanguard of preventing such horrors ever happening again. Our generation could have been viewed as the rebirth of a new world, a kinder world and a more peaceful world. Growing up in the 1950s, my world was, for the most part , very peaceful.

Of course, there were other conflicts such as Korea, Suez and Malaya. Worldwide, independence groups formed to rid themselves of British colonialism and many of these groups were extremely violent and barbaric such as the Mau Mau in Kenya, or EOKA in Cyprus, but my childhood world in South London passed mostly uneventfully. All my friends were white, we understood each others’ humour and problems. We cycled everywhere and played in bombed out buildings, recreating the second World War, with ourselves always the victors. We searched for shrapnel or unexploded ordnance, (which we occasionally found, and exploded with a hammer, not realising the dangers involved).

Of course, there was a criminal underworld in London, and in other cities, not doubt. We had the gangs from Malta and the Greek Cypriots, fighting each other in turf wars. And there were the notorious Kray twins and their murderous colleagues carving out their ‘manor’ and trying to extend their activities ‘South of the River’, with the expected opposition from the ’southern’ gangs. Yet, none of this affected me and my mates. Nor did it affect our families. Our mothers, sisters and brothers could all walk the streets at night in complete safety. I actually believe that if any of our women folk had been attacked, especially by foreigners, the attackers may have found themselves having to deal with the Krays. Vicious criminals they were, no doubt, but many Londoners believed they operated within a certain code of ethics regarding the treatment of women and children. This belief manifested itself when hundreds of older generation, old-style Londoners turned out for the funerals of Ronnie and Reggie. And the majority of those paying their respects were never involved with the criminal fraternity.

How things have changed from my childhood days in the fifties and my teenage years in the still safe sixties. Over the past half century we have experienced a massive influx of people from all over the world. So massive, in fact, that the influx cannot be considered as anything less than an invasion. And just look at the type of people who have arrived on our shores. We have the descendants of the Mau Mau. We are playing host to the children of those who carried out the slaughter in the Nigerian Biafra genocide. There are probably people in our country who were involved in the recent Rwandan massacres and let’s not forget those civilised folk who were chopping off the arms of people in Sierra Leone, now working as bouncers at our nightclubs. The invasion from the Indian sub-continent has eclipsed all the others. While the majority of Indians, such as the Hindus and Sikhs are decent, law-abiding and hard working folk there is an element from the sub-continent who will never and can never accept or assimilate into our ways, the muslims. And more muslims have poured in from just about every other Islamic country in the world, where they have established networks and organisations up and down the land with the sole objective of creating replicas of the countries they have left, in Europe. By any and all means available, including distribution of drugs, terrorism, grooming our young girls to be exploited and attacking the native population in feral packs. While the ‘authorities’ take a soft touch approach to the threat these people pose to our way of life (and also to other ruthless criminals from different ethnic minorities), the muslims, especially, are consolidating their ‘manors’ in much the same way as the Krays did, all those years ago. With one major difference. The muslims are creating mini-states within the state which have become effective no-go areas for non muslims.

These muslim pack attacks on our native young (and old) are currently forays outside their colonies, in order to test the water for further attacks, in greater intensity, against the wider population, designed to expand their territories even further. Until such time as the muslim population reaches a critical mass with which they can launch all out war against the infidel. As they did in Kosovo.

The halcyon days of the fifties and sixties are now long gone and consigned to nostalgic memory by those, who like me, remember them. Those days can never be returned. I’m glad I have those memories, because my four year old and one year old gran daughters are unlikely to look back on their lives, especially as teenagers and young adults with the same affection. They are likely to have to live in a constant state of conflict between competing cultures fighting for dominance in their land and total dominance over the indigenous peoples. Unless, of course, they can live relatively safely in native reservations, enclaves established specifically for whites only, as we are pushed further and further back towards the sea.

However, not all hope is lost. As the BNP gains more support and grows exponentially, there is still a small chance that we can recover that which has been forcibly taken from us. Failing that, then the only other option is to take a leaf out of the book from those who wanted their independence from British colonial rule and fight for what is rightfully ours.

Share

NuLabour is using the slogan “A Fair Future for All” to start its election campaign in the vain hope of at least coming second at the next GE.

Someone should explain to the voters how Labour plans to be “Fair” when Kent Council proposes to raise the council tax in order to deal with the influx of more asylum seekers.

According to the Daily Express residents in Kent will see their council bills increase by 2.1 per cent after their local authority failed to persuade the Government to hand over more than £7million which the council says it is owed for meeting “asylum seekers” needs.

The Kent port of Dover, and the Channel Tunnel terminal in Cheriton, near Folkestone, have long been the target of “immigrant/asylum seekers” attempts at sneaking into Britain, leading to the county’s “immigration frontline” reputation.

Thousands of “asylum seeker/ immigrants” arrive in Kent each year and need to be housed, fed, and provided with local health care, education and social services, all due to the ‘Yoooooman Rights Act’.

The tax increase will see average bills for the county rise to £1,047.82 for householders in Band D homes – an increase of £22.39 on last year.

Kent County Council, which has an annual budget of around £2.2billion, had wanted to set a tax rise of just 1.86%.

But councillors said they could only have an increase of 1.86% if the Government agreed to reimburse KCC £7.3million in outstanding grants for looking after “asylum seekers”.

Despite intense negotiations, the Home Office has agreed to repay only about £3million and says it disputes the authority’s figures.

The Government claims it has increased grants by 3.2 per cent. But Kent County Council says that amounts to less than £8.5million – well short of what is needed to meet the rising demand for key services.

The authority has pledged that if the money is eventually recouped in full, it will consider cutting bills next year (Yeah in yer dreams KCC tax payers).

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of MigrationWatch UK, said: “The asylum system certainly needs tightening. Britain is clearly regarded as a soft touch. Why else would asylum seekers be queueing up in Calais? ( Duhhhh!!!!!)

“Meanwhile, it is wrong for rate­payers in Kent to be footing part of the bill. It should be a national responsibility.”( Why?  If KCC is stupid enough to allow invaders in, then the KCC taxpayers deserve it)

Roger Gale, Tory MP for Thanet North, said: “The Home Office is short-changing the county and has been for a very long time.

“What they are doing is dumping a national problem on Kent.( Kent voters know what to do then. Vote BNP…)

“Taxpayers are very resentful and very angry and I can understand why.” (Ditto above)

Gina Linehurst, 43, of Canterbury, said: “Bills are just going up and up and if I’m being told that I have to pay more to help asylum seekers then I’m afraid I will have to take issue with the council. This is not right.” (Ditto above)

Of course the taxpayer is furious, and it shows because more of them are supporting the British National Party.

Labour knows that the golden geese are becoming pissed off, and are seeing through the lies and smears , that is why they are working in concert with MSM to attack us with more smear stories but are desperately failing in their attempt to portray us as a bunch of nazi scum.

The positive aspect of this is that the angrier people become, the less likely they are to be hypnotized by MSM.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The BNP has long campaigned using the slogan ‘Homes for Heroes’ so I am surprised to hear Margaret Hodge has decided to become a champion for this BNP Policy. In 2005 we made a General Election Party Political broadcast highlighting the plight of homelessness amongst ex servicemen. View it here. With the BNP again championing the rights of Servicemen and pushing for the withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan Hodge and Labour seem to think they can steal some of our thunder. Oh dear, I think this is going to massively backfire on them. The Labour party is pro war and hundreds of our best young men have lost their blood on the Afghan plains. Thousands more have been badly mutilated by IEDs laid by Taliban and Afghani fighters who want to see NATO occupation troops out of their country.

The fact is our servicemen and ex servicemen like most British people are pushed to the back of the queue in housing. This week yet again we see the injustice of this system highlighted by the mail. Foreign baby factories (Jihad nice name for a baby) who have contributed little or nothing living in luxury funded by our blood sweat and tears.  Read and weep. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1250993/Single-mum-finds-mansion-net-gets-YOU-pay-7-000-month-rent.html

The PPB can be seen here

Share