One of the arguments used by the antifascists to deter people voting BNP is to deliver smear leaflets accusing BNP councillors of being useless, ineffective and failing to attend meetings.

Nationalists know that there are BNP councillors that are hardworking but the MSM never say a word about them as this would be against the NUJ guidelines.

Luckily most councils have a copy of the annual report on their website and everyone can see how many meetings a councillor actually attended in a given local authority.

In Morley Town Council BNP councillor Joanna Beverley has the best record attendance as she went to all the council meetings.

However what is interesting about this local authority is that the councillors that regularly attack Mrs Beverley have such a poor attendance record.

Morley Borough Independent councillors Richard and Helen Benson were the very worst of a bad MBI bunch. The pair failed to attend a single Council meeting, and only managed to avoid being booted off the council due to non-attendance by dragging themselves along to a few committee meetings. In the case of Richard Benson, this meant attending 2 out of 14 meetings of the Finance and General Purposes Committee.

Helen Benson attended one out of the 10 meetings of the Morley Entertainments Sub-Committee and 2 of the 14 meetings of the Community Development Committee.

The combined Benson attendance at committee or council meetings for the 2009-10 year was a laughable 9.6%.

Fellow MBI Party councillors Mary Hicks and Judith Elliott also attended less than half of the council meetings held, and for many of Morley’s ‘independents’ things got even worse at committee level.

Judith Elliott, for example, managed to turn up to a single meeting of the Civic Duties Sub-Committee, and missed the other eleven. Terence Grayshon attended two out of fourteen Community Development Committee meetings and failed to attend a single one of the ten meetings of the Morley Entertainments Sub-Committee.

Nationalists can look at the link below to find out more:

Morley Patriot

Well done to Joanna Beverley let’s hope voters take notice and re-elect her.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

DEFEND FREE SPEECH

Tuesday 7th September Location: Royal Courts of Justice, Central London. Please attend our demonstration in support of BNP leader Nick Griffin,who is facing jail for standing up to Trevor Phillips and co. Time TBC but plan for 10am onwards. With the Commission threat to jail Nick Griffin, this is sure to attract media attention,so a good BNP turnout is vital.

BRING OUR BOYS HOME

Wednesday 8th September Location: Waterstone’s Bookshop in Piccadilly, central London Oppose Tony Blair’s blood-money book-signing. Meet at 1pm outside Waterstone’s Bookshop in Piccadilly, central London.This should be a lively event. Come in groups, bring loudhailers and whistles as well as your own anti-Blair,anti-war, pro-troops placards. More info on 07810 731 299.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

workingmannews
AMERICA AND BRITAIN WAGE WAR TO PROTECT RIGHT TO RAPE LITTLE BOYS!

Joel Brinkley
Western forces fighting in Southern Afghanistan had a problem. Too often, soldiers on patrol passed an older man walking hand-in-hand with a pretty young boy. Their behavior suggested he was not the boy’s father. Then, British soldiers found that young Afghan men were actually trying to “touch and fondle them,” military investigator Anna Maria Cardinalli told me. “The soldiers didn’t understand.”

All of this was so disconcerting that the Defense Department hired Cardinalli, a social scientist, to examine this mystery. Her report, “Pashtun Sexuality,” startled not even one Afghan. But Western forces were shocked – and repulsed.

For centuries, Afghan men have taken boys, roughly 9 to 15 years old, as lovers. Some research suggests that half the Pashtun tribal members in Kandahar and other southern towns are bacha baz, the term for an older man with a boy lover. Literally it means “boy player.” The men like to boast about it.”Having a boy has become a custom for us,” Enayatullah, a 42-year-old in Baghlan province, told a Reuters reporter. “Whoever wants to show off should have a boy.”

Baghlan province is in the northeast, but Afghans say paedophilia is most prevalent among Pashtun men in the south. The Pashtun are Afghanistan’s most important tribe. For centuries, the nation’s leaders have been Pashtun.

President Hamid Karzai is Pashtun, from a village near Kandahar, and he has six brothers. So the natural question arises: Has anyone in the Karzai family been bacha baz? Two Afghans with close connections to the Karzai family told me they know that at least one family member and perhaps two were bacha baz. Afraid of retribution, both declined to be identified and would not be more specific for publication.

As for Karzai, an American who worked in and around his palace in an official capacity for many months told me that homosexual behavior “was rampant” among “soldiers and guys on the security detail. They talked about boys all the time.”

He added, “I didn’t see Karzai with anyone. He was in his palace most of the time.” He, too, declined to be identified.

In Kandahar, population about 500,000, and other towns, dance parties are a popular, often weekly, pastime. Young boys dress up as girls, wearing makeup and bells on their feet, and dance for a dozen or more leering middle-aged men who throw money at them and then take them home. A recent State Department report called “dancing boys” a “widespread, culturally sanctioned form of male rape.”

So, why are American and NATO forces fighting and dying to defend tens of thousands of proud pedophiles, certainly more per capita than any other place on Earth? And how did Afghanistan become the pedophilia capital of Asia?

Sociologists and anthropologists say the problem results from perverse interpretation of Islamic law. Women are simply unapproachable. Afghan men cannot talk to an unrelated woman until after proposing marriage. Before then, they can’t even look at a woman, except perhaps her feet. Otherwise she is covered, head to ankle.

“How can you fall in love if you can’t see her face,” 29-year-old Mohammed Daud told reporters. “We can see the boys, so we can tell which are beautiful.”

Even after marriage, many men keep their boys, suggesting a loveless life at home. A favored Afghan expression goes: “Women are for children, boys are for pleasure.” Fundamentalist imams, exaggerating a biblical passage on menstruation, teach that women are “unclean” and therefore distasteful. One married man even asked Cardinalli’s team “how his wife could become pregnant,” her report said. When that was explained, he “reacted with disgust” and asked, “How could one feel desire to be with a woman, who God has made unclean?”

That helps explain why women are hidden away – and stoned to death if they are perceived to have misbehaved. Islamic law also forbids homosexuality. But the paedophiles explain that away. It’s not homosexuality, they aver, because they aren’t in love with their boys.

Addressing the loathsome mistreatment of Afghan women remains a primary goal for coalition governments, as it should be.

But what about the boys, thousands upon thousands of little boys who are victims of serial rape over many years, destroying their lives – and Afghan society.

“There’s no issue more horrifying and more deserving of our attention than this,” Cardinalli said. “I’m continually haunted by what I saw.”
As one boy, in tow of a man he called “my lord,” told the Reuters reporter: “Once I grow up, I will be an owner, and I will have my own boys.”

© 2010 Joel Brinkley

Note: Beardless boys are looked on as girls. Once puberty kicks in they are no longer seen as such.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Much like the Nazis of the Second World War era who installed themselves at every level of public office to control people’s lives and enrich themselves the Labour Party in Barking and Dagenham are now looking to infiltrate and control every corporate and public body in the borough. As there is no official opposition and with a local press very much in its pocket allegations of political corruption and criminality are on the increase.

One example of this high level corruption can be illustrated by the way Labour party members have taken control over previously Independent Tenants and Residents Associations. These TRAs have access to grants of tens of thousands of pounds of council and government money and can apply for lottery funding. These associations often unaccountable and opaque can be used to do fake deals and give back handers much in the same way as holding companies in the Caribbean are regularly used by dodgy politicians and businessmen. Open to abuse and corruption TRAs are now allegedly diverting money away from schemes or projects which benefit local people for enrichment of Labour party members and their associates. Darren Rodwell, a failed businessmen and now a councillor in Alibon Ward, is one such case where the system falls over. He took control of the TRA in Alibon Ward and has used money given to him by residents to finance activities that have benefited himself and a small segment of the Labour voting community. Darren is no stranger to enriching himself by acquiring titles and getting on the gravy train. He has in the past benefited from funding given from the United Against Fascism group a quasi terrorist organisation involved in street level violence and criminality. Rodwell is also employed by DABD UK another organisation which gets money from government sources. It has also recently been announced that Rodwell has become a Non executive director of Barking and Dagenham NHS. Not bad for a failed businessman. Most sitting Labour Councillors on Barking and Dagenham Council have no other declared sources of income apart from their councillors pay and claimed expenses. This includes Liam Smith the Council leader. These leaves Labour Councillors wide open to allegations that they are funding and enriching themselves and their families from the public purse.

As we know Blair and Brown both former leaders of the Labour party have been enmeshed in scandals where they have been accused of taking money from dodgy foreign businessmen and diverting public funds to fund the Labour party.

If you know of any corruption taking place in Barking and Dagenham please ring the councils Fraud Hotline number on 020 8227 2789 or leave a comment below.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

In spite of the huge amount of money raised to finance charitable initiatives in poor countries, it’s as clear as mud how much of it really reaches the people that need it most.

Indeed it is suspected that many of these charities are not really transparent, and it has long been rumoured that more than a few of them spend a large part of their donations on salaries and expensive SUVs.

How much of this is true it’s hard to say, but recently the Charity Commission criticised African Aids Action for using donations to pay for a string of personal expenses, including over £800 on clothing and a trip on the London Eye.

The regulator published the result of its long-running inquiry into the charity, set up to build a pharmaceutical plant in Africa to produce cheap Aids drugs.

The inquiry opened in August 2008 following a complaint alleging that money raised by the charity had been used for the benefit of the family of Eyob Ghebre-Sellassie, the organisation’s chair and founder.

It found that in July 2008, money from the charity’s account was used by the chair to buy clothing, with payments on a debit card of £817.97 and £57.

Bank statements for the charity showed that funds had been used for a number of other expenses, including £29.99 at The Perfume Shop and £16.98 at Sports World. The charity’s money was also spent at McDonald’s restaurants, the Odeon cinema chain and the London Eye, it says.

The trustees explained that the clothing bill was for two suits that Ghebre-Sellassie would wear in a TV documentary.

“The purchase of suits for a trustee, even for use on charity business, is not a proper expense for a charity to pay,” the report says.

Ghebre-Sellassie said none of his expenses were personal and said that every company has expenses.

The inquiry states it was told that some payments were made for food, clothing and other benefits for people living with HIV, but trustees could not produce any evidence.

The report also states that it understands AAA is a small charity and “dependent on the goodwill and personal contributions of the individuals acting as trustees”.

The inquiry also found a number of inaccuracies in various annual accounts filed with the commission, including inconsistencies with the income reflected in the charity’s bank statements and those that were filed with the commission.

Both the report and Ghebre-Sellassie said the charity’s accountant disagreed with the commission on a number of points about the revised accounts the charity was asked to produce.

The inquiry also found that until August 2009, Ghebre-Sellassie was the only trustee whose appointment was registered at Companies House.

The charity’s governing document requires there be a minimum of two trustees, a requirement that the charity met during the inquiry.

The report sets out steps for trustees to follow so as to ensure they comply with legal duties, such as ensuring all financial records are kept in good order.

Ghebre-Sellassie said he did not need to follow the plan because the charity already did all the things it set out.

He said he would sue the commission for “deliberate negligence, defamation, discrimination, blackmail and mental torture”.

“The fact that so much taxpayers’ money has been wasted on investigating such a small charity is a complete joke,” he said.

Cases like this are common, but given the lack of control and supervision over the many thousands of charities and NGOs it’s not that surprising.

Of course I’m well aware that many volunteers are doing a marvelous job helping the poor people in developing countries, but unfortunately there are also many who use these charities as a way to line their pockets.

This is not just unfair to the many people who donate money but it’s also criminal because stealing money destined for the poor is one of the worst crimes that one can commit.

For that reason if the accusations against Eyob Ghebre-Sellassie are found to be true he should be kicked out of Britain and all his assets seized.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Don’t you just love the UAF?

They campaign against the ‘fascist’ and ‘racist’ British National Party (at least that is what they say about us) and repeat the mantra, telling people we are violent skinheads who bring hatred and division between communities, and that we must be stopped by any means possible, but who has just hit the headlines for threatening behaviour, and violent attacks against anyone who disagrees with them and their bully boys tactics?

The UAF of course.

However there is something interesting about the Unwashed Antifa Freaks that has been ignored by MSM.

Their website reports that PCS union leader Mark Serwotka and Drew McConnell of indie band Babyshambles will be speaking in support of UAF officer Martin Smith (style guru), who faces serious charges after the demo against British National Party leader Nick Griffin’s appearance on BBC’s Question Time.

Martin (style guru), who is also national coordinator of Love Music Hate Racism, was arrested at the protest and has been charged with assaulting a police officer. He strenuously denies the charge.

Mark Serwotka and Drew McConnell will be speaking at a protest outside the court. They will be joined by former UCU general secretary Paul Mackney, Zita Holbourne, joint chair, Black Activists Rising Against Cuts (Barac), Rock Against Racism founder Roger Huddle and LMHR supporters The King Blues.

The protest will take place at 9am Tuesday on 7 September at South Western Magistrates Court, 176a Lavender Hill, London SW11 1JU

Apparently the RMT London Fleet 960 branch made a £200 donation to help to cover the cost of this demonstration.

However what nationalists will find quite interesting is that the UAF are lobbying several trade unions to support their right to protest (what they mean by the word protest is anyones guess) by asking them to support the motion below:

This union branch/organisation notes:

1. Martin Smith (style guru), the national coordinator of Love Music Hate Racism and an officer of Unite Against Fascism, faces a serious charge following the demo against British National Party leader Nick Griffin’s appearance on the BBC’s Question Time.

2. Martin (style guru) was arrested on the protest and has been charged with assaulting a police officer. He strenuously denies the charge.

3. Thousands of people joined the UAF demo on 22 October last year against nazi Nick Griffin’s invitation onto the flagship Question Time programme. The demo was backed by trade unions Unite, PCS, CWU, Bectu, Aslef, TSSA, the Musicians Union and the South East Regional TUC.

This union branch/organisation agrees:

1. This case involving a leading antifascist activist could also have implications for other antifascists in future.

2. It is important to stand up for our right to protest.

This union branch/organisation resolves:

1. To support the protest outside Martin’s (style guru) hearing: 9am Tuesday 7 September
South Western Magistrates Court, 176a Lavender Hill, London SW11 1JU

2. To make a donation of …… towards Martin’s (style guru) court costs.

To put this in perspective you should remember that the UAF thugs enjoy protection from the Police, in a normal country they would be left rotting in jail especially when they cowardly target frail old activists who cannot defend themselves.

But no Police force, however PC it is, will ever tolerate any assault on one of their officers and Martin Smith (style guru) will hopefully pay the price for his arrogance and stupidity.

Let’s hope he goes to jail, see if he enjoys the company of black and asian prisoners he loves so much.

In the meantime I would like to know what Darren Rodwell, Labour councillor in Barking & Dagenham and UAF supporter, has to say on this subject, as he claims to be strongly opposed to political violence.

He is more than welcome to post a comment.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Before the GE of 2010 a poll was taken on the policies of the contenders. The BNP had an approval rating of something like 64% if I recall, but when the policies were revealed to be those of the BNP its approval rating dropped drastically. This tells me something about the mindset of the voter.
Memes work, and the traitorous hegemony of LibLabCon and the ruling elite which control them have the copyright. The force of will is our weapon of mass destruction, and our will is strong.

Newsletter from Nick Griffin.

Can you imagine a government that treated its own elderly with less priority than undeserving foreigners.

Can you imagine a government that cuts the benefits of our elderly whilst simultaneously spending over nine thousand million pounds on the Third World.

Such a government should rightly be subjected to a backlash of righteous public disgust and cast onto the rubbish heap at the next available election.

Not so in Britain. The ‘conservative’ government of David Cameron has cut the winter fuel allowance for our long suffering elderly whilst at the same time expanding aid for Afghanistan, ring fenced the budget for the ongoing and unwinnable war in Afghanistan and protected from his much trumpeted spending cuts the entire bloated foreign aid budget. Doesn’t it make you seethe with anger and disgust?

David Cameron doesn’t care though about our elderly, some 40,000 of whom died from cold last winter, he is a multi-millionaire, and so are most of his cabinet.

Now imagine a government that scrapped foreign aid and spent those billions on our own people.

Imagine a government that immediately withdrew our troops from Afghanistan, leading to the halt of more British deaths.

Imagine a government that withdrew Britain from the EU and made us a fully sovereign independent nation state once again.

Imagine a government that halted all further immigration and introduced a ‘British first’ policy, tied to voluntary repatriation,
leading to a country where we feel at home once again.

Imagine a government that banned all extremist Islamic groups and deported all those connected to extremist groups.

Imagine a government that crushed crime and put the rights of victims first before criminals.

Imagine a government that vigorously promoted British culture, traditions, history and national identity.

Imagine a government that took the banking system by the scruff of the neck and used it to rebuild British industry, creating millions of well paid and secure jobs.

Imagine a government that stopped welfare scroungers from abusing the system and made layabouts work for their benefits.

Imagine a government that rejected political correctness and provided common sense policies to transform our country in the decent, honourable homeland for our people it once was.

Do you think there is anything unreasonable in the above?
If not please forward to all those in your contact list regardless of political leanings. Copy and paste the highlighted area, forward to your contacts and see what they say.

I apologise to the author for any adjustments to the text. (ed)

Share this post:

Hide Sites

In personal relationships – and politics is no exception – we can only walk half of the way and expect others to do the same. When this does not happen, both in personal relationships and in politics, people simply walk away from each other and follow their own path.

People who apparently share identical beliefs about what needs to be done might have and have different views about how to achieve the same goals. Both personal relationships and politics are surrounded by a kind of aura that makes people believe that ‘they are in it together’.

When the aura is gone there is little we can do to stay together because while the aura was there we saw each other as one and once the aura is gone we see each other as different and separate entities. This is unavoidable and we simply learn from it and move on.

I am one of those who will do as much as possible to keep things together and one of my favourite expressions is: attack swiftly and don’t disperse your forces. The Romans knew a bit about it when they organized their Centuria and with fewer number of troops, but extremely well organized, they managed to defeat enemies that were numerically superior.

In the meantime, let us think about what is at stake. Compared to the Britain of 1939, Britain is a significantly weaker country, a much more divided country, and there is worse to come. Despite all the talk about diversity what we have today is a country dominated by ghettos.

A new bill is going through Parliament that will recognize segregation rights. Without seeing the final text of the bill, I can only assume that there will be irreconcilable obstacles to overcome to make segregation laws fit together with anti-discrimination laws.

If polygamy is recognized as an acceptable social arrangement, how on Earth can we punish people for bigamy? And this for starters. Most conflicts arise because of serious contradictions and much of the legislation produced by Parliament in recent years seems to have been conceived by madmen because it defies logic and rationality.

When serious conflict arises, people will be looking for certainties and there is nothing more uncertain than political organizations without North. The fact that no political organization managed to achieve an absolute majority is telling us, very clearly, that uncertainties are growing and becoming widespread. We shouldn’t discard the possibility that once again, England’s green and pleasant land might be covered with blood.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I am sure it will be fresh in the memory of Nationalists how, during the European elections, MSM ran a massive smear campaign against the British National Party in order to deter voters from supporting us.

What was really upsetting were the number of lies printed attacking us.

Journalists knew it was illegal but they deliberately chose to breach the law because they knew we that we didn’t have the resources to start legal action and the libel law covers individuals and not political parties.

One of the nastiest newspapers was the Manchester Evening News (MEN), at that time part of the Guardian Media Group (it’s now owned by the Trinity Mirror Group).

Its chief editor never concealed his hatred for us, and he admitted quite openly that any means was legitimate to stop us.

The good news (indeed) is that MEN’ journalists are now having an hard time because apparently, their new employer is keen to maximise profits.

Below is a comment from by Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette 2nd August, that describes the feeling of frustration among MEN’ journalists.

As the profits pile in from MEN Media, why indeed is Trinity Mirror cutting yet more jobs?

Trinity Mirror paid Guardian Media Group £7.4m for its regional newspapers business on 28 March. As of 4 July Trinity had already made £2.7m profit on turnover of £18.2m out of the Manchester Evening News and some 33 weekly titles. By the end of the financial year Trinity Mirror will probably have made the entire purchase price back.

No wonder National Union of Journalists members at the Manchester Evening News are ‘baffled’ that Trinity Mirror is planning to make ten of them redundant.
Especially considering the fact that when Trinity Mirror bought the MEN it promised that there was “no redundancy programme planned”.

In Trinity’s interim results it notes that the purchase of GMG Regional Media has been “highly successful” delivering “strong revenue and profit performance”.
If anything the company seems pleasantly surprised by how well the new division has done. So why the need for the unplanned-for redundancy programme?

Trinity is already saving a shed-load of money by moving MEN Media staff from their smart city-centre offices in Manchester to vacant space in a printworks in Chadderton, Oldham, which it already owns. Just last year some 78 editorial jobs were cut at MEN Media as it closed all the weekly newspaper offices.

It does seem short-sighted to make a new wave cutbacks just as the business is getting on its feet again, by further integrating the weekly and daily newspaper editorial teams.

Here’s what the MEN Media NUJ chapel said on Friday:

“Today’s statement showing encouraging interim results from Trinity Mirror and including an acknowledgement of the great financial contribution already being made by the recently-acquired MEN Media, leaves us even more baffled and angry that we are currently in the process of shedding up to 10 more journalists’ jobs on top of the 78 axed last year.

“Over the past few years, journalists at the Manchester Evening News and weekly newspapers have seen that when business is good, management cuts our jobs, when business is bad, management cuts our jobs and then business is improving, management cuts our jobs. Different management, same philosophy.”
The reason for the latest cutbacks lies, I suspect, with the need to hit group-wide cost reduction targets, of £25m for the year to help pay down overall debt which currently stands at £308.4m.

Trinity Mirror is to be congratulated for turning the financial performance around so quickly, and to a certain extent can’t be blamed for the economic realities of being a big Plc which has funded what it sees as necessary expansion through taking on debt.

But given GMG and the Scott Trust’s long association with Manchester, and its constitutional commitment to supporting journalism, might it have sought an exit from its regionals business which would have better served its old home-town?

There must have been any number of of wealthy individuals, or companies, with strong local links to Manchester who would have been delighted with the sort of return Trinity Mirror is now enjoying from its new regionals business, been proud to own such an esteemed set of media titles and not felt the same pressure to cut costs.

Nice to see those useless, unwashed, spoiled marxists feeling the pain, and this is made more enjoyable by the level of their stupidity.

Nationalists will have noticed how, someone who claim to be anti-capitalist and for social justice, is asking the help of the greedy capitalists that they claim to hate so much.

Why someone would be proud to own these newspapers is quite beyond me, they are not worth the paper they are printed on and the fact that businesspeople around Manchester refused to waste money advertising in them speaks for itself.

Usually journalists tend to oppose any plan from individuals or companies to buy their newspaper as they fear the new owner could undermine their independence but apparently those useless marxists care only about their fat salaries.

Those journalists deserve everything they get, not just because they have contempt for anyone against mass immigration and diversity.

They think it’s right for BNP activists to be assaulted by UAF thugs and they refuse to report in an unbiased way every crime committed by blacks and asians against native British.

Let’s hope all of them are soon to be unemployed and pay the price of their own arrogance.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Nationalists will remember that after Labour won all 51 council seats in Barking & Dagenham, I predicted they would soon upset many of the voters who elected them, and that the huge council deficit meant they would have to make unpopular decisions.

First it was schools, next staff now the Barking & Dagenham Post have reported that mums have slammed the council’s decision to close a popular creche at a Dagenham sports centre as part of its cash saving measures.

The authority announced last week that Goresbrook Leisure Centre’s creche, in Ripple Road, used by more than 30 children a week, will shut on November 5 after 19 years. BNP councillors previosly forced the Labour group to keep it open.

Labour Town hall chiefs have fumbled they now state the creche is running at a loss which, “given the financial pressures” the borough is facing, cannot be sustained. Great throw the baby out with the bath water.

They suggest parents use Castle Green Nursery instead – a good walk from Goresbrook Leisure Centre.

A spokesman from the council claimed that taking this decision was far from easy but the council had no choice. Yeah right…

The town hall must save £42m in the next four years, and Labour have stated worse is yet to come. There mismanagement is to blame for the meltdown in finances in the first place.

Labour councillors should explain why the council claimed it couldn’t afford to keep the creche open, yet it managed to find £62,600 for spending on asylum seekers some illegal from Harmony House all under the guise of a race equality project and fighting discrimination and promote community cohesion. You couldn’t make it up. Come on  Liam grow a spine.

To be more precise the council gave to Harmony House in:

2009/10 £31,300

2010/11 £62,600

2011/12 £62,600

It’s interesting that the amount of money earmarked for this project was increased by 100% after the BNP councillors were swept from the town hall.

Clearly without opposition Labour feels free to waste more taxpayers’ money on useless projects like this. or are they pocketing it.

It’s a shame, after all this closures affect ethnic minorities as well and surely the creche helped children from different backgrounds to get along whatever their ethnicity.

But what you can expect from Labour?

Did they promise to save money by closing the council run’ free news sheet or targeting the £3m spent on salaries for 31 town hall chiefs (just to name a couple of examples of wasteful expenditure)?

Of course not, it was the British National Party who did but we are still accused of ignoring the need of local people and being out of touch.

The only positive aspect of this story is that it will help us get BNP councillors elected in 2014.

Whatever the MSM say about us, the BNP branch in Barking & Dagenham is not only still active, but are planning new initiatives in the near future.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The previous Labour government which ran Britain for 13 years achieved a reputation for being probably one of the worst in the last 40 years.

One aspect of 13 years of government was the use of spin doctors, a derogatory term used to describe people who worked with the MSM to manipulate public opinion in order to push unpopular policies.

A classic example was the sexed-up dossier claiming that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and that an attack on British soil by Iraq was imminent.

This piece of fiction was used for a massive media campaign designed to convince people that a war in Iraq was justified, and as a consequence of those lies, hundreds of British soldiers and many thousands of innocent Iraqis died.

This of course, is just one example, let’s not forget the massive wave of propaganda in support of mass immigration and diversity, the effects of which can be seen by all who have seen his/her neighboroughood changed beyond recognition.

Nationalists will be delighted to hear that the army of spin doctors and media consultants bounced off the gravy train of Downing Street after Gordon Brown was also bounced in the GE have become a little too big for their boots – with the result that few of them can find new jobs.

According to a report in PR Week, most of the former aides, perhaps unaware that the economy has encountered a few problems while they were beavering away in Westminster, are apparently demanding salaries in excess of £80,000, with some expected to be paid as much as £100,000.

Their demands have stunned industry experts. One told the magazine: “You pay that for a director, but there’s not a hope in hell that some of these people will earn that. They need to get in the real world.”

To make matters worse, many of the aides jettisoned by Labour have decided that they want to move into the corporate world, and are turning up their noses at jobs with a public affairs focus.

But PR Week’s source points out that having served their apprenticeships in the hallowed cloisters of Westminster, they have little commercial experience. “You’ve got to earn your spurs first,” he says.

Therefore many are missing out on lucrative PR jobs.

Some of Labour’s abandoned spin corps(e) have found work, but in the charity sector. They include Peter Hain’s former aide Claire McCarthy (at 4Children), Jack Straw’s former helper Mark Davies (at Rethink) and Justin Forsyth, once a senior Brown strategist (at Save the Children).

Two of Brown’s former press handlers have landed on their feet: Mick Dugher and John Woodcock have both become MPs. Not a bad salary – but lousy expenses, of course.

It’s clear that the arrogance of those people knows no limit and they deserve all they get (or don’t).

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

To understand some of the damage caused by our membership of the EU, one only need look at the flood of regulations coming straight from Brussels which affect every aspect of our lives.

It’s not a ‘Jack and Jill’ book we are talking about, it is tens of thousands of pages of rules that require a huge amount of time and a great deal of patience to understand.

These EU rules and demands have played a large part in the destruction of the British economy, especially in the manufacturing sector and nationalists who run a business will know exactly what I’m talking about.

You will not therefore be surprised to hear that new Brussels red tape for this year will cost Britain nearly £10billion.

The shocking cost is just for regulations enforced in this financial year, so are on top of the existing EU burden.

Tory MP Philip Davies, said: “It’s absolutely astonishing and just goes to show how uncompetitive the EU is making British business.

“The vast majority of businesses don’t have any dealings with the EU. It’s particularly galling that they have to bear the costs of the regulations. When people realise how much the EU costs they will come to the conclusion that we would be better off out.”

Before the election, Labour estimated British and EU regulations in force from April would cost businesses, the public sector, voluntary groups and individuals between £27.8billion and £30.3billion a year.

Thirty-one per cent, between £8.6billion and £9.4billion, is down to EU laws, according to Business Minister Mark Prisk.

Dr Lee Rotherham, of the campaign group the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: “The cost of the red tape now exceeds the value of the business it is intended to regulate. It’s sheer madness, and not why we joined in the first place.”

Maybe Mr Davies should direct his concern to David Cameron, the man who first promised and then denied a referendum on the EU treaty.

Indeed he and the Lb-Con coalition, far from taking away power from Brussels, want the integration process to go further.

If Philips Davies is really determined to stop this madness he should jump ship and join the British National Party, the only political party who want to withdraw the UK from the EU.

Any chance it will happen?

Don’t hold your breath.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

More from BC1959 Black Country Patriot

Music To Our Ears

The Western people have been subjected to the most evil, corrupt, and insanely greedy elite, who have taken our natural love of music, art, architecture, inventions, and natural inquisitiveness, and retarded and stunted it to the lowest form. Two quotes that justify this opinion, are:
Give me control of a nation’s currency and I care not who makes the laws: Mayer Amschel Rothschild (Red Shield)

Music is a higher revelation than all wisdom and philosophy. Music is the electrical soil in which the spirit lives, thinks and invents: Beethoven

One is indicative of the love of money, lots of it, and its power to corrupt. The other, exemplifies the western love of music, and what it means to the mind. When the Greeks, who were an inventive people, and part of our now dismal, 8% and falling European brotherhood, listened to music, they quite literally sang it’s praises. They further invented instruments to enhance theirs, and our current culture, and proved that the beauty of the Lyre, the pipes, and drums, along with the human voice, could enhance life, and produce a civilised, cultured, and peaceful social order.

Music to our enemy’s ears, is the sound of millions of houses being sold for a pittance, engineered social disorder, murder, wars, and Capitalist funded Communist/Marxist projects. Music to our ears is Elgar, Grieg, the beauty of a Saxon or Norman village church, the bells, and the sights and sounds of others like us, shopping in the small market towns, cities, and villages. To our enemies, this is hell on earth. They naturally, and over hundreds of years, have made it their lifes work to engage with Europeans, and then create a system within a system.

The era we now live in, if you can call it living, is one of hate, distrust, making vast profits, and engineering social agendas that are completely unnatural to the white mans mind. The descendants of the ancient money changers, produce a decade or two of bloated good fortune, then turn the taps off. Our ancestors produced over the centuries beautiful architecture, music, and innovations that ensured our enemies remained malevolent and envious, and as Sir Winston Churchill was quoted as saying:

“From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing”.

To many a Nationalist, the quote is familiar. But to newer arrivals, or even to those who simply use these sites as part of their journey around the internet, the quote could be a real shock. Ideally, it should be, because not only were famous and much loved Prime Ministers, Journalists, and what passed for Celebrities in years gone by, able to actually write and speak freely, but what was written and spoken, was one of actual experience. Again, Churchill also had much to say about Islam and it’s potential for the western world:

“Civilisation is confronted with militant Mahommedanism. The forces of progress clash with those of reaction. The religion of blood and war is face to face with that of peace. Luckily the religion of peace is usually the better armed”.

Churchill had no idea that the term, Religion Of Peace, would be used to describe Islam by his modern counterparts when he was talking about 20th century Christianity, and of course, the very people he was quoted as warning us against in the first quote… the elitist International families who funded and founded Communism, and the dozens of front organisations used to cloak them, such as The Frankfurt School. Here is paragraph 3 and 4 of the Council of Europe’s agenda to deal with totalitarian countries, past and present:

3 – The crimes were justified in the name of the class struggle theory and the principle of dictatorship of the proletariat. The interpretation of both principles legitimised the “elimination” of people who were considered harmful to the construction of a new society and, as such, enemies of the totalitarian communist regimes. A vast number of victims in every country concerned were its own nationals. It was the case particularly of the peoples of the former USSR who by far outnumbered other peoples in terms of the number of victims.

4 – The Assembly recognises that, in spite of the crimes of totalitarian communist regimes, some European communist parties have made contributions to achieving democracy.

Council of Europe

So that makes it acceptable then? Of course it does, because both Capitalism and Communism engage in the same thing… oppression, vast profits, and the same family ties decade after decade to ensure the plan continues regardless of the consequences. So why is the Western man and woman so different? Quite simply because we are not only inquisitive, adventurous, and genetically predisposed to the higher arts, architecture and music, but we have a far older gene base than the Cultural Marxists would like you, or our younger generation, to become aware of.

Our enemies, led by those whom Churchill described as: reconstructing a society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, have their chief God, love of money. And they have their heroes… Marx, Freud, Trotsky, Lenin, and Stalin etc, and all that these evil parasites darkened, soiled and bloodied over the years. We on the other hand have ours… Plato, Socrates, Shakespeare, Nelson, our national Kings and Queens, Elgar, Grieg, Beethoven, Britten, Vaughan Williams, and those who built Stonehenge, and he of vision, Sir Christopher Wren, amongst an army of others far too numerous to mention here sadly.

Which of the earth’s human creation, has shown the obvious love of humanity and this planet? Which of the Earth’s human creation has given the most to humanity? Who upon this Earth, has invented more, painted more, written more poetically about the wonders of life? Where is the equal, anywhere, anytime in history to the sounds of the Lyre, the Harp, and the violin? There are no equals, you, the white Nationalist, the lone fighter, the one of many, the aged, the young, the genetic gold dust of creation, you, are too valuable to be crushed into the dry, barren earth by those who have only created a hell on earth, and a future darker than the deepest, blackest, coldest cave. Our kind is a diamond amongst coal dust… and they want that diamond.

Only we can provide the natural Rhythm (Greek rhythmos) to heal the world and bring it back to it’s natural order. Only you the reader, can control the future of our kind, and refresh the music of poetic justice, love, and beauty. We are few, but it does not take an orchestra to soothe the angry beast.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

In the last few days a lot of rumours have been circulating about the financial problems of the British National Party and some are claiming that the BNP is bankrupt.

Anyone with a little of common sense knows that all the other parties have the same problem, but the MSM prefer to ignore them and concentrate on the BNP.

The Independent on Sunday reports that the Liberal Democrats, after they had to stomach a coalition deal with the Tories are now forcing members to swallow a 15 per cent rise in membership fees to raise £100,000 for an electoral fightback.

The party’s federal executive warns that entering government has triggered “new financial challenges”. A senior party source said failure to retain the “Short” money paid to opposition parties was a “major cock-up” of the coalition negotiations. “The party faces considerable financial difficulties in the coming year unless it attracts one or two major donors,” the source added.

Some 20 staff were laid off from the party’s HQ after the election, while an emergency conference to rubber-stamp the coalition deal cost more than £100,000. With polls showing a major slump in Lib Dem support, officials fear a bloodbath at elections to the Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament and local councils next May.

Under the fundraising plan, the recommended annual subscription will hit £60 – up from £52.

Electoral Commission figures show the Lib Dems received £6.4m in 2009 but spent £6.6m. Their Tory partners spent £37.1m.

It would be interesting to find out how a party like the Lib Dems with so many rich supporters finds itself in financial difficulty.

Any hint of financial irregularities?

Even if there are some, the Electoral Commission will close both eyes, because after all only the BNP must be put under the microscope.

It’s curious that membership of the Lib-Dem is double that of the BNP.

Maybe it’s because of their reputation as an adolescent-lovers party, after all if you can afford to pay a rent-boy you can surely pay a hefty membership fee.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Only a few months ago the British National Party was alone in exposing the grooming of white British children for sex by Asian (Muslim) gangs.

Not only have we been accused of inciting racial hatred but our Chairman Nick Griffin was arrested and prosecuted twice when he talked about this problem for the first time.

It’s a sign that our hard work is yielding results. The Independent on Sunday (IoS) printed an article ( below) about this topic.

Posing for her first school photograph, Joanne was like any other girl at the age of five. She loved drawing and painting, and her favourite game was to play hide-and-seek in the woods near her home in Leeds with her five siblings. As she grew, Joanne liked to hang around, chatting and laughing with friends. But soon after she turned 12, while out playing, she met a gang of men who were to become her pimps. They took advantage of her freedom, gained her trust and prepared to abuse her.

In the beginning, the men who befriended her had seemed nice enough: they showered her with compliments, bought her a phone, and one of them – a 42-year-old married man – became her “boyfriend”. Within a year, she was forced into prostitution.

By the time she was 16, Joanne would disappear from the family home for weeks at a time. She was transported between Manchester, Rochdale, Bradford and countless other towns, locked into rooms and made to have sex repeatedly with men for money – not that she saw any of it.

Joanne is only one of many young women who have been subjected to such horrific ordeals across the UK. She is the victim of sex trafficking with a twist: not women brought in illegally from abroad and forced into prostitution, but British born. Targeted on estates throughout the country, they are passed from gang to gang, and work from town to town.

Yet the information on the trafficking of young people for sex within Britain is so scant that experts say the first official figures confirming the trade – seen by The Independent on Sunday – are just “the very, very tip of the iceberg”. Figures from the UK Human Trafficking Centre for April 2009 to March 2010 show only 38 Britons were registered as victims. This comes after a snapshot survey by the children’s charity Barnardo’s revealed it worked with 609 sexually exploited children last year, of whom 90 appeared to have been trafficked within the UK.

The victims, unlike women coerced or tricked into coming into the UK from overseas, frequently have family and friends who are reduced to despair by what is happening. Joanne’s mother, Christine, who was bringing up six children on her own, tried to protect her daughter, but the situation quickly spiralled out of her control.

“More than once I locked her in. She nearly broke her neck jumping out of upstairs windows,” she recalls. Joanne fought her mother to get out of the house, giving her a black eye.

Before long, what had been flattery turned into violence. Joanne was called on the phone she had been given and was forced to leave the house at all hours to have sex with men. If she didn’t do what was wanted. they threatened to hurt her and her family. “They brainwash these girls,” her mother says. “A friend said to me ‘it’s like she’d been hypnotised’. That phone triggered something, and she’d got to respond.”

Her mother says her pleas to police and social services fell on deaf ears. “I used to say: ‘When are you going to do something?’ They’d say they couldn’t do anything unless she complains, but when do you decide that a child has to complain? They said they could do nothing. She was 13. I’d take down the number plates of cars as they drove away, but the police wouldn’t accept them.”

The IoS is withholding certain details of the identity of the mother and daughter to protect the family.

Campaigners say most victims are aged between 12 and 16, groomed by men to provide sex. Young men and women are typically targeted by one person, who wins their trust before pimping them to others and forcibly transporting them around Britain.

The case in court last month of a 14-year-old girl who disappeared from her home in Manchester after she was offered drugs and alcohol to groom her for sex is typical of the abuse experienced by these victims. Nine men were convicted of sexual crimes – though not for trafficking – and each was sentenced to jail terms ranging from eight months to seven years.

There has still not been one prosecution for trafficking Britons within the UK. And, despite mounting evidence of the scourge, a police report into trafficking to be released this week, called Project Acumen, chose not to assess the scale of trafficking of British nationals. Of the British women they did interview, they decided none exhibited “the dimensions of the trafficking definition”.

Chief Superintendent Tony Blockley, head of crime at Derbyshire constabulary, tells a different story. He says: “We’ve always thought of this as a problem that comes from overseas, whereas this is actually happening on our doorsteps. The scale of it is enormous; Derby isn’t a hotbed of this – it’s just one town that’s decided to look at this as a problem.

“This is a new area of policing for us. As soon as you lift the stone up, you start to find things, but people weren’t lifting up the stone before. These are the kids that slip under the radar. Victims come from chaotic backgrounds; they are often in children’s homes. As they get more involved in the network, the grooming lessens and the abuse increases.”

After a year of being abused, Joanne started to lash out. “Virtually overnight she became someone we couldn’t even recognise,” says Christine. “Her attitude changed and she started to get really distant. After a while she got violent towards her siblings and me.”

Social services said she could no longer live in the same place and put her into foster care. The downward spiral accelerated. At 16, Joanne had been missing for seven weeks. “I took social services to court as they said they didn’t have a duty of care,” says Christine. “The judge said they did, and the next day she was found, locked in a house with an Asian man, with the door handle taken off.”

The gang that subjected her to this ordeal was Asian. The issue of alleged grooming of white teenage girls by Asian gangs is highly contentious. When the former Labour MP Ann Cryer said that Asian men were targeting white girls, she was accused of racism. With scant research available, there is no evidence that perpetrators or victims predominate from any one race.

Joanne, because she is now 18, is no longer of any interest to her former pimp, says her mother. The teenager is mentally scarred, homeless and drug addicted. “She’s not a child any more, so they’re not interested. They’ve used her up and thrown her out. One of them said to her: ‘In five years’ time you’ll be a crackhead out on the street and I’ll be cruising with another 14-year-old.’ Five years down the line, she is on drugs, on the streets. He – like he told her – is cruising with another 14-year-old.”

Sheila Taylor, chair of the National Working Group for Sexually Exploited Children and Young People, said: “What we’re seeing is the tip of the iceberg. This is happening in all cities and many towns. There has been no prosecution of those who sexually exploit children with trafficking legislation.”

Like many parents of victims, Christine is frustrated that the issue has continued to be ignored. “They’ve known about this happening on my estate for a long time. It’s not being dealt with because it’s such a big issue. If you acknowledge that it goes on you have to do something and they probably think they wouldn’t be able to cope with the sheer numbers.”

Nationalists will have noticed how the IoS did its best to minimise the fact that the people involved in this evil crime are mainly Asian Muslims that shouldn’t be in the country in the first place.

Unfortunately this fact is becoming more and more difficult to deny also for the unwashed leftist of the IoS.

Indeed they are caught between a rock and an hard place.

On the one hand reporting, this story is at odds with their promotion of diversity and multiculturalism but, on the other hand, ignoring it can only boost our support as people can clearly see that we are the only party willing to talk abort this problem.

And who could have believed only a few months ago that a newspaper like the IoS would report a story like that?

Very few, if any.

This is another victory for the BNP, even though we failed to get an MP elected it has never been so influential.

No wonder they are trying to bankrupt and destroy us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Tim Heydon on Green Arrow

Political Correctness Must tend towards Tyranny.

A Politically Correct Regime has an inbuilt tendency seen in our own country, to creep towards full-on dictatorship. That is because the equality of outcomes for which it searches is unattainable, except by dint of reducing populations to the status of slaves or dehumanised, empty shells.

PC is founded on Nothingness

What is being addressed here are the moral foundations of Political Correctness which lead to this oppression. Because Political Correctness is fundamentally a moral system. When it speaks of the need for ‘equality,’ of ‘social justice,’ of ‘fairness,’ of the ‘wrongness’ of ‘oppression,’ etc, it is articulating moral positions.

The question immediately arises: On what is this morality based? Where do the politically correct concepts of ‘justice’ or ‘fairness’ etc come from? Why is it necessary to be ‘equal’ at all costs’? Why shouldn’t one group, however its members define themselves, ‘oppress’ another in the terms as used by PC, if it has the inclination and ability to do so? In other words, what is the origin of the ‘ought’ in ‘we ought to be Politically Correct’ ?

Political Correctness is Self-Refuting

The devastating answer seems to be that, if one takes Political Correctness at its own valuation when it says that there is no reality other than the reality we construct for ourselves – the idea which is the root of multiculturalism and all the other manifestations of ‘Equality’ as defined by Political Correctness – then there is no ‘ought ‘ about Political Correctness. The ethics of Political Correctness also come from nowhere. They too are merely a human construct with no foundation in anything. P.C. concepts of ‘Equality,’ Social ‘Fairness,’ ‘Justice’ etc. have no more value than any other ethical system. They are merely a set of preferences of a particular group which it imposes because it has the power to do so. By its own logic Political Correctness has no right to set itself up as having any intrinsic moral force or of being superior to anything.

Political Correctness can be based on Human Worth and Reason ?

Immanuel Kant

A supporter of Political Correctness might then take another tack. ‘It is not necessary to show that it has any foundation other than the Reason, which exists in the Human Mind. Political Correctness approaches Immanuel Kant’s ideal of ethics based on Reason which in turn is founded on an appreciation of intrinsic Human Worth, more closely than any other system.’

Immanuel Kant and Human Worth

But here is what Kant had to say about Human Worth:-

‘These, therefore, are not merely subjective ends whose existence has a worth for us as an effect of our action, but objective ends, that is, things whose existence is an end in itself; an end moreover for which no other can be substituted, which they should subserve merely as means, for otherwise nothing whatever would possess absolute worth; but if all worth were conditioned and therefore contingent, then there would be no supreme practical principle of reason whatever. (Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals,)

This appears to be Kant’s argument:

Something must have absolute worth
1.If man does not have absolute worth, then nothing has absolute worth.
2.Therefore, man has absolute worth.
3.But why must something have absolute worth?
Kant’s reliance on Reason fails because Reason cannot answer this question. So the Politically Correct cannot rely on Kant and Reason / Human Worth to get themselves out of the bind that their ideology is self-refuting.

(Incidentally, the fact that there is nothing intrinsic about the worth of Human Beings means that that ‘Human Rights,’ so –called, are based on nothing whatsoever).

It Taps into Human Nature?

Ah!’ Our by now somewhat desperate supporter of Political Correctness might say, ‘but even if Political Correctness is a free –floating system like the others, it should nevertheless be supported over the others because it taps into the intuitive human need for fairness and justice more satisfactorily than they do. And since it is intuitive, we need not rely on Reason, or anything else.’‘

Morality is not Necessarily merely the Imposition of Power Elites

But hang on, putting aside the easily refuted assertion that Political Correctness is ‘fairer’ than other systems, doesn’t the assumption that normal human beings ‘intuit’ such things as fairness and justice simply imply that ethical systems are not necessarily constructed out of nothing by power elites for self-serving purposes, which is pretty much the neo-Marxist, Politically Correct position ?

‘Well yes, I suppose it does….’

Universally Occurring Wells of Morality Point to an Objective Standard

And again, if normal human beings have these universally occurring ethical wells, does this not deny the Politically Correct position that there is no objective standard by which one set of ethics may be judged against another? Doesn’t this then mean that one culture or one set of actions on the part of an individual can be morally superior to another and so the basis of unfettered individualism and multiculturalism is false?

‘Yeeeesss. If you put it like that it certainly seems to……’

The Knowledge of Good and Evil

But consider this. A man (or woman) may have conflicting natural feelings, the products of our evolution as social animals. For example, the need to save a drowning person on the one hand and the need to get himself or herself out of danger on the other. Where does the knowledge come from (which the individual may choose to ignore) that tells that individual that there is an overriding imperative, a sense of ‘ought,’ to try to save the drowning person regardless of increased danger to himself and his genes?

In other words, what is the origin of our knowledge of what is right and what is wrong? It was this knowledge which quite recently condemned two Community Officers who failed to attempt to rescue a child drowning in a Pond because (they claimed) they hadn’t received the necessary training.

‘Umm…Well, if there is such a knowledge, it’s probably just our Christian culture kicking in…..?’

But where did Christianity get it from and why is there widespread recognition that Christianity brings truth in this regard much more clearly than any other religion or philosophy? A recognition which helps to explain the historic growth of this religion and its world-historical influence?

Baffling, but it Works?

‘But,’ our Politically Correct interlocutor, by now almost at his wits’ end, might go on, desperate to avoid the apparently inevitable conclusion of the origin of our moral knowledge since this would completely obliterate the PC idea that ethics are the invention of power elites, ‘even if Political Correctness as an ethical system has by its own logic no more intrinsic worth than the ethical systems which it claims are inventions and ‘oppressive’ etc; even if it cannot rely on Reason and intrinsic Human Worth to justify itself; even if it denies itself again and again when it claims validation by intuition, shouldn’t it still be supported? Because by getting rid of ‘privileges’ of family, race, sexuality, religion and culture it produces a society which simply works better than those which are constructed on those lines in that it is more conducive to human flourishing?’

No it Doesn’t

If we accept that human flourishing is a valid criterion by which to judge whether or not one course of action is to be preferred over another, the truth as we are seeing all around us is that it is exactly that which Political Correctness doesn’t encourage. By a host of measurable indicators, it is a disaster to the well-working of our society and the flourishing of its people, as visitors to this site ( Green Arrow) are well aware.

‘What Works’ as a policy is mere practicality with no sense of ultimate, inescapable obligation about it. That is why more and more in our morally relativistic society, people feel no need to conduct themselves in what once would have been considered a moral fashion, if they can get away with it. This attitude is tending to corrupt our society at every level and in every respect. It is bringing about the end of what was most civilised about Britain. In 1940 the leftist writer George Orwell wrote that, ‘The gentleness of English Civilisation is its most marked characteristic.’ Thanks in large measure to the malign effects of what we now call Political Correctness, no such claim could possibly be made about the amoral, atomised, violent, selfish and racially, religiously and culturally divided place that is Britain today.

Political Correctness: A Fraud and a Disaster which does not work

Political Correctness is responsible for much of the moral decline and social disintegration of this country. It is the underpinning of the multiculturalism and multiracialism which has so much heightened these trends.

It has brought these things about because it is a lie. It falsely claims a moral standing and impartiality to which it is not entitled. And because it is a lie it does not work.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The MSM are still at it, busy spreading lies to create divisions and splits inside the British National Party. Nationalists will be delighted to know that the circulation of every national newspaper suffered a year-on-year decline in July, with quality titles faring worse than tabloid and mid-markets papers.

Seven papers suffered from double-digit year-on year falls in circulation last month, according to the latest ABC print circulation figures.

The decline was most keenly felt at Guardian News & Media’s The Observer, which dropped 21.02 per cent to an average weekly circulation of 314,602 in July.

The extent of the decline amongst the qualities has been exaggerated by the fact they have been stripping out free bulk sales and overseas copies from their circulations.

The Daily Star may have recorded a year-on-year circulation fall of 4.95 per cent but its average daily sale of 843,229 was up 4.1 per cent month-on-month suggesting Richard Desmond’s decision to slash cover price by 50 per cent to just ten pence from early last month is already reaping a reward.

The Daily Star’s sister title, The Daily Star Sunday, benefited from a circulation jump of 5.07 per cent month-on-month to a weekly average of 370,032 in July.

Daily Mirror 1,242,446 (-7.28%)

Daily Record 324,229 (-5.52%)

Daily Star 843,229 (-4.95%)

The Sun 3,042,406 (-2.53%)

Daily Express 663,871 (-9.56%)

Daily Mail 2,117,839 (-2.79%)

Daily Telegraph 678,391 (-17.16%)

Financial Times 378,497 (-4.80%)

The Guardian 277,246 (-15.67%)

The Independent 183,975 (-2.67%)

The Scotsman 42,850 (-7.20%)

The Times 502,588 (-13.42%)

Daily Star Sunday 370,032 (-10.74%)

News of the World 2,890,523 (-6.88%)

Sunday Mail 388,954 (-7.19%)

Sunday Mirror 1,155,101 (-7.49%)

The People 539,692 (-9.26%)

Sunday Express 568,740 (-11.87%)

Sunday Post 325,580 (-7.96%)

The Mail on Sunday 1,954,616 (-4.23%)

Independent on Sunday 155,565 (-3.01%)

The Observer 314,602 (-21.02%)

Sunday Herald 40,069 (-1.08%)

The Sunday Telegraph 505,214 (-16.15%)

The Sunday Times 1,068,158 (-10.31%)

We have said it before, people are slowly realising that newspapers don’t print news but marxist propaganda.

This fall in circulation may not cause the closure of any of them but it will surely lead to more layoffs of useless journalists, and hopefully more financial trouble for the NUJ as fewer of them will have a job .

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Last year Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, urged Londoners to fast for a day during Ramadam so that people would have a better understanding of Islam.

And he is far from alone, Caroline Spelman claimed that the burkha empowers women who wear it, and David Cameron said that native Britons should adapt to Muslim way of life and not the other way round.

The Islamification of Britain is an exemplar of the treachery committed by our political class in peacetime.

But how tolerant are Muslim countries?

There is an enlightening story reported by Ansamed, an Italian press agency.

Unsurprisingly it has been ignored by MSM, because it would breach the NUJ guidelines and be at odds with their marxist agenda.

The procession of the Virgin Mary of Trapani, held in the parish church of La Goulette (Tunis), could not be held as scheduled due to a lack of authorisation.

The procession, which has not been held since August 15 1960 was announced during the meeting of ”Tunisia, Land of Religious Encounters and Tourism”, organised over the last few days by the Association for the Protection and Renovation of La Goulette, in collaboration with the Catholic diocese of Tunis and the Grand Rabbinate of Tunisia.

The event had been eagerly awaited by the many believers who had gathered in the parish church where the archbishop of Tunisia, Maroun Laham, said mass.

The suspension caught everyone out according to Kapitalis, the parish priest said that the non-authorisation by Tunisian authorities was a consequence of the difficulty to ”get round” a 1964 law regulating worship by the Catholic Church in Tunisia.

In the words of Don Llambrich wrote Kapitalis, it is important for Christians and foreigners to fully comply with ”the rules established by the Tunisian Republic if we want to continue worshipping without restrictions.”

Do we in the UK have the right to make laws regulating worship by Muslims or any other religions?

Of course not because the ‘establishment’ would condemn it as abhorrent, and an example of religious and racial intolerance.

But the fact that a country like Tunisia has a law denied to us is not that surprising because we all know there is one law for them and another law for us.

Interestingly Tunisia is not a country one would associate with radical Islam, more of moderate Islam, but it demonstrates once again that Islam and democracy are incompatible.

I do not blame Tunisia for their stand, actually they should be praised for preserving their identity and I am more happy with that.

However, if Tunisia feels they have the right to deny authorization for a procession, we should have the right to decide what Muslim festivals should or should not be allowed, and force them to ask permission.

I believe it is time we learned from Tunisia and fought back, one way to do this is to present a motion at the next BNP conference calling for the introduction of a similar law to regulate worship by Muslims.

After all no one is accusing the Tunisians of xenophobia and religious intolerance are they?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

A few months ago we reported on the plan to make Bristol the asylum capital of Britain.

Anyone familiar with the city knows only too well that a huge number of Somalians have been allowed to move there, so that in some quarters native Britons are already a minority.

As usual no one asked the Bristolians if they wanted their city to be enriched, and anyone who dares oppose this plan is branded racist..

Those immigrants are mostly asylum ‘seekers’ or a better description, asylum scroungers that should not have been allowed entry to Britain in the first place as we have no obligation under international law to accept them.

The effects of this enrichment were laid bare by a story reported in the Evening Post about a failed asylum seeker who stalked a 76-year-old grandmother, beat her to the ground, broke her hip and stole her bag – because he did not have enough money for cigarettes.

Abdihamid Omar watched Barbara Newell leave a post office in Lawrence Hill, followed her for 20 minutes and then attacked her from behind, a court heard.

He grabbed her around her throat, kneed her in the back of her leg and pulled at her bag, sending her sprawling to the ground where she broke her hip, repeatedly hitting her arm and calling her a bitch.

Then he bent back the fingers of the 5ft tall pensioner’s hand to make her let go of her bag, containing £36.

Mrs Newell, a widow for 25 years from Redfield, was left with a fractured hip, which had to be replaced, and suffered a heart attack following her ordeal. She feared she was going to die.

Today her family described Omar as “vermin” and called for him to be deported.

Their call was backed by MPs, who said his permission to stay in the UK should be reconsidered.

Bristol Crown Court heard yesterday that Omar had left his native Somalia, was refused asylum but granted Indefinite Leave to Remain, also known as permanent residence.

The 35-year-old, of Haviland House, Lamb Street, St Jude’s, pleaded guilty to robbery.

The court heard he tested positive for cocaine after his arrest but denied using anything other than Khat, an amphetamine- like drug which is chewed.

Jailing him for five years, Judge Michael Roach told him: “I regard this offence as thoroughly nasty and mean.”

Mrs Newell’s son Paul, 49, an HGV driver from Bristol, told the Evening Post: “He should have got at least eight years. I went to pick my mother up today but she is absolutely heartbroken. She wanted to leave the flat but she couldn’t face him. You don’t give in to vermin like that.”

The court heard Omar was captured on CCTV on July 10 both at the post office and running off with Mrs Newell’s bag.

Rodney Wilson, defending, said his client was a devout Muslim (but then it is a ‘religion of peace of course), married with a child and another on the way (Cuckoos?), who was a singer looked up to by youngsters in his community. He said on the day in question his wife and child had gone to London, he went to the cashpoint and only had £6.

Mr Wilson said that after being told he could not use his card in the shop, Omar “went outside, he turned right and sat at the bus stop thinking how he could get some money”.

“He saw a lady leave and go to the left and he decided that he would steal her bag.”

Mrs Newell’s daughter Rosina, 53, a shopworker from St Anne’s, said: “I hope he gets deported. He took away her dignity.”

Indefinite Leave to Remain can lead to British citizenship but can also be revoked if someone granted it then commits a serious offence.

Stephen Williams, Lib Dem MP for Bristol West, which includes Lawrence Hill, said: “Those who have been given the full protection of the British state have an obligation to be law abiding citizens and those who abuse our hospitality should have the full force of the law against them and be returned to their country of origin, if possible.” (yeah I can see that happening! weasel words these…”if possible”)

Mr Williams obviously believes that voters are thick like the UAF thugs that his party support and love so very much.

He knows very well that under European law no one can be deported if he/she can prove that going back to his/her home country his/her life would be in danger.

And what is the position of the Dim-Lemons on that matter?

And what is their position on immigration?

We know the answer, further comment is not needed.

The only positive aspect of this story is that maybe more people in Bristol will support the BNP when they realise we have been right all along.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

While antifascists are spreading lies about the British National Party in order to demoralise BNP activists, our hardworking officers are busy creating links with nationalist parties all over the world.
Photo courtesy of Bertie… sorry Bert:(

A few weeks ago we reported that Nick Griffin was appointed Vice-President of the Alliance of European National Movements, a new pan-European nationalist party.

Well, nationalists will no doubt be delighted to hear that in the next few days nationalist parties from all over the world will hold their first ever conference in Japan with the intention of building a worldwide alliance between them.

The dream of all nationalists is coming true, this is an article in the Daily Telegraph about the conference.

The three-day gathering, which is the first of its kind, is being organised by Issuikai, a Right-wing Japanese party which disputes the extent of the Nanjing massacre in China.

At least 100 representatives of far-right parties – including the BNP – from eight countries, are expected to attend the conference in Tokyo which will include a tour of the controversial Yasukuni Shrine to more than 1,000 Second World War criminals.

Jean-Marie Le Pen, the leader of France’s National Front, is due to make a key-note speech at the conference on Friday.

It comes as fears over the growing popularity of European Right-wing groups increase following gains in national elections and the European Election of last year.

The Alliance of European National Movements, the coalition of Europe’s Far-Right parties is sending 20 delegates to the Future of Nationalist Movements conference.

Bruno Gollnisch MEP, the vice-president of France’s Front National, is expected to attend along with members of Hungary’s Jobbik party, which recently won 17 per cent in the country’s general election, Vlaams Belang from Belgium, Portugal’s Partido Nacional, and Italy’s Fiamma Tricolore.

Adam Walker, a high-ranking member of the BNP who was accused of calling immigrants “savage animals” when he worked as a teacher, is representing the British National Party.

Issuikai is covering the delegates’ accommodation, local transport, and food costs but those attending are to fund their own return flights to Japan, which often cost up to £1,000.

MEPs are entitled to a personal travel allowance outside their member country of up to 4,000 euros a year and many are thought to be using some of the money to fly to the conference.

Timothy Kirkhope MEP, Leader of the Conservatives in the bloc called for the European Parliament’s auditors to investigate.

Matthew Elliot, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “This is yet another example of MEPs abusing expenses. It would be a disgrace for British taxpayers’ money to be used to fund MEP’s travel to a conference which is in part organised by a group that denies war crimes such as the Nanjing Massacre.

“Any money MEPs receive should be subject to more scrutiny and they should be more accountable to those who pay their salaries and expenses, they should not have free rein to use taxpayers’ money to propagate abhorrent views like those of Issuikai.”

Unsurprisingly the article is quite negative and full of lies.

Anyone who is familiar with Japanese politics will confirm that is not unusual for Japanese Prime Ministers to pay a visit to Yasukuni Shrine and that Issuikai’ views are shared by politicians from the main parties.

Indeed the Japanese attitude to its past is a sore point in international relations, South Korea and China regularly complain that Japanese politicians still refuse to accept responsibility for atrocities committed in the past.

And by the way how can the Daily Telegraph claim to hold the moral high ground in judging us when it condones the murder of several thousand Muslims in the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?

We know the answer, don’t we?

As for Adam Walker going to Japan this is not really surprising.

Not only Mr Walker is married to a Japanese girl but he has lived in Japan and has first hand experience of what it means to live in a country which puts the interests of its own people first.

As a former teacher Mr Walker was amazed by the efficiency of their education system, where schools are staffed with qualified teachers who are there to teach and not to indoctrinate, where exams are tough in order to make sure only the best can pass and where strict discipline and corporal punishment force unruly students to behave.

Whatever the outcome of this conference, the fact that such a gathering is taking place is a positive sign that the battle to stop the new world order has already begun and luckily we can stop this globalist plan before it’s too late.

* Here there is a link to learn more about Issuikai:

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20030520b2.html

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

ed: Adam Walker pic courtesy of BertieBert. Sorry Bert:(

Share this post:

Hide Sites