Never before in the history of the British National Party started in 1982 has the expression ‘playing by the rules’ been so relevant. In the heat of politics, people very often forget that, regardless of personal views, we must always stick to fairplay and proper behaviour. The Romans had another expression: Res, Non Verba (Facts, Not Words). When we face the courts of justice and the courts of public opinion we must remember that there are many rules that we might unwittingly ignore, sometimes simply because we are not forcefully aware of the entire legal framework. Whatever justifications we might think that we have, the said justifications could even work against us. Sometimes remorse or publicly expressed regret can be used as evidence of guilt and wrongdoing.

When I joined the British National Party almost ten years ago, I made a conscious decision to play by the rules. I was painfully aware of the fact that individual weaknesses can lead to the demise of an entire organization. During the recent nomination process for the leadership election, I stood outside the said process with the aim of being absolutely impartial to protect something that is more precious than any individual political ambitions. Before all individual political ambitions, the British National Party comes first because without a British National Party our hopes and aspirations would be dead in the water.

I do not criticize any of my fellow party members. They all had their own individuals reasons, their own individual justifications, to do what they did and to adopt the positions they have adopted. But, as I have stated before, reasons and justifications come a cropper when confronted with facts that contradict them. So this is a time to be reasonable and to be patient for, in the end, facts will speak for themselves. After the Storm, we will have to pick up the pieces to continue fighting for what we believe.

I have also become aware of the fact that personal circumstances, very private circumstances, are stopping some of our peoples from performing to the best of their abilities. When things go right, we all congratulate ourselves. When things go wrong, it is the time for understanding and it is the time to redouble our efforts to keep the family together.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

One of the arguments used by the antifascists to deter people voting BNP is to deliver smear leaflets accusing BNP councillors of being useless, ineffective and failing to attend meetings.

Nationalists know that there are BNP councillors that are hardworking but the MSM never say a word about them as this would be against the NUJ guidelines.

Luckily most councils have a copy of the annual report on their website and everyone can see how many meetings a councillor actually attended in a given local authority.

In Morley Town Council BNP councillor Joanna Beverley has the best record attendance as she went to all the council meetings.

However what is interesting about this local authority is that the councillors that regularly attack Mrs Beverley have such a poor attendance record.

Morley Borough Independent councillors Richard and Helen Benson were the very worst of a bad MBI bunch. The pair failed to attend a single Council meeting, and only managed to avoid being booted off the council due to non-attendance by dragging themselves along to a few committee meetings. In the case of Richard Benson, this meant attending 2 out of 14 meetings of the Finance and General Purposes Committee.

Helen Benson attended one out of the 10 meetings of the Morley Entertainments Sub-Committee and 2 of the 14 meetings of the Community Development Committee.

The combined Benson attendance at committee or council meetings for the 2009-10 year was a laughable 9.6%.

Fellow MBI Party councillors Mary Hicks and Judith Elliott also attended less than half of the council meetings held, and for many of Morley’s ‘independents’ things got even worse at committee level.

Judith Elliott, for example, managed to turn up to a single meeting of the Civic Duties Sub-Committee, and missed the other eleven. Terence Grayshon attended two out of fourteen Community Development Committee meetings and failed to attend a single one of the ten meetings of the Morley Entertainments Sub-Committee.

Nationalists can look at the link below to find out more:

Morley Patriot

Well done to Joanna Beverley let’s hope voters take notice and re-elect her.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Director General of the BBC has come out and said that the BBC ‘used to be biased towards the left’ but that ‘the BBC has changed.’ Mmm…. mmm… and more mmm… I worked for the BBC from 1989 until 1994 and believe me that they are still extremely selective regarding how they choose to cover stories and the stories they choose to cover. Fortunately, in view of the present financial environment, they might be forced to change.

Even when they try and imitate private mass media, they still come a cropper. They failed to capitalize on massive amounts of money given by British taxpayers and now they face a backlash when practically every branch of the public sector is facing cuts of not less than 25%. Worried about the License Fee? Is this what has caused this sudden show of mea culpa?

When it comes to political coverage, we have been forced to swallow orchestrated and manipulated interviews ‘with members of the public that were casually passing by.’  Watching much of the said coverage I was constanly reminded of the propaganda campaign of the Communist Party in China, talking about how beautiful everything was when people were being shot at Tian-an-men Square, about marvellous architecture when in rural areas people were starving to death and you had to gather several people to have a mouth with the right number of teeth.

It is like a scene of the novel Candide of Voltaire, a scene where both Candide and Dr. Pangloss are about to be killed. Candide cries and cries, but Dr. Pangloss says that everything is fine and nothing could be better. I am fed up of the BBC’s ideological optimism and of the equally ideological manipulated rejection of those who do not share their views of the World.

I do not want a BBC attached to any ideology or any political party or any vested interest. I want a BBC able to deliver the truth, all the truth and nothing but the truth. The BBC is not a Church. They shouldn’t be telling us what we should believe or what we shouldn’t believe.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Four Israelis were killed in the West Bank, including a pregnant woman, and Palestinian crowds celebrated and congratulated themselves for the assassinations. This happened at the same time when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is in the United States trying to reach a peace agreement.

We must remember that the Unbekannte Lebewessen who carried out the assassinations and those who celebrated in the streets live amongst us in the United Kingdom.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We did not say it. Tony Blair said it. The Labour leader that won the 1997 General Election for the Labour Party after 18 years of a Conservative Government openly described Brown as a disaster that led to the demise of the Labour Administration.

Now, at least two close allies of Gordon Brown – Ed Milliband and Ed Balls, two openly Brownites politians – are striving to become leaders of the Labour Party. One speaks like a man who is still chewing the food is his mouth and the other is known as a square headed bully who very seldom or never apologizes. Although the shortened version of their names is usually given to horses, the said shortened name would be in these cases more approppriate for mules. Before you get carried away, I must apologize to horses and mules, animals that - unlike Brown, Miliband and Balls – should not be accused of any wrongdoing.  

What do Ed Miliband and Balls want? They want to bring back Old Labour, the very same Old Labour Party totally dominated by Trade Unions run by bullies that were constantly threatening to paralize the country. On Wednesday, the delivery of the Labour ballots will begin.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We all know that the establishment puts an enormous amount of effort into destroying the British National Party.

Thus far they have failed, but they will not give up.

We are the only party prepared to address issues that affect a large part of the electorate, one of these issues is housing.

Anyone on the waiting list for council accommodation is well aware that immigrants and asylum seekers are not only at the front of the queue but get the newest and best houses and flats.

The government has not only denied this, but accuses us of incitement to racial hatred for exposing a scandal that has been widely known for a long time.

it seems our efforts are beginning to pay off as the Daily Express reports that town hall chiefs will be given more freedom to put British-born families ahead of immigrants in the queue for council houses under new Government proposals to be unveiled this autumn.

Ministers want local authorities to ease the growing resentment among many white working class voters that newcomers are getting preferential treatment.

They want “local connections” to count in applications for social housing rather than handing out homes simply on the basis of need.

But the plan goes directly against multi-cultural equality programmes that were promoted under Labour, and it is likely to be resisted by many Labour-run councils.

Tory Housing Minister Grant Shapps yesterday acknowledged current rules for allocating social homes were breeding resentment.

He said: “It causes a great deal of concern and is very problematic for social cohesion when people find they aren’t provided with any preference when they are actually in the area they have lived in for a very long time.”

He said councils will be expected to take into account “the desire of local people” when drawing up their housing policies.

Mr Shapps added: “We plan to provide more flexibility to local authorities to judge the proper criteria for the waiting list. Apart from a limited number of prescribed cases — homelessness, for example — there should be the flexibility to write your own housing allocation criteria.”

Resentment over council housing is credited with boosting support in deprived areas for ‘extreme-Right’ organisations such as the British National Party. Recent research suggests that more than one in 10 of the country’s 3.5 million social homes goes to immigrants.

And more than £230million of taxpayers’ money is spent every year providing homes for asylum seekers. Under present rules, councils are expected to allocate council houses on the basis of need. The result is that the homeless, the elderly and families with many children living in cramped conditions tend to come first.

This means that immigrant families, which are frequently larger than their British-born counterparts may take precedence in the queue.

Around five million applicants across the country are currently on the waiting list. The rules state that immigrants must be settled in the UK, or come from an EU country to qualify for housing.
Councillor Edward Lister, Conservative leader of Wandsworth Council in south London said: “If the housing allocation rules are going to be changed, we would welcome that. We want to give a measure of priority to local residents. It builds stability in the community and keeps families together.”

We will wait to see if this proposal becomes law as this coalition government cannot be trusted to return all five of your fingers if you shake hands with them.

There is no doubt that a change in the criteria for allocation of council accommodation is long overdue.

Even if (a bloody big if) there is a sensible case for mass immigration, it doesn’t mean that these newcomers should get council housing as this undermines the weak argument about the (supposedly) economic benefit of mass immigration.

It is not a coincidence that the present and previous governments, rather than trying to defend the indefensible, denied that such discrimination was taking place and accused us of telling lies.

Unfortunately for them the huge number of indigenous Britons on the waiting list for housing means there are the same number of potential BNP supporters, and no amount of smear campaigns will convince the people they can trust the Lib Con alliance. This is why Labour Barking MP Margaret Hodge, a couple of months ago who told BNP activists to “pack up and leave”, wrote an article in the Daily Telegraph claiming that the ‘far-right’ can be defeated for good only if long term residents get priority in the assigning of council houses and benefits.
Hmmmmmm, I think she knows her goose is cooked if this “local connection” law is not passed.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

None other than Peter Mandelson raised the alert about the return to Rabies Labour characterized by Clause Four Block Voting. Those who were around when Tony Blair was trying to get Labour elected remember the efforts of John Prescott as mediator to get rid of Clause Four, a mechanism that ensured that Trade Union leaders could exercise unlimited power to force workers to go on strike.

The danger is all too real. In the public sector – before budget cuts – trade union membership is still about 57%. A return to Old Labour could literally paralize the public sector. Such state of affairs would literally bring Britain to a state of total collapse at a time when the foreseen cuts are considered to be the only way to maintain Britain’s financial stability.

City experts have said that public debt bonds are already oversubscribed and any doubts about Britain’s capability to honour payments of its public debt would lead to loss of credibility similar to the loss of credibility suffered by countries like Greece.

Perhaps the remarks of the Deputy Governor of the Bank of England Charles Bean regarding the will of the Bank of England to use ’all its powers’ in case of yet another financial crisis have been very appropriate considering the circumstances that Trade Union MadDogs could create.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As the prices of family daily food shopping baskets rise and rise amid fears of hundreds of thousands of job losses, the Deputy Governor of the Bank of England, Charles Bean,  indicates that the institution will use ‘all powers’ if there is another banking crisis.

The ‘printing money’ process known as quatitative easing will continue despite the danger of a boomerang effect regarding the parities of the pound compared to other currencies. The value of the pound is a sensitive issue since the cost of energy related inputs rises when the pound goes down.

When many of the big players are already state owned, one wonders about what the said ‘all powers’ would do should there be another financial crisis, especially taking into account that from October 2010 we will see the implementation of budget cuts that in some cases will be of not less than 40 per cent. This time it will be the Treasury that will need additional ‘quantitative easing’ to keep jobs in the public sector.

The British Government would feel the temptation of applying a recipe used by some English Kings of ‘cutting down the gold content of coins’ to pretend that they had more money available than they actually had.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Right at the beginning of Ramadan, Pakistani criket players stand accused of ‘selling themselves’ by fooling around with balls. Since the Koranic Justice dictates about ’cutting body parts’ sentences, I wonder what would be in place when cricket players are linked to dubious affairs involving balls.

If the accusations are proven to be true, what does this tell you about individuals who seem to be completely oblivious to the sufferings of their own people affected by floods, hunger and illnesses?

What to say then about the spitting Pakistani camels living in East London and those who go around beating journalists for trying to investigate electoral fraud? Are they true Muslims? Do they all belong to the same Club?

I don’t think this kind of people do Pakistan any favours and the Pakistani Community in Britain should strive to clean up its act by getting rid of the scumbags that are putting lives in danger.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It was reported today that Russian Akula Class Submarines have been tracking British Vanguard Submarines operating from the British Naval Base in Faslane. Senior British Naval Officers fear that should the Russian Akula Submarines manage to record the acoustic signature of the Vanguard Submarines the British Nuclear Deterrent will be finished since British Submarines would be detected before they even try to launch Trident D4 nuclear missiles.

The entire Defence Structure of the UK is in doubt given projected cuts of not less than 40% and this would include Nuclear Installations in Scotland.

The Faslane Base is guarded by just 500 Marines and is notorious for cases of vandalism and breaches of the peace, drink and drug offences, serious and petty assaults, extortion and sexual crimes, all of which are the tells signs of dangerous levels of lack of discipline and professionalism.

There are also serious technical issues in terms of security and operability with rising levels of radioactive leaks. It was reported that only one of four nuclear submarines is fully operational, two have shown mechanical failures and the status of the remaining one is unknown after collisions in the English Channel and in the Red Sea.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Trade Union movement financially fed by the former Labour government is now threatening to withdraw financial support provided to the Labour Party if the Labour Party elects the Leader that they do not want.

It is short of putting somebody into concrete shoes and throwing the person into a river – one of the classic methods of the Maffia. This sort of blackmail will continue until somebody has the guts to destroy the link between Political Parties and Trade Unions. Political parties should be financed by its members and Trade Unions should support their members without getting involved in party political activities.

The link between Trade Unions and Political Parties transforms the legislation designed to regulate monies invested in political activities into a mockery. I personally asked the Electoral Commision in 2004 about the limits in terms of monies invested in political campaigning. The answers provided showed that legal regulations in this regard are an absolute shambles.

What about UAF? What about UNITE? What about the RMT? What about all the other organizations and inviduals that use charity status, donations and active campaigning to prop up the Labour Party? Are they covered by Electoral Regulations? The Welfare System  and the so called legislation for the development of Trade Union were used for political campaigning and to provide funds for the Labour Party. I would call this FRAUD with capital letters. What would you call it?

Share this post:

Hide Sites

You might believe that Queen Elizabeth II is also the Head of State of Canada. Well, she isn’t! In reality she is not the Head of State of a country whose citizens lost their lives fighting for Britain in two World Wars and other conflicts. Or is She? Well, given the way Britain treats Canadian citizens, she shouldn’t be.

An elderly gentleman who came to Britain in 1963, got married and raised his children in England where he worked for more than 40 years  and had a company employing British citizens, was treated worse than one of the enrichers that come to Britain to live at the expense of British taxpayers.

Some weeks ago, a member of his family in Canada had to undergo cancer treatment and he went to Canada for obvious reasons. When he came back to London, he was told that he no longer had the right to live in the United Kingdom.

A Canadian lady went to the Home Office to renew her visa and she was told that she had to pay not less than 500 pound (basically almost 600) to have a stamp on her passport and that after paying she had to wait not less than six weeks for the said stamp.

After these lovely experiences, I am sure that these two Canadians will have plenty to tell their friends and relatives about what a wonderful country Britain is.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

When they mention the figures – not less than 25 billion pound – you might end up thinking that the discussion is about a huge enterprise, a sort of Star Wars defense system. The reality is quite the opposite. Britain has four – yes, four – nuclear submarines of which one is totally operational,  two have some ’mechanical faults’ and the remaining-one status is in doubt.

The entire debate in Parliament, under Tony Blair, was about options and some of the options were to scrap Trident altogether, to keep Trident with three submarines instead of four with British made missiles or to keep the submarines, but use American made missiles. Whatever the options, we must add the time necessary to gather capital, manpower and expertise.

Cuts in the Defense Budget aim at achieving two major objetives: 1) to balance the books of the entire public administration and 2) to save the money that will be needed to replace Trident. This means cutting down budgets of the Air Force, the Navy and the Army. Whenever they talk about cuts, they mention aircraft carriers being built that – for starters – could only be equipped with outdated aircraft because they started building the aircraft carriers without thinking about the kind of aircraft they are going to be using. So the Navy will end up having brand new aircraft carriers with outdated aircraft or no new aircraft carriers. I am sure you are getting the picture.

Iraq and Afghanistan showed that Britain no longer has the necessary aircraft capability and Britain’s aircraft capability is going to be massively reduced in coming years. It might sound farfetched but if military capability is reduced even further Britain will not even have the power to respond in a small scale conflict in the South Atlantic.

The Conservatives started the efforts to reduce British military capability with things like the so called  ’amalgamation’ and ’mothballing’. In 1982, Britain was scarcely ready to face combat and had not been for the Harriers… Under Gordon Brown the dismantling process continued and faced with an enquiry Gordon Brown publicly stated that ‘he had not provided the exact figures’. Liam Fox has now the task of keeping whatever can be kept given the dire state of British finances.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

What is a country? A country are people who identify themselves as one Nation. They definitely need a territory to guarantee their most fundamental rights. Putting aside financial mismanagement and corruption of past administrations, what the previous administration did was to ensure the deletion of national borders in legal terms.

So now, hundreds of Britons are forcibly sent abroad at the request of foreign governments that have no obligation to explain why British citizens are being taken away and put on trial in foreign lands. As if flood immigration that totally destroys social cohesion was not enough, David Blunkett and its Labour acolytes sold the rights of British citizens.

The boundaries between what is national and what is international are blurred and immigration laws that seem to have been created by people taken from an asylum for mental patients are being applied.

America or any country of the European Union can take away British citizens without evidence of wrongdoing. If Turkey was allowed to join the European Union, anybody opposing the Muslim takeover of Britain could end up being extradited to Turkey and find himself in a Muslim Court.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Nationalists know only too well that the NUJ diktat states that, the BNP must only be presented in a negative light and if this is not possible then they must be ignored.

But thanks to the internet this soviet-style censorship doesn’t work anymore.

‘Rochdale Online’ reports that Rochdale Euro-MP Chris Davies has emerged at the head of a ‘league table’ comparing the performance of representatives in the European Parliament.

The Liberal Democrat has spoken more often, tabled more questions, and has the best attendance record of the eight MEPs who represent the North West of England.

The figures compiled by independent organisation Votewatch.eu are based on the European Parliament’s own public records since elections were held last year.

Davies has made 34 speeches in the Parliament on subjects ranging from the need to introduce sustainable fisheries policies to the situation in Middle East, but he concentrated in particular on environmental legislation.

However the news that will make nationalists happy is that the second most voluble MEP was British National Party leader Nick Griffin, who spoke 14 times during the year.

Bottom of the table was Conservative MEP Jackie Foster, who spoke on just three occasions and tabled no parliamentary questions at all.

But UKIP’s representative, Paul Nuttall, claimed the record for absenteeism, being present on just 58% of the days that the Parliament was in session.

Chris Davies said that numbers did not tell the whole story but was pleased that he had topped the table.

He said: “I’m involved in the shaping of laws that will be binding on 27 countries. A lot of work goes on behind the scenes but parliamentary debates do provide an opportunity to put ideas on record and to hold the European Commission to public account.

“Perhaps the UK Independence Party should learn some lessons. You can’t stand up for Britain’s interests if you are not present when votes take place.”

Mr Davies is indeed right and it also (not in so many words) says that Nick Griffin is doing a damn good job to stand up for the interests of Britain and the British, in spite of the huge pressure put on him by the establishment.

Let’s hope that Mr Griffin’ hard work will convince more UKIP voters to support the BNP, the only political party determined to get Great Britain out the EU.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The discovery of the decomposed corpse of a British spy in Pimlico, Central London, should raise a few eyebrows, but this is what happens when there is talk of re-opening enquiries about other deaths. Getting rid of loose-ends is one of the main activities of British Intelligence. Those who know too much for their own good are usually disposed of. As in other cases, there will be  ‘cooperation’ of the Intelligence Community with the Police and there will be  a sympathetic forensic expert ready to help delete any compromising evidence.

In the 1990s when the Soviet Union came to an end, the old KGB was transformed and the emphasis regarding intelligence and counter-intelligence activities changed. Originally designed as part of the so called Cold War, the KGB was replaced by FSB and other less visible agencies.

The briefing of FSB ФСБ, Федеральная служба безопасности Российской Федерации (approximate translation in English: Bureau of the Security Services of the Russian Federation) was limited to internal affairs but since 2001 FSB has been fully operational outside the Russian Federation and there are more than 3,000 FSB agents operating in the United Kingdom alone.

They documented the deaths of Dr. David Kelly and of Alexandr Litvinenko. In one case, the explanation was ‘suicide’ and in the other case Andrei Lugovoi (now member of the Russian Duma (Russian Parliament) was falsely accused by the Labour goverment). The Russian version of events is somewhat different. You should look at the links between Alexandr Litvinenko – former KGB agent – and a certain Boris Berezovski (convicted in absentia in the Russian Federation and actually living in London as a ‘refugee’).

Andrei Lugovoi, himself a member of the Russian Security Services, came to London to negotiate with Alexandr Litvinenko and offered Alexandr Litvinenko a deal that would help send Boris Berezovski back to Russia.  The death of Litvinenko helped Boris Berezovski and there are other angles of the same story.

Boris Berezovski was helping those who killed Russian soldiers in Chechnya. In fact, he would help anybody acting against Russia. For those who remember, Litvinenko is also said to have met an Italian journalist who was later found to have links with the Italian Maffia that was used as an intermediary to provide weapons and money to Chechen rebels.

Berezovski’s connection with Chechnya was obviously an embarrassment for Britain. Britain was then committed in two military conflicts in Muslim countries and given the possibility of yet another conflict involving Iran it desperately needed Russian support in the Security Council. So protecting a man involved with Muslim terrorists was ‘not benefitial’ and they moved in to ’get rid of loose ends’. 

They couldn’t get rid of Berezovski given Berezovski’s connections with former Soviet Republics. Just weeks ago, the son of former President Bakiyev of Kyrgystan came to Britain and claimed political asylum. Guess who are the solicitors helping Bakiyev in Britain. Berezovski’s solicitors are giving Bakiyev a helping hand. But the story gets even more interesting.

The American government had signed relevant agreements with his father, then President Bakiyev, so that Kyrgystan would be a bridge for American military operations in Afghanistan and in all this Berezovski was a very useful friend and protecting ’a friend’ was of paramount importance. In order to protect Berezovski they obviously had to get rid of Litvinenko and in the scheme of things Litvinenko was a very minor player, but was still a significant liability for the Americans and for the British.

In August 2009, I travelled to Moscow where I could gather even more information about  these and other issues. The ‘suicide’ of Dr. David Kelly and the death of Alexandr Litvinenko can be linked with people operating in a certain building near the River Thames. In an interview with Russian Television, I could only disclose information relating to Kyrgystan and the Bakiyev Family but, as I said before, this is not even the tip of the iceberg.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Those who lived through the Blitz knew, better than others, that regardless of roofs and walls turned into rubble, if the foundations were right they could rebuild. We have gone through many changes and some of them have not been for the better, but I am sure that if we are able to learn we can change apparent failure into success. This is why the work done by the grass roots at branch level is so fundamentally important.

We are a marching army at war and we cannot dwell for too long on our losses. We wipe our tears and we keep going with guns blazing and if we are shot dead we will fall with our honour intact. Sooner or later, death will come to us all, but nothing can possibly be better than the feeling of having done what we had to do.

For all the talk about Human Rights and all the politically correct nonsense, there can be no more fundamental right than the right to be ourselves and to be with those who are our peers. Nations fought for their very existence and many of those that failed are now completely forgotten. Even the most peaceful Nations of today had to survive in battle because as the Romans said ‘Vis Pacem, Para Bellum’ (If you want peace, prepare yourself for war).

They celebrate the abolition of one kind of slavery, but there are many more slaveries that need to be abolished, including the slavery imposed upon us by those who want to destroy our Identity.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The news that staffing levels at rail stations are going to be reduced comes at a time when many of us have being unable to travel simply because ticket machines or gates were out of order and this on top of train delays and cancellations.

After being taxed for going to work with the so called peak time fares and having our salaries reduced for being late at work for no fault of our own, we keep having to put up with increases above the rate of inflation and now we will also have to contend with less safety at stations that in many cases have become crime spots. Why should we complain when our deaths could be recorded for posterity by CCTV cameras in non-staffed train stations?

Share this post:

Hide Sites

A television programme produced by Channel 4 and presented by Tazeen Ahmad indicates that mass immigration is leading to a massive increase in inbreading thanks to which genetic diseases are spreading like wildfire inside the Pakistani Community. A third of all children born in Britain with genetic diseases belong to the Pakistani Community.

What we are witnessing is a health disaster created by a culture that is also leading to a rising number of suicides of young women forced to marry older men just to maintain financial vested interests. Compared to what happens in other communities, the number of  cases of suicide is four times greater. Fatalities caused by family feuds are also rising although just a few are reported by the mass media.

Talking about why there has been such a low level response in terms of aid for the victims of floods in Pakistan, we shouldn’t discard the impact of the said cultural practices that undoutedly alienate other communities and transform Pakistani communities into ghettos.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Marie Stopes International is a multinational company operating in the United Kingdom under Charity status and carries out abortions not just in Britain but in many countries. Marie Stopes promoted eugenics, the set of ideas that led to the execution of those judged to be ‘less than perfect’.

It is highly surprising to hear that Kate Smurthwaite, a left-wing activitist that poses as a defender of women’s rights, came out to defend an organization whose name is linked to ideas mostly associated with Adolf Hitler.

During a debate organized by RT Russian Television, broadcast worldwide, I was astonished to hear Kate Smurthwaite support the ideas she is very obviously fond of. The reports made public today that indicate a surge of unwanted pregnancies and abortions in Britain, linked to promiscuity under the effects of alcohol, virtually contradict her assumptions about ‘choice and responsibility’. But, most importantly, it shows that – most probably due to absolute ignorance – Kate Smurthwaite is defending the indefensible.

Share this post:

Hide Sites