A by-election is to be held in Adeyfield on the 11th of March, the Hemel Gazette reports that (“useful fools”) UAF activists will to be supported by Liberal Democrat MP Richard Grayson, and he will  encourage people to vote against the “far right”  BNP.

Mr Grayson said: “I was pleased to support Unite Against Fascism’s work in Hemel.

“Members of my family were very active in the campaign against fascism in the 1930s.

“I see the campaign against the BNP as being part of that long campaign to defeat racism in this country, and fascism more widely, and I am proud to take part.”

But the BNP claims that one in three households it has visited in Adeyfield has expressed support for the controversial party.

BNP candidate Janet Price said: “About one in three of the people we have visited have been ‘yes’.

“We’ve been getting a very good response from people as we go round.

“Nobody is rude. I’m quite surprised!”

She said they were using the Electoral roll and not going to homes where the names suggested people from an ethnic minority.

“We have a list of names. We won’t go there to aggravate them. It will only cause rows and we don’t want any upset,” she said.

Concerning the campaigners and the UAF she said: “That is their prerogative. We all have our views. It’s a free country.

“We should be able to have our views without causing any hassle.”

MP Mike Penning said: “The BNP desperately need publicity and I don’t want to give them any. I want them to wither on the vine.”

A Facebook group has been started against the BNP in Dacorum and another anti racist music concert is planned.

Mr Grayson may wish to explain why the Limp- Dhims need the help of  the fascist UAF to stop us.

If he is so sure we are the Devil incarnate, he should tell people about his party policies and why they should vote for the Limp-Dhims.

The fact he needs help from a third party indicates to me that he knows the locals don’t agree with him, or his Limp-Dhim policies.

It is well known that the Limp-Dhims want deeper integration by the EU, more immigration, higher taxes, and also want to reduce the age of consent for sexual intercourse, a way to legalise paedophilia by stealth.

How many prospective Limp-Dhim voters would agree with that?

Not many I suspect.

Luckily the UAF will be out causing trouble and the people will be shown who the real fascists are.

Winston Churchill said; “The next Fascists will be the Anti Fascists.”

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Share

http://tinyurl.com/yk7rv3a

Do you suffer from pent up rage, do you find yourself annoyed or angry, are you bad tempered and short with others, do you feel uncomfortable or uneasy when strolling peacefully in London?

You probably live in Lewisham…then again it might be Lambeth, or Enfield.

According to the latest statistics, Lewisham is one of the angriest places in London, it came seventh in a survey carried out by ‘The British  Association of Anger Management’. These results are from a study which took place between January and December 2008. Lambeth was top of the league for anger, followed by Enfield.

Inability to handle anger and outrage are highlighted by ‘BAAM’ .                                                                                                                                                  The ‘BAAM’ director Mr Mike Fisher, “I believe issues such as crime, violence, road rage, addiction, eating disorders, depression and many other mental health issues all stem from our inability as a culture to handle or express our feelings, especially those of anger”                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           1) What does he mean by ‘culture’, does he mean the artificial construct we have been forced to live with for the last 60 years, or does he mean the ‘culture’ that existed before the ‘multicultural’ hell that passes for ‘culture’ ?

2) I do not recall fifty years ago when we had a relatively stable society, many of us having problems with eating disorders, or the violence we experience these days, or depression, or addiction, or the myriad other imported problems that, if we were allowed to express our feelings without fear of recrimination, would be laid firmly at the door of the traitors that have led us by the nose down the ‘Road to Perdition’.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          I am deliberate in my choice of words in the last sentence, the idea that we must refrain from commenting about how we feel is the fuel that feeds the fire of resentment towards our betrayers, and so feeds the fire of Patriotism.

3) What do these Boroughs have in common?                                                                                                                                                                                                     I refer you to the previous paragraphs!!

Share

These days, regrettably, I find myself very much an ‘armchair artist.’ But this I mean that I often find myself toying with ideas for paintings and sculptures, but I simply lack the time for execution. Consequently, despite the inspiration, the creations never get off the drawing board.

I have friends who could fairly be described as ‘armchair’ cooks and ‘armchair’ gardeners- people who are well versed and enthusiastic about their chosen interests, but just seem to lack the application or opportunity to make their ideals become reality.

I suppose it’s a question of priorities. There just isn’t enough time to do everything we would like to do. So necessarily, some activities get relegated to the back burner. Which means in effect, that they simply never happen, despite all our good intentions.

I’m now making a direct plea to all ‘armchair nationalists.’ Those of you out there who are reading this blog, and find yourselves agreeing with most, if not all of what I say. Those of you who have ‘seen the light’- who realise the state that this poor country of ours is in, and who want to see something done about it. Those of you who can see how we have been hoodwinked by the establishment and had changes forced on us without our consent. Those who believe and know that the only party with the guts and the determination to take things forward is the British National Party.

To each and all of you, I would like you to put your hand on your heart and ask yourself, ‘Am I doing everything that I can feasibly do to help the Party, my country and the just Cause that I sincerely believe in? Or am I selling my ancestors, myself and future generations short? Am I leaving it to others to bear the burden that I should be sharing?

I confess that on some days, the demands can seem daunting. But I have always worked on the principle of ‘no regrets.’ By this, I simply mean that at the end of the day, I see myself accountable to my Cause and my conscience. So, come what may, I can always hold my head high and say, ‘I fought a good fight, I did my duty, and what’s more, I did my best.’

Success can and will be achieved. But it won’t come without a struggle. And only if everyone, yes, everyone who feels the same way gets out of their comfortable armchair and lends a hand giving or doing the best that they can. No matter how small and insignificant you feel it is, all that is needed is your best effort. No one can ever ask for more.

So, I am putting out this appeal to all like-minded folk across the nation, from Land’s End to John O’Groats and even beyond! In these days of the internet, no one is too remote to make their presence felt in some way or another. Your help is needed in Barking and Dagenham and it is needed NOW! We need manpower on the streets and we need donations. We need you to show in some way that you care!

Make no mistake, the eyes of the world are fixed on Barking and Dagenham this election-tide. Because this is where our breakthrough will come. And this is also where our opponents will mass all their resources against us. The nationalists of Barking and Dagenham are doing sterling work. But we cannot stand and fight alone. We need YOU to do your bit and do your best, now!

Thank you!

Share

So it is no surprise therefore, to hear that a Chinese “enricher” who needed an interpreter because she could not speak English, went on trial for using her car to crash into her husbands, the result of an argument in Oxford.

But the real surprise during the trial was that a judge told her to learn English!!

Judge Julian Hall made the remark as he sentenced businesswoman Wei Cai for ramming her husband’s car through a fence on a busy street.

The Chinese national angered the Judge when she needed an interpreter to admit to the charges of dangerous driving, and causing damage to property.

He told the courtroom: “I shouldn’t say this but I will, I would spend the next 12 months learning English. It would make life a lot easier.”

His remarks sparked an outcry from the local Chinese community in Oxford (no surprise there then!).

One leader, who did not want to be named, said: `Dangerous driving is dangerous driving. Learning English is learning English, they are two separate things.

`There is no relationship between the two, it is illogical for him to say that and I think it could be offensive.’

Oxford Crown Court heard that Cai was rowing with her husband when she drove her powerful Audi Q7 4×4 into his Audi saloon near a parade of shops in Rose Hill on August 8 last year.

Her actions, witnessed by several pedestrians, caused extensive damage to both cars and forced the saloon up the pavement and into a fence.

Matthew Walsh, prosecuting, said: `Witnesses saw the car accelerate at speed into the saloon, hitting it with such force it caused it to mount the pavement sideways towards the corner of the road.’

He said £500 worth of damage was caused to the fence, which belonged to Lucy Spackman.

The court heard Cai, a mother-of-one, had since reconciled with her business partner husband.

She was also ordered to take an extended driving test before regaining her license. (If she did not speak English in court, how did she manage to pass the driving test, have we translated it for the Chinese by any chance?)

Judge Hall also fined her £1,000, banned her from driving for a year, and ordered her to pay costs of £500 and a £15 victim surcharge

Just a question: would a British citizen who commits a similar offence in China get an interpreter at Chinese taxpayers’ expense?

We know the answer to that, and we do not blame the Chinese authorities for being strict.

After all, they didn’t think twice before executing a Pakistani convicted of drug dealing.

I wonder how long it will be until the judge is disciplined for ordering this Chinese woman to learn English, his marxist colleagues in the justice system will surely have revenge on him.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Share

Nationalists will notice there are no references to the BNP being a bunch of racist thugs, and she gave a picture of us that no one in the UK would ever, ever  dare print.

Her reference to the ‘working class’ is relevant, because ‘La Stampa’ is read by the many thousands who work directly or indirectly for Fiat, the Italian carmaker.

There is an unusual quote that Britons may not know,  ”The working class goes to heaven”.

This refers to an Elio Petri’ film, “The working class goes to heaven”, the story of a factory worker fighting for better working conditions. It was made in 1972, during a time that workers were striking against their greedy employers and trying to change Italian politics.

The film interestingly, puts the spotlight on the indifference of the politicians to the working class; the supposed “Socialists” who should have been supporting the workers, sound familiar?

Ms Paci is the London correspondent of ‘La Stampa’, a Turin based daily; the translated article follows.

By Francesca Paci.

Peter works for a marketing company, Dave works for a construction company, Rory was a shop assistant but he lost his job a few months ago. At 11am they are all in front of the subway station in Becontree, remote eastern outskirts of London, about forty men and women between 30 and 50 years too late perhaps for the appointment with their life but punctual with the only party they believe will promise them redemption. A quarter of a century ago, probably they would have marched under the banner of socialism. Today, victims of economic and cultural globalization they show proudly the British National Party’ badge, the British far right party that from a modest 6% started to capitalize on the lost illusions of the Blair’ dreams.

“Come on boys, the elections are not won by sitting in the living room.” Slicked-back hair, square-toed shoes, full cream suit without an overcoat, Richard BARNBROOK, representative of the BNP in the London Assembly, braving cold to galvanize the militants with the red nose like the factory’ workers before dismissal typical of the first Ken Loach’ movies. The day is long but so is the list of families to contact door-to door and mark with an X in favor, opposed, uncertain. In Barking, a historic Labor party’ stronghold, the BNP already occupies 12 of the 51 seats: if on May 6 local elections, gained another 14, it would have the majority and control of the area, an historic victory for the pariahs of Westminster.

“So far, the electoral system has kept us away from the parliament but we are gaining supports on the ground where the people are tired of politicians, Europe, third-world immigrants,” says Giuseppe De Santis, 30-years old, from Catanzaro, the only foreigner in the BNP. Bob, a former window-fitter now unemployed is waiting with the engine running in the Ford Mondeo with loads of leaflets against the Labor Party that has changed the demography in Barking in its favour, (it was once 95% British working class), by assigning thousands of council houses to immigrants. Until a few months ago, the party’ constitution excluded non-whites from membership but then, after the intervention of the court, an Asian candidate, Rajinder Singh, applied for membership, a Sikh that will never forgive Muslims for his father’s death during the partition of ‘India in 1947. De Santis is Italian but there is no risk he will be confused with the Africans, the Pakistanis, the Chinese that through the neighborhood look with barely concealed suspicion BNP activists at work and, in doubt, he speaks only English.

“Racist and fascist, are the shame of the country ‘heats Margaret H., 58, a former maths teacher, weeding in the garden of the chalet in Roycraft avenue. “It’s about time somebody said no to multiculturalism that steals our work and roots” says, like two thirds of his fellow British, the 31 year old bricklayer Ralph. A door slammed in my face it’s worth another that opens: Ken, how to repair the roof and shakes hands like Ivan Drago in Rocky IV, the blonde Corry, Tony Mason, earrings and jeans with the hem lengthened given to him by someone taller than him.

“The BNP is not only appeals to unemployed workers but also to the middle class, skilled employees who share the fear of immigration and the disenchantment for the political class” notes Daniele Albertazzi, an expert on the new right of the University of Birmingham. Excluded from the mainstream media, the extreme right has specialized in door to door and online activism: “The first-past the post’ system psychologically discourage voters from voting a party without a chance, but if 2 members can make it to Brussels and others become councilors people will believe that things can change even at national level. ” In 1983, 83% of Britons believed that Tory and Labor were different, now this belief is shared by just one voter in five. If the BNP would get somewhere near the 30% majority it needs it would be enough to bring Nick Griffin in Westminster. Difficult, admits Albertazzi, but not impossible. Peter and the others believe it: if the working class did not go to heaven after all, the fault is not theirs.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Government departments are affected including passport services and additional strikes are planned during the campaign for the General Election. This is nothing compared to what will happen as soon as budget cuts are officially announced in April 2010 when the so called spring budget is delivered. By then, the Government would have made a decision regarding major redundancies and about VAT on food.

In fact, the present strike was brought about by changes of regulations affecting redundancy payments and trade union leaders talked about workers being ‘ripped up’. I wonder what jobcentre workers are thinking at the moment when their own jobs are on the line. Even those employed to help the unemployed are  in fear of losing their jobs.

Share

Share

Share

As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share

This story came up last year during the European elections with the intention of accusing the BNP of double standards as an anti-immigration party using images of non British people in its leaflets.

As all journalists should know the unauthorised use of someone’ picture or photo is illegal and anyone using the image can be sued.

This applies to everyone, not just the BNP, and that is why in the last few years TV programmes use faces that are pixellated to protect the identity of the people being shown.

Do you remember a few years ago a beefeater working in the Tower of London complained because his picture appeared in one of our leaflets.

By using foreign models we can avoid any legal action partly because those people clearly allowed their image to become public domain and so they indirectly authorised anyone to use it, and also because they are foreign they are unlikely to challenge us in any British court.

Even if someone in the UK agrees to appear in one of our leaflets, he/she may change idea and therefore we have to bin all the leaflets containing that picture.

Journalists should know this very well and maybe they do but of course they need to throw everything at us because the date for the local (and maybe general) elections is getting closer, even if this means printing silly stories like this.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

A secular Muslim woman councillor has been forced to dress more conservatively after receiving death threats and sexually harassing phone calls from members of her own community.

Shiria Khatun, 38, has called in the police after sinister calls in which threats were made not only against her, but also her four young children.

In one they warned they would dig up her parents’ graves and bury her there instead.

The Labour councillor in the controversial borough of Tower Hamlets—named in a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary last week as a centre of Islamic fundamentalism—is considered one of the area’s most progressive politicians.

She was elected in 2006, worked for Ken Livingstone as a transport adviser at London’s City Hall and frequently campaigns for more Muslim women to enter politics.

However, over the past year she has been the victim of a “sick” harassment campaign.

She has been bombarded with anonymous calls and even followed home.

At first she was “too embarrassed” to call the police, but when the threats, mostly made in the Bangladeshi dialect Sylheti, targeted her family she decided to act.

She said: “As a councillor I’m meant to be a strong woman and I didn’t want to show that I was bothered, but it’s gone too far.

“They’re really disgusting. They would talk about my Western clothes, my tight jeans and my body parts.

“One man said—and it sounds much nastier in Sylheti—‘I know where you live and I’m going to come and show you and your kids’. I just hung up.

“I really thought it was a pervert, but then it started to get more intense. My parents died when I was young and the callers must know that because they said they would dig up their graves and bury me inside. I think they’re sick.”

Following the calls, she started wearing more loose-fitting traditional Asian clothes and glasses instead of contact lenses to be “taken more seriously”.

She said: “I didn’t even realise that I was giving into them, but my skirts started getting longer and the whole thing left me demoralised.

“Other Muslim women have advised me to dress down because of rumours within the Bengali community, mostly men, criticising me for being too Western looking.

“I don’t like people exploiting religion to tell me I’m not a proper Muslim. We live in a democratic society and I have the right to dress how I like.”

She has so far refused to wear the Muslim hijab headscarf, something she said is a more common sight on the streets of Tower Hamlets—a densely Bangladeshi-populated borough—than in Bangladesh itself.

Many put that down to the growing influence of the strict Saudi Arabian Wahhabi doctrine of Islam in the East End of London.

Cllr Khatun added: “I returned from a visit to Bangladesh not long ago and it’s definitely more conservative here than it is there.

“I used to look at the photos of Bangladeshi women who came here in the Sixties and go ‘Wow!’ and think how amazingly fashionable and liberal they were with their short-sleeved blouses and bouffant hairdos.

“It’s all changed so much now for younger women.”

Police confirmed they were investigating the councillor’s complaint.

Well, this is what the BNP have been saying for years and we have been accused of inciting racial hatred.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Share

The whole affair was discovered by the owner of the property who contacted the Police. As a Police truck was being loaded with plants and electrical equipment used to maintain high temperatures inside the house, it became evident that the drug producers put the entire neighbourhood in danger.

Given the vast amounts of electricity used, several transformers couldn’t cope and the entire building could have been set on fire affecting nearby properties.

Well, well, another example of the consequences of Labour’s Multicultural policies, including gang violence, rapes, muggings, robberies, prostitution networks, peoples’ trafficking, drug production and drug dealing, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Britain has absolutely no control of its own borders and has become an easy target for all kinds of criminal activity.

Share

There is no need for me to repeat this, but I will anyway. Voters have never given Government a mandate for such a change and this secret document proves that Labour politicians were pushing for it against the will of the native Briton.

We nationalists know that immigrants and asylum seekers always jump the queue and receive priority attention in everything, from council houses to benefits, and any other kind of help they want.

More evidence comes from (the Islamic Republic of) Tower Hamlets, where a few days ago Charities Minister Angela Smith visited Bethnal Green’ Somali centre to find out how the East End’ Somali community is integrating.

This centre helps newly-arrived Somali women recently arrived in Britain and speaking very little or no English.

Among the services provided are, mentoring, language classes, assistance with phone calls and job applications.

“What impresses me is the pressure that members of the Somali community are under” Mr Smith said adding “The key to long term integration is to make sure they get the best for their children through education”.

The Minister heard how one Somali woman who could not speak English contacted the centre for help after being without heating and electricity all weekend.

One of the members of the centre, Bilan Said, said they are trying to bridge the gap between generations and intend to confront the stereotypical view of hjiab-wearing Somali women.

I am sure something will be done for her. But we all know that nothing, but nothing will be done about the violent crimes carried out by Somalian gangs.

Tower Hamlets is a mostly Bangladeshi enclave, with weekly English lessons and free crèche facilities for babies and toddlers being offered to Bangladeshi mums.

The lessons run by Tower Hamlets Education Business Partnership are followed by advice sessions for help with issues such as health, housing, social benefits and drug awareness.

A new three-year programme is being run in five Tower Hamlets primary schools, Hermitage, Osmani, Culloden, Marion Richardson and Stepney Greencoat. Three tailored programmes will also run at three special needs schools, Stephen Hawking, Phoenix and Beatrice Tate schools.

These programmes are being paid for by the TRS Foundation, the charitable arm of TR Suterwalla Asian food company which helps Bangladeshi parents and others from migrant communities to become more involved in their children’s education.

Any help for the indigenous Britons living there?

Of course not, because all the asian councillors running the borough care only for their own people.

Roughly 50,000 pensioners die every year from hypothermia, but a Somali woman not supposed to be here in the first place will be the only one to get help with electricity and heating, but no one is allowed to set up a similar charity aimed at helping the white British.

Let us not forget that the MP for Bethnal Green & Bow (with aid from the IFE) is George Galloway, a man who hates the fact that Britain was 90% white. Well now the figures are almost reversed in Tower Hamlets, he must be laughing up his red sleeve.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

It is no coincidence that the people responsible for these threats are the same ones working to destroy the European Nation States  in order to create a European superstate against the will of European citizens.

This is why our Chairman Nick Griffin is working with a network of nationalist parties from all over Europe to take on the EU and destroy it from within.

It seems the Dutch people are waking up, because the anti-Islam Freedom Party of “far-right” politician Geert Wilders has made major gains in local elections in the Netherlands. The Freedom Party has become the largest party in Almere and the second largest in The Hague.

Mr Wilders was visibly buoyed by the results and was characteristically combative saying this was the first step in the upcoming campaign for parliamentary elections.

“The national campaign begins today in Almere and The Hague, tomorrow in all of the Netherland. On 9 June, we’ll conquer the Netherlands,” said Mr Wilders.

The fall of the Dutch cabinet and the upcoming campaign for parliamentary elections overshadowed Wednesday’s municipal elections in the Netherlands. The actual results for the nearly 400 municipal councils hardly seemed to matter. All interest was focused on the implications of the upcoming parliamentary race.

And even though it only took part in two municipalities it was clear the day’s big winner was the right-wing populist party of Geert Wilders.

Mr Wilders now has his eye on the larger prize. His Freedom Party has profited more than any other from the fall of the Dutch cabinet ten days ago. The party currently has nine seats in parliament (out of 150).

If voters had elected a new parliament on Wednesday, the Freedom Party would have won between 24 and 27 seats. In one poll, it would be the largest single party. If his party does that well come June, Geert Wilders could become the next prime minister.

The national opinion polls also indicate that forming the next coalition will be more difficult than normal. Dutch coalition governments are usually made up of two or three parties. The next coalition will likely need four or more parties to reach a majority in parliament.

Then there is the question of whether Geert Wilder’s Freedom Party can join a coalition. Many mainstream parties cannot imagine forming a coalition with the Freedom Party owing to its “extreme” views.

And while Wilders says he is ready to make the compromises necessary to form partnerships with other parties, he is as yet untested.

That will soon change. The Freedom Party will feel the pressure to govern in the two cities, Almere and The Hague, where they did so well in municipal elections. Just days before the election, Mr Wilders said a ban on Muslim headscarves in public places would be non-negotiable. No other party will accept such a ban.

In fact, the call generated protests on election day. In Almere and The Hague, dozens of people, men and women, Muslim and non-Muslim, came to vote wearing headscarves.

The two largest parties in the former coalition government both lost seats on municipal councils. The Labour Party and the Christian Democrats paid the price for three years of uneven governing.

Caretaker Prime Minister Jan Peter Balkenende, Christian Democrat, tried to make the best of the poor results. In his reaction, he said, “Of course we wanted the results to be better, and our local candidates deserve better. But of course national events of the past two weeks played a role in these elections.”

The Labour Party also lost seats compared to four years ago. However, the losses were not as large as they could have been. Labour gained popularity in the wake of the fall of the government. All the more surprising since an unwritten rule in Dutch politics says that the party who brings about the fall of a cabinet usually looses seats.

Besides Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party, the big winners in Wednesday’s elections were the Green Left, and Democrat 66.

Local parties were frustrated by the domination of national politics. During the campaign, parties used sex and silliness trying to steer the attention back to local issues, but without much success.

Like Britain, Holland is ruled by a treacherous liberal elite determined to destroy the Dutch nation and it’s identity and is committed to harassing and prosecuting anyone who dares oppose it.

One of opposing, is Mr Wilders now on trial for offending Islam and risks 16 months prison if found guilty.

To add insult to the injury the Dutch court rejected 13 of the 16 witnesses who could have helped Mr Wilders.

Clearly the voters understood the real nature of his political prosecution, and they may have decided to support him in order to send a signal that they won’t tolerate this kind of political bullying.

So far little has been heard or see in the UK  MSM about this trial, not surprising really as they are committed to distorting or ignoring the truth.

So far the only politician commenting on the trial is the Italian President Giorgio Napolitano, a member of the now defunct communist party.

Mr Napolitano is concerned the Dutch have voted for a party that is anti-EU, and anti-immigration, and he stated that opposing EU integration is not just dangerous but an illusion because it’s impossible to turn the clock of history back.

The reason I mention Mr Napolitano is because after the ratification of the Lisbon treaty Britain is no longer a sovereign country and politicians like Mr Napolitano can have an influence on the EU mandarins that now run the EU.

Mr Napolitano a few years ago, when he was Interior minister, pushed for an amnesty of hundred of thousands of illegal immigrants living in Italy.

The BNP is not a threat to the treacherous liberal elite running this country but to the whole EU.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

London Enriched
Question No: 366 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
Does the Mayor believe that the large amounts of London Taxpayers’ money being utilised to support his and the former Mayor’s initiative “London Enriched” is a signal to refugees everywhere that London in particular is the home of milk and honey and exacerbates the arrival of thousands more refugees to Calais hoping eventually to get to London and access these perceived riches?
Oral response given at Mayor’s Question Time

Hate Crimes
Question No: 367 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
Ben Kinsella, Robert Knox, Jimmy Mizen, Martin Dinnegan, Peter Woodham, Richard Whelan, Billy Ward and Blly Gregory to name but a few in recent times, were all murdered by individuals from ethnic communities. Do you share the concern of many Londoners that absolutely none of these killings have been designated ‘racist murders’ by the Metropolitan Police, and that double standards are being applied, bearing in mind that, in my view, an enormous guilt trip was imposed on British people after the Stephen Lawrence murder and the subsequent numerous investigations?
Answer from the Mayor:
We must condemn all forms of violence as it affects all of London.

Global Warming (1)
Question No: 368 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
After your attendance at the Copenhagen Climate change Summit, would you agree with the sentiments of EU spokesman Nick Griffin MEP when he asserts that in fact “the world is cooling” and global warming is a fraud?
Answer from the Mayor:
Clearly I don’t agree as I launched my two climate change strategies earlier this month.

Global Warming (2)
Question No: 369 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
With the climate change agenda badly discredited with false data combined with one of the coldest spells on record, is it time to abandon our obsession with carbon footprints and tackle the real environmental disaster affecting London, namely overpopulation?
Answer from the Mayor:
Please see my response to MQ368 / 2010.

Global Warming (3)
Question No: 370 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
Would the Mayor agree that all his recent initiatives on water shortages, energy shortages, housing shortages and waste disposal problems actually point to London being populated beyond its means and is it not incumbent upon the Mayor to address that issue above all others?
Answer from the Mayor:
The ‘shortages’ and ‘problems’ to which you refer cannot all be attributed to population. A range of factors bear on them including changes in technology, lifestyles, incomes, governance, climate and relationships with neighbouring regions.
My initiatives to address them have taken into account these factors as well as London’s changing population.

Akmal Shaikh
Question No: 371 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
Your answer to Brian Coleman in Mayor’s question no: 318/2010, has provoked a number of constituents to ask how you conclude that Akmal Shaikh is a Londoner bearing
in mind he was born in Pakistan, lived in America for many years and moved to Poland in 2003? Is it now possible to be a Londoner without the need for being born in this fair city?
Answer from the Mayor:
Of course ones does not have to be born a Londoner to be one. London has a proud history of making people from all over the UK and the world Londoners.

Notting Hill Carnival
Question No: 372 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
What were the clean up costs in the aftermath of the Notting Hill Carnival for the years 2007, 2008 and 2009?
Who pays the clean up costs in the aftermath of the Notting Hill Carnival?
Answer from the Mayor:
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) and Westminster City Council (WCC) pay for cleaning their respective boroughs as their contribution of support for this international event.

RBKC’s costs were as follows:
2007/08 – £141,147
2008/09 – £151,699
2009/10 – £174,768

WCC’s costs are not specifically itemised within their cleansing contract, as it is part of an ‘all in’ service for special events, for which Carnival is only one activity.

Sexual Violence
Question No: 373 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
Is the Mayor taking any action in relation to the following report in “Safeguarding Children”: “A London Young Offenders Team has reported concerns about the number of young women who regard abusive behaviour from young men as a ‘normal’ part of adult relationships”?
Answer from the Mayor:
My draft violence against women strategy, “The Way Forward: a Call for Action to End Violence Against Women” highlighted the attitudes and beliefs held by young people in relation to violence against women including rape being used as a weapon and young women being passed around as “sexual accessories”.

The resulting strategy and action plan, will contain a number of actions that address the concerns raised about young women.

My Advisor on Health and Youth opportunities, Pam Chesters chaired a roundtable event at City Hall in October 2009 to explore the specific issues facing young women/girls and to jointly develop solutions. Through this event, I have ensured that this issue is firmly on the agenda of London partner agencies and we will continue to work with a wide range of partners to take matters forward for London.

Sexual Violence
Question No: 374 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
Following the report in “Safeguarding Children”, in particular the shocking revelation that “nearly all the girls involved with gangs have been raped by male group members. Some senior gang members pass their girlfriends around to lower ranking members and sometimes to the whole group at the same time”, what action is the Mayor taking to protect these vulnerable young girls from this kind of sexual abuse?
Answer from the Mayor:
Please see my response to MQ373 / 2010.

Sexual Violence (3)
Question No: 375 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
Following the report in “Safeguarding Children”, in particular the shocking revelation that a Year 10 student was recently gang raped by some gang members, the girl and her mother are extremely frightened and when questioned the mother insisted it was consensual, what action is the Mayor taking to protect vulnerable girls exposed to this kind of sexual abuse?
Answer from the Mayor:
Please see my response to MQ373 / 2010.

Positive Discrimination
Question No: 376 / 2010
Richard Barnbrook
In light of the disastrous Ali Dizaei fiasco, will the Mayor seek the abandonment of promotion in the public sector on grounds of race and gender and allow qualifications and probity to flourish once again become best practice?
Does the Mayor believe that organisations run more effectively when promoting people on their abilities rather than promotion on the basis of meeting equality targets?
Answer from the Mayor:
I believe that appointments should be made on merit. To do anything otherwise would be unlawful. However, I also believe that the public sector should have a workforce representative of the community it serves and that it should be representative at every level. This means that we should ensure we create an even playing field for every sector of the community – in applications, appointments and promotions to roles within public sector organisations.

A pitiful response from the Mayor on a whole range of issues. LIBLAB and CON have had their day, for 2010 VOTE BNP.

Share

Watching the footage above you will see a scene of total chaos caused by foreign African gangsters on the streets of Britain. This incident was the second in a week and started at 4.15pm, in North End, Croydon on February 19. One youth can be seen with a knife while others use whatever they an grab hold of.

Following the incident we have the usual nonsense from the police. Superintendent Dave Stringer, said: “Following the recent incidents in the town centre, I want to reassure the public that this kind of behaviour will not be tolerated. That will scare those involved I am sure …not..He went further “Incidents of this nature are relatively rare and I am confident the measures we have in place with our as part of our Safe for All scheme will continue to deter such behaviour and ensure Croydon town centre remains a safe place to work, shop and visit.” Oh dear you couldn’t make it up…well while its not entirely down to the police the Labour Government is doing a damn good job of making them look like idiots. VOTE BNP 2010..

Share

Councillor Robert Bailey

Leader of the Opposition, London Borough of Barking & Dagenham

The British National Party councillors sitting here tonight should feel pride in what they have achieved for the freedom loving people of this country and residents of this borough. Against all odds, the BNP have triumphed and made it through four hard years of struggle. Indeed, we are now on the verge of making history by possibly taking this Council and Margaret Hodges and John Cruddas’ parliamentary seats.

Under Labour misrule, we the British people have witnessed our democracy made fragile, our civil liberties removed, war mongering, our economy ruined and bankrupted and a Marxist assault on our British identity, values and culture. Who would have dreamed all of this would originate from a Labour Party, formed to fight for the rights of British workers and to protect us from the excesses of the markets and capitalism? Labour and its treasonous followers have put Britannia literally on her knees. It has made our beloved homeland a safe haven for tyrants and foreign terrorists, crime bosses and foreign oligarchs, murderers and paedophiles.

The BNP warned, from taking office, that the Labour Party should respect the wishes and views of the British people and embark on a programme of change and reform. MPs and Councillors are elected to represent the British people not to ignore them, lord it over them or engage in corruption, self enrichment and betterment. While Labour has encouraged a snout in the trough culture in Westminster and elsewhere we have seen a massive gap open up between rich and poor. Our national inheritance has been squandered and our national debt increased to an unprecedented level of nearly £900 billion pounds. Under Labour the Bankers are rewarded with untold and undeserved riches while the poor are impoverished and lose their rights.  

Indeed, the scale of the Labour Government’s mishandling of this Nation and its economy is literally breathtaking. Remember Gordon Brown promised an ‘end to boom and bust’. Recently, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, said there would be no cuts until 2011, yet here in Barking & Dagenham, the Labour Party is putting forward a budget based solely on ‘slash and burn’ policies and politics.

Everyone knows nothing is sacred under this labour administration not even the care of the elderly. The price of meals on wheels has increased significantly in the past few years and now the Labour party wants to increase charges for all council services. These increases will affect young and old alike using library facilities, elderly care facilities, community halls and social activities. Have Labour really no compassion for people who built and fought for this country and some of whom are now faced with the decision of heating or eating?

Only by voting for the BNP and electing a BNP Council will the elderly and poor have a real champion in this chamber. Enough is enough say the BNP. The BNP alternative budget proposes a reduction in the cost of the meals on wheels service and no increases in council charges. The Labour group’s decision to increase fees and charges across the borough really shows how out of touch they are with local people.

In regard to council housing charges the Labour Party is proposing further average increases – rent – £1.28 a week, communal heating and hot water charges £1.22 per week and tenants services charges up 21p per week.  This increases the average council tenant’s costs per month by £10.84.  With growing competition for jobs, falling wages and decreasing job security, pensions reduced and savings interest’s rates down. The Labour party really knows how to kick someone when they are down. This is what you get when you vote for Labour bullies.

To help every single one of the residents in this borough the BNP budget promises not a freeze but a reduction in council tax by a massive 7 percent. If elected to run this council the BNP promises the residents of this borough in 5 years they will have one of the lowest Council taxes in the whole of London if not the lowest. For years the BNP has campaigned against this crippling tax on proud British people and their households. There should be no doubt in the voters mind that whilst Labour is not proposing any increases this year they still need to fund their loony left wing PC projects and they rely on the council tax to do this. By giving the residents a massive reduction in council tax the BNP will put more money back in the pockets of workers and give them more economic choices. Labour wants to keep the British working man a slave and it achieves this through taxing him to the hilt. Even Count Dracula could not come up with a Council tax strategy that means you pay even after you are dead.

Labour’s social engineering via mass unchecked immigration to change the face of Britain and rub the nose of the Tories in the dirt has cost all Britons dearly. The increase of immigrants from all over the world coming into our borough has put a huge demand on council housing, temporary accommodation, school places, NHS services, and Care for the Elderly. The borough of Barking & Dagenham already under Labour one of the poorest boroughs in London has suffered a catastrophe. London is now a foreign country to many white Britons and 100,000 every year vote with their feet and leave London. Even ethnic minority councillors in neighbouring boroughs are pleading with white Britons to stay put. This is all Labour’s doing and it will be their poisonous legacy. Those who have been brave enough to complain against this insane genocidal policy like the BNP have been branded by Labour racists. Labour and its fellow travellers have even branded whole communites of white British people racists in an effort to silence them. Shame. The truth is the residents of this borough are sick of being pushed to the back of the queue by Labour and people who have contributed nothing to our national pot which was built up with the blood, sweat and tears of our British ancestors.

British National Party surveys year after year have shown the borough’s residents demanding change with the way that the council operates and delivers its services.  Local people are angry, frustrated and demanding that they be put first when resources are allocated.  This is what the BNP intends to do if elected and our budget plans accepted. It also seems we have the backing of Margaret Hodge, MP for Barking and many in the local Labour Party who have recently voted with their feet and left Labour.  

Let me make it clear, the BNP if elected will do everything possible to bring back the points based system which favours local people. This is what people want. The BNP has listened to people on housing and has budgeted £4m for the buying back of former council houses at a market rate.  This will provide homes for many needy local people who can prove their long term connection with the borough. The BNP also promise to build new council housing in the future for local people.  The BNP would also fund its own credit union which would in the future provide mortgages at a fair rate for local people.

Considerable amounts of money will be saved by the BNP bringing a whole range of services which have been contracted out back in house. We regret that Labour is sacking lots of hard working council workers but if Labour had taken steps four years ago when we recommended this situation could have been avoided. Yet again Labour has let down the civil service, workers and betrayed the unions.

The BNP is concerned that many elderly people are terrified of leaving their homes and that once out they feel unsafe. The BNP have budgeted for buying in 10 Metropolitan police officers to help stabilise rising crime levels in the borough and to provide a notable presence on our streets. If elected we will do everything in our power to ensure there are no more murders like Sukhwinder Singh’s. Like us or not we will bring order.

With rising levels of unemployment, we are setting money aside to facilitate work experience and keep youngsters out of trouble.  We will not encourage, as Labour does, our children to compete with cheap labour immigrants flipping burgers and waiting on tables.  We will be a champion of British Business, the professional trades, entrepreneurship and self employment.  We would also work as closely with the unions as possible to ensure delivery of these objectives.

Labour has been an economic disaster for this borough as far as job creation and retainment. Ford closed down most of its business here, and increased business rates and loony red tape and PC nonsense has driven many family run local businesses to the wall. May & Baker has now decided to shut up shop and move out of the borough taking many jobs 100s of jobs with it.  The BNP believes this country needs a new British Industrial Revolution which puts British workers into British jobs and gives people a meaningful existence and pride.  A BNP council will ensure local business interests and local people will be put first when tendering for future employment and council contracts. 

The BNP views the Labour run London and council grant system as racist and divisive working against the council’s own stated policies on cohesion and integration and community safety.  Encouraging ethnic minority groups to divide along racial and religious lines fosters hatred and pits them against each other and the indigenous British community. British indigenous needs and desires are often ignored and neglected by Labour as they chase minority and immigrant votes. The British National Party would cut all funding to groups which cater for one ethnic or religious group. Instead we will promote a Being British Day and make more money available for British celebrations.

Today, Phil Woolas the Labour minister for mass immigration and known liar stated the BNP is trying to whip up violence in the lead up to the election. Well I would say to Phil Woolas and his Labour cohorts including the violent extremists in the UAF and Hope not Hate – you will not win with your lies and poison. It will choke you in the end. It is you who have created this multicultural mess and the Great British public will not be conned into laying the blame at anyone else’s door.

The BNP since it was elected has campaigned tirelessly against fraud and corruption. Benefit fraud and sub letting of council housing is now practised on an industrial scale, robbing the taxpayer of millions a year. The Labour Party has little interest in this area and we know why they have been robbing the taxpayers themselves by claiming falsely for second homes and an assortment of things including tea and biscuits. The BNP budget proposes increased funding for the investigation of fraud in the council. In December 2009 alone, 12 properties were recovered from criminals saving the council £900,000.  The value of the service is easily demonstrated and the misery that fraudulent applications for housing and sub-letting causes is unquantifiable.

It is not fair that Labour appointed fat cats in this council receive more pay than the prime-minister. The BNP budget if accepted will encourage those who receive more than they should to hand back a percentage of their wages and get with the real world. Real savings will be made by cutting PC madness on translation services, equality and diversity teams, and paperwork and duplication. The BNP is serious about delivering value for money for the taxpaying residents of this borough.  

My final message and I hope this is heard loud and clear across this borough is that this budget from the BNP and the election of a BNP council will bring about a real break from a disastrous Labour past and deliver to the people of this borough a real hope for a future.

Thank You.

Share