As austerity hits native Britons pockets and deep cuts in essential services are imminent, nationalists will be interested to read that asylum seekers seeking permission to stay in Britain are being offered free swimming pool or gym sessions while they wait.

More than 250 people from other countries have so far made use of a special card that gets them into council leisure facilities that residents – and even pensioners – have to pay to use.

Britons wanting to join the scheme – operating in Newcastle – can expect to pay up to £180 a year for the city council’s Leisure Plus card.

But 256 of the city’s 480 asylum seekers have taken up the offer of a free card, at a cost to council taxpayers of £7,000.

Bureaucrats regard the scheme as so successful it may be copied by other local authorities around the country.

Your Homes Newcastle, responsible for housing the applicants, says the scheme prevents users from feeling isolated in a strange country, and encourages them to become part of the community in which they are living.

But TaxPayers’ Alliance spokeswoman Emma Boon said: “Offering one group of people a particular service for free, whilst others, including pensioners, are paying is likely to create divisions in the local community.”

Applicants must be able to prove their asylum seeker status to qualify for the card, which is valid for six months and includes free use of Newcastle’s state-of-the-art Centre for Sport complex.

Steve Murphy, chair of Your Homes Newcastle, said: “We believe the scheme has real economic and social benefits.

“It helps to integrate asylum seekers. This makes Newcastle a more vibrant and diverse place.

Maybe Mr Murphy should consult Newcastle’s long term residents to see if they are happy to allow their city to be enriched.

But we know the answer, don’t we?

The same argument has been used by Labour (Conservatives got there first) to swamp Britain with immigrants in order to make it multicultural, they were well aware that voters would have never approved.

This is why they introduced tough race-hatred laws that make any criticism of immigration a criminal offence (BNP activists know only too well what I’m talking about).

On the bright side this programme may help us to get more supporters up North.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

DEMOS. People Flow means Prosperity for Europe

Indigenous Defence Force

IDF Thursday, 22 April 2010
Anthony Brown

The People Flow authors make a mistake common among pro-immigration advocates: seeing a nation as nothing more than a geographical entity with a functioning economy and a legal system. But a nation is first and foremost its people. It is the French people that define what France is, not lines on a map.

The pro-immigrationists are effectively trying to abolish nationhood, denying a country the right to sustain its own culture.

British-born white people, the progeny of the generation who survived the Nazi attempt to obliterate Britain as an independent nation state, now account for only 60% of the population of London. England has for more than 1500 years been a Christian country – its flag is a cross, its head of state is head of the national church – but in its second city Birmingham, Islam is now more worshipped than Christianity. In two boroughs of London, whites are already in the minority, and they are expected to become a minority in several cities in the coming decade.

If current trends continue, the historically indigenous population of Britain will become a minority by around 2100. Islam is the fastest growing religion, and much immigration to Britain comes from Muslims fleeing Muslim lands – around 75% of intercontinental asylum seekers are Muslim. But where are the limits? In an extreme example, would British Christians have a right not to live in an Islamic majority state?

For an answer to this, consider what that most liberal of American writers, Gore Vidal, said in a lecture in Dublin in 1999:

“A characteristic of our present chaos is the dramatic migration of tribes. They are on the move from east to west, from south to north. Liberal tradition requires that borders must always be open to those in search of safety or even the pursuit of happiness. But now with so many millions of people on the move, even the great-hearted are becoming edgy. Norway is large enough and empty enough to take in 40 to 50 million homeless Bengalis. If the Norwegians say that, all in all, they would rather not take them in, is this to be considered racism? I think not. It is simply self-preservation, the first law of species.”

But at what point are people of the west allowed to say that enough is enough, it is time for us to be allowed to preserve our culture? This is an issue of almost total, mind-numbing hypocrisy among western governments and political elites. They defend the inalienable right of other peoples – the Palestinians, Tibetans, native Americans – to defend their culture, but not the right of their own peoples.

It is vital to emphasise that mass immigration and the remarkably intolerant ideology of multiculturalism are exclusively western phenomena. Indeed, the striking thing about the global immigration debate in the west is its determined parochialism. If people in India, China, or Africa were asked whether they have a right to oppose mass immigration on such a scale that it would transform their culture, the answer would be clear. Yet uniquely among the 6 billion people on the planet, westerners – the approximately 800 million in western Europe, North America and Australasia – are expected by the proponents of mass immigration and multiculturalism to abandon any right to define or shape their own society.

This liberal hypocrisy was perfectly illustrated in 2002, when the British government gave full UK passports to 200,000 people living in British overseas territories, such as St. Helena, Montserrat and the Turks & Caicos islands. The inhabitants were allowed to live in Britain, but there was no reciprocal right for British people to live there.

The justification for this one-sidedness was given in the House of Lords by the foreign office minister Valerie Amos:

“The right of abode is non-reciprocal. The territories which fall within the scope of the Bill are for the most part small islands. In consultations on the content of the Bill the governments of the territories concerned made clear that granting British and European citizens the right of abode in their territories would risk fundamentally altering the social, cultural and economic fabric of the territories.”

Britain too is a small island, yet other British government ministers tell the British people that they must embrace mass immigration, and that it is simply racist for British people to oppose the altering of their country’s social, cultural and economic fabric. What makes the Caribbean and South Atlantic islanders noble in defending their culture, and the British racist in defending theirs? It is largely about being a minority, and being outnumbered. But western people are a global minority. There are more citizens of either India and China than all the people of Europe, North America and Australasia put together. There are as many people in Bangladesh and Pakistan together as in the US.

In the developing world, there are simply no significant equivalents of Europe and the US, where around 10% of people are foreign born, or Canada and Australia where the proportion is around 25%. The foreign born in the developing world rarely exceed 1% of the population.

Indeed, developing countries have been the most draconian in clamping down on immigration. In 2002, Malaysia started forcibly returning some of the thousands of illegal immigrants from Indonesia, while India put soldiers on its borders with Bangladesh to force illegal Bangladeshi immigrants back home. Western countries do not cane illegal immigrants or point a gun at them, but provide them with free immigration lawyers, free shelter, free food, free schooling and free healthcare – then express disappointment when they are reluctant to leave.

Several countries outside the developed west actively discriminate in favour of their own nationals. Saudi Arabia has adopted an official policy of “Arabisation” of many commercial sectors; Nigeria pursues “indigenisation” of its engineering industry, and Zimbabwe’s agricultural policy has similar motivations. In 2002, India began issuing residency cards to the 20 million “people of Indian origin” currently living in the west, specifically writing the legislation to exclude any white people born in India. Meanwhile, the South Korean government insists it is not a nation of immigrants, but an ethnic group with shared history and culture, while Japan has no desire to dilute its unique identity by opening the floodgates of mass immigration.

- Anthony Brown

Share

Nationalists know that all those claiming asylum in the UK are scroungers, whose one goal is to milk as much as they can from our benefit system.

Further confirmation comes from the Evening Standard which reported that a mother of five tried to get a bigger house by making up a story that she had been kidnapped, and now she is facing time in jail.

Yurup Ismael told police that her ex-husband had abducted her. But she was lying in an attempt to climb Harrow’s housing ladder.

It was revealed in a costly investigation, that the man she had accused of the crime was in prison at the time. She had simply wanted to be given a bigger house in a nicer, safer neighbourhood to keep her away from him.

Ismael, 48, pleaded guilty to charges of perverting the course of justice and fraud by false representation. Amother charge of fraud by false representation was not pursued.

Prosecutor Dipan Vavsali said: “The case is being put that she used the allegation of kidnap in order to obtain a better home.” Ismael, originally from Somalia, was given refugee status by Holland and became a Dutch national.

In 1999 she left Holland. She arrived in Milton Keynes in 2000 and held a tenancy there. Then in August 2002 she applied to Harrow council as homeless owing to domestic violence.

The council accepted a homelessness duty to her in October 2002 and she has been accommodated by the council since, moving to her current home in College Hill Road, Harrow Weald, in July last year.

At the time of her alleged abduction, jobless Ismael was in temporary accommodation at Exeter Road, Rayners Lane.

Ismael, who has two daughters aged 13 and 18 and three sons aged four, six and 16, is due to be sentenced at Harrow crown court by Recorder David Halpern, QC.

The case comes days after a family of former asylum seekers receiving £2,000 a week in housing benefit to live in a £2.1 million Kensington property were told they can stay in their home.

Somali refugees Abdi and Sayruq Nur and their seven children moved into the three-storey home last month — near neighbours including designer Stella McCartney and artist Lucian Freud — after saying they did not like a £900-a-week home in Kensal Green.

And mother of seven Toorpakai Saiedi, 35, has received £170,000 a year in benefits — £150,000 of it to rent her seven-bedroom house in west London.

Ealing council paid the £12,458-a-month bill, which is five times the normal rent for a similar home in the same road.

The £1.2 million house has three reception rooms, two kitchens and a 100ft garden.

Suppose you are a white and British who has lived in this country all your live, paid your taxes and need new accommodation to get away from your violent partner.

Would the council give you a bigger house in a nicer, safer neighbourhood?

We know the answer, don’t we?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Ireland, like Britain, is run by a treacherous political elite committed to destroying Irish identity through mass immigration.

The only difference between us is that in Ireland there are still journalists with independent minds and open eyes and common sense, something rare as rocking horse manure in the UK.

Ian O’Doherty is one of them.

A piece he wrote in the Irish Independent. Mr O’Doherty attacks the pro-immigration lobby who believe they have the right to harass anyone who dares oppose immigration.

Mr O’Doherty is not a BNP supporter and because he is not his comments have more credibility as no one can accuse him of being a ‘nazi’.

I present the article in full, as nationalists have no chance of finding anything like this printed in a British newspaper, the NUJ would never allow it.

The current debacle in Mosney was rightly declared by the Free Legal Advice Centre to be “an accident waiting to happen”, but it also brings up some other, wider issues.

In fact, the whole debate about refugees/asylum seekers, or whatever you want to call them, is a boil that needs to be lanced.

Indeed, the debate has become completely poisoned by professional Left-wing advocates who immediately denounce anyone with a dissenting voice as a racist.

This reached the height of wicked stupidity when the Immigrant Council of Ireland actually went to the police and tried to have Kevin Myers prosecuted because he had written a piece about Africa that they didn’t like.

This is the country we now live in, where government-funded groups would have journalists arrested on the grounds that they said something that didn’t fit their ideology.

And because of this Stalinist urge to purge anyone who dares to deviate from the same hymn sheet, most people prefer to just keep their head down and say nothing rather than have a horde of screaming morons descend on them making the spurious accusation of racism.

But ask yourself this — those of us in our mid-to-late 30s were the last emigration generation and when we applied for visas to the States or Australia, we knew the rules of engagement.

Australia, in particular, was quite open about their entry requirements — if you possessed a skill they wanted or needed, you got in. If not, you didn’t.

It wasn’t racist; it was just one of those things.

Now, in Ireland, we need to stop beating around the bush and start uttering some harsh truths.

Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the Mosney situation, it’s time for Ireland to admit that, sorry, we’re full.

We simply cannot afford to accommodate any more people who, through free accommodation, free legal advice, food, clothing and so on, become a burden on the State from the moment they arrive on Irish soil.

That’s not racism, that’s simply a case of pragmatic self-interest.

And, before you start to bleat that we need to take account of the horrid lives and hideous countries these people invariably come from, you can answer back — do we really?

On a human level, obviously it is impossible not to feel compassion for some of the stories we hear on a daily basis from refugees and asylum seekers, but the reality is that no matter how heart-rending their stories may be, ultimately they are not our problem.

At what point did Ireland suddenly have a moral obligation to look after people who had probably never even heard of this country until they got here?

At what point did we have a moral obligation to provide care and comfort and take on the financial burden of people who have no identifiable skills, who can’t speak the language and who, alongside their children, will only ever take from a system they never contributed to in the first place?

Look, I can’t blame people for wanting to come here from there.

Having said that, the State has an obligation towards its own citizens first.

We have more of a right to access the country’s education, health and social welfare provisions than someone who only arrived here last week.

Is that racist? Is it now racist to point out that the vast amounts of money spent on the asylum process and the seekers themselves would have been better spent maintaining and preventing the HSE cuts to the already lamentable support given to respite carers?

Of course, the hundreds, if not thousands of people riding the asylum gravy train will immediately take their head out of the financial trough they’ve been gorging on for years and start to scream about racism/bigotry/whatever you’re having yourself.

But as the new Australian PM Julia Gillard pointed out this week, being concerned about the number of people who come to your country and are just a burden does not make you a racist.

She is to be congratulated on having the stones to say what the average Irish politician, or indeed person, would think but not say.

Left-wing advocates would have you believe that if you harbour any doubts at all about untrammelled immigration not being a good thing, then you belong in the British National Party.

And, ironically, because they have been so successful in stifling proper debate and slurring people they disagree with, this has left a vacuum which the likes of the BNP were quick to fill.

Here in Ireland, you only have to listen to some radio phone-in shows and read Irish blogs to see what true racism really is — ugly, spiteful, ignorant and full of an irrational hate.

Indeed, it happened to me a while back when a woman rang the office to say fair play for not being politically correct. When I said thanks, she then went to add: “You’re a good man, Iano, I f***ing hate niggers as well.”

It was a profoundly depressing moment; the realisation that because nobody wants to talk reasonably about this issue, as soon as someone does, the bigots think they have a mouthpiece.

I don’t answer my phone any more.

But what the likes of that moron who rang, or the hate-spewing rabble of the phone-in shows, prove is that ignorance, stupidity and contempt for common sense is not limited solely to the activists on the Left.

- Ian O’Doherty

Irish Independent

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Theft is bad, but stealing money intended for starving children is one of the worst things a person can do.

One such person is an asylum seeker who conned charities, including BBC’s Children in Need into paying him £42,000 in grants has been jailed for three years and seven months.

Moses Bushiri, 48, claimed to be helping refugees from war and genocide settle into British society through his Central African Association.

He convinced backers — which also included the Big Lottery Fund and the Welsh Assembly Government — to fund his bogus charity.

As a result of his charitable work, he was presented with a Millennium Award Certificate by the Big Lottery Fund, and was also named an “Ambassador for Peace”.

But once he received the awards the Burundian conman pocketed the cash. Jailing Bushiri at Southwark crown court, Judge David Higgins described him as “thoroughly dishonest” and said the convictions would undermine public confidence in charities.

He added: “Your criminal wrongdoing was premeditated, systematic, sustained and sophisticated.

“A grosser breach of trust to the charity — and therefore to other asylum seekers genuinely in need — and also a greater abuse of this country’s sympathetic approach to asylum applications, would be difficult to imagine. As far as you were concerned, from the outset, the principal motive was dishonestly to generate a personal income from the charitable funds, for you to spend as you saw fit. The public is rightly outraged by such conduct.”

The court had heard that Bushiri came to this country as an asylum seeker from Burundi in July 2001.

He set up the Central African Association in Cardiff apparently to help refugees from the region settle in Wales.

Between 2001 to 2004, the CAA obtained grants totalling £42,000. While some of that money was used to fund networking events, at least £20,000 was simply pocketed by the defendant.

In a joint statement issued today Children in Need, the Big Lottery Fund and the Wales Council for Voluntary Action said: “As funders of charities affected by this criminal activity we very much welcome the conviction and today’s sentence. Today’s sentence supports our shared commitment as funders of charities, to vigorously pursue any such abuse of funding.”

Father-of-three Bushiri, of Smethwick, West Midlands, was convicted of six counts of obtaining a money transfer by deception and two of false accounting. He admitted a further count of false accounting and one of forgery.

It would be interesting to know what the grounds were for someone from Burundi being given the right to stay in the UK, but I suspect we all know the answer.

Mr Bushiri should be kicked out of Britain now, I don’t see why British taxpayers should pay for him to spend time in a British prison with all the comforts that many pensioners can only dream of.

As for nationalists they should stop giving money to those charities because very little of it reaches the people that actually need help.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

It is reported that the Home Secretary will be imposing a strict limit on the number of non-EU work permits to be handed out, and it is expected to lead to a sharp reduction in the more than 100,000 migrants and family members who are told they can work here each year.

The cap is being forced through despite protests from some Tory Cabinet ministers, (I wonder how many lobbyists are pushing the Ministers?) they claim it could hit the profits of UK business and Universities.

So is government finally listening to people?

Of course not, there are so many loopholes immigrants can use to sneak in, such as inter-company transfers where big companies move staff from one country to another.

Also there is no mention of new measures to prevent ‘asylum’ seekers coming into the UK, and no indication that the million or so illegal immigrants/asylum seekers (there is no such thing as a legal asylum seeker) living in the UK will be kicked out.

This is hardly surprising as we have pointed out before, immigration and asylum policies are now decided by the EU and Theresa May must accept the will of the unelected EU bureaucrats.

And there is nothing we can do to prevent those with an EU passport coming here, one example being the hundreds of thousand Poles who migrated to the UK for economic reasons (All Balkan states are allowed to work here, Balkanisation by design).

In the last few months as the financial crisis deepened, and it has become harder to find employment in the UK, thousands of Poles left Britain but a study suggests they found the situation to be far worse in their homeland, and around a third could be about to travel for a second time.

One in three of those interviewed by the Polish research company ISQ said that they wanted to work abroad again.

Dr Dorota Wiszejko-Wierzbicka, author of the study, said the relative wealth and the hard economic climate in Poland lay behind the desire to migrate.

“They know that not only is there better pay abroad but there are also more jobs,” she said.

“In Poland barely a third of the returnees surveyed by us have a steady job, and many complain of a hostile Polish labour market. No wonder then that one-third want to leave again.”

Poland weathered the global recession with reasonable success, and it was the only EU country to record economic growth last year.

But it is still plagued by an unemployment rate of 12.3 per cent, and this figure rises to more than 20 per cent in the small towns and rural areas that are home to many of those contemplating packing their bags for a second time.

The results of the ISQ study are supported by similar research carried out in south-western Poland, which found that large numbers or returnees had little or no desire to remain in the country.

Bartosz Trzaskalski, from the Centre for Strategic Consulting and author of the study, said: “With us we found that up to half of the returnees announced that once again they will be leaving for a job abroad within the next two years.”

But the news that Poles coming home after working abroad have trouble finding jobs and settling down will also renew fears in Poland of what demographers and economists have dubbed the “lost generation”.

Having spent many years working in menial jobs in the UK, and now with no skills suitable for the Polish market, economists fear they will become a burden on the Polish state.

Britain absorbed the vast majority of the hundreds of thousands who left Poland after EU accession in May 2004.

It’s not difficult to foresee a new wave of Polish immigration, even if there are no jobs available, because they can still claim benefits and get free health care.

So much for the Tories putting a cap on immigration.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

A few days ago we told you that the Labour party is owned and run by foreigners, and we know that because in the last 13 years they have swamped Britain with immigrants in order to create a NuLabour electoral base.

So no one will be surprised to hear that Ed Balls is launching a drive to get more ethnic minority candidates into Labour politics, pledging that, as party leader he would devote a proportion of party funds towards boosting their numbers.

The leadership contender plans to set up a Labour party diversity fund enabling candidates from groups currently under-represented to stand for elected office.

The number of minority MPs doubled at the last election from 14 to 27 with Labour’s Shabana Mahmood becoming the first Muslim woman to get elected in Birmingham Ladywood and Chi Onwurah became the first African woman to win Newcastle Central. But the number is still too low and there are perennial calls for the introduction of shortlists composed of all black and minority ethnic candidates.

In an article to be published on the website of community organisation ‘Labour Values’, Balls will say: “We must do better for all of those who are under-represented, including black, Asian and minority ethnic groups, the disabled and people from poorer and disadvantaged backgrounds.

“Even just a few pence in every pound could make a real difference to those that need help to stand, and would give a voice to those who struggle to be heard.”

Indeed Labour relies heavily on immigrants votes and they tend to support candidates who belong to their same ethnic group and this explains why Mr Balls wants more black and asian candidates.

Expect Labour to ignore the white working class as they will pay attention only to immigrants and asylum seekers.

On the bright side, those people neglected by Labour will start to support the British National Party, the only party willing to put the interests of native Britons first.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

I was pruning my extremely diverse archive and found this little pearl of wisdom from a character called DirtyHarry. I have no idea where I picked this up from, but obviously it struck a chord in me.
So if DirtyHarry cares to make him/herself known to me I would be only too glad to give them a HatTip.

IARF – Immigration and Asylum Relief Fund
DirtyHarry.

I hereby propose that a new fund be set up. This fund will be voluntarily contributed to by any member of the public who feels they have an obligation, duty or desire for the welfare of migrant workers from the EU and asylum seekers.

All welfare services for such individuals will be financed from the fund, including medical costs, housing rental costs, work seeker allowance etc. Immigrants and asylum seekers who are able to find employment, will be expected to contribute a small amount to this fund, in the form of a new IARF tax, this gives those fortunate enough to receive assistance an opportunity to say “thank you” by helping other hapless immigrants and asylum seekers.

This fund helps to ensure that the costs of such services are not unjustly imposed upon the general public but are borne by those who have a desire to assist such people.

Naturally the size of this fund and the degree to which members of the public who have excess money around, contribute, will limit the number of people who are able to be assisted in any given year.

This will address the growing problem of our public services being burdened by ever growing numbers of claimants.

Share

The UK Border Agency has been asked to cut its staff by up to 30% because of budgetary constraints but apparently, like many part of the public sector, it always find a way to waste money in useless projects.

It has emerged that under a new scheme migrants are to be asked whether they like living in the UK and if the immigration system is working properly.

The UK Border Agency (UKBA) is spending tens of thousands of pounds on the survey, which will involve quizzing thousands of new arrivals.

The survey aims to ‘explore the perceptions’ of a wide range of migrants – including asylum seekers, refugees, economic migrants, foreign students and immigrants joining their families in the UK.

It states that in order to ‘address a key evidence gap’ in its data it needs a ‘sample size’ of between 4,000 and 6,000 migrants to help ‘develop’ Government immigration policy.

The UKBA – which is run by the Home Office – states that it wants to ‘conduct a large-scale face-to-face survey of migrants in the UK’ to find out;

* What ‘their experiences’ – positive and negative – of living in Britain are
* How they are using public services – such as libraries, buses, schools and healthcare
* How they are contributing to the UK
* Why they came to live in the UK in the first place – and whether they intend on staying permanently

The team is expected to interview ‘vulnerable’ immigrants who have poor English skills or face deportation because of their asylum status.

The final report , including an analysis of key findings, is due to be handed over the Home Office chiefs by March next year.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘It is ridiculous to be pandering to the needs of Britain’s migrant population with a costly survey to ask how they’re getting on.

‘If they didn’t like the UK they wouldn’t have moved here in the first place, they are clearly able to vote with their feet and this is a foolish waste of taxpayers’ money.

‘Taxpayers will rightly be worried that the Home Office will use the conclusions of this survey to try and justify new spending, at a time when all government departments should be looking to make savings.’

Maybe they should ask how many of those newcomers manage to get big houses, expensive cars, brand new plasma TVs and have an high lifestyle at a time when many people born in the UK can barely afford to put food on the table.

I checked the date, it’s not the 1st of April.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

It seems that BNP activists in Rotherham are doing a very good job, because Denis MacShane has said that Iraqi asylum seekers should now return to their own country after the successful democratic election.

The Polish-born Labour MP told the House of Commons:

“The successful election that has just been held in Iraq suggests that we may now be moving towards a more stable Iraq.

“Yes, there will be violence and explosions but the British Isles have known plenty of those in the past 30 or 40 years.

“I always now say to Iraqi asylum seekers who come to see me: ‘You can go home.

You can return with the English you’ve learned, you no longer need to demand the right to settle and stay permanently in our country’.”

The MP has previously said that there was no reason or justification for Kosovan refugees to claim asylum in Britain and they should return to the Balkan nation.

He added: “There are regular BA flights to Kosovo which is enjoying a boom and Kosovans whose claim to Britain is because of the brutality of their Serb oppressors now have an independent nation which is getting closer to the European Union.”

The Rotherham MP and former Europe Minister had previously called for tough action to deport foreign nationals who have no right to stay in Britain.

Mr MacShane said that he also regularly counsels asylum seekers from countries like Iraq or the Balkan states to return home.

And this is the same Denis MacShane who denies the fact that there are too many immigrants in the UK, he is also an enthusiastic supporter of the thuggish UAF.

But more important than his previous stand is his desire to keep his place at the trough and carry on milking the public purse with the expense system, he is definitely feeling the breath of the BNP down the back of his neck.

Let’s hope he is dislodged from his seat and pays dearly for his treachery.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Another D list celebrity joined the BNP-bashing brigade.

Boy George, the drug addict singer who spent time in jail for kidnapping a rent boy, on his blog attacked the BNP.

Nationalists can see for themselves what a pervert thinks of us:

The BNP has announced today that its members have voted to allow blacks and asians to join the party if they so wish. Leader Nick Griffin claims that this move proves that the BNP is no longer a racist party but if you believe this then ignorance must be your middle name!

It is a sad fact that there are actually people of colour who support the BNP but so far not enough to cause any real concern. Some blacks and asians who have lived in this country for years or those born here think that the BNP are onto something and buy into the BNP’s mantra ‘Britian for the British’. As a child of an Irish refugee, I find this stomach churning.

My mother came over on the boat from Ireland in the 50′s when there were signs outside guest houses saying ‘No blacks, No Jews, No Dogs, No Irish’ and at one time or another every minority has been enemy number one for racists in this country.

Hence the lyric from my song ‘Inhuman Nature’ ‘They did it to the Irish, the Blacks and Asians too, step up all asylum seekers because this time it’s you’. The latest victims of blind nationalism are those from Eastern Europe who like the others before them are being accused of ‘taking our jobs’ or ‘Buggering our economy’.

One has to question what a pure or true Brit is when you consider that our Monarchy is made of foreign parts and most of us would be surprised or even horrified if we bothered to research our actual lineage.

Most of us are mutts at the end of the day and who really gives a toss? Nick Griffin and his band of un-merry men obviously do and sadly almost a million voters who think the BNP are standing up for the rights and that the country’s problems will be solved by tightening up the borders.

If that were ever to happen you can rest assured that the haters would soon find something or someone else to hate, those with large noses, red hair, or will it be more obvious targets like homosexuals and lesbians?

We all know that Nick Griffin thinks that gays and lesbians should be tolerated but not given ‘special treatment’ which means that any notion of basic equality or human rights will go ‘straight’ (forgive the pun) down the drain.

I know for a fact that some gays and lesbians support the BNP, I’ve had disturbing conversations with right wing poofs and dykes and in my opinion they are like vegetarian butchers. Right wing gays take self loathing to a brand new level and if you meet one please poke them in the eye!

Whatever minority you come from, Black, Asian, White, Queer, Transgender, Swinger, Dogger, Fluffy, Sex Worker, etc, ect, think on! You’d be wise to watch your back when it comes to the likes of the BNP because once they’ve dealt with the job stealers and economy crunchers they might come for you and me!

Leaving aside the nonsense about britishness (he also made a spelling mistake), it’s clear that Boy George is proof of what is wrong in this country.

He incites people to attack any gay who support the BNP, maybe a complaint should be made to the Police for incitement to commit an assault.

He fails to understand that the homosexuals who support us are decent people who want to keep their lifestyle private and don’t want to impose it on others.

Maybe what is more disturbing is using his celebrity status to promote his perversion, and maybe he supports the legalization of paedophilia.

This would hardly be surprising as many politicians want to reduce the age of consent.

Interestingly he has a flat in Shoreditch, east London.

This is an area in which asian youths carried out homophobic assaults that MSM refused to report, because they didn’t want to upset the Muslim community.

Maybe he should ask Muslims and Blacks what they think of homosexuality and how they are treated in their countries.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

At the time when Britain is almost bankrupt it’s essential to cut wasteful spending.

A good place to start is by stopping spending money on immigrants and asylum seekers and closing down the race relation industry.

This is why Sheffield council deserve credit for ending funding to the Sheffield Racial Equality Council.

Members of the equality body held a demonstration outside the Town Hall – but failed to persuade councillors to restore the organisation’s £120,000 annual budget.

The organisation held the protest before its representatives quizzed Lib Dem councillors about the decision to cease funding.

Protesters were joined by Paul Blomfield, Labour prospective parliamentary candidate for Sheffield Central.

He said: For 42 years Sheffield Race Equality Council has played an important role in challenging racism and supporting those facing discrimination. It’s completely wrong for the council to pull the Race Equality Council’s funding and withdraw its support, particularly at a time when race relations have been put under strain after the election of a BNP MEP.”

SREC chairman Mohammed Nazir said: “What will happen to equal opportunities? Can the council give assurances that it can fulfil its requirements to black and minority communities and provide evidence this will happen?”

SREC manager Aisha Special K added: “At a time when racial tension and violence is on the increase, the council should be increasing its financial investment not withdrawing it.

“The decision will have an adverse impact upon the people of Sheffield, in particular people from minority communities.”

SREC, which provides advice services to the city’s black and ethnic minority residents, claims the council held a “flawed consultation process” and said it is now looking at taking the authority to a judicial review.

But Sheffield Council leader Coun Paul Scriven said the decision to stop funding was right – because he does not believe the organisation currently delivers sufficient value for money.

He said: “At the moment SREC gets £120,000 a year. A lot goes in overheads, a manager, administration worker, rent and rates. Last year, it dealt with 44 cases.

“The council does not fund organisations but services. We are committed to continuing the service SREC provides. A total of £40,000 to £45,000 a year will be set aside and SREC will be invited to tender for the work.

“If the organisation believes it is the best and can offer the council value for money, then it can forward a bid. SREC will be assessed against others and if it is the best and can reduce overheads, it will get the service.”

Native Britons never asked to be swamped with mass immigration and therefore there is not justification for having a race equality body in the first place.

It may be interesting to know if this decision was taken because Mark Collett is standing as a candidate against David Blunkett, the man who said a few years ago that there is no limit in the amount of immigration Britain can take.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Today newspapers reported.

A woman, seven months pregnant was “orally raped” at gunpoint by three robbers who burst into her London home.

The 33-year-old was watching TV with her boyfriend when the men struck at 10.30pm.

Her boyfriend, 39, was clubbed about the head and threatened with a sawn-off shotgun as the gang demanded the keys to their Audi TT car.

One of the men grabbed the woman and took her upstairs where she was forced to commit a sex act which police described as “oral rape”.

The assailant threatened to shoot her and her boyfriend if she did not do as she was told. The men then stole a mobile phone, iPod, cash, debit cards and laptop and escaped in the Audi parked outside the couple’s home in Finsbury Park.

Unfortunately violent crimes like this are now commonplace.

What is enlightening is the description of the suspects.
The man who carried out the “oral rape” is described as black, 6ft tall, aged 18 to 25 and stocky. He wore a black balaclava, black jacket and black tracksuit bottoms.

A second man was black or Asian, 5ft 6ins and about 18. He wore light grey tracksuit bottoms, black trainers and a zip-up jacket with red sleeves.

The third suspect, who wielded the gun, was black, 5ft 10ins, and aged between 18 and 22. He was wearing burgundy tracksuit bottoms.

Two men were caught on CCTV outside a mini-market at the corner of Seven Sisters Road and Durham Road in Holloway 10 minutes before the attack.

Now it will be interesting to find out if those three assailants were born in this country, are here illegally, or asylum seekers?

One of the uncomfortable truths is, that the greater proportion of violent crimes in London are carried out by immigrants, yet no one dare talk about it. The illiberal elite in charge of this country try to silence us by branding anyone who speaks the truth as racist.

The fact remains that this awful, and demeaning act may have been carried out by people who are not supposed to be here in the first place, a fact worth remembering, as government is forcing us to accept an ever increasing number of immigrants and threats of prosecution for anyone who complain about it.

The British National Party is not afraid to tell the truth about immigration, so it is incumbent on us to describe this as one of the negative effects brought upon this country by the disastrous policies implemented by Labour and Conservative governments in the last 50 odd years.

This is why it’s time for Nationalists to act, and direct their anger toward the mayor of London Boris Johnson, Barking MP Margaret Hodge, and Dagenham MP Jon Cruddas.

This wicked trio are but the latest generation of those responsible for these, and other crimes, (violent or otherwise) committed by immigrants and they must bear the consequences of their decisions.

They want to give an amnesty to the 1 million or so illegal immigrants living in London, increase the number of foreigners allowed to live and work in the UK, and won’t miss an opportunity to threaten anyone who disagrees with their plan.

Not all the immigrants are criminal but almost all our elected politicians in Westminster are.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Mass immigration is not just a British problem as all the west is under threat. So no-one should be amazed to hear that Finland is now a destination for immigrants and asylum seekers, in a country that had hardly any immigrants a few years ago.

The difficult language and the harsh climate acted as a strong deterrent as there are plenty of places that are more appealing. However things started to change in the last few years where an increasing number of refugees have been allowed in that country.

The Finnish Immigration Service (Migri) has said in a recent statement that the number of asylum applications in Finland is on course to reach record levels this year. By the end of July, a total of 2,700 people had applied for asylum here since January. If the rate of applications is maintained, more than 5,000 people will have applied by the end of the year – an increase of over 1,000 year on year.

Most asylum seekers are originally from Iraq or Somalia, although the number of Iraqi refugees has decreased recently. In part, this decrease can be attributed to new policies in the immigration service, which no longer considers applicants from certain regions of Iraq to be automatically entitled to asylum.

The reason for the increase in immigration is obvious as Finland has a generous welfare system and a political elite committed to turning a peaceful and mono-ethnic country in a multiracial hellhole. In fact already many Finns are upset by this change imposed on them. It’s true that now immigrants make up only 2.5% of the population but this can change soon and they are well aware how this inflow can increase exponentially.

So far this has helped the True Finns Party, a nationalist party who is committed to maintaining Finland’s generous welfare system and see immigration and the EU as a threat to Finnish society.

In the latest EU election True Finns got 9.8% and an MEP, its leader Timo Soini, sitting in the Europe of Freedom and Democracy Group, together with UKIP MEP Nigel Farage. Unsurprisingly supporters of that party have been accused of being racist and xenophobic and the main Finnish parties, like their British counterparts, keep telling voters lies about the benefits of mass immigration and multiculturalism.

An example is the trial of Jussi Alla-aho, a Finnish slavic linguist, blogger and politician (he is a councillor in Helsinki) who is under trial for incitement of racial hatred. In his blog, Scripta, he criticised the number of immigrants coming to Finland and claimed that Muslims cannot be integrated.

In the meantime ordinary citizens are starting to get organized. An internet based group plans to establish a new political party known as “Change 2011” with the aim of challenging current policies on immigration. The group now plans to collect the required 5,000 names needed to gain a place on the register of political parties.

According to the group’s leader Juha Mäki-Ketelä, it aims to win three seats in parliament in elections to be held in 2011. The group claims its objectives include the prevention of immigration for economic advantage. It also wants a referendum on the issue of immigration.

Mäki-Ketälä says the group will target those members of the True Finns Party who are critical of current immigration policy.

With luck Finnish will start to wake up and stop this globalist madness well before Finland will become a broken country like the UK.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share