Never before in the history of the British National Party started in 1982 has the expression ‘playing by the rules’ been so relevant. In the heat of politics, people very often forget that, regardless of personal views, we must always stick to fairplay and proper behaviour. The Romans had another expression: Res, Non Verba (Facts, Not Words). When we face the courts of justice and the courts of public opinion we must remember that there are many rules that we might unwittingly ignore, sometimes simply because we are not forcefully aware of the entire legal framework. Whatever justifications we might think that we have, the said justifications could even work against us. Sometimes remorse or publicly expressed regret can be used as evidence of guilt and wrongdoing.

When I joined the British National Party almost ten years ago, I made a conscious decision to play by the rules. I was painfully aware of the fact that individual weaknesses can lead to the demise of an entire organization. During the recent nomination process for the leadership election, I stood outside the said process with the aim of being absolutely impartial to protect something that is more precious than any individual political ambitions. Before all individual political ambitions, the British National Party comes first because without a British National Party our hopes and aspirations would be dead in the water.

I do not criticize any of my fellow party members. They all had their own individuals reasons, their own individual justifications, to do what they did and to adopt the positions they have adopted. But, as I have stated before, reasons and justifications come a cropper when confronted with facts that contradict them. So this is a time to be reasonable and to be patient for, in the end, facts will speak for themselves. After the Storm, we will have to pick up the pieces to continue fighting for what we believe.

I have also become aware of the fact that personal circumstances, very private circumstances, are stopping some of our peoples from performing to the best of their abilities. When things go right, we all congratulate ourselves. When things go wrong, it is the time for understanding and it is the time to redouble our efforts to keep the family together.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

One of the arguments used by the antifascists to deter people voting BNP is to deliver smear leaflets accusing BNP councillors of being useless, ineffective and failing to attend meetings.

Nationalists know that there are BNP councillors that are hardworking but the MSM never say a word about them as this would be against the NUJ guidelines.

Luckily most councils have a copy of the annual report on their website and everyone can see how many meetings a councillor actually attended in a given local authority.

In Morley Town Council BNP councillor Joanna Beverley has the best record attendance as she went to all the council meetings.

However what is interesting about this local authority is that the councillors that regularly attack Mrs Beverley have such a poor attendance record.

Morley Borough Independent councillors Richard and Helen Benson were the very worst of a bad MBI bunch. The pair failed to attend a single Council meeting, and only managed to avoid being booted off the council due to non-attendance by dragging themselves along to a few committee meetings. In the case of Richard Benson, this meant attending 2 out of 14 meetings of the Finance and General Purposes Committee.

Helen Benson attended one out of the 10 meetings of the Morley Entertainments Sub-Committee and 2 of the 14 meetings of the Community Development Committee.

The combined Benson attendance at committee or council meetings for the 2009-10 year was a laughable 9.6%.

Fellow MBI Party councillors Mary Hicks and Judith Elliott also attended less than half of the council meetings held, and for many of Morley’s ‘independents’ things got even worse at committee level.

Judith Elliott, for example, managed to turn up to a single meeting of the Civic Duties Sub-Committee, and missed the other eleven. Terence Grayshon attended two out of fourteen Community Development Committee meetings and failed to attend a single one of the ten meetings of the Morley Entertainments Sub-Committee.

Nationalists can look at the link below to find out more:

Morley Patriot

Well done to Joanna Beverley let’s hope voters take notice and re-elect her.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

There must be something wrong with Trevor Phillips, the Guyana-born chief of the EHRC.

First he started legal action against the British National Party because our constitution didn’t allow non-whites to become members and forced us to change this.

Never mind that there is a principle called freedom of association, a basic human right that give individuals free choice to whom they choose to associate with, but we all know this was just an excuse for the establishment to destroy us (and by the way, how many blacks and Asians would join anyway?).

However even this was not enough, and now Herr Phillips is threatening to jail BNP Chairman Nick Griffin for contempt of court because some parts of our political programme may indirectly discriminate against minorities.

But just like a drug addict needing stronger stuff to stay high, Phillips needs to find new targets to satisfy his thirst for power.

Apparently the EHRC said it was considering whether to take the Treasury to court.

The quango said it feared Chancellor George Osborne had not investigated the impact of his Budget on vulnerable groups – such as women, the elderly, the disabled and ethnic minorities – as legally required.

The Treasury is also facing legal action from women’s rights group the Fawcett Society, which says ministers took no account of the Budget’s effect on women.

It comes a day after the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a highly respected think-tank, said Mr Osborne’s financial changes were ‘clearly regressive’, hitting the poor and families with children hardest.

This contradicts official claims from the Chancellor and his Lib Dem allies that the budget was ‘fair’ and ‘progressive’.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, facing increasing clamour from his Lib Dem backbenchers, was forced to defend the Budget.

‘This IFS analysis is by definition partial,’ he said. ‘It does not include the things we want to do to get people off benefits and into work.’

Mr Clegg, whose personal and party poll ratings have fallen through the floor in recent weeks, said the Government’s plans also included a pupil premium to improve education opportunities for poorer children and further changes to the tax system.

But Mike Hancock, Lib Dem MP for Portsmouth South, said: ‘We didn’t sign up for a Coalition that was going to hurt the poorest people in society, and I certainly didn’t get elected to do that ever.’

He said that unless Mr Clegg came up with a good answer to the IFS report, there would be a ‘very sticky’ upcoming Lib Dem party conference and serious thinking by members generally’.

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission said one option being considered was applying for a judicial review into the Budget, while another was sending in a hit squad to work with Treasury civil servants on equality issues.

Neil Kinghan, the quango’s chief executive, said equalities legislation was ‘not designed to prevent reductions in public expenditure’, adding: ‘Its role, and the commission’s role, is to ensure fairness is at the heart of decisions.’

He said the commission had asked the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, for assurances, but had received no response.

Asked on the BBC’s Today show if an equality impact assessment had been carried out, Treasury minister Mark Hoban declined to comment.

Labour leadership contender David Miliband said: ‘This report reveals George Osborne’s Budget was soft on the banks, hard on the poor.’

Shadow Chancellor Alistair Darling said: ‘Nick Clegg is talking nonsense. He might think he can take his party for fools, but the British public can see all too clearly that there’s nothing fair about this Coalition.’

Now there is a lot to be said against the budget even if some bits, like the reform of the benefit system, should be supported because there are too many scroungers living on benefits rather than looking for a job, but this is not the point.

Whatever you think of this coalition the fact is that an unelected and unaccountable quango shouldn’t be allowed to interfere in government policies and tell elected politicians what he/she should or shouldn’t do.

And by the way since when did Trevor Phillips become concerned about the plight of the poor?

The only thing he cares about is turning Britain in a third world hell-hole and use (or better abuse) his power to harass and prosecute any organization which dares stand up for the interests of indigenous Britons.

Maybe George Osborne should follow the suggestion made by Spiked, an online magazine run by far-left Jewish.

In spite of their hatred for the BNP they were outspoken in condemning the legal action taken against us by the EHRC as they saw not only an unacceptable violation of a basic human right but the introduction of fascism by the back door.

“They first come to the ‘racists’” was the warning that politicians in Westminster decided to ignore and now Mr Phillips is coming to them.

What goes around comes around.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Several branches, including those in Central London and in the outskirts of London have reported rising hostility and bullying against activists during leafleting rounds. I have been asked by a Central London organiser to publish a letter detailing what is happennig in his area, but we cannot deal with this situation as a separate set of events. We need an across the board response and this is why I have asked for an organic solution to deal with the issues.

I will not go into details of what is being done at this very minute to deter any kind of hostile activities by focusing on those who are found to be the source of the said hostile activities.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Barking & Dagenham council is in dire financial straits.

The 51 Labour councillors need to save £42m over the next four years, council workers are already starting to bear the brunt as salaries are now frozen, overtime payments suspended, and by the end of the year 150 of them will be thrown out of work.

But, the council still manages to find the money to spend over £3m on salaries for 31 council chiefs.

Corporate and Divisional Directors are paid in excess of £100,000 a year each, with Heads of Services slightly behind on up to £93,000 annually.

Acting chief executive, David Woods takes home £145,000 a year excluding expenses.

Corporate Directors like Darren Henaghan (Customer Services) and Helen Jenner (Children Services) are the next highest paid, earning up to £132,000 annually.

Divisional Directors such as Nina Clark (Legal & Democratic Services) and Chris Pelham (Safeguarding & Rights) are paid a salary of £110,000 – £116,000.

In total up to £3,245,000 is spent on the wages of 31 people each year.

Before he left the council former boss Bob Whiteman took home a £189,000 pay packet.

To be fair, compared to other councils in London, the amount of money spent on B&D high level civil servants is not outrageous .
Newham borough council chief Joe Duckworth earned £241,000 last year, and Tower Hamlets a few weeks ago attracted a lot of criticism when it emerged that its top earning officials took home £18m between them last year.

So when a council needs to make big savings, targeting the salary of the highest paid civil servants should be the priority and that is why the British National Party wanted to peg civil servant’ salaries to £60,000.

Had this measure been implemented the council would have saved £1,385,000, enough to save maybe 40 council jobs.

Unfortunately voters believed the lies spread by antifascist groups that if the BNP gained control of the council many would have lost their jobs.

The truth is that not only they are going to lose their jobs anyway but the scale of those losses will be bigger as Labour will never tackle wasteful expenditure.

How much money is wasted on politically correct projects?

One of these is the Race Equality Project, manufactured to ‘fight discrimination and promote community cohesion’.

I can reveal that Barking & Dagenham for the year 2010/2011 will give £62,600 to an organization called Harmony House.

Interesting to note that the year before it only received £31,300.

It appears to me, now that the BNP has been swept out of the council, Labour feels it is entitled to increase funding to HH by 100%, since with no opposition they need not explain to anyone why they have done it.

Sooner or later there will be cuts in essential services and voters will find out that under Labour things can only get worse not better, and when push comes to shove they will realise they have been conned, they will see what they have voted for, and put the BNP where it truly belongs…. In control of B&D!!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I am pleased to announce that that the police have informed me that charges of assault lodged against myself have been dropped. The charges stemmed from a racially motivated attack on British National Party Councillors and activists during which I was forced to defend myself.

The footage of the attack, which took place in the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham in May 2010 during local elections, by Muslim men was first shown on national news channels. Articles about the attack were carried in all the National Newspapers including the Daily Mail, Express, Sun and Mirror. Their websites also carried the original BBC footage. The attack footage can be viewed here on the Daily Mail website:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1273583/General-Election-2010-BNP-candidate-Bob-Bailey-filmed-fighting-Asian-men-key-battle-ground-Barking.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

The footage was also uploaded to YouTube where to date it has been viewed by about half a million people. The footage is a hot topic in many political and social forums. Posters, some not even inclined to vote BNP, have overwhelmingly agreed that a politician should be able to walk the streets and campaign during elections without fear of attack.

At the time of the attack the local Labour Party with its affiliate the ‘Searchlight Group’, organised by Trotskyist Nick Lowles, had delivered to houses in the borough a number of leaflets designed to whip up racial hatred against white British people and create a climate of fear amongst the large African and Muslim groups recently settled in the borough. The stated aim of Nick Lowles and the Labour party was to create a climate in which it would be difficult for the BNP, Conservatives and other parties to physically campaign on the ground. As in previous elections the strategy was to deny the ground to other parties as the Labour party did not have enough resources to put in a full and proper campaign.

The reason I believe the CPS and the Police dropped the charges against myself and my Muslim attackers is not because they felt I was in the right defending myself from attack it is because any court appearance would have forced Labour and the Conservatives to defend their failed polices of Immigration and Multiculturalism. The incident which occurred in Barking clearly shows that whole areas of Britain are not only no go areas for politicians but no go areas for white British people as well.

The fanatical drive for a multicultural Britain decided by a few and heaped on many without a vote or honest debate has been a complete disaster for this country and the British people. Racial and cultural segregation, sharia courts, terrorist attacks, the treating of women as second class citizens, forced marriages and circumcision, and grooming of under age girls for sex and prostitution have no place in Britain. It is up to the citizens of this country to stop this rot and to make a stand against these extremists and foreign colonisers.

Robert Bailey

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Recently I became aware of the fact that certain websites had published a libellous set of assumptions regarding an article I wrote some years ago. I tried to address the issue by writing to the Press Complaints Commission that said that they had no authority to put things right.

Being a Communist is no excuse to be ignorant, but this is something that does not apply to the authors of the said publication that show absolute ignorance regarding the history of Latin America and about how countries like Uruguay and Argentina came to exist.

Both countries were once part of what was called the Virreinato of the Rio de la Plata under Spanish Rule. The official name of Uruguay is Republica Oriental del Uruguay that in everyday English would mean ’Republic to the East of the Uruguay River’ . The inhabitants of Uruguay used to be seen as Eastern Argentine and they shared a common history.

The present country known as Uruguay came to be because of British mediation between beligerant parties – Argentina and Brazil. At a conference in Rio de Janeiro in 1828, a buffer State was created to put an end to a military conflict. All this is history that the said authors of the said publication don’t seem to have a clue about.

Next they say that my family owned slaves. Well, many landowner families during the colonial period in the American Continent owned slaves. I, personally, do not own any slaves. Having lived in Britain, I don’t think British laws would allow me to keep slaves. This is yet another fact that the Communist idiots seem to have overlooked.

Like most empires, including the British Empire, the Spanish Empire, the Portuguese Empire and others, they profitted from slavery and slavery was then one of the tools of colonisation since without manpower the British, the Spanish, the Portuguese and others could not have achieved the aims of empire. Another fact that the Marxist weirdoes also seem to ignore with their delluded concepts about history.

Thomas Jefferson, Third President of the United States and one of the main authors of the Declaration of Independence of 1776 and other very much admired historic figures owned slaves in what became the United States of America and this was very much the case of many colonial landowner families not just in North America but also in other parts of the American Continent.

The said publication then accuses me of having ‘killed British soldiers in the South Atlantic War of 1982. They imply this without any factual information to prove what they say and acting only on the basis of their distorted views.  This is the icing on the cake that goes to show how delluded they are since in fact I never set foot on any British territories before 1989. Their comments in this regard are absolutely libellous.

They then accused me of having a Nazi past.  Given the fact that Nazi Germany came to an end in 1945 and that I was born in 1957, it would have been extremely difficult for me to have had a Nazi past and they should know that Dr. Who is just a television series made for the BBC. 

There is a distinction between being ‘Pro-Nazi’ and being ‘Pro-German’ . Having said that, the confusion of our Marxist friends is understandable given their obvious levels of ignorance. There were German interests in Latin America long before World War Two.

In actual fact, Germans were involved in education, science, farming and hydroelectric infrastructure in the very same way the British built the railways, were in charge of banking, insurance, gas and meat processing, amongst other economic activities. So World War Two divided entire families and loyalties were divided and this had nothing to do with Nazism. 

In the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s, Latin America, and in particular the River Plate Region, was the scene of guerrilla activity and I make no bones about declaring on which side of the conflict I was. Had not been for the military, to the delight of my detractors most countries in Latin America would have been turned into Eastern European Style Oppressive Regimes. Examples are much too obvious and well-known to be mentioned.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It seems that my articles on this blog are touching a few nerves in Barking & Dagenham.

Nationalists will recall, that a few weeks ago I wrote an article about the axing of Building Schools for the Future, a project to build new schools or renovate existing ones.

In that article I stated that this was excellent news as it will make it more difficult for Labour to move more immigrants into the borough.

It seems that I have upset a lot of people.

First the leader of the council Liam Smith attacked me on Hope Not Hate and accused me and the BNP of ignoring the interests of local people.

This week the Barking & Dagenham Post (BD Post) published a letter that directly attacks me:

SARAH BROOKS

I would like to know who Sarah Brooks is, not least because there aren’t many people in Barking & Dagenham who visit the London Patriot.

Nonetheless I still stick to my comments because I don’t believe for one second I said anything wrong.

One of the reasons I took delight in these cuts is because the Labour Party created the problem in the first place.

On page 6 of the BD Post 23th June 2010, an article written by Sukran Sahin claimed that a 50% increase in birth rate and a surge in population have sent the school age population soaring in only seven years.

No one believes that the data provided in the article is wrong, and any long-term resident of the borough can confirm that in the last few years there has been a huge demographic change.

Therefore Mrs Brook should explain why the birth rate has increased by 50%.

Surely it’s not because local people suddenly wanted to have big families.

It’s a well known fact that the reason Labour allowed so many immigrants to move here was because they wanted to dilute the electoral base of the British National Party, and therefore it’s Labour that created this problem in the first place.

In the same article Jon Cruddas, the Labour MP for Dagenham and Rainham South, complained that a shortage of school places will make the borough a less attractive place for young families to move in.

This confirms my point, that those investments are sought because they want more people to move into Barking & Dagenham and carry on the ethnic cleansing of the white British who live there.

Anyone can go to the BD Post’ website and see this article, I didn’t invent anything.

The truth is that if Labour had not swamped the borough with immigrants we wouldn’t need to invest more money in schools, a fact that is evident to all BNP supporters.

However there is another point I would like to make.

There is a widespread belief that education can be improved by investing more money and therefore what is needed is to increase spending.

I think this is wrong because more investment in new schools won’t necessarily bring an improvement in education.

Of course no one can deny that having more facilities and more equipment can affect the quality of teaching but people deceive themselves if they think that this is the silver bullet that will solve everything.

If you look at the root problems in our schools (lack of discipline, unqualified teachers, political correctness to name a few) you can see how they can be addressed without any increase in spending because they have nothing to do with funding.

If this was the case why in the last 13 years in spite of an increase in spending the quality of education has gotten worse?

And why are there still many students who leave school unable to read, write or count?

I will write a letter of reply to Sarah Brook even though I doubt it will be published.

In the meantime I still find it quite amazing that the Labour party, which now has no opposition, feel upset by something I wrote in a blog that very few people read anyway.

It seems I’m putting pressure on them and if this is the case I’m glad, as clearly I became an unofficial shadow councillor and if they are attacking me this means I’m doing something right.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

From Simon Darby blog

I don’t know about you but my Romanian is somewhat shaky. Nevertheless not to be intimidated I’m providing an article for you from the latest edition of “Informatia Zilei”: (machine translation somewhat lacking in the syntax and grammar area, but you will get the point) ed.

BNP accuses the EU freedom of movement for “the wave of crimes” of the Romanian Gypsies in M. Kingdom
Written by Max Mioara, August 2, 2010

EU rules on free movement allow citizens to have total freedom of movement within Member States, finds British National Party in a statement entitled “EU rules on free movement caused ‘crime wave’ of the Romanian Gypsies in M. Kingdom”
“Almost immediately” after the EU accession, Romanian police has been requested by the British authorities
to investigate a series of criminal gangs because of a wave of crime “from Roma to Britain, says the party BNP (British National Party), considered an extreme-right party, present since last year in Parliament. Party, which was awarded a nationalist-fascist ideology, and is led by Nick Griffin has never managed to enter the British Parliament.
Roma crime massive scale was realized after a newspaper published information about a gang of Romanian Gypsies who have trafficked to Britain over 200 children to beg, steal and commit petty crimes, says BNP.
Romanian Gypsies – which draws attention to BNP, not to be confused with real Romanian, who are law-abiding Europeans – are part of an Indian tribe that has entered Eastern Europe long ago.
Romanian citizens are allowed to come to Britain from January 1, 2007, recalls the BNP. In the first six months of the year, police statistics showed that “Romanian citizens” are responsible for 1,080 cases of crime. During the same period of 2006, had recorded only 135 such cases. Incredibly, Romanian authorities reported that crime rates fell to their country, because gypsies have export activities in M. Kingdom, underlines BNP.
BNP Press cites a statement by Stan Bîtlan, Ialomita police chief, who said that “there is a connection between what happens here (in Romania – No) and the UK. No matter what they in the UK, appears here in Romania, as luxury cars and houses, “the Romanian official said.
Tandarei mayor, where he held the latest police operation, said in 2007 that there was a decrease in crime in his city, showing BNP.
A secret document from the Interior Ministry press arrived in 2007 estimated that 45,000 potential criminals from Romania and Bulgaria have arrived in Britain, British nationalists recall, on Tuesday.
In the latest incident, 26 gypsies were arrested in connection with gangs Tandarei trafficked children. Prisoners risk being charged with child trafficking, money laundering, criminal association with a group organized and illegal possession of weapons. Children were under the control of a gang member in the UK and were used to “earn money” by begging, washing windshields, thefts from pockets and shops, exemplified in the closing communique BNP.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Richard Edmonds speaking at Bromley and Lewisham branch meet.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Life is getting tough for Labour in Barking & Dagenham.

We have already reported that the axing of the £270,000,000 Building Schools for the Future programme will mean B & D council has to scrap the building or renovation of ten schools, so it won’t meet the increase in demand for school places.

We need not remind you that it was Labour who created the problem in the first place when they decided to swamp the borough with immigrants in order to dilute the electoral base of the British National Party.

This gerrymandering was successful, but after the gain there is the pain.

Apparently the council has lost £5.5m in government funding and so it must add this figure to the £36,000,000 expenditure cuts already planned for the next four years.

As part of its many cash cutting measures the council has placed a virtual freeze on recruitment and is employing staff only when absolutely necessary.

But the most interesting development is that 150 council jobs will be lost this year, mostly through voluntary severance.

Nationalists will remember that during the electoral campaign antifascist groups delivered leaflets claiming that if the BNP gained the control of the council, essential services would be cut and many people would lose their jobs.

It was a lie, what a pity the voters of B & D believed it because they will be losing their jobs anyway.

Before sacking non essential council workers we would have targeted wasteful expenditure, (such as closing down the council-run newspaper, ending funding to immigrant groups and politically correct projects) and reduced the obscene amount of money paid to senior fat-cat civil servants, and if redundancies were unavoidable, then the chopper would have been used on those leeches with the non -jobs.

Because Labour will not target wasteful expenditure the pain will be so much greater, because the announced 150 job losses are only the start, many more redundancies will follow.

To our advantage this will help get BNP councillors elected in 2014.

The more Labour make uncomfortable decisions, the greater the number of voters who will be prepared to vent their anger on them and the signs are that it is beginning.

Most voted to keep the BNP out because they feared for their jobs, but in 2014 this will not be the case, hundreds will have lost their job by then as the council’ workforce is downsized.

I suspect that a great many of those sacked workers will change their minds and realise the error made in 2010, they may join the BNP supporters who are also angry, and believe they have been treated unfairly because what is more unfair than telling workers that the council cannot afford to employ them, when at the same time it can find £500,000 for a useless council newspaper?

Let’s hope that the day of reckoning starts sooner rather than later.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Nationalists will remember how Richard Barnbrook, when he was a BNP councillor, shot a video in which he claimed three murders took place in Barking & Dagenham.

Afterward he realised he had made a mistake but the purpose of that video was to raise awareness of the problem of gang-related crime, a common occurrence in London and the rest of the UK.

However as the establishment is committed to stop the British National Party by any means at their disposal it was inevitable that both the Great London Assembly and Barking & Dagenham town hall would start disciplinary action against Mr Barnbrook.

Well, we are happy to report that London Assembly member Richard Barnbrook won his appeal against Barking and Dagenham Council after a tribunal ruled he had made the claim as a City Hall politician rather than a councillor. This meant he was not in breach of the council code of conduct and therefore his one-month council suspension has been quashed.

Barking and Dagenham Council is understood to have spent between £15,000 and £20,000 investigating Mr Barnbrook after his video was posted online in September 2008. He said his dyslexia had made him blunder on the YouTube video.

City Hall ruled he had brought the Greater London Authority into disrepute following a standards hearing in September 2009.

The City Hall findings stand as he withdrew his appeal against the GLA. Mr Barnbrook served his council suspension in October 2009.

This is another victory for the British National Party and it sent a clear signal that we will continue to tell the truth and we will not tolerate any form of intimidation or attempts to silence us.

Nonetheless it’s important to focus on the cost of this state-sponsored harassment.

Barking & Dagenham is in dire financial condition (it must save £43m in the next three years) and deep cuts in frontline services are expected as well as many lay-offs of council staff, but in spite of that Labour felt entitled to waste between £15,000 – £20,000 of taxpayers money to persecute an elected politician because he dared to tell the truth about gang-related crime.

It may be interesting to know how this money was spent, if someone got paid to offer legal advice and if a cost-benefit assessment was carried out.

As the only purpose of this disciplinary action was to satisfy the vanity of some members of the Labour party, maybe it’s time that either Labour councillors or the Labour party dug deep in their pockets to refund taxpayers.

You couldn’t make it up..

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The professional black female politician avoids the questions again.
Wellll Andrew, umm, welll, ummm, struck dumb were you Diane?
You have got an awful lot to say about the ‘rascist’ BNP, but when it comes to you being pilloried, you can only say, well Andrew I have nothing to say about anything that relates to my little bunces.

West Indian mums will got to the wall for their children? I am sure she has… she sent her son to a private school in order to avoid her little boy mixing with the plebs… Blah blah blah I have nothing to say… Andrew I have nothing to say…. blah blah. The tables were turned on you weren’t they, at last Andrew gets his nose out of her **** and gives her a roasting.
This person wants to be leader of ZanuLabour? She will be a perfect substitute for the place men that led ZanuL in the past.
I honestly hope she is elected, it will cast the Stasi party into the wilderness for decades.

“May God grant them a thousand lives”, to die again and again.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I take a vicarious pleasure in seeing traitors like Jon Cruddas running scared.

The Dagenham & Rainham South MP it would seem is extremely concerned that cuts in funding for new schools will mean that fewer are going to be built in Barking & Dagenham.

In an interview with the Barking & Dagenham Post, (BD Post) the Labour MP complained that austerity measures are going to affect children and their families, and the borough can ill afford it because in the last seven years the birth rate has increased by 50%, and more immigrant families and their children are moving to the borough.

Mr Cruddas as always was hesitant to admit that he and his party had created the problem in the first place.

It’s a known fact that when the BNP had 12 councillors elected in 2006 the Labour Party pulled out all the stops to increase the number of immigrants in the borough to dilute BNP support.

This swamping of the borough and huge increase in population (demographic change) has placed public services under enormous strain resulting in local families finding it increasingly difficult to get their children into a school near their homes.

So long as the population increases (and don’t forget that most immigrant families tend to have more children than indigenous ones) there will always be a shortage of places, no matter how many schools are built.

However unfair this budget, the truth is that without demographic change there would be no shortage of school places. Idiot Cruddass and his scummy labour party created this problem. The blame lies solely at their door.

But what really worries Jon Cruddas (and he admitted it to the BD post) is that without those schools, young (enriching) families will have no incentive in moving to Barking & Dagenham.

This means that the white British may still be the majority in four years time, when local elections are to be held, and if the ‘natives’ awake then the BNP may well regain the seats it lost on May the 6th.

Not only will Labour have fewer enriching voters, some having departed again for sunnier climes, but it might lose the support of the huge number of council workers that Labour have also betrayed.

They feared a BNP controlled council would sack many of them, and so they mobilised the electorate to vote Labour, but as the council is almost bankrupt they will probably be fired anyway.

A distant prospect but it is to be hoped that Cruddas and his assorted cronies have serious nightmares.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

A few days ago we reported that the Alliance of European Nationalist Movements (AENM), a pan-European party made up of nationalist parties have chosen to work together at a European level.

On the 16th and 17th of June, the AENM held its first General Assembly in Strasbourg.

The Chairman Bruno Gollnisch set up the agenda and drew the position the AENM will take in the near future. The General Assembly then proceeded to renew the “Bureau”, the political leadership of the party namely, the President (Bruno Gollnisch), Vice-President (Nick Griffin), Treasurer (Bela Kovacs) and General Secretary (Valerio Cignetti).

The assembly then deliberated on the enlargement of the party by accepting applications from the “Partido Nacional Renovador” and “Nationaldemokraterna” to join the AENM increasing the total number of represented Nations to nine.

The full list of the members is now:

- Front National (France)

- Jobbik (Hungary)

- Fiamma Tricolore (Italy)

- British National Party (Great Britain)

- Svoboda (Ukraine)

- Movimiento Social Republicano (Spain)

- Front National du Belgique (Belgium)

- Partido Nacional Renovador (Portugal)

- Nationaldemokraterna (Sweden)

The appointment of Nick Griffin as Vice-President is an acknowledgment of his talent and his dedication to nationalism.

Mr Griffin is well known outside Britain and many party leaders in Europe respect him for turning the BNP into the most feared political party in Britain.

How effective the AENM will be is difficult to judge, but if Mr Griffin in his new position of Vice President can replicate, even in a small way what he has achieved for the BNP, you can expect shockwaves across the EU.

So should nationalists thank Margaret Hodge?

Her landslide victory gave our Chairman more time to concentrate on the new AENM project, and make an even bigger impact at the European level.

Mrs Hodge urged BNP members to pack their bags and leave, and this is what Mr Griffin did: he left Barking to go to Brussels and Strasbourg where he will stay until 2014.

How does the old saying go?
“Be careful what you wish for”?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The white hater and serial liar Noor Ramjanally has miraculously escaped incarceration since his lies were found out. He is now believed to be at home in Mauritius after his successful economic sojourn in our fair islands, to which he was welcomed as an illegal immigrant after overstaying as a tourist and being given all the benefits that the NuLabour government could bestow on him.
Why was a suspect in a criminal act out on bail allowed to remove himself from the justice system without the knowledge of the Border Control Agency?
I was under the impression that the protection of our country was in the hands of the Sherriff’s, and not the cowboys!!! And what does the presiding Judge do?

The jury were told by Judge Karen Walden-Smith ‘not to carry out independent research’. LMHOPMSL.

Before his trial at Chelmsford Crown Court, he sent police a taunting email from the Indian Ocean island, telling them: ‘I am enjoying the sun.’

By Andrew Hough
Published: 8:00AM BST 09 Jun 2010
The 36 year-old (liar, Noor Ramjanally) falsely claimed he was abducted at knifepoint by racist thugs from the far-right wing political party after being subjected to hate mail and an arson attack, Chelmsford Crown Court was told.
He had told police he had feared for his life when he was kidnapped in broad daylight from his home in Loughton, Essex on August 24 last year and bundled into a car, it was claimed.
Ramjanally then claimed he was driven to nearby Epping Forest where he was threatened and warned to stop holding prayer sessions he had organised falsely claimed he was abducted at knifepoint by racist thugs from the far-right wing political party after being subjected to hate mail and an arson attack, Chelmsford Crown Court was told.
He had told police he had feared for his life when he was kidnapped in broad daylight from his home in Loughton, Essex on August 24 last year and bundled into a car, it was claimed.
Ramjanally then claimed he was driven to nearby Epping Forest where he was threatened and warned to stop holding prayer sessions he had organised.
But he was caught out lying after detectives viewed CTTV footage from secret cameras installed to protect him after his previous claims that he was being targeted by racist opponents, prosecutors said.
The court heard that at the time of his alleged abduction he was actually “wandering around Homebase”.
Ramjanally, a married father of one, stood trial in his absence on Tuesday charged with one count of perverting the course of justice.
The jury were not told why he did not attend court and were warned by Judge Karen Walden-Smith not to carry out independent research.
Matthew Gowan, prosecuting, told the court that Ramjanally’s story about the alleged kidnapping was “complete bunkum”.
He said that Ramjanally had made up his claims in a call to police that he had been taken by force and later threatened to stop holding Muslim prayer groups.
The court was told that he was one of a group of people who had formed the Islamic community groups, which had allegedly created a “background of tension” that he blamed the BNP for whipping up.
After he had founded the groups several months earlier, he reported a number of incidents to police including a “malicious letter, abuse in the street and a firebomb attack on the front door of his flat.
Mr Gowan said after being released without harm Ramjanally told the media that he believed the far right British National party were responsible for his kidnap.
“It was complete bunkum. He didn’t know one crucial piece of information, a vital piece of the jigsaw puzzle,” Mr Gowan told the court.
“Because of the tensions in the area and the allegations he made during the summer, police were worried about his own safety and unbeknown to him, in order to prevent and detect crime they placed covert secret CCTV cameras in the flat where he lived.
“The prosecution case is that at the time of this abduction was said to have taken place Mr Ramjanally can be shown to be somewhere else.”
He added: “Nothing particular was happening. There is footage of him leaving his flat on his own, going down the stairs on his own and he takes a taxi to Homebase.”
Mr Gowan said that after trawling the CCTV footage, police discovered Ramjanally had walked to the spot on the edge of the forest, where he claimed he was taken by the BNP, where he was seen dialling 999.
The jury were also shown footage from two hidden cameras at his home before he made the call that showed Ramjanally leaving his home, getting into a taxi and being driven to Homebase.
After his arrest Ramjanally told police in a statement that he had got a taxi to Homebase and had walked home before being abducted. But Mr Gowan said that timing did not fit in with the evidence.
Ramjanally denied the charge at an earlier hearing.
The trial continues.

Not anymore it doesn’t

AWOL ‘victim’ Noor Ramjanally jailed for lying about BNP kidnapping 12/06/2010
A muslim leader yesterday given a jail term for falsely claiming to have been kidnapped by BNP members is thought to be in his native Mauritius after skipping bail.
Noor Ramjanally, 36, was sentenced in his absence to two years (laying on a Mauritian beach) after a jury at Chelmsford crown court, Essex, found him guilty of perverting justice.
A judge heard he made up his tale of a knifepoint abduction from Loughton, Essex.

As Guisseppe would say, you couldn’t make it up!!!

They seek him here, they seek him there, that darned elusive liying Ramalangadingdong Noor.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Like many nationalists I have nothing but contempt for The Guardian ( I am sure the feeling is mutual).

Now the marxist, anti-British traitors who write for this useless rag are starting a campaign to offer an amnesty for all the MPs who abused the expense’ system.

The article below is a laughable piece of nonsense but it’s worth a read:

Four MPs and one peer face criminal charges over their alleged abuse of parliamentary expenses. For them, justice must take its course. For everyone else, it is time that the hunt for scandal stopped. Our democracy has been corroded not just by the excesses of a minority, but also by the distrust that the behaviour and the reporting of it have created.

The general election marked a real as well as symbolic point of separation: new MPs, new expenses rules and – some hoped – a new relationship with the public. But David Laws’ downfall showed that expenses have a toxic half-life and that things done in the old parliament taint the new one. The Daily Telegraph, possessing old expenses records, can pursue any politician it chooses.

Only a very few claimed so little that there is nothing that can be made to look embarrassing. It does not matter if, as in the case of Danny Alexander, no rules were broken, or, as with David Laws, total expenses claims were below average. As MPs come to prominence in the new government, or on select committees, or on a revised Labour frontbench, they will become targets.

Only an amnesty can stop the destructive cycle by which the parliamentary standards commissioner is constantly called upon to mount complex (and expensive) inquiries. Some of these, at least, are being generated by enemies of democracy like the BNP. A Commons resolution, or a one-line law supported by all three main parties, should bring this to a close. The expenses scandal is over.

Why on earth The Guardian is defending those elected criminals is hard to say and I used the word criminals deliberately because what they did, even if legal, is unacceptable.

But what makes me sick is that they accuse BNP sleazebuster Michael Barnbrook of being an enemy of democracy because he made a complaint against them and started the The Daily Telegraph investigation into the expenses fiddles. (Not that the Torygraph will admit it)

However there is a question that needs to be asked: do they really believe that British people will support this amnesty?

We know the answer, so I need not comment further on that.

Maybe the person who got it right about those brain-dead liberals was the Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi when a few months ago he said, “the problem with communists and leftwingers is that they have a testicle instead of a brain” (para).

Many nationalists will agree with Mr Berlusconi.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Since the somewhat disappointing results of 6th May, the MSM has been happily crowing that the British National Party is now gone for good.

It’s a lie of course, and nationalists will be pleased to know that under the radar the BNP is shaping political agenda in the three main parties.

A few days ago we reported that a debate is taking place in left-wing circles about the need for the Labour party to get tougher on immigration.

Also Margaret Hodge, in an article published on the Daily Telegraph, after throwing her usual bile on us, she admitted, the only effective way to stop the BNP is by introducing a better system for rationing housing and benefits, with priority for those who have lived in an area for longest.

Now what is interesting about her comment is that no one attacked Mrs Hodge for pandering to the fascist BNP, let’s not forget she was rapped a few years ago when she suggested the council houses should be given only to people who lived in a borough for a very long time.

Clearly the Labour party are well aware that many voters agree with us on those issues, and they cannot ignore them because they know full well the BNP is still around and could get more votes in the future from those disillusioned voters.

A similar thing is happening in the Conservative party.

Broxbourne Tory MP Charles Walker has recently warned that uncontrolled immigration could lead to a rise in support for the far right. (not that the BNP is “far” right)

Speaking in the House of Commons Mr Walker said that while his constituents were “fair-minded, decent and compassionate people” he added “uncontrolled immigration is not an unalloyed good for everyone”.

He said: “Broxbourne constituent want skilled workers coming to this country who can add to the wealth of this country and pay taxes that help to support hospitals, schools and infrastructure. My constituents also want to provide genuine sanctuary to those who are in genuine fear for their lives. However, we have to recognise in this place that uncontrolled immigration is not an unalloyed good for everyone.”

He added: “Immigration tends to work very well for the middle and upper classes, but many of my constituents are competing for scarce public resources, such as education, health, transport and housing. That has created a level of concern and bad feeling which has caused me a great deal of concern, because in my constituency and others we still see the British National Party getting a foothold and gaining traction.”

He went on to congratulate Labour MPs Jon Cruddas and Margaret Hodge who “had such fantastic results against the British National party, not only turning back Nick Griffin, the leader of that party, but ensuring that night that many BNP councillors lost their seats”.

Mr Walker called for progress against the far right to continue, but said: “If we are to do so, our constituents need to know that we are serious about addressing their concerns.”

To put everything in perspective in Broxbourne the BNP candidate Steve McCole got 4.73% against the 58.79% obtained by Mr Walker.

No one would make a fuss about those figures, this is after all a safe Tory seat and our presence would have been unnoticed.

Instead we see an MP with a comfortable majority panicking about a party that got less that 5% and admitting (albeit indirectly) that state-sponsored harassment and smears will not stop us.

The fact that Mr Walker is scared of us says a lot about our power and the way we are influencing the political debate, thus dismissing the claim made by MSM that the BNP has been defeated for good.

As for addressing voters concerns, a good start would be to state, clearly, that the Conservatives are not only opposed to an amnesty for illegal immigrants, but also that they will kick them out of the country.

Don’t hold your breath, after all one of the most ardent supporter of that amnesty is Boris Johnson and no one from the Conservative party told him to shut up.

Soon voters will realize that Tories are now a carbon copy of the Labour party and more of them will support us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Chris Roberts at a 2009 meeting of the BNP Bromley and Lewisham branch.

Chris Roberts a native of Downham gives us the history of his home patch, and the enrichment his old stamping ground has benefitted from. Downham was once a stronghold of nationalism in the 70s but now is nothing more than a sink estate for welfare scroungers and the exported detritus of Lewisham.

Chris Roberts 02/04/09 from Steven Richards on Vimeo.

I know Downham well, I remember the Tavern with what seemed to be the longest bar in the world, ( I was quite young at the time and memory may be failing me) and the many happy evenings spent in conversation with fellow patriots intent on preserving our way of life. So this video brought to mind happy and simpler times, but it also sent my blood pressure through the roof.

What have we lost in the intervening years?

We have lost all that was good about our country before the derided concept of PC and multi cultural diversity became the norm. The fallow field of late 70s Downham became the rich soil in which the seeds of decay were sown by those intent on the destruction of the white working class by dint of importing non ethnics. If you wish to visit Downham now I would advise that you drive through it, and do not even think of pausing for a pint in the Tavern unless you wish to risk life and limb.
The conquest of Downham is just the tip of the iceberg, the biggest part of the plan is well and truly hidden. But it is coming to your area very soon.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Chairman of the BNP asks a sensible question to The Commission.

“How will Europol access personal information on persons?”

How do you feel knowing that the safety and security of you and your fellows is in the hands of the people who forced us to accept the dead hand of the despotic EU?

The Data Protection Officer and the JSB a body of independent national supervisory bodies?
How can they be independent FFS the EU pays their wages… There is nothing independent about them.

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2598/10
by Nick Griffin (NI)
to the Commission

Subject: Europol

How will Europol access personal information on persons?
E-2598/10EN
Answer given by Ms Malmström
on behalf of the Commission
(19.5.2010)

The Council Decision of 6 April 2009 establishing Europol1 clearly restricts the processing of information and intelligence, including personal data, to the sole purpose of the achievement of Europol’s objectives. The Decision also foresees time limits for the storage of data and the obligation to delete data when no longer relevant.

Accordingly, access by Europol to personal data is subject to rigorous conditions. Only duly authorized members of staff can access Europol’s data bases on a needs’ basis, i.e. to help respond to a Member State’s query or to assist national law enforcement services in a cross-border investigation.

The rules on the processing of information enshrined in the Council Decision include, inter alia, the control, through a logging mechanism, of the legality of all retrievals by Europol staff members.

Compliance with this regime, which also protects individual rights, is monitored by the Data Protection Officer, Europol’s internal supervisor, and by the Joint Supervisory Body (JSB), consisting of representatives of the independent national supervisory bodies.

http://www.simondarby.blogspot.com/

Share this post:

Hide Sites