The same weekend that nationalists attended the indigenous family weekend more than a million people attended a “largely peaceful” Notting Hill Carnival at the weekend, marred only by a handful of thugs throwing stones at police.

Scotland Yard said overall crime was down by almost a third with 235 arrests over the two days, most of them for drugs offences.

More than 5,000 officers were on duty in a £6 million policing operation which saw few outbreaks of trouble in its 47th year and a weekend of mostly good weather.

Mayor Boris Johnson was among more than 600,000 revellers who turned out for the climax of Europe’s largest street festival — bathed in glorious bank holiday Monday sunshine after heavy showers had drenched the crowds of about 400,000 who lined the three-and-a-half mile route to watch the Children’s Day parade on Sunday.

Thousands of colourfully dressed dancers followed the floats. Organisers estimate revellers consumed five tons of chicken and 25,000 bottles of rum while some 16,000 records were played at 41 sound systems.

“Champagne” Lewis, 40, who runs an after-school club, came down from Manchester with two friends.
She said: “We come every year and it just gets better and better. It’s so exciting, I feel like a child on Christmas Eve. I love it.”

Eva Jackson, 25, and her friend Mariska Cornelis, 26, flew from Rotterdam. Ms Jackson said: “It’s so much fun, we come every year. Our whole plane was full of people coming to the carnival. The Netherlands is very multi-cultural and there’s a carnival in Rotterdam but it’s nothing like this.”

Police used mobile metal detectors and number-plate recognition cameras to put a security ring around the event. More than 20 people had weapons seized and a gun was found in a car.

Chief Inspector Jo Edwards said the “largely peaceful and fun-filled” event was marred by a small element who threw stones and bottles at police as night fell yesterday.

She said: “Most carnival-goers had a fantastic time. However, as we have seen in previous years, last night saw some people determined to try to ruin it for others who simply wanted to enjoy a day out.”

Scotland Yard said 235 people had been arrested, slightly up on last year’s 222.

In a separate operation British Transport Police arrested 53 people on the Underground and trains.

The vast majority of arrests were for drugs offences, although there were also four arrests for firearms offences, 20 for carrying knives and other weapons, three for robbery and two for GBH.

Two stabbing victims were among a total of 706 people dealt with by the London Ambulance Service.

On tuesday morning hundreds of cleaners moved in to sweep away tons of rubbish. Kensington and Chelsea’s refuse contractor Sita UK said it hoped to be the first waste-disposal company to send all the rubbish from a festival for recycling.

So the Metropolitan Police was delighted because an unspecified number of thugs (we would like to know now many) just threw stones and bottles at them and only two people were stabbed.

If these incidents are not serious I wonder what the enrichers need to do in order to convince the Police that this event should be banned for security reasons.

If there was a drop in the crime figures it was probably due to the bad weather on Sunday keeping a lot of people away.

Nationalists will have noticed that the GLA can find £6m to pay for the policing of this Afro-Caribbean event but it claims it has no funds for St George Day’ celebrations.

When the treacherous liberals claim that the carnival is an important multicultural event they do have a point, it demonstrates everything that is wrong with mass immigration and multiculturalism.

The history of this celebration can be traced back to the late ’50 when West Indians rioted in 1958 after some of them were the victims of racist attacks.

The first wave of West Indians settled in Notting Hill because it was the only place they could find any accommodation, and clearly the indigenous Britons living there didn’t want to see their area turning in a Caribbean ghetto and they becoming the minority.

There is some truth in that, but at that time the situation was created by the government when it allowed the first immigration wave from the Caribbean on the grounds that they were needed to fill job vacancies.

Of course there is no justification for any racist assault but if native Britons were angry it was because no one asked them if they wanted their area to be enriched in the first place.

Sound familiar?
Yes, because Notting Hill was the prelude to what was going to happen in other parts of Britain in the following decades.

The carnival may be an example of what is great about multicultural London but the muggings, stabbings and assaults on Police officers that take place during this event act as a reminder of the negative effects of third world immigration that have brought many kind of crimes (such as gang-related crimes) that were previously unheard off.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Last year Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, urged Londoners to fast for a day during Ramadam so that people would have a better understanding of Islam.

And he is far from alone, Caroline Spelman claimed that the burkha empowers women who wear it, and David Cameron said that native Britons should adapt to Muslim way of life and not the other way round.

The Islamification of Britain is an exemplar of the treachery committed by our political class in peacetime.

But how tolerant are Muslim countries?

There is an enlightening story reported by Ansamed, an Italian press agency.

Unsurprisingly it has been ignored by MSM, because it would breach the NUJ guidelines and be at odds with their marxist agenda.

The procession of the Virgin Mary of Trapani, held in the parish church of La Goulette (Tunis), could not be held as scheduled due to a lack of authorisation.

The procession, which has not been held since August 15 1960 was announced during the meeting of ”Tunisia, Land of Religious Encounters and Tourism”, organised over the last few days by the Association for the Protection and Renovation of La Goulette, in collaboration with the Catholic diocese of Tunis and the Grand Rabbinate of Tunisia.

The event had been eagerly awaited by the many believers who had gathered in the parish church where the archbishop of Tunisia, Maroun Laham, said mass.

The suspension caught everyone out according to Kapitalis, the parish priest said that the non-authorisation by Tunisian authorities was a consequence of the difficulty to ”get round” a 1964 law regulating worship by the Catholic Church in Tunisia.

In the words of Don Llambrich wrote Kapitalis, it is important for Christians and foreigners to fully comply with ”the rules established by the Tunisian Republic if we want to continue worshipping without restrictions.”

Do we in the UK have the right to make laws regulating worship by Muslims or any other religions?

Of course not because the ‘establishment’ would condemn it as abhorrent, and an example of religious and racial intolerance.

But the fact that a country like Tunisia has a law denied to us is not that surprising because we all know there is one law for them and another law for us.

Interestingly Tunisia is not a country one would associate with radical Islam, more of moderate Islam, but it demonstrates once again that Islam and democracy are incompatible.

I do not blame Tunisia for their stand, actually they should be praised for preserving their identity and I am more happy with that.

However, if Tunisia feels they have the right to deny authorization for a procession, we should have the right to decide what Muslim festivals should or should not be allowed, and force them to ask permission.

I believe it is time we learned from Tunisia and fought back, one way to do this is to present a motion at the next BNP conference calling for the introduction of a similar law to regulate worship by Muslims.

After all no one is accusing the Tunisians of xenophobia and religious intolerance are they?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Our team at City Hall continue to do London BNP proud. The questions posed to Mayor Boris Johnson have demonstrated that we have a broader grasp of the problems facing Londoners over and above the intolerable amount of immigration our city has had to put up with these last 30 years or so. The mainstream media today are full of reports about high electricity and gas prices. They point out that market forces are not causing high tariffs rather they have arisen due to Climate Change laws brought in by the previous government and now enthusiastically endorsed by the new Condem coalition! Whilst these policies place the emphasis for renewable energy on the energy suppliers, all they do is pass the cost onto the consumer, hence whilst wholesale gas and electricity prices are reasonably stable and have been for many months our bills continue to be sky high! This intolerable burden on the consumer at a time of serious economic hardship can be attributed to loony Climate Change policies of LIBLABCON.

Now remember the BNP question to the Mayor in March this year:
“”London taxpayers’ millions are being committed to your new “Climate Change” strategy. Energy providers are citing infrastructure projects to comply with government co2 reduction targets and renewable energy initiatives as the reason for keeping tariffs high despite much lower wholesale prices. Is it right that Londoners should be hammered twice for what is an unproven theory and doesn’t this actually compound fuel poverty?”

The Mayor scoffed at our question and claimed his policies are “reducing fuel poverty”, yeah ok Mayor if you say so!
We followed this up in May with the following question:

“The French have scrapped their “Green Tax” to ensure their companies can ride out the recession. Do you believe London should follow the French lead and lobby Government to suspend all environmental taxes until economic recovery is well established?”
Answer from the Mayor
No, I do not agree with this approach

So there you have it, Mayor Boris is happy for the economic recovery to be jeopardised by continuing with policies on what is as yet an unproven theory, pretty scary stuff if you are trying to survive on a low income!
Team BNP at City Hall also flagged up the certain demise of Tube Lines long before it happened, so we trust all our members and supporters in London are supportive of our efforts to hold the Mayor to account on a broad range of issues demonstrating to Londoners that contrary to media myth London BNP are very capable of serving the capital!
Mayor’s Question Time for July is this Wednesday 10am City Hall in the main chamber, please come and support us, it means a lot when you do!

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Mayor of London seems to be completely disconnected from the reality we parents face on the streets of London. Cycling to school? No, thank you. I want my children to stay alive. If they are not killed by impatient drivers, they will be mugged or killed by the neighbouring gangs. My own children are not safe when they try to come back home from school and one of the schools is merely three streets away from home.

I used to allow my children to go to the local parks alone. Not anymore. Riding bicycles in certain areas of London they automatically become a target. In my corner of the woods, just hours ago, a child was stabbed to death. What the Mayor of London needs is a strong dose of reality. We live like hostages in our own homes and our children have a plastic existence because we and our children are no longer safe in London.

My own son was attacked  and beaten on his way home from school on June 8th 2010. It was before the previous attack when a gang mugged him and his mates using knives. Classmates of my children were recently attacked three times in less than two weeks. The Mayor is obviously oblivious to the war that is taking place right now in London. Riding to and from school? You must be joking!!!

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, last year urged Londoners to fast for a day during Ramadam so that they can have a better understanding of the ‘great religion’ that is Islam.

He is not alone in his admiration of the ‘religion’, after all his party mate now in Downing Street stated that native Britons should integrate into the Muslim way of life.

As for the useless Church of England, no comment required.

But do Muslim countries show any sign of tolerance toward Christians?

Of course not, and further confirmation comes from ‘Compass’ which reported that Moroccan authorities have expelled eight more foreign Christians from the country last weekend, bringing the total of deported Christians since March to 128.

Two foreign women married to Moroccan Christians were included in this third wave of deportations since March, raising concerns that local authorities intend to harass the country’s small but growing Protestant community.

“They are all in fear, because this happened to people who are married.”

One of the women, a Lebanese national married to a Moroccan, was diagnosed with cancer last month and is the mother of a 6-year old girl whom she was forced to leave behind.

A Spanish national, Sara Domene, 31, was also deported on Monday (June 28), according to news sources. Domene was working as a language teacher in the Western Sahara, a territory under Moroccan sovereignty.

Authorities called the foreigners to police stations across Morocco on Friday (June 25) and told them they had 48 hours to leave the country on grounds of “threatening public order.”

Other nationals who were forced to leave the country over the weekend came from France, Egypt, Lebanon, Switzerland, Nigeria and Spain.

A source explained that Moroccan authorities are essentially deporting Christians for “proselytism,” which is illegal in Morocco, but in order to justify the deportations they have claimed that the foreigners pose a threat to the state.

In April nearly 7,000 Muslim religious leaders backed the deportations by signing a document describing the work of Christians within Morocco as “moral rape” and “religious terrorism.” The statement from the religious leaders came amid a nationwide mudslinging campaign geared to vilify Christians in Morocco for “proselytism” – widely perceived as bribing people to change their faith.

There are an estimated 1,000 Moroccan Christian converts in the country. They are not recognized by the government. About 99 percent of Morocco’s population of more than 33 million is Muslim.

No one can blame Moroccan authorities for expelling Christians, after all they want to preserve their identity in the same way the British National Party want to stop the islamization of Britain.

Morocco has the right to remain Muslim and kick out anyone who wants to convert Moroccans to Christianity in the same way we have the right to expel anyone who wants to impose Islam on us.

The rising number of Muslims in the UK pose a threat to the state and we should not only follow Morocco’ example, but go further and put on trial for treason all the politicians that allowed them to come in the UK in the first place.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

This event, due to take place this month, has apparently been upgraded this year,”to enable the highest number of people to take part and put their questions to Mayor Boris Johnson and senior members of his administration.” For the first time, Londoners will be able to question the Mayor by using Twitter, and the GLA website.

I wish all Londoners who take the trouble to participate, the best of luck!

From my experiences in confronting Boris in the Assembly Chamber face to face, all I get in response to my carefully aimed questions are bluster, avoidance and dismissal. Nothing constructive in the practical sense that would address the concerns of ordinary people of London about immigration, overcrowding, rising crime rates and lack of jobs. And, come to think of it, nothing seems to have been done by the Tories about the programme of affordable (council) housing which was apparently going to be implemented in the Boroughs. But I expect when he’s in front of the cameras in this well publicised and stage managed event, Boris will probably make more of an effort to pander to the points made by members of the public than he does to me! After all, he’s got his beady eye fixed on the 2012 mayoral election already, as indeed has Ken Livingstone.

The purpose behind what are effectively carefully orchestrated public events like this, is simply to placate the voters by giving them the illusion that they can be personally involved in formulating policy, when nothing can be further from the truth. I can tell you from my first hand experiences in the Chamber that Boris and this cronies simply don’t want to know! They know what they think and they certainly don’t want to want to know what you or I think, save to pay lip-service to a choice few voters’ aspirations in order to get themselves voted in again.

Unfortunately, words come cheap, and under the current political system where so much of our daily activity is regulated by Europe, and politicians are never held personally accountable, talking-shops are seen as a useful tool for diffusing voters’ frustrations and getting the politicians themselves trowel-loads of publicity at the same time. Meanwhile, the wheels of a bloated, ineffective and wasteful bureaucracy grind inexorably on, ever more restricting our lives, and strangling personal initiative and freedom. The end result of all this is that nothing changes- to the delight of the top echelons of civil servants who continue to clandestinely run the show and get paid handsomely for doing so.

Enjoy the debate by all means, and do try to bate Boris and get him in a twist if you can! But don’t be surprised when all is said, there’ll be next to nothing done, if anything!

We need to roll back regulation and reduce unnecessary government. The BNP sees the importance of limiting legislation, cutting bureaucracy and restoring power to where it truly belongs- the people!

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We showed a video the from Richard Barnbrook and Chris Roberts a few days ago explaining how Boris Johnson had betrayed Black cab drivers.

This should surprise nobody, after all the Mayor of London is campaigning for an amnesty for the one million or so illegal immigrants living in London and therefore he doesn’t care about native Britons.

And he is not alone.

Canterbury, Kent, is at the centre of a foreign jobs row after a local taxi boss admitted hiring 54 drivers from 42 different countries.

According to an article published by the Daily Express only six of the 60-strong workforce at Cab Co are from the UK.

The rest come from nations as diverse as Afghanistan, Albania, ­Brazil, Bulgaria, Cyprus, China, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia and Spain.

The firm’s boss, Robert Jones, said his foreign drivers are better workers than the English.

“That’s the big difference,” said Mr Jones, “The Englishman comes to work, gets to a certain level and goes home.

“He doesn’t want to work any more than that. They’re more than happy to be getting home.

“But the foreign boys will carry on.

“If there’s a job, they’ll do it.”

He said he employs drivers from “all over the place”, not just EU countries, and that his local council vets all their visas before licences are issued.

British drivers say they have ­suffered a devastating fall in fares after the influx of migrant cabbies.

Independent driver Chris Olding claims the foreign “invasion” had cost locals £300 a week in fares.

“It’s not the recession, it’s the new drivers,” he said.

“There are more and more coming from Eastern Europe.”

Immigration watchdogs branded the trend typical of how working ­conditions were becoming intolerable for British workers.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of MigrationWatch UK, said: “This is a clear example of how working ­conditions for many British workers are deteriorating. They are facing competition from immigrant workers who can afford to work for less or longer hours.

“It is no wonder employers and organisations are so keen on ­immigration – it’s good for profits but not for British workers.”

Dave Spearman, a driver in Canterbury for 15 years, added: “It’s like the United Nations these days – you’ve got boys from Poland, Turkey, Lithuania, you name it.

“I’m not having a go at them ­personally. All the fellas get on really well. It’s just hard to earn a decent wage with so many coming in.”

Colin Mitchell, a driver in the city for 20 years, said: “I also blame the council for approving their licences.”

He claimed that he made £900 a week two years ago but that his takings have now gone down to £600 or £700 a week at best since the arrival of migrant drivers began to impact on his trade.

By contrast, the foreign drivers are said to be raking in up to £1,000 a week. But to do so they regularly work for longer than 70 hours a week.

Turkish driver Mustafa Ustabas said: “It’s an open market.

“If you are willing to work and can work legally, then nobody has the right to stop you.

“Robert Jones is only looking out for himself.

“I can understand from his point of view. He makes more money.”

Canterbury city council spokesman said: “All licensed taxi drivers have either a British passport or a permit to live and work here.

“If someone is legally entitled to a licence then they can have one and there is no cap on the number of licences issued.”

Once again the interest of British workers have been sacrificed to appease the greed of ruthless employers.

Nationalists can see again yet again the usual argument that foreigners are more hard working than Britons is used to justify mass immigration.

There are two aspects to this story.

The first is about morality.

Whereas no one condone idleness and laziness, the fact is that people are not machines and it’s reasonable for workers to expect to work only a certain amount of hours so they can have time to enjoy themselves with their families.

Treating workers with contempt because they refuse to work long hours is clearly unacceptable, especially when the reason for long hours is to make rich employers richer and fatter.

But there is also a health and safety issue here.

Apparently there are drivers who work more than 70 hours a week.

How safe is a passenger if the driver who picks him/her up works more than 12 hours a day?

Surely those drivers that work 12 hour shifts lose concentration and are more likely to be involved in car accidents because they are tired.

This is another example of the negative effects of mass immigration and the misery it’s causing to British workers.

The only positive aspect is that those betrayed cabbies may become BNP supporters and it may help us to get the first BNP councillor elected to Canterbury City Council next year.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The three main political parties keep ignoring voters concerns about immigration, The Daily Star has an article detailing how much of the British taxpayers money is spent on people who are not supposed to be here in the first place.

According to the Daily Star, violent illegal immigrants cost us £8million a year because we can’t get rid of them.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/132923/We-pay-8m-bill-as-migrants-fight-back/

Border Agency staff abandon attempts to deport foreigners if they become aggressive. And in 18 months, 1,118 people became so violent it was deemed unsafe to escort them out the UK.
The National Audit Office figures show immigrants get violent at their holding centre, or are hauled off planes because the pilot becomes concerned for other passengers.
The largest numbers of offenders come from Nigeria, Turkey, China, Cameroon and Pakistan.
Each deportation costs £11,000, whether it is successful or not.
Matthew Elliott of the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: “It’s disgraceful these fudged deportations cost so much. If someone is violent it’s all the more reason to deport them quickly.”
Meanwhile, the Lib Dems’ proposed amnesty on illegals would cost Britain £100billion in a generation, with think-tank MigrationWatch warning 1.1million could cash in.
Chairman Sir Andrew Green said: “It is crazy to suggest these sums should be spent rewarding people who have been breaking our laws.”

We must not forget that one of the strongest supporters of an amnesty for illegals is the Mayor of London Boris Johnson, thus proving that the Tories are as bad as Labour and the Lib-Dems.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Nationalists have always known that David Cameron is a liar and a traitor.

Further confirmation came last night when he claimed immigration would soar if Britain backed Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg.

He warned voters away from the Lib Dems, claiming their amnesty for illegals would be disastrous.

Mr Clegg wants to give an estimated one million illegal immigrants in Britain permission to stay, and his party believes border controls should be relaxed.

The LibDems are enjoying a huge surge in their popularity after their leader’s convincing win in last week’s TV debate.

But Mr Cameron said voters would soon drop their support when the party’s policies were fully exposed. Panicking Tory chiefs are desperate to stop the Clegg “bounce” from harming their chances on May 6th. Advisers have told the Conservative leader to act tougher in the second TV debate on Thursday. The Tories have made a last-minute change of tactics to their party election broadcast aired last night to switch the attack from Labour to the Lib Dems.

Mr Cameron said: “It is the Conservatives who offer decisive change, anything else and you risk being stuck with what you have got.” It’s a bit rich for Mr Cameron to criticize Mr Clegg for proposing an amnesty for illegal immigrants when it was a Tory bigwig, Boris Johnson, who started campaigning for the same thing a few months ago.

Why doesn’t Mr Cameron attack Bojo with the same zeal?

Thus far we have not heard him, or anyone else from the Tory party, make any sort of  statement on the issue, so we must conclude that all Conservatives want an amnesty.

It is also amazing that Mr Cameron has managed to deceive voters about his plan to put a cap on the number of immigrants coming into the UK.

We have said many times that immigration and asylum policies are decided by the EU, so there is nothing the Conservative party can do to implement his plan.

Making this promise is deliberately lying to people and they are proving once again, that they are no better that the Labour party.

For all his faults, at least Mr Clegg is honest about his intentions and this may explain why he is riding high in the polls and the Tories are failing to capitalise on 13 years of Labour failures.

Only the British National Party is determined to stop this madness, and that is why the establishment is scared of us and will use any tool in their armoury to stop us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Gordon Brown  must think that voters are useless idiots.

In a speech delivered in East London the PM promised a controlled and fairer immigration system and acknowledged that voters are right to be concerned, and I think he really expects us to believe him.

This is the same Gordon Brown who in 2000, according to recently disclosed documents, together with other Labour party’ ministers planned to swamp Britain with a mass immigration in order to change our social structure, and bring them a huge pool of potential Labour voters.

To add insult to the injury, his party has passed dozens of anti-racism laws that make any criticism of immigration or multiracialism a criminal offence.

He has ignored the concerns of the people for 13 years, and denied the public a debate on this topic, he is trying to give the impression that NuLabour has learned from its mistakes and he and his Fabian fellow travellers are starting to listen to people.

We all know that the PM is committed to controlling immigration; in the same way that Pete Doherty is serious about kicking his drug addiction, Boy George giving up gay sex, and the UAF ending its politically motivated violence programme.

This is why many political commentators are urging David (mini me Tony) Cameron to make clear his plan to reduce immigration in order to prevent the British National Party capitalising on the issue.

Unfortunately for them the Conservatives do not have a credible plan, and it is not just because they fear accusations of racism.

Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, strongly supports an amnesty for the one million or so illegal immigrants living in the UK.

So far no one in the Tory party has distanced themselves from him and this shows that David Cameron and the Tories support BoJo and his amnesty scheme.

So far the only thing we know about the Conservatives is that they want a cap in the number of immigrants allowed in the UK.

It sounds good except that under the Lisbon Treaty it is the EU that has the last word on immigration and asylum and therefore nothing can be done without the approval of the EU bureaucrats.

That is why anyone expecting the Tories to offer a sensible alternative will be disappointed.

Are we nationalists surprised?

Of course not.

Let’s not forget Gordon Brown reneged on his promise to give UK voters a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty and the same can be said for the “Cast Iron Guarantee” of the Conservatives.

Unfortunately for them they think the voters are idiots, fortunately for us the voters are only asleep; and this is why support for the British National Party is increasing despite the machinations of the establishment to prevent our growth.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Boris Johnson never ceases to amaze me!!

Just when nationalists thought the Tory party was adopting a tough line on immigration, in their effort to steal votes from the British National Party, Mr Johnson does a hatchet job on his party, this will remind voters that the Tory party is a carbon copy of Labour, and like the latter, it is committed to unlimited mass immigration in order to destroy our Kingdoms and make Britain a ‘multiracial’ country.

Bo Jo has launched a scheme to give all refugees English lessons to help them find jobs (what jobs?).

Mr Johnson is committed to giving an amnesty to illegal immigrants, and asks native Britons to fast for one day during Ramadam (but, of course, never asked Muslims to spend a day in a Christian church to better understand of our culture).

The strategy, called London Enriched, is designed to help those seeking asylum to integrate and find employment. A special migration board, headed by deputy mayor Richard Barnes, will lobby for better provision of ESOL, English lessons for speakers of other languages, across London.

Mr Johnson said: “It is imperative that refugees learn English as soon as possible to ease their integration into London life. Without it, they face immense barriers to gaining employment and further education, the necessary tools that will enable them to fully function and contribute (sic) to society.

“London is a great, teeming cosmopolis of talent and my ancestors benefited from being able to come to this great city and I’m very proud of that. We don’t want to become a society that is hostile to the talent and energy people can offer.

“Refugees bring skills, experience, knowledge and often an entrepreneurial spirit that can make a vital contribution to London’s economy.

“But it must be a two-way street, built on positive engagement by both refugees and settled communities for the benefit of all Londoners.”

Called the London Strategic Migration Partnership, the board plans to ensure all refugees have access to appropriate tuition, improving their ability to find jobs by promoting training and skills.(Another bloody ‘Quango‘)

It also will ensure that the police and justice system deliver high-quality services, and that refugee children are given the same (preferential) opportunities as their peers.

The board will work closely with the London Skills Council, which provides funding for ESOL through the Government’s adult learning budget.

It will make sure funds are directed to those parts of London with high demand (and NuLab voters), such as Tower Hamlets where budget cuts have caused concern over services available.

Donna Covey, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: “We’re very pleased the Mayor recognises the huge contribution refugees make to London, and how important it is that there is a strategy to ensure they are able to continue to do so. The process of integration starts from the moment a refugee arrives here. We look forward to working with him to ensure that there are enough opportunities for refugees to learn English, look for work, and rebuild their lives as part of thriving, successful communities.”

We would like to know how much this scheme is going go cost and why there are no plans to help the huge number of long-term British-born unemployed living in London.

The only bright side is that Mr Johnson is doing a damn good job convincing the indigenous that voting Tory is useless and the white working class abandoned by Labour will see the BNP as the only party who cares for them.

If this is what our government and the other parties plan to do in their deluded efforts to reconnect with voters, our chances of getting control of Barking & Dagenham can only get better.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Members and supporters of the British National Party are encouraged to attend the next Mayor’s Question Time at the GLA on December 16th.

Richard Barnbrook will be following up on the response he received to a previous question about the violent disorder of the establishment’s pet thugs, the UAF, at BBC Television Centre prior to Nick Griffin’s appearance on question time.

Question by Richard Barnbrook

Will the Mayor condemn the disgraceful violence and disorder perpetrated by the Unite Against Fascism organisation outside the BBC’s Broadcasting House following Mr Nick Griffin’s lawful invitation onto that evening’s Question Time programme? This behaviour resulted in three police officers being injured. Many politicians and public figures are signatories to this UAF organisation. And will the Mayor ask the Commissioner of the MPS to ban such an assembly should the BBC invite Mr Griffin onto the show at some future date?

Answer by Boris Johnson

The disorder was actually outside Television Centre, not Broadcasting House. I believe that it was counter-productive in the fight against the offensive views of Nick Griffin and the BNP. It diverted the media’s interest away from scrutinising the unpleasantness of Mr. Griffin’s party and only succeeded in giving him even more publicity. I have no intention of banning legal protests against the BNP. I believe in the freedom of speech.

Apparently Mayor Boris supports freedom of speech, so long as it is leftist thugs exerting their freedom. Can you imagine Boris saying the same if and angry crowd of BNP supporters had stormed the BBC in protest against any of his establishment chums?

Come along and show Richard your support at the next Mayor’s Question. Please be at the GLA building (City Hall), adjacent to the south side of Tower Bridge by 9.30am. Mayoral questions start at 10am.

You can see a complete list of Assembly Member Barnbrook’s questions to the Mayor, with answers received, by clicking HERE.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The London Mayor Boris Johnson, promised to scrap the congestion charge in some areas of West London, he then reneged on the promise, using the excuse that scrapping it would leave a damn great hole in the City’ budget.

Now we have a u-turn on congestion charge.

Motorists face being charged to drive on London’s busiest roads under radical new plans from Boris Johnson.

Drivers may be forced to pay for every mile they drive — on top of the congestion charge — as the Mayor fights to plug a multi-million-pound hole in the Transport for London budget.

If previous government proposals are followed the cost could be up to £1.34 a mile. Someone with a 12-mile round trip to work in central London during the day could pay a total of £20.

Cars would be tracked by satellite and charged for entering the most congested areas. The plan would raise significant revenue for the Mayor and if it works, would open up busy areas to cyclists and improve bus journey times. It would also reduce pollution from cars. As usual the MSM giving a distorted view of this new plan.

What Mr Johnson neglects to say, is the European Union plan to impose congestion charge and road driving charge anyway!

This became evident last August when the think-tank Open Europe revealed that the Brussels bureaucrats are drawing up plans that will result in the introduction of road tolls across Europe – including the United Kingdom – despite overwhelming opposition from motorists.

We have already reported on a story about the plan to introduce road and congestion charge in Newcastle:

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/08/22/how-motorists-are-paying-a-high-price-for-uk-membership-of-the-eu/

http://www.journallive.co.uk/north-east-news/todays-news/2009/08/21/motorists-may-be-forced-to-pay-eu-congestion-tax-61634-24495634/

So Boris Johnson is only obeying orders from the unelected bureaucrats of the EU.

Of course congestion is a huge problem in London, but as everyone knows the main reason for it, is overcrowding caused by mass immigration.

There are an estimated half million illegal immigrants in London, and getting rid of them would help, but as we know Mr Johnson is pushing for an amnesty!

Drivers should remember this when struck in a traffic jam, and then are forced to pay £20 for the privilege of the twelve mile trip. How about losing 500,000 from the population of our great city?

That way we lose hundreds of illegal mini cab drivers, and more business for black cabs as a bonus.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Today newspapers reported.

A woman, seven months pregnant was “orally raped” at gunpoint by three robbers who burst into her London home.

The 33-year-old was watching TV with her boyfriend when the men struck at 10.30pm.

Her boyfriend, 39, was clubbed about the head and threatened with a sawn-off shotgun as the gang demanded the keys to their Audi TT car.

One of the men grabbed the woman and took her upstairs where she was forced to commit a sex act which police described as “oral rape”.

The assailant threatened to shoot her and her boyfriend if she did not do as she was told. The men then stole a mobile phone, iPod, cash, debit cards and laptop and escaped in the Audi parked outside the couple’s home in Finsbury Park.

Unfortunately violent crimes like this are now commonplace.

What is enlightening is the description of the suspects.
The man who carried out the “oral rape” is described as black, 6ft tall, aged 18 to 25 and stocky. He wore a black balaclava, black jacket and black tracksuit bottoms.

A second man was black or Asian, 5ft 6ins and about 18. He wore light grey tracksuit bottoms, black trainers and a zip-up jacket with red sleeves.

The third suspect, who wielded the gun, was black, 5ft 10ins, and aged between 18 and 22. He was wearing burgundy tracksuit bottoms.

Two men were caught on CCTV outside a mini-market at the corner of Seven Sisters Road and Durham Road in Holloway 10 minutes before the attack.

Now it will be interesting to find out if those three assailants were born in this country, are here illegally, or asylum seekers?

One of the uncomfortable truths is, that the greater proportion of violent crimes in London are carried out by immigrants, yet no one dare talk about it. The illiberal elite in charge of this country try to silence us by branding anyone who speaks the truth as racist.

The fact remains that this awful, and demeaning act may have been carried out by people who are not supposed to be here in the first place, a fact worth remembering, as government is forcing us to accept an ever increasing number of immigrants and threats of prosecution for anyone who complain about it.

The British National Party is not afraid to tell the truth about immigration, so it is incumbent on us to describe this as one of the negative effects brought upon this country by the disastrous policies implemented by Labour and Conservative governments in the last 50 odd years.

This is why it’s time for Nationalists to act, and direct their anger toward the mayor of London Boris Johnson, Barking MP Margaret Hodge, and Dagenham MP Jon Cruddas.

This wicked trio are but the latest generation of those responsible for these, and other crimes, (violent or otherwise) committed by immigrants and they must bear the consequences of their decisions.

They want to give an amnesty to the 1 million or so illegal immigrants living in London, increase the number of foreigners allowed to live and work in the UK, and won’t miss an opportunity to threaten anyone who disagrees with their plan.

Not all the immigrants are criminal but almost all our elected politicians in Westminster are.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Boris Johnson today called for every home in London to have a water meter, a move which could add £20 to some bills. The Mayor announced his support for the move to conserve water as demand rises due to an expanding population and higher temperatures caused by climate change.

Whereas reducing water consumption is a worthy goal, the fact is that Boris Johnson and the previous Labour and Conservative governments created this problem in the first place. The privatization of water utilities, even if done with the best intentions, brought a huge increase in water bills without any improvement in the service provided.

So the risk is that the installation of water meters will do little to cut water use and instead will result in higher bills for already overstretched consumers. However Mr Johnson deliberately refuses to say why there is an increase in demand. Maybe because he should admit that the expanding population he mentioned is the result of the massive, unprecedented mass immigration that Labour and Conservative governments allowed against the wish of British voters.

Doesn’t take a genius to understand that this huge inflow has a negative impact on the environment and yet, this basic truth is overlooked by politicians as well as green groups. In addition to this, Mr Johnson strongly supports an amnesty for illegal immigrants - people that are not supposed to be in this country in the first place. No one knows the exact number, some think there are 500,000 in London alone. Maybe the real figure is bigger but surely, if those 500,000 would be expelled it may be possible to reduce water consumption by at least 10% without any additional charge.

An obvious conclusion, except for the political elite who keep deceiving people on that subject.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Well, here’s what Boris said on 11 Jun 2007 in the House Of Commons:

“Mr. Boris Johnson: Does the hon. Gentleman agree that an inquiry could urgently consider our catastrophic failure before and after the war to protect Iraqi cultural heritage from systematic looting, which is devastating Iraq? If the Iraqis are to have any hope of rebuilding their country, that looting must be stopped. What have we in mind to prevent that? The Department for Culture, Media and Sport pledged £5 million, which has vanished, to stop the systematic looting. Would it not help the Iraqis to rebuild their future if they had some idea of what had allowed things to go so catastrophically wrong from the beginning?”

It’s one of those things you just don’t even need to explain, comment on or whatever, it speaks for itself.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

What if I asked what working class white Londoners are supposed to do, if they don’t like mass immigration into London? Would it be racist for a zealous black New Labour fan, to tell me that I should leave London if I don’t like diversity for the sake of diversity?

In a strange way, perhaps Mr McGrath should have resigned after all, because there is no way we in the BNP would have entertained such an absurd line of questioning. As a matter of fact, we would have turned the tables completly.

Is it not racist to assume that older Caribbean migrants would return to their home countries over a Tory mayor who has no race policies?

Is Marc Wadsworth (the ‘hack’ who questioned James) of the view that if we had a central government with no policies on race, that migrants would go home in their droves? It appears to be if one reads his article over at:

http://www.the-latest.com/blacks-should-go-back-home-if-they-dont-like-mayor

This particular paragraph is quite telling and dissapointing :

“Him, a guy from a country where Black people are the ‘Aboriginal’ indigenous nation who are stereotyped by the white colonisers as social security scrounging drunks, and me a confident, British-born Black activist and news media operator with a reasonable track record. I told him a little bit about my news media and campaigning background, including as a reporter/presenter at Thames Television and as the sort of ‘spin doctor’ and political facilitator for the Stephen Lawrence cause célèbre.”

I really don’t believe what I’m a reading. Only in Britain can someone make a remark that borders on racist about a white person AND get that white person out of a job!

If anything, the-latest.com should never have published such an article, if it contained a slur against white Australians.

Also, if Marc Wadsworth really gave a stuff about community relations between whites & blacks then he would have ensured that his articles had all instances of both the words “black” and “white” either capitalised or in lower case and not just having “Black” capitalised and “white” in lower case.

It’s not something he did by mistake, he’s done it in two articles now:

http://www.the-latest.com/the-latest-forces-sacking-of-race-gaffe-mayors-aide

http://www.the-latest.com/blacks-should-go-back-home-if-they-dont-like-mayor

Over and over as you read Marc’s main article, you’ll ask yourself the same question. Why is it not racist to pursue and have policies for the benefit of blacks but it suddenly is if we are talking about whites?

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Source : Your Local Guardian

“The Forensic Audit Panel, created by London Mayor Boris Johnson after he was elected last month, has unearthed a culture in which spending was encouraged and political interference common, but where there were few checks on whether taxpayers got value for money, its head Patience Wheatcroft said.

Seven police investigations have already been launched – although two have since been dropped – and more referrals to Scotland Yard have not been ruled out, Mrs Wheatcroft said.

They all related to the LDA except the seventh, revealed on Saturday, which involves the GLA and its role in Caribbean Showcase – an event partly organised by former mayor Ken Livingstone’s controversial senior aide Lee Jasper.”

While the Tories aren’t exactly whiter than white when it comes to corruption, at least Ken’s unaccountable extravagance has come to end. For Ken and his cronies the day that their chickens will come home to roost is becoming ever more apparent. Hopefully it will be Richard Barnbrook ordering the auditors to investigate Boris in a few years time!

Expect to see more news and reports both from both the press and ourselves at the BNP, on these setups : Green Badge Taxi School, Ethnic Mutual, Diversity International Ltd & Brixton Base.

Share this post:

Hide Sites