Elements in the media are attempting to set up a ‘debate’ between members of ethnic minorities who may potentially wish to join the BNP and members of the Party who are opposed to the new Constitutional change voted on at the EGM.

Please inform all members in your area that no member is permitted to engage in such a debate. The British National Party conducted its own debate in private on Sunday. Anyone who wished to participate in this debate had every opportunity to do so at the appropriate time and in the appropriate location. We do not wish to be involved in a media led circus over the matter.

Accordingly, it will be regarded as a very serious disciplinary matter for any member to ignore this instruction and to engage in unauthorised debates and discussions with the media over this issue.

Eddy Butler
National Organiser

Share

The abiding dream of all nationalist’ is to close our borders, kick out illegal immigrants, stop giving benefits and council houses to asylum seekers and give incentives to legal immigrants to go back to their home countries.

Will anyone from the mainstream media support those policies? No of course not!

We know the answer to immigration, and apparently it is dawning on some liberal journalists in the USA  at last!

This is why I decided to present for nationalists’ delectation and delight a commentary published in ‘The Bulletin’, a Philadelphia based newspaper.

The author of this piece Jim Wiles, is robust in his hatred of the British National Party, but in his article he shows his thinking is in line with the policies of his target of scorn; it contains a lot of common sense, such common sense as would be unthinkable in the UK MSM.

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/12/12/commentary/op-eds/doc4b23fa9caa66e460370513.txt

Have you noticed the Mexicans are going home? Some are trying to tough it out – and apparently even asking for help from home, but the trend line in illegal immigration to the United States is definitely down.

It’s particularly noticeable here on the Redneck Riviera. In 2005 – 2006, the Grand Strand was one of the four fastest-growing areas in the country.

Illegal immigrants swarmed on construction sites and in all sorts of outdoor work. Food carts and local Mexican restaurants offered regional specialties. Lowes and McDonald’s had bilingual signs. The old day laborer market for local African Americans had disappeared, replaced by Hispanics.

One night, pulling out of the Food Lion two blocks from my parents’ house, I saw a scary sight: a Mexican mom, baby in one hand, handlebar in the other, pushing out into rush hour traffic to take the groceries — safely strapped into the baby seat — home. I followed her, running interference with my car, until she’d turned safely into her driveway.

She didn’t have a hand free to wave. But her smile lit up the night.

That was then. With the bursting of the boom, she’s gone. So’s the day laborer market. Gone, too, this summer, were the armies of Eastern European students who had worked here the previous two years in the hospitality and retail industries.

The current economic debacle, thus, contains within it at least one pearl: a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rectify our illegal immigration problem in a humane way.

In this 24-hour news cycle, we seem able only to focus on one story at a time. Yet, the illegal immigration story has not gone away. It’s still right there, festering.

This is important because illegal immigration is one of those “intractable” problems, which is destroying the legitimacy of America’s government. It’s not intractable. Our rulers, whatever their party, simply don’t want to stop illegal immigration.

A majority of the American people disagree – strongly. Today, with 10 percent unemployment, that disagreement is stronger than ever.

This gap between voters and their elected representatives exists in far worse form in Europe. One example is the European Union (E.U.) itself, opposed by most voters, but implemented anyway.

The most recent example is the Swiss referendum held two weeks ago. Fifty seven percent of Swiss voters supported a ban on construction of new minarets. The response of political leaders across Western Europe? To condemn this expression of the popular will and to fervently hope that the European Human Rights Court will strike it down.

In today’s Western Europe, nationalism has become the virtue, which dare not speak its name.

The Swiss vote came on the heels of the revelation that the wave of Muslim and other non-white immigration into the United Kingdom since the coming of Tony Blair and the Labor Party to power in 1997 was not, as most had thought, the result of government incompetence. It was a deliberate policy. The Laborites sought to change the U.K.’s racial and religious complexion to help achieve their goal of de-constructing British society.

Even with that bombshell, British Conservatives won’t touch immigration. So, is it any wonder, then, that some voters are turning to the neo-fascist British National Party, which promises to “guarantee that Britain remains British?” As I’ve noted here before, the re-emergence of such parties in Europe is the direct result of elected leaders repeatedly overriding the voters’ wishes.

Here, in the U.S., happily, we have the opposite of voter apathy: a full blown, populist rebellion. But, in all of the hullabaloo, the illegal immigration issue has, so far, gotten dropped by the wayside.

It’s clear that, like Britain’s Labor Party, the Obama Democrats view illegal immigration as in their political interest. Why else the repeated trumpeting this year that conservatives are going to end up on the ash heap of history because America’s demographic makeup is changing? And yet, like the Tories, the GOP is gun-shy about the illegal immigration issue.

In Italy, the government is offering money to illegal immigrants willing to be returned to their countries of origin.

Something like that might be a modest, first step towards tackling America’s illegal immigration problem. It would also immediately begin making private sector jobs available to unemployed Americans. According to recent press reports, it’s not just Hispanics anymore down at the day laborer line at Home Depot and Lowes.

They are people you and I know.

Jim Wiles is a Philadelphia lawyer. He can be reached at jwiles@thebulletin.us

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The MSM are preparing to launch a massive smear campaign against the British National Party.                                                 Nationalists will be delighted to know that every quality Sunday and Daily national newspaper (with the exception of the Daily Star and the Daily Star on Sunday) recorded a year-on-year drop in circulation in November – and The Guardian, The Observer, The Financial Times and The Times suffering sharp dips.

According to the latest figures from the Audit Bureau of Circulations, published today, the Financial Times had an average global circulation of 401,072 in November, a fall of 9.2 per cent on the same month last year.

The UK and Irish edition of the FT had an average circulation of 119,868 last month, down 16.34 per cent from the 143,269 it sold last November.

News International daily, The Times, had an average circulation of 563,262 last month – down 9.42 per cent on November last year.

Telegraph Media Group’s Daily Telegraph had an average circulation of 744,151 last month, a drop of 5.65 per cent year-on-year, while Independent News & Media’s Independent dropped to an average circulation of 186,557, a fall of 7.24 per cent year-on-year.

Guardian News & Media’s daily, The Guardian, recorded an average daily circulation of 305,240 in November, a drop of 14.83 per cent year-on-year.

The Guardian’s stablemate, The Observer, recorded a similarly large circulation fall. GN&M’s Sunday paper had a circulation of 372,669 last month, a year-on-year drop of 16.06 per cent in the month that executives at the publishing company announced a further 100 job losses and outlined plans for cuts at GN&M resulting in a slimmed-down version of the paper in the New Year.

A large part of the double-digit circulation fall of The Guardian and The Observer can be attributed to GN&M’s decision in August to cease distribution of bulks – copies readers can pick up free from hotels, airlines and gyms.

Month-on-month The Guardian’ circulation fell 2.13 per cent from the 311,878 it averaged in October. Month-on-month the circulation of The Observer rose 1.57 per cent.

Behind The Observer, the second biggest faller in the Sunday market was News & Media’s Independent on Sunday. It had an average weekly circulation of 156,517 in November, a drop of 5.75 per cent year-on-year.

The Sunday Telegraph averaged a weekly circulation of 577,201 in November, a drop of four per cent year-on-year, while News International’s Sunday Times sold an average of 1,171,457 each week last month, a year-on-year drop of 4.26 per cent.

Alarm bells must be ringing at Trinity Mirror Group following the release of the ABC figures for November.

The Daily Mirror dropped 10 per cent year on year to 1,260,019 as it felt the effects of being 25p more expensive than the 20p Daily Star, and Sun which is also on sale for 20p in much of the country.

The Star rose 15.3 per cent year on year to 823,476 and The Sun dropped 2.87 per cent to 2.958,502.

TMG’s nationals division made an operating profit of £38.2m in 2008/2009 – so Trinity Mirror may now be looking at siphoning some of that cash into the Daily Mirror’s marketing budget to stem the sales losses at a paper.

Daily Mail and General Trust said in a rider to the annual results last month that the Mail titles were ditching CD and DVD give-aways in favour of “a sustained direct marketing campaign to recruit more long term loyal purchasers”.

If November’s figures are anything to do by, it seemed to be doing the trick.

The Daily Mail was the top performing mid-market title, other than the Daily Star,dropping just 0.7 per cent year on year to 2,163,701.The Mail on Sunday also performed well in its market, dropping 4.16 per cent to 2,071,526.

Like The Sun, the News of the World also dropped below three million in November, falling 7.3 per cent to 2,932,366.

National newspaper circulations for November 2009 (source ABC)

Popular/mid-market dailies:

Daily Mirror: 1,260,019, -10.01

Daily Record:323,051, -10.72

Daily Star: 823,476, 15.30

The Daily Telegraph: 744,151,-5.65

Financial Times: 401,072, -9.20

The Herald: 56,746, -9.57

The Guardian: 305,240, -14.83

The Independent: 186,557, -7.24

The Scotsman: 46,300, -7.78

The Times: 563,262, -9.42

The Sun: 2,958,502, -2.87

Racing Post: 57,456, -6.85

Daily Express: 685,195, -8.91

Daily Mail: 2,148,571, -0.70

Popular/mid-market Sundays

Independent on Sunday: 156,517, -5.75

The Observer: 372,669, -16.06

Scotland on Sunday: 58,595, -6.10

Sunday Herald: 43,173, -0.79

The Sunday Telegraph: 577,201, -4.00

The Sunday Times: 1,171,457, -4.26

Daily Star Sunday: 354,386, 2.15

News of the World: 2,923,355, -7.30

Sunday Mail: 392,174, -13.24

Sunday Mirror: 1,148,244, -8.52

The People: 533,782, -10.41

Sunday Express: 594,517, -11.33

Sunday Post: 340,285, -10.13

The Mail on Sunday: 2,071,526, -4.16

Clearly the MSM are paying the price for their anti-British hatred and biased editorial content.

Thanks to the internet, more and more people are refusing to accept the distorted version of the facts offered to them by newspapers and look elsewhere for information, including, but not exclusively the BNP’ website, other nationalist sites are out there. have a look at the right hand side of our front page.

Let’s hope that those rags go bankrupt one by one, and sooner rather than later.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Boris Johnson never ceases to amaze me!!

Just when nationalists thought the Tory party was adopting a tough line on immigration, in their effort to steal votes from the British National Party, Mr Johnson does a hatchet job on his party, this will remind voters that the Tory party is a carbon copy of Labour, and like the latter, it is committed to unlimited mass immigration in order to destroy our Kingdoms and make Britain a ‘multiracial’ country.

Bo Jo has launched a scheme to give all refugees English lessons to help them find jobs (what jobs?).

Mr Johnson is committed to giving an amnesty to illegal immigrants, and asks native Britons to fast for one day during Ramadam (but, of course, never asked Muslims to spend a day in a Christian church to better understand of our culture).

The strategy, called London Enriched, is designed to help those seeking asylum to integrate and find employment. A special migration board, headed by deputy mayor Richard Barnes, will lobby for better provision of ESOL, English lessons for speakers of other languages, across London.

Mr Johnson said: “It is imperative that refugees learn English as soon as possible to ease their integration into London life. Without it, they face immense barriers to gaining employment and further education, the necessary tools that will enable them to fully function and contribute (sic) to society.

“London is a great, teeming cosmopolis of talent and my ancestors benefited from being able to come to this great city and I’m very proud of that. We don’t want to become a society that is hostile to the talent and energy people can offer.

“Refugees bring skills, experience, knowledge and often an entrepreneurial spirit that can make a vital contribution to London’s economy.

“But it must be a two-way street, built on positive engagement by both refugees and settled communities for the benefit of all Londoners.”

Called the London Strategic Migration Partnership, the board plans to ensure all refugees have access to appropriate tuition, improving their ability to find jobs by promoting training and skills.(Another bloody ‘Quango‘)

It also will ensure that the police and justice system deliver high-quality services, and that refugee children are given the same (preferential) opportunities as their peers.

The board will work closely with the London Skills Council, which provides funding for ESOL through the Government’s adult learning budget.

It will make sure funds are directed to those parts of London with high demand (and NuLab voters), such as Tower Hamlets where budget cuts have caused concern over services available.

Donna Covey, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: “We’re very pleased the Mayor recognises the huge contribution refugees make to London, and how important it is that there is a strategy to ensure they are able to continue to do so. The process of integration starts from the moment a refugee arrives here. We look forward to working with him to ensure that there are enough opportunities for refugees to learn English, look for work, and rebuild their lives as part of thriving, successful communities.”

We would like to know how much this scheme is going go cost and why there are no plans to help the huge number of long-term British-born unemployed living in London.

The only bright side is that Mr Johnson is doing a damn good job convincing the indigenous that voting Tory is useless and the white working class abandoned by Labour will see the BNP as the only party who cares for them.

If this is what our government and the other parties plan to do in their deluded efforts to reconnect with voters, our chances of getting control of Barking & Dagenham can only get better.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Maybe it’s a concidence but just a few weeks after Swiss voters supported a ban on minarets, the Swiss government announced Friday it would halve from next year its quota of permits for workers from outside Europe, with unemployment and immigration at high levels.

The Swiss government also announced a drop in immigration from EU countries and so held back on invoking a clause that would allow it to temporarily bar European workers to protect its job market.

For workers outside of Europe, “A maximum of 2,000 residency permits and 3,500 short-term residency permits can be issued next year, half for the year underway,” it said in a statement.

These quotas could be revised in June, it said.

The government also said it would decide next year whether to activate a safeguard clause that allows Bern to impose temporary restrictions on Europeans working in Switzerland in specific circumstances.

The clause was built into a deal with the European Union that allows European workers to take up jobs in Switzerland without being subject to the work permit quota system.

Unemployment in Switzerland hit a four-year-high in October, reaching 4.0 percent, while inward migration is expected to reach 70,000 for 2009.

Last year it registered its biggest rise in permanent resident population in 40 years amid record immigration.

Swiss Economy Minister Doris Leuthard said in media reports last month that the government made a mistake by deciding in May not to invoke the safeguard clause which “could have kept thousands of people away from the Swiss job market.”

Good for the Swiss that they have politicians who still take their concern about immigration seriously, unlike our Home Secretary who is not going to lose his sleep if the UK is swamped with immigrants.

Mrs Leuthard is implementing the kind of common sense policies that the British National Party has supported for a long time and no one, so far, has accused her of pandering to racist myths.

If Switzerland can protect its job market, why Britain cannot do the same?

We know the answer, don’t we?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

A few days after Trevor Phillips, the Guyana-born fat cat in charge of the EHRC, started a legal action against the British National Party for our whites-only’ membership rule, it came to our attention that some ethnic minorities’ staff working for the equality body were asked to join the BNP in order to prove that our party discriminate against blacks and asians.

Someone working at the EHRC wrote to BNP central office and blew the whistle, because of that the party had to stop accepting new members, a move that is costing us dear in term of lost revenue.

‘The Daily Telegraph’ quickly stepped in saying this was a lie but the Sunday Times wrote an article confirming the existence of the sting:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6945883.ece

Also here on Green Arrow is evidence. http://tinyurl.com/yexef4z

Apparently some senior staff refused to carry out this plan for fear of “reprisal” from BNP members!!!!!.

Why they didn’t contact the Police if they were in fear of being assaulted, or possibly might be badgered into becoming involved in an attempt to subvert the democratic system we have in our country is not clear, after all the establishment always find ways to harass and persecute anyone belonging to the BNP.

Notice how well written and balanced it is, and also portrays the BNP in a positive light.

Nationalists should be delighted but the fact is that this article should be read with suspicion, given that Rupert Murdoch has nothing but hatred for the BNP.

So what is going on?

One possibility is that Mr Phillips is facing an onslaught from the Jewish community.

When the EHRC started the legal action against the BNP, the only criticism came from the ‘Jewish Chronicle’ and Spiked, an online magazine.

The Jewish establishment fears that if the BNP is forced to open its membership to non-whites, Jewish organizations will be forced to accept non-Jewish.

If this is the case Trevor Phillips’ days as the head of the equality quango are numbered and his career is over.

Of course no one will shed a tear for the arrogant, talentless marxist who used the race card to get the top job and enrich himself at the expense of taxpayers.

It’s no secret that many in the Conservative party want to abolish the quango and oddly, his decision to prosecute the BNP, may make this more likely.

Some right-wing commentators expressed concern that a BNP with blacks and asian members will be almost impossible to smear as the ‘racist’ tag will not apply anymore and therefore the new PM David Cameron will have to deal with a more powerful and popular BNP.

I recall some of them calling Mr Phillips an idiot.

Whatever the truth, we are living in interesting times

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As most internet savvy nationalists will know, ‘The Black Country’  members of the British National Party has launched it’s first ‘Christmas Lectures’.

The organizers should be congratulated on bringing back a British tradition that has all but been forgotten.

The really surprising thing is that this initiative has received a mention in the Financial Times (FT).

In an article headlined “White Christmas”, the Bible of City’ bankers and businessmen reports that the “Far-right British National Party” is dipping a toe into the festive events market with an evening of “BNP Christmas Lectures”. It is hard to believe that the theme will be “Peace and Goodwill to all Men”, a magician is promised. Presumably he only plucks white rabbits from his top hat.

The BNP has previously sold Christmas cards emblazoned with crosses, symbols it believed were threatened by political correctness (anyone seen what is happening to the Holy Cross in Italy? Duh!!). The party appeared not to have noticed that crosses are actually a feature of Easter. Or that there was an element of contradiction in also selling pagan cards emblazoned with Odin astride an eight-legged horse

jonathan.guthrie@ft.com

Mr Guthrie seems to have difficulty with the concept of the “Christmas Lectures”, this event is designed to raise awareness of something that was once integral within British culture, making people proud of their history.

He also ignores the incontrovertible fact that Christmas replaced a pagan celebration. After the Roman Empire converted to Christianity people felt the need to celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ.

Before conversion, at that time of the year people celebrated the winter solstice as the 13th of December it being the shortest day of the year after which the days begin to lengthen and the nights become shorter.

Because this celebration was very popular it was decided to mark the 25th of December as the day on which Jesus Christ was born.

Nationalists should not be too hard on Mr Guthrie, after all, he brought our event to the attention of the most influential people in the UK and beyond, a real Christmas present for our party.

The question is: why did FT report it in the first place?

Is it because of the the financial crisis and after lining their pockets with taxpayers money, bankers suddenly felt the need to enrich their souls?

Can’t see that idea run up the flag pole to see if it waves, can you?

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

P.S. links to learn more about Christmas and the Pagan celebration replaced by it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winter_solstice

http://blackcountrybnp.blogspot.com/

Share

A few days ago we reported on the British National Party campaign in London Conley trying to prevent the construction of a new mosque, and that Hertfordshire Police are examining BNP leaflets distributed in the area in the hope they incited racial hatred. ( not a chance, just facts. ed)

Well, we are happy to report that the local BNP (without acknowledgement from the council) scored an important victory.

An article published in the St Albans & Harpenden Review concerned a controversial proposal to build a mosque in London Colney (which provoked objections from around 180 residents ) was rejected at a planning meeting last night, with councillors intent on preventing the “far right” British National Party from scoring political points on the issue.

Residents turned out in force to oppose an Islamic Centre in the village, citing parking, traffic issues, road safety and noise as the prime objections.

Members of the Bangladeshi community, who also attended to hear the decision, had applied to change the use of Cemex House in Barnet Road, close to Riverside Industrial Estate, to accommodate up to 50 worshippers. But residents feared the facility would attract more of them than indicated in the application, and that the numbers could not be controlled.

After hearing representations from both parties, councillors sitting on the district council’s plans south committee refused the application, despite recommendations from an inspector to approve the proposals.

District councillor Dreda Gordon, who represents London Colney ward, took this opportunity to scupper the BNP’s campaign while opposing the plans on behalf of residents.

She said the “extremist” party, which is seeking to gain a foothold in the village, had used the dispute as a golden ticket to canvass support.

“London Colney is a tolerant community, and over the years it has accommodated people from many ethnic back grounds,” she said.

“These various groups made London Colney their home. They raised their children here, we are a culturally diverse community.

“People have worked and lived alongside each other in this area. I don’t want decent and tolerant people branded with loathsome politics of the far right which have raised their ugly head on this issue.”

But speaking to the Review after the meeting, actor Philip Madoc, who has lived in Waterside for 30 years, said: “The reasons aren’t biased, they’re logical. I’m not interested in whether it’s a mosque, or a synagogue or a big Welsh chapel, it is of no interest to me. (A NIMBY thespian luvvy? ed.) It’s an establishment in the silliest place.

“The village is a delightful place and old London Colney has got character. This summer has been the best I have ever seen it. It’s a glorious place and we want to preserve that or improve that. I hope that it will be as is.”

The application follows years of failed attempts to establish a mosque in the village to serve the Muslim community, which currently congregates at the Morris Playing Fields Pavillion.

Fahim Karim, Chairman of London Colney’s Islamic Centre, said: “We are disappointed and we are disheartened.

“There was no planning issue, they had to scratch to find a planning excuse. They refused it with no grounds. We are going to appeal and then someone outside the district will decide.” (What has become of local politics ?)

BNP member Danny Seabrook, who is vying for a seat on London Colney Parish Council following the death of Robin Cooper, insisted the planning decision would not derail his party’s election campaign. Mr Seabrook, 37, whose party has been accused of inciting racial hatred after distributing “offensive” leaflets to homes in the village, insisted his focus, if elected, would be the proposed railfreight terminal in Radlett.

This is a huge achievement, given that the BNP has no elected representatives in the area and proves that now we are a force to be reckoned with in London Colney.

Clearly the parish councillors understood our potential, as many of their unhappy voters would have supported us in the next election.

Unfortunately cases like this are still the exception not the rule, but this victory will give a much needed boost to our activists in London and beyond.

This victory came a few days after Swiss voters supported a proposal to ban the erection of minarets.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The appearance of BNP Chairman Nick Griffin at the UN climate change conference in Copenhagen has sparked uproar among the liberal ruling elite.

The funniest  comment came from Tory MP Tim Yeo, chairman of the ‘Commons Environmental Audit Committee’, who said:

“If the future prosperity of the human race, in the face of climate change (what happened to Global Warming? ed.), depends on the contributions of people like Nick Griffin, there is little hope for any of us.”

Interestingly Mr Griffin’ opinion about climate change is far from unique, actually is shared by Sunday Telegraph columnist Christopher Booker, and many Republicans in the USA.

We need to remember that former President George W. Bush refused to sign the Kyoto treaty, because he feared that American companies would have been forced to spend shed loads of money without achieving any reduction of emissions in the USA, and these would have been more than offset by increasing pollution from China and India.

Huge tracts of pristine countryside will need to be concreted over, in order to build new houses and flats to accommodate those newcomers; congestion is getting worse as more vehicles clog our streets and traffic jams are becoming more common and this, in turn, is increasing pollution as cars and trucks lie idle with their engines running; and don’t forget, new power plants need to be built to meet an increase in demand for electricity.

So the silence from the lambs of the Green party on that issue is surprising, the same can be said for all the other greeny groups, those so zealous in condemning the destruction of the Amazonian forest (and with good reason) but have nothing to say about the destruction of our ecosystem.

If and when Mr Griffin makes such a statement you can expect the MSM to use the old and tired ‘meme’ of racism and dismiss it as a nonsense rant.

Remember that this point of view is shared by many from all parts of the political spectrum.

Their real fear is that Mr Griffin when in Copenhagen, will expose another lie being used by the ‘Establishment’ to impose a new world order, and that more and more people will wake up and see the truth.

No one should be surprised that if, in a few years time another document is leaked to the press proving that government knew immigration was causing huge environmental damage but concealed it from the public because they wanted to turn Britain into a multiracial society.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

It seems to me, and many other “right thinking” people that Britain is no longer a democracy.

When Labour took power, and with cold rationality planned to swamp this country with immigrants to create a multicultural/racial society, several laws were enacted that criminalised anyone who dared oppose the plan on the pretext of protecting ethnic minorities from race-hate crimes.

Those laws made it illegal to say anything that someone else might find offensive, and therefore they curbed the freedom of speech that in any democracy is taken for granted.

The BNP has been investigated many times for producing and delivering leaflets that “someone” thought could/would incite racial hatred.

Therefore it is no surprise to hear that “vicious” leaflets aimed at keeping a mosque out of London Colney have been referred to the police ‘Harm Reduction Unit’.

The Herts Advertiser used the word “vicious” to describe the leaflets, in total compliance with the NUJ’ guidelines dictating that only derogatory terms can be used when reporting  on the BNP.

According to this article Police are now examining the British National Party (BNP) leaflets headed “Do you want to live under an oppressive Islamic Sharia government?” as possible incitement to racial hatred.

The leaflets were delivered to homes in London Colney, claiming that a planning application to turn Cemex House in Barnet Road into a mosque was part of a wider plot to turn St Albans into an Islamic city.

The large site – around 1,900 square metres – with provision for 33 car parking spaces consists of two separate parcels of land on either side of Lowbell Lane.

The man behind the leaflets is Danny Seabrook, 36, a divorced self-employed builder who lives in London Colney. He stood as a county council candidate for the BNP recently in Watford.

He denies incitement to racial hatred saying the leaflets are “factual and to the point”.

He went on: “A mosque would be out of keeping in the village. St Albans is a Christian city. You give an inch and they take a mile. They’ll have minarets up there next.”

A part of the leaflet includes the accusation that politicians pander to Islamists’ every demand for ever more preferential treatment, and the majority of residents want to keep the area as it is.

County Cllr for London Colney, Chris Brazier, said: “This is detestable and I don’t think there would have been this reaction if the plan was to turn it into a Christian church.

“The BNP do seem to be targeting London Colney since they picked up 200 votes in the recent county council elections.”

Cllr Brazier conceded that he had received almost 100 letters from residents opposing the plans on legitimate planning grounds including traffic fears, narrowness of the access road, insufficient parking and noise. He maintained there was no suggestion of racism in any of the moderately-worded letters.

He said the application had aroused fears that such a large mosque would attract significant numbers of visitors from outside the area, raising traffic and parking issues for residents.

But Peter Trevelyan, acting for the London Colney Islamic Group which submitted the application, said: “Having been frustrated in its search for suitable premises, the local community currently uses the parish meeting room on White Horse Lane once a week for Friday prayers. The main hall is small and inconvenient in shape and, with 50 people present, is cramped and over-crowded.”

He said prayers would take place five times a day but the principal focus for prayer would be at 1pm on Fridays when attendance varied between 40 and 50 men and a handful of women. The majority would walk to the site from homes and employment nearby.

Council officers have recommended to a planning meeting on Monday that the scheme should be approved because there would be adequate off street parking and no acceptable harm to highway safety, or the free and safe flow of traffic.

Maybe the local council could hold a referendum and see if the people of London Colney agree with this plan, but local politicians clearly don’t trust voters as they would not be able to make the right decision.

After all, native Britons have never been asked if they want to be dispossessed by unprecedented waves of third-world immigration and the Police are used, not to fight crime, but to harass anyone who dares to complain about it.

Welcome to the new fascist Britain.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

If anyone is looking for evidence of the damage caused by mass immigration in the last 30 years, they need look no further than Tower Hamlets.

This borough was not just overwhelmingly white, but the white working class living there formed a cohesive spirit of community in which people looked after each other.

Things changed when Labour and Conservative governments of yore began to alter the demographics, encouraging migrants from Bangladesh to settle there so they would become the majority, and the native Britons (white flight) would be forced to move elsewhere.

Old time nationalists will remember how, in 1993 Derek Beacon, a candidate in the bye-election for Millwall, became the first elected councillor for the British National Party.

After which, the local council encouraged the mass exodus of white British that used to live on the council estates, and replaced them with Asians, to ensure that no BNP candidate could be elected again.

The islamification of Tower Hamlets is now a sad reality, so it is not surprising that the Town Hall is proposing to ban the open-plan design in new housing developments because open-plan is unpopular with Asian families.

A six-month investigation by Tower Hamlets found affordable units in the borough (aimed at key workers and those on low incomes) were vacant. (there are more than 22,000 people on its housing waiting lists).

The council believes this is because many families, particularly those of Asian origin, are not happy with homes that have a combined kitchen and living space. A report on the problem says: “Separate provision would be much more suited because the [Asian] lifestyle requires separate seating space for male and female visitors and also the type of food cooked, heavy in oil and spices, which can have strong odours.”

Despite the borough’s large Asian community (almost 37 per cent of the population, according to the latest census) only 12 per cent of the open-plan units were sold to Asian buyers. Almost 70 per cent of those sold recently have gone to white people.

Tower Hamlets is now set to alter its planning guidance to specify the need for separate rooms in all new developments. The Greater London Authority has recommended separate living and kitchen areas in large family units.

The move comes after Mayor Boris Johnson attacked the trend for building small “Hobbit homes” in the capital.

Developers prefer open-plan designs because they are cheaper to build. But, if they fail to find the extra space in family-sized affordable homes in Tower Hamlets, they are unlikely to win planning permission.

Waiseul Islam, chairman of the council’s group on affordable home ownership, said: “Overcrowding and the demand for social housing have continued to rise locally, and shared-ownership schemes designed to assist people into home ownership haven’t been as successful as anticipated.”

The council group reported anecdotal evidence that shared-ownership flats were empty. The report concluded: “In all planning pre-applications meetings officers do try to influence the design of affordable housing units, and stress that there should be separate kitchen areas in family-sized units.” The report is due to be rubber-stamped by Tower Hamlets cabinet committee on 2 December.

Of course, had white British made a similar complaint you can be absolutely sure they would have been ignored, after all in Labour run Britain the native British are at the back of the queue.

For NuLab there is more bad news, it is hated by the remaining native Britons in Tower Hamlets,  and not just because of the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The NuLab council wanted to close Bancroft library, a library containing a culturally rich archive on the history of the East End.

It retracted its plans after loud protests from residents and celebrities who feared the move would have caused the loss of valuable historical documents.

Then there was the plan for redevelopment of a site left empty by the closure of a Morrisons supermarket.

Local residents wanted a new supermarket and not a huge apartments block built on the plot.

The list goes on, but the examples above help to explain why Labour is so desperate to appease the Asian voter.

Tower Hamlets, for good or bad, is a mirror of what is going on in Britain today.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As we nationalists know only too well, the reason mainstream media keep attacking the British National Party is because the marxist dominated’ National Union of Journalists (NUJ) says in it’s guide, “the BNP must get only negative coverage.”

For too long many in the media sector have complained about the negative influence this powerful union has had on independent reportage.

I am sure everyone will be delighted to know that the NUJ is having financial problems.

According to Press Gazette, the National Union of Journalists is to cut the frequency of its policy-making conferences and raise subscriptions to combat a projected annual budget deficit of £600,000 by 2011.

Delegates at the NUJ’s General Meeting voted to switch from holding a conference every 12 months to one every year-and-a-half to shave £67,000 from the union’s annual budget as General Secretary Jeremy Dear warned about the potential hardship the union faced if cuts were not made.

AGM delegates also voted to raise union subs to help bring in an additional £155,000 annually after Dear told the conference in Southport, the union needed to stem an annual drop in income of more than £200,000.

The union’s funds were falling short as more than 550 journalists had left the union in the past year (probably ex Mirror group) Dear said, and it was now also making an annual payment of £160,000 to meet a pension shortfall of £1.8m.

Dear said: “We have to take tough decisions to save this union…

“Even if there was no inflation in the next three years, if membership did not decline, if staff receive no pay rises and paid no costs for transport, rent, heating or any other supplies, we are facing a budget deficit of £600,000 per year by 2011.”

Dear said the union was also taking a series of measures to reduce costs and increase income, including cutting staff, renegotiating contracts and renting out part of its Grey’s Inn Road headquarters, in London.

The motions passed by AGM are expected to create an extra £200,000. Other steps taken by the NUJ a spokesman told Press Gazette later, amounted to a saving of around £400,000 per year, helping it balance its budget.

However, the plan put forward by the union’s national executive committee to move the conference to an 18 month cycle caused fierce debate on the conference floor, with a number of delegates fearing union democracy (sic) could be compromised by the move.

Dear added: “We can have a conference every 12 months but we will not be able to afford to do the things our members want us to. More talk and less action is not the recipe for a campaigning union.”

Indeed the sooner the NUJ disappears the better as this organization is clearly a threat to democracy and free speech.

It may be interesting to know why fewer journalists are joining.

Whatever the reason, the NUJ and its members are beginning to pay the price for their contempt of the native Briton and anyone else that dares to oppose their plans and reject their promotion of a poisonous ideology.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As all nationalists know, the ‘Trinity Mirror Group’, publisher of the Daily Mirror and the Sunday Mirror, has joined forces with anti-fascist groups to print lies and smear stories, in a vain attempt to dissuade people from supporting the British National Party.

How interesting is it, that journalists claim to represent the working class, but just like their paymasters in Parliament they enjoy fat salaries, generous perks, and nice gold plated pensions?   They do not suffer the hardships that ordinary working people do.

So it is with a degree of schadenfreude I hear the welcome news that owing to the downturn in dead tree press revenue, TMG is to close its final salary pension scheme to existing members due to the increased cost of providing the service.

The publisher, which owns five national newspapers including the Mirror and the Sunday Mirror along with a string of regional titles, announced late last week the move was necessary as its pension fund deficit had risen from £37m in 2001 to £275m by June.

The decision was communicated across the publishing group via an email memo late on Friday. It said the company would implement the change after a two-month consultation with its staff.

TMG closed the scheme to new members in 2003 but said the state of the financial markets, new regulations and rising life expectancy made it necessary to implement the change to existing members.

The group’s 3,000 active members will now be offered the chance to change to a “defined contributions scheme” where pension payouts will be related to the amount paid in rather than a fixed amount relating to an employees salary at the end of their career.

The move was condemned of the National Union of Journalists.

Paul Holleran NUJ Scottish secretary, said: “This announcement on a Friday afternoon has left many of our members shell-shocked. (Hehehehe, much wailing and gnashing of teeth in the wine bars that evening i’ll bet .) ed.

“The scrapping of the final salary scheme is the latest in a long line of attacks on staff at TMG and serious questions need to be asked, and answered about the capability of the senior Trinity directors.”

TMG issued a statement this morning: “Closing these schemes to future accrual would help limit the increase in liabilities in the defined benefit pension schemes and help the group to fulfil its commitment to eliminate the current deficit.”

Express Newspapers’ plan to close its final salary pension scheme to existing members emerged last October with that publisher similarly claming that the scheme was proving too costly to maintain.

At least those hard-core marxists of the NUJ are starting to get a taste of what it means to live in the real world.

The problem with antifascists is that they never had a real job, actually many have never worked a single day in their lives.

Hopefully more and more people will refuse to buy newspapers until they are bankrupted one by one and finally stop poisoning peoples mind’ with their lies and politically correct nonsense.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

This was the 3rd year that Merton & Wandsworth branch of the British National Party had attended the Remembrance Sunday Parade in Mitcham, South London. During the procession we clapped and cheered as ex service men along with children from local youth organisations made their way from the Poppy Club to the war memorial. In all over 150 members, supporters, and friends of our branch were in attendance to commemorate our fallen hero’s in past and present conflicts after which we retired to a local hostelry which had kindly laid on a free buffet for us to enjoy on this most important of days.

A special thank-you to Bob, Brian and Ricky, all previous serving members of the Parachute Regiment, to Jackie and Brian  for arranging and laying our wreath and to Brian and Paul for organising our attendance.

Share

Update on the attack at Becontree. As I have already said, I blame Labour politicians for the attack on 5th of November 2009 when one of a pack of black teenagers threw a glass bottle at me outside Becontree station.

I have posted the Crudass comment, this is the one from Margaret Hodge MP for Barking:

Dear Giuseppe De Santis

Your allegations are not offensive – they are merely daft. Mrs Hodge condemns all acts of anti-social and criminal behaviour regardless of who perpetrates them.

Mike Haywood
Head of Office
Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP

You will have noticed that the email was written by one of her assistants, she probably didn’t read it at all.

Clearly she is too busy to look at the problems of people living in her constituency, and delegates this task to her assistants.

But this should surprise nobody.

A few years ago she said very clearly, Labour doesn’t need the support of the white-working class as immigrants will replace them as Labour voters.

It may explain why, when Ford closed the car factory in Dagenham she did nothing to protest against its closure and then told redundant factory workers they could stack shelves in Tesco.

When those neglected workers embraced the British National Party en-masse, she complained to the press expressing fear that 8 out of 10 whites would support the BNP.

After we had 12 councillors elected she and Jon Cruddas decided to swamp the borough with immigrants, something that is evident to anybody who lives in the Borough.

As the BNP grows in size, and could take control of Barking & Dagenham, she and Cruddas encourage by their inactivity, UAF thugs to intimidate BNP activists and urge them to use violence against us: This is why those black teenagers felt entitled to throw a glass bottle at me.

If Mrs Hodge condemns ‘acts of criminal behaviour’, why has she never blasted the UAF for allowing its thugs to assault BNP activists?

Why has she never stood in the cold collecting signatures for the campaign against knife-crime?

Richard Barnbrook did it a lot, and many who signed were black and asian, they could see that somebody who is called a “fascist and racist” was there to listen and cared about a problem that affects all communities.

We don’t need to comment further on that as we know the answer.

Like Jon Cruddas and others in the Labour party, she is deliberately engineering the destruction of this country for their own interest, and she treats her voters with contempt, but as those voters are starting to wake up she need something to intimidate them.

Let’s not forget that the woman who called BNP supporters fascist was council leader in Islington, covered up a paedophile ring who were abusing vulnerable children and were then put into care.

When this scandal emerged Mrs Hodge did nothing to help the authorities bring the culprits to justice, but attacked the victims claiming they were making up their stories.

This is the woman who is representing Barking, a bully who rubs shoulders with paedophiles, and allows all sort of foreign filth to move into the borough and make life a misery for law abiding people.

I make no apology for attacking her, she is unfit not just to be an MP, but to be in this country.

It’s time for her to face public outcry.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As readers of  ’London Patriot’ will know, on Thursday the 5th of November 2009, one of a pack of black teenagers threw a glass bottle at me.

I have said before I don’t blame the black teenagers, I blame the Labour party for allowing their ancestors into our country in the first place.

Conveniently, it was revealed that in 2003 the ‘Home Office’ told immigration officers to fast track applications, even if this meant allowing dangerous or criminal foreigners entry to the UK.

This is why it’s time now to blame politicians for every crime carried out by people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place.

One of these politicians is Dagenham MP Jon Cruddas.

He claims to represent the working class, but he lives in a posh flat in Notting Hill, places his children in an exclusive school, and has bought three homes by abusing the ACA. How representative is that?

He and Margaret Hodge have allowed Barking & Dagenham to become swamped with immigrants in order to stay in power by using their vote (gerrymandering).

When they realised there was a chance that the BNP could take control of Barking & Dagenham, they decided to use UAF thugs to attack and intimidate BNP activists and incite ordinary people to use violence against us. This is why the pack of black youths felt empowered to throw a glass bottle at me.

When I complained to Jon Cruddas he sent me the following reply:

“Mr de santis I am very sorry to hear of your distress and the violent act you were a victim of. Not sure why I am responsible though; I would never incite people to attack you lot (he can’t even bring himself to use BNP) and have been critical of some (but not all?) who have in the past- all the best- jon”

This is a lie, Mr Cruddas is a UAF supporter and regularly writes in the ‘Daily Mirror’, a newspaper working together with antifascist groups to campaign against the British National Party. These leftwing rags on more than one occasion have incited people to use violence against BNP activists, if he is so squeaky clean why does he support UAF thugs? Let him deny his allegiance to UAF.

Let’s not forget he was touted to become Labour’ deputy leader and minister but he gave up to concentrate his efforts in stopping the BNP.

I didn’t get any reply from Margaret Hodge or any other Barking & Dagenahm’ councillors but I’m not surprised, after all they never cared about white people living in the borough.

I make no apology for naming and shaming politicians in this blog, it is about time they paid for their crimes.

This is why I urge nationalists to direct their anger to them.

Their contact details are in the article I posted a few days ago:

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/11/07/black-teenager-throws-glass-bottle-at-bnp-activists/

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

A piece of quality journalism today in the ‘Sunday Times’, a study for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, so far the most comprehensive official analysis of the BNP produced, supported by polling from ICM. It was based on three samples of 1,500 people in Blackburn, Northwest Leicestershire and Stoke-on-Trent.

According to a leaked Whitehall report 18% of those polled in three areas where our support is strongest said they would vote BNP. The report says this would be an increase from 12% in previous polls.

The disclosure that almost one in five voters in some areas say they plan to back the party will set alarm bells ringing in government.

Michael Thrasher, professor of politics at Plymouth University, said 18% was not enough to win the BNP seats in parliament.

However, it could split the Labour vote in some seats, such as Blackburn, where Jack Straw the Justice secretary is MP, and the Tories came second in the 2005 election.

This weekend Phil Woolas, the Borders and Immigration minister said the analysis showed the BNP now posed “a significant threat” to the main parties.

Woolas, MP for Oldham East & Saddleworth, said he was surprised at the high level of BNP support in Blackburn, but that in Stoke separatist Islamic groups were creating a “very worrying” backlash of support for the BNP.

He said: “The British National Party is a significant threat in electoral terms in parts of our country as this poll confirms. The mainstream (media; ed) parties must focus on grassroots politics. This can’t be done in television studios in London. (as was shown by the Bearpit that was the Nick Griffin interview) It has to be done in the streets.”

Details of the report are being kept under wraps pending publication in the next few weeks. But it will reinforce concerns that the BNP is growing.

In the 2005 election the BNP received 0.7% of the vote. In June this year it won its first two seats in the European Parliament. In Yorkshire, the Humber, and the Northwest, Nick Griffin, the party chairman, won 8%.

It is also reassuring to hear Mr Woolas will not, or cannot do anything to stop the growth of the British National Party.

Whatever Mr Woolas says about grassroots politics, the fact is the British National Party is the only political party with activists who are prepared to go leafletting, canvassing, and hold paper sales without payment; we do not rely on students, or job seekers being paid £5 for every 500 leaflets delivered, we do it for our country and Party.

Everyone in Barking & Dagenham can see we are on the streets being proactive, even the ones who hates us can’t ignore us, it’s difficult to remember the last time NuLabour had activists out promulgating  NuLab policies.

The truth is Labour doesn’t have many activists who can campaign on the streets, or are they scared to meet ordinary people because they are loathed by the ‘Common Man’.

They know they are loathed, and that is why they use the MSM to attack us, and UAF thugs to intimidate us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As Herr Trevor Phillips, head of the EHRC prompted legal action against the BNP for our white-only membership, so ethnic minorities staff in the EHRC have been urged to apply for membership of the BNP, the only party representing the indigenous population of this country and could, by these politically motivated, underhand and sleazy machinations be accused of racial discrimination.

http://www.leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/

A month ago we received an anonymous letter from insiders at the Equality Commission concerning an incident during an EHRC staff meeting a few weeks before the BNP were forced to go to court to fight a case initiated by the EHRC.

This whistle blower in the EHRC named Tim Wainwright, the EHRC director of the English regions, as holding a formal EHRC meeting on the 10th July 2009 where he asked the Black, Asian and other ethnic minority EHRC staff who were present at that meeting to join the BNP, asked them to ask other ethnic minority staff members of the EHRC to join the BNP and asked them ask the friends and family of ethnic staff members of the EHRC to also join the BNP.

This was done so that ;

1) The EHRC could then use the fact that they had been turned down for membership of the BNP as evidence to bolster the EHRC legal case against the BNP

2) To allow them to then apply to the EHRC for tax payer funded legal representation provided by the EHRC and initiate civil court actions against the BNP for Direct Racial Discrimination in relation to its membership policy

3) This would then allow the EHRC staff and family members to claim racial discrimination against the BNP and claim hundreds of thousands of pounds from the BNP in compensation and bankrupt the party

4) At the same time the staff of the EHRC would make vast amounts of money personally from the scheme in compensation and the legal costs awarded against the BNP in relation to the fees of EHRC lawyers would then go back into the EHRC coffers to fund more cases against the BNP

So we can see that the plan was that EHRC staff would be able to personally enrich themselves by using EHRC lawyers to run the cases, which would be funded by the EHRC and with tax payers money.

There is at present a formal investigation underway in the EHRC into the allegations.

Until now we couldn’t confirm this story and some Daily Telegraph’ bloggers denied the existence of this plan.

However Personnel Today not only confirmed that but reported a story claiming that the equality watchdog is conducting an internal investigation into allegations that a director requested names of ethnic minority staff that could be asked to join the British National Party (BNP).

A source told Personnel Today that the director asked colleagues in a teleconference to identify employees at the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) from black and ethnic minority backgrounds who could be asked to join the far-right BNP.

The EHRC allegedly wanted to gather evidence that the BNP refused membership to minority applicants, in the build up to its legal case against the party’s rules. The far-right party has subsequently agreed to change its constitution and membership rules.

In a letter to Personnel Today, the source said: “[The director] clearly ignored the legal, ethical and public safety implication of [his or her] advice. We have learnt that all staff present in the teleconference rejected the advice of [the director] and have officially complained against [that person].”

Personnel Today contacted members of staff allegedly involved in the teleconference, who confirmed the incident was currently being investigated, but refused to provide further details.

The source claimed the staff involved in the teleconference have since been “treated with suspicion” and labelled “troublemakers”.

“Some directors have even chosen to make derogatory remarks against [the staff] rather than taking any firm action against [the director],” the source added.

Jeya Thiruchelvam, employment law editor at XpertHR, warned the alleged actions by the director could constitute race discrimination.

She said: “Ironically, the act of requesting or instructing non-white employees to join the BNP, even if the aim is to highlight the assertion that the BNP is continuing to restrict its membership on racial grounds, and is therefore inherently racist, may well constitute direct race discrimination.

“This is because you have a situation where employees are being selected on the grounds of their race (or ethnic or national origin) and being treated less favourably – by being requested to a join a far-right extremist political party – than their white colleagues.”

An EHRC spokeswoman did not deny the allegations, but said: “An internal investigation is ongoing at the moment. It is not, and has never been, the policy of the commission to encourage anyone to join or attempt to join the BNP. The commission has never authorised anyone to issue any such instructions.”

Pressure grows on EHRC chairman

Meanwhile, the behaviour of the EHRC’s chairman, Trevor Phillips, is under scrutiny by the Joint Committee on Human Rights, following accusations he “isolated” and “intimidated” other commissioners, some of whom subsequently resigned. Phillips is due to give evidence to the committee of MPs on 10 November.

This is a scandalous episode in the EHRC.

The buck ultimately lies at the top with Trevor Phillips.

The EHRC is the most institutionally racist and corrupt public institution in Britain.

It is not only above the law, it is able to issue rules and regulations under the Race Relations Acts that bypass Parliament entirely.

There is no democratic accountability at all by the EHRC.

It receives a yearly budget of 70 million per year from the tax payer and employs 400 staff.

In recent months various senior officials have resigned due to bullying and amidst calls of internal incompetence at the senior level.

The case against the BNP was a politically motivated case – we all know that.

But to have a situation where EHRC senior staff are using the resources of the EHRC to personally enrich EHRC staff using tax payer money is a disgusting abuse of power.

The fact that a cover up is underway using the FOI legislation designed to ensure transparency and accountability for public bodies and public servants is scandalous.

The ethnic minority members of staff at the 10 th July meeting refused point blank to go along with the plan of Tim Wainwright.

They realised that the plan was a criminal conspiracy as defined under the Fraud Act 2006 – “Fraud by abuse of position” is defined by Section 4 of the Act as a case where a person occupies a position where they are expected to safeguard the financial interests of another person, and abuses that position; this includes cases where the abuse consisted of an omission rather than an overt act.

They had the integrity to refuse the plan and also to whistle blow the plot.

It now appears that senior EHRC staff are now bullying, victimising and harassing those people in the EHRC that they suspect of leaking the information to the BNP.

Trevor Phillips is clearly following Lenin’ footsteps, after all he is a fan of the communist master.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

You will no doubt remember how a few days ago the technology editor of The Guardian, in his blog, didn’t quite call for the illegal hacking of the British National Party’ website, but did encourage others to do it for him. Welllll!!! I almost wet myself at this one.

By a strange twist of the fate ‘The Guardian’ jobs site has been hacked.

According to Press Gazette ‘The Guardian’ has written half a million users of its jobs site suggesting they take action to protect themselves from identity fraud in the wake of a hacker attack.

The site, which according to ‘The Guardian’ is run by outside company Madgex, was targeted over the weekend.

In a message to users Guardian News and Media said: “The Guardian Jobs website has been targeted by a sophisticated and deliberate hack, which has breached the security of the data on the site. You have used the site to make one or more job applications and we believe your personal data, relating to those applications, may have been accessed.

“We are absolutely committed to the privacy of our users, and would like to assure you that we are treating this situation with the utmost seriousness. The matter has been reported to the police, who are now undertaking a full investigation through the police central e-crime unit at New Scotland Yard.

“We have no reason to believe that any financial or bank data was compromised in this incident. However the police advise that those whose personal data may have been stolen in this way should take a number of precautionary measures.”

These measures are to contact your creditors, so they can monitor your accounts, contact a credit reference agency who can help take preventative measures and to subscribe to fraud prevention service Cifas at a cost of £12. This last option places a notice on your credit file warning that you may be a target of identity fraud.

So now they are getting a taste of their own medicine. Maybe they need a new technology editor, or if not maybe an OpEd by him on how to prevent further intrusion?

What goes around comes around. ROFWML.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The UAF never ceases to amaze me!

Just as the mainstream media start another massive smear campaign to stop the”fascist” BNP, and prevent our supposed, “evil” policies from being implemented, the UAF thugs are behaving, yet again, like Benito Mussolini’ blackshirts.

According to a local paper protestors pelted British National Party members with eggs and tried to scale a wall outside a fundraising dinner.
Around 100 protesters turned up at The Chase Hotel in Ross-on-Wye on Saturday.

They demonstrated their anger with banners and placards shortly before 5pm.
A 19-year-old man from Worcester was given a fixed penalty notice for a minor public order offence.

Protester Tegan Cooper, 25, from Linton, said: “I heard about the protest on Friday and decided to go along.

“I don’t agree with the BNP policies at all and I wanted to show my anger at the people who do by joining in.

“There were about 100 people at the hotel with flags and banners.
“Quite a lot of people went in but we didn’t see Nick Griffin.

“We shouted at the other people as they went in and some people threw eggs.
“Two women even managed to climb the wall of the hotel but they were soon dragged out.

“Hopefully the BNP will now realise what people think of them.” (Oh yes, I think the people are beginning to understand what the BNP is about, and that freedom is something worth fighting for!)
The party hit the headlines this week when leader Nick Griffin was controversially invited as a guest on the BBC’s Question Time programme on Thursday.

Administrator Sarah Brown, 28, felt it was important to show the party was not welcome in her home town. She said: ”I live in Ross-on-Wye so when I heard the BNP were due to hold a meeting here I felt outraged.” Her home town?  What about the others whose home it is, did she ask anyone else, or is this paper shuffler dictating what they should think?

Dozens of police officers, including riot vans and police dogs, were seen at the hotel.
Cars hooted their horns as they passed the hotel and police with sniffer dogs walked around the walls of the hotel grounds.

A West Mercia Police spokesman said: “A 19-year-old man from Worcestershire was dealt with by police as a result of the protest. He was given a fixed penalty notice for a minor public order offence.”

Nick Griffin and BNP delegates left the hotel yesterday following the dinner on Saturday night.

Retired MP and chairman of Hereford Labour Party Bob Clay, 63, said the police presence at the hotel was a waste of taxpayers’ money.

No one from the BNP was available to comment on the protest.
A spokesman for The Chase Hotel refused to comment on whether or not it hosted the BNP, but confirmed the hotel was closed for a private function on Saturday.

So another BNP event is targeted by the Antifa prepared to use violence against supporters of a Non Proscribed political party, and a Labour officer hinting that Police shouldn’t have been there to prevent trouble.

This event was studiously ignored by the MSM, exposing their double standards, they are only too happy to ignore the Antifa thugs when it suits them, but oh! the irony. .                                                                                     “UAF thugs attack peaceful gathering at a private function”, or,                                                                                 “BNP banquet to raise £250k flops” If I didn’t find ‘The Sun’ headline so funny I would think they were using irony.

This one exception was ‘The Sun’, which published a story, “BNP banquet to raise £250k flops” the author, Ryan Sabey, could well be a candidate for the Pulitzer Prize for silliness (something we should invent). Peter Rabbit, and Bunny Fluffikins sounds more his standard.

Leaving aside the lies that are a regular feature of the Rupert Murdoch’ rag. It would be interesting to know where this reporter gets his information. Who told him we hoped to raise £250,000 in a gala dinner?  These are the kind of figures that NuLab and the others get from big business, our supporters are not that wealthy.

This is maybe one third of the whole BNP budget and our treasurer would jump with joy if we could get just one tenth of this sum to boost our coffers.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share