We all know that the establishment puts an enormous amount of effort into destroying the British National Party.

Thus far they have failed, but they will not give up.

We are the only party prepared to address issues that affect a large part of the electorate, one of these issues is housing.

Anyone on the waiting list for council accommodation is well aware that immigrants and asylum seekers are not only at the front of the queue but get the newest and best houses and flats.

The government has not only denied this, but accuses us of incitement to racial hatred for exposing a scandal that has been widely known for a long time.

it seems our efforts are beginning to pay off as the Daily Express reports that town hall chiefs will be given more freedom to put British-born families ahead of immigrants in the queue for council houses under new Government proposals to be unveiled this autumn.

Ministers want local authorities to ease the growing resentment among many white working class voters that newcomers are getting preferential treatment.

They want “local connections” to count in applications for social housing rather than handing out homes simply on the basis of need.

But the plan goes directly against multi-cultural equality programmes that were promoted under Labour, and it is likely to be resisted by many Labour-run councils.

Tory Housing Minister Grant Shapps yesterday acknowledged current rules for allocating social homes were breeding resentment.

He said: “It causes a great deal of concern and is very problematic for social cohesion when people find they aren’t provided with any preference when they are actually in the area they have lived in for a very long time.”

He said councils will be expected to take into account “the desire of local people” when drawing up their housing policies.

Mr Shapps added: “We plan to provide more flexibility to local authorities to judge the proper criteria for the waiting list. Apart from a limited number of prescribed cases — homelessness, for example — there should be the flexibility to write your own housing allocation criteria.”

Resentment over council housing is credited with boosting support in deprived areas for ‘extreme-Right’ organisations such as the British National Party. Recent research suggests that more than one in 10 of the country’s 3.5 million social homes goes to immigrants.

And more than £230million of taxpayers’ money is spent every year providing homes for asylum seekers. Under present rules, councils are expected to allocate council houses on the basis of need. The result is that the homeless, the elderly and families with many children living in cramped conditions tend to come first.

This means that immigrant families, which are frequently larger than their British-born counterparts may take precedence in the queue.

Around five million applicants across the country are currently on the waiting list. The rules state that immigrants must be settled in the UK, or come from an EU country to qualify for housing.
Councillor Edward Lister, Conservative leader of Wandsworth Council in south London said: “If the housing allocation rules are going to be changed, we would welcome that. We want to give a measure of priority to local residents. It builds stability in the community and keeps families together.”

We will wait to see if this proposal becomes law as this coalition government cannot be trusted to return all five of your fingers if you shake hands with them.

There is no doubt that a change in the criteria for allocation of council accommodation is long overdue.

Even if (a bloody big if) there is a sensible case for mass immigration, it doesn’t mean that these newcomers should get council housing as this undermines the weak argument about the (supposedly) economic benefit of mass immigration.

It is not a coincidence that the present and previous governments, rather than trying to defend the indefensible, denied that such discrimination was taking place and accused us of telling lies.

Unfortunately for them the huge number of indigenous Britons on the waiting list for housing means there are the same number of potential BNP supporters, and no amount of smear campaigns will convince the people they can trust the Lib Con alliance. This is why Labour Barking MP Margaret Hodge, a couple of months ago who told BNP activists to “pack up and leave”, wrote an article in the Daily Telegraph claiming that the ‘far-right’ can be defeated for good only if long term residents get priority in the assigning of council houses and benefits.
Hmmmmmm, I think she knows her goose is cooked if this “local connection” law is not passed.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

There must be something wrong with Trevor Phillips, the Guyana-born chief of the EHRC.

First he started legal action against the British National Party because our constitution didn’t allow non-whites to become members and forced us to change this.

Never mind that there is a principle called freedom of association, a basic human right that give individuals free choice to whom they choose to associate with, but we all know this was just an excuse for the establishment to destroy us (and by the way, how many blacks and Asians would join anyway?).

However even this was not enough, and now Herr Phillips is threatening to jail BNP Chairman Nick Griffin for contempt of court because some parts of our political programme may indirectly discriminate against minorities.

But just like a drug addict needing stronger stuff to stay high, Phillips needs to find new targets to satisfy his thirst for power.

Apparently the EHRC said it was considering whether to take the Treasury to court.

The quango said it feared Chancellor George Osborne had not investigated the impact of his Budget on vulnerable groups – such as women, the elderly, the disabled and ethnic minorities – as legally required.

The Treasury is also facing legal action from women’s rights group the Fawcett Society, which says ministers took no account of the Budget’s effect on women.

It comes a day after the Institute for Fiscal Studies, a highly respected think-tank, said Mr Osborne’s financial changes were ‘clearly regressive’, hitting the poor and families with children hardest.

This contradicts official claims from the Chancellor and his Lib Dem allies that the budget was ‘fair’ and ‘progressive’.

Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, facing increasing clamour from his Lib Dem backbenchers, was forced to defend the Budget.

‘This IFS analysis is by definition partial,’ he said. ‘It does not include the things we want to do to get people off benefits and into work.’

Mr Clegg, whose personal and party poll ratings have fallen through the floor in recent weeks, said the Government’s plans also included a pupil premium to improve education opportunities for poorer children and further changes to the tax system.

But Mike Hancock, Lib Dem MP for Portsmouth South, said: ‘We didn’t sign up for a Coalition that was going to hurt the poorest people in society, and I certainly didn’t get elected to do that ever.’

He said that unless Mr Clegg came up with a good answer to the IFS report, there would be a ‘very sticky’ upcoming Lib Dem party conference and serious thinking by members generally’.

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission said one option being considered was applying for a judicial review into the Budget, while another was sending in a hit squad to work with Treasury civil servants on equality issues.

Neil Kinghan, the quango’s chief executive, said equalities legislation was ‘not designed to prevent reductions in public expenditure’, adding: ‘Its role, and the commission’s role, is to ensure fairness is at the heart of decisions.’

He said the commission had asked the Chief Secretary to the Treasury, Danny Alexander, for assurances, but had received no response.

Asked on the BBC’s Today show if an equality impact assessment had been carried out, Treasury minister Mark Hoban declined to comment.

Labour leadership contender David Miliband said: ‘This report reveals George Osborne’s Budget was soft on the banks, hard on the poor.’

Shadow Chancellor Alistair Darling said: ‘Nick Clegg is talking nonsense. He might think he can take his party for fools, but the British public can see all too clearly that there’s nothing fair about this Coalition.’

Now there is a lot to be said against the budget even if some bits, like the reform of the benefit system, should be supported because there are too many scroungers living on benefits rather than looking for a job, but this is not the point.

Whatever you think of this coalition the fact is that an unelected and unaccountable quango shouldn’t be allowed to interfere in government policies and tell elected politicians what he/she should or shouldn’t do.

And by the way since when did Trevor Phillips become concerned about the plight of the poor?

The only thing he cares about is turning Britain in a third world hell-hole and use (or better abuse) his power to harass and prosecute any organization which dares stand up for the interests of indigenous Britons.

Maybe George Osborne should follow the suggestion made by Spiked, an online magazine run by far-left Jewish.

In spite of their hatred for the BNP they were outspoken in condemning the legal action taken against us by the EHRC as they saw not only an unacceptable violation of a basic human right but the introduction of fascism by the back door.

“They first come to the ‘racists’” was the warning that politicians in Westminster decided to ignore and now Mr Phillips is coming to them.

What goes around comes around.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Don’t you just love the UAF?

They campaign against the ‘fascist’ and ‘racist’ British National Party (at least that is what they say about us) and repeat the mantra, telling people we are violent skinheads who bring hatred and division between communities, and that we must be stopped by any means possible, but who has just hit the headlines for threatening behaviour, and violent attacks against anyone who disagrees with them and their bully boys tactics?

The UAF of course.

However there is something interesting about the Unwashed Antifa Freaks that has been ignored by MSM.

Their website reports that PCS union leader Mark Serwotka and Drew McConnell of indie band Babyshambles will be speaking in support of UAF officer Martin Smith (style guru), who faces serious charges after the demo against British National Party leader Nick Griffin’s appearance on BBC’s Question Time.

Martin (style guru), who is also national coordinator of Love Music Hate Racism, was arrested at the protest and has been charged with assaulting a police officer. He strenuously denies the charge.

Mark Serwotka and Drew McConnell will be speaking at a protest outside the court. They will be joined by former UCU general secretary Paul Mackney, Zita Holbourne, joint chair, Black Activists Rising Against Cuts (Barac), Rock Against Racism founder Roger Huddle and LMHR supporters The King Blues.

The protest will take place at 9am Tuesday on 7 September at South Western Magistrates Court, 176a Lavender Hill, London SW11 1JU

Apparently the RMT London Fleet 960 branch made a £200 donation to help to cover the cost of this demonstration.

However what nationalists will find quite interesting is that the UAF are lobbying several trade unions to support their right to protest (what they mean by the word protest is anyones guess) by asking them to support the motion below:

This union branch/organisation notes:

1. Martin Smith (style guru), the national coordinator of Love Music Hate Racism and an officer of Unite Against Fascism, faces a serious charge following the demo against British National Party leader Nick Griffin’s appearance on the BBC’s Question Time.

2. Martin (style guru) was arrested on the protest and has been charged with assaulting a police officer. He strenuously denies the charge.

3. Thousands of people joined the UAF demo on 22 October last year against nazi Nick Griffin’s invitation onto the flagship Question Time programme. The demo was backed by trade unions Unite, PCS, CWU, Bectu, Aslef, TSSA, the Musicians Union and the South East Regional TUC.

This union branch/organisation agrees:

1. This case involving a leading antifascist activist could also have implications for other antifascists in future.

2. It is important to stand up for our right to protest.

This union branch/organisation resolves:

1. To support the protest outside Martin’s (style guru) hearing: 9am Tuesday 7 September
South Western Magistrates Court, 176a Lavender Hill, London SW11 1JU

2. To make a donation of …… towards Martin’s (style guru) court costs.

To put this in perspective you should remember that the UAF thugs enjoy protection from the Police, in a normal country they would be left rotting in jail especially when they cowardly target frail old activists who cannot defend themselves.

But no Police force, however PC it is, will ever tolerate any assault on one of their officers and Martin Smith (style guru) will hopefully pay the price for his arrogance and stupidity.

Let’s hope he goes to jail, see if he enjoys the company of black and asian prisoners he loves so much.

In the meantime I would like to know what Darren Rodwell, Labour councillor in Barking & Dagenham and UAF supporter, has to say on this subject, as he claims to be strongly opposed to political violence.

He is more than welcome to post a comment.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Nationalists know only too well that the NUJ diktat states that, the BNP must only be presented in a negative light and if this is not possible then they must be ignored.

But thanks to the internet this soviet-style censorship doesn’t work anymore.

‘Rochdale Online’ reports that Rochdale Euro-MP Chris Davies has emerged at the head of a ‘league table’ comparing the performance of representatives in the European Parliament.

The Liberal Democrat has spoken more often, tabled more questions, and has the best attendance record of the eight MEPs who represent the North West of England.

The figures compiled by independent organisation Votewatch.eu are based on the European Parliament’s own public records since elections were held last year.

Davies has made 34 speeches in the Parliament on subjects ranging from the need to introduce sustainable fisheries policies to the situation in Middle East, but he concentrated in particular on environmental legislation.

However the news that will make nationalists happy is that the second most voluble MEP was British National Party leader Nick Griffin, who spoke 14 times during the year.

Bottom of the table was Conservative MEP Jackie Foster, who spoke on just three occasions and tabled no parliamentary questions at all.

But UKIP’s representative, Paul Nuttall, claimed the record for absenteeism, being present on just 58% of the days that the Parliament was in session.

Chris Davies said that numbers did not tell the whole story but was pleased that he had topped the table.

He said: “I’m involved in the shaping of laws that will be binding on 27 countries. A lot of work goes on behind the scenes but parliamentary debates do provide an opportunity to put ideas on record and to hold the European Commission to public account.

“Perhaps the UK Independence Party should learn some lessons. You can’t stand up for Britain’s interests if you are not present when votes take place.”

Mr Davies is indeed right and it also (not in so many words) says that Nick Griffin is doing a damn good job to stand up for the interests of Britain and the British, in spite of the huge pressure put on him by the establishment.

Let’s hope that Mr Griffin’ hard work will convince more UKIP voters to support the BNP, the only political party determined to get Great Britain out the EU.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The British National Party is setting the agenda of the main political parties.

Evidence of this can be found in The Observer, which printed an article on the benefits of mass immigration.

It is reported in full so that nationalists can better understand the point I am trying to make.

“The government’s proposal to cap highly skilled immigration from outside the EU is taking flak from business leaders. Employers are arguing that the limit will prevent them hiring the staff they need to deliver the growth that the government is banking on to put Britain back on an even keel. According to today’s report from the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development and KPMG, around one in six companies intends to recruit migrant workers in the next several months. There will be serious consequences if they cannot, especially given that almost one in 10 private sector firms is already planning to relocate jobs to India, China and eastern Europe in the next year.

In truth, the cap will restrict only the highly skilled migrants who are most obviously economically valuable. So this is hardly going to assuage public concern about high immigration.

It was public unease, expressed through opinion polls over many years, that led the Conservatives to seize on the cap as a flagship policy for the general election. Labour’s early record on immigration, when numbers were increasing fast, meant the party would get no credit later for putting in place one of the most robust and effective immigration systems in the world, with the points-based system as its centrepiece. The cap was much simpler, a seemingly “tough” policy with real voter appeal. But it has left the new government in a very difficult position: it can please immigration sceptics or economic liberals, but not both. At worst, it will please neither. Quite simply, the immigration cap is a bad policy.

Of course, it is legitimate for the government to take a view on the level of immigration that the UK can manage. People will disagree on whether the objective of “net immigration in the tens, rather than hundreds of thousands” is the right one, but it seems reasonable enough, in principle, for the government to have such an objective. After all, immigration has been very high in the last decade, although it is now falling.

The decrease is probably largely a result of the economic downturn, as well as tighter rules in recent years. Lower net immigration helps to take some of the heat out of a public and political debate that has become polarised and sometimes vicious, stigmatising immigrants and giving succour to the far right.

There are plenty of myths, but little hard evidence that recent immigration has caused significant problems to the UK as a whole. On the contrary, the evidence suggests that immigration has, on balance, brought significant economic and social benefits.

However, where immigration has had negative local impacts, for example by increasing pressure on public services, the consequences have too often been felt by the poorer and more deprived communities. But the government is at risk of confusing symptoms with causes. Reducing immigration will not provide people with secure and well-paid jobs or with affordable housing.

We need to see migration as part of a wider picture of economic change. In an era of globalisation, migration has been an important part of the UK’s economic model. Britain has been happy to see its best companies sold to foreign owners; it can hardly complain when the new proprietors want to bring in some of their own staff.

For many organisations, having international staff is a benefit rather than a reflection of skills shortages. The multinational company bringing a senior executive from its New York office to its HQ in London, the ballet company hiring the newest talent from Cuba, or the academic department recruiting great minds reflect the fact that in many fields the UK has become a global centre of excellence.

We should not forget the contribution that waves of immigrants have made. The commitment of the Ugandan Asians is still apparent across Britain. The US has consistently shown what smart and humane immigration policies can offer in return, economically and socially.”

So far there is nothing new, The Observer is using the same used and abused arguments to convince native Britons that being dispossessed of their land is good for them.

However the real surprise can be found in the second part of the comment.

“In their search for foreign staff, employers may be responding to a skills shortages that reflects underinvestment in education and training. In today’s study, 42% of the employers believe literacy skills of British graduates have fallen in the past five years against only 6% who believe they have gone up. We should be worried if UK employers are having to look overseas to find the skilled staff they need.

The UK is consistently failing to train enough engineers and scientists, for example. In other areas, recruitment difficulties seem more likely to reflect low wages and poor terms and conditions than skills shortages. The fact that there is a shortage of senior care workers tells us more about how we undervalue those essential staff than about the ability of British people to do these jobs.

The challenge for government is not to come up with ever more inventive ways of stopping skilled foreign workers coming to the UK, but to address the underlying reasons that mean we need them. Of course, in such fiscally straitened times, this may be easier said than done if the answers are higher wages in the public sector and more investment in education.

The suspicion that some employers are resorting to recruiting immigrant labour to avoid the costs of training British staff, or actively using migrant labour as a way to keep wages down, should be focusing the government’s attention on employment regulation and employers’ obligations to their staff and the wider community. Public concern about immigration would be better addressed by rigorous enforcement of minimum-wage legislation than by caps or limits on skilled migration. Where employers are failing to provide apprenticeships or training for staff, the government needs to encourage them to take responsibility for the training their future workforce. Restricting their access to foreign staff might induce them to do this, but it seems a curiously roundabout way of tackling the problem.

With the introduction of the cap the government is showing an uncharacteristic enthusiasm for intervening in the workings of the free market and is picking a fight with business in the process. The outcome would be better if some of that enthusiasm were directed at the root causes of economic insecurity. And if that requires picking a different fight with business, at least the immigration cap has provided the government with some practice.”

So even the anti-British, anti-whites marxists writing for a far-left paper like The Observer admit that government should address the shortage of qualified people by training native Britons instead of allowing more immigrants.

Of course they are very careful to avoid of being seen as racist (perish the thought) but if you read between the lines they clearly echo the point we have been making for years, namely that companies prefer to hire cheaper and qualified immigrants rather than training native Britons and that the education system is failing to produce qualified people.

Unsurprisingly they are still campaigning for more immigration, but even for The Observer it is becoming more difficult to dismiss as racist our policies.

This is a great achievement for nationalists, who would have believed only a few months ago that such a rag could urge government to put more emphasis on training native workforce?

Further evidence, if needed, that the BNP has never been so powerful even though we have no MPs.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I am sure it will be fresh in the memory of Nationalists how, during the European elections, MSM ran a massive smear campaign against the British National Party in order to deter voters from supporting us.

What was really upsetting were the number of lies printed attacking us.

Journalists knew it was illegal but they deliberately chose to breach the law because they knew we that we didn’t have the resources to start legal action and the libel law covers individuals and not political parties.

One of the nastiest newspapers was the Manchester Evening News (MEN), at that time part of the Guardian Media Group (it’s now owned by the Trinity Mirror Group).

Its chief editor never concealed his hatred for us, and he admitted quite openly that any means was legitimate to stop us.

The good news (indeed) is that MEN’ journalists are now having an hard time because apparently, their new employer is keen to maximise profits.

Below is a comment from by Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette 2nd August, that describes the feeling of frustration among MEN’ journalists.

As the profits pile in from MEN Media, why indeed is Trinity Mirror cutting yet more jobs?

Trinity Mirror paid Guardian Media Group £7.4m for its regional newspapers business on 28 March. As of 4 July Trinity had already made £2.7m profit on turnover of £18.2m out of the Manchester Evening News and some 33 weekly titles. By the end of the financial year Trinity Mirror will probably have made the entire purchase price back.

No wonder National Union of Journalists members at the Manchester Evening News are ‘baffled’ that Trinity Mirror is planning to make ten of them redundant.
Especially considering the fact that when Trinity Mirror bought the MEN it promised that there was “no redundancy programme planned”.

In Trinity’s interim results it notes that the purchase of GMG Regional Media has been “highly successful” delivering “strong revenue and profit performance”.
If anything the company seems pleasantly surprised by how well the new division has done. So why the need for the unplanned-for redundancy programme?

Trinity is already saving a shed-load of money by moving MEN Media staff from their smart city-centre offices in Manchester to vacant space in a printworks in Chadderton, Oldham, which it already owns. Just last year some 78 editorial jobs were cut at MEN Media as it closed all the weekly newspaper offices.

It does seem short-sighted to make a new wave cutbacks just as the business is getting on its feet again, by further integrating the weekly and daily newspaper editorial teams.

Here’s what the MEN Media NUJ chapel said on Friday:

“Today’s statement showing encouraging interim results from Trinity Mirror and including an acknowledgement of the great financial contribution already being made by the recently-acquired MEN Media, leaves us even more baffled and angry that we are currently in the process of shedding up to 10 more journalists’ jobs on top of the 78 axed last year.

“Over the past few years, journalists at the Manchester Evening News and weekly newspapers have seen that when business is good, management cuts our jobs, when business is bad, management cuts our jobs and then business is improving, management cuts our jobs. Different management, same philosophy.”
The reason for the latest cutbacks lies, I suspect, with the need to hit group-wide cost reduction targets, of £25m for the year to help pay down overall debt which currently stands at £308.4m.

Trinity Mirror is to be congratulated for turning the financial performance around so quickly, and to a certain extent can’t be blamed for the economic realities of being a big Plc which has funded what it sees as necessary expansion through taking on debt.

But given GMG and the Scott Trust’s long association with Manchester, and its constitutional commitment to supporting journalism, might it have sought an exit from its regionals business which would have better served its old home-town?

There must have been any number of of wealthy individuals, or companies, with strong local links to Manchester who would have been delighted with the sort of return Trinity Mirror is now enjoying from its new regionals business, been proud to own such an esteemed set of media titles and not felt the same pressure to cut costs.

Nice to see those useless, unwashed, spoiled marxists feeling the pain, and this is made more enjoyable by the level of their stupidity.

Nationalists will have noticed how, someone who claim to be anti-capitalist and for social justice, is asking the help of the greedy capitalists that they claim to hate so much.

Why someone would be proud to own these newspapers is quite beyond me, they are not worth the paper they are printed on and the fact that businesspeople around Manchester refused to waste money advertising in them speaks for itself.

Usually journalists tend to oppose any plan from individuals or companies to buy their newspaper as they fear the new owner could undermine their independence but apparently those useless marxists care only about their fat salaries.

Those journalists deserve everything they get, not just because they have contempt for anyone against mass immigration and diversity.

They think it’s right for BNP activists to be assaulted by UAF thugs and they refuse to report in an unbiased way every crime committed by blacks and asians against native British.

Let’s hope all of them are soon to be unemployed and pay the price of their own arrogance.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

In the last few days a lot of rumours have been circulating about the financial problems of the British National Party and some are claiming that the BNP is bankrupt.

Anyone with a little of common sense knows that all the other parties have the same problem, but the MSM prefer to ignore them and concentrate on the BNP.

The Independent on Sunday reports that the Liberal Democrats, after they had to stomach a coalition deal with the Tories are now forcing members to swallow a 15 per cent rise in membership fees to raise £100,000 for an electoral fightback.

The party’s federal executive warns that entering government has triggered “new financial challenges”. A senior party source said failure to retain the “Short” money paid to opposition parties was a “major cock-up” of the coalition negotiations. “The party faces considerable financial difficulties in the coming year unless it attracts one or two major donors,” the source added.

Some 20 staff were laid off from the party’s HQ after the election, while an emergency conference to rubber-stamp the coalition deal cost more than £100,000. With polls showing a major slump in Lib Dem support, officials fear a bloodbath at elections to the Welsh Assembly, Scottish Parliament and local councils next May.

Under the fundraising plan, the recommended annual subscription will hit £60 – up from £52.

Electoral Commission figures show the Lib Dems received £6.4m in 2009 but spent £6.6m. Their Tory partners spent £37.1m.

It would be interesting to find out how a party like the Lib Dems with so many rich supporters finds itself in financial difficulty.

Any hint of financial irregularities?

Even if there are some, the Electoral Commission will close both eyes, because after all only the BNP must be put under the microscope.

It’s curious that membership of the Lib-Dem is double that of the BNP.

Maybe it’s because of their reputation as an adolescent-lovers party, after all if you can afford to pay a rent-boy you can surely pay a hefty membership fee.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Only a few months ago the British National Party was alone in exposing the grooming of white British children for sex by Asian (Muslim) gangs.

Not only have we been accused of inciting racial hatred but our Chairman Nick Griffin was arrested and prosecuted twice when he talked about this problem for the first time.

It’s a sign that our hard work is yielding results. The Independent on Sunday (IoS) printed an article ( below) about this topic.

Posing for her first school photograph, Joanne was like any other girl at the age of five. She loved drawing and painting, and her favourite game was to play hide-and-seek in the woods near her home in Leeds with her five siblings. As she grew, Joanne liked to hang around, chatting and laughing with friends. But soon after she turned 12, while out playing, she met a gang of men who were to become her pimps. They took advantage of her freedom, gained her trust and prepared to abuse her.

In the beginning, the men who befriended her had seemed nice enough: they showered her with compliments, bought her a phone, and one of them – a 42-year-old married man – became her “boyfriend”. Within a year, she was forced into prostitution.

By the time she was 16, Joanne would disappear from the family home for weeks at a time. She was transported between Manchester, Rochdale, Bradford and countless other towns, locked into rooms and made to have sex repeatedly with men for money – not that she saw any of it.

Joanne is only one of many young women who have been subjected to such horrific ordeals across the UK. She is the victim of sex trafficking with a twist: not women brought in illegally from abroad and forced into prostitution, but British born. Targeted on estates throughout the country, they are passed from gang to gang, and work from town to town.

Yet the information on the trafficking of young people for sex within Britain is so scant that experts say the first official figures confirming the trade – seen by The Independent on Sunday – are just “the very, very tip of the iceberg”. Figures from the UK Human Trafficking Centre for April 2009 to March 2010 show only 38 Britons were registered as victims. This comes after a snapshot survey by the children’s charity Barnardo’s revealed it worked with 609 sexually exploited children last year, of whom 90 appeared to have been trafficked within the UK.

The victims, unlike women coerced or tricked into coming into the UK from overseas, frequently have family and friends who are reduced to despair by what is happening. Joanne’s mother, Christine, who was bringing up six children on her own, tried to protect her daughter, but the situation quickly spiralled out of her control.

“More than once I locked her in. She nearly broke her neck jumping out of upstairs windows,” she recalls. Joanne fought her mother to get out of the house, giving her a black eye.

Before long, what had been flattery turned into violence. Joanne was called on the phone she had been given and was forced to leave the house at all hours to have sex with men. If she didn’t do what was wanted. they threatened to hurt her and her family. “They brainwash these girls,” her mother says. “A friend said to me ‘it’s like she’d been hypnotised’. That phone triggered something, and she’d got to respond.”

Her mother says her pleas to police and social services fell on deaf ears. “I used to say: ‘When are you going to do something?’ They’d say they couldn’t do anything unless she complains, but when do you decide that a child has to complain? They said they could do nothing. She was 13. I’d take down the number plates of cars as they drove away, but the police wouldn’t accept them.”

The IoS is withholding certain details of the identity of the mother and daughter to protect the family.

Campaigners say most victims are aged between 12 and 16, groomed by men to provide sex. Young men and women are typically targeted by one person, who wins their trust before pimping them to others and forcibly transporting them around Britain.

The case in court last month of a 14-year-old girl who disappeared from her home in Manchester after she was offered drugs and alcohol to groom her for sex is typical of the abuse experienced by these victims. Nine men were convicted of sexual crimes – though not for trafficking – and each was sentenced to jail terms ranging from eight months to seven years.

There has still not been one prosecution for trafficking Britons within the UK. And, despite mounting evidence of the scourge, a police report into trafficking to be released this week, called Project Acumen, chose not to assess the scale of trafficking of British nationals. Of the British women they did interview, they decided none exhibited “the dimensions of the trafficking definition”.

Chief Superintendent Tony Blockley, head of crime at Derbyshire constabulary, tells a different story. He says: “We’ve always thought of this as a problem that comes from overseas, whereas this is actually happening on our doorsteps. The scale of it is enormous; Derby isn’t a hotbed of this – it’s just one town that’s decided to look at this as a problem.

“This is a new area of policing for us. As soon as you lift the stone up, you start to find things, but people weren’t lifting up the stone before. These are the kids that slip under the radar. Victims come from chaotic backgrounds; they are often in children’s homes. As they get more involved in the network, the grooming lessens and the abuse increases.”

After a year of being abused, Joanne started to lash out. “Virtually overnight she became someone we couldn’t even recognise,” says Christine. “Her attitude changed and she started to get really distant. After a while she got violent towards her siblings and me.”

Social services said she could no longer live in the same place and put her into foster care. The downward spiral accelerated. At 16, Joanne had been missing for seven weeks. “I took social services to court as they said they didn’t have a duty of care,” says Christine. “The judge said they did, and the next day she was found, locked in a house with an Asian man, with the door handle taken off.”

The gang that subjected her to this ordeal was Asian. The issue of alleged grooming of white teenage girls by Asian gangs is highly contentious. When the former Labour MP Ann Cryer said that Asian men were targeting white girls, she was accused of racism. With scant research available, there is no evidence that perpetrators or victims predominate from any one race.

Joanne, because she is now 18, is no longer of any interest to her former pimp, says her mother. The teenager is mentally scarred, homeless and drug addicted. “She’s not a child any more, so they’re not interested. They’ve used her up and thrown her out. One of them said to her: ‘In five years’ time you’ll be a crackhead out on the street and I’ll be cruising with another 14-year-old.’ Five years down the line, she is on drugs, on the streets. He – like he told her – is cruising with another 14-year-old.”

Sheila Taylor, chair of the National Working Group for Sexually Exploited Children and Young People, said: “What we’re seeing is the tip of the iceberg. This is happening in all cities and many towns. There has been no prosecution of those who sexually exploit children with trafficking legislation.”

Like many parents of victims, Christine is frustrated that the issue has continued to be ignored. “They’ve known about this happening on my estate for a long time. It’s not being dealt with because it’s such a big issue. If you acknowledge that it goes on you have to do something and they probably think they wouldn’t be able to cope with the sheer numbers.”

Nationalists will have noticed how the IoS did its best to minimise the fact that the people involved in this evil crime are mainly Asian Muslims that shouldn’t be in the country in the first place.

Unfortunately this fact is becoming more and more difficult to deny also for the unwashed leftist of the IoS.

Indeed they are caught between a rock and an hard place.

On the one hand reporting, this story is at odds with their promotion of diversity and multiculturalism but, on the other hand, ignoring it can only boost our support as people can clearly see that we are the only party willing to talk abort this problem.

And who could have believed only a few months ago that a newspaper like the IoS would report a story like that?

Very few, if any.

This is another victory for the BNP, even though we failed to get an MP elected it has never been so influential.

No wonder they are trying to bankrupt and destroy us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Although government vehemently denies it, we all know that tens of billions of Pounds are wasted every year on immigrants and asylum seekers.

The British National Party has been accused of inciting racial hatred whenever we try to expose the true cost of immigration, but hiding the truth is becoming more difficult for them.

They may like to explain why the £115,000 a week spent on translators helping immigrants claim benefits in Britain. is facing intense scrutiny.

The Government wants to cut the cost of interpreters which last year soared to more than £6 million, a 50 per cent rise.

In the last six years 169,000 immigrants claimed unemployment benefit within six months of getting a National Insurance number.

The benefits alone cost taxpayers £1.4million a week but added to that is the translation bill. Most of it came from providing face-to-face and telephone translation services for people whose grasp of English was not good enough to understand the benefits system.

Employment Minister Chris Grayling said: “It’s been quite clear to us that costs ran out of control under the last Government. We aim to bring the costs down as far as we possibly can. We’ve been very clear that people coming to live and work in the UK need to be able to speak English.”

In 2004, Labour Employment ­Minister Jim Murphy pledged that costs would be curbed but the annual bill has more than doubled from the £2.63 million then.

A spokesman for the TaxPayers’ ­Alliance said: “With translation costs on the rise it’s more important than ever that the government insist newcomers learn English. Negative attitudes towards immigration are fuelled by these sorts of overheads. The cost of document translation has increasingly started to look like a very expensive exercise in politically correct PR”.

Just a question: why bring the costs down instead of stopping the money spent on interpreters altogether?

It is bad enough that people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place are getting unemployment benefit (and this is just one of many benefits) so spending money on interpreters so they can learn how to scrounge more money out of us is clearly unacceptable.

So far according to this article we pay about £80m a year for 169,000 parasites and the cost is clearly higher because it doesn’t include other benefits.

It would make people bloody angry even in good times, in these less than good times they are absolutely fuming.

On the other hand stories like this are useful in waking up people, and to convince them that the only party which will stop this madness is the British National Party.

No wonder the establishment is doing its best to bankrupt and destroy us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The MSM are still at it, busy spreading lies to create divisions and splits inside the British National Party. Nationalists will be delighted to know that the circulation of every national newspaper suffered a year-on-year decline in July, with quality titles faring worse than tabloid and mid-markets papers.

Seven papers suffered from double-digit year-on year falls in circulation last month, according to the latest ABC print circulation figures.

The decline was most keenly felt at Guardian News & Media’s The Observer, which dropped 21.02 per cent to an average weekly circulation of 314,602 in July.

The extent of the decline amongst the qualities has been exaggerated by the fact they have been stripping out free bulk sales and overseas copies from their circulations.

The Daily Star may have recorded a year-on-year circulation fall of 4.95 per cent but its average daily sale of 843,229 was up 4.1 per cent month-on-month suggesting Richard Desmond’s decision to slash cover price by 50 per cent to just ten pence from early last month is already reaping a reward.

The Daily Star’s sister title, The Daily Star Sunday, benefited from a circulation jump of 5.07 per cent month-on-month to a weekly average of 370,032 in July.

Daily Mirror 1,242,446 (-7.28%)

Daily Record 324,229 (-5.52%)

Daily Star 843,229 (-4.95%)

The Sun 3,042,406 (-2.53%)

Daily Express 663,871 (-9.56%)

Daily Mail 2,117,839 (-2.79%)

Daily Telegraph 678,391 (-17.16%)

Financial Times 378,497 (-4.80%)

The Guardian 277,246 (-15.67%)

The Independent 183,975 (-2.67%)

The Scotsman 42,850 (-7.20%)

The Times 502,588 (-13.42%)

Daily Star Sunday 370,032 (-10.74%)

News of the World 2,890,523 (-6.88%)

Sunday Mail 388,954 (-7.19%)

Sunday Mirror 1,155,101 (-7.49%)

The People 539,692 (-9.26%)

Sunday Express 568,740 (-11.87%)

Sunday Post 325,580 (-7.96%)

The Mail on Sunday 1,954,616 (-4.23%)

Independent on Sunday 155,565 (-3.01%)

The Observer 314,602 (-21.02%)

Sunday Herald 40,069 (-1.08%)

The Sunday Telegraph 505,214 (-16.15%)

The Sunday Times 1,068,158 (-10.31%)

We have said it before, people are slowly realising that newspapers don’t print news but marxist propaganda.

This fall in circulation may not cause the closure of any of them but it will surely lead to more layoffs of useless journalists, and hopefully more financial trouble for the NUJ as fewer of them will have a job .

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

While antifascists are spreading lies about the British National Party in order to demoralise BNP activists, our hardworking officers are busy creating links with nationalist parties all over the world.
Photo courtesy of Bertie… sorry Bert:(

A few weeks ago we reported that Nick Griffin was appointed Vice-President of the Alliance of European National Movements, a new pan-European nationalist party.

Well, nationalists will no doubt be delighted to hear that in the next few days nationalist parties from all over the world will hold their first ever conference in Japan with the intention of building a worldwide alliance between them.

The dream of all nationalists is coming true, this is an article in the Daily Telegraph about the conference.

The three-day gathering, which is the first of its kind, is being organised by Issuikai, a Right-wing Japanese party which disputes the extent of the Nanjing massacre in China.

At least 100 representatives of far-right parties – including the BNP – from eight countries, are expected to attend the conference in Tokyo which will include a tour of the controversial Yasukuni Shrine to more than 1,000 Second World War criminals.

Jean-Marie Le Pen, the leader of France’s National Front, is due to make a key-note speech at the conference on Friday.

It comes as fears over the growing popularity of European Right-wing groups increase following gains in national elections and the European Election of last year.

The Alliance of European National Movements, the coalition of Europe’s Far-Right parties is sending 20 delegates to the Future of Nationalist Movements conference.

Bruno Gollnisch MEP, the vice-president of France’s Front National, is expected to attend along with members of Hungary’s Jobbik party, which recently won 17 per cent in the country’s general election, Vlaams Belang from Belgium, Portugal’s Partido Nacional, and Italy’s Fiamma Tricolore.

Adam Walker, a high-ranking member of the BNP who was accused of calling immigrants “savage animals” when he worked as a teacher, is representing the British National Party.

Issuikai is covering the delegates’ accommodation, local transport, and food costs but those attending are to fund their own return flights to Japan, which often cost up to £1,000.

MEPs are entitled to a personal travel allowance outside their member country of up to 4,000 euros a year and many are thought to be using some of the money to fly to the conference.

Timothy Kirkhope MEP, Leader of the Conservatives in the bloc called for the European Parliament’s auditors to investigate.

Matthew Elliot, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: “This is yet another example of MEPs abusing expenses. It would be a disgrace for British taxpayers’ money to be used to fund MEP’s travel to a conference which is in part organised by a group that denies war crimes such as the Nanjing Massacre.

“Any money MEPs receive should be subject to more scrutiny and they should be more accountable to those who pay their salaries and expenses, they should not have free rein to use taxpayers’ money to propagate abhorrent views like those of Issuikai.”

Unsurprisingly the article is quite negative and full of lies.

Anyone who is familiar with Japanese politics will confirm that is not unusual for Japanese Prime Ministers to pay a visit to Yasukuni Shrine and that Issuikai’ views are shared by politicians from the main parties.

Indeed the Japanese attitude to its past is a sore point in international relations, South Korea and China regularly complain that Japanese politicians still refuse to accept responsibility for atrocities committed in the past.

And by the way how can the Daily Telegraph claim to hold the moral high ground in judging us when it condones the murder of several thousand Muslims in the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan?

We know the answer, don’t we?

As for Adam Walker going to Japan this is not really surprising.

Not only Mr Walker is married to a Japanese girl but he has lived in Japan and has first hand experience of what it means to live in a country which puts the interests of its own people first.

As a former teacher Mr Walker was amazed by the efficiency of their education system, where schools are staffed with qualified teachers who are there to teach and not to indoctrinate, where exams are tough in order to make sure only the best can pass and where strict discipline and corporal punishment force unruly students to behave.

Whatever the outcome of this conference, the fact that such a gathering is taking place is a positive sign that the battle to stop the new world order has already begun and luckily we can stop this globalist plan before it’s too late.

* Here there is a link to learn more about Issuikai:

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20030520b2.html

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

ed: Adam Walker pic courtesy of BertieBert. Sorry Bert:(

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We Nationalists have always been of the mind that if you are white and British ( I am Italian but you get the gist of the matter) you are at the back of the queue.

The British National Party has been saying this for years and we have been accused of creating divisions between ‘communities’ for saying it.

So it is amusing to note that Channel 4 has been accused by a Tory MP of under-representing white people and being obsessed with over representing ethnic minorities.

The broadcaster has come under fire because of a series of diversity schemes it has run discriminating against whites.

Conservative MP Philip Davies attacked the Political Correctness at the company saying it should employ people on merit.

The broadcaster’s chairman, Lord Burns, and its chief executive, David Abraham, appeared before MPs sitting on the Culture, Media and Sport committee, to answer questions on Channel 4′s recently-released annual report.

At the session Mr Davies said schemes like a recent bursary for African, Caribbean, Bangladeshi and Pakistani students, were effectively depriving white people of the same equal opportunities.

He asked why, given that Channel 4 already had 12 per cent of its staff from an ethnic minority background, as compared with eight per cent of the general public, it needed special programmes like these.

When Channel 4 explained the staffing figures as being down the fact it is based in the capital, Davies told bosses: ‘You’re not a London broadcaster, you are a national broadcaster.’

He told Channel 4 chiefs: ‘It seems to me that among your figures the people who are under-represented at Channel 4 are white people not ethnic minorities.

‘It seems a bit bizarre that an organisation that is over-reprensentative of ethnic minorities should be trying to do more of these things.’
He added: ‘What about white people are you not interested in employing white people?’

But Channel 4′s chief executive said the broadcaster was part of an industry seeking to redress a general level of under-representation.

The chairman admitted that low diversity levels were particularly pronounced in the more senior roles in the industry, adding that the broadcaster was in no way obsessed with the issue.

This came as Channel 4 bosses defended accusations over ‘grotesque’ sums paid to top executives.

Labour MP Jim Sheridan described some money paid to executives as ‘quite breathtaking’.

Mr Sheridan also referred to the £785,000 total remuneration for 2009 received by director of television Kevin Lygo, who in April was appointed managing director of ITV Studios, and the £513,000 total paid to sales director Andy Barnes.

Mr Sheridan questioned why someone was worth the figures and added: “That’s grotesque.’

Former Treasury permanent secretary Lord Burns defend the pay packets. He said: ‘We are in very, very strong competition with ITV, with other commercial channels.’

The remuneration of recently-departed chief executive Andy Duncan, which stood at £1.48 million in 2009, including £514,000 in salary and fees and £731,000 in payments in lieu of notice was highlighted at the hearing.

Asked by committee chairman John Whittingdale why Mr Duncan was given the payments in lieu of notice, Lord Burns said: “He received his contractual entitlements and no more …’

A Channel 4 spokesman said: ‘Channel 4 is a broadcaster with a longstanding commitment to diversity and we aim to reflect the rich and diverse mix of cultures in Britain today both on screen and in our workforce. We embrace diversity in its broadest sense; including ethnic minority groups, gays and lesbians, people with disabilities and those from different social backgrounds.’

I think this spokesman fails to understand that many native Britons never wanted enrichment in the first place but, like the many Marxists that now run this country, he feels entitled to use his position to demonise anyone who dares to stand up for the interests of indigenous Britons.

Nonetheless, the fact that Mr Davies questioned the anti-white bias of Channel 4 is a positive development, only a year ago it would have been an unthinkable question to ask.

Clearly the presence of the BNP makes it more difficult for politicians in Westminster to ignore these topics as they know we receive support from the white people who believe they are being treated unfairly and despite the smear campaigns they are not going to change their minds.

This is another example of how the British National Party, even though it failed to get an MP elected, is making its presence felt inside the corridors of power.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Barking & Dagenham council is in dire financial straits.

The 51 Labour councillors need to save £42m over the next four years, council workers are already starting to bear the brunt as salaries are now frozen, overtime payments suspended, and by the end of the year 150 of them will be thrown out of work.

But, the council still manages to find the money to spend over £3m on salaries for 31 council chiefs.

Corporate and Divisional Directors are paid in excess of £100,000 a year each, with Heads of Services slightly behind on up to £93,000 annually.

Acting chief executive, David Woods takes home £145,000 a year excluding expenses.

Corporate Directors like Darren Henaghan (Customer Services) and Helen Jenner (Children Services) are the next highest paid, earning up to £132,000 annually.

Divisional Directors such as Nina Clark (Legal & Democratic Services) and Chris Pelham (Safeguarding & Rights) are paid a salary of £110,000 – £116,000.

In total up to £3,245,000 is spent on the wages of 31 people each year.

Before he left the council former boss Bob Whiteman took home a £189,000 pay packet.

To be fair, compared to other councils in London, the amount of money spent on B&D high level civil servants is not outrageous .
Newham borough council chief Joe Duckworth earned £241,000 last year, and Tower Hamlets a few weeks ago attracted a lot of criticism when it emerged that its top earning officials took home £18m between them last year.

So when a council needs to make big savings, targeting the salary of the highest paid civil servants should be the priority and that is why the British National Party wanted to peg civil servant’ salaries to £60,000.

Had this measure been implemented the council would have saved £1,385,000, enough to save maybe 40 council jobs.

Unfortunately voters believed the lies spread by antifascist groups that if the BNP gained control of the council many would have lost their jobs.

The truth is that not only they are going to lose their jobs anyway but the scale of those losses will be bigger as Labour will never tackle wasteful expenditure.

How much money is wasted on politically correct projects?

One of these is the Race Equality Project, manufactured to ‘fight discrimination and promote community cohesion’.

I can reveal that Barking & Dagenham for the year 2010/2011 will give £62,600 to an organization called Harmony House.

Interesting to note that the year before it only received £31,300.

It appears to me, now that the BNP has been swept out of the council, Labour feels it is entitled to increase funding to HH by 100%, since with no opposition they need not explain to anyone why they have done it.

Sooner or later there will be cuts in essential services and voters will find out that under Labour things can only get worse not better, and when push comes to shove they will realise they have been conned, they will see what they have voted for, and put the BNP where it truly belongs…. In control of B&D!!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

From Simon Darby blog

I don’t know about you but my Romanian is somewhat shaky. Nevertheless not to be intimidated I’m providing an article for you from the latest edition of “Informatia Zilei”: (machine translation somewhat lacking in the syntax and grammar area, but you will get the point) ed.

BNP accuses the EU freedom of movement for “the wave of crimes” of the Romanian Gypsies in M. Kingdom
Written by Max Mioara, August 2, 2010

EU rules on free movement allow citizens to have total freedom of movement within Member States, finds British National Party in a statement entitled “EU rules on free movement caused ‘crime wave’ of the Romanian Gypsies in M. Kingdom”
“Almost immediately” after the EU accession, Romanian police has been requested by the British authorities
to investigate a series of criminal gangs because of a wave of crime “from Roma to Britain, says the party BNP (British National Party), considered an extreme-right party, present since last year in Parliament. Party, which was awarded a nationalist-fascist ideology, and is led by Nick Griffin has never managed to enter the British Parliament.
Roma crime massive scale was realized after a newspaper published information about a gang of Romanian Gypsies who have trafficked to Britain over 200 children to beg, steal and commit petty crimes, says BNP.
Romanian Gypsies – which draws attention to BNP, not to be confused with real Romanian, who are law-abiding Europeans – are part of an Indian tribe that has entered Eastern Europe long ago.
Romanian citizens are allowed to come to Britain from January 1, 2007, recalls the BNP. In the first six months of the year, police statistics showed that “Romanian citizens” are responsible for 1,080 cases of crime. During the same period of 2006, had recorded only 135 such cases. Incredibly, Romanian authorities reported that crime rates fell to their country, because gypsies have export activities in M. Kingdom, underlines BNP.
BNP Press cites a statement by Stan Bîtlan, Ialomita police chief, who said that “there is a connection between what happens here (in Romania – No) and the UK. No matter what they in the UK, appears here in Romania, as luxury cars and houses, “the Romanian official said.
Tandarei mayor, where he held the latest police operation, said in 2007 that there was a decrease in crime in his city, showing BNP.
A secret document from the Interior Ministry press arrived in 2007 estimated that 45,000 potential criminals from Romania and Bulgaria have arrived in Britain, British nationalists recall, on Tuesday.
In the latest incident, 26 gypsies were arrested in connection with gangs Tandarei trafficked children. Prisoners risk being charged with child trafficking, money laundering, criminal association with a group organized and illegal possession of weapons. Children were under the control of a gang member in the UK and were used to “earn money” by begging, washing windshields, thefts from pockets and shops, exemplified in the closing communique BNP.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Black Country Patriot BC1959

As memories of the Blair Project seem to flutter away in the breeze for most people, moments of anger and disappointment that flecked his ugly disgraceful premiership are once again part of our every day lives, why? Because the politically engineered Con-Dem (Brokeback) Coalition, arranged so subtly with help from the controlled media before the elections last May, has made even the most apolitical Briton somewhat concerned about the blue print for white British ethnic cleansing just as obvious this time as the last.

Once the British National Party has gone through it’s latest stage of development, leading to a certain maturity after obviously state sponsored attacks from within, and some folk being taken in by some of the oldest tricks in the Communist Political Subversion Handbook, we will literally be the only opposition party left in British politics, and they know it.

So then, Cameron, backed by his genetically modified Liberal partners, and the Biggest Trade Delegation in history, (TV media spin), have been doing deals behind the backs of not only his own traditional Conservative supporters, but the whole of the next generation of British school leavers, including Post Graduates, who are now working behind bars, stacking shelves, or living off friends and relatives whilst facing massive debts. The reality of all this of course is the fact, openly stated by the media that the Indian government has put pressure on Britain to be more flexible in it’s immigration policies.

By flexible, they mean an open door policy. Not only that but with Turkey now being encouraged to enter the near bankrupt Euro-Zone, we will see some 750,000 extra immigrants at least, from that country alone. With some 5000,000. illegals here already, and another 10,000,000 settled here in the last fifty years or so, the true number of non-white British Citizens, could actually be a frightening One Third of the population of the estimated 75,000,000 future populace, considering their phenomenally high birth rates.
Here’s what Migration Watch has to say: There was relatively little migration into Britain (other than from Ireland) until New Commonwealth immigration began in the 1950s. Legislation in the early 1970s was intended to reduce this to a trickle. In practice it continued at the rate of half a million acceptances for settlement every decade. This was counterbalanced by emigration until 1983. The net inflow has grown steadily since then. The total net immigration from outside the E.U. has now reached a rate equivalent to about 1.5 million every decade.

With recent revelations about New Labour’s ”Brave New Britain” coming to light, where even the media proved its limited national worth, and exposed papers suggesting that the Blair project had used immigration to smash the right in Britain, and change the country for ever, it was hoped that Cameron would at least honour some Conservative policies. In April this year, one month before the elections, Cameron told the Mail: Immigration is ‘too high’ and will be reduced to levels last seen in the mid-1990s under a Tory election blueprint to restore Britain’s ‘sense of national purpose. Reducing levels to those of the 1990s would mean around 50,000 immigrants a year would be allowed to settle.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxxU9XaX

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1265515/Conservatives-pledge-cut-number-migrants.html#ixzz0uxrOx69d

Please remember that the figures here are simply block numbers, referenced from media and other sources, to show some reality of the then, now, and future outlook for Britain. Immigrants are well known for their love of the ‘Benefits Riviera Of The World’, ie Britain, and thus, any numbers suggested could explode beyond those shown here. Simply put, we are in for a very serious economic, social, and lawless five years. God help the children.

Now Mr Cameron, are you going to take your name off the UAF supporter list? Is Blair, Brown, and in fact anyone in politics still alive when they introduced Globalism into our nation in 1948, going to take responsibility for not only what has already happened to us, but what is happening, and the BLOODY consequences that will without a shadow of a doubt, come to fruition?

All Prime Ministers and every member of this, and all previous governments, their financial contributors, horse whispering foreign advisers, and the increasingly arrogant and aggressive immigrants given opportunities our grand parents could not have imagined, will have to face the wrath of the descendants of the Ancient Briton. This is not a vague threat, or a piece written in righteous anger. It is quite simply, A Promise To Pay The Bearer so to speak. Ironically, that was what we were, as a nation, promised in 1833, when bank notes were made legal tender for all sums above £5 in England and Wales. Thus, in the event of a crisis, the British people would still be able to accept such Bank notes, and its bullion reserves would be safeguarded.

Where are our reserves Mr Cameron? Where is our national, and socio-economic security? Can you tell us Mr Cameron, why you and your shadowy masters and advisers, have now decided to completely destroy this nation? Most people think the answer is obvious… you dare not, and you could not. You have gone abroad, and blatantly reneged on every promise you made, and helped push the Blair Project further. You are a parasite, a traitor, and an enemy of the people Mr Cameron. You are in fact, the absolute proof that in this, and other Western European nations, that we are at the mercy of a multi-headed Marxist Occupied Government (MOG), in the worst economic crisis to hit the world in Eighty Years, yet you are now going to import millions more immigrants into our nation yet again, under the illusion of economic necessity. You are going to enslave us to low wages, and at the same time help the Blair Project along nicely, by robbing our manufacturing and skills base and taking our inheritance from us without a sleepless night.

Readers, imagine this continuating if you will. Think hard and long about your own circumstances. If we have five full years of this coalition, and yet another rump of immigrants arrive on our shores, what will this government do to placate them, and to halt opposition to such ethnic cleansing? That’s right, they will outlaw ALL opposition, and extend the powers of the alien lawmakers that have infested our legal institutions. Add to this the much vaunted benefit system overhaul, which will be used to take more away from our own, and give extra help, homes, jobs and businesses, such as the much needed car washing franchises seen by the thousand around this country of ours. Skilled jobs are already taken by immigrants as it is, so why is it that India, China, and Pakistan amongst others, are so willing to let go of their own skilled workers, nurses, and car wash experts?

Traitor and political rent boy, Tony Blair, who now ponces around the globe making millions and pretending to care about the third world, did not leave the once much loved, and most famous address in history No 10 Downing Street. He simply underwent genetic modification by his political surgeons, changed his name, and we now have a new face for the Blair Project. Do you recognise him Dave? It’s you, yes you. We will remember you, and every single one of the traitors, war-mongers, bullion thieves, and those responsible for aiding and abetting the rape, murder, and ethnic cleansing of our last two generations of white British people. When the men in suits come knocking on our doors Mr Cameron, that is when the real revolution will begin… the Nationalist Revolution.

By BC1959

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Not related to London but relevant to the BNP nationally.

Wigan Patriot

Last Chance Saloon…………….For Some!
It’s now or definitely never…….if the establishment are ever going to succeed in bringing down the British National Party………… and this for good.

With all their mighty clout, the endless pot of monetary contributions from both internal and external bodies of Westminster, the government quangos, the media magnates and the usual frothing lunatic ‘leftard’ unions, British hating Commies, Marxist cranks, infiltrators, druggies, spongers, soap dodging freaks and it certainly goes much further and beyond when you add the name of PM David Cameron to the list of the deviant on the fascist left, who have all tried and failed to put a stop to the British National Party march.

Two MEP’s, London Assembly member, County Councillors and a plethora of dedicated local Councillors and many a stalwart branch and group up and down this great nation of ours dedicated to our cause, who all continue to shine.

And this fantastic bond continues to grow and grow at an absolutely fantastic rate in support of the British National Party, the last bastion of hope for our sorry browbeaten. Just look at Facebook for example – this just proves the rate at which we are expanding. I remember seeing the first few hundred “Like This” members of the British National Party coming though via the Facebook facility and willing for more….If you look now I bet we’re touching on the 40,000 mark or maybe we’ve already passed the 40,000 “members” by the time you’ve read this!

Locally we took over 10,000 votes just in the Wigan and Leigh district alone at the last local and general elections! We were the highest returning of all the North West areas in terms of votes cast when Mr Nick Griffin was elected as an MEP in 2009.

So, if it’s not broken then why try and fix it? What’s all fuss? Who’s doing what and why? Who’s putting another spanner in the works if anyone is?

The powers that be have thrown everything they have at us…..and yet still we march on and on and on….they know and we know that we will never ever surrender…

Mr Nick Griffin MEP has decided to announce an end to his tenure as Chairman of the British National Party and he will gladly step down after fifteen years at the helm in 2013 to the huge disappointment of those who wanted to see Nick and the British National Party succumb to the relentless hostility, violence and be reeling in the gutter well before this date. Because it means no matter how much backing they had, they could not break the BNP.

And yet, we are having to face just one last final concerted effort – just one more trick up their sleeve from those that wish to derail this carriage of hope….and I am absolutely convinced that if they can’t break the unity of the British National Party now…. then they never will!

Full steam ahead!

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Daily Mirror is just one of those titles heavily involved in the smear campaigns against the British National Party, so I am sure nationalists will be delighted to hear that the useless marxist journalists working there are more unhappy than ever.

The Trinity Mirror has struck a deal with Press Association, subject to consultation, to outsource some sub-editing jobs on Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) to the agency’s base in Howden, Yorkshire.

The British Association of Journalists (BAJ) has been opposing the plan which comes as Trinity Mirror seeks to cut 140 staff jobs and 60 full-time casuals from the Daily Mirror, People and Sunday Mirror.

The BAJ has told Mirror management that MGN subs have “honed their skills to perfection over many years”, adding: “The idea that some inexperienced, young journalists on low wages in some subbing factory in the middle of Yorkshire can match the experience and ability of MGN’s subs and artists was nonsense.”

MGN group managing editor Eugene Duffy has defended the PA outsourcing move to the BAJ, and told the union that the editors agree with him. According to the BAJ, Duffy told them: “They believe PA can offer quality at a lower price.”

Trinity Mirror said in a statement today: “As part of our previously announced plans to introduce multimedia newsrooms, Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) has today agreed that the Press Association (PA) will provide a number of production functions for the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and the People, subject to consultation with staff and their representatives. The outsourcing proposals with PA mean that a number of subbing functions will transfer to PA’s base in Howden, Yorkshire.”

According to the BAJ The Sun, News of the World, Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday all employ at least twice as many journalists as the MGN titles.

Under current proposals the number of staff sub-editors on the main section of the Daily Mirror is due to be cut from 26 to seven.

It’s always nice to see those unwashed getting a taste of their own medicine, after the lies they printed about us they deserve everything they get.

On the other hand the BUJ missed the point.

MGN’s reporters usually write stories based on material provided to them by Searchlight and Hope Not Hate.

This job doesn’t require any particular skill or expertise, anyone can do it and this may explain why they don’t need many journalists.

Let’s hope that this move will accelerate the decline of the MGN’s papers, so that sooner rather than later all of them will disappear.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

If there is one man who would be a favourite for the top 10 most hated people in the UK, it is Trevor Phillips.

The Guyana-born chief of the EHRC uses his position to impose multiracialism on native Britons and doesn’t think twice about squandering huge amounts of money harassing and prosecuting any political organization that dares oppose mass immigration and multiculturalism.

As the EHRC carries on its legal action against the British National Party nationalists will be interested to know that Mr Phillips has billed the taxpayer more than £40,000 for a chauffeur-driven car to ferry him seven miles to work.

He complained he needed the vehicle because he was “expected to attend early-morning meetings” and made the luxury service a condition of his appointment.

The controversial chairman of the Equality and Human Rights Commission was chauffeured in the Honda Civic while he read newspapers in the back.

Although the London Underground starts as early as 5.40am on weekdays, the driver would collect him at his home in Crouch End, North London, and drive through the capital’s congestion charge zone to the commission’s office near London Bridge.

The journey would have taken about 25 minutes, a 10-minute saving on the same trip by public transport.

Mr Phillips, who earns about £120,000 a year, used the chauffeur for almost three years, only ditching the car after a “value for money” review of the commission’s spending in April.

Its long-awaited annual report for 2008-9, published last week, contains a damning assessment of abject management failings.

The commission employs more than 500 staff and receives £53million of public money. A spokesman insisted that the chauffeur-driven vehicle had not been for Mr Phillips’ exclusive use and other senior staff members had access to it.

He said: “He also used his time in the car to carry out work on behalf of the commission, such as reading reports.”

Tory MP Philip Davies said: “It’s impossible to justify. If he really believed in equality, he would have got the Tube like millions of other Londoners do every day. The commission is shambolic and a complete waste of money.”

I wonder if Philip Davies is serious?

Of course Trevor Phillips doesn’t believe in equality, he said he has a bust of Lenin in his office and it’s a known fact that in the former Soviet Union equality applied to everbody except the Communist elite which enjoyed privileges that ordinary people could only dream about. Herr Phillips is carrying on a long line of traditional commie hypocrisy.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It’s always a joy to see the antifascists getting a dose of indigestion.

In this case the target of their ire was Wigan’s Labour council because it had invited BNP leader Nick Griffin to town.

The boss of the ‘far-right’ party, accompanied by six minders, was among guests who turned up at St James’s Church, Orrell, last Sunday morning for new Mayor Coun Mike Winstanley’s traditional civic service.

The British National Party has been routinely lambasted by politicians of varying hues in the Wigan council chamber to the point of passing motions condemning its electoral campaigns and successes.

But invitations were sent out from the town hall to all North West MPs and MEPs – and Mr Griffin numbers himself among the latter since the last Euro elections.

The authority would not be drawn today as to whether his inclusion was deliberate or an oversight.

But pressure group Wigan Against Racism today said the BNP boss should have been snubbed – and in not doing so, the local authority was helping to “normalise” his politics.

The organisation’s spokeswoman, Fran McCaul, said: “What on earth is going on? This is highly distasteful.

“Wigan Council makes pronouncements about being anti-racist and then goes and completely contradicts itself.

“You can’t treat Nick Griffin like anyone else. His party is not like any other party. Saying he is automatically on the guest list is a weak response.

“There are exceptions to every rule and there should be a discussion about who gets invited.

“Nick Griffin being welcomed to events like this undermines the anti-racist movement and helps to normalise his type of politics.”

But Wigan Council’s executive director of business support services, David Smith, said: “We would like to reiterate the council’s pledge on anti-racism.

“The council is committed to respect for all ethnic groups and will encourage others to do the same.

“We are totally committed to an anti-racist future and we will support all those who suffer racism by doing everything in our power to tackle it

“We can confirm that our invitation list for the mayor’s Civic Sunday includes local constituency MPs and all North West MEPs.

“It was on this basis alone that Mr Griffin received an invitation.”

Charles Mather, Wigan and Leigh BNP group organiser, said: “I am not surprised Mr Griffin accepted the invitation as he is a hands-on MEP and takes his duties to his constituency seriously and would always endeavour to attend constituency functions if possible in spite of his busy schedule.

“I compliment Wigan Metro on this sudden concern for the democratic process in contrast to their previous use of council premises to attack our progress.

“Mr Griffin – as an elected MEP with over 7,000 votes in our area – has every right to receive and accept invitations to events such as this.

“We have a right to have our views represented and for our MEP to be invited to functions in our area.

“I take issue with the unelected Wigan Against Racism group’s definition of us as racist when our only aim is to protect and preserve the community and culture our forefathers worked and died to bequeath us.”

Mr Griffin also received support from a member of the St James’s congregation.

Local man Shaun Campbell was there with his young family when he saw Mr Griffin sitting near the front.

He said: “At first I thought it was someone who looked like him, but after mass we saw Mr Griffin’s bodyguards standing at the gates with the road blocked off by the police.

“Then I knew it had to be him so I waited for him to leave. Being a member of the BNP, I was chuffed to see him here in our village. He’s the last person I would have expected to see here.

“I had a little chat with him and he is a really nice bloke, had plenty of time to speak to us and even stopped for a picture. He and his bodyguards even took an interest in my baby son.”

Conservative Coun Winstanley, who did not draw up the guest list and who says he is trying to remain politically neutral during his year in office, declined to comment.

A piece of good news for a change.

Also it’s interesting to note that Wigan Today reported the news in a balanced way, quite unusual for a local paper that is usually hateful toward us, (I see they still use the somewhat unflattering photos though) and more interesting still is that they mentioned the positive opinion the local man had when he talked to Nick Griffin.

Just a question: Have any other MPs in the area made a good impression on local people, and have they spent any time talking with them in the way our Chairman did?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Life is getting tough for Labour in Barking & Dagenham.

We have already reported that the axing of the £270,000,000 Building Schools for the Future programme will mean B & D council has to scrap the building or renovation of ten schools, so it won’t meet the increase in demand for school places.

We need not remind you that it was Labour who created the problem in the first place when they decided to swamp the borough with immigrants in order to dilute the electoral base of the British National Party.

This gerrymandering was successful, but after the gain there is the pain.

Apparently the council has lost £5.5m in government funding and so it must add this figure to the £36,000,000 expenditure cuts already planned for the next four years.

As part of its many cash cutting measures the council has placed a virtual freeze on recruitment and is employing staff only when absolutely necessary.

But the most interesting development is that 150 council jobs will be lost this year, mostly through voluntary severance.

Nationalists will remember that during the electoral campaign antifascist groups delivered leaflets claiming that if the BNP gained the control of the council, essential services would be cut and many people would lose their jobs.

It was a lie, what a pity the voters of B & D believed it because they will be losing their jobs anyway.

Before sacking non essential council workers we would have targeted wasteful expenditure, (such as closing down the council-run newspaper, ending funding to immigrant groups and politically correct projects) and reduced the obscene amount of money paid to senior fat-cat civil servants, and if redundancies were unavoidable, then the chopper would have been used on those leeches with the non -jobs.

Because Labour will not target wasteful expenditure the pain will be so much greater, because the announced 150 job losses are only the start, many more redundancies will follow.

To our advantage this will help get BNP councillors elected in 2014.

The more Labour make uncomfortable decisions, the greater the number of voters who will be prepared to vent their anger on them and the signs are that it is beginning.

Most voted to keep the BNP out because they feared for their jobs, but in 2014 this will not be the case, hundreds will have lost their job by then as the council’ workforce is downsized.

I suspect that a great many of those sacked workers will change their minds and realise the error made in 2010, they may join the BNP supporters who are also angry, and believe they have been treated unfairly because what is more unfair than telling workers that the council cannot afford to employ them, when at the same time it can find £500,000 for a useless council newspaper?

Let’s hope that the day of reckoning starts sooner rather than later.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites