Tag Archive | "Conservatives"

From the USA, Immigration! A liberal speaks.

From the USA, Immigration! A liberal speaks.

The abiding dream of all nationalist’ is to close our borders, kick out illegal immigrants, stop giving benefits and council houses to asylum seekers and give incentives to legal immigrants to go back to their home countries.

Will anyone from the mainstream media support those policies? No of course not!

We know the answer to immigration, and apparently it is dawning on some liberal journalists in the USA  at last!

This is why I decided to present for nationalists’ delectation and delight a commentary published in ‘The Bulletin’, a Philadelphia based newspaper.

The author of this piece Jim Wiles, is robust in his hatred of the British National Party, but in his article he shows his thinking is in line with the policies of his target of scorn; it contains a lot of common sense, such common sense as would be unthinkable in the UK MSM.

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/12/12/commentary/op-eds/doc4b23fa9caa66e460370513.txt

Have you noticed the Mexicans are going home? Some are trying to tough it out – and apparently even asking for help from home, but the trend line in illegal immigration to the United States is definitely down.

It’s particularly noticeable here on the Redneck Riviera. In 2005 – 2006, the Grand Strand was one of the four fastest-growing areas in the country.

Illegal immigrants swarmed on construction sites and in all sorts of outdoor work. Food carts and local Mexican restaurants offered regional specialties. Lowes and McDonald’s had bilingual signs. The old day laborer market for local African Americans had disappeared, replaced by Hispanics.

One night, pulling out of the Food Lion two blocks from my parents’ house, I saw a scary sight: a Mexican mom, baby in one hand, handlebar in the other, pushing out into rush hour traffic to take the groceries — safely strapped into the baby seat — home. I followed her, running interference with my car, until she’d turned safely into her driveway.

She didn’t have a hand free to wave. But her smile lit up the night.

That was then. With the bursting of the boom, she’s gone. So’s the day laborer market. Gone, too, this summer, were the armies of Eastern European students who had worked here the previous two years in the hospitality and retail industries.

The current economic debacle, thus, contains within it at least one pearl: a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rectify our illegal immigration problem in a humane way.

In this 24-hour news cycle, we seem able only to focus on one story at a time. Yet, the illegal immigration story has not gone away. It’s still right there, festering.

This is important because illegal immigration is one of those “intractable” problems, which is destroying the legitimacy of America’s government. It’s not intractable. Our rulers, whatever their party, simply don’t want to stop illegal immigration.

A majority of the American people disagree – strongly. Today, with 10 percent unemployment, that disagreement is stronger than ever.

This gap between voters and their elected representatives exists in far worse form in Europe. One example is the European Union (E.U.) itself, opposed by most voters, but implemented anyway.

The most recent example is the Swiss referendum held two weeks ago. Fifty seven percent of Swiss voters supported a ban on construction of new minarets. The response of political leaders across Western Europe? To condemn this expression of the popular will and to fervently hope that the European Human Rights Court will strike it down.

In today’s Western Europe, nationalism has become the virtue, which dare not speak its name.

The Swiss vote came on the heels of the revelation that the wave of Muslim and other non-white immigration into the United Kingdom since the coming of Tony Blair and the Labor Party to power in 1997 was not, as most had thought, the result of government incompetence. It was a deliberate policy. The Laborites sought to change the U.K.’s racial and religious complexion to help achieve their goal of de-constructing British society.

Even with that bombshell, British Conservatives won’t touch immigration. So, is it any wonder, then, that some voters are turning to the neo-fascist British National Party, which promises to “guarantee that Britain remains British?” As I’ve noted here before, the re-emergence of such parties in Europe is the direct result of elected leaders repeatedly overriding the voters’ wishes.

Here, in the U.S., happily, we have the opposite of voter apathy: a full blown, populist rebellion. But, in all of the hullabaloo, the illegal immigration issue has, so far, gotten dropped by the wayside.

It’s clear that, like Britain’s Labor Party, the Obama Democrats view illegal immigration as in their political interest. Why else the repeated trumpeting this year that conservatives are going to end up on the ash heap of history because America’s demographic makeup is changing? And yet, like the Tories, the GOP is gun-shy about the illegal immigration issue.

In Italy, the government is offering money to illegal immigrants willing to be returned to their countries of origin.

Something like that might be a modest, first step towards tackling America’s illegal immigration problem. It would also immediately begin making private sector jobs available to unemployed Americans. According to recent press reports, it’s not just Hispanics anymore down at the day laborer line at Home Depot and Lowes.

They are people you and I know.

Jim Wiles is a Philadelphia lawyer. He can be reached at jwiles@thebulletin.us

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in Economy, Immigration, MiscComments (1)

Jon Cruddas’ reaction to the article I wrote about him.

Jon Cruddas’ reaction to the article I wrote about him.

After I named and shamed Jon Cruddas on this blog I emailed him to let him know about my article.

This was his reply:

“Good for you mate, tell bill bailey that our little conversation on Sunday has clearly been overtaken by events”

I don’t know what conversation Councillor Robert Bailey had him but how you can see he poked fun at me.

To put things into perspective when last year I made a similar complaint to all the councillors in Bexley, they contacted the borough Police commander and made clear they didn’t tolerate any attack on BNP activists.

Of course the reason for such zeal was that a few weeks before our candidate Michael Barnbrook missed a by-election victory by 8 votes in a ward were Conservatives used to have a strong majority.

Nonetheless they deserve credit for taking my complaint seriously, something Jon Cruddas didn’t do.

The way he behaved proves he supports violence against BNP activists, this is the only way for him to stay in power and milk more money from hard-working taxpayers.

So if someone is abused or assaulted in Barking & Dagenham he is the person to blame and the anger should be directed at him.

I repeat again, I blame Jon Cruddas and Margaret Hodge for the attack last week.

Jon Cruddas will be available to the voters on Friday the 20th of November at Dagenham Civic centre between 4pm-6pm.

Call 020 8984 7854 in case you need to book to meet him.

It will be interesting to see how he reacts if someone turns up to embarrass him.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

P.S. Not one of the Labour, Tory or Independent councillors from Barking & Dagenham has replied to me so far.

Posted in MiscComments (5)

The BNP, going from strength to strength.

The BNP, going from strength to strength.

The North-West region, which elected our Chairman Nick Griffin to the EU Parliament, is a vitally  important area for us.

It is a given, that in London native Britons are a rapidly shrinking minority, and most areas of London are so well enriched or brainwashed, it is imperative we concentrate on places where the BNP has the best chance of victory.

The result of the bye-election held in Penrith West, Eden Council, Cumbria, on the 8th of October, should cheer Nationalists in all parts of the country, and especially London.

The local activists’ goal was to better the 8.3% we got in June, as there was no chance we would win the seat, and with the Labour party using its normal smear campaigns against us as usual, but having little or no effect.

In fact our % vote increased to 13.75%, and we received 4 times the number of votes Labour did!

Here are the results:

Lib Dem – 387

Con – 157

BNP – 102 – 13.7 %

Ind – 58

Lab – 26

Greens – 18

Yes, as said before, four times the Labour total.  Oh! How that must hurt them! In fact we polled the same as Independent, Labour and the Greens added together.
.
A very good result for us, in a hard fight with the LibDems and Conservatives really going for it, despite a vicious smear campaign against us by “third parties”. With the Conservatives in their conference week, they expected to win!.
.
A good night for us and the Lib Dems, disastrous for the rest …… and Labour 26. Let’s just say that again: Labour 26!

So it’s not surprising that the MSM didn’t report this news, and it helps explain why Labour are squealing about our Chairman joining the panel on Question Time.

Let’s hope this good electoral result will motivate more activists to come out and help the party to win control of Barking & Dagenham next year.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in MiscComments (1)

Bexley Council Works Against Vunerable Residents

Bexley Council Works Against Vunerable Residents

Bexley Council is one of the few London Boroughs run by the Conservatives.  Is it any wonder Conservatives are a dying breed in London when half of London’s population is of migrant origin. However, it would seem the Tories still need to go along way to shed their ‘nasty party’ image.
Bexley Conservatives have just voted to change the delivery of meals on wheels in their borough. The BNP believe this service is so important that it should be delivered by in house caterers. Instead many councils like Bexley have sought to outsource the operation providing a poorer restrictive service to OAPs or increasing costs of meals.  It s a disgrace that people who contributed through taxes for most of their lives are hit when they are at their most vunerable.  However, is anyone really surprised by this? This is what Tories do with power.
Last year Bexley Council withdrew services from anyone with a ‘moderate’ assessment of need. They have though found the resources to buy the council leader a shiny new car. Derek Conway a Bexley MP was exposed by the BNPs own Sleeze Buster Michael Barnbrook for cooking the books and taking advatage of his allowances. Don’t tell me Bexley Conservatives did not know that Conway and his family were milking the taxpayer.
Labour and the Conservatives both need a wake up call. They need a sharp reminder that they are there to serve, not to dictate…and show some respect to the people that pay their wages,and pensions. Remember, you wake them up on June the 4th by Voting BNP…

Posted in PoliticsComments (1)

Boris ‘lets go’ of aide in ‘race gaffe’.

What if I asked what working class white Londoners are supposed to do, if they don’t like mass immigration into London? Would it be racist for a zealous black New Labour fan, to tell me that I should leave London if I don’t like diversity for the sake of diversity?

In a strange way, perhaps Mr McGrath should have resigned after all, because there is no way we in the BNP would have entertained such an absurd line of questioning. As a matter of fact, we would have turned the tables completly.

Is it not racist to assume that older Caribbean migrants would return to their home countries over a Tory mayor who has no race policies?

Is Marc Wadsworth (the ‘hack’ who questioned James) of the view that if we had a central government with no policies on race, that migrants would go home in their droves? It appears to be if one reads his article over at:

http://www.the-latest.com/blacks-should-go-back-home-if-they-dont-like-mayor

This particular paragraph is quite telling and dissapointing :

“Him, a guy from a country where Black people are the ‘Aboriginal’ indigenous nation who are stereotyped by the white colonisers as social security scrounging drunks, and me a confident, British-born Black activist and news media operator with a reasonable track record. I told him a little bit about my news media and campaigning background, including as a reporter/presenter at Thames Television and as the sort of ‘spin doctor’ and political facilitator for the Stephen Lawrence cause célèbre.”

I really don’t believe what I’m a reading. Only in Britain can someone make a remark that borders on racist about a white person AND get that white person out of a job!

If anything, the-latest.com should never have published such an article, if it contained a slur against white Australians.

Also, if Marc Wadsworth really gave a stuff about community relations between whites & blacks then he would have ensured that his articles had all instances of both the words “black” and “white” either capitalised or in lower case and not just having “Black” capitalised and “white” in lower case.

It’s not something he did by mistake, he’s done it in two articles now:

http://www.the-latest.com/the-latest-forces-sacking-of-race-gaffe-mayors-aide

http://www.the-latest.com/blacks-should-go-back-home-if-they-dont-like-mayor

Over and over as you read Marc’s main article, you’ll ask yourself the same question. Why is it not racist to pursue and have policies for the benefit of blacks but it suddenly is if we are talking about whites?

Posted in GLA, Immigration, PoliticsComments (3)


BNP.org.uk