Interesting piece of spin in the Daily Mail last Saturday when it reported that hundreds of children have no primary school place with the term already started as the recent baby boom has triggered an admissions crisis.

Thousands of other children are having to be taught in makeshift classrooms because of the overspill, which has been further increased by a recession-fuelled exodus from fee-paying private schools.

Councils in many parts of the country, including London and Birmingham, say applications for places are still being received.

Yet even some parents who applied in good time have yet to be allocated a school for their child.

Brent, in North West London, for example, has 210 four-year-olds still without a reception class place but only 24 vacancies in schools. The council is preparing to offer places in children’s centres if necessary.

Between them, councils including Ealing, Tower Hamlets, Harringey, Merton, Havering, Camden and Hammersmith and Fulham – all in London – as well as Kingston-upon-Thames in Greater London and Birmingham have hundreds of pupils yet to be placed: many of them late applicants.

Meanwhile officials in Newham, South East London, are considering putting four classes in a church hall following a sharp rise in children seeking places this year.

Hundreds of other schools across the country are using temporary prefabricated buildings on their own sites to accommodate additional pupils or are starting to construct permanent new classrooms.

In Hampshire, a school known for its eco-credentials, St Bede’s Primary, in Winchester, is seeking to concrete over a pond to accommodate a temporary classroom to cope with soaring pupil numbers.

Meanwhile, in Brighton, temporary classrooms are being purchased at a cost of £125,000 each.

In Leicestershire, Lady Jane Grey Primary, in Groby, gained emergency planning consent for a temporary classroom on its site.
Head Michael Fitzgerald said: ‘The school is facing a very difficult situation – there isn’t a spare cupboard in the building.’

Leeds is increasing capacity at 16 primaries from this month while in Bristol, six schools are gaining 22 temporary classrooms.

Birmingham is expanding nine schools to create an extra 330 places this month. It will need an additional 3,000 by 2020.

In many areas, schools have agreed to accept ‘bulge’ classes – an extra reception class which continues through the school.

They are meant to be a one-off but some schools have already taken them for two or three years running.

The Coalition has acknowledged the shortage of primary places is now ‘critical’ and claims the previous Labour government failed to make adequate preparations for the extra pupils despite warnings.

More than 1,000 primary schools have closed since 1999 amid accusations that some areas have taken a ‘short term’ view of likely demand.

Education Secretary Michael Gove plans to move cash from frozen secondary school building projects into providing primary places.

But the Mail’s survey of local education authorities reveals that many schools need huge sums of money to meet future demand. A spokesman for Kingston warned it would need as much as £70million.

Official figures show the number of babies born in 2006 – and now starting school – was the highest since 1993, with birth rates expected to continue to rise at least until 2018.

Latest projections suggest that primary school pupil numbers will rise by more than 500,000 in just eight years to 4,526,000, reaching their highest level since the 1970s.

The equivalent of more than 2,000 extra primary schools will be needed to cope, at a time of severe public spending cuts.

While classes for children in the first two years of school are limited in law to 30, teaching groups for older primary pupils could balloon as staff are diverted to teach the new influx of pupils.

In the meantime, pupils caught up in the crisis face being taught in overcrowded classes or travelling miles to their nearest school, and being split from siblings.

In Beaconsfield, Buckinghamshire, mothers had to mount a campaign to win an extra reception class at a popular school after being offered schools up to five miles away.

What the Daily Mail deliberately refuses to mention is that the main reason for this mess is mass immigration, and in fact nationalists will have noticed that the places where this problem is most acute are councils where native Britons are now a small minority.

But to understand this problem better you need look no further than Barking & Dagenham.

In the last seven years the birthrate in the borough increased by 50% and anyone who live there knows that this is not because long-term residents suddenly wanted to have bigger families but because Labour councillors swamped the borough with third-world immigrants.

Unsurprisingly this caused an increase in demand for school places but the axing of a £270m programme to build new schools and renovate existing ones is sending a shudder down Labour councillors’ spines as they cannot solve a problem they created in the first place.

Now, we said it many times before, without mass immigration there wouldn’t be any children taught in overcrowded and makeshift class rooms, once again we have been proved right.

The establishment knows it and that is why they are trying to destroy us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

How dare these six white Police officers defend themselves against accusations of ‘racism’! After all everyone knows that they are guilty as charged, as witnessed by an unbiased ‘Police Officer’ the charges should have been upheld. because as we all know only whites are ‘racist’ aren’t they.
Well, not insofar as the law is concerned.

Daily Mail

Six white policemen are suing their force for racial discrimination after being cleared of an alleged racially aggravated assault.
The officers, all members of Scotland Yard’s Territorial Support Group, have launched employment tribunal proceedings against the Metropolitan Police.

They claim they were subjected to racial discrimination following the incident in June 2007 that led to their arrest and trial.
PC Mark Jones, was among the six officers who spotted a group of youths allegedly mouthing obscenities at them as they were on patrol in central London.
When they came to a stop, three teenagers were allegedly taken into the van one by one and subjected to taunts.

PC Amechi Onwugbonu (Nigerian I assume), the van driver, who is black, gave evidence against PC Jones during the trial. He said the officer swore at and kicked one teenager and walked over another youth as he lay handcuffed on the floor of the vehicle.

He claimed a third teenager was sworn at, punched, kneed and slapped in the face.
But PC Jones denied acting in an unprofessional manner. PC Onwugbonu later admitted that he and PC Jones were ‘not best buddies’

The case came down to one officer’s word against another’s and the jury took five hours to clear PC Jones of two charges of racially aggravated common assault.

His colleagues who were accused of covering it up were found not guilty of misfeasance in public office. PC Jones and the other officers, Sergeant William Wilson, PC Steven White, PC Giles Kitchener, PC Simon Prout and PC Neil Brown, have all launched tribunal proceedings against the Met.

The employment tribunal proceedings were filed in mid-July and no date has yet been set for a hearing.

A Metropolitan Police spokeswoman said: ‘I can confirm that PC Mark Jones and others have submitted an employment tribunal claim citing racial discrimination.’

In a separate case, PC Jones is one of four officers accused of attacking terrorist suspect Babar Ahmad during a raid at his home in Tooting, South London, in 2003.

The officer, who is on restricted duties, is accused of assault causing actual bodily harm and will appear before magistrates in Westminster on September 22.

He will be joined in the dock by PCs Nigel Cowley, 32, and Roderick James-Bowen, 39, and Detective Constable John Donohue, 36.

The TSG came under scrutiny last month when the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to prosecute PC Simon Harwood who was filmed striking newspaper vendor Ian Tomlinson during last year’s G20 protests moments before he collapsed and later died.

Another TSG sergeant, Delroy Smellie, was previously cleared of assaulting a protester during a vigil for Tomlinson that took place the day after his death.

The Met has previously paid out to a white officer who claimed he had suffered racial discrimination.

Detective Chief Superintendent Barry Norman led the investigation into a senior officer, Ali Dizaei, for alleged corruption when Dizaei was acquitted of criminal charges. Dizaei was convicted and jailed this year for a separate offence.

Mr Norman’s supporters claimed he was ‘hung out to dry’. He said his career suffered as a result of the £2.2milllion inquiry and he was subsequently awarded £40,000.

I bet ACPO are spitting blood….

Share this post:

Hide Sites

During the GE campaign David Cameron promised to put a cap on the number of immigrants from non-EU countries allowed into the UK.

At that time I made the point that it was a big fat porkie pie intended to deceive the electorate, and persuade them not to give the BNP their vote.

Even if Mr Cameron wanted to reduce immigration he couldn’t, because immigration and asylum policies are decided by the EU (thanks to the Lisbon Treaty) and EU bureaucrats have the final say on those matters.

On top of that there is also the fact that anyone with an EU passport can come and live here freely and if someone thinks that getting a British passport is difficult, he/she can apply elsewhere and then move in the UK.

The latest developments prove that I was right.

A good analysis of the situation has been made by Richard North, former UKIP researcher (he left them a long time ago) who now writes for an anti-EU blog.

I reported his article in full below as it make some points that have been neglected by MSM.

EUReferendum
A breach in the dam

Something which is finally going to blow apart the vile construct that is the European Union is just beginning to emerge.

This is the news, offered fairly low-key at the moment, that EU member states are exploiting passport loopholes that potentially give nearly five million outsiders, mostly from Europe’s poorest countries, the coveted right to live and work in the EU.

And, of course, once they are inside the EU borders, they have freedom of movement and, eventually, unrestricted freedom of establishment. This means they can come over here and sponge off the over-generous welfare system which seems to favour immigrants above all else.

Now this is being given the Daily Mail treatment, and it is obvious that The Boy can do absolutely nothing about it, for all the bleating about immigration, the brown sticky stuff will be flying off the rotating air movement device in industrial quantities.

At the heart of this scam, which is making a complete mockery of our immigration policy – more so than it already has – are two countries, Romania and Bulgaria. They are handing out passports to ethnically linked groups or minorities outside their borders. Now Hungary plans to do the same, as of January.

The main beneficiaries are citizens of Moldova, Macedonia, Serbia, Ukraine and Turkey – about 4.7 million people with living standards at a fraction of the EU average. All are eligible for EU citizenship under passport giveaway programs.

And it gets worse. Others outside Europe, looking to escape hardship at home, are also lining up. Spain enacted legislation in January 2009 giving even the grandchildren of Spaniards whose ancestors left due to political or economic hardship caused by the Civil War the right to obtain passports from Madrid – and the response has been huge.

Spanish foreign ministry figures from January indicate that over the first full year of the law, there were 161,463 applications – 95 percent from Latin American countries. So far, 81,715 have been granted.

Total Latin American numbers are unavailable – but the Spanish foreign ministry has extended the window for applications by another year to December 2011, due to what it calls “overwhelming demand.”

In Cuba alone, nearly 82,000 people have applied for Spanish citizenship and 36,415 have received it as of 30 June, clearing the way for the lengthy and expensive process of obtaining permission to travel abroad – or leave permanently. Venezuela’s Spanish consulate has handed out more than 35,000 passports so far this year.

The number of Mexicans who could qualify is uknown, but 150,000 are estimated to be eligible. Of those, more than 14,000 people have been given Spanish citizenship and huge lines of passport-seekers form every day.

Then there are more than 2.6 million people of Italian origin – most of them also in Latin America – who already hold Italian passports. And, like Spain, Portugal grants passports to children and grandchildren of emigrés – most of them in sprawling Brazil, home to 200 million people.

Effectively, millions worldwide are eligible for EU passports, and in the world of the have-nots, getting a passport and welfare rights in the EU is like winning the lottery.

Basically, as this rolls out, and the world’s poor come flocking to the EU, their hands extended and their welfare eligibilities worked out well in advance, we are completely and truly stuffed. If ever there was an application for the word “sustainable”, as in “unsustainable”, it is our continued membership of the EU.

These bloody fools have started something they don’t even begin to know how to control. With stresses already building up an indigenous population which has been abused and ignored by the politicians, the backlash will make the BNP look like moderates and Powell’s “rivers of blood” speech sound like a description of a Sunday school outing.

Even now, they do not have the first idea of what is coming their way. But then, when a dam breaches, there is often little warning. At the first sign of a crack, therefore, it is wise to run. And the crack is showing … après moi le deluge.

Here there is a link to a similar article published on Business week:

Bloomberg Business Week

It’s worth a read, no one in the UK MSM has reported this news.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As the MSM campaign against the BNP is in full swing, nationalists will be delighted to know that sales at the “quality” end of the UK national newspaper market tumbled in June, according to the latest ABC print circulation figures.

The Times was down 14.8 per cent year on year (June 2009 – June 2010), the Telegraph dropped 18.5 per cent and The Guardian also dropped 14.8 per cent.

No UK-wide national title managed a year on year circulation rise, with the Daily Star yet to feel the benefits of its latest price cut to 10p.

The Times website paywall has only been in place since the start of this month, so it is too soon to say whether it will help shore up print sales.

The extent of the decline amongst the qualities has been exaggerated by the fact they have been stripping out free bulk sales and overseas copies from their circulations.

The biggest year-on-year faller was The Observer, down 20.3 per cent year on year to 326,821.

National newspaper print circulations for June 2010 (source ABC)

Average daily sale and percentage change year on year:

Dailies

Daily Mirror 1,248,919 -6.12

Daily Record 323,235 -6.90

Daily Star 809,992 -6.95

The Sun 2,979,999 -1.60

Daily Express 664,293 -8.94

Daily Mail 2,092,643 -4.93

The Daily Telegraph 681,322 -18.45

Financial Times 391,865 -4.88

The Herald 53,230 -7.84

The Guardian 286,220 -14.82

The Independent 187,135 -6.62

The Scotsman 44,318 -6.82

The Times 503,642 -14.77

Sundays

Daily Star Sunday 352,187 -8.78

News of the World 2,828,800 -6.27

Sunday Mail 387,367 -7.25

Sunday Mirror 1,147,926 -7.68

The People 519,273 -11.46

Sunday Express 566,934 -11.35

Sunday Post 324,965 -7.87

The Mail on Sunday 1,908,995 -7.29

Independent on Sunday 157,132 -3.29

The Observer 326,821 -20.28

Scotland on Sunday 55,663 -11.19

Sunday Herald 40,718 9.04

The Sunday Telegraph 508,706 -17.41

The Sunday Times 1,085,724 -10.30

As we said before media editors should blame themselves for their plight as more and more people are realising that what they read is not information but propaganda.

Let’s hope that sooner rather than later at least one of those papers will close down.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

H/T Northfield Patriot

The Daily Mail is noted for its publication of stories relating to enrichment of the UK, and expects its readers to comment, so far so fair. But when a subject such as the one below is published on the 7th July 2010 and by 10th (when I saw it online) we are told that, “We are no longer accepting comments on this article”. I ask myself WHY?

There have been articles printed in the Daily Mail that have many hundreds of red and green arrows, and the thread goes on for weeks before the “We are no longer accepting comments on this article” appears. Why has the “We are no longer accepting comments on this article” appeared within 3 days?
Might the readers of the Daily Mail be awakening to the time bomb that is sitting in our midst, and the editors of the Daily Backstabber know that the sleepers are awakening?

A school where 60 per cent of pupils speak English as a second language has invested in electronic translators for every child so they can communicate with teachers.
Manor Park Primary in Aston, Birmingham, which has 384 pupils of 32 different ethnicities, is the first school in Britain to provide translators for all of its children and to make the tools an integral part of every lesson.
The technology enables teachers to type messages to pupils which are then translated into the 19 native tongues of children with no English.

Helping hand: The Talking Tutor has been given to every pupil at Manor Park Primary School in Aston, Birmingham with half of those unable to speak English
Another 11 languages are spoken by pupils who have some English.
And with figures showing that one in six primary pupils speaks a different language at home – double the number ten years ago – the technology could soon become a permanent feature in many more schools.

The ‘Talking Tutor’ can verbally translate English into 25 languages including Polish, Urdu, Pakistani and Chinese. A further 200 languages can be translated on-screen.
Teachers type a message into a computer and the virtual tutor then reads the message out to the pupil in their native tongue. The pupil types a response which is read to the teacher by the tutor.
The software claims to be 95 per cent accurate as it uses ‘ contextchecking technology’ which gives the meaning of the message rather than a verbatim translation.
Headmaster Jason Smith said the software had transformed his school and given staff the opportunity to communicate with children.
‘We have a very diverse school – at any one time there are upwards of 30 different languages,’ he added.
‘We have always found this the biggest barrier to integrating a child into the school.’
The school pays £700 a year for the software, which comes with onteacher-screen ‘avatars’, or characters, based on the background of the pupils.

Diverse: Around 60 per cent of the 384 pupils at Manor Park school in Birmingham use the software:
Pictured are Kisha Iman Rahim (left), Shiloh Jarrett (middle), and Shardae Brooks, all 7, from Manor Park Junior School
These include an Asian man, a white Eastern European and a black African man. Plans are also in the pipeline to include a Chinese woman and a burka-wearing Muslim.
SPEAKING IN TONGUES
Some of the languages at Manor Park:
Punjabi (India)
Arabic (Middle East and Asia)
Kurdish (Kurdistan)
Urdu (India)
Amharic (Ethiopia)
French (Congo)
Bengali (Bangladesh)
Pashto (Afghanistan)
Somali (Somalia)
Danish (Denmark)
Teregani (Gambia)
Patois (Jamaica)
Mirpuri (Pakistan)
Mandarin (Chine)
Cantonese (China)
Dari (Afghanistan)
Malay (Malaysia)
Welsh
The software, developed by Lincoln-based EMAS UK, cost more than £2.5million to produce.
Dawn Holt, a teacher at the school, admitted she had struggled in the past to communicate with pupils who had recently arrived in Britain.
She said: ‘You could never have a who could speak all those languages, so I think this technology is probably here to stay.’
But critics say that giving pupils computerised translators could be ‘damaging and dangerous’.
Nick Seaton, chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, said: ‘Surely it would be better to give all these foreign-speaking youngsters an intensive course in English.’
There were mixed reactions to the translator last night from parents of Manor Park pupils.
One father of two, who did not want to be named, (no surprise there then, accusations of racist would surely be flying about) said: ‘My boys say teachers are spending more time using the computer than teaching.
‘They came home last week and said they felt pushed aside. The teachers are neglecting the English kids.’
But another parent, Carol Barnes, 45, was in favour. She said: ‘It’s another way they can teach the kids and it’s also a way of getting non-English-speaking pupils to communicate with English speakers.’

Translation tutorial: Manor Park primary school in Aston, Birmingham
Latest figures from the Department for Education show that 905,610 children do not speak English as their first language.
This figure has risen by 42,750 in a year, and accounts for 16 per cent of pupils in primary schools and 11.6 per cent in secondaries.

As a postscript, why do 905,610 children not have English as a first language? Surely the parents of these 905,610 children want their offspring to be able to converse in the mother tongue of the country in which they reside! Where were these 905,610 children born? Because if they were born in the UK it should be that whatever language the parents speak would be secondary to ours.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Daily Mail 2nd July 2010

13 ‘youths’ murdered so far this year. I use the word ‘youth’ advisedly, this word is a euphemism for non ethnic children/adolescents, because when crimes are committed by white children/adolescents a euphemism is not required, the word ‘white’ is used. When adults are involved the only time the ethnic origin of the offender is mentioned is when he/she is white. Until the real story is in the general purview, or has been revealed by non NUJ journalists. then the offender is classed as a ‘person’.
So when you read an article or see a news report, and the offender is not described as ‘white’, you can take it as read that the said offender is non indigenous to these shores.
Now all those that have removed their heads from their jacksies will know exactly what I mean, those still in a yoga position will be deaf to the warning that the ‘powers that be’ encourage the use of the word ‘youth’ to hide the truth. Look at the MSM and see how often the word ‘youth/s’ turn up.

Caught on CCTV: Police launch hunt for vandals who defaced Stephen Lawrence memorial. And I just love the juxtaposition of this little beauty…. “vandals” tried to destroy the Steven Lawrence centre a few years ago and the “liberals” were rubbing their hands with glee as it might have been attacked by the “far right” and embarrassingly it was found out to be black kids, so it was quickly swept under the carpet.
Why, oh why does he have special status? What next a sainthood?
Donna

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As the MSM are still attacking the BNP, nationalists will be delighted to hear that circulation of anti-BNP newspapers declined again in May.

The Daily Star ended a long run of year-on-year circulation rises in May, dropping 2.1 per cent to 822,934.

It meant that no UK-wide national newspaper put on sales year on year in May.

The Daily Mirror dropped 6.6 per cent year on year to 1,238,145, The Sunday Mirror dropped 5.9 per cent to 1,148,107 and The People dropped 9.7 per cent to 526,438.

Trinity Mirror announced yesterday that it was to cut around 200 jobs, or up to 40 per cent of the total editorial workforce, at its three national newspaper titles.

Elsewhere in the popular and mid markets, The Sun was the best performer – dropping by just 1.6 per cent to an average sale of 2,936,099. The paper continues to sell for 20p in many parts of the country.

The News of the World, which in May had a massive exclusive about Sarah Ferguson, dropped just 2.2 per cent to 2,858,727.

Full national newspaper ABC figure for May 2010: Source ABC

(Average daily sale for May followed by percentage change year on year

National Morning Popular

Daily Mirror 1,238,145 -6.57

Daily Record 328,618 -6.26

Daily Star 822,934 -2.11

The Sun 2,936,099 -1.61

Total of average daily net circulation 5,325,796 -3.18

National Morning Mid Market

Daily Express 663,627 -7.79

Daily Mail 2,090,469 -4.83

Total of average daily net circulation 2,754,096 -5.56

National Morning Quality

The Daily Telegraph 698,456 -16.49

Financial Times 399,862 -2.69

The Herald 54,943 -6.20

The Guardian 300,472 -10.47

The Independent 194,501 -4.85

The Scotsman 45,352 -5.84

The Times 515,379 -12.82

Total of average daily net circulation 2,208,965 -11.12

National Morning Sporting

Racing Post 56,818 -10.85

National Morning Group

National Sunday Popular

Daily Star Sunday 357,130 -0.72

News of the World 2,858,727 -2.24

Sunday Mail 389,218 -8.76

Sunday Mirror 1,148,107 -5.92

The People 526,438 -9.74

Total of average Sunday net circulation 5,279,620 -4.25

National Sunday Mid Market

Sunday Express 568,247 -10.66

Sunday Post 328,129 -8.26

The Mail on Sunday 1,918,512 -7.11

Total of average Sunday net circulation 2,814,888 -7.98

National Sunday Quality

Independent on Sunday 164,188 -1.95

The Observer 340,247 -16.10

Scotland on Sunday 57,057 -8.04

Sunday Herald 42,275 9.19

The Sunday Telegraph 512,819 -17.18

The Sunday Times 1,117,749 -6.42

Total of average Sunday net circulation 2,234,335 -10.17

The more newspapers keep lying, the greater the number of people that will vote with money from their own pockets and choose to stop buying them.

This trend is not going to be reversed until media tycoons stop paying lip service to their political puppet masters and the anti-British NUJ, unfortunately for them the people are waking, and can see that what is printed is not information but propaganda.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As the MSM are more than ever committed to their smear campaign against the British National Party, nationalists will be delighted to hear that only two national newspapers record a year-on-year slight increase in their circulations last month, according to figures released today by the Audit Bureau of Circulations.

The Independent on Sunday recorded a year-on-year rise in circulation of 1.88 per cent to a weekly average of 168,151 in April, while the Daily Star saw its circulation rise by an almost negligible 0.05 per cent to a daily average of 823,025.

In stark contrast, The Observer, The Sunday Telegraph, The Guardian, The Times and The Daily Telegraph all recorded double digit declines in circulation year-on-year.

National newspaper circulation figures for April 2010 (source ABC)

Figures given are per issue sale for the month and percentage change year on year

Daily Mirror 1,239,691 -6.13

Daily Record 331,012 -7.08

Daily Star 823,025 0.05

The Sun 2,955,957 -0.06

Daily Express 665,731 -8.26

Daily Mail 2,096,074 -3.86

The Daily Telegraph 683,220 -11.81

Financial Times 386,590 -8.19

The Guardian 288,917 -15.83

The Independent 188,119 -7.98

The Times 506,997 -14.18

Daily Star Sunday 348,188 -2.64

News of the World 2,905,780 -1.04

Sunday Mirror 1,124,080 -7.63

The People 530,117 -8.31

Sunday Express 574,323 -9.90

The Mail on Sunday 1,983,283 -4.40

Independent on Sunday 168,151 1.88

The Observer 331,791 -21.30

The Sunday Telegraph 510,146 -10.84

The Sunday Times 1,135,077 -7.09

It’s interesting to see that the newspapers with the sharpest decline are the ones that printed more lies about the BNP.

It’s worth remembering that the Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph used to say BNP members are a bunch of idiots whereas the Times and Sunday Times printed stories based on lies to stop people supporting us.

Clearly nationalists have voted with their pockets and decided to boycott them, and apparently this strategy is working because their decline in circulation is putting pressure on their balance sheets and some are planning job cuts in order to reduce their losses.

This trend is unlikely to be reversed until media tycoons understand that by pandering to the NUJ they are digging their own grave as people have had enough of their lies and propaganda.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Gordon Brown is gone but the damage he and his party have wreaked on this country is still present and most unlikely to disappear.

The list of destructive policies implemented by the previous Labour government is long, but at the top of it is mass immigration, engineered to change the fabric of British society against the wishes of British voters.

One example can be found in a story published by the Daily Mail about an illegal immigrant and convicted fraudster, fighting deportation to the Middle East because he claims it infringes his human rights because he needs regular dialysis for kidney failure.

In a move that critics said underlined the chaos of Britain’s asylum system under Labour, it emerged that he is being put up in a nursing home at a cost to the taxpayer of £700-a-week.

Mashal Almansour, 38, who has already had an unsuccessful kidney transplant on the NHS, was jailed for three years after conning banks and building societies out of £800,000 in a sophisticated mortgage scam.

He used the money to fund an enviable lifestyle, enjoying luxury cars and comfortable homes, but following his conviction he claims to have lost the lot.

Now suffering from kidney failure, he is fighting deportation back to Jordan on the grounds that it would infringe his human rights.

Almansour claims he wouldn’t be able to afford three-times-a-week dialysis in his native country and would die within weeks.

His battle to avoid deportation is also likely to be aided by public funds, and his case will add to fears that Labour’s pledge of getting tough on foreign criminals is not being met.

Shortly after becoming Prime Minister, Gordon Brown warned them that ‘if you commit a crime you will be deported’, declaring: ‘You play by the rules or you face the consequences.’

Last night, critics said it was outrageous that a convicted conman with no right to be in Britain could receive so much support.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘This is a huge cost, week on week, and local taxpayers are forking out for it.

‘Many local authorities’ budgets are stretched right now.

‘Members of the public will be angry that Mr Almansour is in this country illegally, benefiting from taxpayer-funded care, despite the fact that he has ripped off taxpayers with his criminal behaviour.’

Almansour came to Britain 14 years ago and applied for citizenship. But he withdrew his application and has lived here illegally ever since.

He worked as a delivery driver and a takeaway worker before starting his own mortgage firm, using a string of false names to rip off banks and building societies for thousands of pounds.

Jailing him for three years in 2007 at Bradford Crown Court, Judge James Spencer QC called the scam a ‘cynical manipulation’ and said Almansour was guilty of ‘serious criminal dishonesty’.

Home Office officials began deportation proceedings when Almansour – whose marriage to a British woman collapsed following his conviction – was released from jail after 18 months.

Speaking yesterday at his nursing home in Stockport, Almansour said: ‘My main concern is that Jordan is not my home.

‘I do not have family or friends. Without dialysis, the doctors say I would die within a few weeks.

‘If I am sent back it will be a death sentence.’

Almansour also claims he has not lived in Jordan long enough to be eligible for scarce state-funded treatment there.

His friend Carol Wilde added: ‘He made a mistake and got greedy. It was a mistake and he paid his time for it.’

The UK Borders Agency said only the most seriously ill illegal immigrants could stay on compassionate grounds.

A spokesman said: ‘Before deportation takes place there is a right of appeal to an independent tribunal who will consider whether removal is appropriate.’

Stockport council, which is footing the £700-a-week nursing home bill, said it had a legal obligation to step in.

Last night a spokesman said: ‘Under the National Assistance Act the council has a legal duty in certain circumstances, for example an unheard appeal on the grounds of human rights, to assist people who have no recourse to public funds.’

How many old people are dying every year in Stockport because they cannot afford to pay for heating and eating?

We would be interested to know but don’t hold your breath, after all under Labour, people who shouldn’t be here in the first place have more rights and more assistance than Britons who were born here and paid taxes all their life.

Stories like these explain why we got 576,000 votes in the last general and local elections and why we are now the 4th biggest party in Britain.

We are here to stay and to fight for what we think is right and to offer a fair society to British people.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It’s election time and, as usual, newspapers will be busy printing smear articles against the British National Party in order to appease their political supporters who want to stop us by any means at their disposal.

The Daily Mail published an article with the headline “As loathsome as ever: Nick Griffin’s BNP is STILL the party of racist lies, violent thuggery and vicious anti-semitism”, doesn’t leave any doubt about the kind of stuff they write about us.

However I have some good news for any nationalist that finds this kind of journalism unacceptable.

A few weeks ago the Daily Mail was censured by the Advertising Standards Authority for a misleading ad suggesting readers would be given a free DVD with the next day’s paper.

The advertising watchdog banned publisher Associated Newspapers from running the ad in its current form after upholding a complaint from two readers.

The front-page flash ad stated “free with tomorrow’s mail Poirot free DVD”.

The readers told the ASA they believed the ad was misleading as it did not make clear the DVD had to be collected from Tesco or WH Smith rather than being included with the newspaper.

“The front-page flash on the promotional issue of the newspaper stated that the DVD had to be collected from Tesco or WHSmith,” the ASA ruling concluded.

“However, we considered that the front-page flash claim on the previous day’s newspaper…had implied that the DVD would be included with the following day’s newspaper…

“Because the DVD was not available with the following day’s newspaper, as implied by the front-page flash, we concluded that it was misleading.”

Associated Newspapers told the ASA that the claim “free with” was justifiable for a front-page flash that appeared the day before a promotional issue of the paper.

The publisher said it believed that the use of the word “with”, as opposed to “inside”, was fair in the circumstances.

The ASA warned the Daily Mail that it needed to ensure future pre-promotional front-page flashes used wording that clearly explained the nature of the offer.

Now how cab a newspaper claiming the moral high ground describe us as vile when it misleads its readers in that way? At least you get what you see with the BNP.

This is not an isolated case as at the begin of February the ASA again censured the Daily Mail, that time for running a “misleading” ad claiming readers could get a free MP4 player with the Mail on Sunday.

Responding to a complaint from a reader, the ASA said the promotion gave “very low prominence” to a disclaimer stating that tokens needed to be collected for the offer and that receiving the video playing device would incur postage and packaging costs.

The ASA ruled: “The ad featured a small disclaimer, ‘token collect and p&p applies’. We also noted, however, that the body of the text stated prominently ‘get your MP4 video player free with tomorrow’s Mail on Sunday’, which, we considered, was likely to lead consumers to expect that the MP4 player was available in the Mail on Sunday.

“Because the qualifying disclaimer was of very low prominence and because it contradicted the claims in the body copy, we concluded that the ad was likely to mislead.”

The Daily Mail said all its pre-promotion material and ads for the offer stated clearly that it was a token collect promotion.

Despite this the advertising watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again in its current form.

The ASA ruling added: “We told the Daily Mail to ensure future similar promotions made prominently clear that readers were required to collect tokens to respond to the offer.”

So nationalists can see how this newspaper was caught deceiving its readers twice in the last couple of months.

Does anyone believe this is a coincidence?

I don’t think so.

In any other circumstance we could ignore this, as the best way to deal with this kind of behaviour is to stop buying it, but as the Daily Mail is abusing its position to throw rubbish against a legitimate political party we believe it’s very important to shame them for their behaviour.

If a newspaper thinks it’s OK to carry misleading advert, why should voters believe a single word of what they say about us?

You have got my point.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

You know it’s election time when newspapers ramp up the printing of anti BNP articles in the vain attempt to convince people not to vote for us.

It has become an established ritual, the treacherous political elite running this country is very afraid of our electoral success, because it means they will be observed from inside the chamber, their plan to destroy Britain and create the NWO will be exposed by our newly elected MPs.

The recent articles published in the Daily Mail and Daily Telegraph are not worth comment, they don’t add anything that nationalists haven’t already read.

Nonetheless it’s still interesting to see how the quality of the journalists writing for them is so low it makes me wonder if they wrote the articles themselves or copied and pasted material written by some antifascist high on dope.

An example of this can be found in the Daily Telegraph, Tanya Gold gives an account of the BNP day of action in Barking last Saturday.

The article is biased against the BNP of course, but that will surprise no one.

However there is a quote that alone will make voters think twice before believing all the negative stories about the BNP:

“Nick Griffin is standing here against Margaret Hodge, the Labour Minister of State for Culture and Tourism (majority: 8,883). It is a stunt. But it is possible that Barking and Dagenham could soon have a BNP-controlled council. It is now the second largest party at local level with 15 seats and they aim to take absolute control; along with Stoke, this borough is the centre of BNP hopes. ”

Did you notice anything?

Yes, according to Mrs Gold we have 15 seats in Barking & Dagenham.

Now anyone knows how hardworking BNP activists are but they are still unable to perform miracles and increase the number of councillors from 12 to 15 before the election.

Anyone can look at the Barking & Dagenham’ website and see how many councillors we have so the fact that this mistake could be printed unproofed says a lot about the quality of Daily Telegraph’ reporters.

If this is the standard of journalism expected from the DT, why do people believe all the negative stuff printed about the BNP when they can’t get the number of councillors right?

Maybe Andrew Gilligan should look at this, after all he is trying to convince people that we are a bunch of useless idiots (nothing like the NUJ though).

I have said before we must invent a Pulitzer price for stupidity, and award it to the writer of the silliest story of the year.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It’s a known fact that the BBC is anti-white and anti-British, and when it reports violent crimes committed by immigrants, it never mentions the ethnicity of the attackers.

The latest example of biased reporting happened a few days ago when four Afghan asylum seekers (there is no such thing as an asylum seeker in the UK, all asylum seekers are bogus) were arrested after claims that they had sexually assaulted a 13-year-old girl in a public swimming pool.

The youths, aged 14 to 17, are alleged to have attacked the girl whilst on a supervised visit to a leisure centre.

It is not known whether their ‘carer’ was in the water or even near the pool at the time.

After the victim complained to police, officers studied CCTV footage from the leisure centre and arranged for the youths to attend a police station for questioning.

There they were arrested and then released on police bail. All four deny any wrongdoing.

The alleged attack happened at the Larkfield Leisure Centre in Aylesford, Kent.

The Afghans, who arrived in the UK as ‘unaccompanied minors’ and speak little English, live 15 miles away in a residential unit for young asylum seekers in the countryside near Staplehurst.

This is  how the BBC reported the story (the above was from the Daily Mail):

Four teenagers have been arrested after a girl was sexually assaulted in a swimming pool in Kent.

The 13-year-old was attacked while in the pool at Larkfield Leisure Centre in Aylesford last week.

Police said the boys, two 14-year-olds, a 15-year-old and a 17-year-old, were questioned and have been released on bail until 11 May.

Kent Police said officers were currently examining CCTV footage from the leisure centre.

A spokeswoman for Kent Police said: “Police are investigating a report of a sexual assault on a 13-year-old girl at Larkfield Leisure Centre on March 25 of this year.

“Four teenage boys aged between 14 and 17 were arrested in connection with this incident and they are currently on police bail while further enquiries are carried out.”

A spokesman at Larkfield Leisure Centre said: “We are co-operating with the police investigation.”

Nationalists will notice that the BBC was a little economical with facts, so as not to present the “alleged” attackers and bogus asylum seekers in a bad light, and so present the truth about a culture of misogynistic behaviour becoming the norm. ( I understand that one can age a horse by its teeth, what a pity we cant do this for humans, we might discover the actual age of these “children”.)

Further proof that the BBC is run by marxists who want the destruction of Britain.

It’s time to scrap the TV licence and heavily downsize this bloated corporation whose workers get huge salaries at the expense of ordinary people forced to pay this regressive tax.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

One of the arguments used in support of mass immigration is that without immigrants the NHS would collapse.

We all know this is a big, fat lie because there are British doctors and nurses who are forced to work abroad because they cannot find a place in the NHS.

Adding insult to the injury, many of those foreign NHS workers have dubious qualifications, lack a grasp of even basic English and so put the lives of patients at risk.

Confirmation comes from the Daily Mail, in an article it claims that hospitals are being forced to send foreign staff to English lessons because they can’t understand basic phrases such as ‘nil by mouth’.

Nurses, cleaners and porters recruited from overseas are being “offered” a 10-week courses funded by the Government to help improve their language skills.

Although many have a very good grasp of textbook English, they struggle with common abbreviations used on the ward such as ‘bleeping a doctor’ or ‘doing the rounds’.

John Radcliffe Hospital staff admit there have been ‘near-disaster’ cases when a porter has mistakenly delivered a meal to a patient having not understood the ‘nil by mouth’ sign on the bed stating he cannot eat or drink.

Although all doctors recruited from outside the EU must pass a special English language test set by the General Medical Council before they can practice, the same rules do not apply for other hospital workers.

Instead staff including nurses, cleaners and porters are usually assessed on their grasp of English at their interview.

Overseas workers at Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals, Oxford are being encouraged to attend 10-week English for Speakers at Other Languages courses run at the nearby Oxford and Cherwell Valley College.

More than 70 different nationalities are employed at the trust, largely from the Philippines, Poland, Burma and the Caribbean.

But other hospitals have similar schemes, all funded by the Department of Health.

There have been increasing concerns over the language skills of foreign doctors since the death of 70-year-old David Gray in 2008, killed by a German GP whose English was so appalling he had been rejected by other health authorities.

Dr Daniel Ubani, 67, was covering an out-of-hours-practice in Cambridge, had never had an English test courtesy of an EU loophole which allows doctors from member states to work in Britain without having their language skills or qualifications checked.

Staff at the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals said that English lessons for overseas workers should be compulsory – rather than on a voluntary basis as is currently the case.

Jacquie Pearce-Gervis, of the Oxford Radcliffe Patients’ Forum, said: “Patients and relatives have been calling for this for a long time.

‘The language barrier can be a real issue. The most common problem is “nil by mouth”.

‘There have been cases when porters have delivered a patient food despite the fact there is a clear sign on their bed saying “nil by mouth”.

‘Obviously this could have led to disaster but fortunately the patient has been intelligent enough to point out that they are not allowed the food.

‘I think it should be compulsory. There can often be problems with common slang terms used on the ward.’

Another member of staff, who did not wish to be named, said: ‘It’s a real problem here and the language lessons can only be a good thing. We have so many foreign employees here and it’s very worrying if they don’t speak English.’

Rainy Faisey, deputy director of Human Resources at Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals, said the courses were a way of giving staff in lower-paid jobs a chance to develop their skills and further their careers as part of the NHS ‘Widening Participation’ initiative.

‘As an employer, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust offers a wide variety of training and development opportunities to its staff to help them to provide excellent care for our patients and further their career in the NHS.

‘Like all good employers we provide all our staff with the opportunity to develop their reading, writing and numeracy skills, whether their first language is English or not. ( I wonder if like me you would prefer them to learn the English language with all its little idioms before they are allowed to play life and death games with NHS patients. )

‘These courses are centrally funded by the European Social Fund and Skills for Life in the Workplace.

‘Our overseas staff are an integral, important and valued part of our workforce.’

It might be interesting to know how much the English lessons for the 70 different languages have cost taxpayers, and how many NHS patients are being deprived of vital drugs by our contributions to the EU to pay for these lessons?

Let’s not forget this is the same NHS that denies life-saving medicines on the grounds of cost.

Maybe Rainy Faisey should explains why his/her NHS trust doesn’t employ British workers.

We have said before and we will say it again. “Hiring foreign doctors and nurses is not just a slap in the face for the thousands of Britons who spent time and money getting a medical qualification, it also harms the third world, because native speaking doctors are desperately needed in  their own countries”.

This is not just unfair it is madness, and it’s time to stop it.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As the electoral campaign is gearing up could the Daily Mail refrain from attacking the BNP?

Of course not and this is why Martin Samuel wrote a column explaining why the BNP are a bunch of violent racist scum.

However this was not enough as Mr Samuel claimed that Ian Hindle and Andrew Wells, two names on the BNP membership list, in 2008 were convicted of sexually abusing 14-year-old schoolgirls.

This story came up before and we stated that those two people were not BNP members but we know that journalists are more than happy to print lies.

And not only about us.

This is the same Daily Mail that has been censured by the Advertising Standards Authority for running a “misleading” ad claiming readers could get a free MP4 player with the Mail on Sunday.

Responding to a complaint from a reader, the ASA said the promotion gave “very low prominence” to a disclaimer stating that tokens needed to be collected for the offer and that receiving the video playing device would incur postage and packaging costs.

The ASA ruled: “The ad featured a small disclaimer, ‘token collect and p&p applies’. We also noted, however, that the body of the text stated prominently ‘get your MP4 video player free with tomorrow’s Mail on Sunday’, which, we considered, was likely to lead consumers to expect that the MP4 player was available in the Mail on Sunday.

“Because the qualifying disclaimer was of very low prominence and because it contradicted the claims in the body copy, we concluded that the ad was likely to mislead.”

The Daily Mail said all its pre-promotion material and ads for the offer stated clearly that it was a token collect promotion.

Despite this the advertising watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again in its current form.

The ASA ruling added: “We told the Daily Mail to ensure future similar promotions made prominently clear that readers were required to collect tokens to respond to the offer.”

So how a newspaper that deceives its readers with a misleading advert can be trusted to tell the truth?

We know the answer but this is what you get when the ruling elite is running scared of us because they know we are the only political party in touch with ordinary citizens.

Not bad for a bunch of useless idiots (this is what Andrew Gilligan thinks of us).

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As we have said before, the BNP should create a ‘Pulitzer’ prize for idiocy, awarded to the journalist writing the most stupid, inaccurate, and mind numbingly boring article of the year.

There are no shortage of candidates, but actually finding a winner would be hard work, and take a lot of time from our hard-working activists. One of those candidates should be David Jones.

In an article printed by the ‘Daily Mail’, he made a shocking revelation about the BNP, he disclosed the identity of our most generous donor.

Mr Jones found it amazing that this person is a wealthy aristocrat married to a Serbian woman. (Why?)

Nothing any Nationalist would find strange in this, but clearly impossible to explain to the liberal bleeding heart marxist bigots running the British media.

In a statement which encapsulates the kind of lies used to attack us he says:

“Although she was born in Bedfordshire, Zorka considers herself half-English and half-Serb, speaks with a very slight Eastern European accent (presumably because she was raised to be bilingual), is Serb Orthodox by religion and celebrates both Serbian and English festivals.

This kind of duality would hardly be welcomed in Griffin’s ethnically sanitised Utopia. After all, during last week’s Question Time debacle, the BNP leader described white Britons as ‘aboriginals’: English, Scots, Irish and Welsh people ‘who have been here for the last 17,000 years’.

Ludicrously, Mrs Wentworth – who met her husband eight years ago, when she was working as a chef in the local pub, and became his third wife last year – would not even be permitted to join the party her husband bankrolls so generously.
Charles and Zorka Wentworth are evidently struggling to see the irony.”

I suspect Mr Jones is unaware of the many BNP officers who are not native Britons but care more about this country than many British-born self-loathing white liberals.

As we all know, the ‘Daily Mail’ always does it’s best to print smear stories attacking us, trying to persuade  its readers that BNP supporters are racist, illiterate, idiotic white thugs.

This is why Mr Jones adds:

“Talking to the BNP’s most unlikely darling couple this week, over cups of tea in their stylish country kitchen, I began to understand why.

They seem far removed from the hate-filled BNP rabble-rousers who wave banners in Northern mill towns (how patronising and superior, what is wrong with Northern mill towns?). And as Mr Wentworth remarks wryly, he is no ‘knuckle-dragging’ skinhead.

Yet they give the distinct impression that they don’t know nearly enough about Griffin and his racially divisive policies, even though Mr Wentworth says he read ‘the bulk of’ the party’s manifesto before opening his cheque-book. ‘Is it really £38,000? I thought it was £28,000, but I can’t recall. I don’t keep personal bank records.’

Mr Jones fails to grasp the idea that Mr Wentworth supports the BNP because he doesn’t want this country to become a multiracial hellhole, and maybe wants Britain to be as safe as he is in his little haven of peace and tranquility.

As for his Serbian wife, i suspect she knows only too well how a multicultural society is fertile ground for civil war, we all know what happened in Yugoslavia. Mr Jones failed to ask an important question: “What do you feel about the Balkanisation of Yugoslavia, and do you see the enrichment of the UK as a change for the best”?

The article then goes on, why does a man who has lived in the USA, and mixed with foreigners so anti-immigration.

Clearly for Mr Jones it’s difficult to accept that the BNP is enjoying support among ordinary people who mix with people from different ethnic backgrounds.

It may explain why he uses these patronising words to conclude his article:

“This reinforces one’s impression that the couple, though not by nature malevolent, are dangerously naive and that – in the absence of persuasive policies from the main parties – the BNP are playing on their fears to maximum effect.

Judging by the names listed among the party’s major financial backers this week, other unlikely figures are falling into the same trap.
They include Plymouth widow Mrs Sheila Butler, the 83-year-old greatniece of World War I hero Lord Horatio Kitchener, who has donated her £11,032 savings to the BNP, because, she told me: ‘Nick Griffin is a patriot – like my great-uncle.’

She said she had abandoned the Tories, and then UKIP, because “I don’t like it that most people [here] are brown, yellow or green these days”, and the BNP was the only party that promised to recreate Britain as the country of her youth.

Another prominent donor is Kent fruit farmer Adam Champneys, who is reported to have given the BNP £15,000 in the past year alone. He is battling a serious illness and was unavailable for comment this week.
However, like Charles Wentworth and Kitchener’s great-niece, this accomplished pilot and antiques collector, who served in the Intelligence Corps, is far removed from the disaffected, down-at-heel rabble one normally associates with the BNP (down at heel rabble? superior and insulting).

Whether or not we believe the BNP’s spin doctors when they claim that membership inquiries have soared on a wave of public sympathy after Griffin’s Question Time mauling, it would be foolish to ignore their broadening appeal.

For when a wealthy English landowner places one hand around the shoulder of his new Eastern European bride and with the other signs a £38,000 cheque to a party who would banish her from the country of her birth, we should all feel more than a little worried.”

Yes he is right, the treacherous elite who destroyed this country and treated the white working class with contempt should be worried, ordinary people are starting to wake up, and join the fight to save their country so as to give a future for the next generation. The ‘superior’ and treacherous elite will be punished for their crimes.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The Mainstream Media (MSM) keep smearing the BNP, but Nationalists will be delighted to know that the circulation of these anti-BNP newspapers dropped again in August.

According to the Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) the number of copies sold in August, apart from a few exceptions, fell since the previous August.

Daily papers:

Daily Telegraph: 814,087, down 5.4 per cent

Financial Times: 395,845, down 5.2 per cent

The Guardian: 311,387, down 6.4 per cent

The Independent: 187,837, down 18.3 per cent

The Times: 576,185, down 6.0 per cent

Daily Mirror: 1,324,883, down 9 per cent

Daily Record: 347,302, down 11 per cent

Daily Star: 886,814, up 18 per cent

The Sun: 3,128,501, down 1 per cent

Daily Express: 730,234, down 2.5 per cent

Daily Mail: 2,171,686, down 3.9 per cent

Sunday Papers:

Independent on Sunday: 160,809, down 18.3 per cent

The Observer: 361,761, down 12 per cent

The Sunday Telegraph: 599,131, down 3.1 per cent

The Sunday Times: 1,164,831, down 0.72 per cent

Daily Star Sunday: 401,305, down 0.6 per cent

News of the World: 3,120,991, down 3.99 per cent

Sunday Mail: 428,613, down 11 per cent

Sunday Mirror: 1,237,227, down 5.7 per cent

The People: 586,414, down 9.7 per cent

Sunday Express: 646,861, down 1.25 per cent

Sunday Post: 354,870, down 10.4 per cent

Mail on Sunday: 2,013,742, down 7.5 per cent

The Daily Star is the only paper that increased the number of copies sold, mainly because it dropped its cover price to 20p in many parts of the country.

The Sun followed suit, as it also sells around 1.5 million copies a day at the lesser 20p rate. The cost of its basic cover price cut from 35p to 30p and of its further discount to 20p in certain areas is estimated at more than £50m a year in cover price revenue alone.

This affected ‘ Trinity Mirror Group’ national titles, they were evidently feeling the effects of strict cost-cutting which must have impacted on their marketing budgets.

The ‘Independent’ and ‘Independent on Sunday’ are the worst performing papers so much so, that Denis O’Brian, one of the shareholders of Independent News and Media (INM), the multinational company that controls the two titles, wanted to sell them or close them down.

INM is in deep troubles, it failed to pay 200m Euro to its bondholders and now its major shareholder plans to give up half of his shares to the creditors as part of a rescue deal.

As the number of people supporting the BNP keeps rising, the newspaper owners should ask themselves this question. “How wise is it to put these increasing numbers off  buying  newspapers that print anti-Nationalist/BNP stories”?
Even if the prospect of a single newspaper breaking ranks and supporting us is unlikely, surely running more balanced stories would incentivise more people to buy them and reduce their financial problems.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

In what is now a regular summer occurrence, the British National Party held its annual Red White and Blue festival, antifascist groups took part in violent demonstrations aimed at disrupying this family event and mainstream media did their best to portray UAF’s thugs in a positive light and families attending the RWB as a bunch of racist bigots.

The only reason it’s worth looking at these smear articles is to have an idea of the kind of “quality journalism” that Rupert Murdoch and other media bosses think readers should pay to look at online.

In the meantime any BNP supporter that feel upset for the way the RWB has been covered, can take solace in the fact that newspaper circulation dropped again in July. Here the figures provided by Audit Bureau of Circulations (ABC) for July 2009:

The Independent – 189,013 (-19.67%)

The Guardian – 328,773 (2.71%)

The Times – 580,483 (-5.15%)

Daily Telegraph – 818.937 (-4.54%)

Financial Times – 397.600 (6.13%)

The Sunday Times – 1,190,936 (+2.74%)

Independent On Sunday – 160,395 (-19.98%)

The Sunday Telegraph – 602,495 (-2.77%)

The Observer – 398,330 (-7.01%)

Maybe more people are starting to realise that newspapers, far from reporting the truth, give a biased and distorted view of the events. But it seems that their penchant for lies goes far beyond the way they report news and events. According to Press Gazette, the ABC is now revising the circulation figures of 6 newspapers after it emerged that they use bulk sales to airports and airlines to inflate their circulation.

So far the ABC reduced the Daily Mail’s average daily circulation from the previously reported figure of 2,228,897 to 2,200,398 – a reduction of just over 28,000 copies on average each day.

The Mail on Sunday was reduced from a top line circulation of 2,189,432 each week in January to 2,134,809 – a reduction of 54,623.

Once adjusted the Financial Times dropped from its previously reported figure of 432,944 to 426,676.

The Daily Telegraph was reduced from 842,912 to 783,210; the adjusted figure is 59,702 copies lower on average each day.

Its sister paper, the Sunday Telegraph, was reduced from 619,243 to 602,306 – an adjustment of 16,937.

The Evening Standard dropped from the previously reported circulation of 292,976 to 237,403 – an adjustment of 55,573 fewer copies sold each day.

With luck advertisers will make their voice heard, after all they have been deceived and maybe this will translate to less revenue and higher losses.

Hopefully they will pay a huge price for their arrogance.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

BNP Sleazebuster Michael Barnbrook has revealed to London Patriot that he is one of the two original complainants in the Jacqui Smith second home farce.

Michael acted following a report in the Daily Mail which exposed the fact that the Home secretary listed a bedroom in her sister’s house as her main residence and has claimed £116,000 in second home expenses for the home where her family lives in her constituency.

Astoundingly John Lyon, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, said that he would not be pursuing the complaint against Ms Smith despite the fact that only last year he stated ‘If a Member has his or her family living permanently in their constituency home and has modest accommodation in London big enough only for themselves, and which they use only when Parliament is in session, then it would clearly seem to be a matter of fact that Member’s main home is in the constituency.’

Michael Barnbrook takes up the story;

I was one of the two original complainants against Jacqui Smith, having sent in my original complaint on 9th February, 2008, a day after the exposure in the ‘Mail on Sunday.

As expected, Mr John Lyon, the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, wrote to me on 10th February, 2009, informing me that I had not provided him with sufficient evidence that Ms Smith may have broken the rules. (He knows that Members of Parliament, let alone members of the public are unable to provide the necessary evidence because it is confidential) although he has the power to obtain such evidence if he chooses to do so.

I wrote back to Mr Lyon on 11th February, 2009, informing him that I didn’t have to provide any evidence as it was already available to him in the Commons Fees Office.

I also informed Mr Lyon that Jacqui Smith had contravened two of his own rulings that he had laid down in his previous investigation of Ed Balls, MP and Yvette Cooper, MP, as well as ignoring a precedent set out by his predecessor, Sir Philip Mawer, in the investigation of Michael Trend, relating to the obtaining of evidence.

Mr Lyon has not yet responded to my latest letter but I understand that he has now accepted a complaint from a neighbour relating to how often Jaqcui Smith stayed at her sister’s house in London. This fact is irrelevant in Jacqui Smith’s case as Mr Lyon has set a new precedent which is mentioned in my letter of 11th February.

I have no doubt in my own mind that the real reason Mr Lyon is investigating Jacqui Smith is as a result of my second letter to him, although he would not give me the credit as I had signed it as a Parliamentary Candidate for the British National Party.

Can you imagine the shame of a Labour Minister being brought to task because of the British National Party

We shall find out the truth when he finally responds to me.

In the meantime I am attaching my two letters to Mr Lyon which you can publish if you think it is newsworthy.

Kindest regards,

Mick Barnbrook

Once again Michael has shown that he fully deserves the title BNP Sleazebuster. We congratulate Michael for his efforts and will continue to report on his activities.

Michael’s letters are reproduced in full below.

Share this post:

Hide Sites