Gordon Brown is gone but the damage he and his party have wreaked on this country is still present and most unlikely to disappear.

The list of destructive policies implemented by the previous Labour government is long, but at the top of it is mass immigration, engineered to change the fabric of British society against the wishes of British voters.

One example can be found in a story published by the Daily Mail about an illegal immigrant and convicted fraudster, fighting deportation to the Middle East because he claims it infringes his human rights because he needs regular dialysis for kidney failure.

In a move that critics said underlined the chaos of Britain’s asylum system under Labour, it emerged that he is being put up in a nursing home at a cost to the taxpayer of £700-a-week.

Mashal Almansour, 38, who has already had an unsuccessful kidney transplant on the NHS, was jailed for three years after conning banks and building societies out of £800,000 in a sophisticated mortgage scam.

He used the money to fund an enviable lifestyle, enjoying luxury cars and comfortable homes, but following his conviction he claims to have lost the lot.

Now suffering from kidney failure, he is fighting deportation back to Jordan on the grounds that it would infringe his human rights.

Almansour claims he wouldn’t be able to afford three-times-a-week dialysis in his native country and would die within weeks.

His battle to avoid deportation is also likely to be aided by public funds, and his case will add to fears that Labour’s pledge of getting tough on foreign criminals is not being met.

Shortly after becoming Prime Minister, Gordon Brown warned them that ‘if you commit a crime you will be deported’, declaring: ‘You play by the rules or you face the consequences.’

Last night, critics said it was outrageous that a convicted conman with no right to be in Britain could receive so much support.

Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘This is a huge cost, week on week, and local taxpayers are forking out for it.

‘Many local authorities’ budgets are stretched right now.

‘Members of the public will be angry that Mr Almansour is in this country illegally, benefiting from taxpayer-funded care, despite the fact that he has ripped off taxpayers with his criminal behaviour.’

Almansour came to Britain 14 years ago and applied for citizenship. But he withdrew his application and has lived here illegally ever since.

He worked as a delivery driver and a takeaway worker before starting his own mortgage firm, using a string of false names to rip off banks and building societies for thousands of pounds.

Jailing him for three years in 2007 at Bradford Crown Court, Judge James Spencer QC called the scam a ‘cynical manipulation’ and said Almansour was guilty of ‘serious criminal dishonesty’.

Home Office officials began deportation proceedings when Almansour – whose marriage to a British woman collapsed following his conviction – was released from jail after 18 months.

Speaking yesterday at his nursing home in Stockport, Almansour said: ‘My main concern is that Jordan is not my home.

‘I do not have family or friends. Without dialysis, the doctors say I would die within a few weeks.

‘If I am sent back it will be a death sentence.’

Almansour also claims he has not lived in Jordan long enough to be eligible for scarce state-funded treatment there.

His friend Carol Wilde added: ‘He made a mistake and got greedy. It was a mistake and he paid his time for it.’

The UK Borders Agency said only the most seriously ill illegal immigrants could stay on compassionate grounds.

A spokesman said: ‘Before deportation takes place there is a right of appeal to an independent tribunal who will consider whether removal is appropriate.’

Stockport council, which is footing the £700-a-week nursing home bill, said it had a legal obligation to step in.

Last night a spokesman said: ‘Under the National Assistance Act the council has a legal duty in certain circumstances, for example an unheard appeal on the grounds of human rights, to assist people who have no recourse to public funds.’

How many old people are dying every year in Stockport because they cannot afford to pay for heating and eating?

We would be interested to know but don’t hold your breath, after all under Labour, people who shouldn’t be here in the first place have more rights and more assistance than Britons who were born here and paid taxes all their life.

Stories like these explain why we got 576,000 votes in the last general and local elections and why we are now the 4th biggest party in Britain.

We are here to stay and to fight for what we think is right and to offer a fair society to British people.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The abiding dream of all nationalist’ is to close our borders, kick out illegal immigrants, stop giving benefits and council houses to asylum seekers and give incentives to legal immigrants to go back to their home countries.

Will anyone from the mainstream media support those policies? No of course not!

We know the answer to immigration, and apparently it is dawning on some liberal journalists in the USA  at last!

This is why I decided to present for nationalists’ delectation and delight a commentary published in ‘The Bulletin’, a Philadelphia based newspaper.

The author of this piece Jim Wiles, is robust in his hatred of the British National Party, but in his article he shows his thinking is in line with the policies of his target of scorn; it contains a lot of common sense, such common sense as would be unthinkable in the UK MSM.

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/12/12/commentary/op-eds/doc4b23fa9caa66e460370513.txt

Have you noticed the Mexicans are going home? Some are trying to tough it out – and apparently even asking for help from home, but the trend line in illegal immigration to the United States is definitely down.

It’s particularly noticeable here on the Redneck Riviera. In 2005 – 2006, the Grand Strand was one of the four fastest-growing areas in the country.

Illegal immigrants swarmed on construction sites and in all sorts of outdoor work. Food carts and local Mexican restaurants offered regional specialties. Lowes and McDonald’s had bilingual signs. The old day laborer market for local African Americans had disappeared, replaced by Hispanics.

One night, pulling out of the Food Lion two blocks from my parents’ house, I saw a scary sight: a Mexican mom, baby in one hand, handlebar in the other, pushing out into rush hour traffic to take the groceries — safely strapped into the baby seat — home. I followed her, running interference with my car, until she’d turned safely into her driveway.

She didn’t have a hand free to wave. But her smile lit up the night.

That was then. With the bursting of the boom, she’s gone. So’s the day laborer market. Gone, too, this summer, were the armies of Eastern European students who had worked here the previous two years in the hospitality and retail industries.

The current economic debacle, thus, contains within it at least one pearl: a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rectify our illegal immigration problem in a humane way.

In this 24-hour news cycle, we seem able only to focus on one story at a time. Yet, the illegal immigration story has not gone away. It’s still right there, festering.

This is important because illegal immigration is one of those “intractable” problems, which is destroying the legitimacy of America’s government. It’s not intractable. Our rulers, whatever their party, simply don’t want to stop illegal immigration.

A majority of the American people disagree – strongly. Today, with 10 percent unemployment, that disagreement is stronger than ever.

This gap between voters and their elected representatives exists in far worse form in Europe. One example is the European Union (E.U.) itself, opposed by most voters, but implemented anyway.

The most recent example is the Swiss referendum held two weeks ago. Fifty seven percent of Swiss voters supported a ban on construction of new minarets. The response of political leaders across Western Europe? To condemn this expression of the popular will and to fervently hope that the European Human Rights Court will strike it down.

In today’s Western Europe, nationalism has become the virtue, which dare not speak its name.

The Swiss vote came on the heels of the revelation that the wave of Muslim and other non-white immigration into the United Kingdom since the coming of Tony Blair and the Labor Party to power in 1997 was not, as most had thought, the result of government incompetence. It was a deliberate policy. The Laborites sought to change the U.K.’s racial and religious complexion to help achieve their goal of de-constructing British society.

Even with that bombshell, British Conservatives won’t touch immigration. So, is it any wonder, then, that some voters are turning to the neo-fascist British National Party, which promises to “guarantee that Britain remains British?” As I’ve noted here before, the re-emergence of such parties in Europe is the direct result of elected leaders repeatedly overriding the voters’ wishes.

Here, in the U.S., happily, we have the opposite of voter apathy: a full blown, populist rebellion. But, in all of the hullabaloo, the illegal immigration issue has, so far, gotten dropped by the wayside.

It’s clear that, like Britain’s Labor Party, the Obama Democrats view illegal immigration as in their political interest. Why else the repeated trumpeting this year that conservatives are going to end up on the ash heap of history because America’s demographic makeup is changing? And yet, like the Tories, the GOP is gun-shy about the illegal immigration issue.

In Italy, the government is offering money to illegal immigrants willing to be returned to their countries of origin.

Something like that might be a modest, first step towards tackling America’s illegal immigration problem. It would also immediately begin making private sector jobs available to unemployed Americans. According to recent press reports, it’s not just Hispanics anymore down at the day laborer line at Home Depot and Lowes.

They are people you and I know.

Jim Wiles is a Philadelphia lawyer. He can be reached at jwiles@thebulletin.us

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Illegal immigrant Victor Okumu was today jailed for 13 years after being found guilty of a terrifying robbery during which a mother and her three year old daughter were held at gun point.

The Harrow Times reports that “the 26-year-old now faces deportation when he is eventually released”. Regular readers of the BNP web sites will not be holding their breath whilst waiting for that to happen.

More likely Okumu will be held comfortably in prison for while serving out his sentence (or maybe half of it). His every need will be catered for and he will eat better than many poor pensioners are able to.

On release it will no doubt be claimed that to return him to his country of origin is a breach of his human rights and he will be allowed to stay in soft touch Britain.

A cynical view or a logical assumption based on past cases? Our readers will know the answer all too well.

Share