It is reported that the Home Secretary will be imposing a strict limit on the number of non-EU work permits to be handed out, and it is expected to lead to a sharp reduction in the more than 100,000 migrants and family members who are told they can work here each year.

The cap is being forced through despite protests from some Tory Cabinet ministers, (I wonder how many lobbyists are pushing the Ministers?) they claim it could hit the profits of UK business and Universities.

So is government finally listening to people?

Of course not, there are so many loopholes immigrants can use to sneak in, such as inter-company transfers where big companies move staff from one country to another.

Also there is no mention of new measures to prevent ‘asylum’ seekers coming into the UK, and no indication that the million or so illegal immigrants/asylum seekers (there is no such thing as a legal asylum seeker) living in the UK will be kicked out.

This is hardly surprising as we have pointed out before, immigration and asylum policies are now decided by the EU and Theresa May must accept the will of the unelected EU bureaucrats.

And there is nothing we can do to prevent those with an EU passport coming here, one example being the hundreds of thousand Poles who migrated to the UK for economic reasons (All Balkan states are allowed to work here, Balkanisation by design).

In the last few months as the financial crisis deepened, and it has become harder to find employment in the UK, thousands of Poles left Britain but a study suggests they found the situation to be far worse in their homeland, and around a third could be about to travel for a second time.

One in three of those interviewed by the Polish research company ISQ said that they wanted to work abroad again.

Dr Dorota Wiszejko-Wierzbicka, author of the study, said the relative wealth and the hard economic climate in Poland lay behind the desire to migrate.

“They know that not only is there better pay abroad but there are also more jobs,” she said.

“In Poland barely a third of the returnees surveyed by us have a steady job, and many complain of a hostile Polish labour market. No wonder then that one-third want to leave again.”

Poland weathered the global recession with reasonable success, and it was the only EU country to record economic growth last year.

But it is still plagued by an unemployment rate of 12.3 per cent, and this figure rises to more than 20 per cent in the small towns and rural areas that are home to many of those contemplating packing their bags for a second time.

The results of the ISQ study are supported by similar research carried out in south-western Poland, which found that large numbers or returnees had little or no desire to remain in the country.

Bartosz Trzaskalski, from the Centre for Strategic Consulting and author of the study, said: “With us we found that up to half of the returnees announced that once again they will be leaving for a job abroad within the next two years.”

But the news that Poles coming home after working abroad have trouble finding jobs and settling down will also renew fears in Poland of what demographers and economists have dubbed the “lost generation”.

Having spent many years working in menial jobs in the UK, and now with no skills suitable for the Polish market, economists fear they will become a burden on the Polish state.

Britain absorbed the vast majority of the hundreds of thousands who left Poland after EU accession in May 2004.

It’s not difficult to foresee a new wave of Polish immigration, even if there are no jobs available, because they can still claim benefits and get free health care.

So much for the Tories putting a cap on immigration.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

We showed a video the from Richard Barnbrook and Chris Roberts a few days ago explaining how Boris Johnson had betrayed Black cab drivers.

This should surprise nobody, after all the Mayor of London is campaigning for an amnesty for the one million or so illegal immigrants living in London and therefore he doesn’t care about native Britons.

And he is not alone.

Canterbury, Kent, is at the centre of a foreign jobs row after a local taxi boss admitted hiring 54 drivers from 42 different countries.

According to an article published by the Daily Express only six of the 60-strong workforce at Cab Co are from the UK.

The rest come from nations as diverse as Afghanistan, Albania, ­Brazil, Bulgaria, Cyprus, China, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia and Spain.

The firm’s boss, Robert Jones, said his foreign drivers are better workers than the English.

“That’s the big difference,” said Mr Jones, “The Englishman comes to work, gets to a certain level and goes home.

“He doesn’t want to work any more than that. They’re more than happy to be getting home.

“But the foreign boys will carry on.

“If there’s a job, they’ll do it.”

He said he employs drivers from “all over the place”, not just EU countries, and that his local council vets all their visas before licences are issued.

British drivers say they have ­suffered a devastating fall in fares after the influx of migrant cabbies.

Independent driver Chris Olding claims the foreign “invasion” had cost locals £300 a week in fares.

“It’s not the recession, it’s the new drivers,” he said.

“There are more and more coming from Eastern Europe.”

Immigration watchdogs branded the trend typical of how working ­conditions were becoming intolerable for British workers.

Sir Andrew Green, chairman of MigrationWatch UK, said: “This is a clear example of how working ­conditions for many British workers are deteriorating. They are facing competition from immigrant workers who can afford to work for less or longer hours.

“It is no wonder employers and organisations are so keen on ­immigration – it’s good for profits but not for British workers.”

Dave Spearman, a driver in Canterbury for 15 years, added: “It’s like the United Nations these days – you’ve got boys from Poland, Turkey, Lithuania, you name it.

“I’m not having a go at them ­personally. All the fellas get on really well. It’s just hard to earn a decent wage with so many coming in.”

Colin Mitchell, a driver in the city for 20 years, said: “I also blame the council for approving their licences.”

He claimed that he made £900 a week two years ago but that his takings have now gone down to £600 or £700 a week at best since the arrival of migrant drivers began to impact on his trade.

By contrast, the foreign drivers are said to be raking in up to £1,000 a week. But to do so they regularly work for longer than 70 hours a week.

Turkish driver Mustafa Ustabas said: “It’s an open market.

“If you are willing to work and can work legally, then nobody has the right to stop you.

“Robert Jones is only looking out for himself.

“I can understand from his point of view. He makes more money.”

Canterbury city council spokesman said: “All licensed taxi drivers have either a British passport or a permit to live and work here.

“If someone is legally entitled to a licence then they can have one and there is no cap on the number of licences issued.”

Once again the interest of British workers have been sacrificed to appease the greed of ruthless employers.

Nationalists can see again yet again the usual argument that foreigners are more hard working than Britons is used to justify mass immigration.

There are two aspects to this story.

The first is about morality.

Whereas no one condone idleness and laziness, the fact is that people are not machines and it’s reasonable for workers to expect to work only a certain amount of hours so they can have time to enjoy themselves with their families.

Treating workers with contempt because they refuse to work long hours is clearly unacceptable, especially when the reason for long hours is to make rich employers richer and fatter.

But there is also a health and safety issue here.

Apparently there are drivers who work more than 70 hours a week.

How safe is a passenger if the driver who picks him/her up works more than 12 hours a day?

Surely those drivers that work 12 hour shifts lose concentration and are more likely to be involved in car accidents because they are tired.

This is another example of the negative effects of mass immigration and the misery it’s causing to British workers.

The only positive aspect is that those betrayed cabbies may become BNP supporters and it may help us to get the first BNP councillor elected to Canterbury City Council next year.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The indigenous French are a declining minority in many parts of France, in the main due to mass immigration and a higher birth rate among immigrants.

It has never been possible to get the exact figures, given that in France statistics about ethnicity are secret.

However someone has managed to find out how to get these hidden stats, and reveal just how many black people there are in any given region.

They looked at the number of babies at risk of drepanocytosis, a genetic illness that affects only Blacks.

We now for the first time a study published revealing how many blacks are living in a given region.

To look at the figures, follow this link:

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/05/first-ethnic-statistics-ever-published-in-france-reveal-54-of-babies-born-in-paris-are-black/

and to learn more about drepanocytosis:

http://medicindo.blogspot.com/2009/02/drepanocytosis.html

Maybe someone should submit FOI requests to an NHS trust asking how many people are at risk of drepanocytosis in the area covered by that NSH trust and therefore obtain a more accurate figure of the immigrant population in the UK.

Not only would those figures be more up to date that the ones given by the census but they may include some thousands of illegal immigrants the official figures ignore.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

In the words of  the German Chancellor Angela Merkel: if the Euro fails, Europe fails. It sounds almost as a forerunner of the end of the European Union. This preceded the collapse of the Euro that reached a record low compared to the US dollar at 1.21 and also led to the fall of the Pound compared to the dollar oscillating at 1.40.

For Britain, June 22nd, 2010, might end up being the final curtain with the so called Emergency Budget that sounds very much like a budget for Britain at War when the country will have to face the harsh realities of having had a Marxist government for more than thirteen years, a Marxist government that flooded the country with immigrants and illegal immigrants and created a massive public debt that is a world record.

When things come to the crunch, the country will suddenly wake up to the realities of having an unsustainable Welfare State used to finance flood immigration, including illegal immigrants and pretend refugees. Many people ask why, in spite of losing power, the Labour Party managed to have control of 17 local authorities in London. The answer is plain and simple: it managed to do it appealing to hundreds of thousands of welfare dependent hordes and non-jobbers.

The collapse of the economies in Europe might lead to a return to common sense politics, but in the process it might lead to Rivers of Blood. We are sailing through uncharted waters, aren’t we? Well, not really. It has happened before with tragic consequences. I am a believer in History Chemistry. If you combine the same factors in similar quantities, you get similar results.

Confrontational Trade Unions will be the trigger and countries will become polarized. If governments do not act promptly to curb the power of the Trade Unions, we are going to run out of peaceful choices. As inflation sky rockets, all the Head of the Bank of England can do is to write letters to the Government while watching a Greek tragedy unfold on British soil.

Share

The three main political parties keep ignoring voters concerns about immigration, The Daily Star has an article detailing how much of the British taxpayers money is spent on people who are not supposed to be here in the first place.

According to the Daily Star, violent illegal immigrants cost us £8million a year because we can’t get rid of them.

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/132923/We-pay-8m-bill-as-migrants-fight-back/

Border Agency staff abandon attempts to deport foreigners if they become aggressive. And in 18 months, 1,118 people became so violent it was deemed unsafe to escort them out the UK.
The National Audit Office figures show immigrants get violent at their holding centre, or are hauled off planes because the pilot becomes concerned for other passengers.
The largest numbers of offenders come from Nigeria, Turkey, China, Cameroon and Pakistan.
Each deportation costs £11,000, whether it is successful or not.
Matthew Elliott of the TaxPayers’ Alliance said: “It’s disgraceful these fudged deportations cost so much. If someone is violent it’s all the more reason to deport them quickly.”
Meanwhile, the Lib Dems’ proposed amnesty on illegals would cost Britain £100billion in a generation, with think-tank MigrationWatch warning 1.1million could cash in.
Chairman Sir Andrew Green said: “It is crazy to suggest these sums should be spent rewarding people who have been breaking our laws.”

We must not forget that one of the strongest supporters of an amnesty for illegals is the Mayor of London Boris Johnson, thus proving that the Tories are as bad as Labour and the Lib-Dems.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

In a strange twist of fate, the day after the BNP Chairman Nick Griffin presented the party’ manifesto that, among many other things, called for a halt to immigration and for the expulsion of illegal immigrants, in Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed a controversial new immigration law on Friday

Before and after Senate Bill 1070 became law at 1:30 p.m civil unrest, punctuated by loud protests and several minor clashes took place at the state Capitol, where more than 1,500 people gathered to chant, pray and either praise or castigate the Republican governor.

At least four protesters were arrested, several after hurling water bottles at police officers in riot gear.

Brewer, who faces a stiff primary challenge and needs conservatives to keep her in office, said the law represents another tool for the state to “work to solve a crisis we did not create and the federal government has refused to fix – the crisis caused by illegal immigration and Arizona’s porous border.”

The legislation put Arizona in the national spotlight, with President Barack Obama weighing in on it earlier in the day and cable-news giant CNN broadcasting live Brewer’s signing and the Capitol demonstrations.

Even the Mexican government issued a formal statement, saying it “laments that Arizona lawmakers and the executive branch didn’t take into account immigrants’ contributions – economically, socially and culturally.”

“The criminalization isn’t the path to resolve the undocumented-immigration phenomenon,” the statement added.

The legislation has widespread support among Arizonans, according to one recent poll, but Latino leaders compared the bill to apartheid in South Africa and the internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II. A handful of teenage girls, among the hundreds of high-school students attending a Statehouse rally, openly wept after it was announced that Brewer signed the bill.

“This is the most reprehensible thing since the Japanese internment,” said Alfredo Gutierrez, a former state senator and community leader. “This is the saddest day for me. It’s shameful.”

Arizona’s immigration law, now considered the toughest in the nation, makes it a state crime to be in the country illegally and requires local police to enforce federal immigration laws. It will require anyone whom police suspect of being in the country illegally to produce “an alien registration document,” such as a green card or other proof of citizenship, such as a passport or Arizona driver’s license.

It also makes it illegal to impede the flow of traffic by picking up day laborers for work. A day laborer who gets picked up for work, and traffic is impeded in the process, would also be committing a criminal act.

The law goes into effect 90 days after the current legislative session ends, likely in early May.

Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, the bill’s sponsor, called it “a good day for America,” saying the law is reasonable.

After receiving intense pressure from both sides during the past week, the governor stepped to a lectern in a crowded room near the Capitol and said she would sign SB 1070 into law.

“This bill strengthens the laws of our state, protects all of us, every Arizona citizen,” she said. “It does so while ensuring that the constitutional rights of all remain solid, stable.”

Brewer said that she listened patiently to supporters and opponents and that, although “many people disagree, I firmly believe it represents what’s best for Arizona.” She criticized the federal government for a lack of action to secure the border, and she said her signature provided “security within our borders.”

“We cannot sacrifice our safety to the murderous greed of drug cartels,” Brewer said. “We cannot stand idly by as drophouses, kidnappings and violence compromise our quality of life.”

Brewer insisted that protections built into the bill and training she has requested from the Arizona Peace Officer Standards and Training Board will protect citizens against discrimination based on race or color. Yet law enforcement has been split over the bill, with many rank-and-file officer groups supporting it and the police chiefs association opposing it.

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio is among the supporters who believe it will give officers more tools to detain illegal immigrants.

Critics suggest the law opens the door for police to make unreasonable stops based on skin color or a lack of English fluency if there’s probable cause to believe someone is in America illegally.

“We’ve got some very serious crime problems out there, and this bill does not address them. It does not give us tools to go after criminals that are part of the cartels,” said Attorney General Terry Goddard, a Democrat who is running for governor.

The faith community also weighed in, with clergy criticizing the law and calling for calm.

Inside a chapel at Queen of Peace in Mesa, a congregation gathered for a monthly healing Mass.

Father Charlie Goraieb comforted his congregation, saying in Spanish, “It’s going to be all right.”

His parish is 60 percent Latino.

“It’s a terrible situation and a reflection of fear and overreaction and total loss of perspective and how we are as a people and as a nation,” he said before Mass.

Josefina Martinez, 56, of Phoenix, said, “I lived here for 25 years. I never had to deal with this. It’s not fair.”

Earlier in the day, Rabbi Maynard Bell, the Arizona office of the American Jewish Committee’s area director, said the law makes a laughingstock of the state and does nothing to make the border with Mexico more secure.

“It’s going to cost the state economically. It’s going to tarnish the state’s image. It’s a lamentable day for Arizona,” Bell said. “I don’t think it will stand up to legal tests.”

Just after Brewer signed the bill, opponents promised legal and economic fights.

Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon said he will ask the City Council on Tuesday to consider suing the state on grounds the new immigration law is unconstitutional and unenforceable.

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, a civil-rights group, promised to fight implementation of the law by challenging its constitutionality. But the ACLU said the timing and strategy have to be worked out.

“We are definitely planning on filing a lawsuit,” said Alessandra Soler Meetze, the group’s Arizona executive director. “This is a direct attempt by Arizona to regulate immigration laws. And it’s forbidden by the federal government.”

Bill opponent Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix, said that the legislation violates the rights of all Arizonans and that a legal team will seek an injunction to keep the law from being implemented.

Gutierrez said he will lead efforts for economic sanctions against Arizona. He declined to disclose details, but one proposed sanction would include boycotts by out-of-state tourists.

At the Capitol, demonstrators exchanged catcalls after Brewer’s announcement, and roughly 80 police officers from the Capitol Police, the state Department of Public Safety and the Phoenix Police Department
worked to maintain order.

There were at least two breakouts of unruly behavior. One occurred when a white-haired man with a beard agitated demonstrators opposing the bill. Police tried to calm the crowd as it closed around the man, who was escorted away. Dozens of demonstrators ran into the streets, and police formed a long human barrier on West Jefferson Street just south of the Capitol complex.

Amid shouting and chanting all day, police made sure the sides were separated. Supporters of the bill stayed in the courtyard between the House and Senate buildings, guarded by police and roped off with police tape.

Supporter Terry Irish of Chandler was elated when Brewer announced her decision.

“This thing wouldn’t be happening if they had sealed our borders,” Irish said.

Those leading the rally urged protesters to follow the example of civil-rights leader Cesar Chavez, who in 1972 led the unionization of farmworkers in direct opposition to Arizona law. They also urged peaceful opposition, and despite several flare-ups, no serious injuries were reported.

In southern Arizona, however, U.S. Rep. Raúl Grijalva, who opposed the law, closed his offices at noon after receiving multiple threats.

Arizona has about 460,000 undocumented immigrants, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Currently, immigration offenses are violations of federal law, something most local law-enforcement agencies cannot enforce.

Pearce, the Mesa Republican, has been working with groups across the state and nation for years to craft legislation that would toughen enforcement.

USA, like Britain, has a problem with immigration and a government who want to swamp the country with newcomers against the will of voters.

However unlike Britain in the USA states have huge powers and can implement policies that are opposed by federal government, and this is what Arizona did.

Unfortunately it’s not clear if this law will remain unchanged as it’s likely to be challenged in the USA Supreme Court on the grounds that states do not have the power to legislate on immigration.

Whatever the outcome, what matters for nationalists is that American, like British citizens, are starting to wake up and fight to get their country back.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Gordon Brown  must think that voters are useless idiots.

In a speech delivered in East London the PM promised a controlled and fairer immigration system and acknowledged that voters are right to be concerned, and I think he really expects us to believe him.

This is the same Gordon Brown who in 2000, according to recently disclosed documents, together with other Labour party’ ministers planned to swamp Britain with a mass immigration in order to change our social structure, and bring them a huge pool of potential Labour voters.

To add insult to the injury, his party has passed dozens of anti-racism laws that make any criticism of immigration or multiracialism a criminal offence.

He has ignored the concerns of the people for 13 years, and denied the public a debate on this topic, he is trying to give the impression that NuLabour has learned from its mistakes and he and his Fabian fellow travellers are starting to listen to people.

We all know that the PM is committed to controlling immigration; in the same way that Pete Doherty is serious about kicking his drug addiction, Boy George giving up gay sex, and the UAF ending its politically motivated violence programme.

This is why many political commentators are urging David (mini me Tony) Cameron to make clear his plan to reduce immigration in order to prevent the British National Party capitalising on the issue.

Unfortunately for them the Conservatives do not have a credible plan, and it is not just because they fear accusations of racism.

Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, strongly supports an amnesty for the one million or so illegal immigrants living in the UK.

So far no one in the Tory party has distanced themselves from him and this shows that David Cameron and the Tories support BoJo and his amnesty scheme.

So far the only thing we know about the Conservatives is that they want a cap in the number of immigrants allowed in the UK.

It sounds good except that under the Lisbon Treaty it is the EU that has the last word on immigration and asylum and therefore nothing can be done without the approval of the EU bureaucrats.

That is why anyone expecting the Tories to offer a sensible alternative will be disappointed.

Are we nationalists surprised?

Of course not.

Let’s not forget Gordon Brown reneged on his promise to give UK voters a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty and the same can be said for the “Cast Iron Guarantee” of the Conservatives.

Unfortunately for them they think the voters are idiots, fortunately for us the voters are only asleep; and this is why support for the British National Party is increasing despite the machinations of the establishment to prevent our growth.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Boris Johnson never ceases to amaze me!!

Just when nationalists thought the Tory party was adopting a tough line on immigration, in their effort to steal votes from the British National Party, Mr Johnson does a hatchet job on his party, this will remind voters that the Tory party is a carbon copy of Labour, and like the latter, it is committed to unlimited mass immigration in order to destroy our Kingdoms and make Britain a ‘multiracial’ country.

Bo Jo has launched a scheme to give all refugees English lessons to help them find jobs (what jobs?).

Mr Johnson is committed to giving an amnesty to illegal immigrants, and asks native Britons to fast for one day during Ramadam (but, of course, never asked Muslims to spend a day in a Christian church to better understand of our culture).

The strategy, called London Enriched, is designed to help those seeking asylum to integrate and find employment. A special migration board, headed by deputy mayor Richard Barnes, will lobby for better provision of ESOL, English lessons for speakers of other languages, across London.

Mr Johnson said: “It is imperative that refugees learn English as soon as possible to ease their integration into London life. Without it, they face immense barriers to gaining employment and further education, the necessary tools that will enable them to fully function and contribute (sic) to society.

“London is a great, teeming cosmopolis of talent and my ancestors benefited from being able to come to this great city and I’m very proud of that. We don’t want to become a society that is hostile to the talent and energy people can offer.

“Refugees bring skills, experience, knowledge and often an entrepreneurial spirit that can make a vital contribution to London’s economy.

“But it must be a two-way street, built on positive engagement by both refugees and settled communities for the benefit of all Londoners.”

Called the London Strategic Migration Partnership, the board plans to ensure all refugees have access to appropriate tuition, improving their ability to find jobs by promoting training and skills.(Another bloody ‘Quango‘)

It also will ensure that the police and justice system deliver high-quality services, and that refugee children are given the same (preferential) opportunities as their peers.

The board will work closely with the London Skills Council, which provides funding for ESOL through the Government’s adult learning budget.

It will make sure funds are directed to those parts of London with high demand (and NuLab voters), such as Tower Hamlets where budget cuts have caused concern over services available.

Donna Covey, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: “We’re very pleased the Mayor recognises the huge contribution refugees make to London, and how important it is that there is a strategy to ensure they are able to continue to do so. The process of integration starts from the moment a refugee arrives here. We look forward to working with him to ensure that there are enough opportunities for refugees to learn English, look for work, and rebuild their lives as part of thriving, successful communities.”

We would like to know how much this scheme is going go cost and why there are no plans to help the huge number of long-term British-born unemployed living in London.

The only bright side is that Mr Johnson is doing a damn good job convincing the indigenous that voting Tory is useless and the white working class abandoned by Labour will see the BNP as the only party who cares for them.

If this is what our government and the other parties plan to do in their deluded efforts to reconnect with voters, our chances of getting control of Barking & Dagenham can only get better.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

We have said it before, some African politicians have more common sense than our elected representatives in Westminster.

Kenya has taken steps to secure its borders, three weeks after a security threat on the Sudan border led to an exchange of fire with militiamen.

An inter-ministerial team made the decision to secure the borders days after reports of encroachment on Kenyan territory in Nadapal, Turkana.

Officers from the Sudan People’s Liberation Army are said to have a camp seven kilometres into Kenyan territory

And Uganda People’s Defence Force (UPDF) soldiers are occupying parts of Kenya — on Migingo Island and on the Kenya/Uganda border in Turkana area.

The security forces have already established camps in Nadapal and other areas on the Kenya/Uganda and Kenya/Somalia borders to ensure that no part of the country is occupied by foreigners.

The decision comes in the wake of reports that the AP had set up a border patrol unit. The unit will be equipped with helicopters, boats, high frequency communication and patrol vehicles.

“We have, unfortunately, been ignoring to secure our borders and we have paid the price for that. However, it has been decided that all borders should be secured to avoid incidents like the Nadapal one,” said a senior Internal Security ministry official, who requested anonymity because of the sensitive nature of the matter.

The government, which deploys the Administration Police’s Rural Border Patrol Unit, the General Service Unit and the military, want to secure border points at all actual boundaries.

A Kenyan technical team comprising officers from Immigration, Customs and Lands departments has already visited the border area to prepare for the establishment of their offices on the Kenyan side.

Of course it’s important to bear in mind that Kenya is surrounded by countries ravaged by civil war but they have other things in common with the UK.

We all now about Sangatte,  illegal immigrants, and bogus asylum seekers camping there in order to get into the UK and take advantage of our housing and benefits system.

Those aliens are ready to use violence to get here, too many lorry drivers have been threatened and attacked.

Nationalists know the UK Border Agency is completely useless and controls are almost non-existent.

Maybe immigration officers should take example from Uganda where cross boarder passenger transporters risk being fined $2,500 (about sh4.7m) per illegal immigrant brought into the country.

“This is one of the deterrent measures the internal affairs ministry has devised to curb the current massive entry of illegal immigrants into the country,” Eunice Kisembo, the immigration directorate spokesperson, said.

She said the measure would force transport companies to always scrutinise clients’ travel documents to ascertain their immigration status.

She added that most transporters do not scrutinise the clients’ immigration status, but were only interested in money.

“We are executing these regulations in line with the required standards of the International Civil Aviation Organisation.” However, she added that the measure would also cover road and sea transporters.

The Uganda Citizenship and Immigration Control Act provides for prosecution of the owner, agent or a person in charge of a ship, an aircraft or a vehicle, who brings in an illegal person.

Those stories demonstrate that even at a time of unprecedented mass movement of people, border control is still possible.

After all if cash-strapped developing countries can do it without fancy technologies why can’t Britain?

We don’t need to comment further on that, we know the answer, especially when a government adviser admitted the existence of a plan to make Britain multiracial against the wishes of its native population, and for its own petty wishes.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As a massive smear campaign against the BNP is under way, it’s good to see someone writing a positive article.

Here some important passages:

Voters will probably try to comfort themselves with the knowledge that Labour will not win the next General Election and we will have a “new” party with “fresh” ideas.

Unfortunately, it makes no difference which of the main parties gain power, as they all have the same masters. In Britain, as in the US, the voters are given two parties to choose from, this is to give the public an illusion of choice. It does not matter to the power brokers who win, as they control both.

In order for this system to work, the public are forced into a “heads or tails” situation, any other potential candidates are discredited by the usual players, with the help of the mainstream media who are there to manipulate public opinion.

A good example of this was seen in the US when Ron Paul attempted to become a presidential candidate. Despite a huge following (mainly on the internet), the media deliberately hid his successes from the public, ensuring that his growing popularity would not encourage others to take an interest. He was excluded from poll results and refused access to many important debates.

With the General Election getting nearer, we are seeing similar tactics being used against the BNP (British National Party). Even though the mainstream media tell us that they have no chance of winning the election, they still feel it is necessary to “blacken” their image (no pun intended). If they really have no chance, why should anyone worry about them at all?

Could it be that the media are misleading us about the popularity of the BNP? Clearly, the number of people who visit their site support this possibility, which seems to attract more visitors than the main parties combined.

The image presented to us of the BNP (by the media and rival parties), is of a political group that resembles the Nazi party or KKK. However, if you were to study their website more closely and examine all the information available, you would most certainly obtain a very different picture.

I was pleasantly surprised to see comments posted on their site by people of different races and colour (supportive of the BNP’s aim). I could give examples of the policies that the BNP would introduce if in power, but it would be better if you visit their site and discover this for yourself.

Are the BNP radical in their views? If reducing (or even stopping) immigration to ease future population problems, racial tension and unemployment is something you consider “radical”, then I guess they are guilty. But can anyone honestly believe that Britain can sustain its current immigration levels and rapidly increasing birth rates?

Reports recently published show that the UK population has topped 61 million for the first time, and whilst immigration has apparently fallen (in respect of Eastern Europeans), there are no figures available for the levels of other immigrants (or any estimate on illegal immigrants).

Perhaps of more interest is the fact that more than half of the births recorded were to women born outside of the UK. According to some statistics, the UK is likely to achieve a population of 70 million within the next 25 years. But if current immigration levels are maintained, along with the birth rate percentages already seen, the figure of 70 million will be achieved much more quickly than that.

Regardless of what your political views are, or which country you originally came from, the population situation is a serious problem that must be confronted sooner, rather than later. This will affect every British citizen, no matter what their colour, race or religion and something must be done.

Whether you agree with all the views presented by the BNP, at the moment they are the only party offering any realistic solution to the problem, and the courage to put this plan into action if elected, something the Conservatives or Labour will not do.

The main political parties have had their chance to get things right, and have failed miserably. The only winners are the big companies who have these politicians in their pockets (who are later rewarded with positions in their companies), but the rest of us have to accept nearly 3 million unemployed and a growing population that we cannot afford.

For years the government has made us all feel guilty about showing our true feelings towards immigrants that are not prepared to accept our traditions, culture and laws. We have created “exceptions” to our laws to cater for certain religious groups, and introduced many new laws that have helped some immigrants to obtain an unfair advantage over others. Is this equality?

How many other countries would be prepared to make such exceptions for immigrants from Britain?

In order to protect the indigenous British people and those who are descendants of foreign-born parents (supportive of traditional British customs and laws); immediate action must be taken to avoid an “overload” of the system. As everyone knows, high unemployment always produces resentment towards immigrants that are seen to be taking their jobs. This is not always the case, but a common reaction.

If unemployment levels continue to remain high, as seems likely, it is inevitable that problems will develop. Surely, it makes sense to tackle this problem before that happens and maintain the harmony that we have enjoyed for so many years.

It might of course help if people (especially the government and media) stopped highlighting the “differences” between British citizens. Why refer to some British people as Black or Asian? If they have a British passport, they are British and all subject to the laws of the land equally (no exceptions!)

How you choose to vote at the next General Election is of course your business, but maybe it is time to forget about voting for a party just because “I always vote for them”, or in your anger choose the next most popular party (according to the media) because you do not want to “waste” your vote. By supporting the current two party system you are wasting your vote and doing exactly what the power brokers expect you to do (and have always done).

Before casting your vote, give some thought to all the soldiers that have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, because of the decision by George Bush and Tony Blair to have a war for oil. Think of all the people who died in the Lockerbie bombing and how the bomber was released to make an oil deal. Remember how all those MP’s cheated you with their expenses claims (not just Labour!) and the lies they told. Do you really want more of that?

Too good to be true?
Yes, in fact this article was published on Newsblaze, an American website.
No one in the British mainstream media will never write something like that, after all the National Union of Journalist clearly state that the BNP must get only negative coverage.
However, thanks to the internet, it’s possible now to go around this Soviet-style censorship and it’s help to explain why many newspapers are almost bankrupt.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Britain is full of problems but it seems our elected representatives in Westminster have nothing better to do that meddling in the debate going on in the USA about healthcare reform.

First we have Gordon and Sara Brown using Twitter to tell Americans how wonderful is the NHS. Then it’s the turn of Tory MEP Dariel Hannan advising people not to copy the dreadful NHS and David Cameron trying to reassure voters that a Tory government will preserve this great institution.

There is a problem in the USA health system, where about 46 millions are without insurance and so unable to get any help if they become sick but as usual politicians and their puppet mainstream media do their best to lie and misinform people.

Let’s start to look who those uninsured are.

According to the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), an organization similar to Migrationwatch, one third of those uninsured are illegal immigrants and their children and it makes this calculation by using figures from the US Census Bureau.

Of course it’s difficult to have reliable information as illegals try their best to avoid being caught but this is not the only study available. In 2005 a study carried out by the Rand Corporation analyzed data received from about 2,400 people in Los Angeles County in 2000 and 2001, and applied that information to the nation’s undocumented population at large.

The number of uninsured adults in the United States grew by about 8.7 million between 1980 and 2000. If the trend for Los Angeles County held true for the rest of the country, about a third of that growth can be attributable to illegal immigrants.

“The study does not diminish the severity of the problem of the uninsured. Nor does it call for some sort of health insurance coverage for illegals” said James Smith, a senior economist at RAND. “That’s not a scientific question. Rather, the study shows that any meaningful impact on reducing the number of uninsured has to take into account the issue of illegal immigration, he said.”

If the CIS can be accused of being biased against immigrants, the same cannot be said for the Rand Corporation and given that illegal immigration increased since the time the study was released, it’s possible that the number of those illegals uninsured increased hugely.

After all, according to the Pew Hispanic Center, 59 percent of all illegal immigrant adults lacked health insurance in 2007. These figures are dramatically higher than the 14 percent uninsured rates for U.S.-born adults. The children of illegal immigrants are also uninsured at extremely high rates — 45 percent of their foreign-born children are uninsured!

On the other hand there are other research centres who give a more conservative estimate. The National Institute for Health Care Management calculates the number of uninsured who are illegal aliens at about 5.6 millions.

Even if the figure is much lower than the CIS’s, it still proves that more than 10% of uninsured are people who are not supposed to be in the USA in the first place.

So if it’s true that many special interest groups are against healthcare reform because they want to maintain the status quo, it’s also true that many ordinary American citizens are strongly opposed to bankrolling a very expensive plan that would advantage illegal immigrants.

But illegal immigration affects Americans indirectly also.

Many aliens tend to go to the emergency rooms when their illness is more advanced and thus more expensive to treat.
Given that very few pay hospitals are left with huge unpaid bills and they make up for those losses by charging more American patients thus increasing insurance premiums and increasing the number of Americans that cannot afford medical coverage.

So here there is another uncomfortable truth about the negative impact of immigration and once again media are concealing it from the public.

USA could hugely reduce the number of uninsured by getting rid of all the illegal immigrants. This of course wouldn’t fix all the problems but would make the reform much more manageable. We know this is the case also in the UK where the NHS spend huge amount of money to give free healthcare to immigrants and asylum seekers while denying treatment to Britons who paid taxes for all their lives.

David Cameron is right when he says the NHS is a great institution but it would be better if he tried to explain how he plans to deal with immigrants putting a lot of strain to our health service.

As for the TORY MEP Daniel Hannan, who claimed the BNP is more far-left than far-right, he should maybe take example from some American conservatives that are supporter of free market economy but strongly opposed to mass immigration.

Share