You might believe that Queen Elizabeth II is also the Head of State of Canada. Well, she isn’t! In reality she is not the Head of State of a country whose citizens lost their lives fighting for Britain in two World Wars and other conflicts. Or is She? Well, given the way Britain treats Canadian citizens, she shouldn’t be.

An elderly gentleman who came to Britain in 1963, got married and raised his children in England where he worked for more than 40 years  and had a company employing British citizens, was treated worse than one of the enrichers that come to Britain to live at the expense of British taxpayers.

Some weeks ago, a member of his family in Canada had to undergo cancer treatment and he went to Canada for obvious reasons. When he came back to London, he was told that he no longer had the right to live in the United Kingdom.

A Canadian lady went to the Home Office to renew her visa and she was told that she had to pay not less than 500 pound (basically almost 600) to have a stamp on her passport and that after paying she had to wait not less than six weeks for the said stamp.

After these lovely experiences, I am sure that these two Canadians will have plenty to tell their friends and relatives about what a wonderful country Britain is.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Richard Edmonds speaking at Bromley and Lewisham branch meet.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We stand to pay a very high price for the Welfare State. Of course the pension system is unsustainable. Of course public services that are falling apart under the weight of flood immigration are unsustainable. A country that has the number of unemployed and fully welfare dependent individuals that Britain has is unsustainable. There are no surprises.

As years go by, those at work are being forced to pay for more and more unemployed individuals and the consequences are clear for all to see. The deterioration and ultimate destruction of the Welfare State is predictable. And then what? Widespread Chaos!

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Twenty percent of adults of working age are out of work. This means one out of five. This is not only a problem for the present. It is a timebomb because  to those who are inactive you have to add hundreds of thousands who are at work, but are not able to save enough money for pensions. The nightmare created by a very irresponsible Labour government has effectively bankrupt Britain.

The future of the British currency does not look brilliant either. One of the key issues of the present and very much of the future is energy or the lack of it and energy in a very competitive world will cost us a lot more with a devalued currency. Our credit rating can be the difference between being able to pay and default. As the crisis worsens, more and more companies are getting rid of final salary schemes and the future of pensions in the public sector looks far from secure.

If you are trying to invest to capitalize your savings, well… with crippling inflation, rising taxes and lower interest rates for your deposits, the chances of those on lower incomes are basically nil. People firstly eat their savings and then get deeper and deeper into credit debt until they reach the limit. The next thing we need to look at is the level of welfare payments. Sixty-four pounds a week does not seem like an awfully big amount of money. Welfare payments look like staying onboard a sinking Titanic.

People need jobs in Britain and they need them now. This is why putting a halt to immigration is so vitally important. Growing population combined with growing unemployment is very much a recipe for disaster. The gap between those who are extremely rich and those who are extremely poor has been growing like never before and this is bound to have serious political consequences. I think immigration is an issue of National Security and I also think that the levels of social disintegration created by demographic mismanagement will be the nuclear bomb of the Twenty-First Century.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Labour ran the country borrowing and spending as if there was no tomorrow. On June 22nd, 2010, we will be told about the so called Emergency Budget – not the budget, not the spring budget, but the Emergency Budget. We face a state of national emergency. While inflation runs at about 6 per cent, once again the Bank of England left the basic rate unchanged at 0.5 per cent and the European Central Bank adopted a similar measure leaving the basic rate unchanged at 1 per cent. We are living in a non-reality, but the announcement has already been made: the monies provided by the Treasury to local authorites across the county will be cut. What does this mean?

It means that local authorities across the country – including those hit by the Icelandic banks crisis will have to confront reality with a depreciated currency – therefore, the income of local authorities will have been reduced both in nominal terms and in real terms.

As unemployment rises, the so called Job Centres also face a very uncertain future and job centres staff will themselves join the dole queues. Reducing bureaucracy is both costly and absolutely necessary to curb the deficit. The so called ‘services sector’, magnified by a suicidal economic policy, will go downhill and more and more people will have to learn that a true economy can only be sustainable with true jobs.

Labour politicians are now talking about ‘excessive immigration’. Well, is this a newlyfound wisdom? Immigration from outside the European Union can be stopped if there is political will to do so, but immigration from inside the European Union could only be stopped by leaving the European Union. No pain, no gain. Whatever the choices, there will be a very high political cost to pay and old loyalties could suddenly vanish.

The British National Party has been saying it all along: Labour policies  are a recipe for disaster. Labour policies combined with flood immigration were going to create the mess they have created. We have a bankrupt country with a macrocephalic state and a hyper-developed welfare system that is feeding flood immigration. They built a paradise for  immigrants and illegal immigrants based on growing public debt.

Reducing the welfare system to a minimal expression can only be a positive thing: When those trying to come to Britain and those who are already in Britain realise that they cannot go on milking the system, living at the expense of taxpayers and producing children that they cannot afford, Britain will be on the way to recovery. Flood immigration and unemployment are directly linked. What do some people need to understand simple mathematics? We could have full employment and public services working at optimum levels, but instead we have got chronic unemployment, a housing crisis, unsafe streets and overcrowded prisons.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

If you believe the MSM you may well think that the British National Party is gone for good.

Well this is not the case, and it may explain why Margaret Hodge, almost a month after she said it is time for BNP members in Barking & Dagenham to pack up and leave. In the Daily Telegraph she feels the need to write an article explaining why the only way to defeat the BNP is through open debate.
[1]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/bnp/7776363/How-to-beat-the-BNP-and-make-sure-they-dont-come-back.html

Nationalists may find her intervention upsetting but the fact that she was forced to write such an article in the first place shows that the BNP are now a political force powerful enough to make the three other parties confront issues like immigration that they have neglected for too long.

Indeed a debate is going on in left-wing circles about the need for Labour to be tougher on immigration.

David Goodhart, editor of Prospect magazine, argues that Labour must become an anti-immigration party and it uses good arguments that should resonate with anyone claiming to represent the interests of the working class.
[2] http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/05/18/labour-must-become-the-anti-immigration-party-david-goodhart/

However the split in the ranks of NuLabour are apparent when we read this from Daniel Trilling in the New Statesman disagreeing from his cloud cuckoo land with Mr Goodhart.

According to Mr Trilling Barking has experienced a relatively low level of immigration compared to the rest of London. And nationally, support for the BNP is strongest in areas with low, rather than high numbers of immigrants. (of course it is strongest in less enriched areas, immigrants won’t vote for the goose that lays the eggs will they you idiot.)
[3] http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/05/immigration-labour-bnp

This position is echoed by Anders Lustgarten, the author of the play “A day at the racists”

According to Mr Lustgarten the cheap labour of some of those people, immigrants, was a key element of New Labour’s “economic miracle”, yet the state never acknowledged the role they played — so when times went bad, nobody remembered what they had done to make them good. Instead, Miliband, Balls, Burnham et al seem intent on scapegoating immigrants to distract us from the real causes of hardship.
[4] http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/05/touch-labour-immigration-shows

Clearly he doesn’t know what the word hardship means but nationalists can take comfort from the fact that those left-wing intellectuals, with all their nonsense words, and detachment from the real world, can only help the cause of nationalism because ordinary people that have suffered 13 years of Labour misrule will surely feel insulted and offended by their claim that immigration is good for them.

Of course Labour will never be tough on immigration or the cause of immigration and will never listen to people, but the fact that such a debate is taking place means that the BNP is becoming more powerful by the day and many in the Labour party are feeling the pressure we are putting on them.

ps: Compare the comments in the Telegraph article and the ones in The New Statesman, even the lefties are worried about mass immigration. We are not going away you Fabianites, you will be exposed for what you are. Traitors!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It is extremely difficult to keep up with the news. After Greece and Portugal, now comes Spain whose credit rating has also been downgraded and the wave is coming closer to home. As the IFS Institute for Fiscal Studies remarked, none of the so called mainstream political parties in Britain has a credible strategy to deal with the deficit and the massive amount of public debt the Labour government has created.

Like in Four Weddings and a Funeral, we have been invited to a wedding party and the next thing we know is that one of the guests has collapsed and died and this could well be an example of what is going to happen after May 6th, 2010. We face a General Election and, during the victory celebrations, we might end up learning that Britain is financially dead.

For as long as we keep borrowing, we will not be able to pay the debt. This means that for as long as we have a deficit, we will not have the money to pay the capital and interest of a massive public debt that will continue rising. We are getting into debt to pay debts.

To my knowledge, Labour’s strategy of flood immigration is suicidal. How can we possibly keep bringing people in when there are no enough jobs and no enough housing units for the ones who are already here? Flood immigration increases the need to borrow ever more money because unemployment will be rising ever faster and the burden on the welfare system and public services will be ever greater. I am not talking about rocket science. This is one plus one equals two.

Protecting the environment? The Labour government and the Green Party, among others, keep talking about higher taxes to reduce emissions. Well, more people will produce more pollution and more degradation of the enviroment. They raise taxes that strangle businesses and destroy jobs and then bring in more people to produce more pollution.

So called mainstream politicians are like the man who told his followers: We are on the edge and facing the abyss. Let’s move a step forward’. They are promising to invest monies that we do not have.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

It seems that Mr. Brown does not have the common touch with the ladies. When he sent a handwritten letter to the mother of a dead soldier, he made a fool of himself. After talking to a lady voter – when he thought nobody was listening – Mr. Brown called her a bigot for asking about immigration.

Does the Prime Minister think that everybody who is concerned about immigration is a bigot? They say 24 hours is a long time in politics. Well, I tend to believe that it is exactly what the Prime Minister and many of his supporters think. But we should ask the Prime Minister over and over again: who are the bigots, Mr. Brown?

Share this post:

Hide Sites

21-year-old Vicky Harrison had three A-levels and 10 GCSEs, but had one major disadvantage. She was British white and after years of search for a job and after more than 200 job applications, life became unbearable because she wanted to work and have a future in her own country. Despite her search for a job, she had been forced to survive on forty or so pounds a week.

When you vote on May 6th, 2010, remember Vicky Harrison and the hundreds of thousands like her who are being treated like dirt in their own country while illegal immigrants and pretend refugees are taking over your houses and your jobs and telling you how to run your own country.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

GDP is the wrong kind of measurement to tell us about the state of the economy because GDP only measures the transfer of cash between different agents in the economy and therefore it is not a measure of wealth creation. The real indicator of wealth is the number of people at work at any point in time and as we learnt unemployment is rising and inflation is rising. Now, let’s look at the figures.

GDP grew by 0.2 per cent and inflation in just one month went from 3 per cent to 3.4 per cent at a time when the basic interest rate remains frozen at 0.5 per cent.

If after the General Election the government is forced to change its policy on inflation management, there is going to be a deadly combination of mass unemployment, rising interest rates and rising taxes at a time when the role of the State as an employer will be seriously contested.  Whoever is in power after May 6th 2010, there will be huge job losses, increasing even more the already massive welfare budget.

There is going to be added pressure on the financial system that is already mostly State owned to deal with rising volumes of bad debts created by unemployment. This is the reality. Before the General Election, they can try and give you a rosy picture, but this is what we are facing.

If positive discrimination was unfair in times of abundance, positive discrimination will have a catastrophic effect when hundreds of thousands are about to lose their jobs. Add to this the fact that, as budget cuts bite, those belonging to Marxist Trade Unions will make their best effort to push out of the State anybody who does not agree with their ideological stances.

But this is not all. By allowing mass immigration, the establishment is increasing the chances of having a war on home soil with people struggling to make ends meet. I sometimes wonder if this isn’t the whole purpose of promoting mass immigration.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

I have been to quite a few places in the world and nobody ever told me that talking about border controls was some kind of racism. In Latin America, it isn’t. In Russia, it isn’t. So Britain must be the only country in the world where even talking about immigration or controlling immigration is racist. Britain used to have a register of people entering the country and/or leaving the country. So the authorities could determine who was in the country at any point in time. Not anymore.

For all we know, Osama bin Laden could come and spend a weekend in Brighton during the summertime and we would be none the wiser. So it is absolutely nonsensical to spend a huge amount of money in National Security when we not even know who is in the country at any given time.

Frank Field, a prominent Labour MP, asks the question: ‘Why is there no talk about immigration?’ ’The economy and immigration are the two big issues that voters wish to see debated at this election’, says Frank Field. I wouldn’t dare to classify Frank Field as some far-right operator, some kind of political extremist. Frank Field is a very knowledgeable and experienced politician with a well established parlamentarian career.

Unfortunately, nowadays, the situation is even worse with civil servants sent to prison for selling British passports to  illegal immigrants and selling British passports has become a business. Other civil servants have been accused of exchanging passports for sexual favours and illegal immigrants have been employed by the Home Office. So this is where we are.  Isn’t it time to have a very serious debate on immigration. I reckon you know the answer.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Dear Fellow Patriot

Now is the time for Action ! In the coming few weeks we need your help. We need your help to fightback against the tyranny of the Labour party and to help us expose the Lib/Lab/con trick. This is not the time to sit on our hands or take our eye off the ball. We must fightback like we have never fought before.

The good news is the mood of our country folk is changing in our favour. Tired of being ignored and pushed to the back of the queue growing numbers of people will be voting BNP at these elections.

To help us make our next breakthrough we will be standing 145 candidates in the London local elections and 33 candidates in the London Parliamentary elections. Officers and members of the Party are literally working full time to ensure that we give the best account of ourselves and that the public are able to vote British National Party. As part of our campaigns branches have been holding meetings, table top sales and leafleting and canvassing sessions around London. The support from the public has truly been overwhelming and we have benefited already by gaining publicity, new members and enquiries. We have also gained a lot of publicity. You will have probably seen in your local press stories about candidates standing and the activities of your local branch. There is no doubt that we are putting the fear of God into the parties which make up the Lib/Lab/Con trick.

We must not waiver. Our next break through will come in Barking and Dagenham with the possibility of taking the Council and the seats of Hodge and Cruddas. In Barking and Dagenham we are standing 34 candidates in the local elections. If you can help out in Barking and Dagenham delivering leaflets or canvassing please contact Richard Barnbrook. 07869243129

With your help during the day and at the weekends we will succeed in taking the council. The council is the prize and once we have shown we can run a council effectively and for the betterment of British people, the Party will again move forward. I must request that all members and supporters do their utmost to help out in Barking & Dagenham. Only by focussing our efforts in Barking & Dagenham and winning can we move forward in London. There is leafleting daily meeting at Becontree Tube Station at 11am and 7pm weekends meet at 11am.

If you are not in touch with your local group, now is the time to get involved and get active. At present we have teenagers and OAPs delivering leaflets day in day out. There is no excuse not to help in some way. If you are able bodied and have time do your bit to help the Party and your country. If you are unsure how to get in touch with your local branch please contact the London Organiser, Bob Bailey on 07742749614 or at london@bnp.org.uk.

On Thursday 15th April, we held a protest outside of Lunar House in Croydon. You may have seen news coverage of the event. We are now setting the agenda and the mainstream political parties are been forced to talk about the immigration shambles and the issues we are campaigning on.

The deadline for the return of nomination papers for Parliamentary candidates is Tuesday 20th April at 4pm. If you have been asked to help out, please give every assistance to your branch and to your candidates. The 20th April is also the deadline for registering to vote. If you are not on the electoral register, now is the time for action.

The last date for the appointment of counting agents, people who will be attending the count or polling agents, people who can go inside a polling station to make sure everything is being conducted properly and put seals on the ballot boxes at the close of poll, local elections is Wednesday 28th April, the General Election is Tuesday 4th May. This is one way to help the Party out and also to take part and enjoy the fun on polling day which is May 6th if you need reminding. Postal votes will be delivered by councils to postal voters a few days after the close of nominations on 20th April. Postal votes will be opened several days before polling day and observers may attend to make sure no malpractice makes mistakes.

Funds. We are still short of funds which means we are fighting with one hand tied behind our backs. If you can help out with funds would you please send a cheque to The Secretary at PO Box 2755, Thornton Heath, CR7 9BD.

We will make them pay. We are now really starting to hurt the mainstream parties and the corrupt thieves who have bankrupted our country. We need to fightback we cannot remain passive. Our countrymen and women have fought like lions in the past to preserve what was Great about our nation and people. We must remember this is the coming weeks. I salute you.

Robert Bailey, London Organiser,
34 Sylvan Avenue, Chadwell Heath,
Romford, RM6 6BE
london@bnp.org.uk
07742749614

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Yesterday evening, Richard Edmonds was the main speaker at the meeting of the BNP Southwark Branch. Richard reminded us of the London that was before it was buried by flood immigration that caused more damage than the Blitz.

Both Stephen Tyler, BNP Prospective Member of Parliament, for Bermondsey and Old Southwark, and Richard Edmonds have many memories of decades of political campaigning, raising the alert about the factors that led to the crisis Britain is facing today.

As a child, Richard Edmonds grew up in real Britain. What for many generations that came afterwards is today an aspiration, for Richard it was a reality. He grew up in a different country, a country in which unemployment, welfare dependency and crime had not reached the endemic levels of today.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Looking at the figures of growth that indicate a percentage of a point and comparing that to increases in the daily real economy, it is easy to see where things are going. VAT at 20% and VAT on food? Can you imagine that?

In some places, fuel costs have risen beyond belief and those costs can only be translated into higher prices in the shops and lower income for those whose jobs involve travelling or have to travel to go to work. So yes, things are growing, but growing for the wrong reasons.

It is no so difficult to understand why the number of family disputes due to lack of money is also rising and things get to a point when even the most basic needs cannot be met. During a very short period of time, 160,000 people contacted special agencies to try and solve their debt problems.

The answer came loud and clear: many thousands of families are beyond help, caught in situations in which they cannot even declare themselves bankrupt because they do not have the money to get all the legal paperwork done.

Does this sound familiar? We are not talking merely about impoverished individuals living in housing estates. We are talking about the so called middle class families that find themselves irrevocably stuck and with nowhere to go. We are talking about Middle Britain. 

In 1997, the Labour government said the there was a deficit of 30,000 new homes a year to cope with demand. This is why they brought in more than three million immigrants and pretend refugees that have taken more than 90 per cent of all the new jobs created in Britain to cope with a haemorrhage of jobs being exported to China and other countries.

We are seeing the consequences translated as more than 8 million people unemployed and thousands and thousands of repossessions and insolvencies. As Labour keeps bringing newcomers who want to have the same living standards as the locals but without having to pay, those who paid during their entire working lives are going to suffer more and more.

Who has not heard about the pension crisis? Who has not heard about over-crowded classrooms? Who has not heard about long waiting lists for social housing? The old suffer and the young suffer. The old suffer because they will not receive what they were promised. The young will suffer because, without a job and spending much of their lives as unemployed, they will not be able to have a decent life, let alone save for their old age.

There are the realities of Globalisation and Flood Immigration, two of the doctrines of the Labour Party and their acolytes. Globalisation and Flood Immigration do not exist to make the lives of ordinary people better. Globalisation and Flood Immigration are transforming Britain into a Third World Country.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The man of the bicycle and the cricket bat knows that we are right and these two variables – the bicycle and the cricket bat – are vital. Why? Because the bicycle is the tool to fight against mass unemployment caused by an across the board mismanagement of the economy. Unemployment is today and everyday one of the most important issues. The cricket bat is important because identity is what is at stake. Huge chunks of Britain have been ethnically cleansed.

Norman Tebbit suffered in Brighton some years ago and has suffered since then the direct consequences of sectarian violence. He knows more than many others what divided and incompatible communities can bring and this kind of incompatibilities is what we have to deal with in Britain today. We do not want Britain to have to face in the near future a Balkan War.

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Nationalists will remember how a few days ago we reported how UNITE, a union that is bankrolling the Labour party, called off a debate because one of the panellists was a BNP member.

Below there is an article from Ian Lucas in Eastbourne Today that blasts this decision.

He is not fan of the BNP and he mistakenly believes that our policies can be exposed and voters can be easily convinced not to support us.

It’s a nonsense, as ordinary people who are struggling and suffering because of immigration will carry on supporting us, whatever people like Mr Lucas write in their articles.

Nonetheless it’s worth a read as he makes some good points that will surely upset many antifascists, nothing makes them more furious that a local paper defending the right of BNP members to express their views.

It is no surprise to me that UNITE, one of the Unions bankrolling the Labour Party, is afraid of democracy.
They stopped a political debate going ahead in Eastbourne the other day because the BNP were due to take part.

This is ridiculous, reminiscent of those who didn’t want the BNP on Question Time a few months ago.

Just because we don’t like what they stand for doesn’t mean they don’t have a right to say it. All that does is gives the BNP a notoriety that they thrive upon.

The Herald itself said this was not an easy decision. I disagree. I think it was.

The debate should have gone ahead.

Whether you like or loathe them, the BNP are a legal political party, and if we really do live in a tolerant country that believes in free speech it is an outrage that we try to keep views we may not like quiet.

The UNITE union seem to think that the BNP will go away if we ignore them.

I’ve got news for them. They won’t.

Even Labour is in on this. I don’t know what they are frightened of?

The Hastings Labour MP Michael Foster, a very decent man, has also said he won’t share a platform with the BNP. Again a bad decision.

We are only a few weeks away from a general election campaign. I am sad that we have to put up with a BNP candidate in Eastbourne – but make no mistake they have an absolute right to stand. And if we don’t challenge them for their views, exposing the issues upon which we disagree, we can be pretty sure they will have a higher vote than they deserve, and we will have to put up with them at every election.

If we challenge them and expose that their policies don’t stack up to scrutiny, they won’t survive for long.

In Eastbourne we normally have a few public hustings meetings in Churches and the Town Hall. I hope that happens again this year and that organisers don’t bottle out because they don’t like the ‘far right’ BNP (who are actually a far left organisation).

Now just for the record, I believe the BNP to be small minded and fundamentally misguided, and they wouldn’t get my vote in a million years. But I would absolutely defend their right to say what they believe. How else can democracy thrive?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share this post:

Hide Sites

Another news item offers evidence about how far the Islamification of Britain has gone.

A secular Muslim woman councillor has been forced to dress more conservatively after receiving death threats and sexually harassing phone calls from members of her own community.

Shiria Khatun, 38, has called in the police after sinister calls in which threats were made not only against her, but also her four young children.

In one they warned they would dig up her parents’ graves and bury her there instead.

The Labour councillor in the controversial borough of Tower Hamlets—named in a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary last week as a centre of Islamic fundamentalism—is considered one of the area’s most progressive politicians.

She was elected in 2006, worked for Ken Livingstone as a transport adviser at London’s City Hall and frequently campaigns for more Muslim women to enter politics.

However, over the past year she has been the victim of a “sick” harassment campaign.

She has been bombarded with anonymous calls and even followed home.

At first she was “too embarrassed” to call the police, but when the threats, mostly made in the Bangladeshi dialect Sylheti, targeted her family she decided to act.

She said: “As a councillor I’m meant to be a strong woman and I didn’t want to show that I was bothered, but it’s gone too far.

“They’re really disgusting. They would talk about my Western clothes, my tight jeans and my body parts.

“One man said—and it sounds much nastier in Sylheti—‘I know where you live and I’m going to come and show you and your kids’. I just hung up.

“I really thought it was a pervert, but then it started to get more intense. My parents died when I was young and the callers must know that because they said they would dig up their graves and bury me inside. I think they’re sick.”

Following the calls, she started wearing more loose-fitting traditional Asian clothes and glasses instead of contact lenses to be “taken more seriously”.

She said: “I didn’t even realise that I was giving into them, but my skirts started getting longer and the whole thing left me demoralised.

“Other Muslim women have advised me to dress down because of rumours within the Bengali community, mostly men, criticising me for being too Western looking.

“I don’t like people exploiting religion to tell me I’m not a proper Muslim. We live in a democratic society and I have the right to dress how I like.”

She has so far refused to wear the Muslim hijab headscarf, something she said is a more common sight on the streets of Tower Hamlets—a densely Bangladeshi-populated borough—than in Bangladesh itself.

Many put that down to the growing influence of the strict Saudi Arabian Wahhabi doctrine of Islam in the East End of London.

Cllr Khatun added: “I returned from a visit to Bangladesh not long ago and it’s definitely more conservative here than it is there.

“I used to look at the photos of Bangladeshi women who came here in the Sixties and go ‘Wow!’ and think how amazingly fashionable and liberal they were with their short-sleeved blouses and bouffant hairdos.

“It’s all changed so much now for younger women.”

Police confirmed they were investigating the councillor’s complaint.

Well, this is what the BNP have been saying for years and we have been accused of inciting racial hatred.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

The abiding dream of all nationalist’ is to close our borders, kick out illegal immigrants, stop giving benefits and council houses to asylum seekers and give incentives to legal immigrants to go back to their home countries.

Will anyone from the mainstream media support those policies? No of course not!

We know the answer to immigration, and apparently it is dawning on some liberal journalists in the USA  at last!

This is why I decided to present for nationalists’ delectation and delight a commentary published in ‘The Bulletin’, a Philadelphia based newspaper.

The author of this piece Jim Wiles, is robust in his hatred of the British National Party, but in his article he shows his thinking is in line with the policies of his target of scorn; it contains a lot of common sense, such common sense as would be unthinkable in the UK MSM.

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/12/12/commentary/op-eds/doc4b23fa9caa66e460370513.txt

Have you noticed the Mexicans are going home? Some are trying to tough it out – and apparently even asking for help from home, but the trend line in illegal immigration to the United States is definitely down.

It’s particularly noticeable here on the Redneck Riviera. In 2005 – 2006, the Grand Strand was one of the four fastest-growing areas in the country.

Illegal immigrants swarmed on construction sites and in all sorts of outdoor work. Food carts and local Mexican restaurants offered regional specialties. Lowes and McDonald’s had bilingual signs. The old day laborer market for local African Americans had disappeared, replaced by Hispanics.

One night, pulling out of the Food Lion two blocks from my parents’ house, I saw a scary sight: a Mexican mom, baby in one hand, handlebar in the other, pushing out into rush hour traffic to take the groceries — safely strapped into the baby seat — home. I followed her, running interference with my car, until she’d turned safely into her driveway.

She didn’t have a hand free to wave. But her smile lit up the night.

That was then. With the bursting of the boom, she’s gone. So’s the day laborer market. Gone, too, this summer, were the armies of Eastern European students who had worked here the previous two years in the hospitality and retail industries.

The current economic debacle, thus, contains within it at least one pearl: a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rectify our illegal immigration problem in a humane way.

In this 24-hour news cycle, we seem able only to focus on one story at a time. Yet, the illegal immigration story has not gone away. It’s still right there, festering.

This is important because illegal immigration is one of those “intractable” problems, which is destroying the legitimacy of America’s government. It’s not intractable. Our rulers, whatever their party, simply don’t want to stop illegal immigration.

A majority of the American people disagree – strongly. Today, with 10 percent unemployment, that disagreement is stronger than ever.

This gap between voters and their elected representatives exists in far worse form in Europe. One example is the European Union (E.U.) itself, opposed by most voters, but implemented anyway.

The most recent example is the Swiss referendum held two weeks ago. Fifty seven percent of Swiss voters supported a ban on construction of new minarets. The response of political leaders across Western Europe? To condemn this expression of the popular will and to fervently hope that the European Human Rights Court will strike it down.

In today’s Western Europe, nationalism has become the virtue, which dare not speak its name.

The Swiss vote came on the heels of the revelation that the wave of Muslim and other non-white immigration into the United Kingdom since the coming of Tony Blair and the Labor Party to power in 1997 was not, as most had thought, the result of government incompetence. It was a deliberate policy. The Laborites sought to change the U.K.’s racial and religious complexion to help achieve their goal of de-constructing British society.

Even with that bombshell, British Conservatives won’t touch immigration. So, is it any wonder, then, that some voters are turning to the neo-fascist British National Party, which promises to “guarantee that Britain remains British?” As I’ve noted here before, the re-emergence of such parties in Europe is the direct result of elected leaders repeatedly overriding the voters’ wishes.

Here, in the U.S., happily, we have the opposite of voter apathy: a full blown, populist rebellion. But, in all of the hullabaloo, the illegal immigration issue has, so far, gotten dropped by the wayside.

It’s clear that, like Britain’s Labor Party, the Obama Democrats view illegal immigration as in their political interest. Why else the repeated trumpeting this year that conservatives are going to end up on the ash heap of history because America’s demographic makeup is changing? And yet, like the Tories, the GOP is gun-shy about the illegal immigration issue.

In Italy, the government is offering money to illegal immigrants willing to be returned to their countries of origin.

Something like that might be a modest, first step towards tackling America’s illegal immigration problem. It would also immediately begin making private sector jobs available to unemployed Americans. According to recent press reports, it’s not just Hispanics anymore down at the day laborer line at Home Depot and Lowes.

They are people you and I know.

Jim Wiles is a Philadelphia lawyer. He can be reached at jwiles@thebulletin.us

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites

We are looking for more contributors to help bring news and information to the patriotic people of London. Do you have an interest in news and events in and around London and want to share this with others?

Ideally we are looking for people to contribute items with a London theme, whether that be reporting on events or commentary on news items relating to immigration, crime, education, health, transport or indeed anything else affecting Londoners.

Although we are happy to accept contributions of a more national or international nature, as you are aware we already have some able contributors dealing with such issues and we are now looking to add a more London focussed feel to the site.

If this interests you then please send an email to admin@londonpatriot.org and we will set you up with a contributor account.

Help us to make London Patriot the number one resource for London nationalists.

Share this post:

Hide Sites