As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share

Another news item offers evidence about how far the Islamification of Britain has gone.

A secular Muslim woman councillor has been forced to dress more conservatively after receiving death threats and sexually harassing phone calls from members of her own community.

Shiria Khatun, 38, has called in the police after sinister calls in which threats were made not only against her, but also her four young children.

In one they warned they would dig up her parents’ graves and bury her there instead.

The Labour councillor in the controversial borough of Tower Hamlets—named in a Channel 4 Dispatches documentary last week as a centre of Islamic fundamentalism—is considered one of the area’s most progressive politicians.

She was elected in 2006, worked for Ken Livingstone as a transport adviser at London’s City Hall and frequently campaigns for more Muslim women to enter politics.

However, over the past year she has been the victim of a “sick” harassment campaign.

She has been bombarded with anonymous calls and even followed home.

At first she was “too embarrassed” to call the police, but when the threats, mostly made in the Bangladeshi dialect Sylheti, targeted her family she decided to act.

She said: “As a councillor I’m meant to be a strong woman and I didn’t want to show that I was bothered, but it’s gone too far.

“They’re really disgusting. They would talk about my Western clothes, my tight jeans and my body parts.

“One man said—and it sounds much nastier in Sylheti—‘I know where you live and I’m going to come and show you and your kids’. I just hung up.

“I really thought it was a pervert, but then it started to get more intense. My parents died when I was young and the callers must know that because they said they would dig up their graves and bury me inside. I think they’re sick.”

Following the calls, she started wearing more loose-fitting traditional Asian clothes and glasses instead of contact lenses to be “taken more seriously”.

She said: “I didn’t even realise that I was giving into them, but my skirts started getting longer and the whole thing left me demoralised.

“Other Muslim women have advised me to dress down because of rumours within the Bengali community, mostly men, criticising me for being too Western looking.

“I don’t like people exploiting religion to tell me I’m not a proper Muslim. We live in a democratic society and I have the right to dress how I like.”

She has so far refused to wear the Muslim hijab headscarf, something she said is a more common sight on the streets of Tower Hamlets—a densely Bangladeshi-populated borough—than in Bangladesh itself.

Many put that down to the growing influence of the strict Saudi Arabian Wahhabi doctrine of Islam in the East End of London.

Cllr Khatun added: “I returned from a visit to Bangladesh not long ago and it’s definitely more conservative here than it is there.

“I used to look at the photos of Bangladeshi women who came here in the Sixties and go ‘Wow!’ and think how amazingly fashionable and liberal they were with their short-sleeved blouses and bouffant hairdos.

“It’s all changed so much now for younger women.”

Police confirmed they were investigating the councillor’s complaint.

Well, this is what the BNP have been saying for years and we have been accused of inciting racial hatred.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The abiding dream of all nationalist’ is to close our borders, kick out illegal immigrants, stop giving benefits and council houses to asylum seekers and give incentives to legal immigrants to go back to their home countries.

Will anyone from the mainstream media support those policies? No of course not!

We know the answer to immigration, and apparently it is dawning on some liberal journalists in the USA  at last!

This is why I decided to present for nationalists’ delectation and delight a commentary published in ‘The Bulletin’, a Philadelphia based newspaper.

The author of this piece Jim Wiles, is robust in his hatred of the British National Party, but in his article he shows his thinking is in line with the policies of his target of scorn; it contains a lot of common sense, such common sense as would be unthinkable in the UK MSM.

http://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/12/12/commentary/op-eds/doc4b23fa9caa66e460370513.txt

Have you noticed the Mexicans are going home? Some are trying to tough it out – and apparently even asking for help from home, but the trend line in illegal immigration to the United States is definitely down.

It’s particularly noticeable here on the Redneck Riviera. In 2005 – 2006, the Grand Strand was one of the four fastest-growing areas in the country.

Illegal immigrants swarmed on construction sites and in all sorts of outdoor work. Food carts and local Mexican restaurants offered regional specialties. Lowes and McDonald’s had bilingual signs. The old day laborer market for local African Americans had disappeared, replaced by Hispanics.

One night, pulling out of the Food Lion two blocks from my parents’ house, I saw a scary sight: a Mexican mom, baby in one hand, handlebar in the other, pushing out into rush hour traffic to take the groceries — safely strapped into the baby seat — home. I followed her, running interference with my car, until she’d turned safely into her driveway.

She didn’t have a hand free to wave. But her smile lit up the night.

That was then. With the bursting of the boom, she’s gone. So’s the day laborer market. Gone, too, this summer, were the armies of Eastern European students who had worked here the previous two years in the hospitality and retail industries.

The current economic debacle, thus, contains within it at least one pearl: a once-in-a-generation opportunity to rectify our illegal immigration problem in a humane way.

In this 24-hour news cycle, we seem able only to focus on one story at a time. Yet, the illegal immigration story has not gone away. It’s still right there, festering.

This is important because illegal immigration is one of those “intractable” problems, which is destroying the legitimacy of America’s government. It’s not intractable. Our rulers, whatever their party, simply don’t want to stop illegal immigration.

A majority of the American people disagree – strongly. Today, with 10 percent unemployment, that disagreement is stronger than ever.

This gap between voters and their elected representatives exists in far worse form in Europe. One example is the European Union (E.U.) itself, opposed by most voters, but implemented anyway.

The most recent example is the Swiss referendum held two weeks ago. Fifty seven percent of Swiss voters supported a ban on construction of new minarets. The response of political leaders across Western Europe? To condemn this expression of the popular will and to fervently hope that the European Human Rights Court will strike it down.

In today’s Western Europe, nationalism has become the virtue, which dare not speak its name.

The Swiss vote came on the heels of the revelation that the wave of Muslim and other non-white immigration into the United Kingdom since the coming of Tony Blair and the Labor Party to power in 1997 was not, as most had thought, the result of government incompetence. It was a deliberate policy. The Laborites sought to change the U.K.’s racial and religious complexion to help achieve their goal of de-constructing British society.

Even with that bombshell, British Conservatives won’t touch immigration. So, is it any wonder, then, that some voters are turning to the neo-fascist British National Party, which promises to “guarantee that Britain remains British?” As I’ve noted here before, the re-emergence of such parties in Europe is the direct result of elected leaders repeatedly overriding the voters’ wishes.

Here, in the U.S., happily, we have the opposite of voter apathy: a full blown, populist rebellion. But, in all of the hullabaloo, the illegal immigration issue has, so far, gotten dropped by the wayside.

It’s clear that, like Britain’s Labor Party, the Obama Democrats view illegal immigration as in their political interest. Why else the repeated trumpeting this year that conservatives are going to end up on the ash heap of history because America’s demographic makeup is changing? And yet, like the Tories, the GOP is gun-shy about the illegal immigration issue.

In Italy, the government is offering money to illegal immigrants willing to be returned to their countries of origin.

Something like that might be a modest, first step towards tackling America’s illegal immigration problem. It would also immediately begin making private sector jobs available to unemployed Americans. According to recent press reports, it’s not just Hispanics anymore down at the day laborer line at Home Depot and Lowes.

They are people you and I know.

Jim Wiles is a Philadelphia lawyer. He can be reached at jwiles@thebulletin.us

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

We are looking for more contributors to help bring news and information to the patriotic people of London. Do you have an interest in news and events in and around London and want to share this with others?

Ideally we are looking for people to contribute items with a London theme, whether that be reporting on events or commentary on news items relating to immigration, crime, education, health, transport or indeed anything else affecting Londoners.

Although we are happy to accept contributions of a more national or international nature, as you are aware we already have some able contributors dealing with such issues and we are now looking to add a more London focussed feel to the site.

If this interests you then please send an email to admin@londonpatriot.org and we will set you up with a contributor account.

Help us to make London Patriot the number one resource for London nationalists.

Share

I found this leaflet on my doormat and was just about to consign it to the recycling pile when I noticed a hand-written note attached, which read: ‘Roberta, I found this in a Greenwich library, please pass on’. It was unsigned and I assume had been directed to me in my capacity as a representative of the British National Party in Greenwich.

The leaflet is headed ‘Mama Afrika Family Association – Putting the needs of young refugees and asylum seekers first’. Amongst their services they claim to ‘Refer, link and signpost to relevant services e.g. Health, Schools and Colleges, Housing, Immigration, Social Services, Welfare and Benefits’.

Mama Afrika also offers practical support ‘writing CV’s and filling in welfare benefit and other relevant forms’ and ‘to improve and support the lives of young refugees and asylum seekers in Greenwich and Lewisham Boroughs’ However, the name of the association would indicate that it’s services are aimed, not at all refugees and asylum seekers, but specifically those of African origin.

I can only assume that my informant was shocked by the blatant ‘racism’ of this leaflet and perhaps more so that it was available through a public library. Maybe they were also struck by such double standards in a public body promoting such an exclusive self-interest group at a time when the British National Party is being persecuted for attempting to do just the same for the indigenous British people of this country.

While I can understand Mama Afrika wanting to put the interests of their specific racial group first, I would claim the same right for my own racial group. Why is it only us, the indigenous British people, who are accused of ‘racism’ when we seek to address the concerns of our own people, and do this, not with government funds (assuming Mama Afrika is funded by Greenwich/Lewisham boroughs) but with the small £5 and £10 contributions of our own supporters?

Robert Woods

British National Party Greenwich

Share

As a massive smear campaign against the BNP is under way, it’s good to see someone writing a positive article.

Here some important passages:

Voters will probably try to comfort themselves with the knowledge that Labour will not win the next General Election and we will have a “new” party with “fresh” ideas.

Unfortunately, it makes no difference which of the main parties gain power, as they all have the same masters. In Britain, as in the US, the voters are given two parties to choose from, this is to give the public an illusion of choice. It does not matter to the power brokers who win, as they control both.

In order for this system to work, the public are forced into a “heads or tails” situation, any other potential candidates are discredited by the usual players, with the help of the mainstream media who are there to manipulate public opinion.

A good example of this was seen in the US when Ron Paul attempted to become a presidential candidate. Despite a huge following (mainly on the internet), the media deliberately hid his successes from the public, ensuring that his growing popularity would not encourage others to take an interest. He was excluded from poll results and refused access to many important debates.

With the General Election getting nearer, we are seeing similar tactics being used against the BNP (British National Party). Even though the mainstream media tell us that they have no chance of winning the election, they still feel it is necessary to “blacken” their image (no pun intended). If they really have no chance, why should anyone worry about them at all?

Could it be that the media are misleading us about the popularity of the BNP? Clearly, the number of people who visit their site support this possibility, which seems to attract more visitors than the main parties combined.

The image presented to us of the BNP (by the media and rival parties), is of a political group that resembles the Nazi party or KKK. However, if you were to study their website more closely and examine all the information available, you would most certainly obtain a very different picture.

I was pleasantly surprised to see comments posted on their site by people of different races and colour (supportive of the BNP’s aim). I could give examples of the policies that the BNP would introduce if in power, but it would be better if you visit their site and discover this for yourself.

Are the BNP radical in their views? If reducing (or even stopping) immigration to ease future population problems, racial tension and unemployment is something you consider “radical”, then I guess they are guilty. But can anyone honestly believe that Britain can sustain its current immigration levels and rapidly increasing birth rates?

Reports recently published show that the UK population has topped 61 million for the first time, and whilst immigration has apparently fallen (in respect of Eastern Europeans), there are no figures available for the levels of other immigrants (or any estimate on illegal immigrants).

Perhaps of more interest is the fact that more than half of the births recorded were to women born outside of the UK. According to some statistics, the UK is likely to achieve a population of 70 million within the next 25 years. But if current immigration levels are maintained, along with the birth rate percentages already seen, the figure of 70 million will be achieved much more quickly than that.

Regardless of what your political views are, or which country you originally came from, the population situation is a serious problem that must be confronted sooner, rather than later. This will affect every British citizen, no matter what their colour, race or religion and something must be done.

Whether you agree with all the views presented by the BNP, at the moment they are the only party offering any realistic solution to the problem, and the courage to put this plan into action if elected, something the Conservatives or Labour will not do.

The main political parties have had their chance to get things right, and have failed miserably. The only winners are the big companies who have these politicians in their pockets (who are later rewarded with positions in their companies), but the rest of us have to accept nearly 3 million unemployed and a growing population that we cannot afford.

For years the government has made us all feel guilty about showing our true feelings towards immigrants that are not prepared to accept our traditions, culture and laws. We have created “exceptions” to our laws to cater for certain religious groups, and introduced many new laws that have helped some immigrants to obtain an unfair advantage over others. Is this equality?

How many other countries would be prepared to make such exceptions for immigrants from Britain?

In order to protect the indigenous British people and those who are descendants of foreign-born parents (supportive of traditional British customs and laws); immediate action must be taken to avoid an “overload” of the system. As everyone knows, high unemployment always produces resentment towards immigrants that are seen to be taking their jobs. This is not always the case, but a common reaction.

If unemployment levels continue to remain high, as seems likely, it is inevitable that problems will develop. Surely, it makes sense to tackle this problem before that happens and maintain the harmony that we have enjoyed for so many years.

It might of course help if people (especially the government and media) stopped highlighting the “differences” between British citizens. Why refer to some British people as Black or Asian? If they have a British passport, they are British and all subject to the laws of the land equally (no exceptions!)

How you choose to vote at the next General Election is of course your business, but maybe it is time to forget about voting for a party just because “I always vote for them”, or in your anger choose the next most popular party (according to the media) because you do not want to “waste” your vote. By supporting the current two party system you are wasting your vote and doing exactly what the power brokers expect you to do (and have always done).

Before casting your vote, give some thought to all the soldiers that have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, because of the decision by George Bush and Tony Blair to have a war for oil. Think of all the people who died in the Lockerbie bombing and how the bomber was released to make an oil deal. Remember how all those MP’s cheated you with their expenses claims (not just Labour!) and the lies they told. Do you really want more of that?

Too good to be true?
Yes, in fact this article was published on Newsblaze, an American website.
No one in the British mainstream media will never write something like that, after all the National Union of Journalist clearly state that the BNP must get only negative coverage.
However, thanks to the internet, it’s possible now to go around this Soviet-style censorship and it’s help to explain why many newspapers are almost bankrupt.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Croydon Guardian Immigration fraudsters

Would a brewery employ alcoholics? Would a nursey employ paedophiles? Would the fire brigade employ pyromaniacs? I doubt it, so why is the UK Border Agency HQ employing immigrants? The article above doesn’t state where these employees were born, but it’s clear from their names that they are not native British people. With plenty of adequately qualified indigenous people available on the labour market, why take the risk of employing people who have umpteen cousins/aunts/uncles etc in some third world village, desperate to come and live in our over-crowded island nation?

“Unfortunately there are a small number who seek to abuse their position.” Well I’m sorry Mr Pearce, but I do not find 10 members of staff [who were CAUGHT] in 2 years, to be a small number. The whole situation is shambolic, and how are the public expected to have any confidence that things will improve?

Share

After a report presented by the House of Lords against mass immigration, the catastrophic news regarding unemployment and the rising outcry in communities across the United Kingdom that are sinking under the weight of flood immigration promoted by the Labour government, once again the British National Party has proven, without a shadow of a doubt, that it is the only party that truly listens to the British peoples.

The Labour Party finds itself between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, they know that limiting or halting immigration altogether is the only way to avoid something that in political terms would amount to civil war. On the other hand, they know that their hands are tied up by European Union regulations and the treaties they themselves signed and support.

Aware of this dilemma, the Conservatives say that it is practically impossible to limit or even stop immigration from European Union countries without Britain leaving the European Union and that only immigration from outside the European Union can be limited or stopped.

Labour MPs talk about stopping immigration from European Union countries to allow immigration from former British colonies in the Indian Subcontinent, in Africa, in Asia and from other parts of the world including Latin America, position that is absolutely at odds with Labour’s Pro-European Union credentials.

One prominent Labour MP speaking in the House of Commons even accused the Conservatives of proposing the formation of a ‘Waffen SS force to control British borders’ when the Conservatives suggested that we should have a special police force to protect our borders from illegal immigrants.

We are living in interesting times and it is self-evident that the so called mainstream political parties are falling on their own swords when it comes to immigration, troubled by contradictory policies they themselves have promoted.

The British National Party, either by name or by reference, thanks to the British peoples that are increasingly supporting the policies of the British National Party, has a permanent presence in the British Parliament.

Official figures indicate that last year not less than half a million immigrants entered the United Kingdom with the intention of settling down in the United Kingdom. Almost half of all new housing units built in the UK are built for immigrants at a time in which tens of thousands of families have already lost their properties and more than three hundred thousand families are in danger of losing their homes.

No wonder then that a prominent member of the Labour Cabinet went down on her knees begging the banks to be more forgiving when it comes to repossessions and this has a direct link with flood immigration.  Public services are falling apart, unemployment is rising exponentially and thousands of families are losing their homes and facing a very uncertain future because of Labour’s flood immigration.

Share

None other than Phil Woolas, Labour’s Immigration Minister, joins Frank Field, denouncing that flood immigration is creating havoc in the United Kingdom and in particular in England where most of immigrants settle down. Mr. Woolas publicly declared that ‘Labour will not allow the population of the United Kingdom to go beyond 70 million.

I wonder how is the Labour government – or any of the so called mainstream political parties – going to stop a demographic cataclism from happening. Is Labour talking about mass deportation or is it just another piece of spin to calm down voters as Trade Unions become increasingly concerned as their numbers join the queues of unemployment.

As the economic crisis bites harder and harder, Labour senses that its ideological position regarding immigration is turning into a poison chalice. We await with expectation May 2009 when the next Budget is supposed to be delivered and tax payers, once again, will be confronted with rising taxes, rising debt and the almost certainty of budget cuts in the public sector.

But we shouldn’t wait too long to see what is on the horizon. As Christmas Time approaches we all know that poor sales will be for many businesses big and small a catastrophe leading to massive lay-offs. Already the official number of unemployed has gone beyond the mark of 1.73 million, an increase of more than 164,000 people out of work in just a few weeks, and many analysts have indicated that by the end of the year the number of people out of work would have gone beyond the 2 million mark.

Much of the tax revenues come from the so called services sector and this includes the banking sector. So when the Chancellor of the Exchequer calculated the figures involved in the planning of the budget he did not foresee that the economy would become stagnant and that the Treasury would invest hundreds of billions of pounds to rescue failing financial institutions.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer did not foresee either that Central Government would have to rescue more than 108 local authorities that have deposits in now defunct Icelandic banks, in spite of the fact that many local authorities say that they had ‘contingency funds’ that would help them cope with short-term cash problems. Unfortunately, cash problems are far from being short term problems and the hopes of avoiding drastic Council Tax rises right before the European and  Council Elections seem to be fading away.

The Government is desperately trying to put pressure on oil companies to reduce fuel prices that could lead to a reduction of utility bills – electricity, gas and water – but this also means that tax receipts would also fall at a time when the welfare system is under enormous pressure to cope with rising unemployment.

The damage the Labour government has caused with flood immigration during more than eleven years cannot be easily undone and extremely unsavoury immigration policies would have to be implemented. Unfortunately, there is no short-term solution and millions of British families are already living below the poverty line. Official figures indicate that in more than 15% of British families there are no working adults and that they all depend on welfare payments to survive.

The number of repossessions is rising very rapidly and once again according to official figures more than 300,000 families cannot afford their mortgage payments. Many thousands, desperate to find a way out, sold their homes to loan sharks that duped them with false promises involving cheap rental agreements that suddenly turned sour and evictions followed.

The words of Gordon Brown promising just a few months ago ‘hundreds of thousands of jobs for British workers’ ring in my ears. The recent speech of David Cameron - today’s Leader of the Opposition – saying that the Labour government had got things wrong sounds like a bit of an under-statement.

The present nightmare was absolutely predictable, but the so called politically correct politicians chose to put under the carpet the tell-tale signs of a crisis that was bound to happen sooner than later.

Share

In the latest saga of the wave of crime that is spreading in Britain, the Home Office is said to have indicated that the ‘Credit crunch could lead to a crime wave’

The economic downturn is set to lead to more crime, fewer police, more illegal immigration and a rise in far right extremism, a leaked Home Office letter reveals, and the news is provided by The Daily Telegraph. Of course blaming the so called ‘far right extremism’ always comes handy when you have a government that is visibly incompetent.

When you have a downgraded Police service blatantly deprived of the necessary resources and people calling the 999 emergency services only to be told that there isn’t enough Police staff, people who are then advised to deal with crime themselves because the Police is nowhere to be seen.

The Labour Party has found a brilliant solution. Since there are not enough Police Officers, they are planning to give civilians without uniforms and without proper training the power to enforce the Law. A fantastic recipe for trouble!

Share

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7505574.stm

“A network of criminality in one of the UK’s largest illegal immigrant communities has been exposed by an undercover BBC News investigation.

Widespread unlawful job practices, squalid housing, and a thriving trade in fake documents were uncovered.

More than 40 houses packed with illegal immigrants were identified in one square mile of Southall, west London.

The young, mostly male Punjabis are not here lawfully and, although most know the risks, they have few legal rights.

They are surrounded by forgers, criminals and ruthless employers.”

…

“Vicki said he could get people into the country on lorries, known as donkeys, organised by what he called his “man in Paris”, and told how he could provide a fake “original” passport that had been “checked” to beat security at a UK airport.”

It’s time New Labour stopped advertising for common purpose jobs in the Independent and The Guardian and brought our troops home to secure our borders!

Share

It is official. Parliamentarians are waking up to the certainty of having immigration riots that could easily become race riots in Britain. As this happens, unemployment figures shot up and in one month alone more than 15,000 people registered for jobseekers allowance that in most cases is nothing else than a delaying tactic in an environment in which jobs are being lost by the tens of thousands.

The situation is such that David Cameron, the Conservative Party leader, is talking about importing legislation from the United States of America to avoid an epidemic of company closures leading to mass unemployment.

What is happening in Barking and Dagenham is happening in other parts of the country that are being flooded with Africans, Asians and peoples of other backgrounds that come into an already troubled environment and tensions are rising.

As the so called mainstream parties have proven to be utterly unwilling and/or incompetent to deal with the issue of immigration, political polarization will be unavoidable. I believe in political chemistry. Add the right ingredients in the same amounts and in the same conditions and you will get the same results.

For far too long the distressed voices of Police Chiefs, of Local Authorities, of Managers of Public Services like Education and Health – to name a few – have fallen into deaf ears. ‘We cannot cope anymore’, they say, but the politically correct elites refuse to listen and keep cracking about Multiculturalism and Globalisation.

If you want to know how much Multiculturalism and Globalisation cost, travel to your local Supermarket. In 1997, you could not carry 25 pound of shopping. Today, there is not much you can buy with 25 pound and especially if you have a family with children.

Ask the right questions: Why immigration? What for? What are they going to do? Being serious about crime? What do you think growing numbers of unemployed  families with equally unemployed children will do? There are already 300,000 youths carrying knives in Britain and this is only an official estimate.

Share

What if I asked what working class white Londoners are supposed to do, if they don’t like mass immigration into London? Would it be racist for a zealous black New Labour fan, to tell me that I should leave London if I don’t like diversity for the sake of diversity?

In a strange way, perhaps Mr McGrath should have resigned after all, because there is no way we in the BNP would have entertained such an absurd line of questioning. As a matter of fact, we would have turned the tables completly.

Is it not racist to assume that older Caribbean migrants would return to their home countries over a Tory mayor who has no race policies?

Is Marc Wadsworth (the ‘hack’ who questioned James) of the view that if we had a central government with no policies on race, that migrants would go home in their droves? It appears to be if one reads his article over at:

http://www.the-latest.com/blacks-should-go-back-home-if-they-dont-like-mayor

This particular paragraph is quite telling and dissapointing :

“Him, a guy from a country where Black people are the ‘Aboriginal’ indigenous nation who are stereotyped by the white colonisers as social security scrounging drunks, and me a confident, British-born Black activist and news media operator with a reasonable track record. I told him a little bit about my news media and campaigning background, including as a reporter/presenter at Thames Television and as the sort of ‘spin doctor’ and political facilitator for the Stephen Lawrence cause célèbre.”

I really don’t believe what I’m a reading. Only in Britain can someone make a remark that borders on racist about a white person AND get that white person out of a job!

If anything, the-latest.com should never have published such an article, if it contained a slur against white Australians.

Also, if Marc Wadsworth really gave a stuff about community relations between whites & blacks then he would have ensured that his articles had all instances of both the words “black” and “white” either capitalised or in lower case and not just having “Black” capitalised and “white” in lower case.

It’s not something he did by mistake, he’s done it in two articles now:

http://www.the-latest.com/the-latest-forces-sacking-of-race-gaffe-mayors-aide

http://www.the-latest.com/blacks-should-go-back-home-if-they-dont-like-mayor

Over and over as you read Marc’s main article, you’ll ask yourself the same question. Why is it not racist to pursue and have policies for the benefit of blacks but it suddenly is if we are talking about whites?

Share

One is left to ponder about the potentially dire consequences for peace and political stability within the United Kingdom generated by uncontrolled immigration. Unemployment and inflation are visibly out of control and they keep rising and rising at ever faster pace. The Balkanization of Britain is not unthinkable under present conditions.

There is one factor of paramount importance that makes the present conditions even more critical and it is the quality of immigration. While the government keeps insisting that there is a huge number of vacancies, employers say that they cannot possibly fill up the vacancies and since nine our of ten immigrants are coming from the Indian subcontinent, from Africa and the Middle East and other parts of the under-developed and under-under-developed world this comes as no surprise.

All the efforts made by the government to reduce the number of people living thanks to welfare and unemployment benefits can be compaired to trying to stop a tsunami with a tea spoon. If we try to reduce the numbers of the unemployed, for those whose only alternative is a life on welfare payments the only alternative left would be to leave the country or engage in a life of crime.

Those who are not at work and have no support still need to live somewhere and have their essential needs satisfied. When you visit many of our inner cities, you can clearly see that work is not a word that exists in many areas and especially in housing estates around the land. Thousands upon thousands of youngsters growing up in those conditions are fertile ground for crime.

The Labour government is virtually creating refugee camps all over Britain and taxes are spreading and going up and up to sustain the said refugee camps that have become a major concern for public safety.

The Labour government is caught up in an ideological trap of its own making and I am sure that in private many Labour politicians wish they could implement British National Party policies to avoid a catastrophe of gigantic proportions.  

Share

I will start this post simply by quoting what the BBC itself has published. When we are the source of criticism is one thing, but when the criticism comes from within the so called Establishment and is directed against the Establishment it is quite another.

‘The BBC is to blame for an increase in attacks on Polish people living in the UK, a Conservative MP has said.

Daniel Kawczynski said ‘the liberal elite’ at the corporation knew they had to cover the subject on immigration, but they would ’not do stories about more controversial immigration’ and focused instead on the sort of ’soft touch’ of ‘White Christians from Poland’.

‘You will not see many Poles on the dole, you will not see many Poles breaking the law’, said the Conservative MP who then went on to say that nine out of then immigrants in the UK come from Africa, the West Indies and the Indian sub-continent. Kawczyinski went on to say that the BBC focuses on white, Christian Poles because it is politically correct to do so and uses them as scapegoats.

Well, what the Conservative MP has just said only confirms that the BBC, a public broadcaster paid with public money, is actually carrying out a campaign of racism against whites. The BBC itself says that in January of this year, Sergeant Brian Hughes, of Cheshire Police, told the BBC News Website that victims of attacks were reluctant to come forward.

Let’s pause for a minute and think. This is a story about a Conservative MP practically saying that there is racism against whites and that the said racism against whites is being promoted by BBC reporting that promotes xenophobia against white Christian Poles overlooking the fact that eight out of then immigrants come from Africa, the West Indies and the Indian sub continent.

My reflexion on this issue is and I would express it as a letter to the Conservative MP:

‘Dear Daniel,

I read about your concerns regarding BBC’s coverage on immigration and in particular concerning Polish immigrants in the United Kingdom. I reckon your remarks were absolutely right on target. Here we have a public broadcaster that is suppossedly extremely pro-European and therefore very much in favour of the European Union creating a climate of intolerance against fellow Europeans that are legally entitled to come, live and work in the United Kingdom.

I am and have been for a long time very much aware of the BBC’s real agenda so BBC’s bias against fellow Europeans does not surprise me. As long as the official line supports the idea of belonging to the European Union, the BBC will have to support European Union membership, but in their hearts they know that European immigrants are not the core supporters of the Labour Party and that the core supporters of the Labour Party are unhappy about Eastern European immigration because Eastern Europeans compete with those coming from former British colonies. This is the reality and I am glad that a Conservative Member of Parliament has finally spoken about it.’

Racism against whites in the United Kingdom is a fact, either via the so called Positive Discrimination policies (if you are white, do not bother to apply) or via biased reporting carried out by none other than the BBC.

Share

Reading previous postings on BNP websites and on the local and national press regarding crime and abuse, I would like to ask those who so much criticize the vision of Britain proposed by the BNP the following question: ‘Do we need to live in fear simply because the parties that you support want to force upon us their ideological views leading to lack of satety and risks of national security?’

When we see what happened in the Balkans, when we see what happened in Rwanda, when we see what has been happening in the Middle East and Asia Minor, do we want to lose our rights to have a say regarding the country in which we live?

The question is not about ideology. The question is about the survival of Britain as a European country and the survival of Britain as a European country is something that should be above everything else.

Britain is increasingly a country under occupation and occupation of the worst kind. When you do not feel safe enough to walk around, when your children are attacked while playing at a local park, when no go areas are growing and growing, there is very little to smile about.

Do not believe for a minute that I am being led merely by what I read or see on the media. I am talking from personal experience. I was attacked on a bus on the way to Croydon, my wife was mugged in plain daylight at a local supermarket and in plain view of the public, and my two eldest children were attacked at a local park just a few days ago. Understandably concerned, I asked my children: ‘Were there any adults around when you were attacked?’ They replied: ‘There were adults around but they did not want to get involved.’ 

I ask again the question: Do we really need this?

Share

An article on the beeb website.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/articles/2008/05/19/yourstories_dhaka_orphanage_feature.shtml

“On a recent visit to Dhaka, capital of Bangladesh, Saadeya encountered a man who’d made his money in London and chosen to invest it back home in an orphanage.”

The article discusses Abu Taher Muhammad Abdullah, an Immigrant from Bangladesh who came to London in the 1960s, made it big and is now sending money to help a rural orphanage, back in Bangladesh.

Saadeya Shamsuddin, author of the article, refers to Abu helping out his country of origin, but not his people. While I don’t believe that Abu is in any way morally wrong to help out his old country of origin, I personally believe that from his heart, he’s sending back the money to help out whom he considers to be his own people; again, not really a problem as such.

But who are Abu’s own people? Can Abu ever see Londoners as being his own people? How can he, when such a large chunk of Londoners weren’t even born in the country let alone in London! If Abu was to return to his home village, to find that half of the villagers had been replaced by foreigners, would he still consider people of that village, “his people” ?

Share