Image via Wikipedia

If there is one positive thing about the emergency budget delivered by George Osborne is that it’s giving headaches to the Labour councillors in Barking & Dagenham.

So far the the council’s £18m primary school fund was slashed down to £4.8m.

However the soaring influx of new residents and the increase of the birthrate from 2,380 in 2001 to 3,619 in 2008 means there is more demand for school places.

Cllr Rocky Gill, cabinet member for education, said: “This news comes as a complete kick in the teeth for our borough.”

As expected Labour councillors are blaming government for any cuts in essential services and they clearly believe that people in Barking & Dagenham are thick like the “antifascists” that helped them to get elected.

Very few people (if any) in the borough support George Osborne but they know very well that it was Labour that created this problem in the first place by swamping the borough with immigrants in order to dilute the electoral base of the British National Party.

Without this influx there wouldn’t be any need to build any new schools as there wouldn’t be any shortage of school places and long-term residents never wanted this enrichment in the first place.

However what really worried labour councillors is that they cannot continue the ethnic cleansing of the borough.

Without new schools it will be hard to convince people (even ethnics) to move into the borough, as Jon Cruddas admitted last week, and this means that in 2014 the BNP has still the chance to get councillors elected.

In the meantime life for Labour is getting really hard.

Apart from the cuts in funding from central government the council must save £43m in the next three years (instead of the £36m predicted) and the next fiscal year it will have to save £5.5m in addition to the £14m already planned.

The BNP knew that the situation was really bad and this is why we planned to cut wasteful spending.

Given that Labour is not going to end funding to politically correct projects, interpreters, translations, immigration-only groups, close down the council newspapers and reduce the salaries of senior civil servants you can expect deep cuts in essential services.

How people will react is anybodies guess but at least Labour will have to pay the price for their own arrogance and contempt to voters.

Who knows, maybe the UAF and Searchlight did us a favour, after all what’s better for nationalists than watching the Labour party digging its own grave?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

After I named and shamed Jon Cruddas on this blog I emailed him to let him know about my article.

This was his reply:

“Good for you mate, tell bill bailey that our little conversation on Sunday has clearly been overtaken by events”

I don’t know what conversation Councillor Robert Bailey had him but how you can see he poked fun at me.

To put things into perspective when last year I made a similar complaint to all the councillors in Bexley, they contacted the borough Police commander and made clear they didn’t tolerate any attack on BNP activists.

Of course the reason for such zeal was that a few weeks before our candidate Michael Barnbrook missed a by-election victory by 8 votes in a ward were Conservatives used to have a strong majority.

Nonetheless they deserve credit for taking my complaint seriously, something Jon Cruddas didn’t do.

The way he behaved proves he supports violence against BNP activists, this is the only way for him to stay in power and milk more money from hard-working taxpayers.

So if someone is abused or assaulted in Barking & Dagenham he is the person to blame and the anger should be directed at him.

I repeat again, I blame Jon Cruddas and Margaret Hodge for the attack last week.

Jon Cruddas will be available to the voters on Friday the 20th of November at Dagenham Civic centre between 4pm-6pm.

Call 020 8984 7854 in case you need to book to meet him.

It will be interesting to see how he reacts if someone turns up to embarrass him.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

P.S. Not one of the Labour, Tory or Independent councillors from Barking & Dagenham has replied to me so far.

Share

As readers of  ’London Patriot’ will know, on Thursday the 5th of November 2009, one of a pack of black teenagers threw a glass bottle at me.

I have said before I don’t blame the black teenagers, I blame the Labour party for allowing their ancestors into our country in the first place.

Conveniently, it was revealed that in 2003 the ‘Home Office’ told immigration officers to fast track applications, even if this meant allowing dangerous or criminal foreigners entry to the UK.

This is why it’s time now to blame politicians for every crime carried out by people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place.

One of these politicians is Dagenham MP Jon Cruddas.

He claims to represent the working class, but he lives in a posh flat in Notting Hill, places his children in an exclusive school, and has bought three homes by abusing the ACA. How representative is that?

He and Margaret Hodge have allowed Barking & Dagenham to become swamped with immigrants in order to stay in power by using their vote (gerrymandering).

When they realised there was a chance that the BNP could take control of Barking & Dagenham, they decided to use UAF thugs to attack and intimidate BNP activists and incite ordinary people to use violence against us. This is why the pack of black youths felt empowered to throw a glass bottle at me.

When I complained to Jon Cruddas he sent me the following reply:

“Mr de santis I am very sorry to hear of your distress and the violent act you were a victim of. Not sure why I am responsible though; I would never incite people to attack you lot (he can’t even bring himself to use BNP) and have been critical of some (but not all?) who have in the past- all the best- jon”

This is a lie, Mr Cruddas is a UAF supporter and regularly writes in the ‘Daily Mirror’, a newspaper working together with antifascist groups to campaign against the British National Party. These leftwing rags on more than one occasion have incited people to use violence against BNP activists, if he is so squeaky clean why does he support UAF thugs? Let him deny his allegiance to UAF.

Let’s not forget he was touted to become Labour’ deputy leader and minister but he gave up to concentrate his efforts in stopping the BNP.

I didn’t get any reply from Margaret Hodge or any other Barking & Dagenahm’ councillors but I’m not surprised, after all they never cared about white people living in the borough.

I make no apology for naming and shaming politicians in this blog, it is about time they paid for their crimes.

This is why I urge nationalists to direct their anger to them.

Their contact details are in the article I posted a few days ago:

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/11/07/black-teenager-throws-glass-bottle-at-bnp-activists/

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

“Education, Education, Education” was the slogan used by the Labour party 12 years ago to con(vince) people into believing that things can only get better.

How much better it is, you be the judge.

An article published in the ‘Daily Mail’ says, one in ten white boys is leaving school without any real qualifications.

In many Towns and Cities the figure is closer to one in five failing to get at least five GCSEs – the Government’s benchmark of basic Secondary school achievement.

The figures show that nationwide, 10 per cent of white boys – 23,860 pupils – ended compulsory education without getting five GCSEs, or equivalent, of any grade.

What’s interesting, is to see which areas have the worst problem.

We can see the failure rate was much higher in Manchester at 22.3 %, Southwark, South London at 22.2 %, Hull at 20.5 %, Knowsley, Merseyside at 20.4 %, Leicester at 20 %, Nottingham at 19.9 % and Southampton at 19.3 %.

Prospects were also poor in Sandwell, West Midlands, where the odds of failing were 18.1 %, and Islington, North London with 17.1 %.

By contrast, just 1.7 % failed to reach the benchmark in Rutland, 2.7 % in Kensington and Chelsea, and none in the Isles of Scilly.

These figures, released under the Freedom of Information Act ( FoI), will trigger fresh concern about the prospects for white boys from poor homes, amid claims many will be shut out of University and top jobs.

Christine Gilbert, the Chief Inspector of Schools, has warned their futures are ‘blighted’ by low attainment.

Poor GCSE performance has been linked to poverty at home, living in a deprived area, and changing schools during GCSE year – often as a result of parents divorcing.

Professor Alan Smithers, an education expert at Buckingham University said: ‘The really interesting result is just how many white boys are not getting five GCSEs.

‘It’s not hard to achieve that after 11 years of schooling. If they can’t it says something very important about how our education system is failing their needs.’

Indeed Professor Smithers makes a very good point but as usual, refuses to acknowledge the real reason for this failure.

As any Nationalist knows, the areas where the problem is worst, are those where whites are now a minority and in which, schools are swamped with students who speak little or no English.

As teachers spend a lot of time dealing with non English speaking students and government focus is on helping minorities, it’s not surprising that indigenous students are paying a heavy price.

Also it’s worth remembering that a lack of discipline is making the problem worse.

Finally, there is something in that article that deserve more attention.

It’s worth nothing that in Kensington & Chelsea only 2.7% of white students failed to get GCSEs, even if whites there are a minority.

The reason might be, that in the Royal Borough there are plenty of Private and Independent schools that are partially free from government interference and the Politically Correct indoctrination that is doing so much damage to State run schools.

This is a place where there are many rich parents willing to pay a lot of money to ensure their children get the best education, something working class families can only dream of.

One of them is Dagenham Labour MP Jon Cruddas.

Mr Cruddas, so keen to portray himself as a left-winger, refuses to send his children to a school in Barking & Dagenham, probably because he doesn’t want them to be in contact with troublesome working class teenagers who make life a misery for other students and he doesn’t believe his children would get a good education in any of the B & D’schools.

Diane Abbott springs to mind as well, and of course our dear ex leader, Mr Blair. I am sure you can think of a few more Champagne Socialists who think a State education is not good enough for the next generation of porkers.

You couldn’t make it up.

GUISSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Today newspapers reported.

A woman, seven months pregnant was “orally raped” at gunpoint by three robbers who burst into her London home.

The 33-year-old was watching TV with her boyfriend when the men struck at 10.30pm.

Her boyfriend, 39, was clubbed about the head and threatened with a sawn-off shotgun as the gang demanded the keys to their Audi TT car.

One of the men grabbed the woman and took her upstairs where she was forced to commit a sex act which police described as “oral rape”.

The assailant threatened to shoot her and her boyfriend if she did not do as she was told. The men then stole a mobile phone, iPod, cash, debit cards and laptop and escaped in the Audi parked outside the couple’s home in Finsbury Park.

Unfortunately violent crimes like this are now commonplace.

What is enlightening is the description of the suspects.
The man who carried out the “oral rape” is described as black, 6ft tall, aged 18 to 25 and stocky. He wore a black balaclava, black jacket and black tracksuit bottoms.

A second man was black or Asian, 5ft 6ins and about 18. He wore light grey tracksuit bottoms, black trainers and a zip-up jacket with red sleeves.

The third suspect, who wielded the gun, was black, 5ft 10ins, and aged between 18 and 22. He was wearing burgundy tracksuit bottoms.

Two men were caught on CCTV outside a mini-market at the corner of Seven Sisters Road and Durham Road in Holloway 10 minutes before the attack.

Now it will be interesting to find out if those three assailants were born in this country, are here illegally, or asylum seekers?

One of the uncomfortable truths is, that the greater proportion of violent crimes in London are carried out by immigrants, yet no one dare talk about it. The illiberal elite in charge of this country try to silence us by branding anyone who speaks the truth as racist.

The fact remains that this awful, and demeaning act may have been carried out by people who are not supposed to be here in the first place, a fact worth remembering, as government is forcing us to accept an ever increasing number of immigrants and threats of prosecution for anyone who complain about it.

The British National Party is not afraid to tell the truth about immigration, so it is incumbent on us to describe this as one of the negative effects brought upon this country by the disastrous policies implemented by Labour and Conservative governments in the last 50 odd years.

This is why it’s time for Nationalists to act, and direct their anger toward the mayor of London Boris Johnson, Barking MP Margaret Hodge, and Dagenham MP Jon Cruddas.

This wicked trio are but the latest generation of those responsible for these, and other crimes, (violent or otherwise) committed by immigrants and they must bear the consequences of their decisions.

They want to give an amnesty to the 1 million or so illegal immigrants living in London, increase the number of foreigners allowed to live and work in the UK, and won’t miss an opportunity to threaten anyone who disagrees with their plan.

Not all the immigrants are criminal but almost all our elected politicians in Westminster are.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Mass immigration is a worldwide phenomenon and no country is immune. Therefore it’s not surprising that even China is having to deal with diversity.

Unlike the UK, Chinese authorities are not ruled by politically correct zealots and they have no trouble in enforcing immigration rules to preserve their country. It may explain why no British newspaper is reporting the situation, as if they did either they’d have to say that the Chinese Communist Party are a bunch of racist scum or that they are only applying common sense policies but then they’d have to admit that also the BNP is talking common sense.

As clearly this would undermine their massive smear campaign they clearly decided to ignore this story.

Luckily the liberal reporters of the New York Times still maintain their reputation gained in the past for investigative journalism and thanks to them we can have an insight of this phenomenon.

Sweating heavily and yelling at Chinese police officers, a group of Nigerians dragged the lifeless body of an injured compatriot up to a Guangzhou police station, blood dripping from a deep gash on his head.

Around them, a crowd of over one hundred Africans chanted, some holding sticks as others smashed potted plants and blocked traffic, demanding justice from the Chinese police after officers chased the man out of a high-rise window in a tightening security crackdown on illegal overstayers in the city this year.

“They don’t like black people to stay in China any more. They want us to go,” said Frank, one of the Nigerians at the protest on July 15 that was filmed by witnesses.

“They treat us like animals,” added Frank, an illegal overstayer, who wouldn’t give his name for fear of reprisals.

The spontaneous protest — a rare direct confrontation between foreigners and authorities in China — is a vivid reminder of the challenges faced by Beijing’s stability-obsessed Communist Party as it engages with the world and builds up trade links abroad.

In the past few years, tens of thousands of African and Arab traders have thronged to export hubs like Guangzhou and Yiwu in eastern China to seek their fortunes — sourcing cheap China-made goods back home to massive markups in a growing, lucrative trade.

But just as mass Chinese immigration abroad has fanned recent social tensions in Africa and other places, the influx of large numbers of foreigners, particularly Africans, into China is altering the social fabric of cities like Guangzhou and proving a headache to authorities.

While this rising tide of foreigners has brought vast economic gains, the edgy cosmopolitanism of melding cultures and liberal ideals has been laced with racial and social tensions, along with the problem of illegal overstayers resorting to crime.

“While most black people are engaged in valuable trading activities, others are staying illegally, working without valid permits or smuggling,” said Peng Peng, the research director of the Guangzhou Academy of Social Sciences, a provincial thinktank.

“How to manage this is becoming a very big problem.”

and the article continues:

While Africans have moved to other cosmopolitan Chinese cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Beijing, those in Guangzhou are most conspicuous — filling the streets in a district known as “Little Africa” replete with ethnic shops, eateries, and export malls crammed with all manner of goods including fake designer jeans, wigs, bright African textiles and VCD players.

But the influx has also caused unease among local Chinese.

Some neighbourhood committees bar Africans from living in residential complexes, while Internet forums such as Tianya buzz with heated, at times xenophobic, discussions of “black person” issues in the city.

“A lot of Chinese don’t like Africans, but there’s nothing we can do. They’re flooding into Guangzhou,” wrote one blogger on Tianya. Others blamed the immigrants for problems from drug peddling and petty theft, to the spread of HIV among prostitutes.

On the streets, while explicit racism is rare among conservative Chinese urbanites, fights do sometimes break out between Africans and Chinese over business disputes.

“Racial stereotypes on both sides do exist … it’s indicative of starkly different cultures,” said Martyn Davies, a China expert at South Africa’s Stellenbosch University.

“The challenge of the whole China-Africa relationship is going to be cultural acceptance … It’s not about capital or management skill or whatever, it’s about culture and essentially to break down stereotypes they have of one another.”

One concern is the difficulty to get visa extension so Africans, rather than leaving China, prefer to remain there illegally.

The lesson that the ruling liberal elite fail to grasp is that forcing an ethnically homogeneous population to accept immigrants from different ethnic groups can only create tensions as people want to live in places that are not enriched. After all it is what rich, white-hating liberals do.

Think about Jon Cruddas or Margaret Hodge; they allowed Barking & Dagenham to be swamped against the will of local residents but they stay away from there. This is true for the UK as well as China.

Chinese don’t see any value in diversity, and rightly they don’t want to be a minority in their own country and to become second class citizens. Of course many can argue that this is too far fetched as Chinese population is about 1.4bn. Unfortunately not, Britons were saying the same things 40 years ago when the first Afro-Caribbeans disembarked in the UK. No one then could believe that Britain would become the multiracial hell-hole it’s now.

Hopefully Chinese government won’t allow this and the BNP will soon get powerful enough to push for a change.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Nothing damages the British economy more than EU regulations.

Rules drafted by unaccountable, unelected bureaucrats in Brussels are responsible for the loss of the manufacturing sector, the disappearance of the fishery industry and the destruction of farming.

At a time when rising food prices demand  more productive agriculture, the opposite is happening. The latest blow came from an EU directive that, if implemented, may reduce the production of potatos by a sixth.

According to The Scotsman:

UP TO a sixth of the UK’s potato production could be lost as a result of an EU directive on pesticides, an expert said yesterday.

Rob Clayton, of the Potato Council, based his warning on the effects of removing several chemicals essential in keeping pests and diseases, such as blight, slugs and eelworm at bay.

Speaking at the main potato research event outside Dundee, he said the loss of a single major pesticide used in the control of eelworm could cost the industry more than £50 million a year in reduced production.

A similar scale of loss was estimated if slugs were not controlled. And withdrawing one chemical used to fight potato blight could reduce the UK crop by 10 per cent on its own.

Despite its reduced budget, the Potato Council is co-ordinating research not only around the UK but also in other potato growing countries. Fiona Fell, chair of the knowledge transfer committee, said: “We are being much smarter in using the money we have for research.”

One of the biggest problems for growers of the humble spud is the damage that blight can cause. Over the past 200 years, many a crop has been left devastated by this bacterial disease and only in the past 50 years has the grower had a chemical means of controlling it.

“We are really under pressure with blight now,” she said. “We have a new strain coming in that attacks crops two weeks earlier than normal and we have a real battle with late blight attacking the crop just before it ripens.

“That means we have at least two additional sprays to add to a normal control programme.”

Perhaps there is a good reason to ban this pesticide, but the problem is that those who drafted this rule are people who live outside the UK and maybe they don’t have the slightest knowledge of agriculture.

This is another result of the sell out of British sovereignty carried out by the previous Labour and Conservative governments, acts of treason for which ordinary people are paying an heavy price.

It’s not clear if this decision is daft or made deliberately to suit the interests of powerful business groups, what is clear is that the poorest will be at higher risk of starving, as they may not be able to afford to pay more for potatos.

But don’t expect marxists like Harriet Harman, Ed Milliband, Margaret Hodge or Jon Cruddas to do something about that, they have only contempt for the people they claim to represent.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share