Tag Archive | "margaret hodge"

Nick Griffin elected Vice-President of the AENM

Nick Griffin elected Vice-President of the AENM

A few days ago we reported that the Alliance of European Nationalist Movements (AENM), a pan-European party made up of nationalist parties have chosen to work together at a European level.

On the 16th and 17th of June, the AENM held its first General Assembly in Strasbourg.

The Chairman Bruno Gollnisch set up the agenda and drew the position the AENM will take in the near future. The General Assembly then proceeded to renew the “Bureau”, the political leadership of the party namely, the President (Bruno Gollnisch), Vice-President (Nick Griffin), Treasurer (Bela Kovacs) and General Secretary (Valerio Cignetti).

The assembly then deliberated on the enlargement of the party by accepting applications from the “Partido Nacional Renovador” and “Nationaldemokraterna” to join the AENM increasing the total number of represented Nations to nine.

The full list of the members is now:

- Front National (France)

- Jobbik (Hungary)

- Fiamma Tricolore (Italy)

- British National Party (Great Britain)

- Svoboda (Ukraine)

- Movimiento Social Republicano (Spain)

- Front National du Belgique (Belgium)

- Partido Nacional Renovador (Portugal)

- Nationaldemokraterna (Sweden)

The appointment of Nick Griffin as Vice-President is an acknowledgment of his talent and his dedication to nationalism.

Mr Griffin is well known outside Britain and many party leaders in Europe respect him for turning the BNP into the most feared political party in Britain.

How effective the AENM will be is difficult to judge, but if Mr Griffin in his new position of Vice President can replicate, even in a small way what he has achieved for the BNP, you can expect shockwaves across the EU.

So should nationalists thank Margaret Hodge?

Her landslide victory gave our Chairman more time to concentrate on the new AENM project, and make an even bigger impact at the European level.

Mrs Hodge urged BNP members to pack their bags and leave, and this is what Mr Griffin did: he left Barking to go to Brussels and Strasbourg where he will stay until 2014.

How does the old saying go?
“Be careful what you wish for”?

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in BNPComments (9)

How the BNP is shaping the political agenda

How the BNP is shaping the political agenda

Since the somewhat disappointing results of 6th May, the MSM has been happily crowing that the British National Party is now gone for good.

It’s a lie of course, and nationalists will be pleased to know that under the radar the BNP is shaping political agenda in the three main parties.

A few days ago we reported that a debate is taking place in left-wing circles about the need for the Labour party to get tougher on immigration.

Also Margaret Hodge, in an article published on the Daily Telegraph, after throwing her usual bile on us, she admitted, the only effective way to stop the BNP is by introducing a better system for rationing housing and benefits, with priority for those who have lived in an area for longest.

Now what is interesting about her comment is that no one attacked Mrs Hodge for pandering to the fascist BNP, let’s not forget she was rapped a few years ago when she suggested the council houses should be given only to people who lived in a borough for a very long time.

Clearly the Labour party are well aware that many voters agree with us on those issues, and they cannot ignore them because they know full well the BNP is still around and could get more votes in the future from those disillusioned voters.

A similar thing is happening in the Conservative party.

Broxbourne Tory MP Charles Walker has recently warned that uncontrolled immigration could lead to a rise in support for the far right. (not that the BNP is “far” right)

Speaking in the House of Commons Mr Walker said that while his constituents were “fair-minded, decent and compassionate people” he added “uncontrolled immigration is not an unalloyed good for everyone”.

He said: “Broxbourne constituent want skilled workers coming to this country who can add to the wealth of this country and pay taxes that help to support hospitals, schools and infrastructure. My constituents also want to provide genuine sanctuary to those who are in genuine fear for their lives. However, we have to recognise in this place that uncontrolled immigration is not an unalloyed good for everyone.”

He added: “Immigration tends to work very well for the middle and upper classes, but many of my constituents are competing for scarce public resources, such as education, health, transport and housing. That has created a level of concern and bad feeling which has caused me a great deal of concern, because in my constituency and others we still see the British National Party getting a foothold and gaining traction.”

He went on to congratulate Labour MPs Jon Cruddas and Margaret Hodge who “had such fantastic results against the British National party, not only turning back Nick Griffin, the leader of that party, but ensuring that night that many BNP councillors lost their seats”.

Mr Walker called for progress against the far right to continue, but said: “If we are to do so, our constituents need to know that we are serious about addressing their concerns.”

To put everything in perspective in Broxbourne the BNP candidate Steve McCole got 4.73% against the 58.79% obtained by Mr Walker.

No one would make a fuss about those figures, this is after all a safe Tory seat and our presence would have been unnoticed.

Instead we see an MP with a comfortable majority panicking about a party that got less that 5% and admitting (albeit indirectly) that state-sponsored harassment and smears will not stop us.

The fact that Mr Walker is scared of us says a lot about our power and the way we are influencing the political debate, thus dismissing the claim made by MSM that the BNP has been defeated for good.

As for addressing voters concerns, a good start would be to state, clearly, that the Conservatives are not only opposed to an amnesty for illegal immigrants, but also that they will kick them out of the country.

Don’t hold your breath, after all one of the most ardent supporter of that amnesty is Boris Johnson and no one from the Conservative party told him to shut up.

Soon voters will realize that Tories are now a carbon copy of the Labour party and more of them will support us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in Immigration, Misc, PoliticsComments (12)

Barking MP Margaret Hodge on ‘hit list’

Barking MP Margaret Hodge on ‘hit list’

In the Barking and Dagenham Post is an interesting story that has been so far been ignored by the MSM.

According to the east London-based newspaper security fears were raised after Barking MP Margaret Hodge was among four east London MPs found on a suspected terrorist hit list.

The members of parliament have all been offered advice and assistance by the police following the revelation, according to a national news website.

The news comes less than two weeks after the knife attack on Newham MP Stephen Timms, he was stabbed during a constituency surgery in Kingsford Way, Beckton.

He spent five days recovering in hospital and has now been discharged. The attack is being treated as a terrorist investigation.

A spokesperson for Mrs Hodge said he couldn’t comment on the hit list claim, but confirmed the Barking MP’s surgery last Friday was moved from Parsloes Avenue, Dagenham to the DABD centre in Ripple Road, Barking due to security concerns.

But he said there would be no change to any future surgeries.

He added: “It’s business as usual. What happened to Stephen Timms was food for thought but it won’t put Margaret off. She wants to make herself as available to the public as possible.”

So who are those terrorists that have Mrs Hodge in their sights?

Even if the details provided so far, are few there is no doubt they are Muslim extremists who want to punish “infidel” politicians for the death and suffering of their Muslim brothers in the middle east.

Both Margaret Hodge and Stephen Timms supported the illegal and immoral war in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they are to blame for the death of hundreds of British soldiers and the deaths of many innocent people in a conflict that has nothing to do with us.

In addition to this they also supported an open-door immigration policy which allowed huge numbers of people into the UK despite the fact some of them are a security threat, therefore it was only a matter of time before some Muslims who came here (maybe illegally or claiming asylum) began plotting to kill British MPs.

The British National Party has been saying for a long time that the only way to prevent terrorism is by stopping mass immigration and avoid fighting wars in countries that are not in our interest, but they never listen do they?

What goes around comes around.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in Immigration, Law/Order, MiscComments (11)

Should Labour become an anti-immigration party?

Should Labour become an anti-immigration party?

If you believe the MSM you may well think that the British National Party is gone for good.

Well this is not the case, and it may explain why Margaret Hodge, almost a month after she said it is time for BNP members in Barking & Dagenham to pack up and leave. In the Daily Telegraph she feels the need to write an article explaining why the only way to defeat the BNP is through open debate.
[1]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/bnp/7776363/How-to-beat-the-BNP-and-make-sure-they-dont-come-back.html

Nationalists may find her intervention upsetting but the fact that she was forced to write such an article in the first place shows that the BNP are now a political force powerful enough to make the three other parties confront issues like immigration that they have neglected for too long.

Indeed a debate is going on in left-wing circles about the need for Labour to be tougher on immigration.

David Goodhart, editor of Prospect magazine, argues that Labour must become an anti-immigration party and it uses good arguments that should resonate with anyone claiming to represent the interests of the working class.
[2] http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/05/18/labour-must-become-the-anti-immigration-party-david-goodhart/

However the split in the ranks of NuLabour are apparent when we read this from Daniel Trilling in the New Statesman disagreeing from his cloud cuckoo land with Mr Goodhart.

According to Mr Trilling Barking has experienced a relatively low level of immigration compared to the rest of London. And nationally, support for the BNP is strongest in areas with low, rather than high numbers of immigrants. (of course it is strongest in less enriched areas, immigrants won’t vote for the goose that lays the eggs will they you idiot.)
[3] http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/05/immigration-labour-bnp

This position is echoed by Anders Lustgarten, the author of the play “A day at the racists”

According to Mr Lustgarten the cheap labour of some of those people, immigrants, was a key element of New Labour’s “economic miracle”, yet the state never acknowledged the role they played — so when times went bad, nobody remembered what they had done to make them good. Instead, Miliband, Balls, Burnham et al seem intent on scapegoating immigrants to distract us from the real causes of hardship.
[4] http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/05/touch-labour-immigration-shows

Clearly he doesn’t know what the word hardship means but nationalists can take comfort from the fact that those left-wing intellectuals, with all their nonsense words, and detachment from the real world, can only help the cause of nationalism because ordinary people that have suffered 13 years of Labour misrule will surely feel insulted and offended by their claim that immigration is good for them.

Of course Labour will never be tough on immigration or the cause of immigration and will never listen to people, but the fact that such a debate is taking place means that the BNP is becoming more powerful by the day and many in the Labour party are feeling the pressure we are putting on them.

ps: Compare the comments in the Telegraph article and the ones in The New Statesman, even the lefties are worried about mass immigration. We are not going away you Fabianites, you will be exposed for what you are. Traitors!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in Immigration, MiscComments (2)

Margaret Hodge proclaims the new age of arrogance!

Margaret Hodge proclaims the new age of arrogance!

From the blogsite of AM Richard Barnbrook.

http://www.richardbarnbrook.com/

Margaret Hodge’s comments on the election platform to fellow BNP contender Nick Griffin are an indication of the arrogance of New-Labour now that they have attained what is in effect a one-party state here in Barking and Dagenham.
Regrettably, despite all prior indications, she won! But her arrogant and gloating response to Nick at the very moment of her victory that the BNP should ‘pack their bags and go!’ was ill-judged and ungracious, to put it kindly. Let me make it clear now, we have no intention whatsoever of packing up and leaving this borough. In fact our intentions are to dig in, and on every occasion, we will contest Labour by petitioning, being active and focusing on the real concerns and issue that affect the good people of Barking and Dagenham.
What she didn’t see fit to take into account was that the BNP vote showed a marked increase on that attained in the last election. Over 6000 people voted for Nick. That’s a lot of people, if you tried to squeeze them all into the village hall! And we got our votes by legitimate means. Some people are wondering how the Labour party got theirs! But then rumours are only rumours, aren’t they? Like some that still persist in maintaining that rampant knife-crime doesn’t happen.
Many will be observing future political developments in Barking and Dagenham with great interest. Because now, Labour have managed to attain unprecedented success in taking every single council seat and have set up what is in effect, a one party state, which does not reflect the true will of the electorate, by any means. From whichever end of the political spectrum one views this, such a totalitarian state of affairs can’t be healthy. Indeed, for Labour to now be in a position of such unchallenged power is very concerning.
As for Margaret Hodge, she too will have her day. Her record as a politician is far from unblemished. And she is a member of the liberal political elite, all of whom have no real affinity with the people that they represent. It is only a question of time until the electorate see through her. Because it’s true as they say- you can take in some of the people some of the time. But you can’t dupe all the people all the time!

Posted in London BNP, PoliticsComments (6)

How many councillors in Barking and Dagenham are BNP?

How many councillors in Barking and Dagenham are BNP?

You know it’s election time when newspapers ramp up the printing of anti BNP articles in the vain attempt to convince people not to vote for us.

It has become an established ritual, the treacherous political elite running this country is very afraid of our electoral success, because it means they will be observed from inside the chamber, their plan to destroy Britain and create the NWO will be exposed by our newly elected MPs.

The recent articles published in the Daily Mail and Daily Telegraph are not worth comment, they don’t add anything that nationalists haven’t already read.

Nonetheless it’s still interesting to see how the quality of the journalists writing for them is so low it makes me wonder if they wrote the articles themselves or copied and pasted material written by some antifascist high on dope.

An example of this can be found in the Daily Telegraph, Tanya Gold gives an account of the BNP day of action in Barking last Saturday.

The article is biased against the BNP of course, but that will surprise no one.

However there is a quote that alone will make voters think twice before believing all the negative stories about the BNP:

“Nick Griffin is standing here against Margaret Hodge, the Labour Minister of State for Culture and Tourism (majority: 8,883). It is a stunt. But it is possible that Barking and Dagenham could soon have a BNP-controlled council. It is now the second largest party at local level with 15 seats and they aim to take absolute control; along with Stoke, this borough is the centre of BNP hopes. ”

Did you notice anything?

Yes, according to Mrs Gold we have 15 seats in Barking & Dagenham.

Now anyone knows how hardworking BNP activists are but they are still unable to perform miracles and increase the number of councillors from 12 to 15 before the election.

Anyone can look at the Barking & Dagenham’ website and see how many councillors we have so the fact that this mistake could be printed unproofed says a lot about the quality of Daily Telegraph’ reporters.

If this is the standard of journalism expected from the DT, why do people believe all the negative stuff printed about the BNP when they can’t get the number of councillors right?

Maybe Andrew Gilligan should look at this, after all he is trying to convince people that we are a bunch of useless idiots (nothing like the NUJ though).

I have said before we must invent a Pulitzer price for stupidity, and award it to the writer of the silliest story of the year.

You couldn’t make it up.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in PoliticsComments (4)

D’Ancona At It Again!

D’Ancona At It Again!

The self-appointed, pompous and sententious Mathew D’Ancona loves any excuse to stick his verbal knife in the BNP’s ribs and whitter on in vitriolic and baseless attack, endlessly, in hugely self-important style as if he and only he is suddenly the guardian of Britain’s Social Conscience.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23805912-beware-the-bnp-has-never-been-more-dangerous.do

This time around, his focus is the BNP’s fairly natural decision to admit non-Caucasian members: always remembering that this perhaps un-natural decision was forced by the threat of legal action from that bastion of Left Wing Ideology and wannabe creators of NuLab’s Pie-in-the-Sky Utopian egalitarian multicultural Shangri La, the Equality and Human Rights Commission: you know, that cumbersome monolith determined to destroy the remnants of what was a once proud and great nation.

D’Ancona meanders on, foaming at the mouth about BNP’s security apparat: and thereafter maintains the party has never lost in roots in knuckle dragging Neanderthals etc: well, Mathew, I don’t know if you have been out for a pint, lately, but since you proudly boast you reside in London’s East End, then you will probably have noticed that most pubs these days boast a couple of your specimen Neanderthals on the door: let’s face it, any publicised BNP private event becomes the instant target for a would-be invasion from those well behaved groups such as the UAF Rent-A-Mob!

Now such as the UAF were seen, for example, trying anything to storm the BBC hallowed portals when Nick Griffin appeared on question time: and this bag of scruffy, quasi-literate unshaven, body-pierced, heavily tattooed cagoule-wearing misfits are not actually the precise type one would want to take home to meet Mum for tea!

However, in the spavined and myopic gaze of the superior being, D’Ancona, no doubt their sartorial eccentricities and lack of ablutionary exercise can be ignored in the common cause of perpetuating the Ivory Tower miasmic fantasies of the Bleeding Heart Lefty Do-Gooders.

This constant denigration of BNP and its membership and repetition by the far left of the skinhead dramas of days of yore, flies in the face of example: France became so mired in party politics for the pure sake of politics and self-elevation by politicians, that in 2002, Jean Marie Le Pen chased Chirac into second place in the first round of the presidential election! Chirac polling 5.6 million and Le Pen, 4.8 votes.

Must we then conclude that France is a nation of knuckle-draggers?

Far from it; it is now a far more cultured and stable country than Britain!

In an earlier critique of Mr D’Ancona’s nonsensical rant, I suggested he wake up and smell the coffee: the core-reason so many seriously consider voting BNP is simply because they are wholly disenfranchised, ignored, disregarded and marginalized by a political system in meltdown: yet simultaneously, expected to shoulder the lion’s share of the taxation burden which enables it!

This ignorant scribe then goes on to one again recount the utter myths of the benefits of what he calls “Economic Migration”: and avers Britain is a sort of temporary refuge: a place where the vision and essential national structure never actually existed: and then whitters away, listing a string of immigrant groups who “made” Britain.

As one who can proudly trace his antecedents to Tudor England, I personally take grave exception to such calumny!

His ignorance of British social and ethnic history and the specific history of migration to these shores is absolutely astounding in its fallaciousness!

He reels off racial groups such as Jews, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, Normans and even Huguenots: however, as always with these attempted and facile attempts at justification he misses four critically important points. First most of this migration was archaic; second, the incomers brought economically important craft skills – the Huguenots, for example bringing essential abilities for the time, in gold and silver smithing, metal working, weaving and leather working; next, they all integrated, learned the local language and added to it.

Finally, there is the little matter of time scale.

The mass migration we have suffered since it’s beginning in the late 1960s, accelerated throughout the 1970s: and reached its unsustainable peak once NuLab came to power, from 1997 onwards: to the point where over 30% of people living in London were not born in Britain!

Passing through the Clapton-Beck concert, D’Ancona then illustrates his utter total slavering ignorance of the roots and genesis of modern popular music: desperately trying to award absolute accreditation to Black music and musicians!

Neatly bypassing Appalachian folk roots and how these owed their true origin to Irish and Scottish immigrants way back when.

More study necessary, D’Ancona! See me after class!

Finally he turns to his heroine: the oleaginous and obnoxious Margaret Hodge and his fear she will probably be unseated at the next general election in Barking.

We can only hope so!

What is apparent to me, is how many people from all social, income and political backgrounds are much tempted by the BNP as a cogent and logical optional choice for their vote: let’s face it, there is little, in truth to chose between Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon mate Twee Georgie Osbourne, the vacuous Nick Clegg and his coterie of Pinko Bleeding Hearts or what now passes as Labour. All of these professional politicians seek self-preference, power and a chance at the financial feeding trough of state.

For the voter and tax payer they have little if any respect: the only persons they do respect are those who throw large amounts of cash their way in return for influence and special interest legislation!

Those vacillating voters need urgently to emerge from the closet, stand up and be counted: if not, then this once proud nation, debt-ridden, collapsed infrastructure and socially, increasingly mired in effective anarchy and chaos, will simply descend finally into the morass of insignificance and become precisely what such as D’Ancona fear: a sort of Third World Fascist Banana Republic, where the rich become ever richer and remote; and the poor and previously middle-class, live cheek-by-jowl in a Devil take the Hindmost sewer.

Charles Hinchliffe

Posted in BNP, PoliticsComments (5)

Panic in Barking

Panic in Barking

From our friends at Wigan Patriot:

Nick Griffin’s decision to stand against Margaret Hodge really seems to have ruffled her feathers.
She is now to some degree copying BNP policies which she has up to now deemed racist, and recognising the resentment of voters in the unfettered immigration policies of her government and their treatment of British people as seciond class citizens.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1248364/Margaret-Hodge-says-migrants-EARN-benefits-takes-BNP.html

She says it is time “to lance the boil” of growing discontent over the wave of economic migrants entering our country.
No Margaret it is time to “lance the boil” of New Labour your corrupt party which has presided over the most disastrous demographic changes in 10,000 years of British history for purely party reasons, not to mention bankrupting the country while borrowing £billions to give away in foreign aid and the EU.

If you did not see this self inflicted disaster you should have, or were you shielded from people’s views by your draconian PC speech laws which prevented people from speaking out for fear of being criminalised for being “racist”?
To paraphrase Nick Griffin “you can prevent us from speaking out but you can not control the way we think”
Your “vibrant, diverse multicultural society” is turning to bite you on your fat bottom which has been thus far shielded from reality by your champagne socialist lifestyle paid for by us.

You had no mandate to impose these changes on us and have sought to silence us by dubious legal practices and depriving us of our historical right to free speech.
Now you and your slimy party will reap the whirlwind and slither into oblivion.
It seems however you may just survive as the Tories have offered you a lifeline (how ironic a loony lefty like you being offered help by the Tories) It just shows how alike, treacherous and anti British both your parties are.

After the next election and the Tories get in they will be no better as their policies are identical to yours and our support will grow as a result.
The following election will be our BIG breakthrough when we will be able to begin the task of rebuilding our country culturally and financially.

The danger is that civil unrest will lead to conflict between the multiple groups and allegiances you have encouraged here, as you can’t have a united and a diverse country at the same time. They are incompatible at opposite ends of the spectrum.

Let’s hope the people have enough patience to go through the coming hard times until a party,the BNP which has the interests of the British people as a priority comes to power.

In the meantime, even without MPs we are having an influence on government thinking even if it is only an attempt to save their subsidised skins.

A BNP vote is thus proved again to be worth more than a vote for any other party as it really makes them sit up even if we do not get in.

Posted in London BNPComments (2)

Labour Barking and Dagenham: How Scared are They?

Labour Barking and Dagenham: How Scared are They?

I received this little gem recently which again shows how Labour and its paid agents seek to mobilise the Labour vote by whipping up fear and by playing the race card to their advantage. This particular organisation has occupied Council premises for a long time and received considerable cash grants in the tens of thousands. Labour pays these groups and supposed community leaders cash incentives to keep their people in line and to ensure they vote Labour at every election. Margaret Hodge has often said she does not need the ‘white working class vote’ because she has the immigrant vote. Well they have to a degree as they spend millions of pounds every year on organisations like these to help them prop that vote up. Gordon Brown and his fascist Labour Party plays the tune and the immigrants dance……

Dear All

Following the announcement by Nick Griffin the leader of the Fascist and Racist British National Party (BNP) to contest the parliamentary seat of Barking, the Leadership of the Ethnic Minorities Partnership Agency (EMPA) is making a clarion call to all its member groups and other Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic (BAME) community leaders in Barking and Dagenham to team up with EMPA and other like bodies to galvanise the BAME voters to go out and vote in their numbers in the May 2010 General and Local Elections.

EMPA takes the announcement and the threat of the presence of the BNP Leader in Barking during the electioneering period leading to the May 2010 General and Local Election seriously. The BAME communities in Barking and Dagenham should rightly be ready to face both the challenges of Nick Griffin’s presence in the borough and also the local council seats that are up for grasp, where the BNP is seeking to increase its number of seats..

EMPA knows too well the consequences of a BNP controlled local authority and a BNP Member (s) of Parliament for Barking and Dagenham for the minority communities in Barking and Dagenham. If the 2006 local elections in Barking and Dagenham where the BNP got 12 seats is anything to go by, then the announcement and threat by the Fascist and Racist BNP Leader is serious and cannot be ignored.

Just as the BNP is determined to get a foothold in Barking and Dagenham and to continue to spread their messages of fascism, racism and hate, EMPA, the BAME communities and good indigenous people of Barking and Dagenham should equally be determined to flush them out of the borough into the sea. This can only be done through a collective, determined and sustained campaign of getting the minorities votes out on elections day. The evidence of the 2006 local elections showed that the BNP won the 12 local council seats due to the fact the minorities voters did not come out in their numbers to vote.

EMPA believes that task to get rid off the BNP in Barking and Dagenham in the May 2010 General and Local Elections is achievable, and “Yes We Can”, but the biggest challenges are complacency and voter apathy on the part of the minorities’ voters; and that is why EMPA is making the clarion call to urge its member groups and other minority community leaders to start now with the anti BNP messages into the BAME homes and communities and together we can get rid of the BNP from Barking and Dagenham.

The central message to EMPA members and other BAME leaders is don’t agonise, organise.

Thank you

For and on behalf

Tariq Saeed

Chair, David Ayinne, Director, Ethnic Minorities Partnership Agency (EMPA)

1 Wheelers Cross, Kingsbridge, Barking, Essex, IG11 7EE, T: 0208 507 3477

Email: info@empa.org.uk Website: www.empa.org.uk

Posted in PoliticsComments (4)

Jon Cruddas’ reaction to the article I wrote about him.

Jon Cruddas’ reaction to the article I wrote about him.

After I named and shamed Jon Cruddas on this blog I emailed him to let him know about my article.

This was his reply:

“Good for you mate, tell bill bailey that our little conversation on Sunday has clearly been overtaken by events”

I don’t know what conversation Councillor Robert Bailey had him but how you can see he poked fun at me.

To put things into perspective when last year I made a similar complaint to all the councillors in Bexley, they contacted the borough Police commander and made clear they didn’t tolerate any attack on BNP activists.

Of course the reason for such zeal was that a few weeks before our candidate Michael Barnbrook missed a by-election victory by 8 votes in a ward were Conservatives used to have a strong majority.

Nonetheless they deserve credit for taking my complaint seriously, something Jon Cruddas didn’t do.

The way he behaved proves he supports violence against BNP activists, this is the only way for him to stay in power and milk more money from hard-working taxpayers.

So if someone is abused or assaulted in Barking & Dagenham he is the person to blame and the anger should be directed at him.

I repeat again, I blame Jon Cruddas and Margaret Hodge for the attack last week.

Jon Cruddas will be available to the voters on Friday the 20th of November at Dagenham Civic centre between 4pm-6pm.

Call 020 8984 7854 in case you need to book to meet him.

It will be interesting to see how he reacts if someone turns up to embarrass him.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

P.S. Not one of the Labour, Tory or Independent councillors from Barking & Dagenham has replied to me so far.

Posted in MiscComments (5)

More proof that Margaret Hodge holds her voters in contempt.

More proof that Margaret Hodge holds her voters in contempt.

Update on the attack at Becontree. As I have already said, I blame Labour politicians for the attack on 5th of November 2009 when one of a pack of black teenagers threw a glass bottle at me outside Becontree station.

I have posted the Crudass comment, this is the one from Margaret Hodge MP for Barking:

Dear Giuseppe De Santis

Your allegations are not offensive – they are merely daft. Mrs Hodge condemns all acts of anti-social and criminal behaviour regardless of who perpetrates them.

Mike Haywood
Head of Office
Rt Hon Margaret Hodge MP

You will have noticed that the email was written by one of her assistants, she probably didn’t read it at all.

Clearly she is too busy to look at the problems of people living in her constituency, and delegates this task to her assistants.

But this should surprise nobody.

A few years ago she said very clearly, Labour doesn’t need the support of the white-working class as immigrants will replace them as Labour voters.

It may explain why, when Ford closed the car factory in Dagenham she did nothing to protest against its closure and then told redundant factory workers they could stack shelves in Tesco.

When those neglected workers embraced the British National Party en-masse, she complained to the press expressing fear that 8 out of 10 whites would support the BNP.

After we had 12 councillors elected she and Jon Cruddas decided to swamp the borough with immigrants, something that is evident to anybody who lives in the Borough.

As the BNP grows in size, and could take control of Barking & Dagenham, she and Cruddas encourage by their inactivity, UAF thugs to intimidate BNP activists and urge them to use violence against us: This is why those black teenagers felt entitled to throw a glass bottle at me.

If Mrs Hodge condemns ‘acts of criminal behaviour’, why has she never blasted the UAF for allowing its thugs to assault BNP activists?

Why has she never stood in the cold collecting signatures for the campaign against knife-crime?

Richard Barnbrook did it a lot, and many who signed were black and asian, they could see that somebody who is called a “fascist and racist” was there to listen and cared about a problem that affects all communities.

We don’t need to comment further on that as we know the answer.

Like Jon Cruddas and others in the Labour party, she is deliberately engineering the destruction of this country for their own interest, and she treats her voters with contempt, but as those voters are starting to wake up she need something to intimidate them.

Let’s not forget that the woman who called BNP supporters fascist was council leader in Islington, covered up a paedophile ring who were abusing vulnerable children and were then put into care.

When this scandal emerged Mrs Hodge did nothing to help the authorities bring the culprits to justice, but attacked the victims claiming they were making up their stories.

This is the woman who is representing Barking, a bully who rubs shoulders with paedophiles, and allows all sort of foreign filth to move into the borough and make life a misery for law abiding people.

I make no apology for attacking her, she is unfit not just to be an MP, but to be in this country.

It’s time for her to face public outcry.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in Law/Order, Misc, Politics, SocietyComments (6)

Why Jon Cruddas supports political violence!

Why Jon Cruddas supports political violence!

As readers of  ’London Patriot’ will know, on Thursday the 5th of November 2009, one of a pack of black teenagers threw a glass bottle at me.

I have said before I don’t blame the black teenagers, I blame the Labour party for allowing their ancestors into our country in the first place.

Conveniently, it was revealed that in 2003 the ‘Home Office’ told immigration officers to fast track applications, even if this meant allowing dangerous or criminal foreigners entry to the UK.

This is why it’s time now to blame politicians for every crime carried out by people who shouldn’t be in this country in the first place.

One of these politicians is Dagenham MP Jon Cruddas.

He claims to represent the working class, but he lives in a posh flat in Notting Hill, places his children in an exclusive school, and has bought three homes by abusing the ACA. How representative is that?

He and Margaret Hodge have allowed Barking & Dagenham to become swamped with immigrants in order to stay in power by using their vote (gerrymandering).

When they realised there was a chance that the BNP could take control of Barking & Dagenham, they decided to use UAF thugs to attack and intimidate BNP activists and incite ordinary people to use violence against us. This is why the pack of black youths felt empowered to throw a glass bottle at me.

When I complained to Jon Cruddas he sent me the following reply:

“Mr de santis I am very sorry to hear of your distress and the violent act you were a victim of. Not sure why I am responsible though; I would never incite people to attack you lot (he can’t even bring himself to use BNP) and have been critical of some (but not all?) who have in the past- all the best- jon”

This is a lie, Mr Cruddas is a UAF supporter and regularly writes in the ‘Daily Mirror’, a newspaper working together with antifascist groups to campaign against the British National Party. These leftwing rags on more than one occasion have incited people to use violence against BNP activists, if he is so squeaky clean why does he support UAF thugs? Let him deny his allegiance to UAF.

Let’s not forget he was touted to become Labour’ deputy leader and minister but he gave up to concentrate his efforts in stopping the BNP.

I didn’t get any reply from Margaret Hodge or any other Barking & Dagenahm’ councillors but I’m not surprised, after all they never cared about white people living in the borough.

I make no apology for naming and shaming politicians in this blog, it is about time they paid for their crimes.

This is why I urge nationalists to direct their anger to them.

Their contact details are in the article I posted a few days ago:

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/11/07/black-teenager-throws-glass-bottle-at-bnp-activists/

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in BNP, Immigration, Law/Order, MiscComments (6)

Black teenager throws glass bottle at BNP activists.

Black teenager throws glass bottle at BNP activists.

I am very angry, I was a victim of a violent attack on Thursday the 5th of November 2009.

While waiting at Becontree station at 7 PM with Richard Barnbrook and 2 other BNP activists to start leafleting the area, on the other side of the road behind a plastic barrier (roadworks), there were roughly 12-15 black teenage guys loitering on the footpath. I think someone recognised Mr Barnbrook, one of them threw a glass bottle at us and it missed me by a few inches. After a few minutes of abuse from them a few went to the station, jumped the barrier without a ticket and the others ran away. Mr Barnbrook had called the police, who arrived 10-20 minutes later and tried (sic) to catch them in the tube.
Someone could have been badly injured and I am incandescent with rage.

I suspect that with news Nick Griffin may stand in B & D as a BNP candidate for the constituency, these attacks will grow in intensity. NuLabour has an awful lot to answer for.

They know the BNP has a very good chance of taking control in Barking & Dagenham and they clearly want to stop us by any means neccesary, as debate does not suit them, then physical violence is their preferred option.

They not only tolerate, but also push people from every ethnic background to intimidate and attack us with the clear aim of scaring our members and supporters (how wrong can they be?)
I’m also sure pressure is put on teachers to encourage students that anti-social behaviour and physical violence are tolerated so long as the targets are BNP activists.
Therefore, I lay blame at the feet of NuLabour and the other politicians of the Tripartite Alliance for this behaviour, and I urge every nationalist to vent his/her anger on our elected politicians.
A good start would be to complain to every Barking & Dagenham councillor ( except BNP ones of course).

Here is the link:

http://moderngov.barking-dagenham.gov.uk/mgMemberIndex.asp

Also sent a well phrased and coherent complaint to Margaret Hodge and Jon Cruddas:

http://www.parliament.uk/mpslordsandoffices/mps_and_lords/alms.cfm#C

They must now pay for their crimes.
We cannot tolerate treason anymore.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in MiscComments (20)

Another victim of immigration?

Another victim of immigration?

Today newspapers reported.

A woman, seven months pregnant was “orally raped” at gunpoint by three robbers who burst into her London home.

The 33-year-old was watching TV with her boyfriend when the men struck at 10.30pm.

Her boyfriend, 39, was clubbed about the head and threatened with a sawn-off shotgun as the gang demanded the keys to their Audi TT car.

One of the men grabbed the woman and took her upstairs where she was forced to commit a sex act which police described as “oral rape”.

The assailant threatened to shoot her and her boyfriend if she did not do as she was told. The men then stole a mobile phone, iPod, cash, debit cards and laptop and escaped in the Audi parked outside the couple’s home in Finsbury Park.

Unfortunately violent crimes like this are now commonplace.

What is enlightening is the description of the suspects.
The man who carried out the “oral rape” is described as black, 6ft tall, aged 18 to 25 and stocky. He wore a black balaclava, black jacket and black tracksuit bottoms.

A second man was black or Asian, 5ft 6ins and about 18. He wore light grey tracksuit bottoms, black trainers and a zip-up jacket with red sleeves.

The third suspect, who wielded the gun, was black, 5ft 10ins, and aged between 18 and 22. He was wearing burgundy tracksuit bottoms.

Two men were caught on CCTV outside a mini-market at the corner of Seven Sisters Road and Durham Road in Holloway 10 minutes before the attack.

Now it will be interesting to find out if those three assailants were born in this country, are here illegally, or asylum seekers?

One of the uncomfortable truths is, that the greater proportion of violent crimes in London are carried out by immigrants, yet no one dare talk about it. The illiberal elite in charge of this country try to silence us by branding anyone who speaks the truth as racist.

The fact remains that this awful, and demeaning act may have been carried out by people who are not supposed to be here in the first place, a fact worth remembering, as government is forcing us to accept an ever increasing number of immigrants and threats of prosecution for anyone who complain about it.

The British National Party is not afraid to tell the truth about immigration, so it is incumbent on us to describe this as one of the negative effects brought upon this country by the disastrous policies implemented by Labour and Conservative governments in the last 50 odd years.

This is why it’s time for Nationalists to act, and direct their anger toward the mayor of London Boris Johnson, Barking MP Margaret Hodge, and Dagenham MP Jon Cruddas.

This wicked trio are but the latest generation of those responsible for these, and other crimes, (violent or otherwise) committed by immigrants and they must bear the consequences of their decisions.

They want to give an amnesty to the 1 million or so illegal immigrants living in London, increase the number of foreigners allowed to live and work in the UK, and won’t miss an opportunity to threaten anyone who disagrees with their plan.

Not all the immigrants are criminal but almost all our elected politicians in Westminster are.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in SocietyComments (8)

African immigrants struggling in China

African immigrants struggling in China

africa1Mass immigration is a worldwide phenomenon and no country is immune. Therefore it’s not surprising that even China is having to deal with diversity.

Unlike the UK, Chinese authorities are not ruled by politically correct zealots and they have no trouble in enforcing immigration rules to preserve their country. It may explain why no British newspaper is reporting the situation, as if they did either they’d have to say that the Chinese Communist Party are a bunch of racist scum or that they are only applying common sense policies but then they’d have to admit that also the BNP is talking common sense.

As clearly this would undermine their massive smear campaign they clearly decided to ignore this story.

Luckily the liberal reporters of the New York Times still maintain their reputation gained in the past for investigative journalism and thanks to them we can have an insight of this phenomenon.

Sweating heavily and yelling at Chinese police officers, a group of Nigerians dragged the lifeless body of an injured compatriot up to a Guangzhou police station, blood dripping from a deep gash on his head.

Around them, a crowd of over one hundred Africans chanted, some holding sticks as others smashed potted plants and blocked traffic, demanding justice from the Chinese police after officers chased the man out of a high-rise window in a tightening security crackdown on illegal overstayers in the city this year.

“They don’t like black people to stay in China any more. They want us to go,” said Frank, one of the Nigerians at the protest on July 15 that was filmed by witnesses.

“They treat us like animals,” added Frank, an illegal overstayer, who wouldn’t give his name for fear of reprisals.

The spontaneous protest — a rare direct confrontation between foreigners and authorities in China — is a vivid reminder of the challenges faced by Beijing’s stability-obsessed Communist Party as it engages with the world and builds up trade links abroad.

In the past few years, tens of thousands of African and Arab traders have thronged to export hubs like Guangzhou and Yiwu in eastern China to seek their fortunes — sourcing cheap China-made goods back home to massive markups in a growing, lucrative trade.

But just as mass Chinese immigration abroad has fanned recent social tensions in Africa and other places, the influx of large numbers of foreigners, particularly Africans, into China is altering the social fabric of cities like Guangzhou and proving a headache to authorities.

While this rising tide of foreigners has brought vast economic gains, the edgy cosmopolitanism of melding cultures and liberal ideals has been laced with racial and social tensions, along with the problem of illegal overstayers resorting to crime.

“While most black people are engaged in valuable trading activities, others are staying illegally, working without valid permits or smuggling,” said Peng Peng, the research director of the Guangzhou Academy of Social Sciences, a provincial thinktank.

“How to manage this is becoming a very big problem.”

and the article continues:

While Africans have moved to other cosmopolitan Chinese cities like Shanghai, Hong Kong and Beijing, those in Guangzhou are most conspicuous — filling the streets in a district known as “Little Africa” replete with ethnic shops, eateries, and export malls crammed with all manner of goods including fake designer jeans, wigs, bright African textiles and VCD players.

But the influx has also caused unease among local Chinese.

Some neighbourhood committees bar Africans from living in residential complexes, while Internet forums such as Tianya buzz with heated, at times xenophobic, discussions of “black person” issues in the city.

“A lot of Chinese don’t like Africans, but there’s nothing we can do. They’re flooding into Guangzhou,” wrote one blogger on Tianya. Others blamed the immigrants for problems from drug peddling and petty theft, to the spread of HIV among prostitutes.

On the streets, while explicit racism is rare among conservative Chinese urbanites, fights do sometimes break out between Africans and Chinese over business disputes.

“Racial stereotypes on both sides do exist … it’s indicative of starkly different cultures,” said Martyn Davies, a China expert at South Africa’s Stellenbosch University.

“The challenge of the whole China-Africa relationship is going to be cultural acceptance … It’s not about capital or management skill or whatever, it’s about culture and essentially to break down stereotypes they have of one another.”

One concern is the difficulty to get visa extension so Africans, rather than leaving China, prefer to remain there illegally.

The lesson that the ruling liberal elite fail to grasp is that forcing an ethnically homogeneous population to accept immigrants from different ethnic groups can only create tensions as people want to live in places that are not enriched. After all it is what rich, white-hating liberals do.

Think about Jon Cruddas or Margaret Hodge; they allowed Barking & Dagenham to be swamped against the will of local residents but they stay away from there. This is true for the UK as well as China.

Chinese don’t see any value in diversity, and rightly they don’t want to be a minority in their own country and to become second class citizens. Of course many can argue that this is too far fetched as Chinese population is about 1.4bn. Unfortunately not, Britons were saying the same things 40 years ago when the first Afro-Caribbeans disembarked in the UK. No one then could believe that Britain would become the multiracial hell-hole it’s now.

Hopefully Chinese government won’t allow this and the BNP will soon get powerful enough to push for a change.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in ImmigrationComments (3)

Sixth of UK potato production under threat from the EU

Sixth of UK potato production under threat from the EU

Nothing damages the British economy more than EU regulations.

Rules drafted by unaccountable, unelected bureaucrats in Brussels are responsible for the loss of the manufacturing sector, the disappearance of the fishery industry and the destruction of farming.

At a time when rising food prices demand  more productive agriculture, the opposite is happening. The latest blow came from an EU directive that, if implemented, may reduce the production of potatos by a sixth.

According to The Scotsman:

UP TO a sixth of the UK’s potato production could be lost as a result of an EU directive on pesticides, an expert said yesterday.

Rob Clayton, of the Potato Council, based his warning on the effects of removing several chemicals essential in keeping pests and diseases, such as blight, slugs and eelworm at bay.

Speaking at the main potato research event outside Dundee, he said the loss of a single major pesticide used in the control of eelworm could cost the industry more than £50 million a year in reduced production.

A similar scale of loss was estimated if slugs were not controlled. And withdrawing one chemical used to fight potato blight could reduce the UK crop by 10 per cent on its own.

Despite its reduced budget, the Potato Council is co-ordinating research not only around the UK but also in other potato growing countries. Fiona Fell, chair of the knowledge transfer committee, said: “We are being much smarter in using the money we have for research.”

One of the biggest problems for growers of the humble spud is the damage that blight can cause. Over the past 200 years, many a crop has been left devastated by this bacterial disease and only in the past 50 years has the grower had a chemical means of controlling it.

“We are really under pressure with blight now,” she said. “We have a new strain coming in that attacks crops two weeks earlier than normal and we have a real battle with late blight attacking the crop just before it ripens.

“That means we have at least two additional sprays to add to a normal control programme.”

Perhaps there is a good reason to ban this pesticide, but the problem is that those who drafted this rule are people who live outside the UK and maybe they don’t have the slightest knowledge of agriculture.

This is another result of the sell out of British sovereignty carried out by the previous Labour and Conservative governments, acts of treason for which ordinary people are paying an heavy price.

It’s not clear if this decision is daft or made deliberately to suit the interests of powerful business groups, what is clear is that the poorest will be at higher risk of starving, as they may not be able to afford to pay more for potatos.

But don’t expect marxists like Harriet Harman, Ed Milliband, Margaret Hodge or Jon Cruddas to do something about that, they have only contempt for the people they claim to represent.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in EconomyComments (0)

Barking and Dagenham Labour Party in Chaos

Barking and Dagenham Labour Party in Chaos

Barking and Dagenham Post Councillors Cllrs Spring Cleaning

The above insipid article by the Labour biased Barking and Dagenham Post seeks to down play the chaos in the local Labour party. The recent revolt and chaos stems from the interference of Margaret Hodge MP for Barking and her sock puppets Domonic Twomey and Darren Rodwell who seem to have more power than the local Council Leader Liam Smith. Twomey who is not even a local councillor but the son of one is well known for his roughshod bullying style. Twomey and Hodge have joined forces to get rid of any councillors they regard as ‘trouble’. This includes some councillors who have been outspoken of the ‘loony left direction’ the party is taking. Others are objectors to the ‘Africans for Essex’ programme and the swamping of Barking and Dagenham with Africans. Disgruntled councillors have made their feelings clear in the comments section of this ARTICLE in Tribune.

Some councillors have decided not to go quietly and have gone independent causing further upheavals. Others have been more vocal about the way they have been treated. Cllr Val Rush was censured by the Labour group for a foul mouth tirade after she was given the news about her deselection. The BNP believe Cllr Rush has every right to be outraged about her treatment.  Others have decided to post their views on the chaos and infighting on blogs.  One such blog can be found HERE

The problem is the local labour party is run by bullies and fear and intimadation is what governs. Pretty much how Hitler and Stalin made their people do there bidding but in the end this is not sustainable. Bullies never win and cowards are shown up to be what they are. The local BNP are benefiting from this situation and are in talks with a number of sympathetic Labour Councillors who have expressed a wish to stand at the next local elections.

Posted in PoliticsComments (2)


BNP.org.uk