Betrayal, treachery and lies are the foundation stones of Mohammedism. This disgusting act of betrayal is a requirement iterated in the Suras of the dead paedo.

The Daily Mail
Please notice that the word ‘RENEGADE’ is used, this is a euphemism for a fanatical Muslim. The MSM and MoD will tell you that this act of betrayal should be taken in isolation, why do they say this?
Because when an uncomfortable situation such as this arises, the eye should be drawn away from the obvious, just as an illusionist will use smoke and mirrors, so the MSM and its controllers use a diverting tactic to turn attention from the real answer.

The real answer being that no matter how much respect and trust you give a Muslim, you cannot trust them an inch, they always want more and in the end we will be the ones asking for respect which will never be forthcoming from the Mohammedans. All religions other than the ‘cult’ of Mohammedism are looked on as false, and a denial of the dead paedo.

‘Taqqiya’(*) and ‘Kitman’(**) are two words that you out there should learn, for these words are vitally important to understand, and when you know what these words mean you will see why our idiot leaders, the bleeding heart brigade and you have been fooled and are still being fooled.

A renegade Afghan soldier is on the run today after killing three British soldiers in southern Helmand while they slept.
Another four British soldiers were wounded in the attack inside a joint patrol base near Nahr-e Saraj early this morning.
One of the three who died was killed in his bed as he slept at around 2am. The other two were apparently on guard duty at a tower overlooking the base when were hit when the attacker fired a rocket-propelled grenade.
He managed to escape and is now being hunted. The British soldiers are believed to be from the Gurkha regiment and their families are currently being informed.
Two are described as UK nationals and the third is believed to be Nepalese.
David Cameron described the deaths as ‘appalling’ and ‘dreadful’ but insisted the strategy in Afghanistan was right and would not change.
‘Our hearts go out to the brave Gurka soldiers and their families. It is an appalling incident. It needs an immediate and urgent investigation. I have discussed that with President Karzai this morning,’ he said.
‘It is absolutely essential that we do not let this incident change our attitude and approach. It is the right thing to do to build up the Afghan army. They are doing a good job. That is in the end the way we will be able to bring our troops home.’
He added: ‘The trust between the Afghan National Army and the British army is very strong and working well. This is a rogue element of the Afghan army, it is not typical of what the army is doing.’
Defence Secretary Liam Fox said it was ‘despicable and cowardly’ but also insisted British troops would carry on working with Afghans undeterred.

This is the third act of treachery on British soldiers since 2005, the Americans have had their lessons, one being Fort Hood (another RENEGADE?) which they have not learnt from.
You have to understand that no Muslim can be trusted in anything they say either stated, (‘Taqqiya’) or unsaid (‘Kitman’), nothing they say can be accepted as the truth.

*) Taqqiya: Dissimulation as sanctified hypocrisy. It is considered a part of Islamic strategy to lie and deceive unbelievers by any means. Thus exercising of taqqiyah is very pious behavior. Veiling the truth: Adjustment, deception up to the open lie. -Taqqiya is attached, if it is helpful to the well-being of the religion -Islam (Khomeini). Sunnis will deceptively say that is only a Shiites doctrine.

**) Kitman: Kitman is similar to Taqqiya but rather than outright dissimulation, it consists in telling only a part of the truth, with “mental reservation” justifying the omission of the rest. One example may suffice. When a Muslim maintains that “jihad” really means “a spiritual struggle” and fails to add that this definition is a recent one in Islam (little more than a century old), he misleads by holding back, and is practicing “kitman.” Another example would be the insistence of a Muslim apologist that, “of course”, there is freedom of conscience in Islam and then quoting that Qur’anic verse -“There shall be no compulsion in religion.” But the impression given will be false, for there has been no mention of the Muslim doctrine of abrogation, or naskh.

Share

South Wales BNP
The Green Arrow

I do not apologise for lifting this complete from GA. It says more than the MSM does about the dire state we find ourselves in today. And by the way, dont think that these people are a minority amongst Muslims, they are just the empty drum that makes the most noise. The Islamic cult is hell bent on removing all us Kuffars from the face of the earth. Google ‘Kitman’ and ‘Taqyyia’ what you find will open your eyes to the truth.

I urge you to watch the video in high definition and please, please, please listen carefully to the words spoken by the colonisers from the Cult of the Dead Paedophile.

The police stood by and allowed these people to spout their hatred towards the British People and non moslems.

I can now tell you that in a conversation with a senior police officer who was present, that the police were there, not to arrest the moslems but to defend them against (his own words) “right wing extremists who might turn up”. I guess that would be our Camera Crew.

Roger Phillips will also be heard telling you of what happened when he made an official complaint to the Police and the Police response. This will not be forgotten or dropped by BNP Wales.

Credit now to Roger, Anthony and those others who were also present and who must remain anonymous.

Thanks also to all who helped fund this operation. Still think your money was wasted Dowlish? Contact me.

Share

Probably few nationalists are aware that on the 13th of June Belgium held a general election.

No fault of theirs given that the MSM has paid little or no attention to this election, although the results could send shockwaves across the EU.

In fact a separatist party advocating independence for the Dutch-speaking region of Belgium, leaving the country’s Francophones to fend for themselves, scored an unprecedented win in Sunday’s general election.

Final results gave the Dutch-speaking New Flemish Alliance – a fringe factor until now – 27 of the 150 legislative seats, up 19 from the 2007 vote.

The election outcome was seen as a clear warning to Francophones to negotiate seriously about granting Dutch- and French-speakers more self-rule, or Dutch-speakers will bolt.

The New Flemish Alliance drew votes away from Premier Yves Leterme’s outgoing coalition of Christian Democrats, Liberals and Socialists – all split into Dutch- and French-speaking factions – whose three years in office were marked by enduring linguistic spats that remained unresolved.

The Alliance’s success marked the first time a Flemish nationalist movement overtook the traditional parties.

Belgium comprises Dutch-speaking Flanders in the north and French-speaking Wallonia in the south. Brussels, the officially bilingual but largely Francophone capital, is a third region.

Just about everything in Belgium – from political parties to broadcasters to boy scouts and voting ballots – comes in Dutch- and French-speaking versions.

Even charities such as the Red Cross and Amnesty International have separate chapters.

Bart De Wever, 39, leader of the New Flemish Alliance, urged “Francophones to make (a country) that works.”

In the election campaign, he accused economically backward Wallonia of bad governance, immunity to reforms and opposition to the Flemish desire for more self-rule.

But if De Wever becomes premier of this country of 6.5 million Dutch- and 4 million French-speakers, he will head a coalition government that will inevitably force him to tone down his independence talk and negotiate for more regional self rule within Belgium.

True to tradition, the big winners in Wallonia were the Socialists who won 26 seats, up six. Their leader, Elio di Rupo, also a would-be premier, said: “Many Flemish people want the country’s institutions reformed. We need to listen to that.”

King Albert is expected to begin talks with key politicians on what sort of government can be formed. In 2007, the government lasted only six months.

Constitutional reform has gone far. Flanders and Wallonia already have autonomy in urban development, environment, agriculture, employment, energy, culture, sports and other areas.

But Flemish parties want to add justice, health and social security to that. Wallonia fears making social security a federal responsibility marks the end of Belgium as a unitary state.

The divide goes beyond language.

Flanders tends to be conservative and free-trade minded. Wallonia’s long-dominant Socialists have a record of corruption. Flanders has half the unemployment of Wallonia and a 25 percent higher per-capita income, and its politicians are tired of subsidizing their Francophone neighbors.

As governments worldwide tried to tame a financial crisis and recession, the four parties that led Belgium since 2007 struggled with linguistic spats, most notably over a bilingual voting district comprising the capital, Brussels, and 35 Flemish towns bordering it.

The high court ruled it illegal in 2003 as only Dutch is the official language in Flanders. Over the years, Francophones from Brussels have moved in large numbers to the city’s leafy Flemish suburbs, where they are accused of refusing to learn Dutch and integrate.

Unsurprisingly many political commentators see in those results the begin of the end of Belgium as a nation.

This is not completely true because Belgium,strictly speaking, has never been a nation.

It’s an artificial kingdom created in 1830 as a buffer between France and Holland but inhabited by two different nations.

The Flemish and the Walloons speak not only a different language but have also different cultures, traditions and history and one of the reasons Belgium granted autonomy to those communities was to avoid tensions between them.

At that time the Belgian political elite may have assumed that people would gradually lose their identity until they felt Belgian rather than Flemish or Walloons.

Sound familiar?

Yes, this is the same attitude of the EU elite who plan to destroy every single nation in the EU in order to create a European superstate, but as Belgium demonstrates quite clearly a political union made of different nations that is undemocratic by nature and has no democratic legitimacy is bound to fail.

Belgium has existed for 170 years and people still tend to vote and organize themselves along ethnic lines so how anyone can believe that people in Europe would give up their identity and choose to become part of an European superstate they never wanted in the first place?

Nationalists know this, and they also know that up till now the European project could go ahead only because our elected politicians kept telling lies and using bully-boy tactics against anyone daring to oppose them.

This explains why have we never been given a referendum on the EU treaty?

This may also explain why those elections received little or no coverage, because by showing the results people would conclude that the British National Party has always been right about Britain and the EU.

Flemish taxpayers have had enough of being milked dry by the Belgian taxmen only to see they hard earned money being wasted and pocketed by Walloon politicians and this is why they want to break away from Belgium.

For the same reason many BNP supporters want Britain out of the EU because they don’t want their money pocketed by corrupt EU officials.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As the MSM are still attacking the BNP, nationalists will be delighted to hear that circulation of anti-BNP newspapers declined again in May.

The Daily Star ended a long run of year-on-year circulation rises in May, dropping 2.1 per cent to 822,934.

It meant that no UK-wide national newspaper put on sales year on year in May.

The Daily Mirror dropped 6.6 per cent year on year to 1,238,145, The Sunday Mirror dropped 5.9 per cent to 1,148,107 and The People dropped 9.7 per cent to 526,438.

Trinity Mirror announced yesterday that it was to cut around 200 jobs, or up to 40 per cent of the total editorial workforce, at its three national newspaper titles.

Elsewhere in the popular and mid markets, The Sun was the best performer – dropping by just 1.6 per cent to an average sale of 2,936,099. The paper continues to sell for 20p in many parts of the country.

The News of the World, which in May had a massive exclusive about Sarah Ferguson, dropped just 2.2 per cent to 2,858,727.

Full national newspaper ABC figure for May 2010: Source ABC

(Average daily sale for May followed by percentage change year on year

National Morning Popular

Daily Mirror 1,238,145 -6.57

Daily Record 328,618 -6.26

Daily Star 822,934 -2.11

The Sun 2,936,099 -1.61

Total of average daily net circulation 5,325,796 -3.18

National Morning Mid Market

Daily Express 663,627 -7.79

Daily Mail 2,090,469 -4.83

Total of average daily net circulation 2,754,096 -5.56

National Morning Quality

The Daily Telegraph 698,456 -16.49

Financial Times 399,862 -2.69

The Herald 54,943 -6.20

The Guardian 300,472 -10.47

The Independent 194,501 -4.85

The Scotsman 45,352 -5.84

The Times 515,379 -12.82

Total of average daily net circulation 2,208,965 -11.12

National Morning Sporting

Racing Post 56,818 -10.85

National Morning Group

National Sunday Popular

Daily Star Sunday 357,130 -0.72

News of the World 2,858,727 -2.24

Sunday Mail 389,218 -8.76

Sunday Mirror 1,148,107 -5.92

The People 526,438 -9.74

Total of average Sunday net circulation 5,279,620 -4.25

National Sunday Mid Market

Sunday Express 568,247 -10.66

Sunday Post 328,129 -8.26

The Mail on Sunday 1,918,512 -7.11

Total of average Sunday net circulation 2,814,888 -7.98

National Sunday Quality

Independent on Sunday 164,188 -1.95

The Observer 340,247 -16.10

Scotland on Sunday 57,057 -8.04

Sunday Herald 42,275 9.19

The Sunday Telegraph 512,819 -17.18

The Sunday Times 1,117,749 -6.42

Total of average Sunday net circulation 2,234,335 -10.17

The more newspapers keep lying, the greater the number of people that will vote with money from their own pockets and choose to stop buying them.

This trend is not going to be reversed until media tycoons stop paying lip service to their political puppet masters and the anti-British NUJ, unfortunately for them the people are waking, and can see that what is printed is not information but propaganda.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Even though the British National Party failed to win a seat in Parliament, we have never been so influential in the corridors of power in Westminster.

Ignored by the MSM a debate is going on in leftwing circles about the need for the Labour party to get tougher on immigration, and this is happening because we are still present and support for us is growing.

Now another Labour heavyweight has joined the list of labour members who want a change in direction.

Ed Balls, former Education Secretary and one of the contenders for leadership of the Labour party, in an article published in ‘The Observer’ admitted that the influx of eastern Europeans has had a negative impact on UK workers, and while he supports Turkeys membership of the EU he believes unskilled Turkish immigrants shouldn’t be allowed in the UK.

How much Mr Balls can be trusted is anyone’s guess, he and his party have a long record of spin and deceit.

Nonetheless his position marks a shift in the debate on immigration.

Before May 6th it would have been unthinkable to hear someone from the Labour party talking tough on immigration, after all, the previous Home Secretary Alan Johnson said he wouldn’t lose sleep over the number of people moving into Britain.

Regardless of our results, it is becoming clear that not only have we increased our votes slightly, but among the working class there now exists a group of hardcore BNP supporters which is not going to vote Labour again and their numbers are going to get bigger.

Mr Balls and others in the Labour party know very well this is happening, and realise that ignoring them is not an option because no smear campaign they can dream up is going to stop us so long as there are voters who are suffering.

Is it strange indeed that no one inside the Labour party is condemning Balls for pandering to the ‘far-right’, a sign that our anti-immigration policies are slowly becoming mainstream.

Therefore the ability of the BNP to influence political debate and force Labour to change their policies is what we really achieved on the 6th of May.

We didn’t get an MP elected but we are pushing our agenda to the three main parties, further evidence that we are now a powerful force in British politics.

On the plus side Mr Balls’ intervention has been condemned by many antifascist organizations, who accused him of behaving like a BNP member and nothing is more rewarding for a nationalist than an upset unwashed and useless piece of flotsam.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Since the somewhat disappointing results of 6th May, the MSM has been happily crowing that the British National Party is now gone for good.

It’s a lie of course, and nationalists will be pleased to know that under the radar the BNP is shaping political agenda in the three main parties.

A few days ago we reported that a debate is taking place in left-wing circles about the need for the Labour party to get tougher on immigration.

Also Margaret Hodge, in an article published on the Daily Telegraph, after throwing her usual bile on us, she admitted, the only effective way to stop the BNP is by introducing a better system for rationing housing and benefits, with priority for those who have lived in an area for longest.

Now what is interesting about her comment is that no one attacked Mrs Hodge for pandering to the fascist BNP, let’s not forget she was rapped a few years ago when she suggested the council houses should be given only to people who lived in a borough for a very long time.

Clearly the Labour party are well aware that many voters agree with us on those issues, and they cannot ignore them because they know full well the BNP is still around and could get more votes in the future from those disillusioned voters.

A similar thing is happening in the Conservative party.

Broxbourne Tory MP Charles Walker has recently warned that uncontrolled immigration could lead to a rise in support for the far right. (not that the BNP is “far” right)

Speaking in the House of Commons Mr Walker said that while his constituents were “fair-minded, decent and compassionate people” he added “uncontrolled immigration is not an unalloyed good for everyone”.

He said: “Broxbourne constituent want skilled workers coming to this country who can add to the wealth of this country and pay taxes that help to support hospitals, schools and infrastructure. My constituents also want to provide genuine sanctuary to those who are in genuine fear for their lives. However, we have to recognise in this place that uncontrolled immigration is not an unalloyed good for everyone.”

He added: “Immigration tends to work very well for the middle and upper classes, but many of my constituents are competing for scarce public resources, such as education, health, transport and housing. That has created a level of concern and bad feeling which has caused me a great deal of concern, because in my constituency and others we still see the British National Party getting a foothold and gaining traction.”

He went on to congratulate Labour MPs Jon Cruddas and Margaret Hodge who “had such fantastic results against the British National party, not only turning back Nick Griffin, the leader of that party, but ensuring that night that many BNP councillors lost their seats”.

Mr Walker called for progress against the far right to continue, but said: “If we are to do so, our constituents need to know that we are serious about addressing their concerns.”

To put everything in perspective in Broxbourne the BNP candidate Steve McCole got 4.73% against the 58.79% obtained by Mr Walker.

No one would make a fuss about those figures, this is after all a safe Tory seat and our presence would have been unnoticed.

Instead we see an MP with a comfortable majority panicking about a party that got less that 5% and admitting (albeit indirectly) that state-sponsored harassment and smears will not stop us.

The fact that Mr Walker is scared of us says a lot about our power and the way we are influencing the political debate, thus dismissing the claim made by MSM that the BNP has been defeated for good.

As for addressing voters concerns, a good start would be to state, clearly, that the Conservatives are not only opposed to an amnesty for illegal immigrants, but also that they will kick them out of the country.

Don’t hold your breath, after all one of the most ardent supporter of that amnesty is Boris Johnson and no one from the Conservative party told him to shut up.

Soon voters will realize that Tories are now a carbon copy of the Labour party and more of them will support us.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

If you believe the MSM you may well think that the British National Party is gone for good.

Well this is not the case, and it may explain why Margaret Hodge, almost a month after she said it is time for BNP members in Barking & Dagenham to pack up and leave. In the Daily Telegraph she feels the need to write an article explaining why the only way to defeat the BNP is through open debate.
[1]http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/bnp/7776363/How-to-beat-the-BNP-and-make-sure-they-dont-come-back.html

Nationalists may find her intervention upsetting but the fact that she was forced to write such an article in the first place shows that the BNP are now a political force powerful enough to make the three other parties confront issues like immigration that they have neglected for too long.

Indeed a debate is going on in left-wing circles about the need for Labour to be tougher on immigration.

David Goodhart, editor of Prospect magazine, argues that Labour must become an anti-immigration party and it uses good arguments that should resonate with anyone claiming to represent the interests of the working class.
[2] http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2010/05/18/labour-must-become-the-anti-immigration-party-david-goodhart/

However the split in the ranks of NuLabour are apparent when we read this from Daniel Trilling in the New Statesman disagreeing from his cloud cuckoo land with Mr Goodhart.

According to Mr Trilling Barking has experienced a relatively low level of immigration compared to the rest of London. And nationally, support for the BNP is strongest in areas with low, rather than high numbers of immigrants. (of course it is strongest in less enriched areas, immigrants won’t vote for the goose that lays the eggs will they you idiot.)
[3] http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/05/immigration-labour-bnp

This position is echoed by Anders Lustgarten, the author of the play “A day at the racists”

According to Mr Lustgarten the cheap labour of some of those people, immigrants, was a key element of New Labour’s “economic miracle”, yet the state never acknowledged the role they played — so when times went bad, nobody remembered what they had done to make them good. Instead, Miliband, Balls, Burnham et al seem intent on scapegoating immigrants to distract us from the real causes of hardship.
[4] http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/05/touch-labour-immigration-shows

Clearly he doesn’t know what the word hardship means but nationalists can take comfort from the fact that those left-wing intellectuals, with all their nonsense words, and detachment from the real world, can only help the cause of nationalism because ordinary people that have suffered 13 years of Labour misrule will surely feel insulted and offended by their claim that immigration is good for them.

Of course Labour will never be tough on immigration or the cause of immigration and will never listen to people, but the fact that such a debate is taking place means that the BNP is becoming more powerful by the day and many in the Labour party are feeling the pressure we are putting on them.

ps: Compare the comments in the Telegraph article and the ones in The New Statesman, even the lefties are worried about mass immigration. We are not going away you Fabianites, you will be exposed for what you are. Traitors!!

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As the MSM are more than ever committed to their smear campaign against the British National Party, nationalists will be delighted to hear that only two national newspapers record a year-on-year slight increase in their circulations last month, according to figures released today by the Audit Bureau of Circulations.

The Independent on Sunday recorded a year-on-year rise in circulation of 1.88 per cent to a weekly average of 168,151 in April, while the Daily Star saw its circulation rise by an almost negligible 0.05 per cent to a daily average of 823,025.

In stark contrast, The Observer, The Sunday Telegraph, The Guardian, The Times and The Daily Telegraph all recorded double digit declines in circulation year-on-year.

National newspaper circulation figures for April 2010 (source ABC)

Figures given are per issue sale for the month and percentage change year on year

Daily Mirror 1,239,691 -6.13

Daily Record 331,012 -7.08

Daily Star 823,025 0.05

The Sun 2,955,957 -0.06

Daily Express 665,731 -8.26

Daily Mail 2,096,074 -3.86

The Daily Telegraph 683,220 -11.81

Financial Times 386,590 -8.19

The Guardian 288,917 -15.83

The Independent 188,119 -7.98

The Times 506,997 -14.18

Daily Star Sunday 348,188 -2.64

News of the World 2,905,780 -1.04

Sunday Mirror 1,124,080 -7.63

The People 530,117 -8.31

Sunday Express 574,323 -9.90

The Mail on Sunday 1,983,283 -4.40

Independent on Sunday 168,151 1.88

The Observer 331,791 -21.30

The Sunday Telegraph 510,146 -10.84

The Sunday Times 1,135,077 -7.09

It’s interesting to see that the newspapers with the sharpest decline are the ones that printed more lies about the BNP.

It’s worth remembering that the Daily Telegraph and Sunday Telegraph used to say BNP members are a bunch of idiots whereas the Times and Sunday Times printed stories based on lies to stop people supporting us.

Clearly nationalists have voted with their pockets and decided to boycott them, and apparently this strategy is working because their decline in circulation is putting pressure on their balance sheets and some are planning job cuts in order to reduce their losses.

This trend is unlikely to be reversed until media tycoons understand that by pandering to the NUJ they are digging their own grave as people have had enough of their lies and propaganda.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As the MSM starts another smear campaign against the British National Party nationalists will be very happy to hear that in March the circulation of newspapers, apart few exceptions, fell again.

Circulation of The Observer fell by more than 23 per cent year-on-year in its first full month after relaunching.

The Observer had an average circulation of 331,488 each week in March, a drop of 23.9 per cent from the same month the previous year and its lowest figure since August 1962, as all but one quality Sunday paper suffered double-digit falls.

Circulation of The Observer, which is the oldest Sunday newspaper in the world, fell by just under 100,000 copies from the 431,017 it circulated in March last year, however, in the intervening period it has ceased the sale of bulks – copies readers can pick up free from hotels, airlines and gyms – of which it distributed 22,737 in March, 2009.

The Observer, which relaunched in a slimmed down version on 21 February, has also been scaling down its overseas sale. It was cut from 36,645 in March last year to 19,018 last month – a reduction of 17,627.

Overall the joint circulation of all quality Sunday papers dropped 12.40 per cent year-on-year last month with only the Independent on Sunday avoiding a double-digit drop. Its circulation fell by 8.03 per cent year-on-year to a weekly average of 154,285.

The Sunday Times recorded a circulation drop of 10.38 per cent year-on-year to an average weekly circulation of 1,111,660 last month – it remained the biggest selling quality Sunday paper.

The fall in circulation of Sunday Times can, in part, be explained by it ending the sale of the few bulks it distributed and a reduction in its overseas sale from 50,696 in March, 2009, to 43,421 last month.

Last March the paper’s sales were also increased as it gave away an 11 track Noel Gallagher CD mid-month.

The Sunday Telegraph recorded a fall in circulation of 11.79 per cent year-on-year last month to a weekly average of 509,754.

Falls in the Sunday market were almost matched in the daily quality sector where all papers, bar the Financial Times, recorded a double-digit circulation decline.

The cut-price 20p Daily Star was the only national newspaper of any type to rise year on year – up 0.87 per cent to 827,005. The Sun, which is also on sale for 20p in much of the UK, put in a relatively strong performance down 2.04 per cent year on year to stay just above the three million mark.

With nearly all newspapers losing sales, the Mail titles were at least able to boast that they had increased their market share today.

Associated Newspapers said in a press release that the Daily Mail increased its market share by 0.5 per cent to 20.2 per cent while the Mail on Sunday grew 0.9 per cent to 18.8 per cent.

National newspaper sales figures for March, source ABC:

Daily Mirror 1,247,013 -6.95

Daily Record 333,359 -6.96

Daily Star 827,005 0.87

The Sun 3,005,308 -2.04

Daily Express 668,273 -7.93

Daily Mail 2,082,352 -3.00

The Daily Telegraph 686,679 -10.21

Financial Times 401,286 -6.41

The Herald 55,579 -6.66

The Guardian 283,063 -16.98

The Independent 184,137 -10.31

The Scotsman 45,518 -7.32

The Times 502,436 -16.29

Racing Post 68,332 -5.20

Daily Star Sunday 341,824 -5.59

News of the World 2,904,566 -3.71

Sunday Mail 399,000 -9.98

Sunday Mirror 1,147,272 -6.64

The People 532,140 -8.38

Sunday Express 570,040 -10.39

Sunday Post 337,052 -6.73

The Mail on Sunday 1,952,697 -2.22

Independent on Sunday 154,285 -8.03

The Observer 331,488 -23.09

Scotland on Sunday 58,554 -7.30

Sunday Herald 42,933 4.60

The Sunday Telegraph 509,754 -11.79

The Sunday Times 1,111,660 -10.38

We have said it before, and we will say it again. The editors of those papers are paying the price of their own arrogance and contempt for their readers.

More and more people are realizing that newspapers are the mouthpiece of the treacherous and corrupt liberal elite that is destroying this country, but thanks to the internet the people have an unbiased source of information.

Let’s hope that one or more of them go bankrupt sooner rather than later.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The MSM are preparing to launch a massive smear campaign against the British National Party.                                                 Nationalists will be delighted to know that every quality Sunday and Daily national newspaper (with the exception of the Daily Star and the Daily Star on Sunday) recorded a year-on-year drop in circulation in November – and The Guardian, The Observer, The Financial Times and The Times suffering sharp dips.

According to the latest figures from the Audit Bureau of Circulations, published today, the Financial Times had an average global circulation of 401,072 in November, a fall of 9.2 per cent on the same month last year.

The UK and Irish edition of the FT had an average circulation of 119,868 last month, down 16.34 per cent from the 143,269 it sold last November.

News International daily, The Times, had an average circulation of 563,262 last month – down 9.42 per cent on November last year.

Telegraph Media Group’s Daily Telegraph had an average circulation of 744,151 last month, a drop of 5.65 per cent year-on-year, while Independent News & Media’s Independent dropped to an average circulation of 186,557, a fall of 7.24 per cent year-on-year.

Guardian News & Media’s daily, The Guardian, recorded an average daily circulation of 305,240 in November, a drop of 14.83 per cent year-on-year.

The Guardian’s stablemate, The Observer, recorded a similarly large circulation fall. GN&M’s Sunday paper had a circulation of 372,669 last month, a year-on-year drop of 16.06 per cent in the month that executives at the publishing company announced a further 100 job losses and outlined plans for cuts at GN&M resulting in a slimmed-down version of the paper in the New Year.

A large part of the double-digit circulation fall of The Guardian and The Observer can be attributed to GN&M’s decision in August to cease distribution of bulks – copies readers can pick up free from hotels, airlines and gyms.

Month-on-month The Guardian’ circulation fell 2.13 per cent from the 311,878 it averaged in October. Month-on-month the circulation of The Observer rose 1.57 per cent.

Behind The Observer, the second biggest faller in the Sunday market was News & Media’s Independent on Sunday. It had an average weekly circulation of 156,517 in November, a drop of 5.75 per cent year-on-year.

The Sunday Telegraph averaged a weekly circulation of 577,201 in November, a drop of four per cent year-on-year, while News International’s Sunday Times sold an average of 1,171,457 each week last month, a year-on-year drop of 4.26 per cent.

Alarm bells must be ringing at Trinity Mirror Group following the release of the ABC figures for November.

The Daily Mirror dropped 10 per cent year on year to 1,260,019 as it felt the effects of being 25p more expensive than the 20p Daily Star, and Sun which is also on sale for 20p in much of the country.

The Star rose 15.3 per cent year on year to 823,476 and The Sun dropped 2.87 per cent to 2.958,502.

TMG’s nationals division made an operating profit of £38.2m in 2008/2009 – so Trinity Mirror may now be looking at siphoning some of that cash into the Daily Mirror’s marketing budget to stem the sales losses at a paper.

Daily Mail and General Trust said in a rider to the annual results last month that the Mail titles were ditching CD and DVD give-aways in favour of “a sustained direct marketing campaign to recruit more long term loyal purchasers”.

If November’s figures are anything to do by, it seemed to be doing the trick.

The Daily Mail was the top performing mid-market title, other than the Daily Star,dropping just 0.7 per cent year on year to 2,163,701.The Mail on Sunday also performed well in its market, dropping 4.16 per cent to 2,071,526.

Like The Sun, the News of the World also dropped below three million in November, falling 7.3 per cent to 2,932,366.

National newspaper circulations for November 2009 (source ABC)

Popular/mid-market dailies:

Daily Mirror: 1,260,019, -10.01

Daily Record:323,051, -10.72

Daily Star: 823,476, 15.30

The Daily Telegraph: 744,151,-5.65

Financial Times: 401,072, -9.20

The Herald: 56,746, -9.57

The Guardian: 305,240, -14.83

The Independent: 186,557, -7.24

The Scotsman: 46,300, -7.78

The Times: 563,262, -9.42

The Sun: 2,958,502, -2.87

Racing Post: 57,456, -6.85

Daily Express: 685,195, -8.91

Daily Mail: 2,148,571, -0.70

Popular/mid-market Sundays

Independent on Sunday: 156,517, -5.75

The Observer: 372,669, -16.06

Scotland on Sunday: 58,595, -6.10

Sunday Herald: 43,173, -0.79

The Sunday Telegraph: 577,201, -4.00

The Sunday Times: 1,171,457, -4.26

Daily Star Sunday: 354,386, 2.15

News of the World: 2,923,355, -7.30

Sunday Mail: 392,174, -13.24

Sunday Mirror: 1,148,244, -8.52

The People: 533,782, -10.41

Sunday Express: 594,517, -11.33

Sunday Post: 340,285, -10.13

The Mail on Sunday: 2,071,526, -4.16

Clearly the MSM are paying the price for their anti-British hatred and biased editorial content.

Thanks to the internet, more and more people are refusing to accept the distorted version of the facts offered to them by newspapers and look elsewhere for information, including, but not exclusively the BNP’ website, other nationalist sites are out there. have a look at the right hand side of our front page.

Let’s hope that those rags go bankrupt one by one, and sooner rather than later.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

An interesting and thought provoking article from ‘politicalmizz’

More Lies From The Politically Controlled MSM.

Our politically controlled MSM have launched yet another attack on a perfectly lawful, political party, the BNP. The Daily Star has claimed the BNP approached a “martial arts expert to train its members in deadly close combat fighting”, the thought of the BNP old women carrying out these kind of manoeuvres after one too many at the annual Christmas do, did made me smile.

This far-fetched story presented as fact by The Daily Star to its readers, has to be the very worst example of gutter journalism this country has seen, oh for at least a week, its like the MSM genuinely believes their readers will believe absolutely anything they say, no matter how ridiculous the stories are.

The dilemma the MSM is now finding itself in is this, because all the ridiculous stories they’ve churned out about the BNP before the euro elections, didn’t have that much effect eg we still managed to get two MEP’s elected, despite the combined effort of an aggressive, co-ordinated, establishment campaign directed at the BNP, they now have to up the ante, by printing more and more outrageous lies in order to out-do each other, and to try an convince their readers that the BNP is bad, because the last lies didn’t work.

The rise of the BNP is the establishments worst nightmare, because at all costs the truth must be withheld from the British people, make no mistake the establishment lives in constant fear of the BNP, because they know that we know the extent of their crimes against the British people, and there is many, and the BNP is the only political party that will bring them to account for these crimes.

Prepare for even more outrageous lies as the MSM have backed themselves into a lose/lose situation, it’s never a good move for newspapers to lie, or indeed any media outlet, because they only end up discrediting themselves and no-one else. The MSM are losing their readers, their pride will prevent them from admitting to themselves that they do not have the monopoly of information anymore, newspapers sales are down, they’re shedding staff because they just can’t compete in the new information age, they’re not as powerful as they once were, this can only be a good thing for democracy.

One important question remains and it has to be asked-if the BNP are as bad as the establishment would have us believe, why the lies?

©politicalMIZZ 15/09/2009
As Published

Share