Tag Archive | "nuj"

Ian O’Doherty: It’s not racist to say ‘sorry, we’re full’

Ian O’Doherty: It’s not racist to say ‘sorry, we’re full’

Ireland, like Britain, is run by a treacherous political elite committed to destroying Irish identity through mass immigration.

The only difference between us is that in Ireland there are still journalists with independent minds and open eyes and common sense, something rare as rocking horse manure in the UK.

Ian O’Doherty is one of them.

A piece he wrote in the Irish Independent. Mr O’Doherty attacks the pro-immigration lobby who believe they have the right to harass anyone who dares oppose immigration.

Mr O’Doherty is not a BNP supporter and because he is not his comments have more credibility as no one can accuse him of being a ‘nazi’.

I present the article in full, as nationalists have no chance of finding anything like this printed in a British newspaper, the NUJ would never allow it.

The current debacle in Mosney was rightly declared by the Free Legal Advice Centre to be “an accident waiting to happen”, but it also brings up some other, wider issues.

In fact, the whole debate about refugees/asylum seekers, or whatever you want to call them, is a boil that needs to be lanced.

Indeed, the debate has become completely poisoned by professional Left-wing advocates who immediately denounce anyone with a dissenting voice as a racist.

This reached the height of wicked stupidity when the Immigrant Council of Ireland actually went to the police and tried to have Kevin Myers prosecuted because he had written a piece about Africa that they didn’t like.

This is the country we now live in, where government-funded groups would have journalists arrested on the grounds that they said something that didn’t fit their ideology.

And because of this Stalinist urge to purge anyone who dares to deviate from the same hymn sheet, most people prefer to just keep their head down and say nothing rather than have a horde of screaming morons descend on them making the spurious accusation of racism.

But ask yourself this — those of us in our mid-to-late 30s were the last emigration generation and when we applied for visas to the States or Australia, we knew the rules of engagement.

Australia, in particular, was quite open about their entry requirements — if you possessed a skill they wanted or needed, you got in. If not, you didn’t.

It wasn’t racist; it was just one of those things.

Now, in Ireland, we need to stop beating around the bush and start uttering some harsh truths.

Regardless of the rights and wrongs of the Mosney situation, it’s time for Ireland to admit that, sorry, we’re full.

We simply cannot afford to accommodate any more people who, through free accommodation, free legal advice, food, clothing and so on, become a burden on the State from the moment they arrive on Irish soil.

That’s not racism, that’s simply a case of pragmatic self-interest.

And, before you start to bleat that we need to take account of the horrid lives and hideous countries these people invariably come from, you can answer back — do we really?

On a human level, obviously it is impossible not to feel compassion for some of the stories we hear on a daily basis from refugees and asylum seekers, but the reality is that no matter how heart-rending their stories may be, ultimately they are not our problem.

At what point did Ireland suddenly have a moral obligation to look after people who had probably never even heard of this country until they got here?

At what point did we have a moral obligation to provide care and comfort and take on the financial burden of people who have no identifiable skills, who can’t speak the language and who, alongside their children, will only ever take from a system they never contributed to in the first place?

Look, I can’t blame people for wanting to come here from there.

Having said that, the State has an obligation towards its own citizens first.

We have more of a right to access the country’s education, health and social welfare provisions than someone who only arrived here last week.

Is that racist? Is it now racist to point out that the vast amounts of money spent on the asylum process and the seekers themselves would have been better spent maintaining and preventing the HSE cuts to the already lamentable support given to respite carers?

Of course, the hundreds, if not thousands of people riding the asylum gravy train will immediately take their head out of the financial trough they’ve been gorging on for years and start to scream about racism/bigotry/whatever you’re having yourself.

But as the new Australian PM Julia Gillard pointed out this week, being concerned about the number of people who come to your country and are just a burden does not make you a racist.

She is to be congratulated on having the stones to say what the average Irish politician, or indeed person, would think but not say.

Left-wing advocates would have you believe that if you harbour any doubts at all about untrammelled immigration not being a good thing, then you belong in the British National Party.

And, ironically, because they have been so successful in stifling proper debate and slurring people they disagree with, this has left a vacuum which the likes of the BNP were quick to fill.

Here in Ireland, you only have to listen to some radio phone-in shows and read Irish blogs to see what true racism really is — ugly, spiteful, ignorant and full of an irrational hate.

Indeed, it happened to me a while back when a woman rang the office to say fair play for not being politically correct. When I said thanks, she then went to add: “You’re a good man, Iano, I f***ing hate niggers as well.”

It was a profoundly depressing moment; the realisation that because nobody wants to talk reasonably about this issue, as soon as someone does, the bigots think they have a mouthpiece.

I don’t answer my phone any more.

But what the likes of that moron who rang, or the hate-spewing rabble of the phone-in shows, prove is that ignorance, stupidity and contempt for common sense is not limited solely to the activists on the Left.

- Ian O’Doherty

Irish Independent

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in ImmigrationComments (2)

Journalists told to “Attack” the BNP by the NUJ.

Journalists told to “Attack” the BNP by the NUJ.

We Nationalists have known for years why the MSM attacks the BNP at every opportunity, because the National Union of Journalist (NUJ) imposes diktats on  all journalists to report only negative stories about us.

So no one will be surprised to hear that the NUJ has launched a website aimed at challenging the fascist politics of hate called, ‘Reporting the BNP’.

The website tells journalists to “scrutinise people from all parties” and states; “Our job is also to tell the truth, which is why we have provided this resource for journalists covering the BNP in the course of their work.” (Oooohhhh pick on us why don’t you, no fascists in NuLab or the UAF then eh!!!)

The website includes background information on the party, its past, policies and key figures and explains “why the BNP is not like any other party” (too true it is not like any other party,it is honest about what it stands for, unlike the “musicalchair” party).

Amidst the diatribes on the website is a piece by Daily Mirror journalist Tom Parry on his experience of reporting on the BNP’  for his paper’s “Hope not Hate” campaign.

He said: “The first difficulty of reporting on the BNP is obtaining a useable comment from the party’s spokesman and deputy chairman Simon Darby.

“In my experience, a conversation with Mr Darby is unlike any with a mainstream party’s head of communications or press office…In the first days of the “Hope not Hate” bus tour – when he was still prepared to answer my calls Darby would habitually turn the request for a statement on something one of the party’s prominent members had said into a personal attack.”

Launching the ‘Reporting the BNP’ website today, NUJ general secretary Jeremy Dear said: “Challenging the fascist politics of hate is a job for every fair-minded person in our society, not just a task for committed activists.

“NUJ members are proud to play our part in exposing the myths on which modern Nazis seek to gain power.

“Those journalists who may still believe that the rise of the BNP doesn’t affect them should consider the experience of Dominic Kennedy, investigations editor of The Times.

“He was brutally manhandled by BNP ‘security guards’ who expelled him from a press conference for the unspeakable crime of saying things their leaders didn’t like.

“Strange behaviour from an organisation which claims it wants to ‘remove legal curbs on freedom of speech’. BNP leader Nick Griffin even praised his stormtroopers by saying of their thuggery: ‘That’s not the actions of a snivelling PC party, but of an organisation that has had enough of being lied about.’

“That’s the true face of the BNP’s ‘freedom of expression’ policy’.”(No you pratt, the reason pinky/gingerDickheadDom was ejected was because he had been refused entry before the EGM, get the facts right you dhimmy, I was there)

Nationalists need to look at this website and see the extent to which the NUJ is a threat to free speech and democracy.

The good news for us, and the bad for the “Ginger/Pink Minger” is that the NUJ is in a parlous financial state.

We reported in the past that it will hold a conference every 18 months instead of every year and it needs to rent out part of its headquarters:

http://www.londonpatriot.org/2009/11/24/nuj-cuts-to-offset-projected-budget-deficit-of-600000/

It is also increasing membership subs by between 8p and 15p a week.

Lay delegates to the NUJ’s annual conference last November took the decision and the rise for NUJ members will come into force on 1st March.

General-Secretary Jeremy Dear, said: “Nobody likes an increase in subscriptions but this small increase is unavoidable if we are to keep the union financially healthy.

“We’ve worked hard to reduce running costs, and our staff volunteered to seek no pay rise as a much-appreciated contribution to the secure running of the NUJ, so that it can continue to help and support those fighting for jobs, defending their terms and conditions and advancing journalistic standards.”

It is the first time there has been an increase in NUJ subs for two years.

The NUJ has 37,700 members of which 28,600 are paying members.

The new subscription charges (anally) are as follows:

Grade one (local newspapers)- £150 to £154.16
Grade two (freelance) – £189 to £195.24
Grade (national newspapers and broadcasters) – £260 to £267.80

The NUJ need to be financially healthy to carry on interfering in our democratic process.

It’s upsetting for the NUJ, but it might convince people that MSM are untrustworthy and what they print is  politically (Common Purpose) led.

We can only hope that this plan to expose the BNP  increases speed of decline in the dead tree press’ and they bankrupt themselves.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in MiscComments (7)

Marxists are running the Media.

Marxists are running the Media.

As the smear campaign against the British National Party is up and running again, Nationalists see this as  proof that the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) demands that any NUJ Left reporter must give the BNP only negative coverage.

Now an insider confirms what everyone has suspected for a long time.

Mark Watts, one of the candidates in the election for editor of NUJ magazine ‘The Journalist’ has accused a “political faction” called NUJ Left of trying to hijack it.

Each of the candidates in the election to edit ‘The Journalist’ are allowed an email out to union members.

Watts has used his to launch a lengthy diatribe against NUJ Left and the candidate it has endorsed as ‘The Journalist’ editor, Richard Simcox (who is a member of the group).

NUJ Left says on its website its aims include: “Identifying and targeting key elected posts and NEC seats, democratically agreeing slates for elections, and campaigning for NUJ Left candidates, to advance our influence and further develop equality representation on policy-making bodies and through other structures of the union.”

Watts says in his email today: “The fact that the group is ‘left-wing’ is irrelevant: a cabal in the NUJ is poisonous regardless of its political hue, extreme or otherwise.

“This is clear evidence that ‘NUJ Left’ is attempting to hijack our union. It is an astonishingly brazen and jackass attempt. In my many years of investigative journalism, I have never known a group of plotters simply to plonk their game-plan onto a website.

“Let’s just say, this ‘NUJ Left’ crowd are not exactly clever. And yet, we’re on the verge of allowing this bunch to take over our union.”

Watts criticises Simcox for not mentioning the fact that he is a member of NUJ Left on his campaign website or in the profile he provided for publication on this website.

Watts quotes Channel 4 news anchor Jon Snow as one of his supporters in his email.

Snow says: “I left the NUJ over the absurd Israel boycott concocted by another union clique.

“I support the Watts campaign. It is time members voted for a truly independent journalists’ union.”

According to Watts, NUJ Left can muster 400 votes out of the union’s estimated 40,000 members, and he believes that could be enough to swing election to the £51,000 a year position if turnout is low

If Mr Watts is successful in his campaign, and brings any significant change to the NUJ remains to be seen.

The left has, as we have been aware for many years, infiltrated the NUJ to the extent that accurate reporting of news is a rarity. Journos become Editors, and is it a surprise that sales are falling?

Who would pay for a tabloid or broadsheet that tells one what to think, instead of allowing the buyer to make up their own mind?

‘The Evening Standard’ now has to rely on advertising to keep it going, once a formidable organ for the dissemination of information, it is now just a hack. As an aside to this, what are its advertising rates doing to the other daily papers, I bet the owners of the others are not too happy.

Why do newspapers keep alienating BNP supporters at a time when many of them are almost bankrupt because of falling circulation and slump in advertising.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in MiscComments (1)

Guardian Media Group makes £89.8m loss

Guardian Media Group makes £89.8m loss

As mainstream media started a smear campaign against the BNP, nationalists can take comfort in the fact that newspapers are in a dire financial situation.

Guardian Media Group (GMG), the holding company that controls The Guardian, The Observer, GMG Radio and many local papers overall reported a pre-tax loss of £89.8m compared with a profit last year of £306.4m. Interestingly, of that £89.8m loss, £24m was due to botched currency trading aimed to protect hedge-fund investments.

So it’s not surprising if  The Guardian is considering charging for some of its online content even if they are aware that many people, rather than start paying, will look for news elsewhere.

The GMG is desperate to cut costs and so it’s considering closing down The Observer, the oldest Sunday newspaper. Other options being considered are reducing its size or turning it into a mid-week supplement.

Its losses are not bigger than The Guardian’s but the Scott Trust, the charity that controls the GMG, is obliged to maintain The Guardian at any cost, even if this means closing down or downsizing other businesses in the group.
This explains why the brunt of those cost-cutting measures have been borne by local papers like the Manchester Evening News.

Of course a campaign was started to save The Observer, supported by many celebrities and by the Labour MP Denis MacShane who declared:

“As a former NUJ president and an occasional contributor to the Observer I don’t want it to disappear and another tranche of our best journalists scurrying to find work in PR or learning about Job Seekers Allowance.

“The Observer is part of the very fabric of our parliamentary democracy. No European country, nor the US, has a paper like it. I hope MPs of all shades of opinion do write and say the Observer should not die.”

Indeed Mr MacShane has a point.

No other country has a newspaper that prints stories based on lies to smear a perfectly legitimate party, or who condones and often supports physical attacks against BNP activists and distorts stories to promote its multicultural agenda.

To be fair The Observer is not alone but given that the press in this country has now become a tool used by the political elite to stop anyone who dare to challenge its plans, its closure is not a bad news at all.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Posted in EconomyComments (2)


BNP.org.uk