Well, the first televised debate by the three party leaders is done and dusted: now all the hoopla and self-congratulation dies down what exactly did this tell us about Cameron, Brown and Clegg: and more critically, their “Policies”

In my book it’s simple! Despite wordy manifestos and skads of hot air plus naturally, soupçon of self-justification from Cameron and more particularly Brown, none of them actually have any real policies!

The debate, if one could possibly by any stretch of a fevered imagination dignify the anodyne proceedings with such a title, kicked off, sort of, with a discussion about the thorny topic they all danced around and avoided as best they might: immigration.

Not one dared to face facts: neither Cameron nor Clegg had the brass ones to bring up Andrew Neather’s whistle blowing revelation about Zanulab’s heinous, and covert social engineering policy; allowing unfettered immigration to try and actualise their Ivory Tower dream of a multicultural society, whatever that really is.

Now personally, I would have placed Brown right on the spot, right then.

Furthermore, Brown then had the sheer temerity and brass neck to state that employers of illegal migrants would face the full force of criminal law: nice idea.

So what about Baroness Scotland, who employed an illegal migrant as her cleaner?

Is she going to be banged up? I wish!

Now the next aspect was they all stated they wanted continuing immigration: huh? Why? Skills shortages was the next convenient soundbite: what bloody skills shortages?

OK: I’ll accept the odd comms satellite designer and engineer, since this is one area in which Britain could earn huge export profits from: could, you understand; note the caveat!

Personally, I think we already have sufficient Kebab houses and curry palaces.

In the past few weeks we have learned that a Nigerian born “Doctor” working for a locum agency killed a patient by incorrect prescription: and another foreigner almost killed a little girl by faulty diagnosis and again wrong prescription. These are “Skills” Britain can easily do without, thank you.

Then we turned to the next can of worms: crime and criminality.
As expected, the three bumbling protagonists issued forth with empty political rhetoric and the next series of hollow soundbites.

Don’t know about you, but I’m tired to the point of vomiting by this useless tactic: since Willie Whitelaw became Thatcher’s first Home Secretary in 1979 and echoed the useless phrase “Short sharp shock” to Blair’s equally facile “Tough on crime! Tough on the cause of crime!”

Brown, naturally, was going to put 3,000 more police on the streets: Cameron was going to bang up more: Cleggie, as might be expected, since after, he represents the tree huggers, bunny cuddlers and general apologists for all social psychopathic scum, was going to give ‘em a hug and make them face their victims and apologise.

Yadder, yadder, yadder.

It’s very simple guys! I’ll explain it to you.

Discipline starts in the home: and next in schools: the types of social misfits currently plaguing British society have been created by left wing nonsense and political correctness. Teachers, generally tend to be lefties: and years back, ran away from their continuing responsibilities in demanding the ability to exercise significant and tenable sanctions over kids.

They all wanted more coppers on the streets: yeah; that’ll solve the problem.

Not.

Because simply, even when and where police detain miscreants, the courts deal so leniently with them, the kids sneer in utter and understandable contempt. Magistrates (JPs) are there now mainly, as an exercise in ego.

If not, then why, years back didn’t they all resign as their role was made pointless and they lost the battle?

Time after time, young thugs are “punished” by community service orders and the rest: and fines. Then they don ‘t pay the fines and are fined again: and again: and again: mainly, since they cannot pay them ‘cos they are unemployed dossers, living and sponging off the state: and your and my taxes.

And the fines are mainly written off: so what really is the point?

Brown had the unmitigated gall to finally state “Violent crime is falling!”

Really? Could have fooled me.

Last weekend in London five young men were killed: an innocent young woman was shot in the neck by a kid on a push bike, as she waited for a burger. A gang in South London, desperate for notoriety, calling themselves the Black Mafia, (Now, there’s a wee clue in the gang’s name………..), burst into a house, smashing down the front door and gatecrashed an 18th birthday party: and cut the throat of a young man as they fled.

London’s Metropolitan police authority established Operation Trident: to counter Black on Black crime. So, clearly it aint starlings running around London tooled up with shooters turning the suburbs into an urban equivalent of the OK Corral then.

Society is totally out of control: kids learn quickly how far they can push the envelope on bad behaviour: be it at school, on estates, on the streets wherever.

Urgently needed is not more empty words and pointless promises: it’s an acceptance by Government that instead of using the kid glove approach everyone in our society has to learn they must abide by certain core rules and social disciplines: and if they fail, then authority is going to fall on them like a ton of bricks!

And all politicians since Thatcher have done is adopt the new Wave Political expedient “Solution”: problem? Then we’ll pass a new law.

Why bother? Why not firstly, invoke and apply existing laws?

Example: binge drinking and subsequent anti-social behaviour in city centres wastes hundreds of millions every year in policing costs, emergency services and the rest.

Well, it’s been a public order offence to be drunk in a public place since time immemorial: it has also been a criminal offence for licensed premises (Pubs, hotels clubs bars etc) to sell alcohol to a person who is clearly already drunk. And the licensee of those premises can and should lose their license.

Problem solved.

Call Me Dave wants to start a watered down form of idealised National Service: trouble is it would not be compulsory.

And simply, it has to be: those who don’t want to share in society’s benefits and rather wish to cause anxiety, stress and loss to others need to be deprived of their freedom: and compelled to work, hard, with no treats, no fags, no TV until and unless they have learned the error of their ways. Then they might respect the core institution of their host society.

Above all, however, they must be deprived of their freedom: and isolated away from honest law abiding society: until and unless they change.

Cameron also wants many more prisons: nice concept Dave. Where’s the money coming from? We’re broke!

The absorbing subject of MP’s expenses came next: Cleggie, naturally, tried to seize the moral high ground, stoutly maintaining no LibDem MP’s had erred.

The Telegraph must have had it wrong then!
MPs’ expenses: Andrew George claimed for £308,000 flat used by daughter as ‘bolt hole’

Andrew George, a Liberal Democrat MP, is facing questions about his parliamentary expenses claims for a £300,000 London flat used by his student daughter while several of his party colleagues are under similar scrutiny.

It went on:

* Sir Menzies Campbell, the former leader, hired an interior designer to refurbish his flat in central London, spending nearly £10,000 of taxpayers’ money on scatter cushions, a king-sized bed and a flat screen television.

* Chris Huhne, the party’s home affairs spokesman, claimed for a £119 trouser press that was delivered to his main home rather than his designated second address. He has agreed to pay back the money. He also claimed for fluffy dusters and the upkeep of his “pergola cross beam”.

* Lembit Opik, the high-profile housing spokesman, charged taxpayers for a £40 court summons he received for the non-payment of his council tax. He will refund it.

* Julia Goldsworthy, the Treasury spokesman, bought a leather rocking chair from Heal’s as she spent thousands of pounds just days before the deadline for using the second homes allowance.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/5315055/MPs-expenses-Liberal-Democrat-claims-for-308000-flat-used-by-daughter-as-bolt-hole.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/liberal-democrat-mps-expenses/

Thereafter as might be expected, both Call Me Dave and Brown prevaricated and huffed and hurumphed about how they were going to clamp down and how wrong it all was. No apologies: no excuses no sorries, naturally.

Brown, our current glorious leader then waxed lyrical about how he and his misbegotten bunch of slavering incompetents were going to reform politics: sweeping changes to British political constitution: with a referendum of the public before they went ahead: yeah, right: that the one on the European Constitution, AKA Lisbon Treaty?

The one we were promised which never happened?
They then moved to education: and waffled interminably.

No plans; no strategies: no raison d’etre: and no explanation of why, if Zanulab’s throwing bundles of cash at education has been so very successful for 13 years, then why is it so many school leavers are either unemployed, following full time “Education” studying pointless and worthless degress is such hugely critical academic disciplines as Tourism and Leisure, Media Studies and even, I kid you not, degrees in Surfing! Or simply, and more critically, unemployable.

“SURFING

Cornwall College and Plymouth University make use of their locations near the surfing Mecca of the English south-west to offer courses in the sport. “

Really, you couldn’t make it up! Unless you were Salvador Dali, the morning after a day spent drinking bottle after bottle of Absinthe.

No mention, of course, of the fundamental lack of discipline which now infests a majority of schools: no mention, naturally, of how and why excess immigration in major city centres has destroyed education, as teachers cannot teach as such, when faced by kids who present with fifteen different languages!
It is therefore no wonder so many children when facing secondary school, are unfit, educationally, to face and handle the more demanding curriculum: mainly, since it does help to be able to read, write and count, first!

Finally the major topic of the economy and the budget deficit came up: it had to sooner or later.

And this was the very best illustration of why none of these clowns is fit to manage the dire economic and fiscal problems Britain now faces.

Brown and Cameron spent most of the time trying to score party political points over the National Insurance hike proposed and defended by Brown and criticised by Cameron. The amount of £ 6billion was batted backwards and forwards, repeatedly.

Let’s put this firmly into context.
From figures published February 18th 2010, UK public sector net debt was £848.5 billion. (or 59.9% of National GDP) – Source: Office National Statistics.

Bad enough: however then The PSBR (Public Sector Borrowing Requirement) forecast for 2009/10 is for net borrowing of £178 billion or 12.6% of GDP.

The present forecast Budget Deficit is in excess of £200 billion: or some 18% of GDP!

Yet Brown and Cameron talk as nothing much is wrong: except, of course, government is spending far too much money it doesn’t actually have!

Yet amongst these realities, Call Me Dave and Brown argued over a measly unimportant £6 billion.
Now, according to Brown’s statement, he seems to believe “The economy is the government!”

What?

When I studied economics, I learned that industry, commerce and people actually doing things and making money was the economy: and the greedy government hived off some of this profit and people’s earnings to pay the cost of essential services.

Not anymore it seems: nice Mr Brown will provide us all with well paid jobs, working for him! Which would be guaranteed to destroy the vestiges of the remaining economy faster than a speeding bullet!

The net result was simple: not one of these misfits had one single cohesive cogent policy for Britain’s economic future.
As the debate was winding down Afghanistan was touched on: once again, it was crystal clear there was no vision; no strategy and not one of them prepared to unequivocally state why British soldiers were fighting there anyway.
Brown, naturally took the opportunity to extol his virtues on supporting “Our brave men and women…”: neatly seeming to forget the dire mess the War Department is in and the vast sums they have been wasting through incompetence.

A question from the audience on care and health for older people, as the questioner was concerned about facing his own retirement, led Dave to state firmly how the Tories would ensure no one was compelled to sell their home to fund the costs of care home residence: Dave, of course, forgot to remember how it was Thatcher who forced local authorities to close and sell off their care homes and opened this up her favourite free market. Which allowed such unconscionable and venal rip off merchants like Duncan Ballatyne to build his fortune from care homes. What precisely an ice cream van salesman knows about geriatric health care could be written on the back of a postage stamp.
Thus we have in essence, Dave wanting to go back over old ground and put right past excesses and inequitable moves of the Tories: Brown wanting be allowed another shot at finishing ruing just about everything: and Cleggie wanting everyone to love him, so that he could hand over the keys of state of Britain to the faceless bureaucrats of Europe, allow continued uncontrolled immigration and set increasing numbers of violent prisoners free.

Clearly, not one of them or their parties has a remote clue.

We must all proselytise as many voters as possible before the election, if we really want to save what is left of Britain and turn it back to what it on ce was: and so very proud to be.

We’ve granted, by voting, stewardship and custodianship of this once precious and matchless land to professional politicians for many years: and in thanks, they have enriched themselves and destroyed the proud heritage which once was England; they are to a man and woman traitors to the cause and should be made to suffer righteous penalty.

Worth reminding ourselves, perhaps of the Bard’s words:

This royal throne of kings, this sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
This fortress built by Nature for herself
Against infection and the hand of war,
This happy breed of men, this little world,
This precious stone set in the silver sea,
Which serves it in the office of a wall
Or as a moat defensive to a house,
Against the envy of less happier lands,–
This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England.

Charles Hinchcliffe
April 2010

Share this post:

Hide Sites

As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share this post:

Hide Sites

If the clock could be turned back by 20 years, it would be possible to see how things were different.

Back then Margaret Thatcher was the Prime Minister, yuppies were busy enriching themselves, working class workers were bearing the brunt of the destruction of the manufacturing sector, Britain was not swept by political correct nonsense and even if mass immigration was starting to change a once ethnically homogeneous country, the worse was still to come.

After all at that time the attention was directed to Eastern Europe, where Poland for the first time elected a non-communist government and street demonstrations were putting pressure on the former communist regimes to change, thus starting a chain of events that would culminate a few months later in the fall of the Berlin wall and the end of the cold war.

At that time no one paid too much attention to Yugoslavia, apart from a few holiday-makers looking for a cheap resort.

No one would ever associate the Balkan country with troubles and there were no reasons to think otherwise. However if a week can be a long time in politics, a year can bring unexpected, radical changes.

Indeed in 1989 no one could believe that a year later Yugoslavia would start to break apart in a bloody civil war. Like a volcano that remains quiet for several decades and then suddenly explodes, ethnic tensions were building up for several years only to erupt in an orgy of violence that wouldn’t be out of place in a Quentin Tarantino movie.
The horror of that war was matched by the inability to understand why that war started in the first place.

The few who had inside knowledge of that country soon pointed out that the conflict was not a case of why but when. The truth was slowing start to emerge about a country that was divided along ethnic lines and the image of an harmonious multiethnic country was a big lie. This became evident during the Croatian Spring in 1970, when Croatian students protested against the central government because they felt exploited by the Serb.

Also violent demonstrations took place in Kosovo during the ’80 and it was an open secret that the communist party was divided on ethnic lines. Tito did his best to repress nationalism and prevent people from celebrating their own culture but clearly this didn’t cancel nationalist feelings as any person tends to stick to his/her ethnic group.

Sound familiar?

Yes, Britain is in a similar situation.

Of course no one believes that a civil war may happen here between native Britons and ethnic minorities. But also in 1989 no one could believe that an year later a violent civil war could break Yugoslavia apart.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share this post:

Hide Sites