We taxpayers resent a good part of our wage going to support the traitors in Westminster, but when the leaders of our Trade Unions behave in a manner that would shame even the pigging politicians, and what do union members say? They say keep taking our ‘subs’, we don’t mind supporting all sorts of Neo Marxist groups, we are more than happy that £16 a month goes to safeguarding the livelihood of hard done by Chairmen of the RMT, Unison, NUT, UNITE, FBU, PCSU and ASLEF to mention just a few. They are more than welcome to our hard earned cash after NI, and tax is stolen from us, and by the way please send some of it to Sub Saharan Africa and Nigeria, and don’t forget Somalia, Ethiopia, Kenya and any other God forsaken hell holes that think Communism is good for them.
As for the political contribution included in the ‘subs’, carry on giving to the various lefty organisations ie: UAF, HnH, Searchlight etc, all sponsored by the unions mentioned, and then whatever is left please feel free to use as you wish. It might be to ensure that the Chairmen of the above mentioned unions have a nice soft feather bed to sleep in when they go home to a lovely country mansion and chauffeur driven limo paid for by us of course (these are perks of the job by the way, it doesn’t come out of their pocket). Unlike the idiot members that have been hoodwinked into doleing out such largesse for 30 years.

Would you like a job that paid over £100,000 a year? Well that is just the sort of salary your union leaders are on, and that comes before the nice little ring fenced pension pot they get. SUCKERS….

The Taxpayers Alliance

Share

THE 1st Battalion The Royal Anglian Regiment, The Vikings, returned recently from another tour of Afghanistan. The Vikings lost five young men and many more were seriously injured. The BNP when in opposition in Barking and Dagenham campaigned for The Vikings, the local county regiment, to be allowed to march through the borough. To his credit the Labour Leader Liam Smith helped this happen. On Tuesday June 15 The Vikings will march with drums beating, bands playing, colours flying and bayonets fixed, through Barking. The march will take place from 12.30-1.30pm and the route will be through Wakering Road, Station Parade, East Street, Clockhouse Avenue, Town Hall Square, and Axe Street car park.

Now you would think this would be a chance for all residents including those recently arrived Labour Voters to show their appreciation for the selfless acts of our brave boys. Unfortunately, the Muslim extremists living in our midst and cultivating hate are going to use the event as a ‘show of force’. Islam Forum Europe, UAF, and the Muslim Council of Britain are some of the groups helping organise a demo against the march. We here are not asking for a counter demo but if you see these anti British clowns on Tuesday let them know you are against their extremist and Anti British views. All true ‘Patriots’ attending should take as many flags as possible and be prepared for lots of shouting and cheering. Lets give our boys a supportive welcome home they remember.

Share

Nationalists have always known that the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) is used by the corrupt establishment running this country as the literate attack dog (as opposed to the claw hammer gang UAF) on anyone who dare oppose the destruction of this country by the self-loathing white liberals that have nothing but hatred for Britain and the British.

NUJ rules ensure that the British National Party get only negative coverage and if this is not enough, it encourages its members to print stories based on lies.

However some good news comes our way, Michelle Stanistreet, deputy general secretary of the NUJ the main speaker at the EXPOSE event in Sheffield, a city represented in the European Parliament by BNP candidate Andrew Brons, is getting worried.

“Journalism comes with a responsibility, she said. We have to face the reality of what happens when we don’t do our job properly. We are encouraging our members to scrutinise people from across the political parties. But at the minute the BNP just isn’t being scrutinised properly,” Stanistreet said.

“We need people to know the difference between what these people are saying on TV and what they actually stand for. This needs to be exposed through the media.”

The NUJ has previously spoken out against the BBC’s decision to put Nick Griffin on Question Time and has created a guide to journalists for reporting the BNP.

The panel, including the Sheffield Star’s Julia Armstrong, also criticised falling standards in reporting for allowing extreme policies to go unchallenged.

Armstrong, who has been targetted by the Redwatch site, said that cuts made by Johnston Press were leading directly to “churnalism”.

She said: “Because of the cuts made over the last two to three years it’s tough to do your job.”

Referring to the new Atex technology being introduced by the group, which is the subject of tomorrow’s strike action by Johnston Press journalists in Scarborough, she said: “Our new content management system is more ‘mismanagement’.

“The Johnston Press slogan is ‘life is local’, but it doesn’t believe that. Life isn’t local to them, it’s centralised.”

On the proposed relocation of sub-editors from Scarborough newspapers to Sheffield, she said: “It basically means job losses. People won’t make that journey. They will either take up reporting positions and take a cut in pay or take redundancy.”

Dr Rhetta Moran, secretary of Greater Manchester Unite Against Facism and a NUJ member also featured at the event, which was attended mostly by student journalists.

Moran was arrested at the English Defence League’s protest in Bolton on 20 March and the union is working with her to appeal against her arrest. She said: “The difference between the EDL and the BNP is becoming more fluid. The reality is that neither gets the scrutiny it should in the media. Above all we need to raise awareness of the need to vote.”

Of course we don’t need to explain that what they are doing is not scrutiny but Soviet-style censorship and abuse of freedom of speech.

We have no problem with criticism, but what MSM does is print stories based on lies and distort the news in order to con voters into not supporting us.

It’s illegal but they know BNP members cannot afford to challenge MSM in the court and the law against libel doesn’t cover political parties and this is not just undemocratic but fascist.

The only thing we can do is to expose their lies and convince our supporters to stop buying newspapers and apparently our plan is working.

The marxists in charge of the NUJ are the real enemy of democracy because they want to impose their ideas on people and bully anyone who dares disagree with them.

Unfortunately for Mrs Stanistreet things are going to get worse for MSM.

Thanks to the internet people have the opportunity to find alternative sources of information and therefore they don’t need to buy a newspaper or watch the TV to know what is going on.

People are not stupid, after all the massive smear campaign carried out last year during the European Election’ campaign didn’t prevent us getting 1 million votes and 2 elected MEPs.

Let’s hope more journalists lose their jobs they will pay the price for their arrogance.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

It is self-evident that given the methods used in repeated occasions, the criminal organization identified as UAF has as its only purpose to derail the democratic process in Britain. For the all talk about Trust, the so called mainstream political parties will only realize the error of their ways when the streets of Britain are covered in blood. Harrassment and intimidation will be followed by murder. Communism is the antithesis of Democracy.

It seems that many in the so called politically correct establishment have forgotten the former Iron Curtain and what happens in countries like North Korea where the so called Marxist doctrines have created oppressive regimes. Such doctrines ultimately lead to war between nations with people behaving like robots, totally brainwashed and dehumanized. It is absolutely astonishing to see political parties like the Conservative Party in Britain supporting a Marxist anti-semite organization.

Share

From time to time, there is an earthquake in British General Elections and one wonders if this is not exactly what is about to happen. We witnessed the demolition of the Labour vote in last year’s local elections, county elections and European elections with Labour not winning a single seat and managing to get only about 2 million votes while the BNP received the support of a million voters.

But we also need to say that while the Conservatives should have increased their presence in terms of actual votes, they failed to capitalize on Labour’s misfortunes. Then, we look at a single seat in Scotland, in Glasgow Northeast. Of more than 60,000 people registered to vote, about 40,000 did not bother to vote and this is also a factor we have to contend with.

What will happen on May 6th, 2010? Should we believe the opinion polls when after all the polls depend on who organizes the said polls and the chosen sample of public opinion.

Having said that, one thing is certain. The Labour government that I believe is involved in money laundering for political purposes - this is my opinion and I assume individual total responsibility for what I say –  can hardly accuse others of being disunited and chaotic.

After it came to power, the Labour Party, as government, directed funding to ‘develop trade unions and educate future trade union activists and leaders’. Now, funnily enough, the monies given to trade unions ‘for educational purposes’ end up in the coffers of the Labour Party as ‘trade union donations to the Labour Party’. You can reach your own conclussions. I have to say that I have already made up my mind about what is really going on.

Now, let’s look a bit further. UNITE (one of its chief leaders is married to Harriet Harman – Labour’s Deputy Prime Minister) supports the UAF (that we know as United Against Freedom). Harriet Harman is directly involved and in actual fact she appointed Trevor Phillips as head of the so called Equalities Commission and Harriet Harman had an active role in appointing Gerry Gable (former Editor of Searchlight and Communist Party Member) as main director of the Labour Party electoral campaign in East London. 

Everything fits nicely and when you see UNITE using flags with the Soviet hammer and sickle and UAF members wearing balaclavas and attacking members and supporters of other political parties, you are suddenly brought back to the realities created by the Labour Party. So fear and repression financed with public money are very much Labour’s tactics.

The Golden Days of the Trade Union movement are very much over in the private sector where they only represent about 15% of all employees but, miraculously, when you look at the public sector, the level of membership rises to 57%. Why? Because the size of the State under a Labour government is very much linked to the need to employ its political associates. 

Having said that, like any old gambler will tell you, in a casino, chances are chances and, despite its criminal methods, Labour could very well lose the General Election.

Share

All we nationalists know that  Trinity Mirror group works in goose step with antifascist groups such as UAF to stop the British National Party; and its national and local papers are mouthpieces of the Labour party.

So it is surprises me that both the Daily Mirror and the Fulham and Hammersmith Chronicle are running a campaign against council papers, mostly published by Labour run’ councils (although Hammersmith & Fulham is run by a Conservative one).

The reason being that these council run papers are hitting the Trinity Mirror group in its wallet, and if this trend does not change then many of its local rags will be declared bankrupt.

We present the article in full as it shows the of the Labour party in Barking & Dagenham.

“They’ve been around so long, we take them for granted.

Perhaps it’s only on holiday or stumbling into a newsagent’s far from home you’ll suddenly notice the local paper on the bottom shelf.

It may have a lurid headline or a quaint old-world design. But either way it’s a reminder that wherever you are there is a rich community life.

It records battles over a new housing estate, results of last week’s dog show or the perennial struggles of another non-league team.

And there is only one place where such events are chronicled – by a local title that in many cases is over a hundred years old.

Berrow’s Worcester Journal traces its history back to 1690 and local newspapers in Leeds, Belfast, Aberdeen and Hampshire all date back to the eighteenth century.

The local press, in short, has been with us far longer than our national papers – but its survival has never been under more threat.

From Liverpool to Farnham, local newspapers hit by the recession are fighting off a challenge from Google.

And at the same time many titles, incredibly, are under siege by a massive expansion in State publishing. At first it sounds innocent enough. Council after council puts out its own periodical, all paid for with ratepayers’ money and pushed without permission through the door.

Some are occasional brochures but 150 across the land take advertising.

In some cases, such as East End Life in the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, the council paper is a weekly with professional journalists and its own advert reps, competing with the local press for news and classifieds.

Independently owned commercial titles are battling for survival against a well-funded onslaught.

Last year councils spent £257 million “communicating” with voters.

What’s wrong with council owned newspapers – “mini-Pravdas” as the critics call them? Simple. The fundamental task of any newspaper from the Daily Mirror to the smallest parish freesheet is to hold people in power to account while providing a bit of entertainment along the way.

If the people in power own the newspaper, well, you can’t expect proper criticism or investigation of their activities.

The result is endless banal “good news” about children’s playgrounds when there is a drug problem in the next street. Or nauseating pictures of ugly, pointing councillors while the council paper studiously fails to mention any time one of those elected representative gets into trouble.

When I last looked, Britain was a democracy; countries and politicians that directly control their media are usually amongst the most unsavoury regimes in the world, from China to Zimbabwe. And before any Murdoch or anybody else brings up the BBC, our national broadcaster is different.

We pay for it directly through the licence fee and its constitution and funding are kept separate from meddling ministers who, however hard they try, are only allowed to set the fee about once every seven years.

A council-owned newspaper is quite different. In Barking and Dagenham, the Labour-controlled council, which should be trying to deal with the scourge of the BNP, has to cut £30million in services over the next three years to balance its books.

But while school budgets, pothole repairs and care for the elderly will have to be reduced, the council is spending about £500,000 a year on a fortnightly newspaper, The News, which is handed out to 70,000 homes. …Because the council, like any public body, doesn’t have to worry about where the money is coming from. It can spend what it likes – leaving independent newspapers in crisis.

Meanwhile, the Barking & Dagenham Post, which has been around over 80 years, is struggling. It needs readers to pay for its journalists – the paper costs 55p and employs four journalists and an editor, selling about 11,000 copies a week.

Sales are down since the council launched its title and, to add insult to injury, Barking and Dagenham council decided to withdraw all its public notices from the title.

That took away another £100,000 from its revenue, cash that could be used for a couple more reporters.

In that kind of battle, the result is the worst of all possible worlds.

One the one hand, there will be an impoverished, commercially funded local paper that will gradually test the patience of its dwindling band of readers because its budgets are being relentlessly cut.

On the other, people in Barking will be left a happy-clappy propaganda rag serving the Labour council (“Work underway on new council homes” is the page three story in the latest issue of The News).

Its existence even gives locals another reason to vote for the racists because they believe their grievances are being ignored.

And the battle of Barking is being played out up and down the land.

Sadly, this is an issue on which Labour has failed to act. A half-hearted inquiry by the Audit Commission concluded the money being spent by on mini-Pravdas was “not unreasonable”.

It said that only a “few” council publications, like The News in Barking, came out so often as to be competition for scarce local car, job and property adverts.

Such laziness, though, obscures the reality. In many cases it is local MPs (of all political stripes) who encourage the development of council papers so they too can get a better press.

It is that sort of thinking that is unacceptable.

It is our raucous, noisy democracy that makes Britain great – a country in which it falls to venerable local newspapers to tell people how their money will be spent.

We need them to be vibrant and economically healthy, and if that means local council propaganda has to back off so be it.

There are far more deserving ways to spend council taxpayers’ money whether on teaching for kids schools or helping pensioners get around.”

Whereas nationalists may agree with some of the arguments made in the above article, the fact is that local papers are paying the price for their own arrogance and contempt for their readers.

Take for example Tower Hamlets.

The local paper, the East London Advertiser (ELA), faces unfair competition from the council run East End Life but, in spite of that, it managed to increase its circulation slightly.

The reason is that the ELA put the local politician in the spotlight and readers can see the difference between the two papers.

Of course the ELA is anti-BNP but it was one of the few newspapers that, when the BNP membership list was leaked a few years ago, didn’t write anything about members on the list living in Tower Hamlets.

Sadly the same cannot be said for the Barking & Dagenham Post that is much more biased.

Can anyone name a single local paper that offers fair coverage to the BNP or take a critical position about immigration?

We know the answer and this is why the claim that local papers play a vital role in the democratic process is rubbish.

If this was the case we wouldn’t see smear stories based on lies to stop a legitimate political party printed, even though the publishers are well aware they are breaching the law, and we wouldn’t get their political propaganda rammed down our throats in the vain hope that  we will accept diversity and multiculturalism.

Council papers should be scrapped but they are not responsible for the decline in circulation of local papers.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Share

As the date for local elections gets closer, and as night follows day, the inevitable happens. The treacherous liberal elite ruling this country increase their efforts to stop the British National Party by all legal, and illegal means, so we can expect more dirty tricks, more lies in the “dead tree press” and more appeals from community leaders for “Social Cohesion” to stop the “fascist” threat.

I have to admit, I was a little worried when I read in The Guardian that Searchlight is organizing a massive campaign to prevent the BNP gaining control of Barking & Dagenham.

But my worries were assuaged when I read that in Bolton 55+ UAF activists were arrested for causing trouble and assaulting police officers, this incident will remind people once again that the real fascist thugs are UAF (and by association all the signatories to it’s founding principles).

Assistant Chief Constable Garry Shewan, from Greater Manchester Police (GMP), accused UAF supporters of deliberately inciting violence and attacking officers who were trying to keep the two sides apart.

“We have seen groups of people, predominantly associated with UAF, engaging in violent confrontation,” he said. “It is clear to me that a large number have attended with the sole intention of committing disorder and their actions have been wholly unacceptable. They acted with, at times, extreme violence and their actions led to injuries to police officers, protesters and members of the public. ( I will not despoil this article with the name of the leading 20 watt light bulb arrested)

“The police are not and should not be the target of such violence and anger, and this protest and the actions of some of the protesters is roundly condemned by GMP and by Bolton Council.”

We Nationalists have known for many tears that the main purpose of the UAF is to use violence against anyone they think is a fascist, but never before has a senior Police officer made a similar statement.

This is an enormous boost for the BNP because voters had the opportunity to see who the violent thugs were, and Gerry Gable, Nick Lowles and their supporters in the MSM, as well as the Church of England will have a difficult job convincing voters that the British National Party is a threat to democracy.

They call us fascist, but who makes the headlines for violent behaviour and denial of the right to present a case for change?

Which organisation threatens to use violence to stop any event in which BNP members are invited, and which organisation always tries to disrupt BNP meetings?

You get my drift?.

I defy anyone to show even one incident in which a BNP member (apart from a few lonely and damaged individuals, and  while on the subject there a damn sight more of them present in UAF than ever were in the BNP) was arrested for assaulting Police officers or innocent bystanders, and as far as I can remember we have never used violence or anti-democratic means to prevent anti-fascists (“The new fascists will be the anti-fascists”: Churchill) meeting or to cancel events to which anti-fascists (nazis) had been invited to speak.

UAF are a blessing for us because their penchant for violence, and brain dead thuggery is the best way to counter anti-BNP smears, what happened in Bolton will surely help us in the following weeks, those images of UAF’ thugs clashing with the Police will not soon be forgotten.

Voters are not that stupid, and when they read or hear negative stories about the BNP they will think! Hmmmm I wonder why the MSM and the musical chair party hate the BNP so much?

I would be interested to know what Darren Rodwell’ thoughts are about the events in Bolton, given that he clearly supports UAF and political violence.

Let’s hope the UAF will carries on with their thuggish tactics, because their behaviour is the best recruiting sergeant for the BNP we could possibly have.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

Once again the BBC has proven what we already thought: anybody who is against the views of Marxist UAF is automatically classified as a Nazi by the BBC. Following the criteria of the BBC, even Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel, would be classified as Nazi by the BBC. 

I was member of staff of the British Broadcasting Corporation. I presented, produced and broadcast programmes for the BBC and I can say without any reservation that journalism standards have fallen into the gutter. The organization has become fraudulent, politically biased, corrupt and incompetent.

Share

More than a thousand Marxist paramilitary gangsters created chaos in Bolton today and fifty-five of them were arrested after they went on the rampage attacking passers by with the support of the Labour government that finances the thugs. When a certain Labour MP talks about violence, he should be reminded of the fact that his own government is financing and instigating violent acts perpetrated by people who up to now have harrassed and beaten and could end up killing and creating rivers of blood.

Well, nothing surprises me. After all, a Communist convicted thief is now in charge of Labour’s electoral campaign in East London. The funny thing is that the said convicted thief tried to distance himself from the UAF when he discovered that UAF is anti-semite and supports Islamic extremists.

Share

Image via Wikipedia

Durham Students Union has today voted to disaffiliate itself with the National Union of Students following the latter’s heavy handed and threatening tactics prior to a debate which was due to take place at the university in February. Andrew Brons MEP and Cllr Chris Beverley were both due to attend the debate on behalf of the BNP.

The event was eventually cancelled after threatening letters from the NUS were sent to student leaders at the university leaving them in no doubt that should they continue uphold democracy and freedom of speech, they would face protests by various groups including Unite Against Fascism (sic) and implied there would be violence against students.

“Should you fail to listen to our advice [to cancel the event] you will have a colossal demonstration on your hands. The National Union of Students, Unite Against Fascism, and other anti-fascist organisations are already mobilising nationally and organising coach loads of students to demonstrate at your university on Friday evening. This will no doubt bring with it a lot of negative media attention and if any students are hurt in and around this event responsibility will lie with you.

We would appreciate it if you could outline how you will now proceed with this issue and ensure that those students who are under threat from the BNP’s racist and homophobic principles will be protected.

We await your prompt response.

Regards,

Bellavia Ribeiro-Addy

NUS Black Students’ Officer

NUS Anti-Racism, Anti-Fascism Convenor

Daf Adley

NUS LGBT Officer

NUS Anti-Racism, Anti-Fascism Committee”

Anyone who has followed the activities of  the violent outfit, supported by David Cameron and others opposed to democracy, knows that to stand up for freedom means you have a real chance of becoming a victim of the UAF’s hammer wielding thugs and that you will not be protected by the police.

We should congratulate the students of Durham for taking this principled stand against the fascist bullies of the NUS and UAF. They may not support us but that fact that they are taking a stand against those who would deny both them and us our freedom is worthy of our support.

Now let’s see if they grow enough of a backbone to invite us to further debates and actually go ahead with them.

Share

Gwent BNP. One of our brothers in Wales, has brought this piece of trash journalism in the Western Mail to my notice.

COUNSEL GENERAL John Griffiths has urged all parties in Wales to refuse to take part in election hustings at which BNP representatives will be on the platform…..

Since when has a leading member of a political party had the right to take unto himself authority to dictate who should be seen and heard in the hustings process?

The Tories and LibDems have no problem with us, they would love to prove us “thugs and fascists”, (fat chance of that) but the PlaidCurry lot know that if they entered into debate with the BNP, Plaid lies thievery and traitorous behaviour would be exposed, as would that of New Labour.

Tory Assembly leader Nick Bourne said: “We think their agenda is vicious and needs to be exposed. It isn’t what people in Britain have stood for – I’m absolutely clear on that. “I think they are nasty, vicious thugs.”

I would like to ask Mr Bourne for evidence of our ” vicious thuggish” behaviour, because we have plenty of evidence about the use of the David Cameron supported Antifash UAF, and also allow us to debate with him about his allegation of “fascism”.

“I think it’s all very worrying, especially perhaps when we live in an age which is anti-politics and the mainstream parties are viewed with considerable suspicion because of issues like MPs’ expenses and sleaze and so on.” And his point being?

Everyone knows that 90+% of all politicians in the musical chair party are out for what they can get, or spreading their disgusting agenda of marxism, rascism, and fascism, anti democrats everyone of them.

Mr Griffiths said there were ways to attack the BNP other than taking part in the same hustings.

Possibly sub contracting with Cameron to hire out the UAF?

As spokesman said: “If the BNP is invited to an event, the Welsh Liberal Democrats should be there to take them on. The BNP has no interest in the important matters that people really care about – jobs, the NHS, good quality schools and reducing the tax burden for hard-working people.

I suggest the poor unread useful idiot of a spokesman visit our main site, reads our manifesto, and then judge us on that. We have policies on all those subjects, and more. It is a pity that the voters are such scaredy cats, just reading our manifesto will not give them heartburn or cause cancer.

Share

A few days ago it was reported on the main BNP website, that residents in Salford had contacted representatives from our party when it emerged that a local facility was being used as a polling station for the Iraqi general elections.

Local residents feared that violence might spill onto Salford’ streets, Salford City Council had suppressed any information about this event.

Nationalists will be interested to hear that not only was a similar election held in Brent, but also that Police arrested 16 people.

According to the Paddington & Westminster Times two people were arrested and charged for assaults on officers, another six were arrested and three of them charged with violent disorder, and eight others arrested for breach of the peace.

The arrests were made over the three days which this election took place, from Friday, March 5 to Sunday, March 7 at the Advait Centre, Forty Lane, Wembley.

About 12,000 Iraqis went to vote and 200 Police officers were deployed to keep the peace. (Were the Met under budget for ‘overtime’ in this period, and had to spend it or lose it?)

Nice to see that the Metropolitan Police can spare 200 officers for an election that has nothing to do with Britain, and whose voters are not supposed to be here in the first place at a time when violent attacks are taking place all around London and people are scared to travel on the bus or the tube.

Now we know the reason we don’t see more officers on the street, too busy at crowd control.

Would Police deploy the same amount of officers to prevent UAF thugs creating trouble?

We know the answer and we don’t need to comment any further on that.

Also we would like to know why those Iraqis didn’t go to cast their ballots in the Iraqi embassy or consulate here in London or why they couldn’t get a postal ballot, just as Italians, French or other foreigners do.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

A few days ago we reported that local politicians were concerned at the rise of the BNP in Hemel Hempstead.

A by-election is to be held in Adeyfield on the 11th of March, the Hemel Gazette reports that (“useful fools”) UAF activists will to be supported by Liberal Democrat MP Richard Grayson, and he will  encourage people to vote against the “far right”  BNP.

Mr Grayson said: “I was pleased to support Unite Against Fascism’s work in Hemel.

“Members of my family were very active in the campaign against fascism in the 1930s.

“I see the campaign against the BNP as being part of that long campaign to defeat racism in this country, and fascism more widely, and I am proud to take part.”

But the BNP claims that one in three households it has visited in Adeyfield has expressed support for the controversial party.

BNP candidate Janet Price said: “About one in three of the people we have visited have been ‘yes’.

“We’ve been getting a very good response from people as we go round.

“Nobody is rude. I’m quite surprised!”

She said they were using the Electoral roll and not going to homes where the names suggested people from an ethnic minority.

“We have a list of names. We won’t go there to aggravate them. It will only cause rows and we don’t want any upset,” she said.

Concerning the campaigners and the UAF she said: “That is their prerogative. We all have our views. It’s a free country.

“We should be able to have our views without causing any hassle.”

MP Mike Penning said: “The BNP desperately need publicity and I don’t want to give them any. I want them to wither on the vine.”

A Facebook group has been started against the BNP in Dacorum and another anti racist music concert is planned.

Mr Grayson may wish to explain why the Limp- Dhims need the help of  the fascist UAF to stop us.

If he is so sure we are the Devil incarnate, he should tell people about his party policies and why they should vote for the Limp-Dhims.

The fact he needs help from a third party indicates to me that he knows the locals don’t agree with him, or his Limp-Dhim policies.

It is well known that the Limp-Dhims want deeper integration by the EU, more immigration, higher taxes, and also want to reduce the age of consent for sexual intercourse, a way to legalise paedophilia by stealth.

How many prospective Limp-Dhim voters would agree with that?

Not many I suspect.

Luckily the UAF will be out causing trouble and the people will be shown who the real fascists are.

Winston Churchill said; “The next Fascists will be the Anti Fascists.”

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

As we slide into the General Election, the serial calumny artists are all setting out their stalls and beseeching us to beware of voting BNP: either because Nick Clegg, the wimpish limp-wristed apology for a politician tells us a vote for BNP is a vote of hate: or, in the case of the odious Zanulab charlatan Phil Woolas, who masquerades as what can risibly be called “Immigration Minister” informs us, BNP “Wants election violence!”.

Woolas stated that the Metropolitan Police and the hugely inefficient CPS were “Preparing for a surge in public order offences”: wouldn’t have anything to do with the unwashed spotty Rent-A-Crowd known as the UAF now would it, Phil?

He then went on to wax lyrical on precisely what Zanulab were doing about solving the problems of and caused by immigration: and stated that this would, after the economy, be the “Second most important issue between the main political parties”.

Forgive me if I yawn: Phil, you, you understand, aint top on my recruitment list for stable hands and horse minders!

This is the party it has to be remembered, which covertly instituted a hidden social engineering experiment by allowing huge unfettered immigration in order to break the political right for all time! As was revealed, last year, by one Mr Andrew Neather, one of the faceless civil service wonders involved in the plan’s architecture.

Trouble is, this “Plan” if it can be thus dignified – abortion is more apposite – has created massive socio-economic problems in its wake.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

This is the crowd that allowed London to be peopled by those of which over 30% were not actually born in Britain!

This is the party, which have enacted bill after bill to make sure we, the indigenous population are now legally, in far too many instances, second class citizens in the country of our birth and our parents and grandparent’s birth!

Woolas thereafter whittered on informing us all of the wonderful things Zanulab were going to do when elected to sort out the problem; yawn again, forgive me. The problems, of course, in the main caused by Woolas and his idiot chums since some fools elected them to power back in 1997!

Since when, it must be remembered, they have driven the nation into effective bankruptcy, handed out to tend of billions with no conditions to the very same bankers which caused the core problems in the first place and now saddled each and every one of us, man, woman and child, with debts so large, most people cannot even place the decimal point in the right place!

They have destroyed British nationality, run roughshod over each and every ancient institution and heritage, tried to ban us from freedom of speech, yet now dare to suggest we hand them once again the keys of state in order to perpetrate yet more outrages on the modicum which remains!

Now, the eponymous Lord Protector of Do Gooding and Bleeding Heart conscience, the effete Nick Clegg, denies Britain is a “Broken Society”: well, Nick Clegg MP Come on Down! From your Ivory Tower!

“Hate,” says Clegg, “won’t build a single house: won’t create a single job for your children; won’t open a single A & E department: isn’t going to solve a single crime!”

He went on, “This is one of the most important things we have learned as one of the most successful anti-BNP parties. They are pedlars of hate and we have learned they are also utterly, utterly useless!”

Well, Nick, so who’s good then? Your party, the Lib-Dems? A ragtag group of  ideologues ranging from silly fusty women who knit their own macro-biological pasta to dreamy theoreticians such as Vince Cable?

Or Zanulab? Don’t me laugh please: I just ate a good lunch!

Or Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon Boys: who, let’s not forget were the party of Thatcher and Porky Lawson, who once again, boomed up the economy, short-term which led to the economic crash of 1989/90: and prior to this, did precisely the same in 1971-1972: except the architects of this fiasco were Heath and Barber.

And what is worse, sat on their fat behinds whilst the immigration problem gather momentum and created the very social destruction we suffer from today.

They Still Don’t Get It

As they all fight for votes it is easy and convenient to denigrate BNP and indeed, any other political party they fear will be inevitable gainers come June.

Selling the old concept of BNP comprising only Neanderthal knuckle-dragging tattooed skinheads, bereft of intellect and knowledge and intent only on perpetuating mayhem in the cause of who knows what, is a neat get out and escape from reality.

Helloooo! Woolas! Helloooo Clegg!

The actual reality is simple: the vast majority of voters are disconnected, disenfranchised and discarded as non-entities from, of and by the political system: we are only important in terms of taxes and paying for the damned charade!

Well, newsflash! We’ve had enough!

We have watched powerless as our proud heritage has been destroyed: our economic base dismembered; our laws, hardly won since 1066, cast aside by weasels such as Jack the Lad Straw, with nary a bleat from Tory and Lib-Dem benches.

No doubt many 18 and 20 year olds, whose education is a result of yet more of Zanulab’s 13 years of social engineering and an almost complete failure to properly equip youngsters for work (Knowing the difference between a Transsexual, a Transvestite and a Lesbian and what Divali is all about may well be fun, but isn’t much use when seeking gainful employ!), will escape from their celeb-infested miasma for long enough to cast their vote for all the wrong reasons come June and it is this which such as Woolas rely on. Who knows.

Increasing numbers of articulate, reasonably astute adult and mature voters will support BNP since no other party is obviously interested in breaking up the Status Quo: they simply wish to continue as before, arguing the while in the Commons, like badly behaved little boys in a primary school playground.

No one with much of an intellect believes BNP could or would win power: what we do believe is BNP will gain influence and thus compel change: and provide a wake-up call to the main political hegemony: and by so doing, will force accountability, consideration of the majority of electors and their views, wishes and desires and a complete halt to unfettered governments driving social change simply because they happen to think it’s a good idea!

What is rewarding, is to see just how often mainstream politicians are now making their incomprehensible anti-BNP statements: they are clearly on the run!

Charles Hinchcliffe

February 2010

Share

We must be doing something right!

When the flak increases you know the target is close… The flak is getting heavier.

A few days ago we reported that the NUJ had launched a new pressure group aimed at exposing the “racist” nature of the BNP.

This is an article written by James Macintyre in the New Statesman on the 24th of February.

Nationalists are advised to read it in full because there is something that needs to be exposed about this anti-democratic campaign:

“Last night, a lively rally took place at the ‘Amnesty International’ headquarters in east London to launch a new pressure group called Expose, aimed at sharpening media scrutiny of the British National Party.

The organisation, whose work-in-progress web site is here, and of which I am a founding member, owes its inception to the hard work of a number of NUJ representatives, especially David Crouch of the Financial Times. The idea of it emerged after the BNP gained two seats in the European elections last year, and after its leader’s subsequent appearance on BBC1′s Question Time.

I would urge anyone opposed to the BNP to sign up.

Speakers at last night’s rally included our very own senior editor, Mehdi Hasan; Sunny Hundal, the editor of Liberal Conspiracy; Peter Hain, who bravely criticised Question Time for airing Griffin; Michelle Stanistreet, the NUJ’s deputy general secretary; Pat Styles of Bectu, the media and entertainment union; and Weyman Bennett, the joint secretary of ‘Unite Against FascismFreedom’

Mehdi opened proceedings with a pessimistic take on the current situation, declaring that “we live in dark times” and dismissing the “piss-poor” journalism of the BBC’s coverage of the BNP in the past year. Mehdi’s main message was a powerful warning against the “normalisation” of the BNP.

Sunny sought to expose various “myths of the right”, including that a fall in immigration would result in a fall in racism, pointing out that racism was still a small but present element of British society before enhanced immigration.

Peter Hain, the veteran anti-racist campaigner, issued a characteristically strong rallying call against allowing the “unique” BNP an “uncontested platform”.

Michelle Stanistreet gave a fascinating insight into the mindset of the newspaper group for which she used to work, the Daily Express under Richard Desmond, which — she said openly — simply told “lies” and made up so-called “investigations” about immigration and asylum.

Pat Styles cut through the phony respectability and “modernisation” of the current BNP, pointing out that its members are a band of criminal “skin-head thugs”.

And Weyman Bennett made the thoughtful point that intellectual arguments against the Nazis — including by Albert Einstein — did not stop the slaughter of six million Jews.

The latter point was in response to one of the few dividing lines that emerged during the meeting: over whether or not the BNP should always be engaged with. Despite warnings of being seen as censors, the consensus appeared to be that freedom of speech was of course to be backed at all times, except when it involves the (illegal) incitement of racial and religious hatred of millions of people.”

‘Amnesty International’ (AI) is a charity, and its aim is to fight torture, and the abuse of human rights around the world.

In the past although, it has been accused of double standards, because it refused to publicise torture in certain countries.

Now there are some questions that need answering.

The British National Party, far from supporting political violence, is victim of violence from the UAF, and UAF violence towards members of the BNP is akin to a dictatorship. So why have AI chosen to take side with groups that see the use of violence as legitimate action?

And as a rider to this. Is it legal for a charity to be involved in political activities?

This is something that we want to know and we urge anyone who can help us with that to post suggestions on our comments’ section.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share

The self-appointed, pompous and sententious Mathew D’Ancona loves any excuse to stick his verbal knife in the BNP’s ribs and whitter on in vitriolic and baseless attack, endlessly, in hugely self-important style as if he and only he is suddenly the guardian of Britain’s Social Conscience.

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standard/article-23805912-beware-the-bnp-has-never-been-more-dangerous.do

This time around, his focus is the BNP’s fairly natural decision to admit non-Caucasian members: always remembering that this perhaps un-natural decision was forced by the threat of legal action from that bastion of Left Wing Ideology and wannabe creators of NuLab’s Pie-in-the-Sky Utopian egalitarian multicultural Shangri La, the Equality and Human Rights Commission: you know, that cumbersome monolith determined to destroy the remnants of what was a once proud and great nation.

D’Ancona meanders on, foaming at the mouth about BNP’s security apparat: and thereafter maintains the party has never lost in roots in knuckle dragging Neanderthals etc: well, Mathew, I don’t know if you have been out for a pint, lately, but since you proudly boast you reside in London’s East End, then you will probably have noticed that most pubs these days boast a couple of your specimen Neanderthals on the door: let’s face it, any publicised BNP private event becomes the instant target for a would-be invasion from those well behaved groups such as the UAF Rent-A-Mob!

Now such as the UAF were seen, for example, trying anything to storm the BBC hallowed portals when Nick Griffin appeared on question time: and this bag of scruffy, quasi-literate unshaven, body-pierced, heavily tattooed cagoule-wearing misfits are not actually the precise type one would want to take home to meet Mum for tea!

However, in the spavined and myopic gaze of the superior being, D’Ancona, no doubt their sartorial eccentricities and lack of ablutionary exercise can be ignored in the common cause of perpetuating the Ivory Tower miasmic fantasies of the Bleeding Heart Lefty Do-Gooders.

This constant denigration of BNP and its membership and repetition by the far left of the skinhead dramas of days of yore, flies in the face of example: France became so mired in party politics for the pure sake of politics and self-elevation by politicians, that in 2002, Jean Marie Le Pen chased Chirac into second place in the first round of the presidential election! Chirac polling 5.6 million and Le Pen, 4.8 votes.

Must we then conclude that France is a nation of knuckle-draggers?

Far from it; it is now a far more cultured and stable country than Britain!

In an earlier critique of Mr D’Ancona’s nonsensical rant, I suggested he wake up and smell the coffee: the core-reason so many seriously consider voting BNP is simply because they are wholly disenfranchised, ignored, disregarded and marginalized by a political system in meltdown: yet simultaneously, expected to shoulder the lion’s share of the taxation burden which enables it!

This ignorant scribe then goes on to one again recount the utter myths of the benefits of what he calls “Economic Migration”: and avers Britain is a sort of temporary refuge: a place where the vision and essential national structure never actually existed: and then whitters away, listing a string of immigrant groups who “made” Britain.

As one who can proudly trace his antecedents to Tudor England, I personally take grave exception to such calumny!

His ignorance of British social and ethnic history and the specific history of migration to these shores is absolutely astounding in its fallaciousness!

He reels off racial groups such as Jews, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, Normans and even Huguenots: however, as always with these attempted and facile attempts at justification he misses four critically important points. First most of this migration was archaic; second, the incomers brought economically important craft skills – the Huguenots, for example bringing essential abilities for the time, in gold and silver smithing, metal working, weaving and leather working; next, they all integrated, learned the local language and added to it.

Finally, there is the little matter of time scale.

The mass migration we have suffered since it’s beginning in the late 1960s, accelerated throughout the 1970s: and reached its unsustainable peak once NuLab came to power, from 1997 onwards: to the point where over 30% of people living in London were not born in Britain!

Passing through the Clapton-Beck concert, D’Ancona then illustrates his utter total slavering ignorance of the roots and genesis of modern popular music: desperately trying to award absolute accreditation to Black music and musicians!

Neatly bypassing Appalachian folk roots and how these owed their true origin to Irish and Scottish immigrants way back when.

More study necessary, D’Ancona! See me after class!

Finally he turns to his heroine: the oleaginous and obnoxious Margaret Hodge and his fear she will probably be unseated at the next general election in Barking.

We can only hope so!

What is apparent to me, is how many people from all social, income and political backgrounds are much tempted by the BNP as a cogent and logical optional choice for their vote: let’s face it, there is little, in truth to chose between Call Me Dave and his Bullingdon mate Twee Georgie Osbourne, the vacuous Nick Clegg and his coterie of Pinko Bleeding Hearts or what now passes as Labour. All of these professional politicians seek self-preference, power and a chance at the financial feeding trough of state.

For the voter and tax payer they have little if any respect: the only persons they do respect are those who throw large amounts of cash their way in return for influence and special interest legislation!

Those vacillating voters need urgently to emerge from the closet, stand up and be counted: if not, then this once proud nation, debt-ridden, collapsed infrastructure and socially, increasingly mired in effective anarchy and chaos, will simply descend finally into the morass of insignificance and become precisely what such as D’Ancona fear: a sort of Third World Fascist Banana Republic, where the rich become ever richer and remote; and the poor and previously middle-class, live cheek-by-jowl in a Devil take the Hindmost sewer.

Charles Hinchliffe

Share

What state is  Britain in today, when an MP having no regard for the rule of law, sees  a politician with an opposing view to his, threatened with violence?

This Anti Democrat blames the opposing politician for the consequences,  and says, he or his party should pay half the cost of the police operation instead of demanding that the facists (UAF) do, those same people whose very actions are un-democratic and more akin to the activities of Robert Mugabe’s henchmen in Zimbabwe.

Would Mr MacShane demand that the organisers of the Notting Hill carnival to pick up the policing tab of over £ 6 million, which the hard pressed London taxpayer has had picked from their pocket, as were the hundreds of thousands of pounds spent policing the Sri Lankan Tamil protests outside Parliament earlier this year. No he wouldn’t, on those costs MacShane is deafening in his silence about who should!

It is to be hoped that the sane people of Rotherham have the good sense to send this odious little man packing at the next General Election and put in his place a patriot who believes in Freedom, Democracy, Identity and the rule of Law.

Share

Members and supporters of the British National Party are encouraged to attend the next Mayor’s Question Time at the GLA on December 16th.

Richard Barnbrook will be following up on the response he received to a previous question about the violent disorder of the establishment’s pet thugs, the UAF, at BBC Television Centre prior to Nick Griffin’s appearance on question time.

Question by Richard Barnbrook

Will the Mayor condemn the disgraceful violence and disorder perpetrated by the Unite Against Fascism organisation outside the BBC’s Broadcasting House following Mr Nick Griffin’s lawful invitation onto that evening’s Question Time programme? This behaviour resulted in three police officers being injured. Many politicians and public figures are signatories to this UAF organisation. And will the Mayor ask the Commissioner of the MPS to ban such an assembly should the BBC invite Mr Griffin onto the show at some future date?

Answer by Boris Johnson

The disorder was actually outside Television Centre, not Broadcasting House. I believe that it was counter-productive in the fight against the offensive views of Nick Griffin and the BNP. It diverted the media’s interest away from scrutinising the unpleasantness of Mr. Griffin’s party and only succeeded in giving him even more publicity. I have no intention of banning legal protests against the BNP. I believe in the freedom of speech.

Apparently Mayor Boris supports freedom of speech, so long as it is leftist thugs exerting their freedom. Can you imagine Boris saying the same if and angry crowd of BNP supporters had stormed the BBC in protest against any of his establishment chums?

Come along and show Richard your support at the next Mayor’s Question. Please be at the GLA building (City Hall), adjacent to the south side of Tower Bridge by 9.30am. Mayoral questions start at 10am.

You can see a complete list of Assembly Member Barnbrook’s questions to the Mayor, with answers received, by clicking HERE.

Share

Gisela Stuart, the German-born Labour MP for Birmingham Edgbaston, expressed support in her website for a protest organized by West Midlands UAF against Adam Walker in Birmingham.

Mr Walker, a BNP member, was due to appear in front of the General Teaching Council the 22nd of September in a hearing aimed to decide if he should be struck off the register after he was alleged to have used a school computer to contribute racist and religiously intolerant views to online discussions during lessons.

In a statement Mrs Stuart said:

“There is a threat that the BNP will again demonstrate in the centre of Birmingham in support of a member who is appearing before the General Teaching Council. Birmingham is famous as a vibrant multicultural city composed of people from many parts of the world. The BNP wants an exclusively white Britain and is led by a person who has denied the Holocaust and who now blames Muslims for Britain’s problems.

“The citizens of Birmingham cannot feel safe whilst the heirs of Hitler are allowed to parade in Victoria Square and preach racial hatred. We call on the people of Birmingham to express peaceful opposition to the politics of racial and religious hatred and to make it clear there is no place in Birmingham for organisations which wish to expel religious and racial minorities.”

Such rants are common among our elected MPs and we don’t need to remind people how they use the UAF thugs to attack our activists and supporters.

Unfortunately what Mrs Stuart did is much more serious given that the hearing has been postponed because Police believe it will cause flare-ups in the community and surely her comments played a big part in that.

Superintendent Matt Ward of West Midlands Police wrote to the GTC expressing “concern about the potential public order consequences of the hearing being convened in Birmingham at this time,” the council said today.

Superintendent Ward requested that the hearing be postponed or relocated to prevent further outbreaks of violence.

The council and the parties involved have seven days to find an alternative date and venues to prevent further delays.

The Police’ decision is understandable, they don’t want a repeat of the clashes between the Muslims and the English Defence League (EDL) that took place in Birmingham a few weeks ago.

What is not clear is if Mrs Stuart was aware of the consequences of her declaration when she totally supported the demonstration organized by the UAF, an organization that has never held peaceful protests and it’s infamous for its penchant for violence.

It’s also to be noted how the EDL was expected to take part in this demonstration, even if they have nothing to do with the BNP.

What it’s clear is that someone is playing a dangerous game and clearly is deliberately inflaming racial tensions for some sinister reasons.

Whatever the truth is it may be worth to report Mrs Stuart to the Police because she clearly breached the Public Order Act of 1986 and the Crime and Disorder Act of 1998.

Had a BNP member made a similar statement you can be sure the Police would have already looked into this complaint.

GIUSEPPE DE SANTIS

Share